Split (1)

train · 5.08k rows

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.

thread_id stringlengths 37 43	source_file stringlengths 35 37	subject stringlengths 0 231 ⌀	messages stringlengths 88 34.9k	message_count int64 1 42
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028611.txt_23875	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028611.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "1/23/2019 2:42:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Have thought many, many things about you over the years,,,,,never thought you were my cheryl....."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 5:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "im not sheyl, frankly i havent been involved in this at all except for the ridiculousness . we will resolve it by end of month. ."}, {"sender": "J [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 5:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "i suggest we wait until face to face yes he fucked up. but ,,,"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 11:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: Re:", "body": "Ok....but give me an idea what follows the but....otherwise \| will imagine the worst...."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 11:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: Re:", "body": "So....remarkably...in the middle of dealing with thiss the Steptoe numbercrunchers advise me Jeffrey has paid about 450 and owes about 300 and seems disinclined to make Steptoe whole.....Ahhhhmmmm....first reaction is déja vu.... How the fuck are we back here after the unspeakably awful evan barr debacle.... More to the point just tell me where you are on this....did miller fuck up? Something else? As you know \| am the 800 pound gorilla here, Steptoe is not going to chase you down for the money but there are 500 lawyers here, processes, etc......"}, {"sender": "J [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 4:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "do you think he has the goods?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 9:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not my new guy...not repping him"}]	7
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031709.txt_23879	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031709.txt	Fwd: BBC News: A silver lining in #TrumpTapes story	[{"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "10/12/2016 7:53:37 AM", "subject": "Fwd: BBC News: A silver lining in #TrumpTapes story", "body": "I saw this on the BBC News App and thought you should see it:\n\nA silver lining in #TrumpTapes story\nWhile the video of Donald Trump denigrating women has horrified\n\nmany, the backlash has also showed how much has changed for\nwomen. Trumps PUSSY Gate"}]	1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032906.txt_23884	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032906.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["David Blaine"], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 1:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "dinner with woody sun?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 2:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "7?"}, {"sender": "David Blaine [qT]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Great"}, {"sender": "David Blaine [qT]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:07 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Perfect"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["David Blaine"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:08:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-\n\nDonald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}]	5
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033008.txt_23886	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033008.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 8:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Navigate wash views on intl law and sanctions"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 10:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Why does he need counsel?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jun 11, 2017, at 10:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I assume you do not want to represent. Hamad bin jassim? Qatar. Hired Ashcroft. ? Silly, Anyone you would like to suggest for him?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 10:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "We're you on tv today?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 7:53 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "On Jun 12, 2017, at 7:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Fun? When are you in New York this week"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 5:56 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "All week. How do you know if you have appendicitis?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jun 12, 2017, at 8:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "lower right side excrutiating"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 7:25 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Maybe Trump wants to get impeached. Going after Mueller is declaring holy war."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "6/13/2017 1:32:37 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "However not firing him might be suicide"}]	10
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020143.txt_23889	IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020143.txt	Fwd: Pro Rata: Wednesday, February 21	[{"sender": "Steven Sinofsky PO", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "2/21/2018 5:48:07 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Pro Rata: Wednesday, February 21", "body": "Excerpt from below...\n\nSame old story: Yesterday, I grabbed coffee with Day One Ventures\nfounder Masha Drokova, and heard a familiar—and still disappointing\n—story: While raising her fund, she was told by prospective investors\n\nthat she should get a male co-founder.\n\ne She initially considered the suggestion, she told me, before\n\nremembering it's rooted in sexism."}, {"sender": "Kia Kokalitcheva", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "February 21, 2018 at 7:32:17 AM PST", "subject": "Pro Rata: Wednesday, February 21", "body": "View in browser\n\nPro Rata\n\nBy Kia Kokalitcheva -Feb 21, 2018\n\nWelcome back, readers. Once again, a reminder to send me your delicious scoops\nand tips at [email protected] or find me on Twitter at @imkialikethecar."}]	2
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029269.txt_23890	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029269.txt	Fwd: woody and deadline	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["soon yi previn"], "timestamp": "5/4/2016 6:28:25 PM", "subject": "Fwd: woody and deadline", "body": "22?"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 4, 2016 at 2:25 PM", "subject": "woody and deadline", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nWoody has received from his lawyer some questions I asked in in response to the agreement Irwin Tenenbaum\nsent me....I found that that agreement generous and reasonable (!), and I'm excited to go forward, but I do need\nthose clarifications. We can absolutely agree that we will not give Woody larger or more important billing than\nBill Clinton or Joe Biden, and that I'd like to come to him to renew our agreement after five years.\n\nThe Harvard week of content in which Woody will appear, if we can sign this, needs to be edited in the next\n\nweek-10 days. We are out of time, which is why I'm writing\n\nThe television show has been picked up by American Public Television, they will distribute nationally, and\n\nthey've asked for another 5 episodes. I so want Woody to be one of those.\n\nI'd like to see the haiku written by computer. Haiku is not that hard. I'd like to see an elegy written by\n\ncomputer."}]	2
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032302.txt_23895	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032302.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "10/1/2016 2:09:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I can chat now. Or if not, when works?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 5:34 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "time to talk today, ? now that the book is a dud, no trump, clinton etc. I woudl like to move forward."}]	2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032912.txt_23898	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032912.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Erika Kellerhals"], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 6:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-"}, {"sender": "Erika Kellerhals [email protected]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "But holy shit you were spot on about trump!\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Erika Kellerhals"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:14:49 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yup"}]	3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032464.txt_23905	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032464.txt	Fwd: TR: update	[{"sender": "Etienne Binant <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 9:49 PM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Gentlemen \nI hope you are having a great week. \nIn LA hoping to begin acquiring pieces: are we on? \nIf not yet, when please \nthanks"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 10, 2017 12:32", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "going to artists studio s much more appropriate , i think"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:59 AM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Hi Jeffrey \nHappy to talk to you almost anytime today until around 3PM. Just tell me what number I should reach. \nNot sure what got lost in translation here: never had the intention to go to any art fair or art show or \nanything of the kind. \nAll the artists we have in mind or send to you are people we have direct connections with. Not just their\nstudio, but also their home. They are people the work of whom we follow, and many of them are already \nfriendly (Arianna, Cali have had dinner or stayed home). \nThe idea is absolutely to have an impact on the ecosystem and to make a difference by supporting great \nartists when they need it. \nGalleries references are important, because galleries allow artist to reach a broader audience. We would go\ndirectly to the source. \nThis is why it's important for me to go to LA or Berlin (or elsewhere) because those artists are not rich yet, \nthey dont travel so much. They belong to a scene, and it does make a big difference to them if you connect in \nperson. \nThe spirit is to have an impact on young, talented folks, and absolutely to stay at the source. \nOnce again, not sure was drifted away from this in communication \nE"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant", "Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "vendredi 10 feyrier 2017 18:40", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "yes, lets start. . yes we are on. sorry with trump around its been very crazy busy"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "February 14, 2017 at 8:18:41 PM EST", "subject": "TR: update", "body": "Dear Darren \nLatest from JE (indeed, encouraging) \nPlease let me know when account/wire are active, and how I can access internet banking and start the ball (in \nfact, it has started) \nall the best"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "2/15/2017 11:11:40 AM", "subject": "Fwd: TR: update", "body": ""}]	6
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032214.txt_23906	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032214.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "10:07:32 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Agreed"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Lajcak Miroslav/MINISTER/MZV"], "timestamp": "sobota, marca 24, 2018 6:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}]	2
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028605.txt_23909	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028605.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 4:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "in this communication is\nconfidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may\nconstitute inside information, and is intended only for\nthe use of the addressee. It is the property of\n\nJEE\n\nUnauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this\ncommunication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited\nand may be unlawful. If you have received this\ncommunication in error, please notify us immediately by\nreturn e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and\ndestroy this communication and all copies thereof,\nincluding all attachments."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re:", "body": "im off to europe , tomorrow."}]	2
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022827.txt_23913	IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022827.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "the story teller , crafted much of it out of whole cloth. . part of her story , is that she was\nat multiple orgies with clinton and speciifically, the minute details of a dinner had on the island with\nhim, \"he sat on my left. came by black. heli. flown by ghislaine. clinton was NEVER EVER\nthere, never. it punches a hole in the dershowitz , andrew allegation. making it all apparent that it was\nfantasy. and delusional. thoughts. who should break the story."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Is Clinton willing to say he was not there? Btw, I've just filed a column for USA Today for Monday\nexplaining how Dershowitz and Andrew allegations were picked up from unverified civil court docs,\ntransferred to UK tabs, which go wild because of no libel rules on U.S. court papers, and then translated back\nhere as \"reported fact.\" Problem with ]story is that tabs are too invested in present story line, and\nunlikely that the Times or WSJ will want to touch it--tho, depending on who is willing to on record, they\nmight. There is another politico reporter I know who might do it, again, if the on-the-record sources are\npublic people. Or, I will use it for New York Magazine, but that won't be until Feb. Can you still talk\ntomorrow? When works? Woody and Soon-Yi coming for dinner tonight. m"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "anytime tomorw ok"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:22 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Can you talk at noon? Probably need about 30 minutes. What is best number?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "1/10/2015 2:57:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ME 2k: tren"}]	5
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031735.txt_23914	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031735.txt	Trump; Prince of Believers .docx	[{"sender": "aziza alah madi", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "5/20/2017 9:48:34 AM", "subject": "Trump; Prince of Believers .docx", "body": "Attachments: Trump; Prince of Believers .docx; Untitled attachment 454977.htm\n\nImportance: — High\n\nhttps://www.google.ca/amp/www.cnbc.com/amp/2017/05/20/saudi-aramco-ceo-says-to-sign-50-billion-of-\ndeals-with-u-s-companies.html\n\nhttp://www.argaam.com/en/article/articledetail/id/486123"}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030785.txt_23920	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030785.txt	Re: How Close Is Donald Trump to a Psychiatric Breakdown?	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 10:43:53 AM", "subject": "Re: How Close Is Donald Trump to a Psychiatric Breakdown?", "body": "sums it up well. , needs to add melania. pressure, bibi indictment. jared money grubbing. recipe \nfor tragedy"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 4:08 AM", "subject": "Re: How Close Is Donald Trump to a Psychiatric Breakdown?", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}]	2
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029255.txt_23922	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029255.txt	Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Alan M. Dershowitz", "Roy Blac Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "4/28/2016 4:39:12 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberr", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "April 28, 2016 at 12:14:37 PM EDT", "subject": "RE: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Sorry, the suit is attached to this email."}, {"sender": "Ingram, David (Reuters News)", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:14 PM", "subject": "Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Marty,\n\nThe attached lawsuit was filed this week in federal court in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and another man, Donald Trump, raped her in 1994. We’re planning to publish a story on the suit this afternoon, and we want to make sure it is fair. Is Mr. Epstein available to speak? Or do you want to offer a comment on this behalf?\n\nMy number \| and I’m available any time. I also just tried your cell phone.\nThank you in advance.\n\nDavid Ingram\nCorrespondent\n\nReuters News\n\nThomson Reuters"}]	4
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033020.txt_23931	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033020.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "White House this week?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 6:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Probably won't know until tomorrow. Waiting on both Jared and Trump. Can you chat? have something to ask."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "9/3/2017 5:25:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "sent you his book cover, he has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. on the short list."}]	3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032458.txt_23937	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032458.txt	RE: update	[{"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "2/10/2017 5:40:45 PM", "subject": "RE: update", "body": "666"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant", "Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "vendredi 10 fevrier 2017 18:40:10", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "yes, lets start. . yes we are on. sorry with trump around it been very crazy busy"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant"], "timestamp": "vendredi 10 fevrier 2017 12:32", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "going to artists studio s much more appropriate , i think"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 9:49 PM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Gentlemen\nI hope you are having a great week.\nIn LA hoping to begin acquiring pieces: are we on?\nIf not yet, when please\nthanks"}]	4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019465.txt_23938	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019465.txt	Fw: Oscar Diary	[{"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "3/7/2013 2:03:11 PM", "subject": "Fw: Oscar Diary", "body": "I am struggling thru this. It is so late already. I am so stressed out. Will finishe is in a day or two.. I can not write about the Katzenberg party. Maybe can just mention is happened in my hotel. But the reason to go was to support Katzenberg and network. More to come. Peg"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Thursday, March 07, 2013 08:51 AM", "subject": "Oscar Diary", "body": "It's Thursday morning on Wilshire Boulevard and the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences has just opened it's doors for ticket pick-up for the 85th Oscar telecast. \n\nForty voting members, the distinguished director Norman Jewison and I are on a long single file line that snakes thru the lobby patiently waiting to go upstairs to pick up our tickets. My seats were awarded via a lottery system. We clutch our photo I.D. \n\nSuddenly, a messenger slips in wearing a smart khaki windbreaker and cuts through the line. He announces to the uniformed guard in a stage whisper, \"Dreamworks\", and as if Steven Spielberg himself had just delivered the Gettysburg address, is ushered upstairs. \n\nThat is the final act of social justice of the \"Lincoln\" campaign. \n\nI am sleep deprived and jet lagged having just spent six hours on a flight sitting next Paula Wagner who is Tom Cruise's ex-agent turned Broadway producer for Jessica Chastain's \"The Heiress\". We discuss Jessica's not so great chances to beat Jennifer Lawrence for Best Actress. I mention Harvey Weinstein's concern about Emmanuel Riva's last minute surge. The French phenomena doesn't speak English, has never been to L.A. and it's like voting for a ghost, even on her 86th birthday. \n\nThis is the year I got phone calls in September from top studio executives announcing each are winning the Oscar. Their euphoric giddiness is due to the quality of the films resulting in the priciest oscar campaigns on record and astounding audience support at the theaters. \n\nSeven of the nine best picture nominees have taken in well over $100 million at the domestic box office to date, but it's the worldwide numbers in the millions that are staggering. \n\nTwentieth Century Fox's \"Life of Pi\" caused a tsunami at $595, Universal's \"Les Miserables\" scored $412, the Weinstein Cos.' \"Django Unchained\" whipped up $395, DreamWorks' \"Lincoln\" delivered at $254, Warner's \"Argo\" captured $219, Weinstein's \"Silver Lining Playbook\" danced to $187 and Sony's \"Zero Dark Thirty\" killed at $107 million. \n\nIn comparison, Sony Classics' \"Amour\" received $19 and Fox Searchlights' \"Beast of the Southern Wild\" worked up $19 million. \n\nHugh audiences having actually seen the films this year have an ear for the nuances of the Oscar race and everyone including Ben Affleck follow the bloggers religiously. \n\nSo by Thursday morning on line at the Academy the informed buzz was as follows: \"Argo\" takes best picture because is was most entertaining. The director snub to Ben Affleck was a Godsend as George Clooney's advice came from far away Berlin where he was in pre-production on \"The Monuments Men\". Warner's president Sue Kroll kept the campaign clean and calm on the home front. \n\n\"Lincoln's\" victory is Daniel Day Lewis from day one of shooting, no pun intended. The suggestion that Obama is our answer to Lincoln was interesting. Voters knew Obama secretly hosted three screenings in the White House, but they weren't invited. The Hollywood Foreign press were the biggest winners with Bill Clinton's surprise appearance on their broadcast. DreamWorks' ran an impeccable patriotic campaign that the media ate up. \n\nThe best director race had the most drama. Hollywood dreaded Spielberg loosing to Ang Lee. (Eventually everyone was thrilled Steven was anointed president of the Cannes Jury for 2013 the day after the awards show.) \n\nThe voters knew beloved Ang Lee's three year boat ride was the technical miracle. Fox's $595 million international box office blew in the win. \n\nHarvey Weinstein having three horses running is always the most talked about. His loquacious Quentin Taratino was a lock for screenplay. Best supporting actor was a total toss up with a sentimental edge to Robert DeNiro. We even applauded Bob putting his handprints in cement in front of Grauman's Chinese Theater. \n\nThe conversations continued about how our government put the cabasch on \"Zero Dark Thirty\" with their arrogant denial of enhanced interrogation. Even MPAA President Chris Dodd could not help Mark Boal, Katherine Bigalow and Amy Pascal. \n\nAdditional chatter was the renewed last minute love for \"Les Miserables\". Clearly the most polarizing film in the race, this 27 year old theatrical musical seen by 60 million fans is now the talk of the Oscar weekend. \n\nHugh Jackman, Anne Hathaway, Russell Crowe, Amanda Segfried, Eddie Redmayne, Sasha Baron Cohen, Helena Bonham Carter and Samanthe Barks are making an historic one time live performance as part of Sunday's television broadcast. Producers Craig Zadan and Neil Meron's will attempt to razzel dazzel us with an homage to movie musicals for three plus hours at the Dolby theater. \n\nBarbra Streisand, Adele and Shirley Basse's appearances also create high anxiety and a blood bath for tickets...hence the hysteria created by DreamWorks' messenger cutting the line. \n\nAfter checking into the iconic Beverly Hills Hotel, my home away from home for 30 years of Oscar weekends and meticulously laying out all the ensembles sent from Valentino and Ralph Rucci, I hit the party circuit overdressed for life."}]	2
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032228.txt_23940	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032228.txt	Heads up	[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "12/16/2015 1:00:36 AM", "subject": "Heads up", "body": "I hear CNN planning to ask Trump tonight about his relationship with you--either on air or in scrum afterwards."}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030578.txt_23958	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030578.txt	Re: Fwd: <no subject>	[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 8 2011 10:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: <no subject>", "body": "Call me"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue Mar 08 17:48:01 2011", "subject": "Fwd: <no subject>", "body": ""}, {"sender": "gmax <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["J Jep <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:17 PM", "subject": "<no subject>", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance\nhttp://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/notes- on-new-yorks-oddest- couple-j effrey- ep stein- and-\nghislaine-maxwell.html\nby Vicky Ward http://www.vanityfair.com/contributors/vicky- ward\nMarch 8, 2011, 2:30 PM\n\"I've got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I've just been.\nYou will never think the same way about anything again.\"\nSo spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up\neverywhere at the moment as the alleged \"procurer\" of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.\nEpstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of\nanother investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with\nallegations that he molested them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British\nnewspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein's friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to\npublicly disassociate himself from his old pal.\nI wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called \"The Talented Mr. Epstein.\" It was largely a business piece that\nfocused on his mysterious exit from Bear Steams in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les\nWexner, the chairman of Limited Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude\nHoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of\n$450 million.\nThe piece alluded to Epstein's great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women\nwith whom he had sexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn't really go there, focusing instead on the\nissue that remains a mystery—how Jeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers.\nThis is not to say I didn't hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I\nconcentrated on the intriguing financial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same\nones, different ones. And their stories are bone-chilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one\ncase, flown—to ask me about Epstein and Maxwell. Who is he? And the British, especially, want to know:\nWho is she? At this point, I am so bored of repeating myself to others—it was, after all, my 2003 Vanity\nFairstory that really brought him into the limelight—that I have decided to write about this myself\nBizarrely, perhaps, I have gotten to know Jeffrey and Ghislaine far better after my piece than before it. I kept\nrunning into both of them, separately, at parties. Jeffrey is not a social animal so he usually has a couple of\nyoung women with him who stand two feet behind him, as if serving a monarch. \"Do they speak?\" I remember\nasking him once, nodding at his lookalike blondes. He laughed. \"Not like you,Vicky,\" was his riposte.\nI remembered that when we'd once discussed math—in particular, an isosceles triangle—and I revealed I\nhadn't studied math since I was 14 (such is, or was, the way of the British educational system), I received a\npackage at home via messenger. It was a book: \"Math for idiots.\"\nSo he is not without humor, even though he doesn't drink or smoke, and hates restaurants.\n\"Jeffrey knows a good deal about most subjects,\" newspaper publisher Mort Zuckerman told me last week. He\nwas certainly preaching to the converted. The truth is, Epstein does know a lot about a lot of things. Just a few\nmoments in his company and you know this to be true.\nWhen I saw pictures of Prince Andrew walking in Central Park with Jeffrey, my immediate thought was that\n\"Andy\"—as Jeffrey calls him—is probably asking for help with his role as British trade envoy, or whatever his\nstrange title is. Because if one thing's for sure: When it comes to international business, Jeffrey knows what\nhe's talking about far more than \"Andy\" does. Which is why Leon Black, Mort Zuckerman and a few other\nfinanciers hang out with him.\nAnd Ghislaine?\nFull disclosure: I like her. Most people in New York do. It's almost impossible not to.\nShe is always the most interesting, the most vivacious, the most unusual person in any room. I've spent hours\ntalking to her about the third world at a bar until 2am. She is as passionate as she is knowledgeable. She is\ncurious. She has spent weeks at the bottom of the ocean, literally going deeper than anyone else. She has sent\nme a DVD of the fish there. Her rolodex would blow away almost anyone else's I can think of—probably even\nRupert Murdochs'. She is very well-read and can talk about most things for hours. She is passionate about Bill\nClinton with whom she is close friends.\nYet, touchingly, when she had to give a speech at the 40th birthday party of her best friend, Ariadne Calvo-\nPlatero, (known fondly to her close friends as \"the Tennis Goddess\") Ghislaine shook a little with nerves. When\nit comes down to things she really cares about—and Ariadne is one of them—Ghislaine shows her\nvulnerability.\nAnd that vulnerability is key to understanding her friendship with Jeffrey.\n\"He saved her,\" I remember a close friend of mine telling me. \"When her father died, she was a wreck;\ninconsolable. And then Jeffrey took her in. She's never forgotten that—and never will.\"\nIn many ways, the socially awkward Epstein with his big house, plane, island and ranch was the perfect\nreplacement for her father, the late Robert Maxwell, newspaper tycoon and criminal. Sure, Jeffrey had his\nsexual pecadillos, but then Ghislaine's father was not without his oddities. After all, it was he who died leaving\na massive \"black hole\" he'd fraudulently created. To Ghislaine, Jeffrey's habits may not have seemed that\nstrange.\nIn fact, she probably figured, rather like I have, after years of writing about he very rich, that most successful\npeople in the end either have some weird habit (the late Bruce Wasserstein had the weight issues, the girl issues,\nand moved countries to avoid paying tax), or they break the law (Sam Waksal, Martha Stewart.) You don't\ntend to get to the top by being the world's most balanced human being. Even the folksy Warren Buffett didn't\nquite manage a normal life—whatever that is. He had a second \"wife\" for many years whose existence he has\nbeen open about.\nSo what to make of the current fuss over Ghislaine? I haven't spoken to her or to Jeffrey, but I suspect that her\nloyalty to friends like Bill Clinton will keep her in good stead, in the end, she'll be out and about as always.\nLook at Waksal and Stewart. No one sees them and thinks: criminal. Au contraire. In this city, money makes up\nfor all sorts of blemishes."}]	3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032869.txt_23968	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032869.txt	Re: The book on you...	[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:25 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "Keep getting calls from that guy doing a book on you -- John Connolly. He seems very interested in your relationship with the news media. I told him you were a hell of a guy:) One oddity: he said he had been told that that quote from Trump about you in the original NY Mag story had been manufactured. ie, that I did not actually speak to Donald. Which is bull shit of course. I am sure that is what Trump told him as they have been getting a lot of questions from reporters about you. He actually seemed to be a sensible guy/solid reporter -- just from the few conversations I had with him. I think he is close to finishing up. Did you ever speak to him?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:28 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "no"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Jun 1, 2016, at 11:46 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "are you still getting calls from reporters re Trump?"}, {"sender": "Story [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Landon Thomas"], "timestamp": "6/1/2016 3:47:12 PM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "every day"}]	4
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033167.txt_23970	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033167.txt	Trump-Clinton debate expected to shatter records \| TheHill	[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "9/21/2016 12:01:29 PM", "subject": "Trump-Clinton debate expected to shatter records \| TheHill", "body": "http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/2968 18-trump-clinton-debate-expected-to-shatter-ratings-records"}]	1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033173.txt_23980	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033173.txt	null	[{"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "10/3/2016 11:10:56 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Hi Jeffrey long time now hear don't sweat Patterson was with trump last week small dinner he really would\nmake a good financial steward no agenda woody is busting his ass for him Rudy too wiki leaks tonight on\nHillary stopped caring fed wants to raise I guess terrible luck brexit Deutschebank then probably some terror\nthing smart to be out of it best jonathan"}]	1
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021556.txt_23988	IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021556.txt	31E-MM-108062, 08/07/2008	[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Miami"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "31E-MM-108062, 08/07/2008", "body": "Please deliver the enclosed letter and brouchures to\nIn addition, please confirm completion of this\n\nmatter.\nRead and Clear"}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031114.txt_23990	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031114.txt	The J.P. Morgan View: Local forces are dominating	[{"sender": "[email protected]", "recipients": ["Undisclosed recipients"], "timestamp": "3/29/2013 8:48:11 PM", "subject": "The J.P. Morgan View: Local forces are dominating", "body": "Global Asset Allocation \n\nThe J.P. Morgan View: Local forces are dominating\n\n* Asset allocation –– Local risks and opportunities trump global forces in driving investment opportunities. Cross-market correlations to remain much lower than in recent years. \n\n* Economics –– US activity data are coming in better than hoped, but we need another 1-2 months to see how consumers are responding to higher taxes. \n\n* Fixed Income –– Search for carry to trump Euro area jitters over time.\n\n* Equities –– Japan remains our main country overweight. \n\n* Credit –– We OW covered bonds in the Euro periphery over senior bank bonds and subordinated vs senior bank bonds in the core.\n\n* Currencies –– Cyprus to have minimal further impact on EUR, but a ECB rate cut would push it a few cents lower versus the dollar.\n\n* Commodities –– Stay long Brent and short gasoline. \n\n* US stocks continue to gain, with the benchmark S&P500 breaching its all time high level today in a gentle fashion. Bonds are generally up this week on dovish comments from both the Fed and the BoJ. Commodities have gained also, but credit remains the troubled asset class with spreads wider in most markets, especially in EM external debt. \n\n* Our overall investment theme remains that there is no overarching global investment theme anymore this year but instead a number of unrelated local forces that have largely local impact. The generalized asset reflation we saw last year, with risk premia coming down consistently across the globe and asset classes, was due to a gradual fading of tail risks that has since been largely completed. “Risk-on, risk- off is so last year”. \n\n* In addition, we are seeing no momentum either way in global growth, price or earnings expectations that could put us into a bullish or bearish growth story. Our 2.4% projection for 2013 world economic growth is unchanged since November. YTD activity data for the world are tracking our 2.6% forecast for Q1, comfortably up from the dismal 1.6% in Q4 of last year. Amidst offsetting up- and downside surprises in the US and Japan versus Europe, there has been no reason yet to raise the growth profile for the year as a whole. We hope, but need evidence first.\n\n* Without a global growth or fading-of-tail-risks force, we are left with a set of local issues and opportunities that are having a local impact, at the regional, asset class and company level, that should leave the rest of the world largely unmoved. In this environment, correlations across regions and risk markets should remain significantly lower than in past years. Various markets may seem to behave “inconsistently” with others, but we caution against expecting simple mean reversion, given our view of the reduced impact of global factors. Active investors should pay more attention to local fundamentals while long-term investors can expect to achieve greater gains from cross-market and international diversification.\n\n* Local issues must be monitored and understood, though, to decide how to allocate capital and risk. Just to review a few, Japanese policy makers continue to present a concerted plan to reflate their economy through monetary, fiscal and structural measures. The strong control of the government and its high approval rating are steadily raising the chance of success. We stay overweight Japanese equities and grow wary of the short yen trade, as capital inflows and rising growth expectations (chart of right) are ultimately bullish for the currency. Watch next week’s BoJ meeting, led by newly appointed Governor Kuroda, for new reflationary measures. \n\n* The Euro area economy remains in recession, while policy makers are making little effort to reverse the contraction. We monitor signs of any large deposit flight post Cyprus over coming weeks and months to judge whether the bailout may actually be worsening conditions in the Euro. Economic forecast momentum remains negative (chart of right). These are good reasons to underweight the Euro area, if not all of Europe, across asset classes, against the rest of the world. \n\n* The US, in contrast, is seeing better spending from both corporates and consumers than we could have expected post Fiscal Cliff and sequestration. But given the huge amount of fiscal drag, which is a fact, we want to see another 1-2 months of data before extrapolating the good news. It did support US equities in recent weeks, which continue to benefit from US corporates issuing debt to buy their own shares and others', through M&A. This corporate rotation from debt to equities is almost exclusively a US flow, which helps explain US equity outperformance. \n\n* Across risk assets, we are similarly seeing huge delinking, with equities rallying greatly and commodities and credit seeing no gains (chart p. 1), very much unlike last year. Commodities are delinking as there are no growth upgrades in EM, and inflation concerns are concentrated on two countries, UK and Japan. Credit is delinking as most investors are massively overweight credit versus equities, as evidenced by the disparity in buying flows in 2011-12. Relevering by US corporate and the Fed debating the end of QE are signaling that the 3-decade long rally in bonds is likely over. Investors are starting to dollar-average away from bonds to equities. \n\nFixed Income\n\n* Bonds rallied again, except for Euro area peripherals, the source of this week’s market concerns. The imposition of capital controls on Cypriot deposits is to be sure a watershed moment, but for now not one we expect to spark significant deposit withdrawals elsewhere. Meanwhile, the most likely outcome to the Italian impasse appears to be new elections in the autumn. With seemingly little prospect of a material rise in yields on the safest assets, we think the search for carry evident across the full gamut of asset markets will see peripheral spreads narrow over time. \n\n* Ten-year JGB yields have rallied to within a few bps of their all-time low, ahead of next week’s inaugural meeting for the new BoJ leadership. We do indeed expect aggressive easing, with JGB purchases out to 30 years, but think this will be trumped by profit taking in JGBs after the fiscal year end. \n\n* Our latest Inflation Expectations Survey (F. Diamond, K. Gupta) was out yesterday. One interesting result is that almost 90% of respondents believe the BoJ has less than a 50/50 shot of hitting its 2% inflation target in two years, a reflection of the formidable challenge of sparking inflation expectations after two decades of falling prices. \n\nEquities\n\n* The global rally in equity markets slowed this week, but did not reverse, on continued concerns about the fallout from a poorly executed Cyprus solution. The Euro area underperformed again, for a second week in a row. As discussed last week, we view Cyprus as a local problem that we address by underweighting Euro area equities in a global portfolio. A potential negative feedback loop from markets to the economy poses a serious downside risk for Euro area growth over coming months prolonging the current run of negative economic surprises from the region.\n\n* Japan is the region we like the most. In our mind the Japanese equity trade has further legs not only due to prospective BoJ balance sheet expansion but more importantly due to a reform agenda to be unveiled into the summer. \n\n* EM equities are suffering from renewed policy tightening in major EM economies such as Brazil and China. Investors have bitter memories of previous property tightening measures in China. As within DM, we see a lot of divergences within EM and prefer to focus on under-owned markets with good domestic demand story such as Mexico and Malaysia. See “Consensus Asset Allocation”, Adrian Mowat and team, Mar 26th. Open overweights in Mexican and Malaysia equities vs MSCI EM.\n\n* For long-term investors we just released our quarterly publication \"Trade opportunities for long term investors\" Mar 27. We monetize risk premia in Value stocks via a long in S&P500 Value vs S&P500 ETFs. It appears that a five year long underperformance of Value stocks has come to an end. We take profit on trades that monetize skew risk premia in S&P500 due to sharp contraction over the past quarter. We continue to monetize equity risk premia via buying high dividend yield equity ETFs against USTs. Our preference is to buy ETFs which track the S&P US Preferred stock due to its high yield, around 6%, and its high weight on Financials. \n\nCredit\n\n* The news flow from the Cypriot bailout continued to push spreads wider and vol higher this week, with European Financials underperforming as creditor bail-in risks returned to the forefront. iTraxx senior and subordinated financials indices widened 20bp as investors sought to hedge via CDS rather than sell bonds. European credit continued to underperformed US credit.\n\n* The fact that Cypriot banks debt is only 1.3% of total liabilities was a key factor in the decision to bail-in depositors. Yet events surrounding the banking sector restructuring also suggest that keeping senior unsecured bondholders immune from costly bail-outs is politically untenable. This removes the implicit ‘cover’ that senior bonds holders have enjoyed and has increased speculation that implementation of the bail-in proposals under the EU’s Resolution & Recovery Directive (RRD) will be brought forward to 2015 from the current 2018 time-frame.\n\n* As such, our colleagues in European Credit have examined the implications of changing recovery rate expectations across the bank capital structure. Assuming that covered bonds remain outside the scope of the proposals, we expect senior bank bond spreads to widen relative to covered bonds and prefer being OW covered bonds vs senior bonds in the periphery, particularly in Spain where covered bonds have first claim over the entire mortgage book of the bank. From a relative value point of view, we also suggest owning subordinated bank bonds vs senior bank bonds in the core as, under the new RRD regime, there is a higher probability than before that senior bank bond holders will lose money and this risk is, in our mind, not yet in the price (Rethinking the capital structure, R. Henriques et al., Mar 27).\n\nForeign Exchange\n\n* Today’s research note, Sacrificing Cyprus, examines several presumptions which have arisen over the past two weeks due to the Cyprus crisis, and scores them on a scale of truths, half-truths and falsehoods. There are indeed some right conclusions to draw from this experience, but also some wrong ones. As examples, it is true that capital controls have created a two-tier euro, but very unlikely that Cyprus is exiting EMU. And while it is true that markets deserve a risk premium for policy uncertainty, the size of the premium should be much lower than in previous crises due to backstops like the OMT.\n\n* For example, during the first Greek crisis in May 2010 EUR undershot by 10% relative to cyclical conditions at that time, and during Greek elections in May 2012 the currency undershot by 5%. The combination of Italian and Cypriot events have eliminated the euro’s overvaluation from early 2013, when the currency spiked to the high $1.30s on a presumption that LTRO funds would be repaid rapidly, driving European rates higher. The currency is now close to fair value, so carries no risk premium for contagion. The message is similar in vol markets: the 1% premium for 3-mo implied versus realized vol is far less than the 5% premium witnessed during previous crises. \n\n* While there is no evidence that the EUR/USD cash or options market carries a risk premium, it is also true that the required premium should probably be far less than in previous crises given that a sovereign funding backstop like the OMT is in place. We are thus reluctant to extrapolate this mini-crisis into a systemic event which triggers broad deleveraging, or to forecast trend euro weakness. The currency could trade down a couple of cents around an ECB rate cut, but assuming that fears around Cyprus contagion pass in a month or two, the currency should reverse its recent decline by the summertime. \n\nCommodities \n\n* Commodities rallied this week, up almost 2%, led by energy. We went tactically long Brent in last week’s J.P. Morgan View as we believed that the correction in oil markets had brought prices too far below our price forecast of $112/bbl. Since then Brent is up around 1.5%. We stay long and expect further price appreciation over coming months. We are also short gasoline vs. Brent. Gasoline cracks (the premium for gasoline over crude prices) spiked over the first three months of the year due to a combination of low inventories and refinery closures that came during refinery maintenance season. As refinery maintenance comes to a close and demand falls seasonally, gasoline prices should fall relative to Brent. \n\n* We went long Soybean time spreads late last year (GMOS, Dec 5) on a view that much higher Brazilian supplies would find it difficult to leave the country due to logistical constraints. Since then we have seen a record number of ships planning to load soybeans in Brazilian ports and this number is still rising. The average waiting time before loading is also rising, now 38 days compared to 26 days a month ago. This has caused the front Soybean contract to rally while longer maturity contracts have been depressed by the much higher than normal supply inside the country. The spread between the May-13 and Jul-13 contracts has doubled since we put the trade on in December. We stay long as we think these logistical issues are unlikely to be resolved anytime soon."}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029983.txt_23993	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029983.txt	RE: ICYMI	[{"sender": "Reid Hoffman", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:03 AM", "subject": "ICYMI", "body": "ICYMI\nMy occasional roundup of interesting links and\nwriting I've shared — in case you missed them. :)\nNew and Notable\n* We are thrilled to welcome Sarah Tavel to Greylock Partners. LINK\n* And also very excited to welcome lynda.com to the LinkedIn team!\nLINK\n* Change.org celebrates its 100 million users milestone. Emily Chang discuss this and more with CEO\nBen Rattray on Bloomberg West: LINK\n* Byron Auguste launched Opportunity@Work, a new civic enterprise aimed at \"rewiring the U.S. labor\nmarket.\" Tom Friedman's post: LINK\n* Mimi Ito launched Connected Camps, a summer online coding camp using Minecraft.\nLINK\nWorthwhile Reads\n* Jeff Weiner: How LinkedIn is Helping Power the President's Tech Jobs Initiative\nLINK\n* The New Yorker: R U There? - Nancy Lublin and Crisis Text Line LINK\n* Fast Company: Inside Obama's Stealth Startup LINK\n* Jerry Chen: The Age of Developer-Defined Infrastructure LINK\n* Sheryl Sandberg's powerful tribute to Dave Goldberg. LINK\nSome of My Recent Essays\n* Wired: Why the block chain matters LINK\n* Financial Times: Acquiring proven entrepreneurs is a smart way to innovate\nLINK\n* Press Start to Continue: One More Role of Founders LINK\nTo Watch\n* My conversation with Peter Thiel at CEIBS LINK\n* I enjoyed participating in this fun video by Founders Forum imagining what life would be like for\ntech entrepreneurs if the World Wide Web had never been invented. LINK\nInterviews\n* Vox: My discussion with Ezra Klein on the biggest lie employers tell employees\nLINK\n* Entrepreneur: Why I'm betting big on Bitcoin LINK\n* HuffPo: My discussion with Dawn Nakagawa in advance of the WorldPost conference\nLINK"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Reid Hoffman"], "timestamp": "Sunday, July 05, 2015 2:30 PM", "subject": "Re: ICYMI", "body": "heyy it looks like your diet program has worked"}, {"sender": "Reid Hoffman", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "7/6/2015 5:04:31 PM", "subject": "RE: ICYMI", "body": "slow progress.\nplanning to see you in August.\nHope you're well."}]	3
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021230.txt_24001	IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021230.txt	Re: July 22	[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "6/27/2009 11:22:50 AM", "subject": "Re: July 22", "body": "now is fine"}, {"sender": "Jeevacation <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Sat Jun 27 07:04:52 2009", "subject": "Re: July 22", "body": "Call me this afternoon\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Jun 26, 2009, at 5:23 PM", "subject": "Re: July 22", "body": "So I go to a designer's cocktail party last night and Jonanthan and Kimberly Farkus are there telling me about your coming home\ncelebration and there might be on seat left on his cousin's plane....do you know about this?\n\nI mentioned that you said there was no \"release\" party...\n\nIam coming if there is one- if you don't a \"surprise\" event- you might want to get into this.\nYour friends are counting the days to freedom...\n\nWent to Heyward Isham's funeral today...father of Ralph and Chris...very sad. Old wasp diplomat who was our Ambassador to\nHaiti in 60's- sounds like CIA....is CIA\n\nGoing to dinner with Amy Irving, her husband and Mario Platero, a brilliant Italian G@ewish) journalist- very chic- wife in\nEngand- he travels with Obama...runs big news agency here- very funny- you will love him- will introduce in your new life..\n\nCannes Diary finally went to press...\n\nWas in LA for 3 days of meetings with every studio...working hard for the business...it's there, but it'a like begging to get them\nto spend so we spend our days getting underwriting...thank God I have a guy in the office that does this...\n\nPoured all day in Hamptons- sun just came out...\n\nMiss you...\nxoxo Peg"}]	3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027038.txt_24008	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027038.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:50 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "does the 23 work in cambridge"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:59 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Absolutely. 23rd is great. I teach my seminar that day at 1 but could tape in the morning or after class--in my office (very private), or at the Harvardx studios (less) or in the Woodberry poetry room (the nicest place). . If Woody wanted, we could bring some students into the taping or just do the two of us... Woody is absolutely welcome to come to the seminar, of course John McCain, Tony Kushner, Al Gore have all signed on the last 2 days...crazy"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Or we could do the taping at my house. That would be totally delightful too"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 5, 2013, at 8:36 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "how much time should i allocate?"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "10/6/2013 2:59:43 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Jeffrey, For taping in Cambridge? For breakfast and taping at my house. Depends on what woody is up for. My ideal would be a 1/2 hour-40 minute conversation, but we could do a quick taping in 15 minutes ...my team can be ready And , just to remind,could also come to do taping in ny on 24th because I'm coming to New York the evening of 23rd for a YIVO event--to which you would both be most welcome I'm sure (YIVO is the largest collection of materials from Jewish Eastern Europe)"}]	5
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029015.txt_24009	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029015.txt	Re: Trump	[{"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 2:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Jeff\nHow plausible is idea that trump is real cocaine user?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Oct 2, 2016 at 2:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "can somoene from the development office show rothschild around harvard sat.?"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Sunday, 2 October 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Yes. Let's briefly discuss. Can u have her write me."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Oct 2, 2016, at 8:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "LH", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "10/2/2016 12:34:29 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "What number r u at?"}]	5
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026326.txt_24010	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026326.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "J <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 2:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "if the republicans pull this off, steve would deserve most of the credit. . he was way out in front on this way out. . . execution not to his liking but on another note , what were you thinking about me in the book, with what moniker"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff <1>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 8:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I was thinking of opening with you and Bannon talking about Trump. Would let you sound smart and offer what I think would be a crowd-pleasing perspective, and make you seem like a credible player--former friend of Trump, advisor to world leaders, sought after person, etc--without having to too much rehash old stuff Doesn't seem like they can win...but who knows. I'm meeting Bannon had 3 tomorrow and will stay with him until the end."}, {"sender": "J <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 3:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thnks for letting me sound smart:)"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "11/5/2018 8:25:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I haven't done that party yet..."}]	4
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029094.txt_24011	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029094.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["reid"], "timestamp": "Jun 1, 2017, at 6:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "when 7 told reid that obama just wanted to make money, he thought i was being cynical, as he was sure that doing good was going to be the goal\n\nhttps://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/31/us/obama-buys-house-washington-kalorama.html"}, {"sender": "Joi", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "6/1/2017 12:12:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "me)"}]	2
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020660.txt_24021	IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020660.txt	Missing message	[{"sender": "Robert Trivers FS", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "12/22/2018 8:21:20 PM", "subject": "Missing message", "body": "no evidence you got the latest so i have sent you just the key message itself—rather long so 1 have put in bold\nthe only references to Enhanced Learning Foundation—references had to do with paying Amy Jacobson 30\ngrand for a year of work on Honour killings—my own expenses covered by myself\n\nof course i know little or nothing about stocks but i do feel like Trump is nothing but bad news for them, which\n\nfrightens me, given that he has 2 more years—it has cost me >$100,000 recently not for obvious economic\nreasons but because it looks like we have no one sensible in charge of the whole country\n\nDecember 16\n\nam good so far\n\nhad a very productive two days with my research assistant Amy Jacobson in New Jersey\nwe now have 60+ papers on honour killings in Jersey and another 20 in Jamaica\nespecially important areas are Pakistan, Turkey (Kurds), Saudi Arabia and India\n\nlots of variation in mating system, form of homicide, reasons given, frequency of multiple victims and/or\nmultiple perpetrators, degree of retribution and so on\n\nam working out the logical details on inheritance—females seem invariably to count for 1/2 of what a male does\nin Islam\n\nparallel-cousin marriages—father's brother—occur in the desserts of Saudi Arabia—it radiated out from there\nwith Islam—such systems are selected in competition with each other, as in Iraq—two paternal lineages bind\nagainst others similarly binding\n\ndeserts in other primates are often associated with more intense male-male between group fighting, e.g.\nhamadryas vs regular baboons—that we were doing more than riding the camels in the dessert is suggested by\nthe fact that a lactose-tolerant gene arose in that area related to the lactose of camels, so we were apparently\nmilking our camels !\n\ni believe you have heard of the Enhanced Learning Foundation; it got me to where i am today on this\nsubject, and perhaps it may wish to go further\n\ni intend to do a year of intense work and then summarise. i was never mentally as fast as you and i am certainly\nnot getting faster with age (76 this February) but i do have a good eye for fundamental logic and i believe this\nwill be the last serious project in my life--i will not let go until i have wrapped this whole thing up, especially\n\nwith the help of Amy, who is now putting together a master Excel file on all this\n\ni plan a book on all of this of course, it will be co-authored by Dr Jacobson"}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026440.txt_24032	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026440.txt	Re: Subject to change	[{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 6:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Subject to change", "body": "So the publisher wants me to trim down 700 to 400 pages in \"The Best of...\" collection. Tsk tsk. Below will be the revised mini-essay to serve as the final piece. Although I detest Trump, to be fair, I realized, thanks to you, that I had no evidence that he had raped a 13-year-old, though I did have have evidence that, as an adult, there was evidence that she made an accusation. Also, I added another sentence with a positive ending. Meanwhile, Happy Earth Day.\n\nThe Last Word: Yikes!\nWhen George W. Bush was elected president in the year 2000, it was due to the electoral college (a rigged system which originally intended to prevent slaves from voting and evolved to gerrymandering), even though Bush's opponent, Al Gore, won the national popular vote. Hillary Clinton was elected senator that year, and she announced that the first thing she would do was to get rid of the electoral college. A few years later, as a columnist for the New York Press, I sent her a letter asking about the status of that promise. She didn't reply.\nOn November 8, 2016, a crooked businessman, liar extraordinaire, bragging pussy-grabber, make-America-white-again, anti-choice, anti-Semite, fake Christian, accused rapist of a 13-year-old in 1994 (she canceled a press conference one week before the election because of death threats if she filed a lawsuit), climate-change hoaxer, twitter addict, homophobic, apprentice politician, fucking fascist, and Vladimir Putin's \"useful idiot,\" namely Donald Trump, who was elected as an insanely narcissistic dictator based on the electoral college, whereas his opponent, Hillary Clinton, won the national popular vote by almost three million individuals galore, to no avail.\nIrony lives. But the monster has inadvertently awakened a population to resist."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["paul krassner"], "timestamp": "4/23/2017 11:20:28 AM", "subject": "Re: Subject to change", "body": "you can read the guardian article on the alleged 13 year old. put up to it by a pr guy, former jerry springer sales pitch man"}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030222.txt_24033	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030222.txt	FW: Daily Mail	[{"sender": "Ross Gow", "recipients": ["GMAX"], "timestamp": "Thu, 10 Mar 2011 21:29:24 +0000", "subject": "Re: Daily Mail", "body": "Maz is the most devious and cunning of the bunch. However, Editors can pay for people, stories and documents. They can even pay criminals if it is in the public interest. Maz can pay who he wants for info but the Yorkshire Ripper for instance, as a convicted criminal, can't sell his story...unless in public interest cos there was say, a bent detective. Fax: Below is from PCC Code for Editors. It is not well drafted."}, {"sender": "Kevin Maxwell", "recipients": ["NY Max"], "timestamp": "Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:40:11 -0500", "subject": "Fw: Daily Mail", "body": "Please see below. My take:A) voluntary rules are meaningless in terms of arranging for a cessation of crap articles/stories etcB) doesn't offer redress (financial or in terms of publicity.Law here definitely provides more protection and redress if individual(s) involved in approaches from newspapers are employees or have any form of contractual relationship with target.Let's talk.Kevin"}, {"sender": "GMAX", "recipients": ["J Jep <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 11 2011 12:54 AM", "subject": "FW: Daily Mail", "body": ""}]	3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033593.txt_24034	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033593.txt	B 727 thought	[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "1/12/2012 3:12:10 PM", "subject": "B 727 thought", "body": "Jeffrey, \nthis may be a long shot to save the Boeing deal, or if you think its a dead deal, disregard this. \nI thought there was a connection between Tarek and myself, I do believe one concern was operation of Boeing with \nflight crew. I know its his problem not ours, but may help make the sale happen,. \nI wrote this email for your review, if you think its worth sending, please critique, and let me know,. thank you: \nMr. Tarek El Sayed, \nI hope this email finds you well, and believe worth communicating my thoughts to you. \nI was surprised to hear that you decided against the purchase of our Super Boeing 727. I personally thought it was a great match for \nyour business needs in Qatar. If for any reason your decision was based on crew issues and charter needs in the Middle East, I'd like \nto share some information that might prove beneficial to making you reconsider this purchase. \nThe pilot candidates I have lined up for your interview along with the possibility of David Rodgers joining your flight department \nwere as follows: \n(at no time did I disclose location or persons to the following pilot candidates to protect your privacy.) \nRobert Breslin, who is the former Chief Pilot of Mr. Donald Trump, Mr. Breslin flew the Boeing 727 and Boeing 757 owned by Mr \nTrump. Mr Breslin is a fine man of 40 years of age estimate, with extensive VIP Boeing operations. \nJames Bartakowski, who has extensive flying experience in the Middle east, Africa and Europe regime. Mr. Bartakowski has also \nbeen involved in charter operations in Africa and Middle East and has contacted me on several recent occasions with charters for \nour Boeing 727, James has indicated there is the possibility of 40 — 60 hours per month charter operations for larger transport \ncategory aircraft in your area. I believe there is a growing need for charter in the business community in Qatar and neighboring \ncountries. \nBruce Jafahri, who is a current Boeing 727 captain who lived in Doha for two years, and familiar with international operations of \nBoeing 727 aircraft. Mr. Jafahri currently lives in California and ready for a new opportunity. Bruce is current in the Boeing 727 and \nalso flew Captain on the Boeing 747. Well qualified individual and personable. \nMr. El Sayed, as you have seen during our demo flight, our Boeing 727 is in impeccable condition, quite cabin and will provide many \nyears of charter and business flights your company. I believe the large business jet future in Qatar is growing and you will be leading \nits path, and your initial investment in this purchase will not come close with other aircraft options on the market as you may have \nseen already. \nWe are currently completing the C2C check on the Boeing, and as we have done in the past, assure you it will be a fine aircraft \nwhen it leaves Flight Star Maintenance repair facility. \nSincerely, \nLawrance Visoski \nChief Pilot, JEGE Inc."}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032855.txt_24035	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032855.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Tom Barrack Private"], "timestamp": "Mar 9, 2016, at 6:26 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "hope you are well. photos look good. fyi I receive many calls a week about both Donald (, beauty contest. mara lago etc) and clinton from reporters. less so recently with clinton , but my answers are always i have nothing to say. or i try to ignore altogether. A few times i have been ambushed on the street with questions . but am more careful now"}, {"sender": "Tom Barrack Private", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:28 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Hope ur good. Let's catch up"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Tom Barrack Private"], "timestamp": "3/9/2016 5:32:21 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "send photos of you and child. -- make me smile"}]	3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032699.txt_24040	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032699.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 1:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 1:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Internet is crashing right now about this....trump apparently off his rocker"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 1:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "told you"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 2:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Does he have a lawyer? Is he dealing with mueller?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 2:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "it also includes barrack, saying not is only donald crazy but hes stupid. SO MCH FUN"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 7:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "As usual you nailed it....tomorrow will be an interesting day"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 8:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "1/4/2018 1:49:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just reading this...will call this morn..."}]	8
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033587.txt_24041	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033587.txt	Fwd: media inquiry - Fox News	[{"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "4/27/2016 7:49:46 PM", "subject": "Fwd: media inquiry - Fox News", "body": "Sent from my iPhone\nBegin forwarded message:"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Mr. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "April 27, 2016 at 3:47:49 PM EDT", "subject": "media inquiry - Fox News", "body": "I was referred to you by Alan Dershowitz, who told me you're Jeffrey Epstein's attorney.\nIf this is the case, I was hoping to reach him through you to see if he'd be willing to speak on the record about\nhis ties - or previous ties - to both the Clintons and Donald Trump?\nWould you be able to arrange a call or email exchange this week?\nThanks for your consideration.\nInvestigative Reporter,\nFoxNews.com\n2044 Armacost Avenue\nLos Angeles, CA 90025"}]	2
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031286.txt_24052	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031286.txt	Fwd: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE	[{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "8/18/2016 2:45:08 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE", "body": "JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!\nAttachments: 2016.08.17 - Draft Letter to Eric Rayman re Epstein Book re Steven Hoffe....docx; Untitled attachment 110342.htm\n\nImportance: — High"}, {"sender": "Michael, Charles", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "August 17, 2016 at 10:56:37 PM EDT", "subject": "RE: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": ""}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022801.txt_24076	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022801.txt	Help!	[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 6:39 PM", "subject": "Help!", "body": "Because you were not available to meet me in person last year and at this point I don't need to be seen. I can not have press, \nmedia, private investigators, film companies, etc. contacting me or my parents and sisters at home or on cell/texts and or by \nmail. I realize you don't have much control over this, but you can at least help me to move. I can't just get up and go like you. \nI left the city to escape, make a better life and I am devastated these people found me and brought to light an association of that \nI would rather them never to know. People think I was involved with something really bad and I lost a boyfriend of great \npotential over this shit. I am still in debt over all these years, been working my ass off trying to get ahead, which you could \nnever understand I was even surviving off the pay I was getting. Well, its not any better. I dropped out of college because of \n1 \nyou (and GM's) advice. Started working for a company you wanted me to and basically my life has has become hell since then. \nI have been your supporter for 16 years, the media explosion with Clinton, Trump and Cosby is affecting me. I'm not prepared \nfor this."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 19, 2016", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "i appreciate it. I should be back feb 14,"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "Appreciate what? I'm not sure you do. Be back for what? Where? I don't need to be photographed. I am \ntrying to avoid that, hence the reason why I moved out here. I don't need people coming here looking for me \nto give them information about you or the \"people\" I was documented with... It's not my property. I don't \nthink you get it."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 20, 2016", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "i appreciate your support is what i meant. has anyting happened recently? it is my birthday today"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:19 PM", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "Happy birthday, I remember the few I had spent with you, good memories! \nThe problem is that you may appreciate my support but that doesn't help me. Yes, I told you I can't have \npeople coming here to ask about you and ex pals.... My landlord may shoot them. He is pissed. I need your \nhelp. Out of all the people you should be helping is someone who actually genuinely cared about you.i realize \nyou're living the good life and I'm not your concern, but if you really appreciated my support then you'd help \nme otherwise I don't know what I'll do."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "On Wednesday, January 20, 2016", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "what do you suggest?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Monday, February 15, 2016 3:25 PM", "subject": "Help!", "body": "Still have Zorro V pjs... Perfect for my lonely Valentine's Day. © \nSo, what do you think about my suggestion to help? \nHow are you holding up?"}]	7