Spaces:
Runtime error
Runtime error
| # User Requirements for GAIA Framework Improvement | |
| Based on the provided `pasted_content.txt`, the user's requirements for improving the GAIA multi-agent framework are as follows: | |
| ## Overall Goal | |
| Improve the existing multi-agent framework to maximize performance on the GAIA benchmark. | |
| ## Specific Objectives | |
| 1. **Code Quality Review:** | |
| * Analyze all source files (`.py`, config, tests, docs if present). | |
| * Identify weaknesses such as: | |
| * Design smells | |
| * Performance issues | |
| * Missing type hints | |
| * Brittle parsing logic | |
| * Insufficient test coverage | |
| * Other reliability impairments. | |
| 2. **Refactor Proposals:** | |
| * For each identified weakness, suggest concise improvements. | |
| * Provide practical improvements as diff-style patches where feasible. | |
| 3. **New Feature Implementation:** | |
| * **YouTube Ingestion:** | |
| * Input: YouTube video URL. | |
| * Process: Download audio -> Chunk audio (≤ 60 seconds) -> Transcribe chunks using Gemini 1.5 Pro. | |
| * Output: Full transcript and a one-paragraph summary. | |
| * **Generic Audio Transcription:** | |
| * Input: Local audio file path or remote audio URL. | |
| * Process: Transcribe using Gemini 1.5 Pro (preferred for latency tolerance) or Whisper-cpp (fallback). | |
| * Output: Expose functionality via a simple Python API. | |
| 4. **Extra Agent Design:** | |
| * Design at least three new specialized agents. | |
| * These agents should demonstrably contribute to boosting GAIA benchmark performance. | |
| * For each new agent, provide: | |
| * Purpose | |
| * Key tool calls | |
| * Sketch of the agent loop/logic. | |
| 5. **Migration Plan:** | |
| * Define the recommended order for applying the proposed refactor patches and implementing new features. | |
| * List all new dependencies required for `requirements.txt`. | |
| * Outline the minimal unit and/or integration tests needed to validate each new feature or significant change. | |
| ## Output Format Requirements | |
| * Start the final report with a short ASCII diagram representing the *revised* system architecture (incorporating proposed changes). | |
| * For each modified source file or new module: | |
| * Provide a one-sentence rationale for the change. | |
| * Include any required unified diff patches enclosed in triple backticks with the filename in the header. | |
| * Group related changes together. | |
| * Use plain paragraphs rather than long bullet lists where appropriate. | |
| * Maintain concise prose. | |
| * Ask brief clarifying questions if uncertainties arise during the process. | |
| ## Process Constraint | |
| * Wait for user confirmation before starting the review. | |
| * The initial phase involves analysis and presenting the improvement plan (including architecture diagram, code review findings, refactor proposals, new feature designs, extra agent designs, and migration plan). | |
| * Stop after presenting this initial plan and await further instructions or confirmation. | |