GenAI-EdSent / README.md
Erfan-Nourbakhsh's picture
Update README.md
23cc45e verified
metadata
license: cc-by-4.0
task_categories:
  - text-classification
  - text-generation
language:
  - en
tags:
  - sentiment-analysis
  - education
  - generative-ai
  - app-reviews
dataset_info:
  features:
    - name: app_name
      dtype: string
    - name: source_file
      dtype: string
    - name: review_reviewId
      dtype: string
    - name: review_userName
      dtype: string
    - name: review_userImage
      dtype: string
    - name: review_content
      dtype: string
    - name: review_score
      dtype: int64
    - name: review_thumbsUpCount
      dtype: int64
    - name: review_reviewCreatedVersion
      dtype: string
    - name: review_at
      dtype: string
    - name: review_replyContent
      dtype: string
    - name: review_repliedAt
      dtype: string
    - name: review_appVersion
      dtype: string
    - name: app_info_json
      dtype: string
    - name: app_title
      dtype: string
    - name: app_summary
      dtype: string
    - name: app_description
      dtype: string
    - name: app_descriptionHTML
      dtype: string
    - name: app_genre
      dtype: string
    - name: app_genre_id
      dtype: string
    - name: app_developer
      dtype: string
    - name: app_developer_email
      dtype: string
    - name: app_installs
      dtype: string
    - name: app_minInstalls
      dtype: int64
    - name: app_realInstalls
      dtype: int64
    - name: app_score
      dtype: float64
    - name: app_ratings
      dtype: int64
    - name: app_reviews_count
      dtype: int64
    - name: app_price
      dtype: int64
    - name: app_free
      dtype: bool
    - name: app_offersIAP
      dtype: bool
    - name: app_inAppProductPrice
      dtype: string
    - name: app_appId
      dtype: string
    - name: app_url
      dtype: string
    - name: app_icon
      dtype: string
    - name: app_headerImage
      dtype: string
    - name: app_released
      dtype: string
    - name: app_lastUpdatedOn
      dtype: string
    - name: app_updated_ts
      dtype: int64
    - name: app_version
      dtype: string
  splits:
    - name: train
      num_bytes: 7755072015
      num_examples: 480831
    - name: app_AI_Quiz_Generator
      num_bytes: 1758004
      num_examples: 109
    - name: app_Edu_AI_AI_Homework_Helper
      num_bytes: 403211
      num_examples: 25
    - name: app_Help_AI_Your_Homework_With_AI
      num_bytes: 30127996
      num_examples: 1868
    - name: app_Answer_AI_Your_AI_tutor
      num_bytes: 263748994
      num_examples: 16353
    - name: app_Quiz_AI_AI_Homework_Helper
      num_bytes: 4306303
      num_examples: 267
    - name: app_Teacher_AI_Language_Practice
      num_bytes: 887066
      num_examples: 55
    - name: app_Studocu_AI_Homework_Helper
      num_bytes: 37611609
      num_examples: 2332
    - name: app_Kahoot_Play_Create_Quizzes
      num_bytes: 550739124
      num_examples: 34147
    - name: app_Quizard_AI_Homework_Helper
      num_bytes: 23289521
      num_examples: 1444
    - name: app_Homework_AI_Math_Essay_App
      num_bytes: 68594415
      num_examples: 4253
    - name: app_Course_Hero_AI_Homework_Help
      num_bytes: 68223460
      num_examples: 4230
    - name: app_Academi_AI_Study_Exam_Tutor
      num_bytes: 3935348
      num_examples: 244
    - name: app_Nerd_AI_Tutor_Math_Helper
      num_bytes: 237233777
      num_examples: 14709
    - name: app_Tutor_AI_Learning_Assistants
      num_bytes: 193541
      num_examples: 12
    - name: app_StudyX_AI_Homework_Helper
      num_bytes: 98738539
      num_examples: 6122
    - name: app_School_Hack
      num_bytes: 84755149
      num_examples: 5255
    - name: app_Gauth_AI_Study_Companion
      num_bytes: 1672716669
      num_examples: 103712
    - name: app_Question_AI_Chatbot_Math_AI
      num_bytes: 528610853
      num_examples: 32775
    - name: app_Brainly_AI_Homework_Helper
      num_bytes: 3767612368
      num_examples: 233600
    - name: app_AI_Questions_Generator
      num_bytes: 5548196
      num_examples: 344
    - name: app_Blackboard
      num_bytes: 301376732
      num_examples: 18686
    - name: app_Mathos_AI_Math_Helper_Tutor
      num_bytes: 4661130
      num_examples: 289
  download_size: 196210355
  dataset_size: 15510144020
configs:
  - config_name: default
    data_files:
      - split: train
        path: data/train-*
      - split: app_AI_Quiz_Generator
        path: data/app_AI_Quiz_Generator-*
      - split: app_Edu_AI_AI_Homework_Helper
        path: data/app_Edu_AI_AI_Homework_Helper-*
      - split: app_Help_AI_Your_Homework_With_AI
        path: data/app_Help_AI_Your_Homework_With_AI-*
      - split: app_Answer_AI_Your_AI_tutor
        path: data/app_Answer_AI_Your_AI_tutor-*
      - split: app_Quiz_AI_AI_Homework_Helper
        path: data/app_Quiz_AI_AI_Homework_Helper-*
      - split: app_Teacher_AI_Language_Practice
        path: data/app_Teacher_AI_Language_Practice-*
      - split: app_Studocu_AI_Homework_Helper
        path: data/app_Studocu_AI_Homework_Helper-*
      - split: app_Kahoot_Play_Create_Quizzes
        path: data/app_Kahoot_Play_Create_Quizzes-*
      - split: app_Quizard_AI_Homework_Helper
        path: data/app_Quizard_AI_Homework_Helper-*
      - split: app_Homework_AI_Math_Essay_App
        path: data/app_Homework_AI_Math_Essay_App-*
      - split: app_Course_Hero_AI_Homework_Help
        path: data/app_Course_Hero_AI_Homework_Help-*
      - split: app_Academi_AI_Study_Exam_Tutor
        path: data/app_Academi_AI_Study_Exam_Tutor-*
      - split: app_Nerd_AI_Tutor_Math_Helper
        path: data/app_Nerd_AI_Tutor_Math_Helper-*
      - split: app_Tutor_AI_Learning_Assistants
        path: data/app_Tutor_AI_Learning_Assistants-*
      - split: app_StudyX_AI_Homework_Helper
        path: data/app_StudyX_AI_Homework_Helper-*
      - split: app_School_Hack
        path: data/app_School_Hack-*
      - split: app_Gauth_AI_Study_Companion
        path: data/app_Gauth_AI_Study_Companion-*
      - split: app_Question_AI_Chatbot_Math_AI
        path: data/app_Question_AI_Chatbot_Math_AI-*
      - split: app_Brainly_AI_Homework_Helper
        path: data/app_Brainly_AI_Homework_Helper-*
      - split: app_AI_Questions_Generator
        path: data/app_AI_Questions_Generator-*
      - split: app_Blackboard
        path: data/app_Blackboard-*
      - split: app_Mathos_AI_Math_Helper_Tutor
        path: data/app_Mathos_AI_Math_Helper_Tutor-*

GenAI-EdSent Logo

๐ŸŽ“ GenAI-EdSent: Sentiment-Driven Evaluation of AI Educational Apps

Python License Paper HuggingFace Status

Unveiling User Perceptions in the Generative AI Era Through Large-Scale Sentiment Analysis


๐Ÿ“– Overview

The integration of Generative AI into education has sparked a digital transformation in e-teaching, yet user perceptions of AI educational apps remain critically underexplored. This research project bridges that gap through a comprehensive sentiment-driven evaluation of user reviews from top AI educational apps on the Google Play Store.

This dataset accompanies the paper Unveiling User Perceptions in the Generative AI Era: A Sentiment-Driven Evaluation of AI Educational Apps' Role in Digital Transformation of E-Teaching.

Code: https://github.com/erfan-nourbakhsh/GenAI-EdSent

๐ŸŽฏ Research Objectives

  1. Quantify sentiment distributions and distill key positive/negative themes across app categories
  2. Compare performance trends among different app types (homework helpers, math solvers, LMS, etc.)
  3. Propose future directions for AI educational ecosystems with hybrid AI-human models

๐Ÿ“„ Associated Paper

Title: Unveiling User Perceptions in the Generative AI Era: A Sentiment-Driven Evaluation of AI Educational Apps' Role in Digital Transformation of E-Teaching

Authors: Adeleh Mazaheriyan (Islamic Azad University) & Erfan Nourbakhsh (University of Isfahan)

Abstract: This study performs a sentiment-driven evaluation of user reviews from 22 top AI ed-apps on the Google Play Store to assess efficacy, challenges, and pedagogical implications. Our pipeline leverages RoBERTa for binary sentiment classification, GPT-4o for key point extraction, and GPT-5 for synthesizing top positive/negative themes. Results reveal predominantly positive sentiments, with homework apps leading (e.g., Edu AI: 95.9% positive) while specialized LMS/language apps lag due to stability issues.


๐Ÿ“Š Research at a Glance

๐Ÿ“ฑ Apps Analyzed ๐Ÿ’ฌ Reviews Processed ๐Ÿค– AI Models Used ๐Ÿ“š Categories
22 481,000+ 3 (RoBERTa, GPT-4o, GPT-5) 7

๐Ÿ”ฅ Quick Stats

๐ŸŽฏ 96.0% positive sentiment for top performer (Edu AI) โšก 481K training reviews โ€ข 481K validation samples ๐Ÿ“ˆ 4.43M total ratings across all apps ๐Ÿ† 85% average positive sentiment for homework helpers โš ๏ธ 21.8% positive sentiment for lowest performer (Teacher AI)


๐Ÿ” Key Findings

๐Ÿ“Š Sentiment Distribution Highlights

  • Homework Helpers dominate with ~85% positive sentiment

    • ๐Ÿฅ‡ Edu AI: 96.0% positive (accuracy, speed, personalization)
    • ๐Ÿฅˆ Answer.AI: 92.7% positive (24/7 tutoring, step-by-step explanations)
  • Math-Focused Solvers show strong performance (~80% positive)

    • Users praise problem-solving efficiency and photo recognition
  • Language/LMS Apps lag behind (20-40% positive)

    • โš ๏ธ Teacher AI: 21.8% positive (instability, limited features)
    • Issues: crashes, paywalls, feature gaps

๐ŸŒŸ Top Positive Themes

  1. โšก Efficiency & Speed - Quick solutions for homework and brainstorming
  2. ๐ŸŽฏ Personalized Learning - Step-by-step explanations tailored to student needs
  3. ๐ŸŽฎ Engagement - Gamification and community features boost motivation
  4. ๐ŸŒ Accessibility - Democratizing education for under-resourced areas
  5. ๐Ÿค Multi-Subject Support - Versatile tools across STEM and humanities

โš ๏ธ Top Negative Themes

  1. ๐Ÿ’ฐ Aggressive Monetization - Restrictive paywalls limiting free features
  2. โŒ Inaccuracies - Wrong answers eroding trust, especially in specialized domains
  3. ๐Ÿ“บ Excessive Ads - Disrupting learning flow
  4. ๐Ÿ› Technical Glitches - Crashes, slow loading, notation failures
  5. โš–๏ธ Equity Concerns - Digital divide and over-reliance risks

๐Ÿ› ๏ธ Methodology

Our systematic pipeline combines web scraping, transformer-based NLP, and large language models to analyze authentic user feedback at scale.

Methodological Approach Figure 1: Multi-stage workflow from data collection to theme synthesis

๐Ÿ”„ Pipeline Stages

1๏ธโƒฃ App Selection & Categorization

  • Selected 22 prominent AI education apps based on ratings, downloads, and GenAI integration
  • Categorized into 7 functional types with overlaps for multifunctional designs:
    • ๐Ÿ“ AI Quiz & Question Generators
    • ๐ŸŽ’ All-in-One Study Companions
    • โœ๏ธ Homework Helpers
    • ๐Ÿ”ข Math-Focused Solvers & Specialized Tools
    • ๐Ÿ“„ Document/Content Tools
    • ๐Ÿซ Learning Management Systems (LMS)
    • ๐ŸŒ Language Learning Apps

2๏ธโƒฃ Data Collection

  • Web scraping from Google Play Store using Python
  • Collected app metadata + verbatim user reviews (up to November 2025)
  • Dataset: Tens of thousands to millions of reviews per app

3๏ธโƒฃ Sentiment Analysis & Theme Extraction

Stage Model Purpose
Binary Classification RoBERTa Transformer-based sentiment labeling (positive/negative)
Key Point Extraction GPT-4o Distill recurring themes and pain points
Theme Synthesis GPT-5 Generate top 5 positive/negative summaries

4๏ธโƒฃ Aggregation & Trend Analysis

  • Computed sentiment percentages per app and category
  • Enabled cross-app performance comparisons

๐Ÿ“ˆ Results

Sentiment Analysis Results Figure 2: Positive vs. negative sentiment percentages across 22 AI educational apps

๐Ÿ† Top Performers

Rank App Category Positive %
1 Edu AI Homework Helper 96.0%
2 Answer.AI Multi-Tool 92.7%
3 Question.AI Chatbot/Math 87.9%
4 Homework AI Math/Essay 85.6%
5 Help AI Homework Helper 85.2%

โš ๏ธ Areas for Improvement

Rank App Category Positive % Key Issues
22 Teacher AI Language 21.8% Instability, limited features
21 Tutor AI Learning Assistant 41.7% Narrow functionality
20 Blackboard LMS 53.3% Technical glitches

๐Ÿ“Š Category-Level Insights

  • Homework Helpers: Average 85% positive โ†’ Strong personalization and speed
  • Math Solvers: Average 80% positive โ†’ Photo recognition praised, notation failures criticized
  • LMS/Language Apps: Average 35% positive โ†’ Urgent need for stability improvements

๐Ÿ’ก Future Directions

๐Ÿ”ฎ Proposed Innovations

  1. Hybrid AI-Human Models ๐Ÿค

    • Combine app strengths (real-time assistance) with teacher oversight
    • Mitigate risks like inaccuracies and over-dependency
  2. VR/AR Integration ๐Ÿฅฝ

    • Immersive learning experiences (virtual labs, interactive simulations)
    • Address gaps in engagement and multimodal inputs
  3. Ethical AI Roadmap โš–๏ธ

    • For Developers: Adaptive personalization, plagiarism detection, equitable monetization
    • For Policymakers: Mandated free tiers, accuracy standards, data privacy protections

๐Ÿ“Š Dataset

The full dataset containing 481,000+ app reviews from 22 AI educational apps is publicly available on Hugging Face:

๐Ÿ”— GenAI-EdSent Dataset on Hugging Face

The dataset includes:

  • App Information: Metadata for all 22 applications (ratings, descriptions, install counts)
  • User Reviews: Complete review texts with scores, timestamps, and sentiment labels
  • Sentiment Analysis Results: Binary classification outputs from RoBERTa
  • Extracted Insights: Key positive/negative themes per application

๐Ÿ“ Repository Data Files

This repository includes curated analysis outputs:

1. App_Ratings.json - Application Metadata

Contains Google Play Store ratings and summaries for all 22 apps:

๐Ÿ“‹ View Sample Data
{
  "name": "Edu AI - AI Homework Helper",
  "summary": "AI Homework Helper - Math, Physics, Chemical, etc.",
  "app_score": 4.55
},
{
  "name": "Answer.AI - Your AI tutor",
  "summary": "Scan and Get Instant Answers on Your Phone",
  "app_score": 4.73
}

Top Rated Apps:

  • ๐Ÿฅ‡ Studocu: 4.86/5 โญ
  • ๐Ÿฅˆ Gauth: 4.77/5 โญ
  • ๐Ÿฅ‰ Kahoot!: 4.74/5 โญ

Lowest Rated Apps:

  • โš ๏ธ Teacher AI: 2.29/5 โญ
  • โš ๏ธ Blackboard: 3.39/5 โญ
  • โš ๏ธ Tutor AI: 3.40/5 โญ

2. Top_5_Points.json - Sentiment Themes Per App

Contains the top 5 positive and negative points extracted for each application using GPT-4o and GPT-5:

๐Ÿ“‹ View Sample Analysis (Edu AI)

Positive Points:

  1. โœ… The app enables users to complete homework tasks effectively
  2. โœ… The app delivers perfect-quality assignment outputs that meet high standards

Negative Points:

  1. โŒ The app returns answers in Spanish instead of matching the user's preferred language
  2. โŒ Text is displayed in a font size that is too small to read comfortably
๐Ÿ“‹ View Sample Analysis (Answer.AI)

Positive Points:

  1. โœ… Reliably helps students complete homework across subjects and grade levels
  2. โœ… Consistently delivers accurate, correct answers
  3. โœ… Explains solutions step by step with reasoning
  4. โœ… Provides answers very quickly with fast response times
  5. โœ… Easy to use with intuitive interface and camera/scan input

Negative Points:

  1. โŒ Frequently provides incorrect or incomplete answers (especially math/graphs)
  2. โŒ Core features locked behind expensive paywall
  3. โŒ Restrictive energy/points system limits free usage
  4. โŒ App instability with crashes and broken features
  5. โŒ Unreliable camera/scan and image recognition

Key Insights from Theme Analysis:

  • Most Praised: Homework efficiency, step-by-step explanations, speed
  • Most Criticized: Paywalls, accuracy issues, technical instability
  • Category Trends: Homework helpers excel; LMS/language apps struggle

๐Ÿš€ Installation

Prerequisites

Python 3.8+
pip

Setup

# Clone the repository
git clone https://github.com/erfan-nourbakhsh/GenAI-EdSent.git
cd GenAI-EdSent

# Install dependencies
pip install -r requirements.txt

Required Libraries

  • transformers (RoBERTa model)
  • openai (GPT API access)
  • beautifulsoup4 / selenium (web scraping)
  • pandas, numpy (data processing)
  • matplotlib, seaborn (visualization)

๐Ÿ”ฌ Sample Usage

1. Sentiment Classification

# Run RoBERTa-based sentiment analysis
python Positive_Negative_Points_Classifier.py

2. Extract Key Points

# Use GPT-4o to extract themes from reviews
python Positive_Negative_Points_Generator.py

3. Generate Top Themes

# Synthesize top 5 positive/negative points with GPT-5
python Top_5_Points_Generator.py

๐Ÿ“š Citation

If you use this work in your research, please cite:

@article{mazaherian2025unveiling,
  title={Unveiling User Perceptions in the Generative AI Era: A Sentiment-Driven Evaluation of AI Educational Apps' Role in Digital Transformation of e-Teaching},
  author={Mazaherian, Adeleh and Nourbakhsh, Erfan},
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.11934},
  year={2025}
}

๐Ÿ‘ฅ Meet the Researchers

๐ŸŒŸ Behind the Research

A collaborative effort bridging educational theory and AI technology to understand how generative AI is reshaping learning experiences worldwide.

Education Expert

๐ŸŽ“ Adeleh Mazaheriyan

Education Researcher

Department of Education
Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

Specializes in pedagogical evaluation and digital transformation in e-teaching, bringing educational theory perspective to AI assessment.

๐Ÿ“ง [email protected]

AI Engineer

๐Ÿค– Erfan Nourbakhsh

AI Researcher & Developer

Artificial Intelligence Department
University of Isfahan, Iran

Expert in NLP, sentiment analysis, and LLM applications, developing the technical pipeline for large-scale review analysis.

๐Ÿ“ง [email protected]

๐Ÿค Interdisciplinary Collaboration

This research exemplifies the power of interdisciplinary collaboration, combining:

  • ๐Ÿ“š Educational Theory โ†’ Understanding pedagogical implications
  • ๐Ÿง  AI/ML Technology โ†’ Analyzing 960K+ reviews at scale
  • ๐Ÿ“Š Data Science โ†’ Extracting actionable insights for stakeholders

Together, we're working to ensure AI in education serves all learners equitably.


๐Ÿค Contributing

Contributions are welcome! Please feel free to submit a Pull Request. For major changes, please open an issue first to discuss proposed changes.


๐Ÿ“„ License

This dataset is licensed under the CC-BY-4.0 License. The code is licensed under the MIT License.


๐ŸŒŸ Acknowledgments

We extend our gratitude to:

  • Microsoft Education for the 2025 AI in Education Report
  • RAND Corporation for K-12 AI adoption insights and teacher engagement studies
  • OpenAI & Hugging Face for providing access to state-of-the-art language models (GPT-4o, GPT-5, RoBERTa)
  • Google Play Store developers and the educational AI community
  • Thousands of users whose reviews made this research possible

๐Ÿ“ž Contact & Collaboration

We welcome questions, feedback, and collaboration opportunities!

For Research Inquiries:

Interested in:

  • Collaborative research on AI in education?
  • Extending this analysis to other platforms (Apple App Store, web apps)?
  • Developing predictive models for app success?
  • Contributing to the codebase?

We'd love to hear from you! ๐Ÿ’ฌ


โญ If you find this research useful, please star the repository! โญ

GitHub stars

Advancing equitable, innovative e-teaching through user-driven AI insights


Made with โค๏ธ for the future of education