Experimental global target bits‑per‑weight quantization of Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B and Qwen/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B.
Unlike standard llama.cpp quantizations that rely on fixed type heuristics (e.g., Q4_K_M), the Target BPW approach optimizes per-tensor precision where it matters the most, and produces high quality models that meet a precise global file size target.
Key Advantages: - VRAM Maximization: Can generate high quality models sized exactly to fit hardware constraints (e.g., fitting the model into exactly 24GB VRAM). - Data-Driven Precision: Quantization mix is determined by actual weight error sensitivity rather than hardcoded rules, often yielding better PPL/KLD size trade-offs.
Full benchmarks (PPL, KLD, ARC, GPQA, MMLU, etc.) and methodology in the models' cards.
🏆 Nacrith: a 135M model that out-compresses everything on natural language
What if a tiny LM could compress english text better than _every_ compressor out there — classical or neural, small or large?
Nacrith pairs SmolLM2-135M with an ensemble of online predictors and high-precision arithmetic coding.
What's inside
The standard LLM+arithmetic coding approach wastes ~75% of CDF precision on large vocabularies. Our CDF-24 fix alone recovers 0.5 bpb. On top: a token N-gram that skips the GPU on predictable tokens, an adaptive bias head, llama.cpp backend (7× faster than PyTorch), multi-GPU parallel compression, and a binary file format (NC06) — the first LLM-based binary compressor we know of.
Runs on a GTX 1050 Ti. ~500 MB weights, ~1.2 GB VRAM per worker.
Try it, break it, share your results — all feedback welcome. ⭐ on the repo appreciated!
Results across all systems we tested: - alice29.txt → 0.918 bpb (−44% vs CMIX, −20% vs ts_zip) — below the 2nd-order Shannon entropy bound - enwik8 (100 MB) → 0.9389 bpb (−8% vs FineZip/LLMZip's 8B model, −15% vs ts_zip) - Unseen text → 0.723 bpb on a doc published after training cutoff — no memorization, 26% better than FineZip/LLMZip on the same model