lorenzoscottb commited on
Commit
a1e2a46
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 047860c

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +26 -10
README.md CHANGED
@@ -35,7 +35,17 @@ More information needed
35
 
36
  ## Training procedure
37
 
38
- ### Training hyperparameters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
39
 
40
  The following hyperparameters were used during training:
41
  - learning_rate: 0.001
@@ -49,7 +59,7 @@ The following hyperparameters were used during training:
49
  - mixed_precision_training: Native AMP
50
  - label_smoothing_factor: 0.1
51
 
52
- ### Training results
53
 
54
  | Training Loss | Epoch | Step | Validation Loss | Rouge1 | Rouge2 | Rougel | Rougelsum |
55
  |:-------------:|:-----:|:----:|:---------------:|:------:|:------:|:------:|:---------:|
@@ -78,15 +88,21 @@ The following hyperparameters were used during training:
78
 
79
  We selected the best model via validation loss. The table below reposts overall and feature-specific scores.
80
 
81
- | Feature | Rouge1 | Rouge2 | RougeL | RougeLsum |
82
  |:-------------|---------:|---------:|---------:|------------:|
83
- | Activities | 72.0539 | 59.8038 | 66.3395 | 66.3178 |
84
- | Characters | 90.8584 | 86.1662 | 88.5297 | 88.4876 |
85
- | Emotion | 85.2599 | 77.1463 | 84.688 | 84.7124 |
86
- | Friendliness | 74.3159 | 60.518 | 70.3793 | 70.3525 |
87
- | Good Fortune | 79.1209 | 11.5385 | 78.5714 | 78.5714 |
88
- | Misfortune | 65.5146 | 48.8599 | 65.3226 | 65.1807 |
89
- | Overall | 83.053 | 72.5731 | 80.8008 | 80.8026 |
 
 
 
 
 
 
90
 
91
  ### Framework versions
92
 
 
35
 
36
  ## Training procedure
37
 
38
+ the overall idea of our approach is to disentangle each dream report from its annotation as a whole and to create an augmented set of (dream report; single
39
+ feature annotation). To make sure that, given the same report, the model would produce a specific HVDC feature, we simply append at
40
+ the beginning of each report a string of the form ``HVDC-Feature :'', in a manner that closely mimics T5 task-specific prefix fine-tuning.
41
+
42
+ After this procedure to the original dataset (\~1.8K) we obtain approximately 6.6K items. %For this work, we focused on six HVDC features, namely Characters, Activities, Emotion, Friendliness, Misfortune, and Good Fortune. We did so to exclude features that amounted to less than 10\% of the total instance. Indeed, this would have excluded \texttt{Good Fortune} (see Figure \ref{fig:train_set_prefix_dist}). We include either way the feature to control for memorisation and counterbalance the \texttt{Misfortune} feature.
43
+ In the present study, we focused on a subset of six HVDC features: Characters, Activities, Emotion, Friendliness, Misfortune, and Good Fortune. This selection was made to exclude features that represented less than 10\% of the total instances. Notably, \texttt{Good Fortune} would have been excluded under this criterion (refer to Figure \ref{fig:train_set_prefix_dist}), but we intentionally retained this feature to control against potential memorisation effects and to provide a counterbalance to the \texttt{Misfortune} feature. After filtering out instances whose annotation feature is not one of the six selected features, we are left with \~5.3K %5389
44
+ dream reports. We then generate a random split of 80\%-20\% for the training (i.e 4,311 reports) and testing (i.e. 1,078 reports) sets.
45
+
46
+ ### Training
47
+
48
+ #### Hyperparameters
49
 
50
  The following hyperparameters were used during training:
51
  - learning_rate: 0.001
 
59
  - mixed_precision_training: Native AMP
60
  - label_smoothing_factor: 0.1
61
 
62
+ #### Metrics
63
 
64
  | Training Loss | Epoch | Step | Validation Loss | Rouge1 | Rouge2 | Rougel | Rougelsum |
65
  |:-------------:|:-----:|:----:|:---------------:|:------:|:------:|:------:|:---------:|
 
88
 
89
  We selected the best model via validation loss. The table below reposts overall and feature-specific scores.
90
 
91
+ | Feature | rouge1 | rouge2 | rougeL | rougeLsum |
92
  |:-------------|---------:|---------:|---------:|------------:|
93
+ | Activities | 72.1 | 59.8 | 66.3 | 66.3 |
94
+ | Characters | 90.9 | 86.2 | 88.5 | 88.5 |
95
+ | Emotion | 85.3 | 77.1 | 84.7 | 84.7 |
96
+ | Friendliness | 74.3 | 60.5 | 70.4 | 70.4 |
97
+ | Good Fortune | 79.1 | 11.5 | 78.6 | 78.6 |
98
+ | Misfortune | 65.5 | 48.9 | 65.3 | 65.2 |
99
+ | Overall | 83.1 | 72.6 | 80.8 | 80.8 |
100
+
101
+ ### Disclaimer
102
+ Dream reports and their annotation have been used in clinical settings and applied for diagnostic purposes.
103
+ This does not apply in any way to our experimental results and output.
104
+ Our work aims to provide experimental evidence of the feasibility of using PLMs to support humans
105
+ in annotating dream reports for research purposes, as well as detailing their strengths and limitations when approaching such a task.
106
 
107
  ### Framework versions
108