Datasets:
question_id
int64 337
65.5k
| question
stringlengths 11
209
| answer
stringlengths 1
145
| document_text
stringlengths 30
7.9k
| page
int64 1
1
| other_metadata
dict | num_tokens
int64 26
1.76k
| match_type
stringclasses 3
values | messages
listlengths 2
2
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
337
|
what is the date mentioned in this letter?
|
1/8/93
|
Page 1
Confidential
.. ..
RJRT PR APPROVAL
DATE :
1/8/13
Ru alAs
PROPOSED RELEASE DATE:
for response
FOR RELEASE TO:
CONTACT:
P. CARTER
ROUTE TO
Initials
pate
Peggy Carter
Ac
Maura Payne
David Fishel
Tom GRISCom
Diane Barrows
Ed Blackmer
Tow Rucker
TR
Return to Peggy Carter, PR, 16 Reynolds Building
51142 3977
. .
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xnb10037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 279,
"image": "xnbl0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "xnbl0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 148
|
none
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nConfidential\n.. ..\nRJRT PR APPROVAL\nDATE :\n1/8/13\nRu alAs\nPROPOSED RELEASE DATE:\nfor response\nFOR RELEASE TO:\nCONTACT:\nP. CARTER\nROUTE TO\nInitials\npate\nPeggy Carter\nAc\nMaura Payne\nDavid Fishel\nTom GRISCom\nDiane Barrows\nEd Blackmer\nTow Rucker\nTR\nReturn to Peggy Carter, PR, 16 Reynolds Building\n51142 3977\n. .\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xnb10037\n\nQuestion: what is the date mentioned in this letter?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1/8/93",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
338
|
what is the contact person name mentioned in letter?
|
P. Carter
|
Page 1
Confidential
.. ..
RJRT PR APPROVAL
DATE :
1/8/13
Ru alAs
PROPOSED RELEASE DATE:
for response
FOR RELEASE TO:
CONTACT:
P. CARTER
ROUTE TO
Initials
pate
Peggy Carter
Ac
Maura Payne
David Fishel
Tom GRISCom
Diane Barrows
Ed Blackmer
Tow Rucker
TR
Return to Peggy Carter, PR, 16 Reynolds Building
51142 3977
. .
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xnb10037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 279,
"image": "xnbl0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "xnbl0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 147
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nConfidential\n.. ..\nRJRT PR APPROVAL\nDATE :\n1/8/13\nRu alAs\nPROPOSED RELEASE DATE:\nfor response\nFOR RELEASE TO:\nCONTACT:\nP. CARTER\nROUTE TO\nInitials\npate\nPeggy Carter\nAc\nMaura Payne\nDavid Fishel\nTom GRISCom\nDiane Barrows\nEd Blackmer\nTow Rucker\nTR\nReturn to Peggy Carter, PR, 16 Reynolds Building\n51142 3977\n. .\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xnb10037\n\nQuestion: what is the contact person name mentioned in letter?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "P. Carter",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
339
|
Which corporation's letterhead is this?
|
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation
|
Page 1
B&W
BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
. . . .
INTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO:
R. H. Honeycutt
CC:
T.F. Riehl
FROM:
C. J. Cook
DATE:
May 8. 1995
SUBJECT: Review of Existing Brainstorming Ideas/483
The major function of the Product Innovation Group is to develop marketable novel products
that would be profitable to manufacture and sell. Novel is defined as: of a new kind, or different
from anything seen or known before. Innovation is defined as: something new or different
introduced; act of innovating; introduction of new things or methods. The products may
ncorporate the latest technologies, materials and know-how available to give then a unique
taste or look.
The first task of the Product Innovation Group was to assemble, review and categorize a list of
existing brainstorming ideas. Ideas were grouped into two major categories labeled
appearance and taste/aroma. These categories are used for novel products that may differ
from a visual and/or taste/aroma point of view compared to conventional cigarettes. Other
categories include a combination of the above, filters, packaging and brand extensions.
Appearance
This category is used for novel cigarette constructions that yield visually different products with
minimal changes in smoke chemistry
Two cigarettes in one
.Multi-plug to build your own cigarette.
.Switchable menthol or non menthol cigarette.
future smoking.
Cigarettes with interspaced perforations to enable smoker to separate unburned section for
.Short cigarette, tobacco section 30 mm.
. Extremely fast buming cigarette.
-. ..". " .
. Novel cigarette constructions that permit a significant reduction in tobacco weight while
maintaining smoking mechanics and visual characteristics.
. . .
. Higher basis weight paper; potential reduction in tobacco weight.
. More rigid tobacco column; stiffing agent for tobacco; e.g. starch
. Colored tow and cigarette papers; seasonal promotions, e.g. pastel colored cigarettes for
Easter or in an Ebony and Ivory brand containing a mixture of all black (black paper and tow)
and all white cigarettes.
499150498
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxcj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 280,
"image": "mxcj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mxcj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 496
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nB&W\nBROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION\nRESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT\n. . . .\nINTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE\nTO:\nR. H. Honeycutt\nCC:\nT.F. Riehl\nFROM:\nC. J. Cook\nDATE:\nMay 8. 1995\nSUBJECT: Review of Existing Brainstorming Ideas/483\nThe major function of the Product Innovation Group is to develop marketable novel products\nthat would be profitable to manufacture and sell. Novel is defined as: of a new kind, or different\nfrom anything seen or known before. Innovation is defined as: something new or different\nintroduced; act of innovating; introduction of new things or methods. The products may\nncorporate the latest technologies, materials and know-how available to give then a unique\ntaste or look.\nThe first task of the Product Innovation Group was to assemble, review and categorize a list of\nexisting brainstorming ideas. Ideas were grouped into two major categories labeled\nappearance and taste/aroma. These categories are used for novel products that may differ\nfrom a visual and/or taste/aroma point of view compared to conventional cigarettes. Other\ncategories include a combination of the above, filters, packaging and brand extensions.\nAppearance\nThis category is used for novel cigarette constructions that yield visually different products with\nminimal changes in smoke chemistry\nTwo cigarettes in one\n.Multi-plug to build your own cigarette.\n.Switchable menthol or non menthol cigarette.\nfuture smoking.\nCigarettes with interspaced perforations to enable smoker to separate unburned section for\n.Short cigarette, tobacco section 30 mm.\n. Extremely fast buming cigarette.\n-. ..\". \" .\n. Novel cigarette constructions that permit a significant reduction in tobacco weight while\nmaintaining smoking mechanics and visual characteristics.\n. . .\n. Higher basis weight paper; potential reduction in tobacco weight.\n. More rigid tobacco column; stiffing agent for tobacco; e.g. starch\n. Colored tow and cigarette papers; seasonal promotions, e.g. pastel colored cigarettes for\nEaster or in an Ebony and Ivory brand containing a mixture of all black (black paper and tow)\nand all white cigarettes.\n499150498\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxcj0037\n\nQuestion: Which corporation's letterhead is this?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
340
|
Who is in cc in this letter?
|
T.F. Riehl
|
Page 1
B&W
BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
. . . .
INTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO:
R. H. Honeycutt
CC:
T.F. Riehl
FROM:
C. J. Cook
DATE:
May 8. 1995
SUBJECT: Review of Existing Brainstorming Ideas/483
The major function of the Product Innovation Group is to develop marketable novel products
that would be profitable to manufacture and sell. Novel is defined as: of a new kind, or different
from anything seen or known before. Innovation is defined as: something new or different
introduced; act of innovating; introduction of new things or methods. The products may
ncorporate the latest technologies, materials and know-how available to give then a unique
taste or look.
The first task of the Product Innovation Group was to assemble, review and categorize a list of
existing brainstorming ideas. Ideas were grouped into two major categories labeled
appearance and taste/aroma. These categories are used for novel products that may differ
from a visual and/or taste/aroma point of view compared to conventional cigarettes. Other
categories include a combination of the above, filters, packaging and brand extensions.
Appearance
This category is used for novel cigarette constructions that yield visually different products with
minimal changes in smoke chemistry
Two cigarettes in one
.Multi-plug to build your own cigarette.
.Switchable menthol or non menthol cigarette.
future smoking.
Cigarettes with interspaced perforations to enable smoker to separate unburned section for
.Short cigarette, tobacco section 30 mm.
. Extremely fast buming cigarette.
-. ..". " .
. Novel cigarette constructions that permit a significant reduction in tobacco weight while
maintaining smoking mechanics and visual characteristics.
. . .
. Higher basis weight paper; potential reduction in tobacco weight.
. More rigid tobacco column; stiffing agent for tobacco; e.g. starch
. Colored tow and cigarette papers; seasonal promotions, e.g. pastel colored cigarettes for
Easter or in an Ebony and Ivory brand containing a mixture of all black (black paper and tow)
and all white cigarettes.
499150498
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxcj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 280,
"image": "mxcj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mxcj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 498
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nB&W\nBROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION\nRESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT\n. . . .\nINTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE\nTO:\nR. H. Honeycutt\nCC:\nT.F. Riehl\nFROM:\nC. J. Cook\nDATE:\nMay 8. 1995\nSUBJECT: Review of Existing Brainstorming Ideas/483\nThe major function of the Product Innovation Group is to develop marketable novel products\nthat would be profitable to manufacture and sell. Novel is defined as: of a new kind, or different\nfrom anything seen or known before. Innovation is defined as: something new or different\nintroduced; act of innovating; introduction of new things or methods. The products may\nncorporate the latest technologies, materials and know-how available to give then a unique\ntaste or look.\nThe first task of the Product Innovation Group was to assemble, review and categorize a list of\nexisting brainstorming ideas. Ideas were grouped into two major categories labeled\nappearance and taste/aroma. These categories are used for novel products that may differ\nfrom a visual and/or taste/aroma point of view compared to conventional cigarettes. Other\ncategories include a combination of the above, filters, packaging and brand extensions.\nAppearance\nThis category is used for novel cigarette constructions that yield visually different products with\nminimal changes in smoke chemistry\nTwo cigarettes in one\n.Multi-plug to build your own cigarette.\n.Switchable menthol or non menthol cigarette.\nfuture smoking.\nCigarettes with interspaced perforations to enable smoker to separate unburned section for\n.Short cigarette, tobacco section 30 mm.\n. Extremely fast buming cigarette.\n-. ..\". \" .\n. Novel cigarette constructions that permit a significant reduction in tobacco weight while\nmaintaining smoking mechanics and visual characteristics.\n. . .\n. Higher basis weight paper; potential reduction in tobacco weight.\n. More rigid tobacco column; stiffing agent for tobacco; e.g. starch\n. Colored tow and cigarette papers; seasonal promotions, e.g. pastel colored cigarettes for\nEaster or in an Ebony and Ivory brand containing a mixture of all black (black paper and tow)\nand all white cigarettes.\n499150498\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxcj0037\n\nQuestion: Who is in cc in this letter?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "T.F. Riehl",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
341
|
what is the subject of this letter?
|
Review of existing Brainstorming Ideas/483
|
Page 1
B&W
BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
. . . .
INTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO:
R. H. Honeycutt
CC:
T.F. Riehl
FROM:
C. J. Cook
DATE:
May 8. 1995
SUBJECT: Review of Existing Brainstorming Ideas/483
The major function of the Product Innovation Group is to develop marketable novel products
that would be profitable to manufacture and sell. Novel is defined as: of a new kind, or different
from anything seen or known before. Innovation is defined as: something new or different
introduced; act of innovating; introduction of new things or methods. The products may
ncorporate the latest technologies, materials and know-how available to give then a unique
taste or look.
The first task of the Product Innovation Group was to assemble, review and categorize a list of
existing brainstorming ideas. Ideas were grouped into two major categories labeled
appearance and taste/aroma. These categories are used for novel products that may differ
from a visual and/or taste/aroma point of view compared to conventional cigarettes. Other
categories include a combination of the above, filters, packaging and brand extensions.
Appearance
This category is used for novel cigarette constructions that yield visually different products with
minimal changes in smoke chemistry
Two cigarettes in one
.Multi-plug to build your own cigarette.
.Switchable menthol or non menthol cigarette.
future smoking.
Cigarettes with interspaced perforations to enable smoker to separate unburned section for
.Short cigarette, tobacco section 30 mm.
. Extremely fast buming cigarette.
-. ..". " .
. Novel cigarette constructions that permit a significant reduction in tobacco weight while
maintaining smoking mechanics and visual characteristics.
. . .
. Higher basis weight paper; potential reduction in tobacco weight.
. More rigid tobacco column; stiffing agent for tobacco; e.g. starch
. Colored tow and cigarette papers; seasonal promotions, e.g. pastel colored cigarettes for
Easter or in an Ebony and Ivory brand containing a mixture of all black (black paper and tow)
and all white cigarettes.
499150498
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxcj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 280,
"image": "mxcj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mxcj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 501
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nB&W\nBROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION\nRESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT\n. . . .\nINTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE\nTO:\nR. H. Honeycutt\nCC:\nT.F. Riehl\nFROM:\nC. J. Cook\nDATE:\nMay 8. 1995\nSUBJECT: Review of Existing Brainstorming Ideas/483\nThe major function of the Product Innovation Group is to develop marketable novel products\nthat would be profitable to manufacture and sell. Novel is defined as: of a new kind, or different\nfrom anything seen or known before. Innovation is defined as: something new or different\nintroduced; act of innovating; introduction of new things or methods. The products may\nncorporate the latest technologies, materials and know-how available to give then a unique\ntaste or look.\nThe first task of the Product Innovation Group was to assemble, review and categorize a list of\nexisting brainstorming ideas. Ideas were grouped into two major categories labeled\nappearance and taste/aroma. These categories are used for novel products that may differ\nfrom a visual and/or taste/aroma point of view compared to conventional cigarettes. Other\ncategories include a combination of the above, filters, packaging and brand extensions.\nAppearance\nThis category is used for novel cigarette constructions that yield visually different products with\nminimal changes in smoke chemistry\nTwo cigarettes in one\n.Multi-plug to build your own cigarette.\n.Switchable menthol or non menthol cigarette.\nfuture smoking.\nCigarettes with interspaced perforations to enable smoker to separate unburned section for\n.Short cigarette, tobacco section 30 mm.\n. Extremely fast buming cigarette.\n-. ..\". \" .\n. Novel cigarette constructions that permit a significant reduction in tobacco weight while\nmaintaining smoking mechanics and visual characteristics.\n. . .\n. Higher basis weight paper; potential reduction in tobacco weight.\n. More rigid tobacco column; stiffing agent for tobacco; e.g. starch\n. Colored tow and cigarette papers; seasonal promotions, e.g. pastel colored cigarettes for\nEaster or in an Ebony and Ivory brand containing a mixture of all black (black paper and tow)\nand all white cigarettes.\n499150498\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxcj0037\n\nQuestion: what is the subject of this letter?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Review of existing Brainstorming Ideas/483",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
343
|
What is the number at the bottom of the page, in bold?
|
499150498
|
Page 1
B&W
BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
. . . .
INTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO:
R. H. Honeycutt
CC:
T.F. Riehl
FROM:
C. J. Cook
DATE:
May 8. 1995
SUBJECT: Review of Existing Brainstorming Ideas/483
The major function of the Product Innovation Group is to develop marketable novel products
that would be profitable to manufacture and sell. Novel is defined as: of a new kind, or different
from anything seen or known before. Innovation is defined as: something new or different
introduced; act of innovating; introduction of new things or methods. The products may
ncorporate the latest technologies, materials and know-how available to give then a unique
taste or look.
The first task of the Product Innovation Group was to assemble, review and categorize a list of
existing brainstorming ideas. Ideas were grouped into two major categories labeled
appearance and taste/aroma. These categories are used for novel products that may differ
from a visual and/or taste/aroma point of view compared to conventional cigarettes. Other
categories include a combination of the above, filters, packaging and brand extensions.
Appearance
This category is used for novel cigarette constructions that yield visually different products with
minimal changes in smoke chemistry
Two cigarettes in one
.Multi-plug to build your own cigarette.
.Switchable menthol or non menthol cigarette.
future smoking.
Cigarettes with interspaced perforations to enable smoker to separate unburned section for
.Short cigarette, tobacco section 30 mm.
. Extremely fast buming cigarette.
-. ..". " .
. Novel cigarette constructions that permit a significant reduction in tobacco weight while
maintaining smoking mechanics and visual characteristics.
. . .
. Higher basis weight paper; potential reduction in tobacco weight.
. More rigid tobacco column; stiffing agent for tobacco; e.g. starch
. Colored tow and cigarette papers; seasonal promotions, e.g. pastel colored cigarettes for
Easter or in an Ebony and Ivory brand containing a mixture of all black (black paper and tow)
and all white cigarettes.
499150498
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxcj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 280,
"image": "mxcj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mxcj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 500
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nB&W\nBROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION\nRESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT\n. . . .\nINTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE\nTO:\nR. H. Honeycutt\nCC:\nT.F. Riehl\nFROM:\nC. J. Cook\nDATE:\nMay 8. 1995\nSUBJECT: Review of Existing Brainstorming Ideas/483\nThe major function of the Product Innovation Group is to develop marketable novel products\nthat would be profitable to manufacture and sell. Novel is defined as: of a new kind, or different\nfrom anything seen or known before. Innovation is defined as: something new or different\nintroduced; act of innovating; introduction of new things or methods. The products may\nncorporate the latest technologies, materials and know-how available to give then a unique\ntaste or look.\nThe first task of the Product Innovation Group was to assemble, review and categorize a list of\nexisting brainstorming ideas. Ideas were grouped into two major categories labeled\nappearance and taste/aroma. These categories are used for novel products that may differ\nfrom a visual and/or taste/aroma point of view compared to conventional cigarettes. Other\ncategories include a combination of the above, filters, packaging and brand extensions.\nAppearance\nThis category is used for novel cigarette constructions that yield visually different products with\nminimal changes in smoke chemistry\nTwo cigarettes in one\n.Multi-plug to build your own cigarette.\n.Switchable menthol or non menthol cigarette.\nfuture smoking.\nCigarettes with interspaced perforations to enable smoker to separate unburned section for\n.Short cigarette, tobacco section 30 mm.\n. Extremely fast buming cigarette.\n-. ..\". \" .\n. Novel cigarette constructions that permit a significant reduction in tobacco weight while\nmaintaining smoking mechanics and visual characteristics.\n. . .\n. Higher basis weight paper; potential reduction in tobacco weight.\n. More rigid tobacco column; stiffing agent for tobacco; e.g. starch\n. Colored tow and cigarette papers; seasonal promotions, e.g. pastel colored cigarettes for\nEaster or in an Ebony and Ivory brand containing a mixture of all black (black paper and tow)\nand all white cigarettes.\n499150498\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxcj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the number at the bottom of the page, in bold?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "499150498",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
388
|
How many points are there in modifications to readout instrumentation
|
5.
|
Page 2
2.
The rotometer in the original design was replaced by a 0-100 SILPM mass flow
meter (Hastings #200B) to provide more precise flow settings. As in the original
design, flow is set before each smoke run by manual adjustment of a 3/4" needle
valve (Whitey SS65XTF12-F16) and the flowmeter is bypassed during smoke
measurements to minimize contamination. In the new design the mass flowmeter
is bypassed during smoke runs by the parallel combination of a 3/4" needle valve
(Whitey SS65XTF12-F16) and a length of unrestricted 1/2" piping. The latter
valve is adjusted to give an identical pressure drop (as indicated by a 0-25 cm
H, O Dwyer Magnehelico gauge) to that of the mass flowmeter, thus maintaining
the flow when the meter is removed from the circuit.
Modifications to Readout Instrumentation:
The single turn sensitivity potentiometer supplied on the Oriel #7072 amplifier
was replaced with a ten turn potentiometer to allow more precise settings of the
zero attenuateon level.
2:
To reduce noise and drift in the computer data acquisition system, the output
voltage divider internal to the Oriel amplifier was altered to increase the
instrument's output by a factor of 100. The sensitivities of the computer data
system and the parallel strip chart recorder were correspondingly reduced
3.
Signal leads were re-dressed and shielded to minimize ground loops and RF
pickup. The exposed terminal board was eliminated.
4.
A running display of output voltage was added to the computer screen as a visual
aid to the operator.
5.
Changes to the computer program were made by Randy Greene to eliminate
minor operational problems. The changes did not affect the calculation of any
reported parameters.
CC:
P: N. Gauvin
B. L. Goodman
A. C. Lilly
D. D. McRae
E. B. Sanders
J. E. Wickham
Central Files
-2-
2022156306
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/sxxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 297,
"image": "sxxj0037_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "sxxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 488
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\n2.\nThe rotometer in the original design was replaced by a 0-100 SILPM mass flow\nmeter (Hastings #200B) to provide more precise flow settings. As in the original\ndesign, flow is set before each smoke run by manual adjustment of a 3/4\" needle\nvalve (Whitey SS65XTF12-F16) and the flowmeter is bypassed during smoke\nmeasurements to minimize contamination. In the new design the mass flowmeter\nis bypassed during smoke runs by the parallel combination of a 3/4\" needle valve\n(Whitey SS65XTF12-F16) and a length of unrestricted 1/2\" piping. The latter\nvalve is adjusted to give an identical pressure drop (as indicated by a 0-25 cm\nH, O Dwyer Magnehelico gauge) to that of the mass flowmeter, thus maintaining\nthe flow when the meter is removed from the circuit.\nModifications to Readout Instrumentation:\nThe single turn sensitivity potentiometer supplied on the Oriel #7072 amplifier\nwas replaced with a ten turn potentiometer to allow more precise settings of the\nzero attenuateon level.\n2:\nTo reduce noise and drift in the computer data acquisition system, the output\nvoltage divider internal to the Oriel amplifier was altered to increase the\ninstrument's output by a factor of 100. The sensitivities of the computer data\nsystem and the parallel strip chart recorder were correspondingly reduced\n3.\nSignal leads were re-dressed and shielded to minimize ground loops and RF\npickup. The exposed terminal board was eliminated.\n4.\nA running display of output voltage was added to the computer screen as a visual\naid to the operator.\n5.\nChanges to the computer program were made by Randy Greene to eliminate\nminor operational problems. The changes did not affect the calculation of any\nreported parameters.\nCC:\nP: N. Gauvin\nB. L. Goodman\nA. C. Lilly\nD. D. McRae\nE. B. Sanders\nJ. E. Wickham\nCentral Files\n-2-\n2022156306\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/sxxj0037\n\nQuestion: How many points are there in modifications to readout instrumentation",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "5.",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
399
|
what is the date in the letter
|
June 11, 1990
|
Page 1
PHILIP MORRIS U. S. A.
INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
Richmond, Virginia
To
Dr. K. S. Houghton
Date: June 11, 1990
From:
Ted Sanders
Subject:
Paper Technology Update for the Week of June 4
Reduced Sidestream
Trim
Short-term plans have been formulated to address customer complaints regarding
Virginia Slims Superslims. Models will be made which will evaluate lower tobacco density,
use of outer wraps coated with potassium phosphate and/or short chain dicarboxylic acids
(malonic and succinic), outer wraps containing mixed chalk (Albacar and Multifex), charcoal
filters, increased chalk content in the inner wrap, increased basis weight for the inner wrap, and
increased tar delivery (9 mg). A memo has been issued by Jeanette Hickle outlining the
schedule for making these models. A longer term approach directed at improving subjectives is
to design an outer wrap using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent but at a porosity
higher than has been investigated for full circumference cigarettes. Calculations have indicated
that the greater effectiveness of the Multifex calcium carbonate/mono potassium phosphate
system compared to the Multifex calcium carbonate/potassium succinate system can allow
outer wraps to be designed with Coresta porosities of up to 12 and still obtain greater than 70%
sidestream reduction for a 17 mm circumference cigarette.
A Superslims model with 50% of the Multifex chalk replaced by Albacar chalk in the
outer wrap was tested on the MC Panel versus a control Superslims. No significant differences
were seen in any of the attributes. The only analytical difference was the slower burn rate of
the 50:50 model. Although both of these models were essentially similar in every respect, they
were both out of spec with regard to delivery (7 mg tar). Consequently, these models will be
remade in Louisville to the correct tar delivery.
Lotus
The low sidestream panel evaluated full circumference cigarettes with the Superslims
double wrap system on Marlboro blend. One model used 100% Multifex chalk, while the other
model had a 50:50 Multifex/Albacar mixture as the inorganic filler. Although neither model
was judged to be subjectively acceptable, the panel could detect no differences between the
models.
2022155886
C90-03066
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 314,
"image": "nhxj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "nhxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 564
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS U. S. A.\nINTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\nTo\nDr. K. S. Houghton\nDate: June 11, 1990\nFrom:\nTed Sanders\nSubject:\nPaper Technology Update for the Week of June 4\nReduced Sidestream\nTrim\nShort-term plans have been formulated to address customer complaints regarding\nVirginia Slims Superslims. Models will be made which will evaluate lower tobacco density,\nuse of outer wraps coated with potassium phosphate and/or short chain dicarboxylic acids\n(malonic and succinic), outer wraps containing mixed chalk (Albacar and Multifex), charcoal\nfilters, increased chalk content in the inner wrap, increased basis weight for the inner wrap, and\nincreased tar delivery (9 mg). A memo has been issued by Jeanette Hickle outlining the\nschedule for making these models. A longer term approach directed at improving subjectives is\nto design an outer wrap using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent but at a porosity\nhigher than has been investigated for full circumference cigarettes. Calculations have indicated\nthat the greater effectiveness of the Multifex calcium carbonate/mono potassium phosphate\nsystem compared to the Multifex calcium carbonate/potassium succinate system can allow\nouter wraps to be designed with Coresta porosities of up to 12 and still obtain greater than 70%\nsidestream reduction for a 17 mm circumference cigarette.\nA Superslims model with 50% of the Multifex chalk replaced by Albacar chalk in the\nouter wrap was tested on the MC Panel versus a control Superslims. No significant differences\nwere seen in any of the attributes. The only analytical difference was the slower burn rate of\nthe 50:50 model. Although both of these models were essentially similar in every respect, they\nwere both out of spec with regard to delivery (7 mg tar). Consequently, these models will be\nremade in Louisville to the correct tar delivery.\nLotus\nThe low sidestream panel evaluated full circumference cigarettes with the Superslims\ndouble wrap system on Marlboro blend. One model used 100% Multifex chalk, while the other\nmodel had a 50:50 Multifex/Albacar mixture as the inorganic filler. Although neither model\nwas judged to be subjectively acceptable, the panel could detect no differences between the\nmodels.\n2022155886\nC90-03066\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037\n\nQuestion: what is the date in the letter",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "June 11, 1990",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
400
|
To whom this is addressed
|
Dr.K.S.Houghton
|
Page 1
PHILIP MORRIS U. S. A.
INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
Richmond, Virginia
To
Dr. K. S. Houghton
Date: June 11, 1990
From:
Ted Sanders
Subject:
Paper Technology Update for the Week of June 4
Reduced Sidestream
Trim
Short-term plans have been formulated to address customer complaints regarding
Virginia Slims Superslims. Models will be made which will evaluate lower tobacco density,
use of outer wraps coated with potassium phosphate and/or short chain dicarboxylic acids
(malonic and succinic), outer wraps containing mixed chalk (Albacar and Multifex), charcoal
filters, increased chalk content in the inner wrap, increased basis weight for the inner wrap, and
increased tar delivery (9 mg). A memo has been issued by Jeanette Hickle outlining the
schedule for making these models. A longer term approach directed at improving subjectives is
to design an outer wrap using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent but at a porosity
higher than has been investigated for full circumference cigarettes. Calculations have indicated
that the greater effectiveness of the Multifex calcium carbonate/mono potassium phosphate
system compared to the Multifex calcium carbonate/potassium succinate system can allow
outer wraps to be designed with Coresta porosities of up to 12 and still obtain greater than 70%
sidestream reduction for a 17 mm circumference cigarette.
A Superslims model with 50% of the Multifex chalk replaced by Albacar chalk in the
outer wrap was tested on the MC Panel versus a control Superslims. No significant differences
were seen in any of the attributes. The only analytical difference was the slower burn rate of
the 50:50 model. Although both of these models were essentially similar in every respect, they
were both out of spec with regard to delivery (7 mg tar). Consequently, these models will be
remade in Louisville to the correct tar delivery.
Lotus
The low sidestream panel evaluated full circumference cigarettes with the Superslims
double wrap system on Marlboro blend. One model used 100% Multifex chalk, while the other
model had a 50:50 Multifex/Albacar mixture as the inorganic filler. Although neither model
was judged to be subjectively acceptable, the panel could detect no differences between the
models.
2022155886
C90-03066
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 314,
"image": "nhxj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "nhxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 561
|
none
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS U. S. A.\nINTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\nTo\nDr. K. S. Houghton\nDate: June 11, 1990\nFrom:\nTed Sanders\nSubject:\nPaper Technology Update for the Week of June 4\nReduced Sidestream\nTrim\nShort-term plans have been formulated to address customer complaints regarding\nVirginia Slims Superslims. Models will be made which will evaluate lower tobacco density,\nuse of outer wraps coated with potassium phosphate and/or short chain dicarboxylic acids\n(malonic and succinic), outer wraps containing mixed chalk (Albacar and Multifex), charcoal\nfilters, increased chalk content in the inner wrap, increased basis weight for the inner wrap, and\nincreased tar delivery (9 mg). A memo has been issued by Jeanette Hickle outlining the\nschedule for making these models. A longer term approach directed at improving subjectives is\nto design an outer wrap using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent but at a porosity\nhigher than has been investigated for full circumference cigarettes. Calculations have indicated\nthat the greater effectiveness of the Multifex calcium carbonate/mono potassium phosphate\nsystem compared to the Multifex calcium carbonate/potassium succinate system can allow\nouter wraps to be designed with Coresta porosities of up to 12 and still obtain greater than 70%\nsidestream reduction for a 17 mm circumference cigarette.\nA Superslims model with 50% of the Multifex chalk replaced by Albacar chalk in the\nouter wrap was tested on the MC Panel versus a control Superslims. No significant differences\nwere seen in any of the attributes. The only analytical difference was the slower burn rate of\nthe 50:50 model. Although both of these models were essentially similar in every respect, they\nwere both out of spec with regard to delivery (7 mg tar). Consequently, these models will be\nremade in Louisville to the correct tar delivery.\nLotus\nThe low sidestream panel evaluated full circumference cigarettes with the Superslims\ndouble wrap system on Marlboro blend. One model used 100% Multifex chalk, while the other\nmodel had a 50:50 Multifex/Albacar mixture as the inorganic filler. Although neither model\nwas judged to be subjectively acceptable, the panel could detect no differences between the\nmodels.\n2022155886\nC90-03066\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037\n\nQuestion: To whom this is addressed",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Dr.K.S.Houghton",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
401
|
Who sent the letter?
|
Ted Sanders
|
Page 1
PHILIP MORRIS U. S. A.
INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
Richmond, Virginia
To
Dr. K. S. Houghton
Date: June 11, 1990
From:
Ted Sanders
Subject:
Paper Technology Update for the Week of June 4
Reduced Sidestream
Trim
Short-term plans have been formulated to address customer complaints regarding
Virginia Slims Superslims. Models will be made which will evaluate lower tobacco density,
use of outer wraps coated with potassium phosphate and/or short chain dicarboxylic acids
(malonic and succinic), outer wraps containing mixed chalk (Albacar and Multifex), charcoal
filters, increased chalk content in the inner wrap, increased basis weight for the inner wrap, and
increased tar delivery (9 mg). A memo has been issued by Jeanette Hickle outlining the
schedule for making these models. A longer term approach directed at improving subjectives is
to design an outer wrap using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent but at a porosity
higher than has been investigated for full circumference cigarettes. Calculations have indicated
that the greater effectiveness of the Multifex calcium carbonate/mono potassium phosphate
system compared to the Multifex calcium carbonate/potassium succinate system can allow
outer wraps to be designed with Coresta porosities of up to 12 and still obtain greater than 70%
sidestream reduction for a 17 mm circumference cigarette.
A Superslims model with 50% of the Multifex chalk replaced by Albacar chalk in the
outer wrap was tested on the MC Panel versus a control Superslims. No significant differences
were seen in any of the attributes. The only analytical difference was the slower burn rate of
the 50:50 model. Although both of these models were essentially similar in every respect, they
were both out of spec with regard to delivery (7 mg tar). Consequently, these models will be
remade in Louisville to the correct tar delivery.
Lotus
The low sidestream panel evaluated full circumference cigarettes with the Superslims
double wrap system on Marlboro blend. One model used 100% Multifex chalk, while the other
model had a 50:50 Multifex/Albacar mixture as the inorganic filler. Although neither model
was judged to be subjectively acceptable, the panel could detect no differences between the
models.
2022155886
C90-03066
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 314,
"image": "nhxj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "nhxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 557
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS U. S. A.\nINTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\nTo\nDr. K. S. Houghton\nDate: June 11, 1990\nFrom:\nTed Sanders\nSubject:\nPaper Technology Update for the Week of June 4\nReduced Sidestream\nTrim\nShort-term plans have been formulated to address customer complaints regarding\nVirginia Slims Superslims. Models will be made which will evaluate lower tobacco density,\nuse of outer wraps coated with potassium phosphate and/or short chain dicarboxylic acids\n(malonic and succinic), outer wraps containing mixed chalk (Albacar and Multifex), charcoal\nfilters, increased chalk content in the inner wrap, increased basis weight for the inner wrap, and\nincreased tar delivery (9 mg). A memo has been issued by Jeanette Hickle outlining the\nschedule for making these models. A longer term approach directed at improving subjectives is\nto design an outer wrap using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent but at a porosity\nhigher than has been investigated for full circumference cigarettes. Calculations have indicated\nthat the greater effectiveness of the Multifex calcium carbonate/mono potassium phosphate\nsystem compared to the Multifex calcium carbonate/potassium succinate system can allow\nouter wraps to be designed with Coresta porosities of up to 12 and still obtain greater than 70%\nsidestream reduction for a 17 mm circumference cigarette.\nA Superslims model with 50% of the Multifex chalk replaced by Albacar chalk in the\nouter wrap was tested on the MC Panel versus a control Superslims. No significant differences\nwere seen in any of the attributes. The only analytical difference was the slower burn rate of\nthe 50:50 model. Although both of these models were essentially similar in every respect, they\nwere both out of spec with regard to delivery (7 mg tar). Consequently, these models will be\nremade in Louisville to the correct tar delivery.\nLotus\nThe low sidestream panel evaluated full circumference cigarettes with the Superslims\ndouble wrap system on Marlboro blend. One model used 100% Multifex chalk, while the other\nmodel had a 50:50 Multifex/Albacar mixture as the inorganic filler. Although neither model\nwas judged to be subjectively acceptable, the panel could detect no differences between the\nmodels.\n2022155886\nC90-03066\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037\n\nQuestion: Who sent the letter?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Ted Sanders",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
402
|
Which part of Virginia is this letter sent from
|
Richmond
|
Page 1
PHILIP MORRIS U. S. A.
INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
Richmond, Virginia
To
Dr. K. S. Houghton
Date: June 11, 1990
From:
Ted Sanders
Subject:
Paper Technology Update for the Week of June 4
Reduced Sidestream
Trim
Short-term plans have been formulated to address customer complaints regarding
Virginia Slims Superslims. Models will be made which will evaluate lower tobacco density,
use of outer wraps coated with potassium phosphate and/or short chain dicarboxylic acids
(malonic and succinic), outer wraps containing mixed chalk (Albacar and Multifex), charcoal
filters, increased chalk content in the inner wrap, increased basis weight for the inner wrap, and
increased tar delivery (9 mg). A memo has been issued by Jeanette Hickle outlining the
schedule for making these models. A longer term approach directed at improving subjectives is
to design an outer wrap using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent but at a porosity
higher than has been investigated for full circumference cigarettes. Calculations have indicated
that the greater effectiveness of the Multifex calcium carbonate/mono potassium phosphate
system compared to the Multifex calcium carbonate/potassium succinate system can allow
outer wraps to be designed with Coresta porosities of up to 12 and still obtain greater than 70%
sidestream reduction for a 17 mm circumference cigarette.
A Superslims model with 50% of the Multifex chalk replaced by Albacar chalk in the
outer wrap was tested on the MC Panel versus a control Superslims. No significant differences
were seen in any of the attributes. The only analytical difference was the slower burn rate of
the 50:50 model. Although both of these models were essentially similar in every respect, they
were both out of spec with regard to delivery (7 mg tar). Consequently, these models will be
remade in Louisville to the correct tar delivery.
Lotus
The low sidestream panel evaluated full circumference cigarettes with the Superslims
double wrap system on Marlboro blend. One model used 100% Multifex chalk, while the other
model had a 50:50 Multifex/Albacar mixture as the inorganic filler. Although neither model
was judged to be subjectively acceptable, the panel could detect no differences between the
models.
2022155886
C90-03066
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 314,
"image": "nhxj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "nhxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 561
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS U. S. A.\nINTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\nTo\nDr. K. S. Houghton\nDate: June 11, 1990\nFrom:\nTed Sanders\nSubject:\nPaper Technology Update for the Week of June 4\nReduced Sidestream\nTrim\nShort-term plans have been formulated to address customer complaints regarding\nVirginia Slims Superslims. Models will be made which will evaluate lower tobacco density,\nuse of outer wraps coated with potassium phosphate and/or short chain dicarboxylic acids\n(malonic and succinic), outer wraps containing mixed chalk (Albacar and Multifex), charcoal\nfilters, increased chalk content in the inner wrap, increased basis weight for the inner wrap, and\nincreased tar delivery (9 mg). A memo has been issued by Jeanette Hickle outlining the\nschedule for making these models. A longer term approach directed at improving subjectives is\nto design an outer wrap using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent but at a porosity\nhigher than has been investigated for full circumference cigarettes. Calculations have indicated\nthat the greater effectiveness of the Multifex calcium carbonate/mono potassium phosphate\nsystem compared to the Multifex calcium carbonate/potassium succinate system can allow\nouter wraps to be designed with Coresta porosities of up to 12 and still obtain greater than 70%\nsidestream reduction for a 17 mm circumference cigarette.\nA Superslims model with 50% of the Multifex chalk replaced by Albacar chalk in the\nouter wrap was tested on the MC Panel versus a control Superslims. No significant differences\nwere seen in any of the attributes. The only analytical difference was the slower burn rate of\nthe 50:50 model. Although both of these models were essentially similar in every respect, they\nwere both out of spec with regard to delivery (7 mg tar). Consequently, these models will be\nremade in Louisville to the correct tar delivery.\nLotus\nThe low sidestream panel evaluated full circumference cigarettes with the Superslims\ndouble wrap system on Marlboro blend. One model used 100% Multifex chalk, while the other\nmodel had a 50:50 Multifex/Albacar mixture as the inorganic filler. Although neither model\nwas judged to be subjectively acceptable, the panel could detect no differences between the\nmodels.\n2022155886\nC90-03066\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037\n\nQuestion: Which part of Virginia is this letter sent from",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Richmond",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
411
|
What sort of communication/letter is this ?
|
INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
|
Page 1
PHILIP MORRIS. U. S. A.
INTER - OFFICE
CORRESPONDENCE
Richmond, Virginia
To :
Mr. James L. Myracle
Date: April 27, 1990
From :
H. L. Spielberg
Subject: Flavor. Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990
C90-03267
PROJECT ART :
Samples of the GMC, 8842-5 aftercut and POL 0704 models were sent to
ARD for method development and quantification of GMC on filler and in
solution. Preliminary analytical data indicate approximately 75% of the
target level of GMC is on the filler. Additional models were also submitted
for analyses.
These included the 208 and 408 reduced level, control level
and 208 increased level of GMC on filler.
The lowest acceptable OV study has been initiated on the 9 mg non-
menthol salesman samples. Models are complete at 10.8, 11.3, 11.9, 12.7,
13.0 and 13.68 OV. These models will be subjectively evaluated against a
control product at 13.08 OV.
Production of Next KS and 100's for the Tampa, Florida test market
began C Shift April 23, 1990 at the MC. Menthol production is complete and
non-menthol production will be complete by the end of the week.
Evaluations of citric acid stems from single versus double-batched
trials have shown promise at the 28 substitution level in Pilot RL. After
the Flavor Development panel showed the single to be comparable to double-
batched stems, results of the MC panel showed no differences between the
control and double-batched test RL in Marlboro.
Similar comparisons at the 58 substitution level in production RCB are
in progress .
Combinations of test RL and RCB will be selected to determine
utilization levels. Qualification of double-batched stems at specific
levels should allow usage of single or half-batched stems being tested at
Bermuda Hundred
Nippon ART concept Danchi test to evaluate tar and tipping color
variations has been shipped. A second Danchi test to evaluate ART menthol
levels has been shipped.
Small-scale samples were made to evaluate PM Super
Lights and "Castor" type flavors.
TAR/NICOTINE INTERACTION :
Subjective Studies :
A Tar/Nicotine interaction study to assess 1010 mm models from 3 to 15
mg tar and from 0.3 to 1.58 filler nicotine is in progress.
2022156205
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 352,
"image": "mxxj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mxxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 593
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS. U. S. A.\nINTER - OFFICE\nCORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\nTo :\nMr. James L. Myracle\nDate: April 27, 1990\nFrom :\nH. L. Spielberg\nSubject: Flavor. Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990\nC90-03267\nPROJECT ART :\nSamples of the GMC, 8842-5 aftercut and POL 0704 models were sent to\nARD for method development and quantification of GMC on filler and in\nsolution. Preliminary analytical data indicate approximately 75% of the\ntarget level of GMC is on the filler. Additional models were also submitted\nfor analyses.\nThese included the 208 and 408 reduced level, control level\nand 208 increased level of GMC on filler.\nThe lowest acceptable OV study has been initiated on the 9 mg non-\nmenthol salesman samples. Models are complete at 10.8, 11.3, 11.9, 12.7,\n13.0 and 13.68 OV. These models will be subjectively evaluated against a\ncontrol product at 13.08 OV.\nProduction of Next KS and 100's for the Tampa, Florida test market\nbegan C Shift April 23, 1990 at the MC. Menthol production is complete and\nnon-menthol production will be complete by the end of the week.\nEvaluations of citric acid stems from single versus double-batched\ntrials have shown promise at the 28 substitution level in Pilot RL. After\nthe Flavor Development panel showed the single to be comparable to double-\nbatched stems, results of the MC panel showed no differences between the\ncontrol and double-batched test RL in Marlboro.\nSimilar comparisons at the 58 substitution level in production RCB are\nin progress .\nCombinations of test RL and RCB will be selected to determine\nutilization levels. Qualification of double-batched stems at specific\nlevels should allow usage of single or half-batched stems being tested at\nBermuda Hundred\nNippon ART concept Danchi test to evaluate tar and tipping color\nvariations has been shipped. A second Danchi test to evaluate ART menthol\nlevels has been shipped.\nSmall-scale samples were made to evaluate PM Super\nLights and \"Castor\" type flavors.\nTAR/NICOTINE INTERACTION :\nSubjective Studies :\nA Tar/Nicotine interaction study to assess 1010 mm models from 3 to 15\nmg tar and from 0.3 to 1.58 filler nicotine is in progress.\n2022156205\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxxj0037\n\nQuestion: What sort of communication/letter is this ?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
412
|
What is the date mentioned in the letter?
|
April 27, 1990
|
Page 1
PHILIP MORRIS. U. S. A.
INTER - OFFICE
CORRESPONDENCE
Richmond, Virginia
To :
Mr. James L. Myracle
Date: April 27, 1990
From :
H. L. Spielberg
Subject: Flavor. Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990
C90-03267
PROJECT ART :
Samples of the GMC, 8842-5 aftercut and POL 0704 models were sent to
ARD for method development and quantification of GMC on filler and in
solution. Preliminary analytical data indicate approximately 75% of the
target level of GMC is on the filler. Additional models were also submitted
for analyses.
These included the 208 and 408 reduced level, control level
and 208 increased level of GMC on filler.
The lowest acceptable OV study has been initiated on the 9 mg non-
menthol salesman samples. Models are complete at 10.8, 11.3, 11.9, 12.7,
13.0 and 13.68 OV. These models will be subjectively evaluated against a
control product at 13.08 OV.
Production of Next KS and 100's for the Tampa, Florida test market
began C Shift April 23, 1990 at the MC. Menthol production is complete and
non-menthol production will be complete by the end of the week.
Evaluations of citric acid stems from single versus double-batched
trials have shown promise at the 28 substitution level in Pilot RL. After
the Flavor Development panel showed the single to be comparable to double-
batched stems, results of the MC panel showed no differences between the
control and double-batched test RL in Marlboro.
Similar comparisons at the 58 substitution level in production RCB are
in progress .
Combinations of test RL and RCB will be selected to determine
utilization levels. Qualification of double-batched stems at specific
levels should allow usage of single or half-batched stems being tested at
Bermuda Hundred
Nippon ART concept Danchi test to evaluate tar and tipping color
variations has been shipped. A second Danchi test to evaluate ART menthol
levels has been shipped.
Small-scale samples were made to evaluate PM Super
Lights and "Castor" type flavors.
TAR/NICOTINE INTERACTION :
Subjective Studies :
A Tar/Nicotine interaction study to assess 1010 mm models from 3 to 15
mg tar and from 0.3 to 1.58 filler nicotine is in progress.
2022156205
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 352,
"image": "mxxj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mxxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 592
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS. U. S. A.\nINTER - OFFICE\nCORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\nTo :\nMr. James L. Myracle\nDate: April 27, 1990\nFrom :\nH. L. Spielberg\nSubject: Flavor. Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990\nC90-03267\nPROJECT ART :\nSamples of the GMC, 8842-5 aftercut and POL 0704 models were sent to\nARD for method development and quantification of GMC on filler and in\nsolution. Preliminary analytical data indicate approximately 75% of the\ntarget level of GMC is on the filler. Additional models were also submitted\nfor analyses.\nThese included the 208 and 408 reduced level, control level\nand 208 increased level of GMC on filler.\nThe lowest acceptable OV study has been initiated on the 9 mg non-\nmenthol salesman samples. Models are complete at 10.8, 11.3, 11.9, 12.7,\n13.0 and 13.68 OV. These models will be subjectively evaluated against a\ncontrol product at 13.08 OV.\nProduction of Next KS and 100's for the Tampa, Florida test market\nbegan C Shift April 23, 1990 at the MC. Menthol production is complete and\nnon-menthol production will be complete by the end of the week.\nEvaluations of citric acid stems from single versus double-batched\ntrials have shown promise at the 28 substitution level in Pilot RL. After\nthe Flavor Development panel showed the single to be comparable to double-\nbatched stems, results of the MC panel showed no differences between the\ncontrol and double-batched test RL in Marlboro.\nSimilar comparisons at the 58 substitution level in production RCB are\nin progress .\nCombinations of test RL and RCB will be selected to determine\nutilization levels. Qualification of double-batched stems at specific\nlevels should allow usage of single or half-batched stems being tested at\nBermuda Hundred\nNippon ART concept Danchi test to evaluate tar and tipping color\nvariations has been shipped. A second Danchi test to evaluate ART menthol\nlevels has been shipped.\nSmall-scale samples were made to evaluate PM Super\nLights and \"Castor\" type flavors.\nTAR/NICOTINE INTERACTION :\nSubjective Studies :\nA Tar/Nicotine interaction study to assess 1010 mm models from 3 to 15\nmg tar and from 0.3 to 1.58 filler nicotine is in progress.\n2022156205\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxxj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the date mentioned in the letter?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "April 27, 1990",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
413
|
Which test is used to evaluate ART menthol levels that has been shipped?
|
A second Danchi Test
|
Page 1
PHILIP MORRIS. U. S. A.
INTER - OFFICE
CORRESPONDENCE
Richmond, Virginia
To :
Mr. James L. Myracle
Date: April 27, 1990
From :
H. L. Spielberg
Subject: Flavor. Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990
C90-03267
PROJECT ART :
Samples of the GMC, 8842-5 aftercut and POL 0704 models were sent to
ARD for method development and quantification of GMC on filler and in
solution. Preliminary analytical data indicate approximately 75% of the
target level of GMC is on the filler. Additional models were also submitted
for analyses.
These included the 208 and 408 reduced level, control level
and 208 increased level of GMC on filler.
The lowest acceptable OV study has been initiated on the 9 mg non-
menthol salesman samples. Models are complete at 10.8, 11.3, 11.9, 12.7,
13.0 and 13.68 OV. These models will be subjectively evaluated against a
control product at 13.08 OV.
Production of Next KS and 100's for the Tampa, Florida test market
began C Shift April 23, 1990 at the MC. Menthol production is complete and
non-menthol production will be complete by the end of the week.
Evaluations of citric acid stems from single versus double-batched
trials have shown promise at the 28 substitution level in Pilot RL. After
the Flavor Development panel showed the single to be comparable to double-
batched stems, results of the MC panel showed no differences between the
control and double-batched test RL in Marlboro.
Similar comparisons at the 58 substitution level in production RCB are
in progress .
Combinations of test RL and RCB will be selected to determine
utilization levels. Qualification of double-batched stems at specific
levels should allow usage of single or half-batched stems being tested at
Bermuda Hundred
Nippon ART concept Danchi test to evaluate tar and tipping color
variations has been shipped. A second Danchi test to evaluate ART menthol
levels has been shipped.
Small-scale samples were made to evaluate PM Super
Lights and "Castor" type flavors.
TAR/NICOTINE INTERACTION :
Subjective Studies :
A Tar/Nicotine interaction study to assess 1010 mm models from 3 to 15
mg tar and from 0.3 to 1.58 filler nicotine is in progress.
2022156205
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 352,
"image": "mxxj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mxxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 597
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS. U. S. A.\nINTER - OFFICE\nCORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\nTo :\nMr. James L. Myracle\nDate: April 27, 1990\nFrom :\nH. L. Spielberg\nSubject: Flavor. Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990\nC90-03267\nPROJECT ART :\nSamples of the GMC, 8842-5 aftercut and POL 0704 models were sent to\nARD for method development and quantification of GMC on filler and in\nsolution. Preliminary analytical data indicate approximately 75% of the\ntarget level of GMC is on the filler. Additional models were also submitted\nfor analyses.\nThese included the 208 and 408 reduced level, control level\nand 208 increased level of GMC on filler.\nThe lowest acceptable OV study has been initiated on the 9 mg non-\nmenthol salesman samples. Models are complete at 10.8, 11.3, 11.9, 12.7,\n13.0 and 13.68 OV. These models will be subjectively evaluated against a\ncontrol product at 13.08 OV.\nProduction of Next KS and 100's for the Tampa, Florida test market\nbegan C Shift April 23, 1990 at the MC. Menthol production is complete and\nnon-menthol production will be complete by the end of the week.\nEvaluations of citric acid stems from single versus double-batched\ntrials have shown promise at the 28 substitution level in Pilot RL. After\nthe Flavor Development panel showed the single to be comparable to double-\nbatched stems, results of the MC panel showed no differences between the\ncontrol and double-batched test RL in Marlboro.\nSimilar comparisons at the 58 substitution level in production RCB are\nin progress .\nCombinations of test RL and RCB will be selected to determine\nutilization levels. Qualification of double-batched stems at specific\nlevels should allow usage of single or half-batched stems being tested at\nBermuda Hundred\nNippon ART concept Danchi test to evaluate tar and tipping color\nvariations has been shipped. A second Danchi test to evaluate ART menthol\nlevels has been shipped.\nSmall-scale samples were made to evaluate PM Super\nLights and \"Castor\" type flavors.\nTAR/NICOTINE INTERACTION :\nSubjective Studies :\nA Tar/Nicotine interaction study to assess 1010 mm models from 3 to 15\nmg tar and from 0.3 to 1.58 filler nicotine is in progress.\n2022156205\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxxj0037\n\nQuestion: Which test is used to evaluate ART menthol levels that has been shipped?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A second Danchi Test",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
414
|
What is the subject of the document/letter?
|
Flavor Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990
|
Page 1
PHILIP MORRIS. U. S. A.
INTER - OFFICE
CORRESPONDENCE
Richmond, Virginia
To :
Mr. James L. Myracle
Date: April 27, 1990
From :
H. L. Spielberg
Subject: Flavor. Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990
C90-03267
PROJECT ART :
Samples of the GMC, 8842-5 aftercut and POL 0704 models were sent to
ARD for method development and quantification of GMC on filler and in
solution. Preliminary analytical data indicate approximately 75% of the
target level of GMC is on the filler. Additional models were also submitted
for analyses.
These included the 208 and 408 reduced level, control level
and 208 increased level of GMC on filler.
The lowest acceptable OV study has been initiated on the 9 mg non-
menthol salesman samples. Models are complete at 10.8, 11.3, 11.9, 12.7,
13.0 and 13.68 OV. These models will be subjectively evaluated against a
control product at 13.08 OV.
Production of Next KS and 100's for the Tampa, Florida test market
began C Shift April 23, 1990 at the MC. Menthol production is complete and
non-menthol production will be complete by the end of the week.
Evaluations of citric acid stems from single versus double-batched
trials have shown promise at the 28 substitution level in Pilot RL. After
the Flavor Development panel showed the single to be comparable to double-
batched stems, results of the MC panel showed no differences between the
control and double-batched test RL in Marlboro.
Similar comparisons at the 58 substitution level in production RCB are
in progress .
Combinations of test RL and RCB will be selected to determine
utilization levels. Qualification of double-batched stems at specific
levels should allow usage of single or half-batched stems being tested at
Bermuda Hundred
Nippon ART concept Danchi test to evaluate tar and tipping color
variations has been shipped. A second Danchi test to evaluate ART menthol
levels has been shipped.
Small-scale samples were made to evaluate PM Super
Lights and "Castor" type flavors.
TAR/NICOTINE INTERACTION :
Subjective Studies :
A Tar/Nicotine interaction study to assess 1010 mm models from 3 to 15
mg tar and from 0.3 to 1.58 filler nicotine is in progress.
2022156205
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 352,
"image": "mxxj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mxxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 597
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS. U. S. A.\nINTER - OFFICE\nCORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\nTo :\nMr. James L. Myracle\nDate: April 27, 1990\nFrom :\nH. L. Spielberg\nSubject: Flavor. Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990\nC90-03267\nPROJECT ART :\nSamples of the GMC, 8842-5 aftercut and POL 0704 models were sent to\nARD for method development and quantification of GMC on filler and in\nsolution. Preliminary analytical data indicate approximately 75% of the\ntarget level of GMC is on the filler. Additional models were also submitted\nfor analyses.\nThese included the 208 and 408 reduced level, control level\nand 208 increased level of GMC on filler.\nThe lowest acceptable OV study has been initiated on the 9 mg non-\nmenthol salesman samples. Models are complete at 10.8, 11.3, 11.9, 12.7,\n13.0 and 13.68 OV. These models will be subjectively evaluated against a\ncontrol product at 13.08 OV.\nProduction of Next KS and 100's for the Tampa, Florida test market\nbegan C Shift April 23, 1990 at the MC. Menthol production is complete and\nnon-menthol production will be complete by the end of the week.\nEvaluations of citric acid stems from single versus double-batched\ntrials have shown promise at the 28 substitution level in Pilot RL. After\nthe Flavor Development panel showed the single to be comparable to double-\nbatched stems, results of the MC panel showed no differences between the\ncontrol and double-batched test RL in Marlboro.\nSimilar comparisons at the 58 substitution level in production RCB are\nin progress .\nCombinations of test RL and RCB will be selected to determine\nutilization levels. Qualification of double-batched stems at specific\nlevels should allow usage of single or half-batched stems being tested at\nBermuda Hundred\nNippon ART concept Danchi test to evaluate tar and tipping color\nvariations has been shipped. A second Danchi test to evaluate ART menthol\nlevels has been shipped.\nSmall-scale samples were made to evaluate PM Super\nLights and \"Castor\" type flavors.\nTAR/NICOTINE INTERACTION :\nSubjective Studies :\nA Tar/Nicotine interaction study to assess 1010 mm models from 3 to 15\nmg tar and from 0.3 to 1.58 filler nicotine is in progress.\n2022156205\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxxj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the subject of the document/letter?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Flavor Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
416
|
what is the index for Retention of Franchise
|
100
|
Page 9
Consumer Dynamics
CARLTON
index
. Retention of Franchise:
81.3%
(100)
Rate of Switching Losses
9.3%
( 88)
Rate of Quitting Losses
9.4%
(113)
. Single Brand Users in the Franchise:
81.9%
(116)
. Share of Industry Switchers Gained:
1.7%
(100)
Share of the 21-25 Segment:
0.1%
( 6)
. ... .
314002838
Source: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 355,
"image": "rzbj0037_9.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rzbj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "9"
}
| 164
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 9\nConsumer Dynamics\nCARLTON\nindex\n. Retention of Franchise:\n81.3%\n(100)\nRate of Switching Losses\n9.3%\n( 88)\nRate of Quitting Losses\n9.4%\n(113)\n. Single Brand Users in the Franchise:\n81.9%\n(116)\n. Share of Industry Switchers Gained:\n1.7%\n(100)\nShare of the 21-25 Segment:\n0.1%\n( 6)\n. ... .\n314002838\nSource: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037\n\nQuestion: what is the index for Retention of Franchise",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "100",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
417
|
What is the source
|
USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data
|
Page 9
Consumer Dynamics
CARLTON
index
. Retention of Franchise:
81.3%
(100)
Rate of Switching Losses
9.3%
( 88)
Rate of Quitting Losses
9.4%
(113)
. Single Brand Users in the Franchise:
81.9%
(116)
. Share of Industry Switchers Gained:
1.7%
(100)
Share of the 21-25 Segment:
0.1%
( 6)
. ... .
314002838
Source: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 355,
"image": "rzbj0037_9.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rzbj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "9"
}
| 173
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 9\nConsumer Dynamics\nCARLTON\nindex\n. Retention of Franchise:\n81.3%\n(100)\nRate of Switching Losses\n9.3%\n( 88)\nRate of Quitting Losses\n9.4%\n(113)\n. Single Brand Users in the Franchise:\n81.9%\n(116)\n. Share of Industry Switchers Gained:\n1.7%\n(100)\nShare of the 21-25 Segment:\n0.1%\n( 6)\n. ... .\n314002838\nSource: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the source",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
418
|
The number mentioned on the right of the leftside margin?
|
314002838
|
Page 9
Consumer Dynamics
CARLTON
index
. Retention of Franchise:
81.3%
(100)
Rate of Switching Losses
9.3%
( 88)
Rate of Quitting Losses
9.4%
(113)
. Single Brand Users in the Franchise:
81.9%
(116)
. Share of Industry Switchers Gained:
1.7%
(100)
Share of the 21-25 Segment:
0.1%
( 6)
. ... .
314002838
Source: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 355,
"image": "rzbj0037_9.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rzbj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "9"
}
| 168
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 9\nConsumer Dynamics\nCARLTON\nindex\n. Retention of Franchise:\n81.3%\n(100)\nRate of Switching Losses\n9.3%\n( 88)\nRate of Quitting Losses\n9.4%\n(113)\n. Single Brand Users in the Franchise:\n81.9%\n(116)\n. Share of Industry Switchers Gained:\n1.7%\n(100)\nShare of the 21-25 Segment:\n0.1%\n( 6)\n. ... .\n314002838\nSource: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037\n\nQuestion: The number mentioned on the right of the leftside margin?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "314002838",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
419
|
Heading of the document
|
Domestic Product Development (cont'd.)
|
Page 3
DOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.)
Project Marlboro
- POL 0330 - 1.6 tar/puff - 80mm has been produced and currently is in C.I. for analytical.
- POL 0331 - 1.6 tar/puff - 84mm was produced 6/1/90. Samples have been submitted to C.I.
- Marlboro Double Batch - RL & RCB was produced 6/4/90. Samples have been submitted for
analytical testing.
- POL 3634 - RL Evaporator Upgrade - Scheduling for primary at the M/C has been completed.
Fabrication is scheduled for the week of 6/18/90 in Semiworks.
Marlboro Menthol
Marlboro Menthol 80mm and 83mm were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel.
After further review of the data and specifications, another model of the 83mm with zero
ventilation will be made at Semiworks within the next 2-3 weeks.
Bucks
Bucks K.S. Lights and Full Flavor with various aftercut modifications were smoked by the
Richmond Panel. Particular models were selected from the group and POL testing will be done
on these prototypes.
Miscellaneous
Additional tipping papers of Marlboro Lights have been received and currently are being
analyzed for lip release coatings. Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for
evaluation of lip release.
Competitive Testing
HTI 4845, Cambridge 85's versus Doral 85's - These samples were shipped on 6/4/90.
POL 0912, Virginia Slims Lights Menthol versus Salem Slims Lights - A new production
sample has been submitted for analytical testing.
POL 0917, Marlboro 80 versus Camel 80 - These samples were approved both analytically
and subjectively and are in open/overtip/repack status.
3
2022155853
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 298,
"image": "khxj0037_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "khxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 445
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nDOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.)\nProject Marlboro\n- POL 0330 - 1.6 tar/puff - 80mm has been produced and currently is in C.I. for analytical.\n- POL 0331 - 1.6 tar/puff - 84mm was produced 6/1/90. Samples have been submitted to C.I.\n- Marlboro Double Batch - RL & RCB was produced 6/4/90. Samples have been submitted for\nanalytical testing.\n- POL 3634 - RL Evaporator Upgrade - Scheduling for primary at the M/C has been completed.\nFabrication is scheduled for the week of 6/18/90 in Semiworks.\nMarlboro Menthol\nMarlboro Menthol 80mm and 83mm were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel.\nAfter further review of the data and specifications, another model of the 83mm with zero\nventilation will be made at Semiworks within the next 2-3 weeks.\nBucks\nBucks K.S. Lights and Full Flavor with various aftercut modifications were smoked by the\nRichmond Panel. Particular models were selected from the group and POL testing will be done\non these prototypes.\nMiscellaneous\nAdditional tipping papers of Marlboro Lights have been received and currently are being\nanalyzed for lip release coatings. Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for\nevaluation of lip release.\nCompetitive Testing\nHTI 4845, Cambridge 85's versus Doral 85's - These samples were shipped on 6/4/90.\nPOL 0912, Virginia Slims Lights Menthol versus Salem Slims Lights - A new production\nsample has been submitted for analytical testing.\nPOL 0917, Marlboro 80 versus Camel 80 - These samples were approved both analytically\nand subjectively and are in open/overtip/repack status.\n3\n2022155853\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037\n\nQuestion: Heading of the document",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Domestic Product Development (cont'd.)",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
420
|
what mm Marlboro Menthol were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel
|
80mm and 83mm
|
Page 3
DOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.)
Project Marlboro
- POL 0330 - 1.6 tar/puff - 80mm has been produced and currently is in C.I. for analytical.
- POL 0331 - 1.6 tar/puff - 84mm was produced 6/1/90. Samples have been submitted to C.I.
- Marlboro Double Batch - RL & RCB was produced 6/4/90. Samples have been submitted for
analytical testing.
- POL 3634 - RL Evaporator Upgrade - Scheduling for primary at the M/C has been completed.
Fabrication is scheduled for the week of 6/18/90 in Semiworks.
Marlboro Menthol
Marlboro Menthol 80mm and 83mm were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel.
After further review of the data and specifications, another model of the 83mm with zero
ventilation will be made at Semiworks within the next 2-3 weeks.
Bucks
Bucks K.S. Lights and Full Flavor with various aftercut modifications were smoked by the
Richmond Panel. Particular models were selected from the group and POL testing will be done
on these prototypes.
Miscellaneous
Additional tipping papers of Marlboro Lights have been received and currently are being
analyzed for lip release coatings. Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for
evaluation of lip release.
Competitive Testing
HTI 4845, Cambridge 85's versus Doral 85's - These samples were shipped on 6/4/90.
POL 0912, Virginia Slims Lights Menthol versus Salem Slims Lights - A new production
sample has been submitted for analytical testing.
POL 0917, Marlboro 80 versus Camel 80 - These samples were approved both analytically
and subjectively and are in open/overtip/repack status.
3
2022155853
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 298,
"image": "khxj0037_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "khxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 453
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nDOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.)\nProject Marlboro\n- POL 0330 - 1.6 tar/puff - 80mm has been produced and currently is in C.I. for analytical.\n- POL 0331 - 1.6 tar/puff - 84mm was produced 6/1/90. Samples have been submitted to C.I.\n- Marlboro Double Batch - RL & RCB was produced 6/4/90. Samples have been submitted for\nanalytical testing.\n- POL 3634 - RL Evaporator Upgrade - Scheduling for primary at the M/C has been completed.\nFabrication is scheduled for the week of 6/18/90 in Semiworks.\nMarlboro Menthol\nMarlboro Menthol 80mm and 83mm were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel.\nAfter further review of the data and specifications, another model of the 83mm with zero\nventilation will be made at Semiworks within the next 2-3 weeks.\nBucks\nBucks K.S. Lights and Full Flavor with various aftercut modifications were smoked by the\nRichmond Panel. Particular models were selected from the group and POL testing will be done\non these prototypes.\nMiscellaneous\nAdditional tipping papers of Marlboro Lights have been received and currently are being\nanalyzed for lip release coatings. Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for\nevaluation of lip release.\nCompetitive Testing\nHTI 4845, Cambridge 85's versus Doral 85's - These samples were shipped on 6/4/90.\nPOL 0912, Virginia Slims Lights Menthol versus Salem Slims Lights - A new production\nsample has been submitted for analytical testing.\nPOL 0917, Marlboro 80 versus Camel 80 - These samples were approved both analytically\nand subjectively and are in open/overtip/repack status.\n3\n2022155853\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037\n\nQuestion: what mm Marlboro Menthol were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "80mm and 83mm",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
421
|
Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for what purpose?
|
evaluation of lip release
|
Page 3
DOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.)
Project Marlboro
- POL 0330 - 1.6 tar/puff - 80mm has been produced and currently is in C.I. for analytical.
- POL 0331 - 1.6 tar/puff - 84mm was produced 6/1/90. Samples have been submitted to C.I.
- Marlboro Double Batch - RL & RCB was produced 6/4/90. Samples have been submitted for
analytical testing.
- POL 3634 - RL Evaporator Upgrade - Scheduling for primary at the M/C has been completed.
Fabrication is scheduled for the week of 6/18/90 in Semiworks.
Marlboro Menthol
Marlboro Menthol 80mm and 83mm were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel.
After further review of the data and specifications, another model of the 83mm with zero
ventilation will be made at Semiworks within the next 2-3 weeks.
Bucks
Bucks K.S. Lights and Full Flavor with various aftercut modifications were smoked by the
Richmond Panel. Particular models were selected from the group and POL testing will be done
on these prototypes.
Miscellaneous
Additional tipping papers of Marlboro Lights have been received and currently are being
analyzed for lip release coatings. Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for
evaluation of lip release.
Competitive Testing
HTI 4845, Cambridge 85's versus Doral 85's - These samples were shipped on 6/4/90.
POL 0912, Virginia Slims Lights Menthol versus Salem Slims Lights - A new production
sample has been submitted for analytical testing.
POL 0917, Marlboro 80 versus Camel 80 - These samples were approved both analytically
and subjectively and are in open/overtip/repack status.
3
2022155853
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 298,
"image": "khxj0037_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "khxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 453
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nDOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.)\nProject Marlboro\n- POL 0330 - 1.6 tar/puff - 80mm has been produced and currently is in C.I. for analytical.\n- POL 0331 - 1.6 tar/puff - 84mm was produced 6/1/90. Samples have been submitted to C.I.\n- Marlboro Double Batch - RL & RCB was produced 6/4/90. Samples have been submitted for\nanalytical testing.\n- POL 3634 - RL Evaporator Upgrade - Scheduling for primary at the M/C has been completed.\nFabrication is scheduled for the week of 6/18/90 in Semiworks.\nMarlboro Menthol\nMarlboro Menthol 80mm and 83mm were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel.\nAfter further review of the data and specifications, another model of the 83mm with zero\nventilation will be made at Semiworks within the next 2-3 weeks.\nBucks\nBucks K.S. Lights and Full Flavor with various aftercut modifications were smoked by the\nRichmond Panel. Particular models were selected from the group and POL testing will be done\non these prototypes.\nMiscellaneous\nAdditional tipping papers of Marlboro Lights have been received and currently are being\nanalyzed for lip release coatings. Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for\nevaluation of lip release.\nCompetitive Testing\nHTI 4845, Cambridge 85's versus Doral 85's - These samples were shipped on 6/4/90.\nPOL 0912, Virginia Slims Lights Menthol versus Salem Slims Lights - A new production\nsample has been submitted for analytical testing.\nPOL 0917, Marlboro 80 versus Camel 80 - These samples were approved both analytically\nand subjectively and are in open/overtip/repack status.\n3\n2022155853\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037\n\nQuestion: Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for what purpose?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "evaluation of lip release",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
422
|
Another model of the 83mm with zero ventilation will be made at Semiworks within how many weeks
|
next 2-3 weeks
|
Page 3
DOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.)
Project Marlboro
- POL 0330 - 1.6 tar/puff - 80mm has been produced and currently is in C.I. for analytical.
- POL 0331 - 1.6 tar/puff - 84mm was produced 6/1/90. Samples have been submitted to C.I.
- Marlboro Double Batch - RL & RCB was produced 6/4/90. Samples have been submitted for
analytical testing.
- POL 3634 - RL Evaporator Upgrade - Scheduling for primary at the M/C has been completed.
Fabrication is scheduled for the week of 6/18/90 in Semiworks.
Marlboro Menthol
Marlboro Menthol 80mm and 83mm were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel.
After further review of the data and specifications, another model of the 83mm with zero
ventilation will be made at Semiworks within the next 2-3 weeks.
Bucks
Bucks K.S. Lights and Full Flavor with various aftercut modifications were smoked by the
Richmond Panel. Particular models were selected from the group and POL testing will be done
on these prototypes.
Miscellaneous
Additional tipping papers of Marlboro Lights have been received and currently are being
analyzed for lip release coatings. Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for
evaluation of lip release.
Competitive Testing
HTI 4845, Cambridge 85's versus Doral 85's - These samples were shipped on 6/4/90.
POL 0912, Virginia Slims Lights Menthol versus Salem Slims Lights - A new production
sample has been submitted for analytical testing.
POL 0917, Marlboro 80 versus Camel 80 - These samples were approved both analytically
and subjectively and are in open/overtip/repack status.
3
2022155853
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 298,
"image": "khxj0037_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "khxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 459
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nDOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.)\nProject Marlboro\n- POL 0330 - 1.6 tar/puff - 80mm has been produced and currently is in C.I. for analytical.\n- POL 0331 - 1.6 tar/puff - 84mm was produced 6/1/90. Samples have been submitted to C.I.\n- Marlboro Double Batch - RL & RCB was produced 6/4/90. Samples have been submitted for\nanalytical testing.\n- POL 3634 - RL Evaporator Upgrade - Scheduling for primary at the M/C has been completed.\nFabrication is scheduled for the week of 6/18/90 in Semiworks.\nMarlboro Menthol\nMarlboro Menthol 80mm and 83mm were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel.\nAfter further review of the data and specifications, another model of the 83mm with zero\nventilation will be made at Semiworks within the next 2-3 weeks.\nBucks\nBucks K.S. Lights and Full Flavor with various aftercut modifications were smoked by the\nRichmond Panel. Particular models were selected from the group and POL testing will be done\non these prototypes.\nMiscellaneous\nAdditional tipping papers of Marlboro Lights have been received and currently are being\nanalyzed for lip release coatings. Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for\nevaluation of lip release.\nCompetitive Testing\nHTI 4845, Cambridge 85's versus Doral 85's - These samples were shipped on 6/4/90.\nPOL 0912, Virginia Slims Lights Menthol versus Salem Slims Lights - A new production\nsample has been submitted for analytical testing.\nPOL 0917, Marlboro 80 versus Camel 80 - These samples were approved both analytically\nand subjectively and are in open/overtip/repack status.\n3\n2022155853\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037\n\nQuestion: Another model of the 83mm with zero ventilation will be made at Semiworks within how many weeks",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "next 2-3 weeks",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
424
|
Under BOLD, primary production of Blend #24- will be completed by which date
|
6/7/90
|
Page 2
DOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.)
Menthol
POL 0618 (0.3mg tar/puff and 0.05mg menthol/puff was shipped on June 1, 1990. POL
0414 (1.4mg tar/puff and 0.02mg menthol/puff) closes out on June 6, 1990; POL 0422 (1.8mg
tar/puff and 0.09mg menthol/puff) and POL 0417 (0.3mg tar/puff and 0.05mg menthol/puff)
close out on June 7, 1990.
Best of the Lowest
BOLD
Primary production of Blend #240 will be completed 6/7/90. A light Total Blend Casing
with a sweet-type aftercut (8951-10) will be the flavor system used for POL 0268. The
test is scheduled in make/pack next week
Ambrosia I
POL 7191 (9mg versus 11mg) is being made. A factory trial is tentatively being planned
for around 6/18/90. Development continues on flow controllers from R&D and Engineering.
Ambrosia II
The 100mm POLs #0535 (LSS), #0536 (LSS/Low Odor) and #0537 (Low Odor) have
been completed and will be shipped this week. Three 85mm POLs, #0266, #0267, and #0270
have also been made and are scheduled to be shipped the week of June 11. Five 85mm
menthol models have been produced and have been submitted for analytical evaluation.
Cigarette paper is expected to arrive on June 8 for production of three 85mm menthol POLs
during the week of June 11.
During the process of prototype production and ringtipping, some cigarettes were observed
to have burn holes in the cigarette paper. These holes are believed to have been caused by
buildup on the electrodes of the perforator. Steps are being taken to further investigate and
prevent this occurrence.
2
2022155852
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 299,
"image": "khxj0037_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "khxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 507
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nDOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.)\nMenthol\nPOL 0618 (0.3mg tar/puff and 0.05mg menthol/puff was shipped on June 1, 1990. POL\n0414 (1.4mg tar/puff and 0.02mg menthol/puff) closes out on June 6, 1990; POL 0422 (1.8mg\ntar/puff and 0.09mg menthol/puff) and POL 0417 (0.3mg tar/puff and 0.05mg menthol/puff)\nclose out on June 7, 1990.\nBest of the Lowest\nBOLD\nPrimary production of Blend #240 will be completed 6/7/90. A light Total Blend Casing\nwith a sweet-type aftercut (8951-10) will be the flavor system used for POL 0268. The\ntest is scheduled in make/pack next week\nAmbrosia I\nPOL 7191 (9mg versus 11mg) is being made. A factory trial is tentatively being planned\nfor around 6/18/90. Development continues on flow controllers from R&D and Engineering.\nAmbrosia II\nThe 100mm POLs #0535 (LSS), #0536 (LSS/Low Odor) and #0537 (Low Odor) have\nbeen completed and will be shipped this week. Three 85mm POLs, #0266, #0267, and #0270\nhave also been made and are scheduled to be shipped the week of June 11. Five 85mm\nmenthol models have been produced and have been submitted for analytical evaluation.\nCigarette paper is expected to arrive on June 8 for production of three 85mm menthol POLs\nduring the week of June 11.\nDuring the process of prototype production and ringtipping, some cigarettes were observed\nto have burn holes in the cigarette paper. These holes are believed to have been caused by\nbuildup on the electrodes of the perforator. Steps are being taken to further investigate and\nprevent this occurrence.\n2\n2022155852\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037\n\nQuestion: Under BOLD, primary production of Blend #24- will be completed by which date",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "6/7/90",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
426
|
During the process of prototype production and ringtipping, some cigarettes were observed to have burn holed in which paper
|
Cigarette paper
|
Page 2
DOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.)
Menthol
POL 0618 (0.3mg tar/puff and 0.05mg menthol/puff was shipped on June 1, 1990. POL
0414 (1.4mg tar/puff and 0.02mg menthol/puff) closes out on June 6, 1990; POL 0422 (1.8mg
tar/puff and 0.09mg menthol/puff) and POL 0417 (0.3mg tar/puff and 0.05mg menthol/puff)
close out on June 7, 1990.
Best of the Lowest
BOLD
Primary production of Blend #240 will be completed 6/7/90. A light Total Blend Casing
with a sweet-type aftercut (8951-10) will be the flavor system used for POL 0268. The
test is scheduled in make/pack next week
Ambrosia I
POL 7191 (9mg versus 11mg) is being made. A factory trial is tentatively being planned
for around 6/18/90. Development continues on flow controllers from R&D and Engineering.
Ambrosia II
The 100mm POLs #0535 (LSS), #0536 (LSS/Low Odor) and #0537 (Low Odor) have
been completed and will be shipped this week. Three 85mm POLs, #0266, #0267, and #0270
have also been made and are scheduled to be shipped the week of June 11. Five 85mm
menthol models have been produced and have been submitted for analytical evaluation.
Cigarette paper is expected to arrive on June 8 for production of three 85mm menthol POLs
during the week of June 11.
During the process of prototype production and ringtipping, some cigarettes were observed
to have burn holes in the cigarette paper. These holes are believed to have been caused by
buildup on the electrodes of the perforator. Steps are being taken to further investigate and
prevent this occurrence.
2
2022155852
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 299,
"image": "khxj0037_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "khxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 512
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nDOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.)\nMenthol\nPOL 0618 (0.3mg tar/puff and 0.05mg menthol/puff was shipped on June 1, 1990. POL\n0414 (1.4mg tar/puff and 0.02mg menthol/puff) closes out on June 6, 1990; POL 0422 (1.8mg\ntar/puff and 0.09mg menthol/puff) and POL 0417 (0.3mg tar/puff and 0.05mg menthol/puff)\nclose out on June 7, 1990.\nBest of the Lowest\nBOLD\nPrimary production of Blend #240 will be completed 6/7/90. A light Total Blend Casing\nwith a sweet-type aftercut (8951-10) will be the flavor system used for POL 0268. The\ntest is scheduled in make/pack next week\nAmbrosia I\nPOL 7191 (9mg versus 11mg) is being made. A factory trial is tentatively being planned\nfor around 6/18/90. Development continues on flow controllers from R&D and Engineering.\nAmbrosia II\nThe 100mm POLs #0535 (LSS), #0536 (LSS/Low Odor) and #0537 (Low Odor) have\nbeen completed and will be shipped this week. Three 85mm POLs, #0266, #0267, and #0270\nhave also been made and are scheduled to be shipped the week of June 11. Five 85mm\nmenthol models have been produced and have been submitted for analytical evaluation.\nCigarette paper is expected to arrive on June 8 for production of three 85mm menthol POLs\nduring the week of June 11.\nDuring the process of prototype production and ringtipping, some cigarettes were observed\nto have burn holes in the cigarette paper. These holes are believed to have been caused by\nbuildup on the electrodes of the perforator. Steps are being taken to further investigate and\nprevent this occurrence.\n2\n2022155852\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037\n\nQuestion: During the process of prototype production and ringtipping, some cigarettes were observed to have burn holed in which paper",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Cigarette paper",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
434
|
Heading of the document?
|
Memorandum
|
Page 1
. ' . . -7
In 22. BY
* se , up
MEMORANDUM
TO :
From :
Mr. R. Rugh Honeycutt
Subject:
A. J. Baker
The Aerodynamics of Swirl
Date:
October 1, 1984
SUMMARY
The conference on "smoke swirl," held at BAW Headquarters,
brought together various elements of the BAT organization with the
goal of cummunication of results associated with experimentation on
directed velocity systems with filter designs. This brief report
documents impressions gained by the writer on the broad issue.
DISCUSSION
1.
The results presented by the Southhampton and Hamburg groups
on directed smoke jets verify the ability of filter design to position
the interaction of smoke jet columns at various locations within the
oral cavity.
The data on the desirability of one specific
configuration in comparison to alternatives was less conclusive.
Clearly, rather comprehensive testing matrices with smoker panels will
be required to determine the relative efficiency of specific designs.
2. Prior to commission of the financial resources to conduct
these tests and correlate the data, it appears desirable to conduct
definitive laboratory tests (and perhaps, theoretical fluid dynamics
analyses) to isolate exact cause and effect relations of filter
design. Specifically, the use of the word "swirl" to characterize
all flows that are not unidirectional,
oversimplification.
is probably an
At least two distinct mechanisms appear to play
a role in the breakup of a smoke column into a multi-dimensional
flowfield. Specifically, the multiple jet geometry of an Actron-type
design appears to generate a vortex flowfield that in a steady-flow
manner can rapidly disperse the smoke column. Alternatively, as a
function of smoke column preconditioning by a filter (or tobacco rod),
the data presented by kelly St. Charles (BW) and Martin Duke
(Southampton )
for a single column system, seemed to confirm existence
of a time-varying unsteadiness in smake column stability which results
in breakup and multi-dimensional dispersion.
distinctly different from the
This mechanism appears
"Actron" flowfield, although both
indeed result in enhanced dispersion characteristics.
3.
I would suggest that BEW consider a refinement of the
associated laboratory experiment designs to generate discriminating
data. One variable that has implicitly not been controlled is the
influence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry. It is possible
that acoustic pressure reflections off the chamber walls might exert
comCO . 3601A Chapman Highway . Isnoxville, TN 37920 . Phone: (615) 577-5494
501102013
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nmcj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 303,
"image": "nmcj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "nmcj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 593
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\n. ' . . -7\nIn 22. BY\n* se , up\nMEMORANDUM\nTO :\nFrom :\nMr. R. Rugh Honeycutt\nSubject:\nA. J. Baker\nThe Aerodynamics of Swirl\nDate:\nOctober 1, 1984\nSUMMARY\nThe conference on \"smoke swirl,\" held at BAW Headquarters,\nbrought together various elements of the BAT organization with the\ngoal of cummunication of results associated with experimentation on\ndirected velocity systems with filter designs. This brief report\ndocuments impressions gained by the writer on the broad issue.\nDISCUSSION\n1.\nThe results presented by the Southhampton and Hamburg groups\non directed smoke jets verify the ability of filter design to position\nthe interaction of smoke jet columns at various locations within the\noral cavity.\nThe data on the desirability of one specific\nconfiguration in comparison to alternatives was less conclusive.\nClearly, rather comprehensive testing matrices with smoker panels will\nbe required to determine the relative efficiency of specific designs.\n2. Prior to commission of the financial resources to conduct\nthese tests and correlate the data, it appears desirable to conduct\ndefinitive laboratory tests (and perhaps, theoretical fluid dynamics\nanalyses) to isolate exact cause and effect relations of filter\ndesign. Specifically, the use of the word \"swirl\" to characterize\nall flows that are not unidirectional,\noversimplification.\nis probably an\nAt least two distinct mechanisms appear to play\na role in the breakup of a smoke column into a multi-dimensional\nflowfield. Specifically, the multiple jet geometry of an Actron-type\ndesign appears to generate a vortex flowfield that in a steady-flow\nmanner can rapidly disperse the smoke column. Alternatively, as a\nfunction of smoke column preconditioning by a filter (or tobacco rod),\nthe data presented by kelly St. Charles (BW) and Martin Duke\n(Southampton )\nfor a single column system, seemed to confirm existence\nof a time-varying unsteadiness in smake column stability which results\nin breakup and multi-dimensional dispersion.\ndistinctly different from the\nThis mechanism appears\n\"Actron\" flowfield, although both\nindeed result in enhanced dispersion characteristics.\n3.\nI would suggest that BEW consider a refinement of the\nassociated laboratory experiment designs to generate discriminating\ndata. One variable that has implicitly not been controlled is the\ninfluence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry. It is possible\nthat acoustic pressure reflections off the chamber walls might exert\ncomCO . 3601A Chapman Highway . Isnoxville, TN 37920 . Phone: (615) 577-5494\n501102013\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nmcj0037\n\nQuestion: Heading of the document?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Memorandum",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
435
|
Where was the conference held?
|
B&W headquarters
|
Page 1
. ' . . -7
In 22. BY
* se , up
MEMORANDUM
TO :
From :
Mr. R. Rugh Honeycutt
Subject:
A. J. Baker
The Aerodynamics of Swirl
Date:
October 1, 1984
SUMMARY
The conference on "smoke swirl," held at BAW Headquarters,
brought together various elements of the BAT organization with the
goal of cummunication of results associated with experimentation on
directed velocity systems with filter designs. This brief report
documents impressions gained by the writer on the broad issue.
DISCUSSION
1.
The results presented by the Southhampton and Hamburg groups
on directed smoke jets verify the ability of filter design to position
the interaction of smoke jet columns at various locations within the
oral cavity.
The data on the desirability of one specific
configuration in comparison to alternatives was less conclusive.
Clearly, rather comprehensive testing matrices with smoker panels will
be required to determine the relative efficiency of specific designs.
2. Prior to commission of the financial resources to conduct
these tests and correlate the data, it appears desirable to conduct
definitive laboratory tests (and perhaps, theoretical fluid dynamics
analyses) to isolate exact cause and effect relations of filter
design. Specifically, the use of the word "swirl" to characterize
all flows that are not unidirectional,
oversimplification.
is probably an
At least two distinct mechanisms appear to play
a role in the breakup of a smoke column into a multi-dimensional
flowfield. Specifically, the multiple jet geometry of an Actron-type
design appears to generate a vortex flowfield that in a steady-flow
manner can rapidly disperse the smoke column. Alternatively, as a
function of smoke column preconditioning by a filter (or tobacco rod),
the data presented by kelly St. Charles (BW) and Martin Duke
(Southampton )
for a single column system, seemed to confirm existence
of a time-varying unsteadiness in smake column stability which results
in breakup and multi-dimensional dispersion.
distinctly different from the
This mechanism appears
"Actron" flowfield, although both
indeed result in enhanced dispersion characteristics.
3.
I would suggest that BEW consider a refinement of the
associated laboratory experiment designs to generate discriminating
data. One variable that has implicitly not been controlled is the
influence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry. It is possible
that acoustic pressure reflections off the chamber walls might exert
comCO . 3601A Chapman Highway . Isnoxville, TN 37920 . Phone: (615) 577-5494
501102013
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nmcj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 303,
"image": "nmcj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "nmcj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 594
|
none
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\n. ' . . -7\nIn 22. BY\n* se , up\nMEMORANDUM\nTO :\nFrom :\nMr. R. Rugh Honeycutt\nSubject:\nA. J. Baker\nThe Aerodynamics of Swirl\nDate:\nOctober 1, 1984\nSUMMARY\nThe conference on \"smoke swirl,\" held at BAW Headquarters,\nbrought together various elements of the BAT organization with the\ngoal of cummunication of results associated with experimentation on\ndirected velocity systems with filter designs. This brief report\ndocuments impressions gained by the writer on the broad issue.\nDISCUSSION\n1.\nThe results presented by the Southhampton and Hamburg groups\non directed smoke jets verify the ability of filter design to position\nthe interaction of smoke jet columns at various locations within the\noral cavity.\nThe data on the desirability of one specific\nconfiguration in comparison to alternatives was less conclusive.\nClearly, rather comprehensive testing matrices with smoker panels will\nbe required to determine the relative efficiency of specific designs.\n2. Prior to commission of the financial resources to conduct\nthese tests and correlate the data, it appears desirable to conduct\ndefinitive laboratory tests (and perhaps, theoretical fluid dynamics\nanalyses) to isolate exact cause and effect relations of filter\ndesign. Specifically, the use of the word \"swirl\" to characterize\nall flows that are not unidirectional,\noversimplification.\nis probably an\nAt least two distinct mechanisms appear to play\na role in the breakup of a smoke column into a multi-dimensional\nflowfield. Specifically, the multiple jet geometry of an Actron-type\ndesign appears to generate a vortex flowfield that in a steady-flow\nmanner can rapidly disperse the smoke column. Alternatively, as a\nfunction of smoke column preconditioning by a filter (or tobacco rod),\nthe data presented by kelly St. Charles (BW) and Martin Duke\n(Southampton )\nfor a single column system, seemed to confirm existence\nof a time-varying unsteadiness in smake column stability which results\nin breakup and multi-dimensional dispersion.\ndistinctly different from the\nThis mechanism appears\n\"Actron\" flowfield, although both\nindeed result in enhanced dispersion characteristics.\n3.\nI would suggest that BEW consider a refinement of the\nassociated laboratory experiment designs to generate discriminating\ndata. One variable that has implicitly not been controlled is the\ninfluence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry. It is possible\nthat acoustic pressure reflections off the chamber walls might exert\ncomCO . 3601A Chapman Highway . Isnoxville, TN 37920 . Phone: (615) 577-5494\n501102013\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nmcj0037\n\nQuestion: Where was the conference held?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B&W headquarters",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
437
|
How many distinct mechanisms appear to play a role in the breakup of a smoke column into a multi-dimensional flowfield?
|
At least two
|
Page 1
. ' . . -7
In 22. BY
* se , up
MEMORANDUM
TO :
From :
Mr. R. Rugh Honeycutt
Subject:
A. J. Baker
The Aerodynamics of Swirl
Date:
October 1, 1984
SUMMARY
The conference on "smoke swirl," held at BAW Headquarters,
brought together various elements of the BAT organization with the
goal of cummunication of results associated with experimentation on
directed velocity systems with filter designs. This brief report
documents impressions gained by the writer on the broad issue.
DISCUSSION
1.
The results presented by the Southhampton and Hamburg groups
on directed smoke jets verify the ability of filter design to position
the interaction of smoke jet columns at various locations within the
oral cavity.
The data on the desirability of one specific
configuration in comparison to alternatives was less conclusive.
Clearly, rather comprehensive testing matrices with smoker panels will
be required to determine the relative efficiency of specific designs.
2. Prior to commission of the financial resources to conduct
these tests and correlate the data, it appears desirable to conduct
definitive laboratory tests (and perhaps, theoretical fluid dynamics
analyses) to isolate exact cause and effect relations of filter
design. Specifically, the use of the word "swirl" to characterize
all flows that are not unidirectional,
oversimplification.
is probably an
At least two distinct mechanisms appear to play
a role in the breakup of a smoke column into a multi-dimensional
flowfield. Specifically, the multiple jet geometry of an Actron-type
design appears to generate a vortex flowfield that in a steady-flow
manner can rapidly disperse the smoke column. Alternatively, as a
function of smoke column preconditioning by a filter (or tobacco rod),
the data presented by kelly St. Charles (BW) and Martin Duke
(Southampton )
for a single column system, seemed to confirm existence
of a time-varying unsteadiness in smake column stability which results
in breakup and multi-dimensional dispersion.
distinctly different from the
This mechanism appears
"Actron" flowfield, although both
indeed result in enhanced dispersion characteristics.
3.
I would suggest that BEW consider a refinement of the
associated laboratory experiment designs to generate discriminating
data. One variable that has implicitly not been controlled is the
influence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry. It is possible
that acoustic pressure reflections off the chamber walls might exert
comCO . 3601A Chapman Highway . Isnoxville, TN 37920 . Phone: (615) 577-5494
501102013
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nmcj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 303,
"image": "nmcj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "nmcj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 611
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\n. ' . . -7\nIn 22. BY\n* se , up\nMEMORANDUM\nTO :\nFrom :\nMr. R. Rugh Honeycutt\nSubject:\nA. J. Baker\nThe Aerodynamics of Swirl\nDate:\nOctober 1, 1984\nSUMMARY\nThe conference on \"smoke swirl,\" held at BAW Headquarters,\nbrought together various elements of the BAT organization with the\ngoal of cummunication of results associated with experimentation on\ndirected velocity systems with filter designs. This brief report\ndocuments impressions gained by the writer on the broad issue.\nDISCUSSION\n1.\nThe results presented by the Southhampton and Hamburg groups\non directed smoke jets verify the ability of filter design to position\nthe interaction of smoke jet columns at various locations within the\noral cavity.\nThe data on the desirability of one specific\nconfiguration in comparison to alternatives was less conclusive.\nClearly, rather comprehensive testing matrices with smoker panels will\nbe required to determine the relative efficiency of specific designs.\n2. Prior to commission of the financial resources to conduct\nthese tests and correlate the data, it appears desirable to conduct\ndefinitive laboratory tests (and perhaps, theoretical fluid dynamics\nanalyses) to isolate exact cause and effect relations of filter\ndesign. Specifically, the use of the word \"swirl\" to characterize\nall flows that are not unidirectional,\noversimplification.\nis probably an\nAt least two distinct mechanisms appear to play\na role in the breakup of a smoke column into a multi-dimensional\nflowfield. Specifically, the multiple jet geometry of an Actron-type\ndesign appears to generate a vortex flowfield that in a steady-flow\nmanner can rapidly disperse the smoke column. Alternatively, as a\nfunction of smoke column preconditioning by a filter (or tobacco rod),\nthe data presented by kelly St. Charles (BW) and Martin Duke\n(Southampton )\nfor a single column system, seemed to confirm existence\nof a time-varying unsteadiness in smake column stability which results\nin breakup and multi-dimensional dispersion.\ndistinctly different from the\nThis mechanism appears\n\"Actron\" flowfield, although both\nindeed result in enhanced dispersion characteristics.\n3.\nI would suggest that BEW consider a refinement of the\nassociated laboratory experiment designs to generate discriminating\ndata. One variable that has implicitly not been controlled is the\ninfluence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry. It is possible\nthat acoustic pressure reflections off the chamber walls might exert\ncomCO . 3601A Chapman Highway . Isnoxville, TN 37920 . Phone: (615) 577-5494\n501102013\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nmcj0037\n\nQuestion: How many distinct mechanisms appear to play a role in the breakup of a smoke column into a multi-dimensional flowfield?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "At least two",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
438
|
One variable that has implicitly not been controlled?
|
influence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry.
|
Page 1
. ' . . -7
In 22. BY
* se , up
MEMORANDUM
TO :
From :
Mr. R. Rugh Honeycutt
Subject:
A. J. Baker
The Aerodynamics of Swirl
Date:
October 1, 1984
SUMMARY
The conference on "smoke swirl," held at BAW Headquarters,
brought together various elements of the BAT organization with the
goal of cummunication of results associated with experimentation on
directed velocity systems with filter designs. This brief report
documents impressions gained by the writer on the broad issue.
DISCUSSION
1.
The results presented by the Southhampton and Hamburg groups
on directed smoke jets verify the ability of filter design to position
the interaction of smoke jet columns at various locations within the
oral cavity.
The data on the desirability of one specific
configuration in comparison to alternatives was less conclusive.
Clearly, rather comprehensive testing matrices with smoker panels will
be required to determine the relative efficiency of specific designs.
2. Prior to commission of the financial resources to conduct
these tests and correlate the data, it appears desirable to conduct
definitive laboratory tests (and perhaps, theoretical fluid dynamics
analyses) to isolate exact cause and effect relations of filter
design. Specifically, the use of the word "swirl" to characterize
all flows that are not unidirectional,
oversimplification.
is probably an
At least two distinct mechanisms appear to play
a role in the breakup of a smoke column into a multi-dimensional
flowfield. Specifically, the multiple jet geometry of an Actron-type
design appears to generate a vortex flowfield that in a steady-flow
manner can rapidly disperse the smoke column. Alternatively, as a
function of smoke column preconditioning by a filter (or tobacco rod),
the data presented by kelly St. Charles (BW) and Martin Duke
(Southampton )
for a single column system, seemed to confirm existence
of a time-varying unsteadiness in smake column stability which results
in breakup and multi-dimensional dispersion.
distinctly different from the
This mechanism appears
"Actron" flowfield, although both
indeed result in enhanced dispersion characteristics.
3.
I would suggest that BEW consider a refinement of the
associated laboratory experiment designs to generate discriminating
data. One variable that has implicitly not been controlled is the
influence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry. It is possible
that acoustic pressure reflections off the chamber walls might exert
comCO . 3601A Chapman Highway . Isnoxville, TN 37920 . Phone: (615) 577-5494
501102013
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nmcj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 303,
"image": "nmcj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "nmcj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 606
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\n. ' . . -7\nIn 22. BY\n* se , up\nMEMORANDUM\nTO :\nFrom :\nMr. R. Rugh Honeycutt\nSubject:\nA. J. Baker\nThe Aerodynamics of Swirl\nDate:\nOctober 1, 1984\nSUMMARY\nThe conference on \"smoke swirl,\" held at BAW Headquarters,\nbrought together various elements of the BAT organization with the\ngoal of cummunication of results associated with experimentation on\ndirected velocity systems with filter designs. This brief report\ndocuments impressions gained by the writer on the broad issue.\nDISCUSSION\n1.\nThe results presented by the Southhampton and Hamburg groups\non directed smoke jets verify the ability of filter design to position\nthe interaction of smoke jet columns at various locations within the\noral cavity.\nThe data on the desirability of one specific\nconfiguration in comparison to alternatives was less conclusive.\nClearly, rather comprehensive testing matrices with smoker panels will\nbe required to determine the relative efficiency of specific designs.\n2. Prior to commission of the financial resources to conduct\nthese tests and correlate the data, it appears desirable to conduct\ndefinitive laboratory tests (and perhaps, theoretical fluid dynamics\nanalyses) to isolate exact cause and effect relations of filter\ndesign. Specifically, the use of the word \"swirl\" to characterize\nall flows that are not unidirectional,\noversimplification.\nis probably an\nAt least two distinct mechanisms appear to play\na role in the breakup of a smoke column into a multi-dimensional\nflowfield. Specifically, the multiple jet geometry of an Actron-type\ndesign appears to generate a vortex flowfield that in a steady-flow\nmanner can rapidly disperse the smoke column. Alternatively, as a\nfunction of smoke column preconditioning by a filter (or tobacco rod),\nthe data presented by kelly St. Charles (BW) and Martin Duke\n(Southampton )\nfor a single column system, seemed to confirm existence\nof a time-varying unsteadiness in smake column stability which results\nin breakup and multi-dimensional dispersion.\ndistinctly different from the\nThis mechanism appears\n\"Actron\" flowfield, although both\nindeed result in enhanced dispersion characteristics.\n3.\nI would suggest that BEW consider a refinement of the\nassociated laboratory experiment designs to generate discriminating\ndata. One variable that has implicitly not been controlled is the\ninfluence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry. It is possible\nthat acoustic pressure reflections off the chamber walls might exert\ncomCO . 3601A Chapman Highway . Isnoxville, TN 37920 . Phone: (615) 577-5494\n501102013\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nmcj0037\n\nQuestion: One variable that has implicitly not been controlled?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "influence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry.",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
442
|
What is the full form of PUF?
|
POLYURETHANE FOAM
|
Page 2
with modifier was necessary for the polyimide sorbents due to the stronger intermolecular
forces. M. Krieger (Indiana University) and S. Hawthorne (University of N. Dakota)
experimented with polyurethane foam (PUF) with SFE in quantitatively recovering wide
varieties of organic compounds. These included semi-volatiles, phenols, aromatics, and
PAH's. A PUF sampling of air in a smoker's office and followed by SFE-GC (S. Hawthorne)
showed the presence of phenols, nicotine and fatty acids. PUF and SFE-GC were also
demonstrated in quantitative measurements of phenolics in woodsmoke analysis. W. T.
Foreman (U.S. Geological Survey, CO) extracted the C, , cartridge with SFE to recover
pesticides in high yield.
DETERMINATION OF POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS (PVOC) IN AMBIENT AIR
The polar compounds are those containing hetero-atoms such as nitrogen, sulfur and
oxygen. The single most difficult problem in developing protocols for analyzing polar
compounds at trace level in air is probably moisture. Sampling of sidestream smoke
components shared similar difficulty. The moisture in the ambient air clogged up the cryogenic
trap and prevented sample enrichment. The evaporation of water vapor in the source of the
mass spectrometer interfered with the high vacuum and the detection of co-eluting compounds.
The present EPA TO-14 method requires the use of Naphion dryer to eliminate water.
Unfortunately, the Naphion tube is also permeable to many polar compounds such carbonyls
and alcohols. Method TO-14 with canister sampling is only for nonpolar organic compounds,
e.g. aromatics and hydrocarbons.
J. Pleil (U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC) summarized the research activity in
PVOC. Two developments are worth mentioning here. A SUMMA passivated canister, which
replaced sampling bags in air sampling, was evaluated for its stability towards PVOC by using
a standard mixture consisting acetonitrile, methanol, acetone, acrylnitrile, butanal, isopropanol,
methyl ethyl ketone, ethyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate. Wide variation of the data (2 -
70% RSD) in the subsequent analysis over several weeks indicated the presence of residual
activity from the canister's metal surface. Another approach to overcome the moisture problem
is to eliminate the sampling step altogether by using real-time detection. Ion trap mass
spectrometer (ITMS) is being evaluated as a dynamic detection and identification system.
Atmospheric pressure inlet and glow discharge ionization (API/GD) is being investigated by
EPA for air sample introduction into ITMS. Another inlet system using a direct sniffer probe
fitted with a needle valve was reported by D. Berberich (Monsanto Company). Both systems
showed low ppb sensitivity (1 - 60 ppb) and the ITMS provided mass scanning and ms/ms
capability for identification of unknown.
NICOTINE. IN ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE
D. J. Eatough (Brigham Young University) presented the results on cabin air quality
study in commercial aircraft. Future study was halted when the smoking ban became effective
in January of this year. This study was conducted in a DC-10 aircraft with the following
objectives (1) to quantify concentrations of ETS species; (2) to identify the factors
-2-
2022155945
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 312,
"image": "qhxj0037_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "qhxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 807
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nwith modifier was necessary for the polyimide sorbents due to the stronger intermolecular\nforces. M. Krieger (Indiana University) and S. Hawthorne (University of N. Dakota)\nexperimented with polyurethane foam (PUF) with SFE in quantitatively recovering wide\nvarieties of organic compounds. These included semi-volatiles, phenols, aromatics, and\nPAH's. A PUF sampling of air in a smoker's office and followed by SFE-GC (S. Hawthorne)\nshowed the presence of phenols, nicotine and fatty acids. PUF and SFE-GC were also\ndemonstrated in quantitative measurements of phenolics in woodsmoke analysis. W. T.\nForeman (U.S. Geological Survey, CO) extracted the C, , cartridge with SFE to recover\npesticides in high yield.\nDETERMINATION OF POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS (PVOC) IN AMBIENT AIR\nThe polar compounds are those containing hetero-atoms such as nitrogen, sulfur and\noxygen. The single most difficult problem in developing protocols for analyzing polar\ncompounds at trace level in air is probably moisture. Sampling of sidestream smoke\ncomponents shared similar difficulty. The moisture in the ambient air clogged up the cryogenic\ntrap and prevented sample enrichment. The evaporation of water vapor in the source of the\nmass spectrometer interfered with the high vacuum and the detection of co-eluting compounds.\nThe present EPA TO-14 method requires the use of Naphion dryer to eliminate water.\nUnfortunately, the Naphion tube is also permeable to many polar compounds such carbonyls\nand alcohols. Method TO-14 with canister sampling is only for nonpolar organic compounds,\ne.g. aromatics and hydrocarbons.\nJ. Pleil (U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC) summarized the research activity in\nPVOC. Two developments are worth mentioning here. A SUMMA passivated canister, which\nreplaced sampling bags in air sampling, was evaluated for its stability towards PVOC by using\na standard mixture consisting acetonitrile, methanol, acetone, acrylnitrile, butanal, isopropanol,\nmethyl ethyl ketone, ethyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate. Wide variation of the data (2 -\n70% RSD) in the subsequent analysis over several weeks indicated the presence of residual\nactivity from the canister's metal surface. Another approach to overcome the moisture problem\nis to eliminate the sampling step altogether by using real-time detection. Ion trap mass\nspectrometer (ITMS) is being evaluated as a dynamic detection and identification system.\nAtmospheric pressure inlet and glow discharge ionization (API/GD) is being investigated by\nEPA for air sample introduction into ITMS. Another inlet system using a direct sniffer probe\nfitted with a needle valve was reported by D. Berberich (Monsanto Company). Both systems\nshowed low ppb sensitivity (1 - 60 ppb) and the ITMS provided mass scanning and ms/ms\ncapability for identification of unknown.\nNICOTINE. IN ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE\nD. J. Eatough (Brigham Young University) presented the results on cabin air quality\nstudy in commercial aircraft. Future study was halted when the smoking ban became effective\nin January of this year. This study was conducted in a DC-10 aircraft with the following\nobjectives (1) to quantify concentrations of ETS species; (2) to identify the factors\n-2-\n2022155945\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the full form of PUF?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "POLYURETHANE FOAM",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
443
|
Which hetero-atoms does polar compounds contain?
|
nitrogen, sulfur and oxygen.
|
Page 2
with modifier was necessary for the polyimide sorbents due to the stronger intermolecular
forces. M. Krieger (Indiana University) and S. Hawthorne (University of N. Dakota)
experimented with polyurethane foam (PUF) with SFE in quantitatively recovering wide
varieties of organic compounds. These included semi-volatiles, phenols, aromatics, and
PAH's. A PUF sampling of air in a smoker's office and followed by SFE-GC (S. Hawthorne)
showed the presence of phenols, nicotine and fatty acids. PUF and SFE-GC were also
demonstrated in quantitative measurements of phenolics in woodsmoke analysis. W. T.
Foreman (U.S. Geological Survey, CO) extracted the C, , cartridge with SFE to recover
pesticides in high yield.
DETERMINATION OF POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS (PVOC) IN AMBIENT AIR
The polar compounds are those containing hetero-atoms such as nitrogen, sulfur and
oxygen. The single most difficult problem in developing protocols for analyzing polar
compounds at trace level in air is probably moisture. Sampling of sidestream smoke
components shared similar difficulty. The moisture in the ambient air clogged up the cryogenic
trap and prevented sample enrichment. The evaporation of water vapor in the source of the
mass spectrometer interfered with the high vacuum and the detection of co-eluting compounds.
The present EPA TO-14 method requires the use of Naphion dryer to eliminate water.
Unfortunately, the Naphion tube is also permeable to many polar compounds such carbonyls
and alcohols. Method TO-14 with canister sampling is only for nonpolar organic compounds,
e.g. aromatics and hydrocarbons.
J. Pleil (U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC) summarized the research activity in
PVOC. Two developments are worth mentioning here. A SUMMA passivated canister, which
replaced sampling bags in air sampling, was evaluated for its stability towards PVOC by using
a standard mixture consisting acetonitrile, methanol, acetone, acrylnitrile, butanal, isopropanol,
methyl ethyl ketone, ethyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate. Wide variation of the data (2 -
70% RSD) in the subsequent analysis over several weeks indicated the presence of residual
activity from the canister's metal surface. Another approach to overcome the moisture problem
is to eliminate the sampling step altogether by using real-time detection. Ion trap mass
spectrometer (ITMS) is being evaluated as a dynamic detection and identification system.
Atmospheric pressure inlet and glow discharge ionization (API/GD) is being investigated by
EPA for air sample introduction into ITMS. Another inlet system using a direct sniffer probe
fitted with a needle valve was reported by D. Berberich (Monsanto Company). Both systems
showed low ppb sensitivity (1 - 60 ppb) and the ITMS provided mass scanning and ms/ms
capability for identification of unknown.
NICOTINE. IN ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE
D. J. Eatough (Brigham Young University) presented the results on cabin air quality
study in commercial aircraft. Future study was halted when the smoking ban became effective
in January of this year. This study was conducted in a DC-10 aircraft with the following
objectives (1) to quantify concentrations of ETS species; (2) to identify the factors
-2-
2022155945
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 312,
"image": "qhxj0037_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "qhxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 809
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nwith modifier was necessary for the polyimide sorbents due to the stronger intermolecular\nforces. M. Krieger (Indiana University) and S. Hawthorne (University of N. Dakota)\nexperimented with polyurethane foam (PUF) with SFE in quantitatively recovering wide\nvarieties of organic compounds. These included semi-volatiles, phenols, aromatics, and\nPAH's. A PUF sampling of air in a smoker's office and followed by SFE-GC (S. Hawthorne)\nshowed the presence of phenols, nicotine and fatty acids. PUF and SFE-GC were also\ndemonstrated in quantitative measurements of phenolics in woodsmoke analysis. W. T.\nForeman (U.S. Geological Survey, CO) extracted the C, , cartridge with SFE to recover\npesticides in high yield.\nDETERMINATION OF POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS (PVOC) IN AMBIENT AIR\nThe polar compounds are those containing hetero-atoms such as nitrogen, sulfur and\noxygen. The single most difficult problem in developing protocols for analyzing polar\ncompounds at trace level in air is probably moisture. Sampling of sidestream smoke\ncomponents shared similar difficulty. The moisture in the ambient air clogged up the cryogenic\ntrap and prevented sample enrichment. The evaporation of water vapor in the source of the\nmass spectrometer interfered with the high vacuum and the detection of co-eluting compounds.\nThe present EPA TO-14 method requires the use of Naphion dryer to eliminate water.\nUnfortunately, the Naphion tube is also permeable to many polar compounds such carbonyls\nand alcohols. Method TO-14 with canister sampling is only for nonpolar organic compounds,\ne.g. aromatics and hydrocarbons.\nJ. Pleil (U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC) summarized the research activity in\nPVOC. Two developments are worth mentioning here. A SUMMA passivated canister, which\nreplaced sampling bags in air sampling, was evaluated for its stability towards PVOC by using\na standard mixture consisting acetonitrile, methanol, acetone, acrylnitrile, butanal, isopropanol,\nmethyl ethyl ketone, ethyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate. Wide variation of the data (2 -\n70% RSD) in the subsequent analysis over several weeks indicated the presence of residual\nactivity from the canister's metal surface. Another approach to overcome the moisture problem\nis to eliminate the sampling step altogether by using real-time detection. Ion trap mass\nspectrometer (ITMS) is being evaluated as a dynamic detection and identification system.\nAtmospheric pressure inlet and glow discharge ionization (API/GD) is being investigated by\nEPA for air sample introduction into ITMS. Another inlet system using a direct sniffer probe\nfitted with a needle valve was reported by D. Berberich (Monsanto Company). Both systems\nshowed low ppb sensitivity (1 - 60 ppb) and the ITMS provided mass scanning and ms/ms\ncapability for identification of unknown.\nNICOTINE. IN ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE\nD. J. Eatough (Brigham Young University) presented the results on cabin air quality\nstudy in commercial aircraft. Future study was halted when the smoking ban became effective\nin January of this year. This study was conducted in a DC-10 aircraft with the following\nobjectives (1) to quantify concentrations of ETS species; (2) to identify the factors\n-2-\n2022155945\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037\n\nQuestion: Which hetero-atoms does polar compounds contain?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "nitrogen, sulfur and oxygen.",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
446
|
What is the full form of POVC?
|
POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS
|
Page 2
with modifier was necessary for the polyimide sorbents due to the stronger intermolecular
forces. M. Krieger (Indiana University) and S. Hawthorne (University of N. Dakota)
experimented with polyurethane foam (PUF) with SFE in quantitatively recovering wide
varieties of organic compounds. These included semi-volatiles, phenols, aromatics, and
PAH's. A PUF sampling of air in a smoker's office and followed by SFE-GC (S. Hawthorne)
showed the presence of phenols, nicotine and fatty acids. PUF and SFE-GC were also
demonstrated in quantitative measurements of phenolics in woodsmoke analysis. W. T.
Foreman (U.S. Geological Survey, CO) extracted the C, , cartridge with SFE to recover
pesticides in high yield.
DETERMINATION OF POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS (PVOC) IN AMBIENT AIR
The polar compounds are those containing hetero-atoms such as nitrogen, sulfur and
oxygen. The single most difficult problem in developing protocols for analyzing polar
compounds at trace level in air is probably moisture. Sampling of sidestream smoke
components shared similar difficulty. The moisture in the ambient air clogged up the cryogenic
trap and prevented sample enrichment. The evaporation of water vapor in the source of the
mass spectrometer interfered with the high vacuum and the detection of co-eluting compounds.
The present EPA TO-14 method requires the use of Naphion dryer to eliminate water.
Unfortunately, the Naphion tube is also permeable to many polar compounds such carbonyls
and alcohols. Method TO-14 with canister sampling is only for nonpolar organic compounds,
e.g. aromatics and hydrocarbons.
J. Pleil (U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC) summarized the research activity in
PVOC. Two developments are worth mentioning here. A SUMMA passivated canister, which
replaced sampling bags in air sampling, was evaluated for its stability towards PVOC by using
a standard mixture consisting acetonitrile, methanol, acetone, acrylnitrile, butanal, isopropanol,
methyl ethyl ketone, ethyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate. Wide variation of the data (2 -
70% RSD) in the subsequent analysis over several weeks indicated the presence of residual
activity from the canister's metal surface. Another approach to overcome the moisture problem
is to eliminate the sampling step altogether by using real-time detection. Ion trap mass
spectrometer (ITMS) is being evaluated as a dynamic detection and identification system.
Atmospheric pressure inlet and glow discharge ionization (API/GD) is being investigated by
EPA for air sample introduction into ITMS. Another inlet system using a direct sniffer probe
fitted with a needle valve was reported by D. Berberich (Monsanto Company). Both systems
showed low ppb sensitivity (1 - 60 ppb) and the ITMS provided mass scanning and ms/ms
capability for identification of unknown.
NICOTINE. IN ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE
D. J. Eatough (Brigham Young University) presented the results on cabin air quality
study in commercial aircraft. Future study was halted when the smoking ban became effective
in January of this year. This study was conducted in a DC-10 aircraft with the following
objectives (1) to quantify concentrations of ETS species; (2) to identify the factors
-2-
2022155945
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 312,
"image": "qhxj0037_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "qhxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 808
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nwith modifier was necessary for the polyimide sorbents due to the stronger intermolecular\nforces. M. Krieger (Indiana University) and S. Hawthorne (University of N. Dakota)\nexperimented with polyurethane foam (PUF) with SFE in quantitatively recovering wide\nvarieties of organic compounds. These included semi-volatiles, phenols, aromatics, and\nPAH's. A PUF sampling of air in a smoker's office and followed by SFE-GC (S. Hawthorne)\nshowed the presence of phenols, nicotine and fatty acids. PUF and SFE-GC were also\ndemonstrated in quantitative measurements of phenolics in woodsmoke analysis. W. T.\nForeman (U.S. Geological Survey, CO) extracted the C, , cartridge with SFE to recover\npesticides in high yield.\nDETERMINATION OF POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS (PVOC) IN AMBIENT AIR\nThe polar compounds are those containing hetero-atoms such as nitrogen, sulfur and\noxygen. The single most difficult problem in developing protocols for analyzing polar\ncompounds at trace level in air is probably moisture. Sampling of sidestream smoke\ncomponents shared similar difficulty. The moisture in the ambient air clogged up the cryogenic\ntrap and prevented sample enrichment. The evaporation of water vapor in the source of the\nmass spectrometer interfered with the high vacuum and the detection of co-eluting compounds.\nThe present EPA TO-14 method requires the use of Naphion dryer to eliminate water.\nUnfortunately, the Naphion tube is also permeable to many polar compounds such carbonyls\nand alcohols. Method TO-14 with canister sampling is only for nonpolar organic compounds,\ne.g. aromatics and hydrocarbons.\nJ. Pleil (U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC) summarized the research activity in\nPVOC. Two developments are worth mentioning here. A SUMMA passivated canister, which\nreplaced sampling bags in air sampling, was evaluated for its stability towards PVOC by using\na standard mixture consisting acetonitrile, methanol, acetone, acrylnitrile, butanal, isopropanol,\nmethyl ethyl ketone, ethyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate. Wide variation of the data (2 -\n70% RSD) in the subsequent analysis over several weeks indicated the presence of residual\nactivity from the canister's metal surface. Another approach to overcome the moisture problem\nis to eliminate the sampling step altogether by using real-time detection. Ion trap mass\nspectrometer (ITMS) is being evaluated as a dynamic detection and identification system.\nAtmospheric pressure inlet and glow discharge ionization (API/GD) is being investigated by\nEPA for air sample introduction into ITMS. Another inlet system using a direct sniffer probe\nfitted with a needle valve was reported by D. Berberich (Monsanto Company). Both systems\nshowed low ppb sensitivity (1 - 60 ppb) and the ITMS provided mass scanning and ms/ms\ncapability for identification of unknown.\nNICOTINE. IN ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE\nD. J. Eatough (Brigham Young University) presented the results on cabin air quality\nstudy in commercial aircraft. Future study was halted when the smoking ban became effective\nin January of this year. This study was conducted in a DC-10 aircraft with the following\nobjectives (1) to quantify concentrations of ETS species; (2) to identify the factors\n-2-\n2022155945\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the full form of POVC?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
447
|
Who presented the results on cabin air quality study in commercial aircraft?
|
D. J. EATOUGH
|
Page 2
with modifier was necessary for the polyimide sorbents due to the stronger intermolecular
forces. M. Krieger (Indiana University) and S. Hawthorne (University of N. Dakota)
experimented with polyurethane foam (PUF) with SFE in quantitatively recovering wide
varieties of organic compounds. These included semi-volatiles, phenols, aromatics, and
PAH's. A PUF sampling of air in a smoker's office and followed by SFE-GC (S. Hawthorne)
showed the presence of phenols, nicotine and fatty acids. PUF and SFE-GC were also
demonstrated in quantitative measurements of phenolics in woodsmoke analysis. W. T.
Foreman (U.S. Geological Survey, CO) extracted the C, , cartridge with SFE to recover
pesticides in high yield.
DETERMINATION OF POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS (PVOC) IN AMBIENT AIR
The polar compounds are those containing hetero-atoms such as nitrogen, sulfur and
oxygen. The single most difficult problem in developing protocols for analyzing polar
compounds at trace level in air is probably moisture. Sampling of sidestream smoke
components shared similar difficulty. The moisture in the ambient air clogged up the cryogenic
trap and prevented sample enrichment. The evaporation of water vapor in the source of the
mass spectrometer interfered with the high vacuum and the detection of co-eluting compounds.
The present EPA TO-14 method requires the use of Naphion dryer to eliminate water.
Unfortunately, the Naphion tube is also permeable to many polar compounds such carbonyls
and alcohols. Method TO-14 with canister sampling is only for nonpolar organic compounds,
e.g. aromatics and hydrocarbons.
J. Pleil (U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC) summarized the research activity in
PVOC. Two developments are worth mentioning here. A SUMMA passivated canister, which
replaced sampling bags in air sampling, was evaluated for its stability towards PVOC by using
a standard mixture consisting acetonitrile, methanol, acetone, acrylnitrile, butanal, isopropanol,
methyl ethyl ketone, ethyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate. Wide variation of the data (2 -
70% RSD) in the subsequent analysis over several weeks indicated the presence of residual
activity from the canister's metal surface. Another approach to overcome the moisture problem
is to eliminate the sampling step altogether by using real-time detection. Ion trap mass
spectrometer (ITMS) is being evaluated as a dynamic detection and identification system.
Atmospheric pressure inlet and glow discharge ionization (API/GD) is being investigated by
EPA for air sample introduction into ITMS. Another inlet system using a direct sniffer probe
fitted with a needle valve was reported by D. Berberich (Monsanto Company). Both systems
showed low ppb sensitivity (1 - 60 ppb) and the ITMS provided mass scanning and ms/ms
capability for identification of unknown.
NICOTINE. IN ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE
D. J. Eatough (Brigham Young University) presented the results on cabin air quality
study in commercial aircraft. Future study was halted when the smoking ban became effective
in January of this year. This study was conducted in a DC-10 aircraft with the following
objectives (1) to quantify concentrations of ETS species; (2) to identify the factors
-2-
2022155945
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 312,
"image": "qhxj0037_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "qhxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 811
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nwith modifier was necessary for the polyimide sorbents due to the stronger intermolecular\nforces. M. Krieger (Indiana University) and S. Hawthorne (University of N. Dakota)\nexperimented with polyurethane foam (PUF) with SFE in quantitatively recovering wide\nvarieties of organic compounds. These included semi-volatiles, phenols, aromatics, and\nPAH's. A PUF sampling of air in a smoker's office and followed by SFE-GC (S. Hawthorne)\nshowed the presence of phenols, nicotine and fatty acids. PUF and SFE-GC were also\ndemonstrated in quantitative measurements of phenolics in woodsmoke analysis. W. T.\nForeman (U.S. Geological Survey, CO) extracted the C, , cartridge with SFE to recover\npesticides in high yield.\nDETERMINATION OF POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS (PVOC) IN AMBIENT AIR\nThe polar compounds are those containing hetero-atoms such as nitrogen, sulfur and\noxygen. The single most difficult problem in developing protocols for analyzing polar\ncompounds at trace level in air is probably moisture. Sampling of sidestream smoke\ncomponents shared similar difficulty. The moisture in the ambient air clogged up the cryogenic\ntrap and prevented sample enrichment. The evaporation of water vapor in the source of the\nmass spectrometer interfered with the high vacuum and the detection of co-eluting compounds.\nThe present EPA TO-14 method requires the use of Naphion dryer to eliminate water.\nUnfortunately, the Naphion tube is also permeable to many polar compounds such carbonyls\nand alcohols. Method TO-14 with canister sampling is only for nonpolar organic compounds,\ne.g. aromatics and hydrocarbons.\nJ. Pleil (U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC) summarized the research activity in\nPVOC. Two developments are worth mentioning here. A SUMMA passivated canister, which\nreplaced sampling bags in air sampling, was evaluated for its stability towards PVOC by using\na standard mixture consisting acetonitrile, methanol, acetone, acrylnitrile, butanal, isopropanol,\nmethyl ethyl ketone, ethyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate. Wide variation of the data (2 -\n70% RSD) in the subsequent analysis over several weeks indicated the presence of residual\nactivity from the canister's metal surface. Another approach to overcome the moisture problem\nis to eliminate the sampling step altogether by using real-time detection. Ion trap mass\nspectrometer (ITMS) is being evaluated as a dynamic detection and identification system.\nAtmospheric pressure inlet and glow discharge ionization (API/GD) is being investigated by\nEPA for air sample introduction into ITMS. Another inlet system using a direct sniffer probe\nfitted with a needle valve was reported by D. Berberich (Monsanto Company). Both systems\nshowed low ppb sensitivity (1 - 60 ppb) and the ITMS provided mass scanning and ms/ms\ncapability for identification of unknown.\nNICOTINE. IN ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE\nD. J. Eatough (Brigham Young University) presented the results on cabin air quality\nstudy in commercial aircraft. Future study was halted when the smoking ban became effective\nin January of this year. This study was conducted in a DC-10 aircraft with the following\nobjectives (1) to quantify concentrations of ETS species; (2) to identify the factors\n-2-\n2022155945\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037\n\nQuestion: Who presented the results on cabin air quality study in commercial aircraft?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "D. J. EATOUGH",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
453
|
What is the slope mentioned in the first table?
|
0.1088102E+01
|
Page 9
WINSTON LT, G725 WITH 18 TURKISH EXTRACT/5$8-9/100/05-12-92
SET # 14 ;259-279
DOSE-ug
PLATE COUNTS
MEAN S. D.
0 . 0000
150. 164. 174.
162.7
12. 1
25 .0000
157. 181. 186.
174.7
15.5
50 . 0000
181. 191. 191.
187.7
5 .8
75.0000
224. 224. 244.
230.7
11.5
100 . 0000
256. 261. 252.
256.3
4.5
125.0000
297. 316. 299.
304.0 10.4
250.0000
382. 359 . 388.
376.3 15.3
SLOPE= 0. 1088102E+01
1088 Rusing the
6 disse
CONTROL WINSTON LT, LOW EXI G7 SHEET/5:$-9/100/05-12-92
SET # 15 ;280-300
DOSE-ug
PLATE COUNTS
MEAN S. D.
0.0000
145. 152. 149.
148.7
3.5
25.0000
174. 154. 160
162.7
10.3
50.000
187. 196. 202.
195.0
7 .5
75 . 0000
202. 219. 215.
212.0
8.9
100 . 0000
205. 218. 241.
221.3
18.2
125 . 0000
267. 275. 276.
272.7
4.9
250 . 0000
306. 274. 312.
297.3 20.4
SLOPE= 0. 9183201E+00
918 Reims for
ledoges
WINSTON LT, LOW EXT G7 WITH 0.5% TURKISH EXT/5 8-9/100/05-12-92
SET # 1 ; 301-321
DOSE-ug
PLATE COUNTS
MEAN S.D.
0. 0000
135. 127. 148.
136.7
10. 6
25.0000
155. 155. 170.
160.0
8 . 7
50. 0000
190. 190. 164.
181.3 15.0
75 . 0000
183. 202. 193
192.7
9.5
100 .0000
226. 263. 250.
246.3
18.8
125 .0000
293. 276. 271.
280.0
11.5
250 . 0000
337. 399. 380.
372.0
31.8
SLOPE= 0. 1094010E+01
10 94 Revimp for
51003 0975
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgb10037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 313,
"image": "hgbl0037_9.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "hgbl0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "9"
}
| 741
|
none
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 9\nWINSTON LT, G725 WITH 18 TURKISH EXTRACT/5$8-9/100/05-12-92\nSET # 14 ;259-279\nDOSE-ug\nPLATE COUNTS\nMEAN S. D.\n0 . 0000\n150. 164. 174.\n162.7\n12. 1\n25 .0000\n157. 181. 186.\n174.7\n15.5\n50 . 0000\n181. 191. 191.\n187.7\n5 .8\n75.0000\n224. 224. 244.\n230.7\n11.5\n100 . 0000\n256. 261. 252.\n256.3\n4.5\n125.0000\n297. 316. 299.\n304.0 10.4\n250.0000\n382. 359 . 388.\n376.3 15.3\nSLOPE= 0. 1088102E+01\n1088 Rusing the\n6 disse\nCONTROL WINSTON LT, LOW EXI G7 SHEET/5:$-9/100/05-12-92\nSET # 15 ;280-300\nDOSE-ug\nPLATE COUNTS\nMEAN S. D.\n0.0000\n145. 152. 149.\n148.7\n3.5\n25.0000\n174. 154. 160\n162.7\n10.3\n50.000\n187. 196. 202.\n195.0\n7 .5\n75 . 0000\n202. 219. 215.\n212.0\n8.9\n100 . 0000\n205. 218. 241.\n221.3\n18.2\n125 . 0000\n267. 275. 276.\n272.7\n4.9\n250 . 0000\n306. 274. 312.\n297.3 20.4\nSLOPE= 0. 9183201E+00\n918 Reims for\nledoges\nWINSTON LT, LOW EXT G7 WITH 0.5% TURKISH EXT/5 8-9/100/05-12-92\nSET # 1 ; 301-321\nDOSE-ug\nPLATE COUNTS\nMEAN S.D.\n0. 0000\n135. 127. 148.\n136.7\n10. 6\n25.0000\n155. 155. 170.\n160.0\n8 . 7\n50. 0000\n190. 190. 164.\n181.3 15.0\n75 . 0000\n183. 202. 193\n192.7\n9.5\n100 .0000\n226. 263. 250.\n246.3\n18.8\n125 .0000\n293. 276. 271.\n280.0\n11.5\n250 . 0000\n337. 399. 380.\n372.0\n31.8\nSLOPE= 0. 1094010E+01\n10 94 Revimp for\n51003 0975\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgb10037\n\nQuestion: What is the slope mentioned in the first table?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0.1088102E+01",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
455
|
What is the date mentioned in the second table?
|
05-12-92
|
Page 9
WINSTON LT, G725 WITH 18 TURKISH EXTRACT/5$8-9/100/05-12-92
SET # 14 ;259-279
DOSE-ug
PLATE COUNTS
MEAN S. D.
0 . 0000
150. 164. 174.
162.7
12. 1
25 .0000
157. 181. 186.
174.7
15.5
50 . 0000
181. 191. 191.
187.7
5 .8
75.0000
224. 224. 244.
230.7
11.5
100 . 0000
256. 261. 252.
256.3
4.5
125.0000
297. 316. 299.
304.0 10.4
250.0000
382. 359 . 388.
376.3 15.3
SLOPE= 0. 1088102E+01
1088 Rusing the
6 disse
CONTROL WINSTON LT, LOW EXI G7 SHEET/5:$-9/100/05-12-92
SET # 15 ;280-300
DOSE-ug
PLATE COUNTS
MEAN S. D.
0.0000
145. 152. 149.
148.7
3.5
25.0000
174. 154. 160
162.7
10.3
50.000
187. 196. 202.
195.0
7 .5
75 . 0000
202. 219. 215.
212.0
8.9
100 . 0000
205. 218. 241.
221.3
18.2
125 . 0000
267. 275. 276.
272.7
4.9
250 . 0000
306. 274. 312.
297.3 20.4
SLOPE= 0. 9183201E+00
918 Reims for
ledoges
WINSTON LT, LOW EXT G7 WITH 0.5% TURKISH EXT/5 8-9/100/05-12-92
SET # 1 ; 301-321
DOSE-ug
PLATE COUNTS
MEAN S.D.
0. 0000
135. 127. 148.
136.7
10. 6
25.0000
155. 155. 170.
160.0
8 . 7
50. 0000
190. 190. 164.
181.3 15.0
75 . 0000
183. 202. 193
192.7
9.5
100 .0000
226. 263. 250.
246.3
18.8
125 .0000
293. 276. 271.
280.0
11.5
250 . 0000
337. 399. 380.
372.0
31.8
SLOPE= 0. 1094010E+01
10 94 Revimp for
51003 0975
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgb10037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 313,
"image": "hgbl0037_9.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "hgbl0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "9"
}
| 738
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 9\nWINSTON LT, G725 WITH 18 TURKISH EXTRACT/5$8-9/100/05-12-92\nSET # 14 ;259-279\nDOSE-ug\nPLATE COUNTS\nMEAN S. D.\n0 . 0000\n150. 164. 174.\n162.7\n12. 1\n25 .0000\n157. 181. 186.\n174.7\n15.5\n50 . 0000\n181. 191. 191.\n187.7\n5 .8\n75.0000\n224. 224. 244.\n230.7\n11.5\n100 . 0000\n256. 261. 252.\n256.3\n4.5\n125.0000\n297. 316. 299.\n304.0 10.4\n250.0000\n382. 359 . 388.\n376.3 15.3\nSLOPE= 0. 1088102E+01\n1088 Rusing the\n6 disse\nCONTROL WINSTON LT, LOW EXI G7 SHEET/5:$-9/100/05-12-92\nSET # 15 ;280-300\nDOSE-ug\nPLATE COUNTS\nMEAN S. D.\n0.0000\n145. 152. 149.\n148.7\n3.5\n25.0000\n174. 154. 160\n162.7\n10.3\n50.000\n187. 196. 202.\n195.0\n7 .5\n75 . 0000\n202. 219. 215.\n212.0\n8.9\n100 . 0000\n205. 218. 241.\n221.3\n18.2\n125 . 0000\n267. 275. 276.\n272.7\n4.9\n250 . 0000\n306. 274. 312.\n297.3 20.4\nSLOPE= 0. 9183201E+00\n918 Reims for\nledoges\nWINSTON LT, LOW EXT G7 WITH 0.5% TURKISH EXT/5 8-9/100/05-12-92\nSET # 1 ; 301-321\nDOSE-ug\nPLATE COUNTS\nMEAN S.D.\n0. 0000\n135. 127. 148.\n136.7\n10. 6\n25.0000\n155. 155. 170.\n160.0\n8 . 7\n50. 0000\n190. 190. 164.\n181.3 15.0\n75 . 0000\n183. 202. 193\n192.7\n9.5\n100 .0000\n226. 263. 250.\n246.3\n18.8\n125 .0000\n293. 276. 271.\n280.0\n11.5\n250 . 0000\n337. 399. 380.\n372.0\n31.8\nSLOPE= 0. 1094010E+01\n10 94 Revimp for\n51003 0975\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgb10037\n\nQuestion: What is the date mentioned in the second table?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "05-12-92",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
456
|
What is the S.D. mentioned in the DOSE-ug 0.0000 in the third table?
|
10.6
|
Page 9
WINSTON LT, G725 WITH 18 TURKISH EXTRACT/5$8-9/100/05-12-92
SET # 14 ;259-279
DOSE-ug
PLATE COUNTS
MEAN S. D.
0 . 0000
150. 164. 174.
162.7
12. 1
25 .0000
157. 181. 186.
174.7
15.5
50 . 0000
181. 191. 191.
187.7
5 .8
75.0000
224. 224. 244.
230.7
11.5
100 . 0000
256. 261. 252.
256.3
4.5
125.0000
297. 316. 299.
304.0 10.4
250.0000
382. 359 . 388.
376.3 15.3
SLOPE= 0. 1088102E+01
1088 Rusing the
6 disse
CONTROL WINSTON LT, LOW EXI G7 SHEET/5:$-9/100/05-12-92
SET # 15 ;280-300
DOSE-ug
PLATE COUNTS
MEAN S. D.
0.0000
145. 152. 149.
148.7
3.5
25.0000
174. 154. 160
162.7
10.3
50.000
187. 196. 202.
195.0
7 .5
75 . 0000
202. 219. 215.
212.0
8.9
100 . 0000
205. 218. 241.
221.3
18.2
125 . 0000
267. 275. 276.
272.7
4.9
250 . 0000
306. 274. 312.
297.3 20.4
SLOPE= 0. 9183201E+00
918 Reims for
ledoges
WINSTON LT, LOW EXT G7 WITH 0.5% TURKISH EXT/5 8-9/100/05-12-92
SET # 1 ; 301-321
DOSE-ug
PLATE COUNTS
MEAN S.D.
0. 0000
135. 127. 148.
136.7
10. 6
25.0000
155. 155. 170.
160.0
8 . 7
50. 0000
190. 190. 164.
181.3 15.0
75 . 0000
183. 202. 193
192.7
9.5
100 .0000
226. 263. 250.
246.3
18.8
125 .0000
293. 276. 271.
280.0
11.5
250 . 0000
337. 399. 380.
372.0
31.8
SLOPE= 0. 1094010E+01
10 94 Revimp for
51003 0975
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgb10037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 313,
"image": "hgbl0037_9.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "hgbl0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "9"
}
| 749
|
none
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 9\nWINSTON LT, G725 WITH 18 TURKISH EXTRACT/5$8-9/100/05-12-92\nSET # 14 ;259-279\nDOSE-ug\nPLATE COUNTS\nMEAN S. D.\n0 . 0000\n150. 164. 174.\n162.7\n12. 1\n25 .0000\n157. 181. 186.\n174.7\n15.5\n50 . 0000\n181. 191. 191.\n187.7\n5 .8\n75.0000\n224. 224. 244.\n230.7\n11.5\n100 . 0000\n256. 261. 252.\n256.3\n4.5\n125.0000\n297. 316. 299.\n304.0 10.4\n250.0000\n382. 359 . 388.\n376.3 15.3\nSLOPE= 0. 1088102E+01\n1088 Rusing the\n6 disse\nCONTROL WINSTON LT, LOW EXI G7 SHEET/5:$-9/100/05-12-92\nSET # 15 ;280-300\nDOSE-ug\nPLATE COUNTS\nMEAN S. D.\n0.0000\n145. 152. 149.\n148.7\n3.5\n25.0000\n174. 154. 160\n162.7\n10.3\n50.000\n187. 196. 202.\n195.0\n7 .5\n75 . 0000\n202. 219. 215.\n212.0\n8.9\n100 . 0000\n205. 218. 241.\n221.3\n18.2\n125 . 0000\n267. 275. 276.\n272.7\n4.9\n250 . 0000\n306. 274. 312.\n297.3 20.4\nSLOPE= 0. 9183201E+00\n918 Reims for\nledoges\nWINSTON LT, LOW EXT G7 WITH 0.5% TURKISH EXT/5 8-9/100/05-12-92\nSET # 1 ; 301-321\nDOSE-ug\nPLATE COUNTS\nMEAN S.D.\n0. 0000\n135. 127. 148.\n136.7\n10. 6\n25.0000\n155. 155. 170.\n160.0\n8 . 7\n50. 0000\n190. 190. 164.\n181.3 15.0\n75 . 0000\n183. 202. 193\n192.7\n9.5\n100 .0000\n226. 263. 250.\n246.3\n18.8\n125 .0000\n293. 276. 271.\n280.0\n11.5\n250 . 0000\n337. 399. 380.\n372.0\n31.8\nSLOPE= 0. 1094010E+01\n10 94 Revimp for\n51003 0975\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgb10037\n\nQuestion: What is the S.D. mentioned in the DOSE-ug 0.0000 in the third table?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "10.6",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
460
|
Where were the two magnesium containing papers made at?
|
University of Maine
|
Page 2
The low sidestream panel smoked two magnesium containing papers made at the
University of Maine and found them to very dry. Additional papers will be made by Chemical
Research Division personnel with lower levels of filler.
The decision to utilize full circumference cigarettes with a single wrap of 45 g/m'
paper using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent for the Ambrosia II POL's will
mean that additional paper development work will be required for these lower basis weight
papers. The study with the highest priority will be to investigate the effect of malonic acid on
these papers. Results with 63g/m' papers suggest that it should be possible to increase
sidestream reduction from the current 55-60% range to the 65-70% range. The 091 base paper
will be coated in-house with various levels of mono potassium phosphate and malonic acid in
order to optimize the system. Also, it will be necessary to investigate the stability of Aromatek
245 on papers containing malonic acid. Work to improve the subjectives of models optimized
for sidestream reduction through the use of charcoal filters and the design of aftercut flavors
will also be carried out.
A series of hand-made cigarettes has been made from hand sheets with a basis weight of
30 g/m' , various ratios of Albacar calcium carbonate and titanium dioxide as the inorganic
filler, and sodium fumarate (0.8% to 1.5%) as the fluxing agent. All models containing
titanium dioxide gave increased sidestream visibility as compared to either a model with
calcium carbonate as the sole inorganic filler with sodium fumarate as the fluxing agent or to
the standard control cigarette (AFK). This experiment clearly indicates that neither the use of
titanium dioxide or sodium fumarate in Japanese cigarette wrappers plays any role in the
observed lower sidestream visibility for these cigarettes.
Hand sheets were made utilizing a 30% level of a high surface area magnesium
carbonate semihydrate made by the pyrolysis of magnesium ammonium carbonate. Cigarettes
made from these hand sheets using potassium succinate as the fluxing agent gave significant
sidestream reduction as well as an acceptable ash. More work will be done with this system.
A set of six hand sheets obtained from Ecusta containing Baymag A (Canadian
magnesite) as the inorganic filler was used for hand-made models. These sheets were part of
the matrix study. The sheets were made to two basis weights, 55 and 65 g/m' , and varied in
filer level (25-35%) and porosity (4.7 to 10.7 Coresta). Based upon inspection of the
sidestream reductions obtained, it would appear that porosity is the controlling variable.
Sidestream reductions varied inversely with porosity irrespective of the other two variables.
In order for us to make valid comparisons of our data with data obtained at Ecusta, a
study was completed wherein a series of five cigarettes which varied significantly in sidestream
visibility was evaluated in-house using the eight-port visibility instrument and at Ecusta using a
- 2 -
2022155887
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 315,
"image": "nhxj0037_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "nhxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 711
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nThe low sidestream panel smoked two magnesium containing papers made at the\nUniversity of Maine and found them to very dry. Additional papers will be made by Chemical\nResearch Division personnel with lower levels of filler.\nThe decision to utilize full circumference cigarettes with a single wrap of 45 g/m'\npaper using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent for the Ambrosia II POL's will\nmean that additional paper development work will be required for these lower basis weight\npapers. The study with the highest priority will be to investigate the effect of malonic acid on\nthese papers. Results with 63g/m' papers suggest that it should be possible to increase\nsidestream reduction from the current 55-60% range to the 65-70% range. The 091 base paper\nwill be coated in-house with various levels of mono potassium phosphate and malonic acid in\norder to optimize the system. Also, it will be necessary to investigate the stability of Aromatek\n245 on papers containing malonic acid. Work to improve the subjectives of models optimized\nfor sidestream reduction through the use of charcoal filters and the design of aftercut flavors\nwill also be carried out.\nA series of hand-made cigarettes has been made from hand sheets with a basis weight of\n30 g/m' , various ratios of Albacar calcium carbonate and titanium dioxide as the inorganic\nfiller, and sodium fumarate (0.8% to 1.5%) as the fluxing agent. All models containing\ntitanium dioxide gave increased sidestream visibility as compared to either a model with\ncalcium carbonate as the sole inorganic filler with sodium fumarate as the fluxing agent or to\nthe standard control cigarette (AFK). This experiment clearly indicates that neither the use of\ntitanium dioxide or sodium fumarate in Japanese cigarette wrappers plays any role in the\nobserved lower sidestream visibility for these cigarettes.\nHand sheets were made utilizing a 30% level of a high surface area magnesium\ncarbonate semihydrate made by the pyrolysis of magnesium ammonium carbonate. Cigarettes\nmade from these hand sheets using potassium succinate as the fluxing agent gave significant\nsidestream reduction as well as an acceptable ash. More work will be done with this system.\nA set of six hand sheets obtained from Ecusta containing Baymag A (Canadian\nmagnesite) as the inorganic filler was used for hand-made models. These sheets were part of\nthe matrix study. The sheets were made to two basis weights, 55 and 65 g/m' , and varied in\nfiler level (25-35%) and porosity (4.7 to 10.7 Coresta). Based upon inspection of the\nsidestream reductions obtained, it would appear that porosity is the controlling variable.\nSidestream reductions varied inversely with porosity irrespective of the other two variables.\nIn order for us to make valid comparisons of our data with data obtained at Ecusta, a\nstudy was completed wherein a series of five cigarettes which varied significantly in sidestream\nvisibility was evaluated in-house using the eight-port visibility instrument and at Ecusta using a\n- 2 -\n2022155887\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037\n\nQuestion: Where were the two magnesium containing papers made at?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "University of Maine",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
465
|
Which base paper will be coated in-house with various levels of mono potassium phosphate and malonic acid in order to optimize the system?
|
091
|
Page 2
The low sidestream panel smoked two magnesium containing papers made at the
University of Maine and found them to very dry. Additional papers will be made by Chemical
Research Division personnel with lower levels of filler.
The decision to utilize full circumference cigarettes with a single wrap of 45 g/m'
paper using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent for the Ambrosia II POL's will
mean that additional paper development work will be required for these lower basis weight
papers. The study with the highest priority will be to investigate the effect of malonic acid on
these papers. Results with 63g/m' papers suggest that it should be possible to increase
sidestream reduction from the current 55-60% range to the 65-70% range. The 091 base paper
will be coated in-house with various levels of mono potassium phosphate and malonic acid in
order to optimize the system. Also, it will be necessary to investigate the stability of Aromatek
245 on papers containing malonic acid. Work to improve the subjectives of models optimized
for sidestream reduction through the use of charcoal filters and the design of aftercut flavors
will also be carried out.
A series of hand-made cigarettes has been made from hand sheets with a basis weight of
30 g/m' , various ratios of Albacar calcium carbonate and titanium dioxide as the inorganic
filler, and sodium fumarate (0.8% to 1.5%) as the fluxing agent. All models containing
titanium dioxide gave increased sidestream visibility as compared to either a model with
calcium carbonate as the sole inorganic filler with sodium fumarate as the fluxing agent or to
the standard control cigarette (AFK). This experiment clearly indicates that neither the use of
titanium dioxide or sodium fumarate in Japanese cigarette wrappers plays any role in the
observed lower sidestream visibility for these cigarettes.
Hand sheets were made utilizing a 30% level of a high surface area magnesium
carbonate semihydrate made by the pyrolysis of magnesium ammonium carbonate. Cigarettes
made from these hand sheets using potassium succinate as the fluxing agent gave significant
sidestream reduction as well as an acceptable ash. More work will be done with this system.
A set of six hand sheets obtained from Ecusta containing Baymag A (Canadian
magnesite) as the inorganic filler was used for hand-made models. These sheets were part of
the matrix study. The sheets were made to two basis weights, 55 and 65 g/m' , and varied in
filer level (25-35%) and porosity (4.7 to 10.7 Coresta). Based upon inspection of the
sidestream reductions obtained, it would appear that porosity is the controlling variable.
Sidestream reductions varied inversely with porosity irrespective of the other two variables.
In order for us to make valid comparisons of our data with data obtained at Ecusta, a
study was completed wherein a series of five cigarettes which varied significantly in sidestream
visibility was evaluated in-house using the eight-port visibility instrument and at Ecusta using a
- 2 -
2022155887
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 315,
"image": "nhxj0037_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "nhxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 724
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nThe low sidestream panel smoked two magnesium containing papers made at the\nUniversity of Maine and found them to very dry. Additional papers will be made by Chemical\nResearch Division personnel with lower levels of filler.\nThe decision to utilize full circumference cigarettes with a single wrap of 45 g/m'\npaper using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent for the Ambrosia II POL's will\nmean that additional paper development work will be required for these lower basis weight\npapers. The study with the highest priority will be to investigate the effect of malonic acid on\nthese papers. Results with 63g/m' papers suggest that it should be possible to increase\nsidestream reduction from the current 55-60% range to the 65-70% range. The 091 base paper\nwill be coated in-house with various levels of mono potassium phosphate and malonic acid in\norder to optimize the system. Also, it will be necessary to investigate the stability of Aromatek\n245 on papers containing malonic acid. Work to improve the subjectives of models optimized\nfor sidestream reduction through the use of charcoal filters and the design of aftercut flavors\nwill also be carried out.\nA series of hand-made cigarettes has been made from hand sheets with a basis weight of\n30 g/m' , various ratios of Albacar calcium carbonate and titanium dioxide as the inorganic\nfiller, and sodium fumarate (0.8% to 1.5%) as the fluxing agent. All models containing\ntitanium dioxide gave increased sidestream visibility as compared to either a model with\ncalcium carbonate as the sole inorganic filler with sodium fumarate as the fluxing agent or to\nthe standard control cigarette (AFK). This experiment clearly indicates that neither the use of\ntitanium dioxide or sodium fumarate in Japanese cigarette wrappers plays any role in the\nobserved lower sidestream visibility for these cigarettes.\nHand sheets were made utilizing a 30% level of a high surface area magnesium\ncarbonate semihydrate made by the pyrolysis of magnesium ammonium carbonate. Cigarettes\nmade from these hand sheets using potassium succinate as the fluxing agent gave significant\nsidestream reduction as well as an acceptable ash. More work will be done with this system.\nA set of six hand sheets obtained from Ecusta containing Baymag A (Canadian\nmagnesite) as the inorganic filler was used for hand-made models. These sheets were part of\nthe matrix study. The sheets were made to two basis weights, 55 and 65 g/m' , and varied in\nfiler level (25-35%) and porosity (4.7 to 10.7 Coresta). Based upon inspection of the\nsidestream reductions obtained, it would appear that porosity is the controlling variable.\nSidestream reductions varied inversely with porosity irrespective of the other two variables.\nIn order for us to make valid comparisons of our data with data obtained at Ecusta, a\nstudy was completed wherein a series of five cigarettes which varied significantly in sidestream\nvisibility was evaluated in-house using the eight-port visibility instrument and at Ecusta using a\n- 2 -\n2022155887\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037\n\nQuestion: Which base paper will be coated in-house with various levels of mono potassium phosphate and malonic acid in order to optimize the system?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "091",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
466
|
which cigarette would be better if offered on a thicker cigarette
|
low smoke cigarette
|
Page 5
unprompted comments concerning low smoke. Unprompted comments were made
about the circumference. These smokers said a low smoke product might result in
less criticism of smoking-if the nonsmoker was not a fanatic against smoking--but
probably would not result in compliments. Many of these smokers did not seem to
be relating low smoke to VSSS but were thinking of a hypothetically full
circumference cigarette--a product of the future.
When asked if VSSS lived up to the advertising claim that they give off 70% less
smoke than a leading 100's cigarette, only approximately ten percent expressed
disbelief. However, a percent reduction (e.g. 70%) really meant little (besides
sounding impressive) because these smokers had not thought of visible smoke in
terms of percents nor had they compared VSSS smoke to a regular circumference
cigarette. They had no reason to doubt what the ad claimed.
VSSS Circumference
These smokers said that a low smoke cigarette would be better if offered on a thicker
cigarette (e.g., 25mm or 23mm). They said the thinness of VSSS was cute, unique,
novel, very feminine but were not sure how long this uniqueness would be
appealing. Some said the thinness brought attention to their smoking--something
hey were not interested in doing. These smokers feared dropping or misplacing
VSSS. They attributed the low smoke to the thinness of VSSS. When asked if they
would be more interested in a reduction in smoke of 85% they said no because that
would mean that the cigarette would be even thinner.
Smoke Odor
The majority said that smoke odor--specifically lingering-was annoying to the
smoker. They also agreed that nonsmokers were bothered by cigarette odors. The
number one annoyance was lingering odors; however, many said all odors associate
with cigarettes annoyed nonsmokers. Cigarette odors were viewed as more of an
annoyance to nonsmokers than visible smoke. When asked about the odor of VSSS,
forty percent said VSSS had a lighter, better odor (fresh and lingering) than a full
circumference 100's. However, they said that this may have just been a perception
because of the thinness and reduction in visible smoke. Over fifty percent had not
noticed any difference in the odor of VSSS.
2022156005
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 354,
"image": "fxxj0037_5.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "fxxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "5"
}
| 561
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 5\nunprompted comments concerning low smoke. Unprompted comments were made\nabout the circumference. These smokers said a low smoke product might result in\nless criticism of smoking-if the nonsmoker was not a fanatic against smoking--but\nprobably would not result in compliments. Many of these smokers did not seem to\nbe relating low smoke to VSSS but were thinking of a hypothetically full\ncircumference cigarette--a product of the future.\nWhen asked if VSSS lived up to the advertising claim that they give off 70% less\nsmoke than a leading 100's cigarette, only approximately ten percent expressed\ndisbelief. However, a percent reduction (e.g. 70%) really meant little (besides\nsounding impressive) because these smokers had not thought of visible smoke in\nterms of percents nor had they compared VSSS smoke to a regular circumference\ncigarette. They had no reason to doubt what the ad claimed.\nVSSS Circumference\nThese smokers said that a low smoke cigarette would be better if offered on a thicker\ncigarette (e.g., 25mm or 23mm). They said the thinness of VSSS was cute, unique,\nnovel, very feminine but were not sure how long this uniqueness would be\nappealing. Some said the thinness brought attention to their smoking--something\nhey were not interested in doing. These smokers feared dropping or misplacing\nVSSS. They attributed the low smoke to the thinness of VSSS. When asked if they\nwould be more interested in a reduction in smoke of 85% they said no because that\nwould mean that the cigarette would be even thinner.\nSmoke Odor\nThe majority said that smoke odor--specifically lingering-was annoying to the\nsmoker. They also agreed that nonsmokers were bothered by cigarette odors. The\nnumber one annoyance was lingering odors; however, many said all odors associate\nwith cigarettes annoyed nonsmokers. Cigarette odors were viewed as more of an\nannoyance to nonsmokers than visible smoke. When asked about the odor of VSSS,\nforty percent said VSSS had a lighter, better odor (fresh and lingering) than a full\ncircumference 100's. However, they said that this may have just been a perception\nbecause of the thinness and reduction in visible smoke. Over fifty percent had not\nnoticed any difference in the odor of VSSS.\n2022156005\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037\n\nQuestion: which cigarette would be better if offered on a thicker cigarette",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "low smoke cigarette",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
467
|
Hand sheets were made utilizing a 30% level of which component?
|
high surface area magnesium carbonate semihydrate made by the pyrolysis of magnesium ammonium carbonate
|
Page 2
The low sidestream panel smoked two magnesium containing papers made at the
University of Maine and found them to very dry. Additional papers will be made by Chemical
Research Division personnel with lower levels of filler.
The decision to utilize full circumference cigarettes with a single wrap of 45 g/m'
paper using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent for the Ambrosia II POL's will
mean that additional paper development work will be required for these lower basis weight
papers. The study with the highest priority will be to investigate the effect of malonic acid on
these papers. Results with 63g/m' papers suggest that it should be possible to increase
sidestream reduction from the current 55-60% range to the 65-70% range. The 091 base paper
will be coated in-house with various levels of mono potassium phosphate and malonic acid in
order to optimize the system. Also, it will be necessary to investigate the stability of Aromatek
245 on papers containing malonic acid. Work to improve the subjectives of models optimized
for sidestream reduction through the use of charcoal filters and the design of aftercut flavors
will also be carried out.
A series of hand-made cigarettes has been made from hand sheets with a basis weight of
30 g/m' , various ratios of Albacar calcium carbonate and titanium dioxide as the inorganic
filler, and sodium fumarate (0.8% to 1.5%) as the fluxing agent. All models containing
titanium dioxide gave increased sidestream visibility as compared to either a model with
calcium carbonate as the sole inorganic filler with sodium fumarate as the fluxing agent or to
the standard control cigarette (AFK). This experiment clearly indicates that neither the use of
titanium dioxide or sodium fumarate in Japanese cigarette wrappers plays any role in the
observed lower sidestream visibility for these cigarettes.
Hand sheets were made utilizing a 30% level of a high surface area magnesium
carbonate semihydrate made by the pyrolysis of magnesium ammonium carbonate. Cigarettes
made from these hand sheets using potassium succinate as the fluxing agent gave significant
sidestream reduction as well as an acceptable ash. More work will be done with this system.
A set of six hand sheets obtained from Ecusta containing Baymag A (Canadian
magnesite) as the inorganic filler was used for hand-made models. These sheets were part of
the matrix study. The sheets were made to two basis weights, 55 and 65 g/m' , and varied in
filer level (25-35%) and porosity (4.7 to 10.7 Coresta). Based upon inspection of the
sidestream reductions obtained, it would appear that porosity is the controlling variable.
Sidestream reductions varied inversely with porosity irrespective of the other two variables.
In order for us to make valid comparisons of our data with data obtained at Ecusta, a
study was completed wherein a series of five cigarettes which varied significantly in sidestream
visibility was evaluated in-house using the eight-port visibility instrument and at Ecusta using a
- 2 -
2022155887
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 315,
"image": "nhxj0037_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "nhxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 733
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nThe low sidestream panel smoked two magnesium containing papers made at the\nUniversity of Maine and found them to very dry. Additional papers will be made by Chemical\nResearch Division personnel with lower levels of filler.\nThe decision to utilize full circumference cigarettes with a single wrap of 45 g/m'\npaper using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent for the Ambrosia II POL's will\nmean that additional paper development work will be required for these lower basis weight\npapers. The study with the highest priority will be to investigate the effect of malonic acid on\nthese papers. Results with 63g/m' papers suggest that it should be possible to increase\nsidestream reduction from the current 55-60% range to the 65-70% range. The 091 base paper\nwill be coated in-house with various levels of mono potassium phosphate and malonic acid in\norder to optimize the system. Also, it will be necessary to investigate the stability of Aromatek\n245 on papers containing malonic acid. Work to improve the subjectives of models optimized\nfor sidestream reduction through the use of charcoal filters and the design of aftercut flavors\nwill also be carried out.\nA series of hand-made cigarettes has been made from hand sheets with a basis weight of\n30 g/m' , various ratios of Albacar calcium carbonate and titanium dioxide as the inorganic\nfiller, and sodium fumarate (0.8% to 1.5%) as the fluxing agent. All models containing\ntitanium dioxide gave increased sidestream visibility as compared to either a model with\ncalcium carbonate as the sole inorganic filler with sodium fumarate as the fluxing agent or to\nthe standard control cigarette (AFK). This experiment clearly indicates that neither the use of\ntitanium dioxide or sodium fumarate in Japanese cigarette wrappers plays any role in the\nobserved lower sidestream visibility for these cigarettes.\nHand sheets were made utilizing a 30% level of a high surface area magnesium\ncarbonate semihydrate made by the pyrolysis of magnesium ammonium carbonate. Cigarettes\nmade from these hand sheets using potassium succinate as the fluxing agent gave significant\nsidestream reduction as well as an acceptable ash. More work will be done with this system.\nA set of six hand sheets obtained from Ecusta containing Baymag A (Canadian\nmagnesite) as the inorganic filler was used for hand-made models. These sheets were part of\nthe matrix study. The sheets were made to two basis weights, 55 and 65 g/m' , and varied in\nfiler level (25-35%) and porosity (4.7 to 10.7 Coresta). Based upon inspection of the\nsidestream reductions obtained, it would appear that porosity is the controlling variable.\nSidestream reductions varied inversely with porosity irrespective of the other two variables.\nIn order for us to make valid comparisons of our data with data obtained at Ecusta, a\nstudy was completed wherein a series of five cigarettes which varied significantly in sidestream\nvisibility was evaluated in-house using the eight-port visibility instrument and at Ecusta using a\n- 2 -\n2022155887\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037\n\nQuestion: Hand sheets were made utilizing a 30% level of which component?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "high surface area magnesium carbonate semihydrate made by the pyrolysis of magnesium ammonium carbonate",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
468
|
How much percent had not noticed any difference in the odor of VSSS
|
Over Fifty percent
|
Page 5
unprompted comments concerning low smoke. Unprompted comments were made
about the circumference. These smokers said a low smoke product might result in
less criticism of smoking-if the nonsmoker was not a fanatic against smoking--but
probably would not result in compliments. Many of these smokers did not seem to
be relating low smoke to VSSS but were thinking of a hypothetically full
circumference cigarette--a product of the future.
When asked if VSSS lived up to the advertising claim that they give off 70% less
smoke than a leading 100's cigarette, only approximately ten percent expressed
disbelief. However, a percent reduction (e.g. 70%) really meant little (besides
sounding impressive) because these smokers had not thought of visible smoke in
terms of percents nor had they compared VSSS smoke to a regular circumference
cigarette. They had no reason to doubt what the ad claimed.
VSSS Circumference
These smokers said that a low smoke cigarette would be better if offered on a thicker
cigarette (e.g., 25mm or 23mm). They said the thinness of VSSS was cute, unique,
novel, very feminine but were not sure how long this uniqueness would be
appealing. Some said the thinness brought attention to their smoking--something
hey were not interested in doing. These smokers feared dropping or misplacing
VSSS. They attributed the low smoke to the thinness of VSSS. When asked if they
would be more interested in a reduction in smoke of 85% they said no because that
would mean that the cigarette would be even thinner.
Smoke Odor
The majority said that smoke odor--specifically lingering-was annoying to the
smoker. They also agreed that nonsmokers were bothered by cigarette odors. The
number one annoyance was lingering odors; however, many said all odors associate
with cigarettes annoyed nonsmokers. Cigarette odors were viewed as more of an
annoyance to nonsmokers than visible smoke. When asked about the odor of VSSS,
forty percent said VSSS had a lighter, better odor (fresh and lingering) than a full
circumference 100's. However, they said that this may have just been a perception
because of the thinness and reduction in visible smoke. Over fifty percent had not
noticed any difference in the odor of VSSS.
2022156005
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 354,
"image": "fxxj0037_5.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "fxxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "5"
}
| 565
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 5\nunprompted comments concerning low smoke. Unprompted comments were made\nabout the circumference. These smokers said a low smoke product might result in\nless criticism of smoking-if the nonsmoker was not a fanatic against smoking--but\nprobably would not result in compliments. Many of these smokers did not seem to\nbe relating low smoke to VSSS but were thinking of a hypothetically full\ncircumference cigarette--a product of the future.\nWhen asked if VSSS lived up to the advertising claim that they give off 70% less\nsmoke than a leading 100's cigarette, only approximately ten percent expressed\ndisbelief. However, a percent reduction (e.g. 70%) really meant little (besides\nsounding impressive) because these smokers had not thought of visible smoke in\nterms of percents nor had they compared VSSS smoke to a regular circumference\ncigarette. They had no reason to doubt what the ad claimed.\nVSSS Circumference\nThese smokers said that a low smoke cigarette would be better if offered on a thicker\ncigarette (e.g., 25mm or 23mm). They said the thinness of VSSS was cute, unique,\nnovel, very feminine but were not sure how long this uniqueness would be\nappealing. Some said the thinness brought attention to their smoking--something\nhey were not interested in doing. These smokers feared dropping or misplacing\nVSSS. They attributed the low smoke to the thinness of VSSS. When asked if they\nwould be more interested in a reduction in smoke of 85% they said no because that\nwould mean that the cigarette would be even thinner.\nSmoke Odor\nThe majority said that smoke odor--specifically lingering-was annoying to the\nsmoker. They also agreed that nonsmokers were bothered by cigarette odors. The\nnumber one annoyance was lingering odors; however, many said all odors associate\nwith cigarettes annoyed nonsmokers. Cigarette odors were viewed as more of an\nannoyance to nonsmokers than visible smoke. When asked about the odor of VSSS,\nforty percent said VSSS had a lighter, better odor (fresh and lingering) than a full\ncircumference 100's. However, they said that this may have just been a perception\nbecause of the thinness and reduction in visible smoke. Over fifty percent had not\nnoticed any difference in the odor of VSSS.\n2022156005\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037\n\nQuestion: How much percent had not noticed any difference in the odor of VSSS",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Over Fifty percent",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
469
|
who were bothered by cigarette odors
|
Nonsmokers
|
Page 5
unprompted comments concerning low smoke. Unprompted comments were made
about the circumference. These smokers said a low smoke product might result in
less criticism of smoking-if the nonsmoker was not a fanatic against smoking--but
probably would not result in compliments. Many of these smokers did not seem to
be relating low smoke to VSSS but were thinking of a hypothetically full
circumference cigarette--a product of the future.
When asked if VSSS lived up to the advertising claim that they give off 70% less
smoke than a leading 100's cigarette, only approximately ten percent expressed
disbelief. However, a percent reduction (e.g. 70%) really meant little (besides
sounding impressive) because these smokers had not thought of visible smoke in
terms of percents nor had they compared VSSS smoke to a regular circumference
cigarette. They had no reason to doubt what the ad claimed.
VSSS Circumference
These smokers said that a low smoke cigarette would be better if offered on a thicker
cigarette (e.g., 25mm or 23mm). They said the thinness of VSSS was cute, unique,
novel, very feminine but were not sure how long this uniqueness would be
appealing. Some said the thinness brought attention to their smoking--something
hey were not interested in doing. These smokers feared dropping or misplacing
VSSS. They attributed the low smoke to the thinness of VSSS. When asked if they
would be more interested in a reduction in smoke of 85% they said no because that
would mean that the cigarette would be even thinner.
Smoke Odor
The majority said that smoke odor--specifically lingering-was annoying to the
smoker. They also agreed that nonsmokers were bothered by cigarette odors. The
number one annoyance was lingering odors; however, many said all odors associate
with cigarettes annoyed nonsmokers. Cigarette odors were viewed as more of an
annoyance to nonsmokers than visible smoke. When asked about the odor of VSSS,
forty percent said VSSS had a lighter, better odor (fresh and lingering) than a full
circumference 100's. However, they said that this may have just been a perception
because of the thinness and reduction in visible smoke. Over fifty percent had not
noticed any difference in the odor of VSSS.
2022156005
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 354,
"image": "fxxj0037_5.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "fxxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "5"
}
| 558
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 5\nunprompted comments concerning low smoke. Unprompted comments were made\nabout the circumference. These smokers said a low smoke product might result in\nless criticism of smoking-if the nonsmoker was not a fanatic against smoking--but\nprobably would not result in compliments. Many of these smokers did not seem to\nbe relating low smoke to VSSS but were thinking of a hypothetically full\ncircumference cigarette--a product of the future.\nWhen asked if VSSS lived up to the advertising claim that they give off 70% less\nsmoke than a leading 100's cigarette, only approximately ten percent expressed\ndisbelief. However, a percent reduction (e.g. 70%) really meant little (besides\nsounding impressive) because these smokers had not thought of visible smoke in\nterms of percents nor had they compared VSSS smoke to a regular circumference\ncigarette. They had no reason to doubt what the ad claimed.\nVSSS Circumference\nThese smokers said that a low smoke cigarette would be better if offered on a thicker\ncigarette (e.g., 25mm or 23mm). They said the thinness of VSSS was cute, unique,\nnovel, very feminine but were not sure how long this uniqueness would be\nappealing. Some said the thinness brought attention to their smoking--something\nhey were not interested in doing. These smokers feared dropping or misplacing\nVSSS. They attributed the low smoke to the thinness of VSSS. When asked if they\nwould be more interested in a reduction in smoke of 85% they said no because that\nwould mean that the cigarette would be even thinner.\nSmoke Odor\nThe majority said that smoke odor--specifically lingering-was annoying to the\nsmoker. They also agreed that nonsmokers were bothered by cigarette odors. The\nnumber one annoyance was lingering odors; however, many said all odors associate\nwith cigarettes annoyed nonsmokers. Cigarette odors were viewed as more of an\nannoyance to nonsmokers than visible smoke. When asked about the odor of VSSS,\nforty percent said VSSS had a lighter, better odor (fresh and lingering) than a full\ncircumference 100's. However, they said that this may have just been a perception\nbecause of the thinness and reduction in visible smoke. Over fifty percent had not\nnoticed any difference in the odor of VSSS.\n2022156005\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037\n\nQuestion: who were bothered by cigarette odors",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Nonsmokers",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
478
|
What is the heading of first table?
|
Slim Cigarettes
|
Page 4
SLIM CIGARETTES
Cigarette Name
RIP-6
RIP-4
More White Lts 120
61/6
6SE/6
SAVANNAH Lt 100 Brown
61/6
3NI/3SE
Stixs
61/6
21/3NI/1SE
CAPRI
51/3NI
2NI/4SE
Virginia Slim SS 100 Box
61/6
INI/5SE
Virginia Slim SS 100 Men Box
51/1SE
6SE/6
GPC
61/6
41/1NI/1SE
KOOL KS
61/6
41/1NI/1SE
K. C. CIGARETTES
Cigarette Code
RIP-6(W/0 Filter)
RIP-6(W/Filter)
P4049 -99 (5C)
21/4SE
6SE
P4049-99A (7C)
11/5SE
6SE
2. 5% AlC13 on GPC
31/3SE
584100576
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 317,
"image": "rncj0037_4.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rncj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "4"
}
| 279
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 4\nSLIM CIGARETTES\nCigarette Name\nRIP-6\nRIP-4\nMore White Lts 120\n61/6\n6SE/6\nSAVANNAH Lt 100 Brown\n61/6\n3NI/3SE\nStixs\n61/6\n21/3NI/1SE\nCAPRI\n51/3NI\n2NI/4SE\nVirginia Slim SS 100 Box\n61/6\nINI/5SE\nVirginia Slim SS 100 Men Box\n51/1SE\n6SE/6\nGPC\n61/6\n41/1NI/1SE\nKOOL KS\n61/6\n41/1NI/1SE\nK. C. CIGARETTES\nCigarette Code\nRIP-6(W/0 Filter)\nRIP-6(W/Filter)\nP4049 -99 (5C)\n21/4SE\n6SE\nP4049-99A (7C)\n11/5SE\n6SE\n2. 5% AlC13 on GPC\n31/3SE\n584100576\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the heading of first table?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Slim Cigarettes",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
479
|
What is RIP-6 value for KOOL KS?
|
6I/6
|
Page 4
SLIM CIGARETTES
Cigarette Name
RIP-6
RIP-4
More White Lts 120
61/6
6SE/6
SAVANNAH Lt 100 Brown
61/6
3NI/3SE
Stixs
61/6
21/3NI/1SE
CAPRI
51/3NI
2NI/4SE
Virginia Slim SS 100 Box
61/6
INI/5SE
Virginia Slim SS 100 Men Box
51/1SE
6SE/6
GPC
61/6
41/1NI/1SE
KOOL KS
61/6
41/1NI/1SE
K. C. CIGARETTES
Cigarette Code
RIP-6(W/0 Filter)
RIP-6(W/Filter)
P4049 -99 (5C)
21/4SE
6SE
P4049-99A (7C)
11/5SE
6SE
2. 5% AlC13 on GPC
31/3SE
584100576
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 317,
"image": "rncj0037_4.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rncj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "4"
}
| 282
|
none
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 4\nSLIM CIGARETTES\nCigarette Name\nRIP-6\nRIP-4\nMore White Lts 120\n61/6\n6SE/6\nSAVANNAH Lt 100 Brown\n61/6\n3NI/3SE\nStixs\n61/6\n21/3NI/1SE\nCAPRI\n51/3NI\n2NI/4SE\nVirginia Slim SS 100 Box\n61/6\nINI/5SE\nVirginia Slim SS 100 Men Box\n51/1SE\n6SE/6\nGPC\n61/6\n41/1NI/1SE\nKOOL KS\n61/6\n41/1NI/1SE\nK. C. CIGARETTES\nCigarette Code\nRIP-6(W/0 Filter)\nRIP-6(W/Filter)\nP4049 -99 (5C)\n21/4SE\n6SE\nP4049-99A (7C)\n11/5SE\n6SE\n2. 5% AlC13 on GPC\n31/3SE\n584100576\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037\n\nQuestion: What is RIP-6 value for KOOL KS?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "6I/6",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
480
|
What is the heading of second table
|
K. C. Cigarettes
|
Page 4
SLIM CIGARETTES
Cigarette Name
RIP-6
RIP-4
More White Lts 120
61/6
6SE/6
SAVANNAH Lt 100 Brown
61/6
3NI/3SE
Stixs
61/6
21/3NI/1SE
CAPRI
51/3NI
2NI/4SE
Virginia Slim SS 100 Box
61/6
INI/5SE
Virginia Slim SS 100 Men Box
51/1SE
6SE/6
GPC
61/6
41/1NI/1SE
KOOL KS
61/6
41/1NI/1SE
K. C. CIGARETTES
Cigarette Code
RIP-6(W/0 Filter)
RIP-6(W/Filter)
P4049 -99 (5C)
21/4SE
6SE
P4049-99A (7C)
11/5SE
6SE
2. 5% AlC13 on GPC
31/3SE
584100576
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 317,
"image": "rncj0037_4.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rncj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "4"
}
| 281
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 4\nSLIM CIGARETTES\nCigarette Name\nRIP-6\nRIP-4\nMore White Lts 120\n61/6\n6SE/6\nSAVANNAH Lt 100 Brown\n61/6\n3NI/3SE\nStixs\n61/6\n21/3NI/1SE\nCAPRI\n51/3NI\n2NI/4SE\nVirginia Slim SS 100 Box\n61/6\nINI/5SE\nVirginia Slim SS 100 Men Box\n51/1SE\n6SE/6\nGPC\n61/6\n41/1NI/1SE\nKOOL KS\n61/6\n41/1NI/1SE\nK. C. CIGARETTES\nCigarette Code\nRIP-6(W/0 Filter)\nRIP-6(W/Filter)\nP4049 -99 (5C)\n21/4SE\n6SE\nP4049-99A (7C)\n11/5SE\n6SE\n2. 5% AlC13 on GPC\n31/3SE\n584100576\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the heading of second table",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "K. C. Cigarettes",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
DocVQA for Nanochat
Single-page document QA dataset processed for nanochat fine-tuning.
Description
This dataset is derived from pixparse/docvqa-single-page-questions and has been processed for efficient fine-tuning of small language models with limited context windows.
Modifications from Source
- OCR truncation: Answer-priority truncation ensures the answer is always present in the truncated context. Lines containing the answer are prioritized, then surrounding context is added until the token budget is reached.
- Page numbers: Added "Page X" header at the top of each document from
other_metadata.ucsf_document_page_no - Token budget: Documents truncated to fit within 1750 tokens (for 2048 context window models)
- Short answers: Filtered to answers ≤150 characters
- Format: Conversation format compatible with nanochat's CustomJSON task loader
Statistics
| Split | Samples | Total Tokens | Avg Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|
| Train | 39,455 | 15,495,380 | 393 |
| Validation | 5,349 | 2,218,651 | 415 |
| Total | 44,804 | 17,714,031 | - |
Tokenizer
Token counts computed with tiktoken cl100k_base (GPT-4's tokenizer). This is a GPT-4 style BPE tokenizer similar to what nanochat uses.
Schema
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
question_id |
int | Original question ID from DocVQA |
question |
str | The question to answer |
answer |
str | The extracted answer (or "Not found in document.") |
document_text |
str | OCR text with page number prepended |
page |
int | Page number from OCR results (always 1 for single-page) |
other_metadata |
dict | Full metadata from source (ucsf_document_id, doc_id, etc.) |
num_tokens |
int | Exact token count (tiktoken cl100k_base) |
match_type |
str | How answer was matched: "exact", "fuzzy", or "none" |
messages |
list | Conversation format for training |
Usage
With HuggingFace Datasets
from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("morgan/docvqa-nanochat")
# Access a sample
sample = ds["train"][0]
print(f"Question: {{sample['question']}}")
print(f"Answer: {{sample['answer']}}")
print(f"Tokens: {{sample['num_tokens']}}")
For Nanochat Training
The messages field is formatted for nanochat's CustomJSON task:
# Download and convert to JSONL
from datasets import load_dataset
import json
ds = load_dataset("morgan/docvqa-nanochat", split="train")
with open("docvqa_train.jsonl", "w") as f:
for row in ds:
f.write(json.dumps(row["messages"]) + "\n")
# Then use with CustomJSON
from tasks.customjson import CustomJSON
train_ds = CustomJSON(filepath="docvqa_train.jsonl")
Document Format
Each document is formatted as:
Document:
Page 4
R. J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY
RETAIL PARTNERS MARKETING PLAN CONTRACT
...
Question: When is the contract effective date?
License
Same as source dataset (pixparse/docvqa-single-page-questions).
Citation
If you use this dataset, please cite the original DocVQA paper:
@inproceedings{mathew2021docvqa,
title={DocVQA: A Dataset for VQA on Document Images},
author={Mathew, Minesh and Karatzas, Dimosthenis and Jawahar, CV},
booktitle={WACV},
year={2021}
}
- Downloads last month
- 10