question_id
int64 337
65.5k
| question
stringlengths 11
209
| answer
stringlengths 1
145
| document_text
stringlengths 30
7.9k
| page
int64 1
1
| other_metadata
dict | num_tokens
int64 26
1.76k
| match_type
stringclasses 3
values | messages
listlengths 2
2
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
752
|
What is the DOCKET NO?
|
8839
|
Page 1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
COMMISSIONERS :
Lewis A. Engman, Chairman
Paul Rand Dixon
Mary Gardiner Jones
David S. Dennison, Jr.
Mayo J. Thompson
In the Matter of
THE COCA-COLA COMPANY,
a corporation, and
DOCKET NO. 8839
THE MARSCHALK COMPANY, INC. ,
a corporation.
FINAL ORDER
This matter is before the Commission on the
appeal of complaint counsel from the initial decision
of the Administrative Law Judge issued on September
15, 1972, dismissing the complaint.
Upon examination
of the record, the initial decision, and the briefs
and oral argument in support of this appeal and in
opposition thereto, the Commission has concluded, for
the reasons set forth in the accompanying opinion,
that the initial decision of the Administrative Law
Judge should be adopted and issued as the decision of
the Commission. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that complaint counsel's appeal
from the initial decision of the Administrative Law
Judge be, and it hereby is, denied
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the initial decision
of the Administrative Law Judge be, and it hereby is,
adopted as the decision of the Commission.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint in the
captioned matter be, and it hereby is, dismissed.
By the Commission, Commissioner Jones dissenting.
SEAL
Secretary
ISSUED: October 5, 1973
ATTACHMENT: Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Jones.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/szyj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 403,
"image": "szyj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "szyj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 361
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA\nBEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION\nCOMMISSIONERS :\nLewis A. Engman, Chairman\nPaul Rand Dixon\nMary Gardiner Jones\nDavid S. Dennison, Jr.\nMayo J. Thompson\nIn the Matter of\nTHE COCA-COLA COMPANY,\na corporation, and\nDOCKET NO. 8839\nTHE MARSCHALK COMPANY, INC. ,\na corporation.\nFINAL ORDER\nThis matter is before the Commission on the\nappeal of complaint counsel from the initial decision\nof the Administrative Law Judge issued on September\n15, 1972, dismissing the complaint.\nUpon examination\nof the record, the initial decision, and the briefs\nand oral argument in support of this appeal and in\nopposition thereto, the Commission has concluded, for\nthe reasons set forth in the accompanying opinion,\nthat the initial decision of the Administrative Law\nJudge should be adopted and issued as the decision of\nthe Commission. Accordingly,\nIT IS ORDERED that complaint counsel's appeal\nfrom the initial decision of the Administrative Law\nJudge be, and it hereby is, denied\nIT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the initial decision\nof the Administrative Law Judge be, and it hereby is,\nadopted as the decision of the Commission.\nIT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint in the\ncaptioned matter be, and it hereby is, dismissed.\nBy the Commission, Commissioner Jones dissenting.\nSEAL\nSecretary\nISSUED: October 5, 1973\nATTACHMENT: Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Jones.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/szyj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the DOCKET NO?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "8839",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
754
|
When was this document issued?
|
October 5, 1973
|
Page 1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
COMMISSIONERS :
Lewis A. Engman, Chairman
Paul Rand Dixon
Mary Gardiner Jones
David S. Dennison, Jr.
Mayo J. Thompson
In the Matter of
THE COCA-COLA COMPANY,
a corporation, and
DOCKET NO. 8839
THE MARSCHALK COMPANY, INC. ,
a corporation.
FINAL ORDER
This matter is before the Commission on the
appeal of complaint counsel from the initial decision
of the Administrative Law Judge issued on September
15, 1972, dismissing the complaint.
Upon examination
of the record, the initial decision, and the briefs
and oral argument in support of this appeal and in
opposition thereto, the Commission has concluded, for
the reasons set forth in the accompanying opinion,
that the initial decision of the Administrative Law
Judge should be adopted and issued as the decision of
the Commission. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that complaint counsel's appeal
from the initial decision of the Administrative Law
Judge be, and it hereby is, denied
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the initial decision
of the Administrative Law Judge be, and it hereby is,
adopted as the decision of the Commission.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint in the
captioned matter be, and it hereby is, dismissed.
By the Commission, Commissioner Jones dissenting.
SEAL
Secretary
ISSUED: October 5, 1973
ATTACHMENT: Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Jones.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/szyj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 403,
"image": "szyj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "szyj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 365
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA\nBEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION\nCOMMISSIONERS :\nLewis A. Engman, Chairman\nPaul Rand Dixon\nMary Gardiner Jones\nDavid S. Dennison, Jr.\nMayo J. Thompson\nIn the Matter of\nTHE COCA-COLA COMPANY,\na corporation, and\nDOCKET NO. 8839\nTHE MARSCHALK COMPANY, INC. ,\na corporation.\nFINAL ORDER\nThis matter is before the Commission on the\nappeal of complaint counsel from the initial decision\nof the Administrative Law Judge issued on September\n15, 1972, dismissing the complaint.\nUpon examination\nof the record, the initial decision, and the briefs\nand oral argument in support of this appeal and in\nopposition thereto, the Commission has concluded, for\nthe reasons set forth in the accompanying opinion,\nthat the initial decision of the Administrative Law\nJudge should be adopted and issued as the decision of\nthe Commission. Accordingly,\nIT IS ORDERED that complaint counsel's appeal\nfrom the initial decision of the Administrative Law\nJudge be, and it hereby is, denied\nIT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the initial decision\nof the Administrative Law Judge be, and it hereby is,\nadopted as the decision of the Commission.\nIT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint in the\ncaptioned matter be, and it hereby is, dismissed.\nBy the Commission, Commissioner Jones dissenting.\nSEAL\nSecretary\nISSUED: October 5, 1973\nATTACHMENT: Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Jones.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/szyj0226\n\nQuestion: When was this document issued?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "October 5, 1973",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
755
|
Who is the secretary?
|
Charles A. Tobin
|
Page 1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
COMMISSIONERS :
Lewis A. Engman, Chairman
Paul Rand Dixon
Mary Gardiner Jones
David S. Dennison, Jr.
Mayo J. Thompson
In the Matter of
THE COCA-COLA COMPANY,
a corporation, and
DOCKET NO. 8839
THE MARSCHALK COMPANY, INC. ,
a corporation.
FINAL ORDER
This matter is before the Commission on the
appeal of complaint counsel from the initial decision
of the Administrative Law Judge issued on September
15, 1972, dismissing the complaint.
Upon examination
of the record, the initial decision, and the briefs
and oral argument in support of this appeal and in
opposition thereto, the Commission has concluded, for
the reasons set forth in the accompanying opinion,
that the initial decision of the Administrative Law
Judge should be adopted and issued as the decision of
the Commission. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that complaint counsel's appeal
from the initial decision of the Administrative Law
Judge be, and it hereby is, denied
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the initial decision
of the Administrative Law Judge be, and it hereby is,
adopted as the decision of the Commission.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint in the
captioned matter be, and it hereby is, dismissed.
By the Commission, Commissioner Jones dissenting.
SEAL
Secretary
ISSUED: October 5, 1973
ATTACHMENT: Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Jones.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/szyj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 403,
"image": "szyj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "szyj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 362
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA\nBEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION\nCOMMISSIONERS :\nLewis A. Engman, Chairman\nPaul Rand Dixon\nMary Gardiner Jones\nDavid S. Dennison, Jr.\nMayo J. Thompson\nIn the Matter of\nTHE COCA-COLA COMPANY,\na corporation, and\nDOCKET NO. 8839\nTHE MARSCHALK COMPANY, INC. ,\na corporation.\nFINAL ORDER\nThis matter is before the Commission on the\nappeal of complaint counsel from the initial decision\nof the Administrative Law Judge issued on September\n15, 1972, dismissing the complaint.\nUpon examination\nof the record, the initial decision, and the briefs\nand oral argument in support of this appeal and in\nopposition thereto, the Commission has concluded, for\nthe reasons set forth in the accompanying opinion,\nthat the initial decision of the Administrative Law\nJudge should be adopted and issued as the decision of\nthe Commission. Accordingly,\nIT IS ORDERED that complaint counsel's appeal\nfrom the initial decision of the Administrative Law\nJudge be, and it hereby is, denied\nIT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the initial decision\nof the Administrative Law Judge be, and it hereby is,\nadopted as the decision of the Commission.\nIT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint in the\ncaptioned matter be, and it hereby is, dismissed.\nBy the Commission, Commissioner Jones dissenting.\nSEAL\nSecretary\nISSUED: October 5, 1973\nATTACHMENT: Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Jones.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/szyj0226\n\nQuestion: Who is the secretary?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Charles A. Tobin",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
756
|
who is the chairman of the council on children, media and merchandising?
|
Robert Choate
|
Page 7
Nutrition Action
1755 S Street, N.W. . Washington, D.C. 20009
(202) 332-9110
November 4, 1977
Freedom of Information Office
Food and Drug Administration
5600 Fishers Lane
Room 4-62
Rockville, MD 20857
Dear Officer,
Please send a copy of a letter of August 30, 1977 from Commissioner
Kennedy to Robert Choate, chairman of the Council on Children, Media
and Merchandising referred to on page 58 of the September 5, 1977 issue
of Food Chemical News. The letter was written in response to a July 11
letter of Choate to Kennedy.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
HF - 1
Bonnie Liebman
F71- 2091
RECEIVED
NOV 8 1977
FDA PUBLIC RECORDS AND
DOCUMENTS CENTER (HFC-18)
a project of Center for Science in the Public Interest
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mgpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 404,
"image": "mgpj0226_7.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mgpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "7"
}
| 258
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 7\nNutrition Action\n1755 S Street, N.W. . Washington, D.C. 20009\n(202) 332-9110\nNovember 4, 1977\nFreedom of Information Office\nFood and Drug Administration\n5600 Fishers Lane\nRoom 4-62\nRockville, MD 20857\nDear Officer,\nPlease send a copy of a letter of August 30, 1977 from Commissioner\nKennedy to Robert Choate, chairman of the Council on Children, Media\nand Merchandising referred to on page 58 of the September 5, 1977 issue\nof Food Chemical News. The letter was written in response to a July 11\nletter of Choate to Kennedy.\nThank you.\nSincerely,\nHF - 1\nBonnie Liebman\nF71- 2091\nRECEIVED\nNOV 8 1977\nFDA PUBLIC RECORDS AND\nDOCUMENTS CENTER (HFC-18)\na project of Center for Science in the Public Interest\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mgpj0226\n\nQuestion: who is the chairman of the council on children, media and merchandising?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Robert Choate",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
757
|
What is the name of the office mentioned in the letter?
|
Freedom of information office
|
Page 7
Nutrition Action
1755 S Street, N.W. . Washington, D.C. 20009
(202) 332-9110
November 4, 1977
Freedom of Information Office
Food and Drug Administration
5600 Fishers Lane
Room 4-62
Rockville, MD 20857
Dear Officer,
Please send a copy of a letter of August 30, 1977 from Commissioner
Kennedy to Robert Choate, chairman of the Council on Children, Media
and Merchandising referred to on page 58 of the September 5, 1977 issue
of Food Chemical News. The letter was written in response to a July 11
letter of Choate to Kennedy.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
HF - 1
Bonnie Liebman
F71- 2091
RECEIVED
NOV 8 1977
FDA PUBLIC RECORDS AND
DOCUMENTS CENTER (HFC-18)
a project of Center for Science in the Public Interest
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mgpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 404,
"image": "mgpj0226_7.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mgpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "7"
}
| 255
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 7\nNutrition Action\n1755 S Street, N.W. . Washington, D.C. 20009\n(202) 332-9110\nNovember 4, 1977\nFreedom of Information Office\nFood and Drug Administration\n5600 Fishers Lane\nRoom 4-62\nRockville, MD 20857\nDear Officer,\nPlease send a copy of a letter of August 30, 1977 from Commissioner\nKennedy to Robert Choate, chairman of the Council on Children, Media\nand Merchandising referred to on page 58 of the September 5, 1977 issue\nof Food Chemical News. The letter was written in response to a July 11\nletter of Choate to Kennedy.\nThank you.\nSincerely,\nHF - 1\nBonnie Liebman\nF71- 2091\nRECEIVED\nNOV 8 1977\nFDA PUBLIC RECORDS AND\nDOCUMENTS CENTER (HFC-18)\na project of Center for Science in the Public Interest\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mgpj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the name of the office mentioned in the letter?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Freedom of information office",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
758
|
who has signed the letter?
|
Bonnie Liebman
|
Page 7
Nutrition Action
1755 S Street, N.W. . Washington, D.C. 20009
(202) 332-9110
November 4, 1977
Freedom of Information Office
Food and Drug Administration
5600 Fishers Lane
Room 4-62
Rockville, MD 20857
Dear Officer,
Please send a copy of a letter of August 30, 1977 from Commissioner
Kennedy to Robert Choate, chairman of the Council on Children, Media
and Merchandising referred to on page 58 of the September 5, 1977 issue
of Food Chemical News. The letter was written in response to a July 11
letter of Choate to Kennedy.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
HF - 1
Bonnie Liebman
F71- 2091
RECEIVED
NOV 8 1977
FDA PUBLIC RECORDS AND
DOCUMENTS CENTER (HFC-18)
a project of Center for Science in the Public Interest
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mgpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 404,
"image": "mgpj0226_7.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mgpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "7"
}
| 250
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 7\nNutrition Action\n1755 S Street, N.W. . Washington, D.C. 20009\n(202) 332-9110\nNovember 4, 1977\nFreedom of Information Office\nFood and Drug Administration\n5600 Fishers Lane\nRoom 4-62\nRockville, MD 20857\nDear Officer,\nPlease send a copy of a letter of August 30, 1977 from Commissioner\nKennedy to Robert Choate, chairman of the Council on Children, Media\nand Merchandising referred to on page 58 of the September 5, 1977 issue\nof Food Chemical News. The letter was written in response to a July 11\nletter of Choate to Kennedy.\nThank you.\nSincerely,\nHF - 1\nBonnie Liebman\nF71- 2091\nRECEIVED\nNOV 8 1977\nFDA PUBLIC RECORDS AND\nDOCUMENTS CENTER (HFC-18)\na project of Center for Science in the Public Interest\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mgpj0226\n\nQuestion: who has signed the letter?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Bonnie Liebman",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
759
|
what is the heading of the document?
|
Nutrition action
|
Page 7
Nutrition Action
1755 S Street, N.W. . Washington, D.C. 20009
(202) 332-9110
November 4, 1977
Freedom of Information Office
Food and Drug Administration
5600 Fishers Lane
Room 4-62
Rockville, MD 20857
Dear Officer,
Please send a copy of a letter of August 30, 1977 from Commissioner
Kennedy to Robert Choate, chairman of the Council on Children, Media
and Merchandising referred to on page 58 of the September 5, 1977 issue
of Food Chemical News. The letter was written in response to a July 11
letter of Choate to Kennedy.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
HF - 1
Bonnie Liebman
F71- 2091
RECEIVED
NOV 8 1977
FDA PUBLIC RECORDS AND
DOCUMENTS CENTER (HFC-18)
a project of Center for Science in the Public Interest
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mgpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 404,
"image": "mgpj0226_7.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mgpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "7"
}
| 250
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 7\nNutrition Action\n1755 S Street, N.W. . Washington, D.C. 20009\n(202) 332-9110\nNovember 4, 1977\nFreedom of Information Office\nFood and Drug Administration\n5600 Fishers Lane\nRoom 4-62\nRockville, MD 20857\nDear Officer,\nPlease send a copy of a letter of August 30, 1977 from Commissioner\nKennedy to Robert Choate, chairman of the Council on Children, Media\nand Merchandising referred to on page 58 of the September 5, 1977 issue\nof Food Chemical News. The letter was written in response to a July 11\nletter of Choate to Kennedy.\nThank you.\nSincerely,\nHF - 1\nBonnie Liebman\nF71- 2091\nRECEIVED\nNOV 8 1977\nFDA PUBLIC RECORDS AND\nDOCUMENTS CENTER (HFC-18)\na project of Center for Science in the Public Interest\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mgpj0226\n\nQuestion: what is the heading of the document?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Nutrition action",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
762
|
By whom a great deal of advertising is produced locally?
|
bottlers,
|
Page 2
Mr. Michael F. Jacobson
Page 2
September 8, 1972
We have no knowledge of this particular commercial, nor can
we find any record of it in our files of commercials written
for local bottlers.
A great deal of advertising is produced locally by bottlers,
and, of course, we would have no record of this material.
Please let me know if you need any additional information.
Sincerely,
Sidney B. McAllister
SBMcA/ dd
Attachments
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzyj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 406,
"image": "rzyj0226_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rzyj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 148
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nMr. Michael F. Jacobson\nPage 2\nSeptember 8, 1972\nWe have no knowledge of this particular commercial, nor can\nwe find any record of it in our files of commercials written\nfor local bottlers.\nA great deal of advertising is produced locally by bottlers,\nand, of course, we would have no record of this material.\nPlease let me know if you need any additional information.\nSincerely,\nSidney B. McAllister\nSBMcA/ dd\nAttachments\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzyj0226\n\nQuestion: By whom a great deal of advertising is produced locally?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "bottlers,",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
765
|
who began voluntarily listing Yello #5 on its labels well before the FDA required
|
Pepsi-Cola Company
|
Page 9
FOOD COLORING -- 2
Food Coloring and Health
Recently, questions have been raised about the relationship of all food
additives to hyperactivity (hyperkinesis ) in children.
The National Institute for Health, the American Council on Science and
Health, and the Nutrition Foundation reviewed studies in which hyperactive
children were placed on additive-free diets. The children showed no
substantial behavioral change when food coloring was removed from their
diets. It would appear that there is no proven relationship between food
coloring and hyperkinesis.
A minor, but real, health effect of Yellow Dye #5 is a mild hypersensitivity
experienced by a small group of individuals sensitive to this substance.
Food and drinks containing tartrazine are so labeled. Pepsi-Cola Company
began voluntarily listing Yellow #5 on its labels well before the FDA
required it to alert those with this sensitivity to its presence in Mountain
Dew.
Artificial Versus Natural Coloring
It is a federal labeling requirement that any ingredient used to color a
food product--whether derived from a natural source or synthetically
produced--is to be declared an "artificial color." Therefore, "artificial
color" only fulfills federal labeling requirements and has no bearing on
whether it is a natural or artificial substance.
For Additional Information:
Committee on Food Protection, Food and Nutrition Board, Division of Biology
and Agriculture, National Research Council. Food Colors. National Academy
of Sciences, Washington, DC 1971.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hjpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 407,
"image": "hjpj0226_9.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "hjpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "9"
}
| 357
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 9\nFOOD COLORING -- 2\nFood Coloring and Health\nRecently, questions have been raised about the relationship of all food\nadditives to hyperactivity (hyperkinesis ) in children.\nThe National Institute for Health, the American Council on Science and\nHealth, and the Nutrition Foundation reviewed studies in which hyperactive\nchildren were placed on additive-free diets. The children showed no\nsubstantial behavioral change when food coloring was removed from their\ndiets. It would appear that there is no proven relationship between food\ncoloring and hyperkinesis.\nA minor, but real, health effect of Yellow Dye #5 is a mild hypersensitivity\nexperienced by a small group of individuals sensitive to this substance.\nFood and drinks containing tartrazine are so labeled. Pepsi-Cola Company\nbegan voluntarily listing Yellow #5 on its labels well before the FDA\nrequired it to alert those with this sensitivity to its presence in Mountain\nDew.\nArtificial Versus Natural Coloring\nIt is a federal labeling requirement that any ingredient used to color a\nfood product--whether derived from a natural source or synthetically\nproduced--is to be declared an \"artificial color.\" Therefore, \"artificial\ncolor\" only fulfills federal labeling requirements and has no bearing on\nwhether it is a natural or artificial substance.\nFor Additional Information:\nCommittee on Food Protection, Food and Nutrition Board, Division of Biology\nand Agriculture, National Research Council. Food Colors. National Academy\nof Sciences, Washington, DC 1971.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hjpj0226\n\nQuestion: who began voluntarily listing Yello #5 on its labels well before the FDA required",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Pepsi-Cola Company",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
766
|
artificial colour only fulfils whose labelling requirements
|
federal labeling requirements
|
Page 9
FOOD COLORING -- 2
Food Coloring and Health
Recently, questions have been raised about the relationship of all food
additives to hyperactivity (hyperkinesis ) in children.
The National Institute for Health, the American Council on Science and
Health, and the Nutrition Foundation reviewed studies in which hyperactive
children were placed on additive-free diets. The children showed no
substantial behavioral change when food coloring was removed from their
diets. It would appear that there is no proven relationship between food
coloring and hyperkinesis.
A minor, but real, health effect of Yellow Dye #5 is a mild hypersensitivity
experienced by a small group of individuals sensitive to this substance.
Food and drinks containing tartrazine are so labeled. Pepsi-Cola Company
began voluntarily listing Yellow #5 on its labels well before the FDA
required it to alert those with this sensitivity to its presence in Mountain
Dew.
Artificial Versus Natural Coloring
It is a federal labeling requirement that any ingredient used to color a
food product--whether derived from a natural source or synthetically
produced--is to be declared an "artificial color." Therefore, "artificial
color" only fulfills federal labeling requirements and has no bearing on
whether it is a natural or artificial substance.
For Additional Information:
Committee on Food Protection, Food and Nutrition Board, Division of Biology
and Agriculture, National Research Council. Food Colors. National Academy
of Sciences, Washington, DC 1971.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hjpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 407,
"image": "hjpj0226_9.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "hjpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "9"
}
| 350
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 9\nFOOD COLORING -- 2\nFood Coloring and Health\nRecently, questions have been raised about the relationship of all food\nadditives to hyperactivity (hyperkinesis ) in children.\nThe National Institute for Health, the American Council on Science and\nHealth, and the Nutrition Foundation reviewed studies in which hyperactive\nchildren were placed on additive-free diets. The children showed no\nsubstantial behavioral change when food coloring was removed from their\ndiets. It would appear that there is no proven relationship between food\ncoloring and hyperkinesis.\nA minor, but real, health effect of Yellow Dye #5 is a mild hypersensitivity\nexperienced by a small group of individuals sensitive to this substance.\nFood and drinks containing tartrazine are so labeled. Pepsi-Cola Company\nbegan voluntarily listing Yellow #5 on its labels well before the FDA\nrequired it to alert those with this sensitivity to its presence in Mountain\nDew.\nArtificial Versus Natural Coloring\nIt is a federal labeling requirement that any ingredient used to color a\nfood product--whether derived from a natural source or synthetically\nproduced--is to be declared an \"artificial color.\" Therefore, \"artificial\ncolor\" only fulfills federal labeling requirements and has no bearing on\nwhether it is a natural or artificial substance.\nFor Additional Information:\nCommittee on Food Protection, Food and Nutrition Board, Division of Biology\nand Agriculture, National Research Council. Food Colors. National Academy\nof Sciences, Washington, DC 1971.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hjpj0226\n\nQuestion: artificial colour only fulfils whose labelling requirements",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "federal labeling requirements",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
768
|
what was removed from the diets of hyperactive children as part of the study?
|
food coloring
|
Page 9
FOOD COLORING -- 2
Food Coloring and Health
Recently, questions have been raised about the relationship of all food
additives to hyperactivity (hyperkinesis ) in children.
The National Institute for Health, the American Council on Science and
Health, and the Nutrition Foundation reviewed studies in which hyperactive
children were placed on additive-free diets. The children showed no
substantial behavioral change when food coloring was removed from their
diets. It would appear that there is no proven relationship between food
coloring and hyperkinesis.
A minor, but real, health effect of Yellow Dye #5 is a mild hypersensitivity
experienced by a small group of individuals sensitive to this substance.
Food and drinks containing tartrazine are so labeled. Pepsi-Cola Company
began voluntarily listing Yellow #5 on its labels well before the FDA
required it to alert those with this sensitivity to its presence in Mountain
Dew.
Artificial Versus Natural Coloring
It is a federal labeling requirement that any ingredient used to color a
food product--whether derived from a natural source or synthetically
produced--is to be declared an "artificial color." Therefore, "artificial
color" only fulfills federal labeling requirements and has no bearing on
whether it is a natural or artificial substance.
For Additional Information:
Committee on Food Protection, Food and Nutrition Board, Division of Biology
and Agriculture, National Research Council. Food Colors. National Academy
of Sciences, Washington, DC 1971.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hjpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 407,
"image": "hjpj0226_9.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "hjpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "9"
}
| 354
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 9\nFOOD COLORING -- 2\nFood Coloring and Health\nRecently, questions have been raised about the relationship of all food\nadditives to hyperactivity (hyperkinesis ) in children.\nThe National Institute for Health, the American Council on Science and\nHealth, and the Nutrition Foundation reviewed studies in which hyperactive\nchildren were placed on additive-free diets. The children showed no\nsubstantial behavioral change when food coloring was removed from their\ndiets. It would appear that there is no proven relationship between food\ncoloring and hyperkinesis.\nA minor, but real, health effect of Yellow Dye #5 is a mild hypersensitivity\nexperienced by a small group of individuals sensitive to this substance.\nFood and drinks containing tartrazine are so labeled. Pepsi-Cola Company\nbegan voluntarily listing Yellow #5 on its labels well before the FDA\nrequired it to alert those with this sensitivity to its presence in Mountain\nDew.\nArtificial Versus Natural Coloring\nIt is a federal labeling requirement that any ingredient used to color a\nfood product--whether derived from a natural source or synthetically\nproduced--is to be declared an \"artificial color.\" Therefore, \"artificial\ncolor\" only fulfills federal labeling requirements and has no bearing on\nwhether it is a natural or artificial substance.\nFor Additional Information:\nCommittee on Food Protection, Food and Nutrition Board, Division of Biology\nand Agriculture, National Research Council. Food Colors. National Academy\nof Sciences, Washington, DC 1971.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hjpj0226\n\nQuestion: what was removed from the diets of hyperactive children as part of the study?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "food coloring",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
770
|
what sort of certification is this
|
Certification of Translation
|
Page 4
ils
INTERNATIONAL
LITIGATION
SERVICES
CERTIFICATION OF TRANSLATION
International Litigation Services, a company specializing in international cases and foreign language
document processing, certifies the following:
International Litigation Services has retained a professional translator for the attached Japanese
into English document. The document is referred to as:
"TAK-SATOKE-00091272P-0001"
I affirm that such translation has been prepared by a duly qualified translator, who has confirmed
that such translation is, to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, a true and accurate
translation in English of the corresponding Japanese document.
I declare under the penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct, Notwithstanding the
foregoing affirmations, no liability is assumed for errors and omissions in the translation of the
attached document.
Executed on this 27th day of August 2013, in Aliso Viejo, California.
Joseph thorpe
Joseph Thorpe
Managing Director
International Litigation Services, Inc.
International Urination Services, Ine, . 65 Enterprise . Aliso Viejo, California 92656
Phone: 288 313 4457 s Fax: 213.674.4191 & [email protected] . www.TEAM.com
NEW YORK . LOS ANGELES . LAS VEGAS . ORANGE COUNTY
Source: https://www.indup372cooouts.ucsf.edu/docs/qpjf0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 626,
"image": "qpjf0226_4.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "qpjf0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "4"
}
| 323
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 4\nils\nINTERNATIONAL\nLITIGATION\nSERVICES\nCERTIFICATION OF TRANSLATION\nInternational Litigation Services, a company specializing in international cases and foreign language\ndocument processing, certifies the following:\nInternational Litigation Services has retained a professional translator for the attached Japanese\ninto English document. The document is referred to as:\n\"TAK-SATOKE-00091272P-0001\"\nI affirm that such translation has been prepared by a duly qualified translator, who has confirmed\nthat such translation is, to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, a true and accurate\ntranslation in English of the corresponding Japanese document.\nI declare under the penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct, Notwithstanding the\nforegoing affirmations, no liability is assumed for errors and omissions in the translation of the\nattached document.\nExecuted on this 27th day of August 2013, in Aliso Viejo, California.\nJoseph thorpe\nJoseph Thorpe\nManaging Director\nInternational Litigation Services, Inc.\nInternational Urination Services, Ine, . 65 Enterprise . Aliso Viejo, California 92656\nPhone: 288 313 4457 s Fax: 213.674.4191 & [email protected] . www.TEAM.com\nNEW YORK . LOS ANGELES . LAS VEGAS . ORANGE COUNTY\nSource: https://www.indup372cooouts.ucsf.edu/docs/qpjf0226\n\nQuestion: what sort of certification is this",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Certification of Translation",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
771
|
What is the specialization of international litigation services?
|
international cases and foreign language document processing
|
Page 4
ils
INTERNATIONAL
LITIGATION
SERVICES
CERTIFICATION OF TRANSLATION
International Litigation Services, a company specializing in international cases and foreign language
document processing, certifies the following:
International Litigation Services has retained a professional translator for the attached Japanese
into English document. The document is referred to as:
"TAK-SATOKE-00091272P-0001"
I affirm that such translation has been prepared by a duly qualified translator, who has confirmed
that such translation is, to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, a true and accurate
translation in English of the corresponding Japanese document.
I declare under the penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct, Notwithstanding the
foregoing affirmations, no liability is assumed for errors and omissions in the translation of the
attached document.
Executed on this 27th day of August 2013, in Aliso Viejo, California.
Joseph thorpe
Joseph Thorpe
Managing Director
International Litigation Services, Inc.
International Urination Services, Ine, . 65 Enterprise . Aliso Viejo, California 92656
Phone: 288 313 4457 s Fax: 213.674.4191 & [email protected] . www.TEAM.com
NEW YORK . LOS ANGELES . LAS VEGAS . ORANGE COUNTY
Source: https://www.indup372cooouts.ucsf.edu/docs/qpjf0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 626,
"image": "qpjf0226_4.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "qpjf0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "4"
}
| 330
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 4\nils\nINTERNATIONAL\nLITIGATION\nSERVICES\nCERTIFICATION OF TRANSLATION\nInternational Litigation Services, a company specializing in international cases and foreign language\ndocument processing, certifies the following:\nInternational Litigation Services has retained a professional translator for the attached Japanese\ninto English document. The document is referred to as:\n\"TAK-SATOKE-00091272P-0001\"\nI affirm that such translation has been prepared by a duly qualified translator, who has confirmed\nthat such translation is, to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, a true and accurate\ntranslation in English of the corresponding Japanese document.\nI declare under the penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct, Notwithstanding the\nforegoing affirmations, no liability is assumed for errors and omissions in the translation of the\nattached document.\nExecuted on this 27th day of August 2013, in Aliso Viejo, California.\nJoseph thorpe\nJoseph Thorpe\nManaging Director\nInternational Litigation Services, Inc.\nInternational Urination Services, Ine, . 65 Enterprise . Aliso Viejo, California 92656\nPhone: 288 313 4457 s Fax: 213.674.4191 & [email protected] . www.TEAM.com\nNEW YORK . LOS ANGELES . LAS VEGAS . ORANGE COUNTY\nSource: https://www.indup372cooouts.ucsf.edu/docs/qpjf0226\n\nQuestion: What is the specialization of international litigation services?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "international cases and foreign language document processing",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
772
|
when is this executed on
|
27th day of August 2013
|
Page 4
ils
INTERNATIONAL
LITIGATION
SERVICES
CERTIFICATION OF TRANSLATION
International Litigation Services, a company specializing in international cases and foreign language
document processing, certifies the following:
International Litigation Services has retained a professional translator for the attached Japanese
into English document. The document is referred to as:
"TAK-SATOKE-00091272P-0001"
I affirm that such translation has been prepared by a duly qualified translator, who has confirmed
that such translation is, to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, a true and accurate
translation in English of the corresponding Japanese document.
I declare under the penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct, Notwithstanding the
foregoing affirmations, no liability is assumed for errors and omissions in the translation of the
attached document.
Executed on this 27th day of August 2013, in Aliso Viejo, California.
Joseph thorpe
Joseph Thorpe
Managing Director
International Litigation Services, Inc.
International Urination Services, Ine, . 65 Enterprise . Aliso Viejo, California 92656
Phone: 288 313 4457 s Fax: 213.674.4191 & [email protected] . www.TEAM.com
NEW YORK . LOS ANGELES . LAS VEGAS . ORANGE COUNTY
Source: https://www.indup372cooouts.ucsf.edu/docs/qpjf0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 626,
"image": "qpjf0226_4.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "qpjf0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "4"
}
| 326
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 4\nils\nINTERNATIONAL\nLITIGATION\nSERVICES\nCERTIFICATION OF TRANSLATION\nInternational Litigation Services, a company specializing in international cases and foreign language\ndocument processing, certifies the following:\nInternational Litigation Services has retained a professional translator for the attached Japanese\ninto English document. The document is referred to as:\n\"TAK-SATOKE-00091272P-0001\"\nI affirm that such translation has been prepared by a duly qualified translator, who has confirmed\nthat such translation is, to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, a true and accurate\ntranslation in English of the corresponding Japanese document.\nI declare under the penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct, Notwithstanding the\nforegoing affirmations, no liability is assumed for errors and omissions in the translation of the\nattached document.\nExecuted on this 27th day of August 2013, in Aliso Viejo, California.\nJoseph thorpe\nJoseph Thorpe\nManaging Director\nInternational Litigation Services, Inc.\nInternational Urination Services, Ine, . 65 Enterprise . Aliso Viejo, California 92656\nPhone: 288 313 4457 s Fax: 213.674.4191 & [email protected] . www.TEAM.com\nNEW YORK . LOS ANGELES . LAS VEGAS . ORANGE COUNTY\nSource: https://www.indup372cooouts.ucsf.edu/docs/qpjf0226\n\nQuestion: when is this executed on",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "27th day of August 2013",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
773
|
who is the managing director of international litigation services
|
Joseph Thorpe
|
Page 4
ils
INTERNATIONAL
LITIGATION
SERVICES
CERTIFICATION OF TRANSLATION
International Litigation Services, a company specializing in international cases and foreign language
document processing, certifies the following:
International Litigation Services has retained a professional translator for the attached Japanese
into English document. The document is referred to as:
"TAK-SATOKE-00091272P-0001"
I affirm that such translation has been prepared by a duly qualified translator, who has confirmed
that such translation is, to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, a true and accurate
translation in English of the corresponding Japanese document.
I declare under the penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct, Notwithstanding the
foregoing affirmations, no liability is assumed for errors and omissions in the translation of the
attached document.
Executed on this 27th day of August 2013, in Aliso Viejo, California.
Joseph thorpe
Joseph Thorpe
Managing Director
International Litigation Services, Inc.
International Urination Services, Ine, . 65 Enterprise . Aliso Viejo, California 92656
Phone: 288 313 4457 s Fax: 213.674.4191 & [email protected] . www.TEAM.com
NEW YORK . LOS ANGELES . LAS VEGAS . ORANGE COUNTY
Source: https://www.indup372cooouts.ucsf.edu/docs/qpjf0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 626,
"image": "qpjf0226_4.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "qpjf0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "4"
}
| 325
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 4\nils\nINTERNATIONAL\nLITIGATION\nSERVICES\nCERTIFICATION OF TRANSLATION\nInternational Litigation Services, a company specializing in international cases and foreign language\ndocument processing, certifies the following:\nInternational Litigation Services has retained a professional translator for the attached Japanese\ninto English document. The document is referred to as:\n\"TAK-SATOKE-00091272P-0001\"\nI affirm that such translation has been prepared by a duly qualified translator, who has confirmed\nthat such translation is, to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, a true and accurate\ntranslation in English of the corresponding Japanese document.\nI declare under the penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct, Notwithstanding the\nforegoing affirmations, no liability is assumed for errors and omissions in the translation of the\nattached document.\nExecuted on this 27th day of August 2013, in Aliso Viejo, California.\nJoseph thorpe\nJoseph Thorpe\nManaging Director\nInternational Litigation Services, Inc.\nInternational Urination Services, Ine, . 65 Enterprise . Aliso Viejo, California 92656\nPhone: 288 313 4457 s Fax: 213.674.4191 & [email protected] . www.TEAM.com\nNEW YORK . LOS ANGELES . LAS VEGAS . ORANGE COUNTY\nSource: https://www.indup372cooouts.ucsf.edu/docs/qpjf0226\n\nQuestion: who is the managing director of international litigation services",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Joseph Thorpe",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
775
|
who conducted pivotal studies
|
Takeda
|
Page 2
ACTOS FDA Response Strategy
1.0: INTRODUCTION
VVY
>Restate questions from FDA
Raise feasibility issues - theoretical versus clinical questions
Summarize assessment and action plan around each question
Frame response as risk/benefit assessment of Actos clinical program (Frame broadly)
2.0: NONCLINICAL
Key Messages:
Pivotal studies conducted by Takeda followed GLP's versus anecdotally reported
promoter model studies, which did not.
Rat findings not duplicated in mouse, monkey, or dog. Therefore, the findings
appear to be species specific and not relevant to humans (Rat studies - females had
benign tumors only)
Clinical and post-marketing data to date shows a very low incidence of bladder
cancer and strengthens argument that rat findings are species specific.
Supporting arguments
>Question source of pioglitazone used by Novo Nordisk
Examine bladder concentrations in rodent studies
3.0; PPAR MECHANISM
Key Points:
Revalidate Sam Cohen's original hypothesis 1996, using 1999 EMEA argument for
support
Background on PPARs
>Dual versus gamma versus alpha
Structure
>Mechanism of action, in particular urinary tract tumorigenesis
Promoter models
> Application of model to standard acceptable GLP models
NN622
Compare/contrast structure of pioglitazone to NN622
Determine correlation between fibrates and bladder cancer (Section 6.0?)
Determine correlation between PPAR-alpha agonists and bladder cancer (Section 6.0?)
Argument will answer FDA's theoretical hypotheses with facts
4.0: CLINICAL
Key Message:
Epidemiological evaluations strongly indicate that there is no increased risk of
bladder cancer associated with pioglitazone. Frequency of bladder cancer incidents
in ACTOS trials is in line with the frequency observed in the general population.
Monitoring is not possible because it in unreliable (not sensitive enough, many false
positives). There may also be ethical and logistic issues.
Supporting arguments
> Forms of monitoring done [US (011,031), EU, IP (OCT020)], investigate what
worked/what didn't without invalidating what was done
Additional assessments of data - Searching current clinical and post-marketing databases
Last revision: August 7, 2002
Confidential - Subject to Protective Order
TAK-RAMSTM-00236226
Produced in MDL on 09/18/12
Source: https://www.indupbodgroboots.ucsf.edu/docs/yljf0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 634,
"image": "yljf0226_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "yljf0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 559
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nACTOS FDA Response Strategy\n1.0: INTRODUCTION\nVVY\n>Restate questions from FDA\nRaise feasibility issues - theoretical versus clinical questions\nSummarize assessment and action plan around each question\nFrame response as risk/benefit assessment of Actos clinical program (Frame broadly)\n2.0: NONCLINICAL\nKey Messages:\nPivotal studies conducted by Takeda followed GLP's versus anecdotally reported\npromoter model studies, which did not.\nRat findings not duplicated in mouse, monkey, or dog. Therefore, the findings\nappear to be species specific and not relevant to humans (Rat studies - females had\nbenign tumors only)\nClinical and post-marketing data to date shows a very low incidence of bladder\ncancer and strengthens argument that rat findings are species specific.\nSupporting arguments\n>Question source of pioglitazone used by Novo Nordisk\nExamine bladder concentrations in rodent studies\n3.0; PPAR MECHANISM\nKey Points:\nRevalidate Sam Cohen's original hypothesis 1996, using 1999 EMEA argument for\nsupport\nBackground on PPARs\n>Dual versus gamma versus alpha\nStructure\n>Mechanism of action, in particular urinary tract tumorigenesis\nPromoter models\n> Application of model to standard acceptable GLP models\nNN622\nCompare/contrast structure of pioglitazone to NN622\nDetermine correlation between fibrates and bladder cancer (Section 6.0?)\nDetermine correlation between PPAR-alpha agonists and bladder cancer (Section 6.0?)\nArgument will answer FDA's theoretical hypotheses with facts\n4.0: CLINICAL\nKey Message:\nEpidemiological evaluations strongly indicate that there is no increased risk of\nbladder cancer associated with pioglitazone. Frequency of bladder cancer incidents\nin ACTOS trials is in line with the frequency observed in the general population.\nMonitoring is not possible because it in unreliable (not sensitive enough, many false\npositives). There may also be ethical and logistic issues.\nSupporting arguments\n> Forms of monitoring done [US (011,031), EU, IP (OCT020)], investigate what\nworked/what didn't without invalidating what was done\nAdditional assessments of data - Searching current clinical and post-marketing databases\nLast revision: August 7, 2002\nConfidential - Subject to Protective Order\nTAK-RAMSTM-00236226\nProduced in MDL on 09/18/12\nSource: https://www.indupbodgroboots.ucsf.edu/docs/yljf0226\n\nQuestion: who conducted pivotal studies",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Takeda",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
776
|
What findings are not duplicated in mouse, monkey, or dog?
|
Rat Findings
|
Page 2
ACTOS FDA Response Strategy
1.0: INTRODUCTION
VVY
>Restate questions from FDA
Raise feasibility issues - theoretical versus clinical questions
Summarize assessment and action plan around each question
Frame response as risk/benefit assessment of Actos clinical program (Frame broadly)
2.0: NONCLINICAL
Key Messages:
Pivotal studies conducted by Takeda followed GLP's versus anecdotally reported
promoter model studies, which did not.
Rat findings not duplicated in mouse, monkey, or dog. Therefore, the findings
appear to be species specific and not relevant to humans (Rat studies - females had
benign tumors only)
Clinical and post-marketing data to date shows a very low incidence of bladder
cancer and strengthens argument that rat findings are species specific.
Supporting arguments
>Question source of pioglitazone used by Novo Nordisk
Examine bladder concentrations in rodent studies
3.0; PPAR MECHANISM
Key Points:
Revalidate Sam Cohen's original hypothesis 1996, using 1999 EMEA argument for
support
Background on PPARs
>Dual versus gamma versus alpha
Structure
>Mechanism of action, in particular urinary tract tumorigenesis
Promoter models
> Application of model to standard acceptable GLP models
NN622
Compare/contrast structure of pioglitazone to NN622
Determine correlation between fibrates and bladder cancer (Section 6.0?)
Determine correlation between PPAR-alpha agonists and bladder cancer (Section 6.0?)
Argument will answer FDA's theoretical hypotheses with facts
4.0: CLINICAL
Key Message:
Epidemiological evaluations strongly indicate that there is no increased risk of
bladder cancer associated with pioglitazone. Frequency of bladder cancer incidents
in ACTOS trials is in line with the frequency observed in the general population.
Monitoring is not possible because it in unreliable (not sensitive enough, many false
positives). There may also be ethical and logistic issues.
Supporting arguments
> Forms of monitoring done [US (011,031), EU, IP (OCT020)], investigate what
worked/what didn't without invalidating what was done
Additional assessments of data - Searching current clinical and post-marketing databases
Last revision: August 7, 2002
Confidential - Subject to Protective Order
TAK-RAMSTM-00236226
Produced in MDL on 09/18/12
Source: https://www.indupbodgroboots.ucsf.edu/docs/yljf0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 634,
"image": "yljf0226_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "yljf0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 569
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nACTOS FDA Response Strategy\n1.0: INTRODUCTION\nVVY\n>Restate questions from FDA\nRaise feasibility issues - theoretical versus clinical questions\nSummarize assessment and action plan around each question\nFrame response as risk/benefit assessment of Actos clinical program (Frame broadly)\n2.0: NONCLINICAL\nKey Messages:\nPivotal studies conducted by Takeda followed GLP's versus anecdotally reported\npromoter model studies, which did not.\nRat findings not duplicated in mouse, monkey, or dog. Therefore, the findings\nappear to be species specific and not relevant to humans (Rat studies - females had\nbenign tumors only)\nClinical and post-marketing data to date shows a very low incidence of bladder\ncancer and strengthens argument that rat findings are species specific.\nSupporting arguments\n>Question source of pioglitazone used by Novo Nordisk\nExamine bladder concentrations in rodent studies\n3.0; PPAR MECHANISM\nKey Points:\nRevalidate Sam Cohen's original hypothesis 1996, using 1999 EMEA argument for\nsupport\nBackground on PPARs\n>Dual versus gamma versus alpha\nStructure\n>Mechanism of action, in particular urinary tract tumorigenesis\nPromoter models\n> Application of model to standard acceptable GLP models\nNN622\nCompare/contrast structure of pioglitazone to NN622\nDetermine correlation between fibrates and bladder cancer (Section 6.0?)\nDetermine correlation between PPAR-alpha agonists and bladder cancer (Section 6.0?)\nArgument will answer FDA's theoretical hypotheses with facts\n4.0: CLINICAL\nKey Message:\nEpidemiological evaluations strongly indicate that there is no increased risk of\nbladder cancer associated with pioglitazone. Frequency of bladder cancer incidents\nin ACTOS trials is in line with the frequency observed in the general population.\nMonitoring is not possible because it in unreliable (not sensitive enough, many false\npositives). There may also be ethical and logistic issues.\nSupporting arguments\n> Forms of monitoring done [US (011,031), EU, IP (OCT020)], investigate what\nworked/what didn't without invalidating what was done\nAdditional assessments of data - Searching current clinical and post-marketing databases\nLast revision: August 7, 2002\nConfidential - Subject to Protective Order\nTAK-RAMSTM-00236226\nProduced in MDL on 09/18/12\nSource: https://www.indupbodgroboots.ucsf.edu/docs/yljf0226\n\nQuestion: What findings are not duplicated in mouse, monkey, or dog?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Rat Findings",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
778
|
quantity of the product code 15102
|
1
|
Page 1
TRANSACTION
PRODUCT_C
LOT NUMBE
DATE
HCP_NAME
ODE
PRODUCT DESCRIPTION
R
QUANTITY | REP_NAME
LAMB,
Corraini,
15-Aug-06
ANNA H
15102
ACTOS 15MG 6/7CT BLISTER/SLV C11705
Jeff
LAMB
ACTOPLUSMET 15MG/850MG
Corraini,
15-Aug-06
ANNAH
15841
4/14CT BLSTR/SLV
A11681
Jeff
LAMB,
Corraini,
15-Aug-06
ANNA H
45102
ACTOS 45MG 6/7CT BLISTER/SLV A11654
3
Jeff
LAMB,
ACTOPLUSMET 15MG/500MG
Corraini,
15-Aug-06
ANNA H
15541
4/14CT BLSTR/SLV
A11566
Jeff
LAMB,
ACTOPLUSMET 15MG/500MG
Schlicht,
04-Aug-06
ANNA M
15541
4/14CT BLSTR/SLV
A11677
2
Paul
LAMB
Schlicht,
04-Aug-06
ANNA M
30102
ACTOS 30MG 6/7CT BLISTER/SLV C11794
Paul
LAMB
ACTOPLUSMET 15MG/850MG
Schlicht,
04-Aug-06
ANNA M
15841
4/14CT BLSTR/SLV
A11684
Paul
LAMB
Schlicht,
04-Aug-06
ANNA M
15102
ACTOS 15MG 6/7CT BLISTER/SLV A11718
Paul
LAMB,
Schlicht,
04-Aug-06
ANNA M
45102
ACTOS 45MG 6/7CT BLISTER/SLV A11735
Paul
LAMB,
Schlicht,
22-Aug-06
ANNA M
30102
ACTOS 30MG 6/7CT BLISTER/SLV A11727
Paul
LAMB
ACTOPLUSMET 15MG/500MG
Schlicht,
22-Aug-06
ANNA M
15541
4/14CT BLSTR/SLV
A11677
Paul
LAMB
Schlicht,
22-Aug-06
ANNA M
45102
ACTOS 45MG 6/7CT BLISTER/SLV A11777
Paul
LAMB,
Schlicht,
22-Aug-06
ANNA M
15102
ACTOS 15MG 6/7CT BLISTER/SLV C11791
Paul
LAMB,
ACTOPLUSMET 15MG/850MG
Schlicht,
22-Aug-06
ANNA M
15841
4/14CT BLSTR/SLV
A11684
Paul
LAMB,
Corraini,
08-Sep-06
ANNA M
30102
ACTOS 30MG 6/7CT BLISTER/SLV A11727
Jeff
LAMB,
ACTOPLUSMET 15MG/850MG
Corraini,
08-Sep-06
ANNAM
15841
4/14CT BLSTR/SLV
A11681
Jeff
LAMB,
ACTOPLUSMET 15MG/500MG
Corraini,
08-Sep-06
ANNA M
15541
4/14CT BLSTR/SLV
A11666
Jeff
LAMB,
Corraini,
08-Sep-06
ANNA M
15102
ACTOS 15MG 6/7CT BLISTER/SLV A11766
Jeff
LAMB,
ACTOPLUSMET 15MG/500MG
Schlicht,
13-Sep-06
ANNA M
15541
4/14CT BLSTR/SLV
A11578
Paul
LAMB,
Schlicht,
13-Sep-06
ANNA M
45102
ACTOS 45MG 6/7CT BLISTER/SLV A11777
Paul
LAMB,
Schlicht,
13-Sep-06
ANNA M
30102
ACTOS 30MG 6/7CT BLISTER/SLV A11727
Paul
LAMB
ACTOPLUSMET 15MG/850MG
Schlicht,
13-Sep-06
ANNA M
15841
4/14CT BLSTR/SLV
A11748
Paul
LAMB,
Schlicht
13-Sep-06
ANNA M
15102
ACTOS 15MG 6/7CT BLISTER/SLV C11791
Paul
PENGAD 279 031-6348
EXHIBIT
* 6
P7140-00001
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucst.ecardro
PLA-TAK-00062729
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 638,
"image": "szjf0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "szjf0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 1,064
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nTRANSACTION\nPRODUCT_C\nLOT NUMBE\nDATE\nHCP_NAME\nODE\nPRODUCT DESCRIPTION\nR\nQUANTITY | REP_NAME\nLAMB,\nCorraini,\n15-Aug-06\nANNA H\n15102\nACTOS 15MG 6/7CT BLISTER/SLV C11705\nJeff\nLAMB\nACTOPLUSMET 15MG/850MG\nCorraini,\n15-Aug-06\nANNAH\n15841\n4/14CT BLSTR/SLV\nA11681\nJeff\nLAMB,\nCorraini,\n15-Aug-06\nANNA H\n45102\nACTOS 45MG 6/7CT BLISTER/SLV A11654\n3\nJeff\nLAMB,\nACTOPLUSMET 15MG/500MG\nCorraini,\n15-Aug-06\nANNA H\n15541\n4/14CT BLSTR/SLV\nA11566\nJeff\nLAMB,\nACTOPLUSMET 15MG/500MG\nSchlicht,\n04-Aug-06\nANNA M\n15541\n4/14CT BLSTR/SLV\nA11677\n2\nPaul\nLAMB\nSchlicht,\n04-Aug-06\nANNA M\n30102\nACTOS 30MG 6/7CT BLISTER/SLV C11794\nPaul\nLAMB\nACTOPLUSMET 15MG/850MG\nSchlicht,\n04-Aug-06\nANNA M\n15841\n4/14CT BLSTR/SLV\nA11684\nPaul\nLAMB\nSchlicht,\n04-Aug-06\nANNA M\n15102\nACTOS 15MG 6/7CT BLISTER/SLV A11718\nPaul\nLAMB,\nSchlicht,\n04-Aug-06\nANNA M\n45102\nACTOS 45MG 6/7CT BLISTER/SLV A11735\nPaul\nLAMB,\nSchlicht,\n22-Aug-06\nANNA M\n30102\nACTOS 30MG 6/7CT BLISTER/SLV A11727\nPaul\nLAMB\nACTOPLUSMET 15MG/500MG\nSchlicht,\n22-Aug-06\nANNA M\n15541\n4/14CT BLSTR/SLV\nA11677\nPaul\nLAMB\nSchlicht,\n22-Aug-06\nANNA M\n45102\nACTOS 45MG 6/7CT BLISTER/SLV A11777\nPaul\nLAMB,\nSchlicht,\n22-Aug-06\nANNA M\n15102\nACTOS 15MG 6/7CT BLISTER/SLV C11791\nPaul\nLAMB,\nACTOPLUSMET 15MG/850MG\nSchlicht,\n22-Aug-06\nANNA M\n15841\n4/14CT BLSTR/SLV\nA11684\nPaul\nLAMB,\nCorraini,\n08-Sep-06\nANNA M\n30102\nACTOS 30MG 6/7CT BLISTER/SLV A11727\nJeff\nLAMB,\nACTOPLUSMET 15MG/850MG\nCorraini,\n08-Sep-06\nANNAM\n15841\n4/14CT BLSTR/SLV\nA11681\nJeff\nLAMB,\nACTOPLUSMET 15MG/500MG\nCorraini,\n08-Sep-06\nANNA M\n15541\n4/14CT BLSTR/SLV\nA11666\nJeff\nLAMB,\nCorraini,\n08-Sep-06\nANNA M\n15102\nACTOS 15MG 6/7CT BLISTER/SLV A11766\nJeff\nLAMB,\nACTOPLUSMET 15MG/500MG\nSchlicht,\n13-Sep-06\nANNA M\n15541\n4/14CT BLSTR/SLV\nA11578\nPaul\nLAMB,\nSchlicht,\n13-Sep-06\nANNA M\n45102\nACTOS 45MG 6/7CT BLISTER/SLV A11777\nPaul\nLAMB,\nSchlicht,\n13-Sep-06\nANNA M\n30102\nACTOS 30MG 6/7CT BLISTER/SLV A11727\nPaul\nLAMB\nACTOPLUSMET 15MG/850MG\nSchlicht,\n13-Sep-06\nANNA M\n15841\n4/14CT BLSTR/SLV\nA11748\nPaul\nLAMB,\nSchlicht\n13-Sep-06\nANNA M\n15102\nACTOS 15MG 6/7CT BLISTER/SLV C11791\nPaul\nPENGAD 279 031-6348\nEXHIBIT\n* 6\nP7140-00001\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucst.ecardro\nPLA-TAK-00062729\n\nQuestion: quantity of the product code 15102",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
796
|
what are the greatest sources of caffeine?
|
coffee, tea and chocolate.
|
Page 6
CAFFEINE -- 2
The greatest sources of caffeine are coffee, tea and chocolate. Soft
drinks add little to the average total intake. In 1978, the Federation of
American Societies for Experimental Biology reported to the FDA that most
adults who drank soft drinks actually consumed four to thirteen times more
caffeine from other sources while children received two to four times more
caffeine from other sources.
For consumers who prefer no caffeine in their diets, Pepsi-Cola produces a
number of caffeine-free soft drinks.
For Additional Information:
American Council on Science and Health. The Health Effects of Caffeine.
Summit, NJ, 1983 Jan.
Dews, P.B. "Caffeine." Annual Review of Nutrition 1982. 2:323-341.
Linn, S., et al. "No association between coffee consumption and adverse
outcomes of pregnancy." New England Journal of Medicine 1982.
306( 3) :141-145.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hjpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 411,
"image": "hjpj0226_6.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "hjpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "6"
}
| 245
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 6\nCAFFEINE -- 2\nThe greatest sources of caffeine are coffee, tea and chocolate. Soft\ndrinks add little to the average total intake. In 1978, the Federation of\nAmerican Societies for Experimental Biology reported to the FDA that most\nadults who drank soft drinks actually consumed four to thirteen times more\ncaffeine from other sources while children received two to four times more\ncaffeine from other sources.\nFor consumers who prefer no caffeine in their diets, Pepsi-Cola produces a\nnumber of caffeine-free soft drinks.\nFor Additional Information:\nAmerican Council on Science and Health. The Health Effects of Caffeine.\nSummit, NJ, 1983 Jan.\nDews, P.B. \"Caffeine.\" Annual Review of Nutrition 1982. 2:323-341.\nLinn, S., et al. \"No association between coffee consumption and adverse\noutcomes of pregnancy.\" New England Journal of Medicine 1982.\n306( 3) :141-145.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hjpj0226\n\nQuestion: what are the greatest sources of caffeine?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "coffee, tea and chocolate.",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
797
|
In which year did American Council on Science and Health , published "the health effects of caffeine"?
|
1983
|
Page 6
CAFFEINE -- 2
The greatest sources of caffeine are coffee, tea and chocolate. Soft
drinks add little to the average total intake. In 1978, the Federation of
American Societies for Experimental Biology reported to the FDA that most
adults who drank soft drinks actually consumed four to thirteen times more
caffeine from other sources while children received two to four times more
caffeine from other sources.
For consumers who prefer no caffeine in their diets, Pepsi-Cola produces a
number of caffeine-free soft drinks.
For Additional Information:
American Council on Science and Health. The Health Effects of Caffeine.
Summit, NJ, 1983 Jan.
Dews, P.B. "Caffeine." Annual Review of Nutrition 1982. 2:323-341.
Linn, S., et al. "No association between coffee consumption and adverse
outcomes of pregnancy." New England Journal of Medicine 1982.
306( 3) :141-145.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hjpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 411,
"image": "hjpj0226_6.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "hjpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "6"
}
| 252
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 6\nCAFFEINE -- 2\nThe greatest sources of caffeine are coffee, tea and chocolate. Soft\ndrinks add little to the average total intake. In 1978, the Federation of\nAmerican Societies for Experimental Biology reported to the FDA that most\nadults who drank soft drinks actually consumed four to thirteen times more\ncaffeine from other sources while children received two to four times more\ncaffeine from other sources.\nFor consumers who prefer no caffeine in their diets, Pepsi-Cola produces a\nnumber of caffeine-free soft drinks.\nFor Additional Information:\nAmerican Council on Science and Health. The Health Effects of Caffeine.\nSummit, NJ, 1983 Jan.\nDews, P.B. \"Caffeine.\" Annual Review of Nutrition 1982. 2:323-341.\nLinn, S., et al. \"No association between coffee consumption and adverse\noutcomes of pregnancy.\" New England Journal of Medicine 1982.\n306( 3) :141-145.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hjpj0226\n\nQuestion: In which year did American Council on Science and Health , published \"the health effects of caffeine\"?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1983",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
798
|
What add little to the average total intake of caffeine?
|
soft drinks
|
Page 6
CAFFEINE -- 2
The greatest sources of caffeine are coffee, tea and chocolate. Soft
drinks add little to the average total intake. In 1978, the Federation of
American Societies for Experimental Biology reported to the FDA that most
adults who drank soft drinks actually consumed four to thirteen times more
caffeine from other sources while children received two to four times more
caffeine from other sources.
For consumers who prefer no caffeine in their diets, Pepsi-Cola produces a
number of caffeine-free soft drinks.
For Additional Information:
American Council on Science and Health. The Health Effects of Caffeine.
Summit, NJ, 1983 Jan.
Dews, P.B. "Caffeine." Annual Review of Nutrition 1982. 2:323-341.
Linn, S., et al. "No association between coffee consumption and adverse
outcomes of pregnancy." New England Journal of Medicine 1982.
306( 3) :141-145.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hjpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 411,
"image": "hjpj0226_6.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "hjpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "6"
}
| 244
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 6\nCAFFEINE -- 2\nThe greatest sources of caffeine are coffee, tea and chocolate. Soft\ndrinks add little to the average total intake. In 1978, the Federation of\nAmerican Societies for Experimental Biology reported to the FDA that most\nadults who drank soft drinks actually consumed four to thirteen times more\ncaffeine from other sources while children received two to four times more\ncaffeine from other sources.\nFor consumers who prefer no caffeine in their diets, Pepsi-Cola produces a\nnumber of caffeine-free soft drinks.\nFor Additional Information:\nAmerican Council on Science and Health. The Health Effects of Caffeine.\nSummit, NJ, 1983 Jan.\nDews, P.B. \"Caffeine.\" Annual Review of Nutrition 1982. 2:323-341.\nLinn, S., et al. \"No association between coffee consumption and adverse\noutcomes of pregnancy.\" New England Journal of Medicine 1982.\n306( 3) :141-145.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hjpj0226\n\nQuestion: What add little to the average total intake of caffeine?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "soft drinks",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
799
|
what produces a number of caffeine free soft drink for those who prefer no caffeine in their diets?
|
Pepsi-Cola
|
Page 6
CAFFEINE -- 2
The greatest sources of caffeine are coffee, tea and chocolate. Soft
drinks add little to the average total intake. In 1978, the Federation of
American Societies for Experimental Biology reported to the FDA that most
adults who drank soft drinks actually consumed four to thirteen times more
caffeine from other sources while children received two to four times more
caffeine from other sources.
For consumers who prefer no caffeine in their diets, Pepsi-Cola produces a
number of caffeine-free soft drinks.
For Additional Information:
American Council on Science and Health. The Health Effects of Caffeine.
Summit, NJ, 1983 Jan.
Dews, P.B. "Caffeine." Annual Review of Nutrition 1982. 2:323-341.
Linn, S., et al. "No association between coffee consumption and adverse
outcomes of pregnancy." New England Journal of Medicine 1982.
306( 3) :141-145.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hjpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 411,
"image": "hjpj0226_6.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "hjpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "6"
}
| 254
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 6\nCAFFEINE -- 2\nThe greatest sources of caffeine are coffee, tea and chocolate. Soft\ndrinks add little to the average total intake. In 1978, the Federation of\nAmerican Societies for Experimental Biology reported to the FDA that most\nadults who drank soft drinks actually consumed four to thirteen times more\ncaffeine from other sources while children received two to four times more\ncaffeine from other sources.\nFor consumers who prefer no caffeine in their diets, Pepsi-Cola produces a\nnumber of caffeine-free soft drinks.\nFor Additional Information:\nAmerican Council on Science and Health. The Health Effects of Caffeine.\nSummit, NJ, 1983 Jan.\nDews, P.B. \"Caffeine.\" Annual Review of Nutrition 1982. 2:323-341.\nLinn, S., et al. \"No association between coffee consumption and adverse\noutcomes of pregnancy.\" New England Journal of Medicine 1982.\n306( 3) :141-145.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hjpj0226\n\nQuestion: what produces a number of caffeine free soft drink for those who prefer no caffeine in their diets?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Pepsi-Cola",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
807
|
Where is the Coca-cola company foods division located?
|
Houston, Texas
|
Page 5
procucit brief
. . .
Here's another
for the
SON
enemies list. ..
Nutritionally Fortified
Beverage Mix
"The wholesome now experien'
Sleve
...
SAMSON TY
THE COCA-COLA COMPANY
FOODS DIVISION
HOUSTON, TEXAS
Product Concept and Positioning: A fortified beverage
mix, Samson, may substantially add to nutrition pro-
grams in hospitals, schools and foodservice institutions.
The product, originating in 1966 from a nutritional bev-
erage program in underdeveloped countries undertaken
by Coca-Cola, is now in test market as a noncarbonated
beverage for U.S. foodservice use. Samson is positioned as
a pleasant tasting, nutritious drink as a meal component
an ounce.
or snack for all age groups at a cost of less than a penny
Ingredients and Description: Nutrient fortification added
to sugar; partially delactosed and demineralized cheese
whey; natural and artificial flavor, and artificial color to
produce the instant high-protein content beverage mix.
When reconstituted with water, an 8-ounce serving pro-
vides 3.6 grams of protein; 100% of U.S. Recommended
Dietary Allowance of vitamin C; 25% RDA of vitamins
A, D, E, thiamine, riboflavin, Be, and Bar, niacin, folic acid;
and 25% RDA of iron. The mix comes in a sealed foil/paper
laminate bag for moisture protection. Varieties are orange,
lemon, and tropical fruit.
Packaging: The flavored mix dissolves instantly when
stirred in either hot or cold water. One bag mixes with
one gallon of water and can be stored under refrigeration
for future use. The 26-ounce bag yields 17, eight fluid-
ounce drinks.
food product development - February, 1974
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hfpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 412,
"image": "hfpj0226_5.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "hfpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "5"
}
| 454
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 5\nprocucit brief\n. . .\nHere's another\nfor the\nSON\nenemies list. ..\nNutritionally Fortified\nBeverage Mix\n\"The wholesome now experien'\nSleve\n...\nSAMSON TY\nTHE COCA-COLA COMPANY\nFOODS DIVISION\nHOUSTON, TEXAS\nProduct Concept and Positioning: A fortified beverage\nmix, Samson, may substantially add to nutrition pro-\ngrams in hospitals, schools and foodservice institutions.\nThe product, originating in 1966 from a nutritional bev-\nerage program in underdeveloped countries undertaken\nby Coca-Cola, is now in test market as a noncarbonated\nbeverage for U.S. foodservice use. Samson is positioned as\na pleasant tasting, nutritious drink as a meal component\nan ounce.\nor snack for all age groups at a cost of less than a penny\nIngredients and Description: Nutrient fortification added\nto sugar; partially delactosed and demineralized cheese\nwhey; natural and artificial flavor, and artificial color to\nproduce the instant high-protein content beverage mix.\nWhen reconstituted with water, an 8-ounce serving pro-\nvides 3.6 grams of protein; 100% of U.S. Recommended\nDietary Allowance of vitamin C; 25% RDA of vitamins\nA, D, E, thiamine, riboflavin, Be, and Bar, niacin, folic acid;\nand 25% RDA of iron. The mix comes in a sealed foil/paper\nlaminate bag for moisture protection. Varieties are orange,\nlemon, and tropical fruit.\nPackaging: The flavored mix dissolves instantly when\nstirred in either hot or cold water. One bag mixes with\none gallon of water and can be stored under refrigeration\nfor future use. The 26-ounce bag yields 17, eight fluid-\nounce drinks.\nfood product development - February, 1974\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hfpj0226\n\nQuestion: Where is the Coca-cola company foods division located?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Houston, Texas",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
810
|
From which department the letter is issued?
|
Department of health, education, and welfare
|
Page 1
BY HEALTH. EDUCAT
DEPARTMENT OF HER
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
ROCKVILLE. MARYLAND 20857
December 4, 1978
Dear Consumer:
A great deal of consumer interest in food labeling
issues was generated by the Food Labeling Hearings
sponsored by FDA, USDA, and FTC, this past August -
October. Over 452 people testified at the five hearings
and over 5, 000 written comments were received.
This is
indeed an impressive record and we would like to thank
all of you who shared your views and concerns with us.
We are now sending you the first of several communica-
tions to provide you with a preliminary feedback on the
comments and oral presentations made at the pre-meetings
and the hearings themselves.
In the next six months the Agency approach to analyzing
all the oral and written comments will take place in
three stages:
1 .
Quantitative review and analysis of the written
comments and oral testimony.
2.
Interpretive anlaysis and development of a
proposed labeling plan for Federal Register
publication seeking additional public comment.
3 .
Development of a final labeling plan.
When this information is finalized, we will send you
additional completed reports and notification of Federal
Register announcements for your comment.
Sincerely yours,
alexander
Alexander Grant
Special Assistant to the Commissioner
for Consumer Affairs
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/ggpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 414,
"image": "ggpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "ggpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 350
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nBY HEALTH. EDUCAT\nDEPARTMENT OF HER\nDEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE\nPUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE\nFOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION\nROCKVILLE. MARYLAND 20857\nDecember 4, 1978\nDear Consumer:\nA great deal of consumer interest in food labeling\nissues was generated by the Food Labeling Hearings\nsponsored by FDA, USDA, and FTC, this past August -\nOctober. Over 452 people testified at the five hearings\nand over 5, 000 written comments were received.\nThis is\nindeed an impressive record and we would like to thank\nall of you who shared your views and concerns with us.\nWe are now sending you the first of several communica-\ntions to provide you with a preliminary feedback on the\ncomments and oral presentations made at the pre-meetings\nand the hearings themselves.\nIn the next six months the Agency approach to analyzing\nall the oral and written comments will take place in\nthree stages:\n1 .\nQuantitative review and analysis of the written\ncomments and oral testimony.\n2.\nInterpretive anlaysis and development of a\nproposed labeling plan for Federal Register\npublication seeking additional public comment.\n3 .\nDevelopment of a final labeling plan.\nWhen this information is finalized, we will send you\nadditional completed reports and notification of Federal\nRegister announcements for your comment.\nSincerely yours,\nalexander\nAlexander Grant\nSpecial Assistant to the Commissioner\nfor Consumer Affairs\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/ggpj0226\n\nQuestion: From which department the letter is issued?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Department of health, education, and welfare",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
816
|
whose signature at the bottom of page ?
|
Alexander Grant
|
Page 1
BY HEALTH. EDUCAT
DEPARTMENT OF HER
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
ROCKVILLE. MARYLAND 20857
December 4, 1978
Dear Consumer:
A great deal of consumer interest in food labeling
issues was generated by the Food Labeling Hearings
sponsored by FDA, USDA, and FTC, this past August -
October. Over 452 people testified at the five hearings
and over 5, 000 written comments were received.
This is
indeed an impressive record and we would like to thank
all of you who shared your views and concerns with us.
We are now sending you the first of several communica-
tions to provide you with a preliminary feedback on the
comments and oral presentations made at the pre-meetings
and the hearings themselves.
In the next six months the Agency approach to analyzing
all the oral and written comments will take place in
three stages:
1 .
Quantitative review and analysis of the written
comments and oral testimony.
2.
Interpretive anlaysis and development of a
proposed labeling plan for Federal Register
publication seeking additional public comment.
3 .
Development of a final labeling plan.
When this information is finalized, we will send you
additional completed reports and notification of Federal
Register announcements for your comment.
Sincerely yours,
alexander
Alexander Grant
Special Assistant to the Commissioner
for Consumer Affairs
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/ggpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 414,
"image": "ggpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "ggpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 344
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nBY HEALTH. EDUCAT\nDEPARTMENT OF HER\nDEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE\nPUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE\nFOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION\nROCKVILLE. MARYLAND 20857\nDecember 4, 1978\nDear Consumer:\nA great deal of consumer interest in food labeling\nissues was generated by the Food Labeling Hearings\nsponsored by FDA, USDA, and FTC, this past August -\nOctober. Over 452 people testified at the five hearings\nand over 5, 000 written comments were received.\nThis is\nindeed an impressive record and we would like to thank\nall of you who shared your views and concerns with us.\nWe are now sending you the first of several communica-\ntions to provide you with a preliminary feedback on the\ncomments and oral presentations made at the pre-meetings\nand the hearings themselves.\nIn the next six months the Agency approach to analyzing\nall the oral and written comments will take place in\nthree stages:\n1 .\nQuantitative review and analysis of the written\ncomments and oral testimony.\n2.\nInterpretive anlaysis and development of a\nproposed labeling plan for Federal Register\npublication seeking additional public comment.\n3 .\nDevelopment of a final labeling plan.\nWhen this information is finalized, we will send you\nadditional completed reports and notification of Federal\nRegister announcements for your comment.\nSincerely yours,\nalexander\nAlexander Grant\nSpecial Assistant to the Commissioner\nfor Consumer Affairs\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/ggpj0226\n\nQuestion: whose signature at the bottom of page ?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Alexander Grant",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
817
|
what is the date mentioned at the top of the page?
|
November 14, 1986
|
Page 1
PEPSI-COLA COMPANY
PURCHASE . NEW YORK 10577
November 14, 1986
Ms. Laurie Quint
Center for Science in the Public Interest
1501 Sixteenth St. N.W.
Washington, DC 20036
Dear Ms. Quint:
Thank you for your recent letter to Pepsi-Cola requesting
information about our products.
A complete listing of the ingredients in our Pepsi products appears
on each package. In answer to your question regarding the
nutritional breakdown of our carbonated beverages, we are enclosing
Product Ingredient Data Sheet. Please note that the amounts of
sodium, potassium and calcium depend on the local water supply.
Our independently owned and operated Pepsi-Cola franchise bottlers
have the choice of using one of the sweeteners authorized for use by
the Pepsi-Cola system. The bottlers primarily use sucrose and high
fructose corn syrup.
The sweetener used in Pepsi-Cola determines its exact caloric
content. When sweetened with sucrose, Pepsi-Cola has 13.1 calories
per ounce, or 157 calories in a 12-ounce can. When sweetened with
high fructose corn syrup, it contains 13.3 calories, for a total of
160 calories per 12-ounce serving.
The caloric content indicated on the enclosed sheet is for
Pepsi-Cola sweetened with sucrose. This calculation is based on the
standard multiplier of 3.8 calories per gram of carbohydrate.
We appreciate your interest in Pepsi-Cola Company and its products
and hope this information has been helpful to you.
Sincerely ,
anita Pancatted
Anita Pancotto
Consumer Correspondent
AP /es
Enclosure
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hjpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 415,
"image": "hjpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "hjpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 394
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPEPSI-COLA COMPANY\nPURCHASE . NEW YORK 10577\nNovember 14, 1986\nMs. Laurie Quint\nCenter for Science in the Public Interest\n1501 Sixteenth St. N.W.\nWashington, DC 20036\nDear Ms. Quint:\nThank you for your recent letter to Pepsi-Cola requesting\ninformation about our products.\nA complete listing of the ingredients in our Pepsi products appears\non each package. In answer to your question regarding the\nnutritional breakdown of our carbonated beverages, we are enclosing\nProduct Ingredient Data Sheet. Please note that the amounts of\nsodium, potassium and calcium depend on the local water supply.\nOur independently owned and operated Pepsi-Cola franchise bottlers\nhave the choice of using one of the sweeteners authorized for use by\nthe Pepsi-Cola system. The bottlers primarily use sucrose and high\nfructose corn syrup.\nThe sweetener used in Pepsi-Cola determines its exact caloric\ncontent. When sweetened with sucrose, Pepsi-Cola has 13.1 calories\nper ounce, or 157 calories in a 12-ounce can. When sweetened with\nhigh fructose corn syrup, it contains 13.3 calories, for a total of\n160 calories per 12-ounce serving.\nThe caloric content indicated on the enclosed sheet is for\nPepsi-Cola sweetened with sucrose. This calculation is based on the\nstandard multiplier of 3.8 calories per gram of carbohydrate.\nWe appreciate your interest in Pepsi-Cola Company and its products\nand hope this information has been helpful to you.\nSincerely ,\nanita Pancatted\nAnita Pancotto\nConsumer Correspondent\nAP /es\nEnclosure\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hjpj0226\n\nQuestion: what is the date mentioned at the top of the page?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "November 14, 1986",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
827
|
who is the consumer correspondent?
|
Anita Pancotto
|
Page 1
PEPSI-COLA COMPANY
PURCHASE . NEW YORK 10577
November 14, 1986
Ms. Laurie Quint
Center for Science in the Public Interest
1501 Sixteenth St. N.W.
Washington, DC 20036
Dear Ms. Quint:
Thank you for your recent letter to Pepsi-Cola requesting
information about our products.
A complete listing of the ingredients in our Pepsi products appears
on each package. In answer to your question regarding the
nutritional breakdown of our carbonated beverages, we are enclosing
Product Ingredient Data Sheet. Please note that the amounts of
sodium, potassium and calcium depend on the local water supply.
Our independently owned and operated Pepsi-Cola franchise bottlers
have the choice of using one of the sweeteners authorized for use by
the Pepsi-Cola system. The bottlers primarily use sucrose and high
fructose corn syrup.
The sweetener used in Pepsi-Cola determines its exact caloric
content. When sweetened with sucrose, Pepsi-Cola has 13.1 calories
per ounce, or 157 calories in a 12-ounce can. When sweetened with
high fructose corn syrup, it contains 13.3 calories, for a total of
160 calories per 12-ounce serving.
The caloric content indicated on the enclosed sheet is for
Pepsi-Cola sweetened with sucrose. This calculation is based on the
standard multiplier of 3.8 calories per gram of carbohydrate.
We appreciate your interest in Pepsi-Cola Company and its products
and hope this information has been helpful to you.
Sincerely ,
anita Pancatted
Anita Pancotto
Consumer Correspondent
AP /es
Enclosure
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hjpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 415,
"image": "hjpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "hjpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 385
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPEPSI-COLA COMPANY\nPURCHASE . NEW YORK 10577\nNovember 14, 1986\nMs. Laurie Quint\nCenter for Science in the Public Interest\n1501 Sixteenth St. N.W.\nWashington, DC 20036\nDear Ms. Quint:\nThank you for your recent letter to Pepsi-Cola requesting\ninformation about our products.\nA complete listing of the ingredients in our Pepsi products appears\non each package. In answer to your question regarding the\nnutritional breakdown of our carbonated beverages, we are enclosing\nProduct Ingredient Data Sheet. Please note that the amounts of\nsodium, potassium and calcium depend on the local water supply.\nOur independently owned and operated Pepsi-Cola franchise bottlers\nhave the choice of using one of the sweeteners authorized for use by\nthe Pepsi-Cola system. The bottlers primarily use sucrose and high\nfructose corn syrup.\nThe sweetener used in Pepsi-Cola determines its exact caloric\ncontent. When sweetened with sucrose, Pepsi-Cola has 13.1 calories\nper ounce, or 157 calories in a 12-ounce can. When sweetened with\nhigh fructose corn syrup, it contains 13.3 calories, for a total of\n160 calories per 12-ounce serving.\nThe caloric content indicated on the enclosed sheet is for\nPepsi-Cola sweetened with sucrose. This calculation is based on the\nstandard multiplier of 3.8 calories per gram of carbohydrate.\nWe appreciate your interest in Pepsi-Cola Company and its products\nand hope this information has been helpful to you.\nSincerely ,\nanita Pancatted\nAnita Pancotto\nConsumer Correspondent\nAP /es\nEnclosure\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hjpj0226\n\nQuestion: who is the consumer correspondent?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Anita Pancotto",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
829
|
Who is this letter sent to?
|
Mr. Alm
|
Page 1
Of HEALTH
ATMENT OF H
KIMAN SERVICES
THE SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20201
OCT 0 3 2003
\ Mr. John R. Alm
President and Chief Operating Officer
Coca-Cola Enterprise, Inc.
P.O. Box 723040
Atlanta, Georgia 31 139-0040
Dear Mr. Alm:
Thank you for your letter regarding our recent meeting concerning the nation's obesity epidemic. I
appreciate your willingness to join with me in attacking this most serious public health concern. The
five steps that Coca-cola Enterprises, Inc. is taking to address the obesity epidemic, especially
among our nation's children, represents an important beginning and commitment.
As we discussed, my prevention initiative, Steps To A HealthierUS, focuses on preventing obesity
and such diseases as diabetes and asthma by promoting physical activity, good nutrition, and
preventive health services. The initiative advances the President's HealthierUS goal of helping
Americans live longer, better and healthier lives.
The challenge is to create a comprehensive multifaceted public health approach capable of delivering
long-term improvements in the lifestyles of Americans. Effective action requires the close
cooperation and collaboration of a variety of corporate enterprises, organizations and individuals at
all levels. Only with the support and investment from a broad array of public and private partners,
such as yourself and others, will we succeed.
I commend you for leadership in taking action to promote health beverage choice, nutrition
education, and physical activity, especially for our children in and out of school. In addition to the
actions that you mentioned, my staff tells me that your company is now selling 8 ounce bottles and
cans of beverages. This seems to be an excellent way to draw attention to the importance of portion
size and help consumers limit their intake of excess calories by controlling portion sizes. . I
encourage you to continue your efforts and identify even more ways to help us decrease overweight
and obesity in this country and I look forward to future collaborations
Finally, on a separate note, I applaud your personal commitment to helping the children of Los
Angeles build bright futures through Camp Paintrock, and I hope to take you up on your invitation to
visit.
Sincerely,
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/sfpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 417,
"image": "sfpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "sfpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 513
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nOf HEALTH\nATMENT OF H\nKIMAN SERVICES\nTHE SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES\nWASHINGTON, D.C. 20201\nOCT 0 3 2003\n\\ Mr. John R. Alm\nPresident and Chief Operating Officer\nCoca-Cola Enterprise, Inc.\nP.O. Box 723040\nAtlanta, Georgia 31 139-0040\nDear Mr. Alm:\nThank you for your letter regarding our recent meeting concerning the nation's obesity epidemic. I\nappreciate your willingness to join with me in attacking this most serious public health concern. The\nfive steps that Coca-cola Enterprises, Inc. is taking to address the obesity epidemic, especially\namong our nation's children, represents an important beginning and commitment.\nAs we discussed, my prevention initiative, Steps To A HealthierUS, focuses on preventing obesity\nand such diseases as diabetes and asthma by promoting physical activity, good nutrition, and\npreventive health services. The initiative advances the President's HealthierUS goal of helping\nAmericans live longer, better and healthier lives.\nThe challenge is to create a comprehensive multifaceted public health approach capable of delivering\nlong-term improvements in the lifestyles of Americans. Effective action requires the close\ncooperation and collaboration of a variety of corporate enterprises, organizations and individuals at\nall levels. Only with the support and investment from a broad array of public and private partners,\nsuch as yourself and others, will we succeed.\nI commend you for leadership in taking action to promote health beverage choice, nutrition\neducation, and physical activity, especially for our children in and out of school. In addition to the\nactions that you mentioned, my staff tells me that your company is now selling 8 ounce bottles and\ncans of beverages. This seems to be an excellent way to draw attention to the importance of portion\nsize and help consumers limit their intake of excess calories by controlling portion sizes. . I\nencourage you to continue your efforts and identify even more ways to help us decrease overweight\nand obesity in this country and I look forward to future collaborations\nFinally, on a separate note, I applaud your personal commitment to helping the children of Los\nAngeles build bright futures through Camp Paintrock, and I hope to take you up on your invitation to\nvisit.\nSincerely,\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/sfpj0226\n\nQuestion: Who is this letter sent to?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Mr. Alm",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
830
|
what is the designation of Mr.john r alm?
|
President and Chief Operating Officer
|
Page 1
Of HEALTH
ATMENT OF H
KIMAN SERVICES
THE SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20201
OCT 0 3 2003
\ Mr. John R. Alm
President and Chief Operating Officer
Coca-Cola Enterprise, Inc.
P.O. Box 723040
Atlanta, Georgia 31 139-0040
Dear Mr. Alm:
Thank you for your letter regarding our recent meeting concerning the nation's obesity epidemic. I
appreciate your willingness to join with me in attacking this most serious public health concern. The
five steps that Coca-cola Enterprises, Inc. is taking to address the obesity epidemic, especially
among our nation's children, represents an important beginning and commitment.
As we discussed, my prevention initiative, Steps To A HealthierUS, focuses on preventing obesity
and such diseases as diabetes and asthma by promoting physical activity, good nutrition, and
preventive health services. The initiative advances the President's HealthierUS goal of helping
Americans live longer, better and healthier lives.
The challenge is to create a comprehensive multifaceted public health approach capable of delivering
long-term improvements in the lifestyles of Americans. Effective action requires the close
cooperation and collaboration of a variety of corporate enterprises, organizations and individuals at
all levels. Only with the support and investment from a broad array of public and private partners,
such as yourself and others, will we succeed.
I commend you for leadership in taking action to promote health beverage choice, nutrition
education, and physical activity, especially for our children in and out of school. In addition to the
actions that you mentioned, my staff tells me that your company is now selling 8 ounce bottles and
cans of beverages. This seems to be an excellent way to draw attention to the importance of portion
size and help consumers limit their intake of excess calories by controlling portion sizes. . I
encourage you to continue your efforts and identify even more ways to help us decrease overweight
and obesity in this country and I look forward to future collaborations
Finally, on a separate note, I applaud your personal commitment to helping the children of Los
Angeles build bright futures through Camp Paintrock, and I hope to take you up on your invitation to
visit.
Sincerely,
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/sfpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 417,
"image": "sfpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "sfpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 518
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nOf HEALTH\nATMENT OF H\nKIMAN SERVICES\nTHE SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES\nWASHINGTON, D.C. 20201\nOCT 0 3 2003\n\\ Mr. John R. Alm\nPresident and Chief Operating Officer\nCoca-Cola Enterprise, Inc.\nP.O. Box 723040\nAtlanta, Georgia 31 139-0040\nDear Mr. Alm:\nThank you for your letter regarding our recent meeting concerning the nation's obesity epidemic. I\nappreciate your willingness to join with me in attacking this most serious public health concern. The\nfive steps that Coca-cola Enterprises, Inc. is taking to address the obesity epidemic, especially\namong our nation's children, represents an important beginning and commitment.\nAs we discussed, my prevention initiative, Steps To A HealthierUS, focuses on preventing obesity\nand such diseases as diabetes and asthma by promoting physical activity, good nutrition, and\npreventive health services. The initiative advances the President's HealthierUS goal of helping\nAmericans live longer, better and healthier lives.\nThe challenge is to create a comprehensive multifaceted public health approach capable of delivering\nlong-term improvements in the lifestyles of Americans. Effective action requires the close\ncooperation and collaboration of a variety of corporate enterprises, organizations and individuals at\nall levels. Only with the support and investment from a broad array of public and private partners,\nsuch as yourself and others, will we succeed.\nI commend you for leadership in taking action to promote health beverage choice, nutrition\neducation, and physical activity, especially for our children in and out of school. In addition to the\nactions that you mentioned, my staff tells me that your company is now selling 8 ounce bottles and\ncans of beverages. This seems to be an excellent way to draw attention to the importance of portion\nsize and help consumers limit their intake of excess calories by controlling portion sizes. . I\nencourage you to continue your efforts and identify even more ways to help us decrease overweight\nand obesity in this country and I look forward to future collaborations\nFinally, on a separate note, I applaud your personal commitment to helping the children of Los\nAngeles build bright futures through Camp Paintrock, and I hope to take you up on your invitation to\nvisit.\nSincerely,\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/sfpj0226\n\nQuestion: what is the designation of Mr.john r alm?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "President and Chief Operating Officer",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
831
|
what is the president's healthierUS goal ?
|
helping americans live longer, better and healthier lives.
|
Page 1
Of HEALTH
ATMENT OF H
KIMAN SERVICES
THE SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20201
OCT 0 3 2003
\ Mr. John R. Alm
President and Chief Operating Officer
Coca-Cola Enterprise, Inc.
P.O. Box 723040
Atlanta, Georgia 31 139-0040
Dear Mr. Alm:
Thank you for your letter regarding our recent meeting concerning the nation's obesity epidemic. I
appreciate your willingness to join with me in attacking this most serious public health concern. The
five steps that Coca-cola Enterprises, Inc. is taking to address the obesity epidemic, especially
among our nation's children, represents an important beginning and commitment.
As we discussed, my prevention initiative, Steps To A HealthierUS, focuses on preventing obesity
and such diseases as diabetes and asthma by promoting physical activity, good nutrition, and
preventive health services. The initiative advances the President's HealthierUS goal of helping
Americans live longer, better and healthier lives.
The challenge is to create a comprehensive multifaceted public health approach capable of delivering
long-term improvements in the lifestyles of Americans. Effective action requires the close
cooperation and collaboration of a variety of corporate enterprises, organizations and individuals at
all levels. Only with the support and investment from a broad array of public and private partners,
such as yourself and others, will we succeed.
I commend you for leadership in taking action to promote health beverage choice, nutrition
education, and physical activity, especially for our children in and out of school. In addition to the
actions that you mentioned, my staff tells me that your company is now selling 8 ounce bottles and
cans of beverages. This seems to be an excellent way to draw attention to the importance of portion
size and help consumers limit their intake of excess calories by controlling portion sizes. . I
encourage you to continue your efforts and identify even more ways to help us decrease overweight
and obesity in this country and I look forward to future collaborations
Finally, on a separate note, I applaud your personal commitment to helping the children of Los
Angeles build bright futures through Camp Paintrock, and I hope to take you up on your invitation to
visit.
Sincerely,
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/sfpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 417,
"image": "sfpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "sfpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 523
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nOf HEALTH\nATMENT OF H\nKIMAN SERVICES\nTHE SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES\nWASHINGTON, D.C. 20201\nOCT 0 3 2003\n\\ Mr. John R. Alm\nPresident and Chief Operating Officer\nCoca-Cola Enterprise, Inc.\nP.O. Box 723040\nAtlanta, Georgia 31 139-0040\nDear Mr. Alm:\nThank you for your letter regarding our recent meeting concerning the nation's obesity epidemic. I\nappreciate your willingness to join with me in attacking this most serious public health concern. The\nfive steps that Coca-cola Enterprises, Inc. is taking to address the obesity epidemic, especially\namong our nation's children, represents an important beginning and commitment.\nAs we discussed, my prevention initiative, Steps To A HealthierUS, focuses on preventing obesity\nand such diseases as diabetes and asthma by promoting physical activity, good nutrition, and\npreventive health services. The initiative advances the President's HealthierUS goal of helping\nAmericans live longer, better and healthier lives.\nThe challenge is to create a comprehensive multifaceted public health approach capable of delivering\nlong-term improvements in the lifestyles of Americans. Effective action requires the close\ncooperation and collaboration of a variety of corporate enterprises, organizations and individuals at\nall levels. Only with the support and investment from a broad array of public and private partners,\nsuch as yourself and others, will we succeed.\nI commend you for leadership in taking action to promote health beverage choice, nutrition\neducation, and physical activity, especially for our children in and out of school. In addition to the\nactions that you mentioned, my staff tells me that your company is now selling 8 ounce bottles and\ncans of beverages. This seems to be an excellent way to draw attention to the importance of portion\nsize and help consumers limit their intake of excess calories by controlling portion sizes. . I\nencourage you to continue your efforts and identify even more ways to help us decrease overweight\nand obesity in this country and I look forward to future collaborations\nFinally, on a separate note, I applaud your personal commitment to helping the children of Los\nAngeles build bright futures through Camp Paintrock, and I hope to take you up on your invitation to\nvisit.\nSincerely,\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/sfpj0226\n\nQuestion: what is the president's healthierUS goal ?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "helping americans live longer, better and healthier lives.",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
832
|
what is the reason to applaud Alm?
|
personal commitment to helping the children of los angeles build bright futures through camp paintrock
|
Page 1
Of HEALTH
ATMENT OF H
KIMAN SERVICES
THE SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20201
OCT 0 3 2003
\ Mr. John R. Alm
President and Chief Operating Officer
Coca-Cola Enterprise, Inc.
P.O. Box 723040
Atlanta, Georgia 31 139-0040
Dear Mr. Alm:
Thank you for your letter regarding our recent meeting concerning the nation's obesity epidemic. I
appreciate your willingness to join with me in attacking this most serious public health concern. The
five steps that Coca-cola Enterprises, Inc. is taking to address the obesity epidemic, especially
among our nation's children, represents an important beginning and commitment.
As we discussed, my prevention initiative, Steps To A HealthierUS, focuses on preventing obesity
and such diseases as diabetes and asthma by promoting physical activity, good nutrition, and
preventive health services. The initiative advances the President's HealthierUS goal of helping
Americans live longer, better and healthier lives.
The challenge is to create a comprehensive multifaceted public health approach capable of delivering
long-term improvements in the lifestyles of Americans. Effective action requires the close
cooperation and collaboration of a variety of corporate enterprises, organizations and individuals at
all levels. Only with the support and investment from a broad array of public and private partners,
such as yourself and others, will we succeed.
I commend you for leadership in taking action to promote health beverage choice, nutrition
education, and physical activity, especially for our children in and out of school. In addition to the
actions that you mentioned, my staff tells me that your company is now selling 8 ounce bottles and
cans of beverages. This seems to be an excellent way to draw attention to the importance of portion
size and help consumers limit their intake of excess calories by controlling portion sizes. . I
encourage you to continue your efforts and identify even more ways to help us decrease overweight
and obesity in this country and I look forward to future collaborations
Finally, on a separate note, I applaud your personal commitment to helping the children of Los
Angeles build bright futures through Camp Paintrock, and I hope to take you up on your invitation to
visit.
Sincerely,
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/sfpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 417,
"image": "sfpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "sfpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 528
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nOf HEALTH\nATMENT OF H\nKIMAN SERVICES\nTHE SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES\nWASHINGTON, D.C. 20201\nOCT 0 3 2003\n\\ Mr. John R. Alm\nPresident and Chief Operating Officer\nCoca-Cola Enterprise, Inc.\nP.O. Box 723040\nAtlanta, Georgia 31 139-0040\nDear Mr. Alm:\nThank you for your letter regarding our recent meeting concerning the nation's obesity epidemic. I\nappreciate your willingness to join with me in attacking this most serious public health concern. The\nfive steps that Coca-cola Enterprises, Inc. is taking to address the obesity epidemic, especially\namong our nation's children, represents an important beginning and commitment.\nAs we discussed, my prevention initiative, Steps To A HealthierUS, focuses on preventing obesity\nand such diseases as diabetes and asthma by promoting physical activity, good nutrition, and\npreventive health services. The initiative advances the President's HealthierUS goal of helping\nAmericans live longer, better and healthier lives.\nThe challenge is to create a comprehensive multifaceted public health approach capable of delivering\nlong-term improvements in the lifestyles of Americans. Effective action requires the close\ncooperation and collaboration of a variety of corporate enterprises, organizations and individuals at\nall levels. Only with the support and investment from a broad array of public and private partners,\nsuch as yourself and others, will we succeed.\nI commend you for leadership in taking action to promote health beverage choice, nutrition\neducation, and physical activity, especially for our children in and out of school. In addition to the\nactions that you mentioned, my staff tells me that your company is now selling 8 ounce bottles and\ncans of beverages. This seems to be an excellent way to draw attention to the importance of portion\nsize and help consumers limit their intake of excess calories by controlling portion sizes. . I\nencourage you to continue your efforts and identify even more ways to help us decrease overweight\nand obesity in this country and I look forward to future collaborations\nFinally, on a separate note, I applaud your personal commitment to helping the children of Los\nAngeles build bright futures through Camp Paintrock, and I hope to take you up on your invitation to\nvisit.\nSincerely,\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/sfpj0226\n\nQuestion: what is the reason to applaud Alm?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "personal commitment to helping the children of los angeles build bright futures through camp paintrock",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
833
|
what is the title of the page?
|
Sing With Me
|
Page 6
SING WITH ME
I'm gonna sing my song like I never sang before
I'm gonna sing about life and the real things we need more
Well I hope you don't mind if I sip on my Coke while I sing my song cause
it cools my throat ...
And you can have one too and sing along with me.
I'm gonna sing about the mountains and the valleys
And the real things in life that surround me
Things like the ocean
True love and devotion
So have a Coke and sing along with me.
About the real things. Coke is.
It's the real thing. Coca-cola.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzyj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 418,
"image": "rzyj0226_6.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rzyj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "6"
}
| 165
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 6\nSING WITH ME\nI'm gonna sing my song like I never sang before\nI'm gonna sing about life and the real things we need more\nWell I hope you don't mind if I sip on my Coke while I sing my song cause\nit cools my throat ...\nAnd you can have one too and sing along with me.\nI'm gonna sing about the mountains and the valleys\nAnd the real things in life that surround me\nThings like the ocean\nTrue love and devotion\nSo have a Coke and sing along with me.\nAbout the real things. Coke is.\nIt's the real thing. Coca-cola.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzyj0226\n\nQuestion: what is the title of the page?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Sing With Me",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
835
|
what happens if i sip on my coke while i sing my song according to letter?
|
it cools my throat
|
Page 6
SING WITH ME
I'm gonna sing my song like I never sang before
I'm gonna sing about life and the real things we need more
Well I hope you don't mind if I sip on my Coke while I sing my song cause
it cools my throat ...
And you can have one too and sing along with me.
I'm gonna sing about the mountains and the valleys
And the real things in life that surround me
Things like the ocean
True love and devotion
So have a Coke and sing along with me.
About the real things. Coke is.
It's the real thing. Coca-cola.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzyj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 418,
"image": "rzyj0226_6.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rzyj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "6"
}
| 176
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 6\nSING WITH ME\nI'm gonna sing my song like I never sang before\nI'm gonna sing about life and the real things we need more\nWell I hope you don't mind if I sip on my Coke while I sing my song cause\nit cools my throat ...\nAnd you can have one too and sing along with me.\nI'm gonna sing about the mountains and the valleys\nAnd the real things in life that surround me\nThings like the ocean\nTrue love and devotion\nSo have a Coke and sing along with me.\nAbout the real things. Coke is.\nIt's the real thing. Coca-cola.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzyj0226\n\nQuestion: what happens if i sip on my coke while i sing my song according to letter?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "it cools my throat",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
839
|
where is the place of coca-cola companyas mentioned in the letterhead?
|
Atlanta, Georgia
|
Page 1
The CocaCola Company
ATLANTA, GEORGIA
ADDRESS REPLY TO
FIDELES KLOECKLER
P. O. DRAWER 1734
PUBLIC RELATIONS DEPARTMENT
ATLANTA, GA. 30301
November 1, 1972
(404) 897-2121
Ms. Catherine Lerza
Nutrition Coordinator
Washington Ecology Center
2000 "P" Street, N. W. , Room 612
Washington, D. C.
20036
Dear Ms. Lerza:
Our Research Department has shared with us your letter expressing
interest in our development of protein beverages. We will be glad
to attempt to answer your questions.
The Coca-Cola Company for several years has been involved in the
research and development of refreshing beverages that contain pro-
tein, vitamins and minerals. The long-range objective of this program
is to develop a variety of good-tasting nutritional beverages which
would be compatible with different consumer food preferences around
the world. In support of this objective, every effort is being made
to utilize locally available protein sources.
Considerable research and development relating to the composition
and use of such products is well underway in many parts of the world,
including the United States. However, the Latin America project
is the most advanced to date.
Three protein-containing beverages have been marketed by The Coca-cola
Export Corporation, a subsidiary of The Coca-cola Company.
Saci was the Company's first protein-containing beverage. Begin-
ning in 1968, it was test-marketed in chocolate and caramel flavors
in suburbs of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The beverage was non-carbonated.
The protein content was derived from Brazilian soybeans and seven
vitamins were added.
Brazil was selected for the test-market location because of ready
availability of local soybeans as a protein source, local machinery
and local talent to assist in the development and launching of the
new product. A further consideration was the fact that the Company-
owned bottling operation in Rio gave better flexibility in carrying
out the experiment.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/phpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 420,
"image": "phpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "phpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 475
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nThe CocaCola Company\nATLANTA, GEORGIA\nADDRESS REPLY TO\nFIDELES KLOECKLER\nP. O. DRAWER 1734\nPUBLIC RELATIONS DEPARTMENT\nATLANTA, GA. 30301\nNovember 1, 1972\n(404) 897-2121\nMs. Catherine Lerza\nNutrition Coordinator\nWashington Ecology Center\n2000 \"P\" Street, N. W. , Room 612\nWashington, D. C.\n20036\nDear Ms. Lerza:\nOur Research Department has shared with us your letter expressing\ninterest in our development of protein beverages. We will be glad\nto attempt to answer your questions.\nThe Coca-Cola Company for several years has been involved in the\nresearch and development of refreshing beverages that contain pro-\ntein, vitamins and minerals. The long-range objective of this program\nis to develop a variety of good-tasting nutritional beverages which\nwould be compatible with different consumer food preferences around\nthe world. In support of this objective, every effort is being made\nto utilize locally available protein sources.\nConsiderable research and development relating to the composition\nand use of such products is well underway in many parts of the world,\nincluding the United States. However, the Latin America project\nis the most advanced to date.\nThree protein-containing beverages have been marketed by The Coca-cola\nExport Corporation, a subsidiary of The Coca-cola Company.\nSaci was the Company's first protein-containing beverage. Begin-\nning in 1968, it was test-marketed in chocolate and caramel flavors\nin suburbs of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The beverage was non-carbonated.\nThe protein content was derived from Brazilian soybeans and seven\nvitamins were added.\nBrazil was selected for the test-market location because of ready\navailability of local soybeans as a protein source, local machinery\nand local talent to assist in the development and launching of the\nnew product. A further consideration was the fact that the Company-\nowned bottling operation in Rio gave better flexibility in carrying\nout the experiment.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/phpj0226\n\nQuestion: where is the place of coca-cola companyas mentioned in the letterhead?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Atlanta, Georgia",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
841
|
What is the letter dated?
|
November 1, 1972
|
Page 3
Ms. Catherine Lerza
Washington Ecology Center
-3-
November 1, 1972
combination per child) . The product has been provided free of charge to
several Atlanta schools for several months and student acceptance has
been good.
Again, we appreciate your interest in our developments and hope the
above will be helpful.
Sincerely ,
(han ) Silver /Flockly
Public Relations Assistant
FK:sga
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/phpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 421,
"image": "phpj0226_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "phpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 128
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nMs. Catherine Lerza\nWashington Ecology Center\n-3-\nNovember 1, 1972\ncombination per child) . The product has been provided free of charge to\nseveral Atlanta schools for several months and student acceptance has\nbeen good.\nAgain, we appreciate your interest in our developments and hope the\nabove will be helpful.\nSincerely ,\n(han ) Silver /Flockly\nPublic Relations Assistant\nFK:sga\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/phpj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the letter dated?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "November 1, 1972",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
842
|
What is the designation of the sender in this letter?
|
public relations assistant
|
Page 3
Ms. Catherine Lerza
Washington Ecology Center
-3-
November 1, 1972
combination per child) . The product has been provided free of charge to
several Atlanta schools for several months and student acceptance has
been good.
Again, we appreciate your interest in our developments and hope the
above will be helpful.
Sincerely ,
(han ) Silver /Flockly
Public Relations Assistant
FK:sga
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/phpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 421,
"image": "phpj0226_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "phpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 129
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nMs. Catherine Lerza\nWashington Ecology Center\n-3-\nNovember 1, 1972\ncombination per child) . The product has been provided free of charge to\nseveral Atlanta schools for several months and student acceptance has\nbeen good.\nAgain, we appreciate your interest in our developments and hope the\nabove will be helpful.\nSincerely ,\n(han ) Silver /Flockly\nPublic Relations Assistant\nFK:sga\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/phpj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the designation of the sender in this letter?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "public relations assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
843
|
Who is this letter addressed to?
|
Ms. Catherine Lerza
|
Page 1
The CocaCola Company
ATLANTA, GEORGIA
ADDRESS REPLY TO
FIDELES KLOECKLER
P. O. DRAWER 1734
PUBLIC RELATIONS DEPARTMENT
ATLANTA, GA. 30301
November 1, 1972
(404) 897-2121
Ms. Catherine Lerza
Nutrition Coordinator
Washington Ecology Center
2000 "P" Street, N. W. , Room 612
Washington, D. C.
20036
Dear Ms. Lerza:
Our Research Department has shared with us your letter expressing
interest in our development of protein beverages. We will be glad
to attempt to answer your questions.
The Coca-Cola Company for several years has been involved in the
research and development of refreshing beverages that contain pro-
tein, vitamins and minerals. The long-range objective of this program
is to develop a variety of good-tasting nutritional beverages which
would be compatible with different consumer food preferences around
the world. In support of this objective, every effort is being made
to utilize locally available protein sources.
Considerable research and development relating to the composition
and use of such products is well underway in many parts of the world,
including the United States. However, the Latin America project
is the most advanced to date.
Three protein-containing beverages have been marketed by The Coca-cola
Export Corporation, a subsidiary of The Coca-cola Company.
Saci was the Company's first protein-containing beverage. Begin-
ning in 1968, it was test-marketed in chocolate and caramel flavors
in suburbs of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The beverage was non-carbonated.
The protein content was derived from Brazilian soybeans and seven
vitamins were added.
Brazil was selected for the test-market location because of ready
availability of local soybeans as a protein source, local machinery
and local talent to assist in the development and launching of the
new product. A further consideration was the fact that the Company-
owned bottling operation in Rio gave better flexibility in carrying
out the experiment.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/phpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 420,
"image": "phpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "phpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 466
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nThe CocaCola Company\nATLANTA, GEORGIA\nADDRESS REPLY TO\nFIDELES KLOECKLER\nP. O. DRAWER 1734\nPUBLIC RELATIONS DEPARTMENT\nATLANTA, GA. 30301\nNovember 1, 1972\n(404) 897-2121\nMs. Catherine Lerza\nNutrition Coordinator\nWashington Ecology Center\n2000 \"P\" Street, N. W. , Room 612\nWashington, D. C.\n20036\nDear Ms. Lerza:\nOur Research Department has shared with us your letter expressing\ninterest in our development of protein beverages. We will be glad\nto attempt to answer your questions.\nThe Coca-Cola Company for several years has been involved in the\nresearch and development of refreshing beverages that contain pro-\ntein, vitamins and minerals. The long-range objective of this program\nis to develop a variety of good-tasting nutritional beverages which\nwould be compatible with different consumer food preferences around\nthe world. In support of this objective, every effort is being made\nto utilize locally available protein sources.\nConsiderable research and development relating to the composition\nand use of such products is well underway in many parts of the world,\nincluding the United States. However, the Latin America project\nis the most advanced to date.\nThree protein-containing beverages have been marketed by The Coca-cola\nExport Corporation, a subsidiary of The Coca-cola Company.\nSaci was the Company's first protein-containing beverage. Begin-\nning in 1968, it was test-marketed in chocolate and caramel flavors\nin suburbs of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The beverage was non-carbonated.\nThe protein content was derived from Brazilian soybeans and seven\nvitamins were added.\nBrazil was selected for the test-market location because of ready\navailability of local soybeans as a protein source, local machinery\nand local talent to assist in the development and launching of the\nnew product. A further consideration was the fact that the Company-\nowned bottling operation in Rio gave better flexibility in carrying\nout the experiment.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/phpj0226\n\nQuestion: Who is this letter addressed to?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Ms. Catherine Lerza",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
844
|
what was the company's first protein containing beverage?
|
Saci
|
Page 1
The CocaCola Company
ATLANTA, GEORGIA
ADDRESS REPLY TO
FIDELES KLOECKLER
P. O. DRAWER 1734
PUBLIC RELATIONS DEPARTMENT
ATLANTA, GA. 30301
November 1, 1972
(404) 897-2121
Ms. Catherine Lerza
Nutrition Coordinator
Washington Ecology Center
2000 "P" Street, N. W. , Room 612
Washington, D. C.
20036
Dear Ms. Lerza:
Our Research Department has shared with us your letter expressing
interest in our development of protein beverages. We will be glad
to attempt to answer your questions.
The Coca-Cola Company for several years has been involved in the
research and development of refreshing beverages that contain pro-
tein, vitamins and minerals. The long-range objective of this program
is to develop a variety of good-tasting nutritional beverages which
would be compatible with different consumer food preferences around
the world. In support of this objective, every effort is being made
to utilize locally available protein sources.
Considerable research and development relating to the composition
and use of such products is well underway in many parts of the world,
including the United States. However, the Latin America project
is the most advanced to date.
Three protein-containing beverages have been marketed by The Coca-cola
Export Corporation, a subsidiary of The Coca-cola Company.
Saci was the Company's first protein-containing beverage. Begin-
ning in 1968, it was test-marketed in chocolate and caramel flavors
in suburbs of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The beverage was non-carbonated.
The protein content was derived from Brazilian soybeans and seven
vitamins were added.
Brazil was selected for the test-market location because of ready
availability of local soybeans as a protein source, local machinery
and local talent to assist in the development and launching of the
new product. A further consideration was the fact that the Company-
owned bottling operation in Rio gave better flexibility in carrying
out the experiment.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/phpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 420,
"image": "phpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "phpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 466
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nThe CocaCola Company\nATLANTA, GEORGIA\nADDRESS REPLY TO\nFIDELES KLOECKLER\nP. O. DRAWER 1734\nPUBLIC RELATIONS DEPARTMENT\nATLANTA, GA. 30301\nNovember 1, 1972\n(404) 897-2121\nMs. Catherine Lerza\nNutrition Coordinator\nWashington Ecology Center\n2000 \"P\" Street, N. W. , Room 612\nWashington, D. C.\n20036\nDear Ms. Lerza:\nOur Research Department has shared with us your letter expressing\ninterest in our development of protein beverages. We will be glad\nto attempt to answer your questions.\nThe Coca-Cola Company for several years has been involved in the\nresearch and development of refreshing beverages that contain pro-\ntein, vitamins and minerals. The long-range objective of this program\nis to develop a variety of good-tasting nutritional beverages which\nwould be compatible with different consumer food preferences around\nthe world. In support of this objective, every effort is being made\nto utilize locally available protein sources.\nConsiderable research and development relating to the composition\nand use of such products is well underway in many parts of the world,\nincluding the United States. However, the Latin America project\nis the most advanced to date.\nThree protein-containing beverages have been marketed by The Coca-cola\nExport Corporation, a subsidiary of The Coca-cola Company.\nSaci was the Company's first protein-containing beverage. Begin-\nning in 1968, it was test-marketed in chocolate and caramel flavors\nin suburbs of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The beverage was non-carbonated.\nThe protein content was derived from Brazilian soybeans and seven\nvitamins were added.\nBrazil was selected for the test-market location because of ready\navailability of local soybeans as a protein source, local machinery\nand local talent to assist in the development and launching of the\nnew product. A further consideration was the fact that the Company-\nowned bottling operation in Rio gave better flexibility in carrying\nout the experiment.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/phpj0226\n\nQuestion: what was the company's first protein containing beverage?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Saci",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
845
|
what is the page number mentioned in this letter?
|
-3-
|
Page 3
Ms. Catherine Lerza
Washington Ecology Center
-3-
November 1, 1972
combination per child) . The product has been provided free of charge to
several Atlanta schools for several months and student acceptance has
been good.
Again, we appreciate your interest in our developments and hope the
above will be helpful.
Sincerely ,
(han ) Silver /Flockly
Public Relations Assistant
FK:sga
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/phpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 421,
"image": "phpj0226_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "phpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 128
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nMs. Catherine Lerza\nWashington Ecology Center\n-3-\nNovember 1, 1972\ncombination per child) . The product has been provided free of charge to\nseveral Atlanta schools for several months and student acceptance has\nbeen good.\nAgain, we appreciate your interest in our developments and hope the\nabove will be helpful.\nSincerely ,\n(han ) Silver /Flockly\nPublic Relations Assistant\nFK:sga\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/phpj0226\n\nQuestion: what is the page number mentioned in this letter?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "-3-",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
846
|
who is the senior vice president ?
|
Alan L. Hoffman
|
Page 1
PEPSICO
Alan L. Hoffman
Senior Vice President
Global Public Policy and Government Affairs
April 15, 2014
Mr. Michael Jacobson
Executive Director
Center for Science in the Public Interest
1220 L Street, NW
Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005-4053
Dear Michael:
As a global company operating in more than 220 countries, PepsiCo faces a wide array of public
policy challenges. On a daily basis, my office handles diverse issues ranging from human rights to
trade to environmental sustainability. One of the more vexing issues is the appropriate role of
genetically modified ("GM") ingredients in our food supply.
This issue is so challenging because, even though the World Health Organization, the American
Medical Association, the Food and Drug Administration, the National Academy of Sciences, and the
American Association for the Advancement of Science have all determined that foods containing GM
ingredients are safe to eat, some consumers have concerns.
In addition to being safe, GM ingredients provide other benefits. For example, some GM crops are
able to resist disease better and use less water and pesticides than their non-GM counterparts
Moreover, food demand is expected to increase by at least 70% by mid-century, and GM foods can
play an important role in assuring an adequate food supply. In fact, many advocates for developing
populations, including Microsoft founder Bill Gates, support the use of GM ingredients as a way to
feed the world.
Notwithstanding these benefits, I know that many consumers have questions about these foods. To
his end, I am proud to say that PepsiCo supports federal legislation that would establish a
mechanism to help consumers identify products not containing GM ingredients.
I understand that people have strongly held views about the use of GM ingredients and look forward
o working with all interested parties in reaching a solution that addresses consumer concerns while
allowing the world to continue to benefit from the great potential that GM products have to offer.
All my best,
Alan L. Hoffman
700 Anderson Hill Road, Purchase, New York 10577
Bus: 914-253-3600
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/gjpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 423,
"image": "gjpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "gjpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 478
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPEPSICO\nAlan L. Hoffman\nSenior Vice President\nGlobal Public Policy and Government Affairs\nApril 15, 2014\nMr. Michael Jacobson\nExecutive Director\nCenter for Science in the Public Interest\n1220 L Street, NW\nSuite 300\nWashington, DC 20005-4053\nDear Michael:\nAs a global company operating in more than 220 countries, PepsiCo faces a wide array of public\npolicy challenges. On a daily basis, my office handles diverse issues ranging from human rights to\ntrade to environmental sustainability. One of the more vexing issues is the appropriate role of\ngenetically modified (\"GM\") ingredients in our food supply.\nThis issue is so challenging because, even though the World Health Organization, the American\nMedical Association, the Food and Drug Administration, the National Academy of Sciences, and the\nAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science have all determined that foods containing GM\ningredients are safe to eat, some consumers have concerns.\nIn addition to being safe, GM ingredients provide other benefits. For example, some GM crops are\nable to resist disease better and use less water and pesticides than their non-GM counterparts\nMoreover, food demand is expected to increase by at least 70% by mid-century, and GM foods can\nplay an important role in assuring an adequate food supply. In fact, many advocates for developing\npopulations, including Microsoft founder Bill Gates, support the use of GM ingredients as a way to\nfeed the world.\nNotwithstanding these benefits, I know that many consumers have questions about these foods. To\nhis end, I am proud to say that PepsiCo supports federal legislation that would establish a\nmechanism to help consumers identify products not containing GM ingredients.\nI understand that people have strongly held views about the use of GM ingredients and look forward\no working with all interested parties in reaching a solution that addresses consumer concerns while\nallowing the world to continue to benefit from the great potential that GM products have to offer.\nAll my best,\nAlan L. Hoffman\n700 Anderson Hill Road, Purchase, New York 10577\nBus: 914-253-3600\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/gjpj0226\n\nQuestion: who is the senior vice president ?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Alan L. Hoffman",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
847
|
What kind of study is mentioned in this letter?
|
Study on soft drinks
|
Page 1
July 29. 1972
ir. Robert L. Goldsmith
Darkoting Director
Boys' Life
271 Madison Avo.
New York, NY 10016
Dear Ir. Goldsmith:
Thank you very much for sending me the study on soft
drinks. I have two further questions that you may be able
to answer, First, how many boys were surveyed and what kind
of a turvey was it (telephone, form in Boys' Life, IBli cards
at scout mooting, otc. )?
The consumption chart on page li is astonishing. Can
we rollably assume that no boys drink abro soft drinks a
day and that 8% drink eight or more c. day?! I just can't
bellove that anyone would drink ton or more a day, as the
chart indicates. Drinking that many would imply theat those
boys obtain half their caloric intake from soda! It sounds
more like those responses should be chalked up to adolescent
mischievousness.
Michael F. Jacobson, Ph.D.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mhpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 425,
"image": "mhpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mhpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 263
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nJuly 29. 1972\nir. Robert L. Goldsmith\nDarkoting Director\nBoys' Life\n271 Madison Avo.\nNew York, NY 10016\nDear Ir. Goldsmith:\nThank you very much for sending me the study on soft\ndrinks. I have two further questions that you may be able\nto answer, First, how many boys were surveyed and what kind\nof a turvey was it (telephone, form in Boys' Life, IBli cards\nat scout mooting, otc. )?\nThe consumption chart on page li is astonishing. Can\nwe rollably assume that no boys drink abro soft drinks a\nday and that 8% drink eight or more c. day?! I just can't\nbellove that anyone would drink ton or more a day, as the\nchart indicates. Drinking that many would imply theat those\nboys obtain half their caloric intake from soda! It sounds\nmore like those responses should be chalked up to adolescent\nmischievousness.\nMichael F. Jacobson, Ph.D.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mhpj0226\n\nQuestion: What kind of study is mentioned in this letter?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Study on soft drinks",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
848
|
what is the date mentioned in the letter?
|
April 15,2014
|
Page 1
PEPSICO
Alan L. Hoffman
Senior Vice President
Global Public Policy and Government Affairs
April 15, 2014
Mr. Michael Jacobson
Executive Director
Center for Science in the Public Interest
1220 L Street, NW
Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005-4053
Dear Michael:
As a global company operating in more than 220 countries, PepsiCo faces a wide array of public
policy challenges. On a daily basis, my office handles diverse issues ranging from human rights to
trade to environmental sustainability. One of the more vexing issues is the appropriate role of
genetically modified ("GM") ingredients in our food supply.
This issue is so challenging because, even though the World Health Organization, the American
Medical Association, the Food and Drug Administration, the National Academy of Sciences, and the
American Association for the Advancement of Science have all determined that foods containing GM
ingredients are safe to eat, some consumers have concerns.
In addition to being safe, GM ingredients provide other benefits. For example, some GM crops are
able to resist disease better and use less water and pesticides than their non-GM counterparts
Moreover, food demand is expected to increase by at least 70% by mid-century, and GM foods can
play an important role in assuring an adequate food supply. In fact, many advocates for developing
populations, including Microsoft founder Bill Gates, support the use of GM ingredients as a way to
feed the world.
Notwithstanding these benefits, I know that many consumers have questions about these foods. To
his end, I am proud to say that PepsiCo supports federal legislation that would establish a
mechanism to help consumers identify products not containing GM ingredients.
I understand that people have strongly held views about the use of GM ingredients and look forward
o working with all interested parties in reaching a solution that addresses consumer concerns while
allowing the world to continue to benefit from the great potential that GM products have to offer.
All my best,
Alan L. Hoffman
700 Anderson Hill Road, Purchase, New York 10577
Bus: 914-253-3600
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/gjpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 423,
"image": "gjpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "gjpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 482
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPEPSICO\nAlan L. Hoffman\nSenior Vice President\nGlobal Public Policy and Government Affairs\nApril 15, 2014\nMr. Michael Jacobson\nExecutive Director\nCenter for Science in the Public Interest\n1220 L Street, NW\nSuite 300\nWashington, DC 20005-4053\nDear Michael:\nAs a global company operating in more than 220 countries, PepsiCo faces a wide array of public\npolicy challenges. On a daily basis, my office handles diverse issues ranging from human rights to\ntrade to environmental sustainability. One of the more vexing issues is the appropriate role of\ngenetically modified (\"GM\") ingredients in our food supply.\nThis issue is so challenging because, even though the World Health Organization, the American\nMedical Association, the Food and Drug Administration, the National Academy of Sciences, and the\nAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science have all determined that foods containing GM\ningredients are safe to eat, some consumers have concerns.\nIn addition to being safe, GM ingredients provide other benefits. For example, some GM crops are\nable to resist disease better and use less water and pesticides than their non-GM counterparts\nMoreover, food demand is expected to increase by at least 70% by mid-century, and GM foods can\nplay an important role in assuring an adequate food supply. In fact, many advocates for developing\npopulations, including Microsoft founder Bill Gates, support the use of GM ingredients as a way to\nfeed the world.\nNotwithstanding these benefits, I know that many consumers have questions about these foods. To\nhis end, I am proud to say that PepsiCo supports federal legislation that would establish a\nmechanism to help consumers identify products not containing GM ingredients.\nI understand that people have strongly held views about the use of GM ingredients and look forward\no working with all interested parties in reaching a solution that addresses consumer concerns while\nallowing the world to continue to benefit from the great potential that GM products have to offer.\nAll my best,\nAlan L. Hoffman\n700 Anderson Hill Road, Purchase, New York 10577\nBus: 914-253-3600\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/gjpj0226\n\nQuestion: what is the date mentioned in the letter?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "April 15,2014",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
850
|
who is the executive director?
|
Mr. Michael jacobson
|
Page 1
PEPSICO
Alan L. Hoffman
Senior Vice President
Global Public Policy and Government Affairs
April 15, 2014
Mr. Michael Jacobson
Executive Director
Center for Science in the Public Interest
1220 L Street, NW
Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005-4053
Dear Michael:
As a global company operating in more than 220 countries, PepsiCo faces a wide array of public
policy challenges. On a daily basis, my office handles diverse issues ranging from human rights to
trade to environmental sustainability. One of the more vexing issues is the appropriate role of
genetically modified ("GM") ingredients in our food supply.
This issue is so challenging because, even though the World Health Organization, the American
Medical Association, the Food and Drug Administration, the National Academy of Sciences, and the
American Association for the Advancement of Science have all determined that foods containing GM
ingredients are safe to eat, some consumers have concerns.
In addition to being safe, GM ingredients provide other benefits. For example, some GM crops are
able to resist disease better and use less water and pesticides than their non-GM counterparts
Moreover, food demand is expected to increase by at least 70% by mid-century, and GM foods can
play an important role in assuring an adequate food supply. In fact, many advocates for developing
populations, including Microsoft founder Bill Gates, support the use of GM ingredients as a way to
feed the world.
Notwithstanding these benefits, I know that many consumers have questions about these foods. To
his end, I am proud to say that PepsiCo supports federal legislation that would establish a
mechanism to help consumers identify products not containing GM ingredients.
I understand that people have strongly held views about the use of GM ingredients and look forward
o working with all interested parties in reaching a solution that addresses consumer concerns while
allowing the world to continue to benefit from the great potential that GM products have to offer.
All my best,
Alan L. Hoffman
700 Anderson Hill Road, Purchase, New York 10577
Bus: 914-253-3600
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/gjpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 423,
"image": "gjpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "gjpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 479
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPEPSICO\nAlan L. Hoffman\nSenior Vice President\nGlobal Public Policy and Government Affairs\nApril 15, 2014\nMr. Michael Jacobson\nExecutive Director\nCenter for Science in the Public Interest\n1220 L Street, NW\nSuite 300\nWashington, DC 20005-4053\nDear Michael:\nAs a global company operating in more than 220 countries, PepsiCo faces a wide array of public\npolicy challenges. On a daily basis, my office handles diverse issues ranging from human rights to\ntrade to environmental sustainability. One of the more vexing issues is the appropriate role of\ngenetically modified (\"GM\") ingredients in our food supply.\nThis issue is so challenging because, even though the World Health Organization, the American\nMedical Association, the Food and Drug Administration, the National Academy of Sciences, and the\nAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science have all determined that foods containing GM\ningredients are safe to eat, some consumers have concerns.\nIn addition to being safe, GM ingredients provide other benefits. For example, some GM crops are\nable to resist disease better and use less water and pesticides than their non-GM counterparts\nMoreover, food demand is expected to increase by at least 70% by mid-century, and GM foods can\nplay an important role in assuring an adequate food supply. In fact, many advocates for developing\npopulations, including Microsoft founder Bill Gates, support the use of GM ingredients as a way to\nfeed the world.\nNotwithstanding these benefits, I know that many consumers have questions about these foods. To\nhis end, I am proud to say that PepsiCo supports federal legislation that would establish a\nmechanism to help consumers identify products not containing GM ingredients.\nI understand that people have strongly held views about the use of GM ingredients and look forward\no working with all interested parties in reaching a solution that addresses consumer concerns while\nallowing the world to continue to benefit from the great potential that GM products have to offer.\nAll my best,\nAlan L. Hoffman\n700 Anderson Hill Road, Purchase, New York 10577\nBus: 914-253-3600\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/gjpj0226\n\nQuestion: who is the executive director?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Mr. Michael jacobson",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
851
|
where is Alan L.hoffan working ?
|
global public policy and government affairs
|
Page 1
PEPSICO
Alan L. Hoffman
Senior Vice President
Global Public Policy and Government Affairs
April 15, 2014
Mr. Michael Jacobson
Executive Director
Center for Science in the Public Interest
1220 L Street, NW
Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005-4053
Dear Michael:
As a global company operating in more than 220 countries, PepsiCo faces a wide array of public
policy challenges. On a daily basis, my office handles diverse issues ranging from human rights to
trade to environmental sustainability. One of the more vexing issues is the appropriate role of
genetically modified ("GM") ingredients in our food supply.
This issue is so challenging because, even though the World Health Organization, the American
Medical Association, the Food and Drug Administration, the National Academy of Sciences, and the
American Association for the Advancement of Science have all determined that foods containing GM
ingredients are safe to eat, some consumers have concerns.
In addition to being safe, GM ingredients provide other benefits. For example, some GM crops are
able to resist disease better and use less water and pesticides than their non-GM counterparts
Moreover, food demand is expected to increase by at least 70% by mid-century, and GM foods can
play an important role in assuring an adequate food supply. In fact, many advocates for developing
populations, including Microsoft founder Bill Gates, support the use of GM ingredients as a way to
feed the world.
Notwithstanding these benefits, I know that many consumers have questions about these foods. To
his end, I am proud to say that PepsiCo supports federal legislation that would establish a
mechanism to help consumers identify products not containing GM ingredients.
I understand that people have strongly held views about the use of GM ingredients and look forward
o working with all interested parties in reaching a solution that addresses consumer concerns while
allowing the world to continue to benefit from the great potential that GM products have to offer.
All my best,
Alan L. Hoffman
700 Anderson Hill Road, Purchase, New York 10577
Bus: 914-253-3600
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/gjpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 423,
"image": "gjpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "gjpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 482
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPEPSICO\nAlan L. Hoffman\nSenior Vice President\nGlobal Public Policy and Government Affairs\nApril 15, 2014\nMr. Michael Jacobson\nExecutive Director\nCenter for Science in the Public Interest\n1220 L Street, NW\nSuite 300\nWashington, DC 20005-4053\nDear Michael:\nAs a global company operating in more than 220 countries, PepsiCo faces a wide array of public\npolicy challenges. On a daily basis, my office handles diverse issues ranging from human rights to\ntrade to environmental sustainability. One of the more vexing issues is the appropriate role of\ngenetically modified (\"GM\") ingredients in our food supply.\nThis issue is so challenging because, even though the World Health Organization, the American\nMedical Association, the Food and Drug Administration, the National Academy of Sciences, and the\nAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science have all determined that foods containing GM\ningredients are safe to eat, some consumers have concerns.\nIn addition to being safe, GM ingredients provide other benefits. For example, some GM crops are\nable to resist disease better and use less water and pesticides than their non-GM counterparts\nMoreover, food demand is expected to increase by at least 70% by mid-century, and GM foods can\nplay an important role in assuring an adequate food supply. In fact, many advocates for developing\npopulations, including Microsoft founder Bill Gates, support the use of GM ingredients as a way to\nfeed the world.\nNotwithstanding these benefits, I know that many consumers have questions about these foods. To\nhis end, I am proud to say that PepsiCo supports federal legislation that would establish a\nmechanism to help consumers identify products not containing GM ingredients.\nI understand that people have strongly held views about the use of GM ingredients and look forward\no working with all interested parties in reaching a solution that addresses consumer concerns while\nallowing the world to continue to benefit from the great potential that GM products have to offer.\nAll my best,\nAlan L. Hoffman\n700 Anderson Hill Road, Purchase, New York 10577\nBus: 914-253-3600\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/gjpj0226\n\nQuestion: where is Alan L.hoffan working ?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "global public policy and government affairs",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
852
|
What is the date mentioned on the top of the letter ?
|
July 29, 1972
|
Page 1
July 29. 1972
ir. Robert L. Goldsmith
Darkoting Director
Boys' Life
271 Madison Avo.
New York, NY 10016
Dear Ir. Goldsmith:
Thank you very much for sending me the study on soft
drinks. I have two further questions that you may be able
to answer, First, how many boys were surveyed and what kind
of a turvey was it (telephone, form in Boys' Life, IBli cards
at scout mooting, otc. )?
The consumption chart on page li is astonishing. Can
we rollably assume that no boys drink abro soft drinks a
day and that 8% drink eight or more c. day?! I just can't
bellove that anyone would drink ton or more a day, as the
chart indicates. Drinking that many would imply theat those
boys obtain half their caloric intake from soda! It sounds
more like those responses should be chalked up to adolescent
mischievousness.
Michael F. Jacobson, Ph.D.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mhpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 425,
"image": "mhpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mhpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 268
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nJuly 29. 1972\nir. Robert L. Goldsmith\nDarkoting Director\nBoys' Life\n271 Madison Avo.\nNew York, NY 10016\nDear Ir. Goldsmith:\nThank you very much for sending me the study on soft\ndrinks. I have two further questions that you may be able\nto answer, First, how many boys were surveyed and what kind\nof a turvey was it (telephone, form in Boys' Life, IBli cards\nat scout mooting, otc. )?\nThe consumption chart on page li is astonishing. Can\nwe rollably assume that no boys drink abro soft drinks a\nday and that 8% drink eight or more c. day?! I just can't\nbellove that anyone would drink ton or more a day, as the\nchart indicates. Drinking that many would imply theat those\nboys obtain half their caloric intake from soda! It sounds\nmore like those responses should be chalked up to adolescent\nmischievousness.\nMichael F. Jacobson, Ph.D.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mhpj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the date mentioned on the top of the letter ?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "July 29, 1972",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
853
|
In how many countries global company is operating ?
|
more than 220
|
Page 1
PEPSICO
Alan L. Hoffman
Senior Vice President
Global Public Policy and Government Affairs
April 15, 2014
Mr. Michael Jacobson
Executive Director
Center for Science in the Public Interest
1220 L Street, NW
Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005-4053
Dear Michael:
As a global company operating in more than 220 countries, PepsiCo faces a wide array of public
policy challenges. On a daily basis, my office handles diverse issues ranging from human rights to
trade to environmental sustainability. One of the more vexing issues is the appropriate role of
genetically modified ("GM") ingredients in our food supply.
This issue is so challenging because, even though the World Health Organization, the American
Medical Association, the Food and Drug Administration, the National Academy of Sciences, and the
American Association for the Advancement of Science have all determined that foods containing GM
ingredients are safe to eat, some consumers have concerns.
In addition to being safe, GM ingredients provide other benefits. For example, some GM crops are
able to resist disease better and use less water and pesticides than their non-GM counterparts
Moreover, food demand is expected to increase by at least 70% by mid-century, and GM foods can
play an important role in assuring an adequate food supply. In fact, many advocates for developing
populations, including Microsoft founder Bill Gates, support the use of GM ingredients as a way to
feed the world.
Notwithstanding these benefits, I know that many consumers have questions about these foods. To
his end, I am proud to say that PepsiCo supports federal legislation that would establish a
mechanism to help consumers identify products not containing GM ingredients.
I understand that people have strongly held views about the use of GM ingredients and look forward
o working with all interested parties in reaching a solution that addresses consumer concerns while
allowing the world to continue to benefit from the great potential that GM products have to offer.
All my best,
Alan L. Hoffman
700 Anderson Hill Road, Purchase, New York 10577
Bus: 914-253-3600
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/gjpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 423,
"image": "gjpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "gjpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 480
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPEPSICO\nAlan L. Hoffman\nSenior Vice President\nGlobal Public Policy and Government Affairs\nApril 15, 2014\nMr. Michael Jacobson\nExecutive Director\nCenter for Science in the Public Interest\n1220 L Street, NW\nSuite 300\nWashington, DC 20005-4053\nDear Michael:\nAs a global company operating in more than 220 countries, PepsiCo faces a wide array of public\npolicy challenges. On a daily basis, my office handles diverse issues ranging from human rights to\ntrade to environmental sustainability. One of the more vexing issues is the appropriate role of\ngenetically modified (\"GM\") ingredients in our food supply.\nThis issue is so challenging because, even though the World Health Organization, the American\nMedical Association, the Food and Drug Administration, the National Academy of Sciences, and the\nAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science have all determined that foods containing GM\ningredients are safe to eat, some consumers have concerns.\nIn addition to being safe, GM ingredients provide other benefits. For example, some GM crops are\nable to resist disease better and use less water and pesticides than their non-GM counterparts\nMoreover, food demand is expected to increase by at least 70% by mid-century, and GM foods can\nplay an important role in assuring an adequate food supply. In fact, many advocates for developing\npopulations, including Microsoft founder Bill Gates, support the use of GM ingredients as a way to\nfeed the world.\nNotwithstanding these benefits, I know that many consumers have questions about these foods. To\nhis end, I am proud to say that PepsiCo supports federal legislation that would establish a\nmechanism to help consumers identify products not containing GM ingredients.\nI understand that people have strongly held views about the use of GM ingredients and look forward\no working with all interested parties in reaching a solution that addresses consumer concerns while\nallowing the world to continue to benefit from the great potential that GM products have to offer.\nAll my best,\nAlan L. Hoffman\n700 Anderson Hill Road, Purchase, New York 10577\nBus: 914-253-3600\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/gjpj0226\n\nQuestion: In how many countries global company is operating ?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "more than 220",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
854
|
What is the date of this letter?
|
July 29, 1972
|
Page 1
July 29. 1972
ir. Robert L. Goldsmith
Darkoting Director
Boys' Life
271 Madison Avo.
New York, NY 10016
Dear Ir. Goldsmith:
Thank you very much for sending me the study on soft
drinks. I have two further questions that you may be able
to answer, First, how many boys were surveyed and what kind
of a turvey was it (telephone, form in Boys' Life, IBli cards
at scout mooting, otc. )?
The consumption chart on page li is astonishing. Can
we rollably assume that no boys drink abro soft drinks a
day and that 8% drink eight or more c. day?! I just can't
bellove that anyone would drink ton or more a day, as the
chart indicates. Drinking that many would imply theat those
boys obtain half their caloric intake from soda! It sounds
more like those responses should be chalked up to adolescent
mischievousness.
Michael F. Jacobson, Ph.D.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mhpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 425,
"image": "mhpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mhpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 264
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nJuly 29. 1972\nir. Robert L. Goldsmith\nDarkoting Director\nBoys' Life\n271 Madison Avo.\nNew York, NY 10016\nDear Ir. Goldsmith:\nThank you very much for sending me the study on soft\ndrinks. I have two further questions that you may be able\nto answer, First, how many boys were surveyed and what kind\nof a turvey was it (telephone, form in Boys' Life, IBli cards\nat scout mooting, otc. )?\nThe consumption chart on page li is astonishing. Can\nwe rollably assume that no boys drink abro soft drinks a\nday and that 8% drink eight or more c. day?! I just can't\nbellove that anyone would drink ton or more a day, as the\nchart indicates. Drinking that many would imply theat those\nboys obtain half their caloric intake from soda! It sounds\nmore like those responses should be chalked up to adolescent\nmischievousness.\nMichael F. Jacobson, Ph.D.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mhpj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the date of this letter?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "July 29, 1972",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
855
|
who is the president and chief operating officer?
|
John R. Alm
|
Page 1
". . .
Coca-cola F
Coca Cola Enterprises Inc.
** RECEIVED
John R. Alm
Jul 16,2003 14:31:29 WS# 15
03 JUL 16 MII: 57
P.O. Box 723040
President and
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY
Chief Operating Officer
CORRESPONDENCE
Atlanta, GA 31139-0040
CONTROL CENTER
ANTRIAL. CENTER
770 989-300
770 989-3784 Fax
July 11, 2003
The Honorable Tommy G. Thompson
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
200 Independence Avenue; S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20201
Dear Secretary Thompson:
I wanted to take this opportunity to thank you for taking the time out of your very busy
schedule to meet with us to discuss the growing obesity problem in America and the role
businesses like those of us in the Coca-cola system can play in addressing this public health
issue.
Being the market leader in the beverage industry, we believe we have a role and;
responsibility to be a part of the solution to positively impact and raise awareness of the
obesity problem. .In our meeting yesterday, you asked us to provide what we are currently
working on to assist your department's efforts in combating this serious issue. As John
Downs, Clyde Tuggle, and I outlined in our presentation, below are our five major initiatives:
1. Provide consumers a wide array of beverage choices through innovation from pure
hydration to fun and refreshment, such as reduced calorie Minute Maid light products,
bottled water, and milk-based beverages with the fewest calories in the category.
2. Reaffirm our decades-old strict policy and guidelines regarding the marketing and
advertising of our brands to children.
3. Conduct ourselves in the appropriate way through our leading business practices and
model guidelines with our schools and school districts. We want to be respectful and
responsive to the wishes and requests of a school/school district to provide their
choice and selection of a wide variety of beverages that are appropriate to students'
age, nutritional needs, and physical activity level.
a. . No advance payments for long-term contracts with schools. . .
we::. ... b.. Nutritional information for beverages sold in schools will be displayed on every
. . :..;. vending machine.
1:1: ;. C: :Wwhen responding to a school. or school district's request for their choice of
beverage selections, we offer specific beverage availability recommendations
for elementary, middle, and high schools.
printed on 100% Recycled Paper
recyclable resources
0716 20030 058
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rfpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 424,
"image": "rfpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rfpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 606
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\n\". . .\nCoca-cola F\nCoca Cola Enterprises Inc.\n** RECEIVED\nJohn R. Alm\nJul 16,2003 14:31:29 WS# 15\n03 JUL 16 MII: 57\nP.O. Box 723040\nPresident and\nOFFICE OF THE SECRETARY\nChief Operating Officer\nCORRESPONDENCE\nAtlanta, GA 31139-0040\nCONTROL CENTER\nANTRIAL. CENTER\n770 989-300\n770 989-3784 Fax\nJuly 11, 2003\nThe Honorable Tommy G. Thompson\nU.S. Department of Health and Human Services\n200 Independence Avenue; S.W.\nWashington, D.C. 20201\nDear Secretary Thompson:\nI wanted to take this opportunity to thank you for taking the time out of your very busy\nschedule to meet with us to discuss the growing obesity problem in America and the role\nbusinesses like those of us in the Coca-cola system can play in addressing this public health\nissue.\nBeing the market leader in the beverage industry, we believe we have a role and;\nresponsibility to be a part of the solution to positively impact and raise awareness of the\nobesity problem. .In our meeting yesterday, you asked us to provide what we are currently\nworking on to assist your department's efforts in combating this serious issue. As John\nDowns, Clyde Tuggle, and I outlined in our presentation, below are our five major initiatives:\n1. Provide consumers a wide array of beverage choices through innovation from pure\nhydration to fun and refreshment, such as reduced calorie Minute Maid light products,\nbottled water, and milk-based beverages with the fewest calories in the category.\n2. Reaffirm our decades-old strict policy and guidelines regarding the marketing and\nadvertising of our brands to children.\n3. Conduct ourselves in the appropriate way through our leading business practices and\nmodel guidelines with our schools and school districts. We want to be respectful and\nresponsive to the wishes and requests of a school/school district to provide their\nchoice and selection of a wide variety of beverages that are appropriate to students'\nage, nutritional needs, and physical activity level.\na. . No advance payments for long-term contracts with schools. . .\nwe::. ... b.. Nutritional information for beverages sold in schools will be displayed on every\n. . :..;. vending machine.\n1:1: ;. C: :Wwhen responding to a school. or school district's request for their choice of\nbeverage selections, we offer specific beverage availability recommendations\nfor elementary, middle, and high schools.\nprinted on 100% Recycled Paper\nrecyclable resources\n0716 20030 058\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rfpj0226\n\nQuestion: who is the president and chief operating officer?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "John R. Alm",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
860
|
what is the 2nd point inthe letter ?
|
Reaffirm our decades-old strict policy and guidelines regarding the marketing and advertising of our brands to children.
|
Page 1
". . .
Coca-cola F
Coca Cola Enterprises Inc.
** RECEIVED
John R. Alm
Jul 16,2003 14:31:29 WS# 15
03 JUL 16 MII: 57
P.O. Box 723040
President and
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY
Chief Operating Officer
CORRESPONDENCE
Atlanta, GA 31139-0040
CONTROL CENTER
ANTRIAL. CENTER
770 989-300
770 989-3784 Fax
July 11, 2003
The Honorable Tommy G. Thompson
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
200 Independence Avenue; S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20201
Dear Secretary Thompson:
I wanted to take this opportunity to thank you for taking the time out of your very busy
schedule to meet with us to discuss the growing obesity problem in America and the role
businesses like those of us in the Coca-cola system can play in addressing this public health
issue.
Being the market leader in the beverage industry, we believe we have a role and;
responsibility to be a part of the solution to positively impact and raise awareness of the
obesity problem. .In our meeting yesterday, you asked us to provide what we are currently
working on to assist your department's efforts in combating this serious issue. As John
Downs, Clyde Tuggle, and I outlined in our presentation, below are our five major initiatives:
1. Provide consumers a wide array of beverage choices through innovation from pure
hydration to fun and refreshment, such as reduced calorie Minute Maid light products,
bottled water, and milk-based beverages with the fewest calories in the category.
2. Reaffirm our decades-old strict policy and guidelines regarding the marketing and
advertising of our brands to children.
3. Conduct ourselves in the appropriate way through our leading business practices and
model guidelines with our schools and school districts. We want to be respectful and
responsive to the wishes and requests of a school/school district to provide their
choice and selection of a wide variety of beverages that are appropriate to students'
age, nutritional needs, and physical activity level.
a. . No advance payments for long-term contracts with schools. . .
we::. ... b.. Nutritional information for beverages sold in schools will be displayed on every
. . :..;. vending machine.
1:1: ;. C: :Wwhen responding to a school. or school district's request for their choice of
beverage selections, we offer specific beverage availability recommendations
for elementary, middle, and high schools.
printed on 100% Recycled Paper
recyclable resources
0716 20030 058
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rfpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 424,
"image": "rfpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rfpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 624
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\n\". . .\nCoca-cola F\nCoca Cola Enterprises Inc.\n** RECEIVED\nJohn R. Alm\nJul 16,2003 14:31:29 WS# 15\n03 JUL 16 MII: 57\nP.O. Box 723040\nPresident and\nOFFICE OF THE SECRETARY\nChief Operating Officer\nCORRESPONDENCE\nAtlanta, GA 31139-0040\nCONTROL CENTER\nANTRIAL. CENTER\n770 989-300\n770 989-3784 Fax\nJuly 11, 2003\nThe Honorable Tommy G. Thompson\nU.S. Department of Health and Human Services\n200 Independence Avenue; S.W.\nWashington, D.C. 20201\nDear Secretary Thompson:\nI wanted to take this opportunity to thank you for taking the time out of your very busy\nschedule to meet with us to discuss the growing obesity problem in America and the role\nbusinesses like those of us in the Coca-cola system can play in addressing this public health\nissue.\nBeing the market leader in the beverage industry, we believe we have a role and;\nresponsibility to be a part of the solution to positively impact and raise awareness of the\nobesity problem. .In our meeting yesterday, you asked us to provide what we are currently\nworking on to assist your department's efforts in combating this serious issue. As John\nDowns, Clyde Tuggle, and I outlined in our presentation, below are our five major initiatives:\n1. Provide consumers a wide array of beverage choices through innovation from pure\nhydration to fun and refreshment, such as reduced calorie Minute Maid light products,\nbottled water, and milk-based beverages with the fewest calories in the category.\n2. Reaffirm our decades-old strict policy and guidelines regarding the marketing and\nadvertising of our brands to children.\n3. Conduct ourselves in the appropriate way through our leading business practices and\nmodel guidelines with our schools and school districts. We want to be respectful and\nresponsive to the wishes and requests of a school/school district to provide their\nchoice and selection of a wide variety of beverages that are appropriate to students'\nage, nutritional needs, and physical activity level.\na. . No advance payments for long-term contracts with schools. . .\nwe::. ... b.. Nutritional information for beverages sold in schools will be displayed on every\n. . :..;. vending machine.\n1:1: ;. C: :Wwhen responding to a school. or school district's request for their choice of\nbeverage selections, we offer specific beverage availability recommendations\nfor elementary, middle, and high schools.\nprinted on 100% Recycled Paper\nrecyclable resources\n0716 20030 058\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rfpj0226\n\nQuestion: what is the 2nd point inthe letter ?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Reaffirm our decades-old strict policy and guidelines regarding the marketing and advertising of our brands to children.",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
862
|
What sort of document series does it covers ?
|
Soft Drink Ingredient Series
|
Page 2
ARRI1 1987
SOFTDRINKS
AND
CAFFEINE
. .
1
Soft Drink Ingredient Series
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/pkpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 437,
"image": "pkpj0226_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "pkpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 67
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nARRI1 1987\nSOFTDRINKS\nAND\nCAFFEINE\n. .\n1\nSoft Drink Ingredient Series\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/pkpj0226\n\nQuestion: What sort of document series does it covers ?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Soft Drink Ingredient Series",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
864
|
What is the title of the series?
|
SOFT DRINKS AND CAFFEINE
|
Page 2
ARRI1 1987
SOFTDRINKS
AND
CAFFEINE
. .
1
Soft Drink Ingredient Series
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/pkpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 437,
"image": "pkpj0226_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "pkpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 71
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nARRI1 1987\nSOFTDRINKS\nAND\nCAFFEINE\n. .\n1\nSoft Drink Ingredient Series\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/pkpj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the title of the series?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "SOFT DRINKS AND CAFFEINE",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
865
|
What is the title of the document?
|
SOFT DRINKS AND CAFFEINE
|
Page 2
ARRI1 1987
SOFTDRINKS
AND
CAFFEINE
. .
1
Soft Drink Ingredient Series
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/pkpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 437,
"image": "pkpj0226_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "pkpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 71
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nARRI1 1987\nSOFTDRINKS\nAND\nCAFFEINE\n. .\n1\nSoft Drink Ingredient Series\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/pkpj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the title of the document?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "SOFT DRINKS AND CAFFEINE",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
870
|
What is the fullform of ils?
|
international litigation services
|
Page 3
ls
INTERNATIONAL
LITIGATION
SERVICES
CERTIFICATION OF TRANSLATION
International Litigation Services, a company specializing in international cases and foreign language
document processing, certifies the following:
International Litigation Services has retained a professional translator for the attached Japanese
into English document. The document is referred to as:
"TAK-SEITAT-00061905P-0001"
I affirm that such translation has been prepared by a duly qualified translator, who has confirmed
that such translation is, to the best of his/ her knowledge and belief, a true and accurate
translation in English of the corresponding Japanese document.
I declare under the penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct, Notwithstanding the
foregoing affirmations, no liability is assumed for errors and omissions in the translation of the
attached document.
Executed on this 6th day of October 2013, in Aliso Viejo, California.
Joeph thorpe
Joseph Thorpe
Managing Director
International Litigation Services, Inc.
International Uffigation Services Inc. > 65 Enterprise . Aliso Viejo, California 32656
Phone: 828.313.4457 s Fax: 213.674.4191 . [email protected] . WWW.isTEAM.com
NEW YORK . LOS ANGELES . LAS VEGAS * ORANGE COUNTY
Source: https://www.indupsy$8coooosts.ucsf.edu/docs/tpjf0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 455,
"image": "tpjf0226_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "tpjf0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 328
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nls\nINTERNATIONAL\nLITIGATION\nSERVICES\nCERTIFICATION OF TRANSLATION\nInternational Litigation Services, a company specializing in international cases and foreign language\ndocument processing, certifies the following:\nInternational Litigation Services has retained a professional translator for the attached Japanese\ninto English document. The document is referred to as:\n\"TAK-SEITAT-00061905P-0001\"\nI affirm that such translation has been prepared by a duly qualified translator, who has confirmed\nthat such translation is, to the best of his/ her knowledge and belief, a true and accurate\ntranslation in English of the corresponding Japanese document.\nI declare under the penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct, Notwithstanding the\nforegoing affirmations, no liability is assumed for errors and omissions in the translation of the\nattached document.\nExecuted on this 6th day of October 2013, in Aliso Viejo, California.\nJoeph thorpe\nJoseph Thorpe\nManaging Director\nInternational Litigation Services, Inc.\nInternational Uffigation Services Inc. > 65 Enterprise . Aliso Viejo, California 32656\nPhone: 828.313.4457 s Fax: 213.674.4191 . [email protected] . WWW.isTEAM.com\nNEW YORK . LOS ANGELES . LAS VEGAS * ORANGE COUNTY\nSource: https://www.indupsy$8coooosts.ucsf.edu/docs/tpjf0226\n\nQuestion: What is the fullform of ils?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "international litigation services",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
871
|
What type of certification is mentioned in this document?
|
CERTIFICATION OF TRANSLATION
|
Page 3
ls
INTERNATIONAL
LITIGATION
SERVICES
CERTIFICATION OF TRANSLATION
International Litigation Services, a company specializing in international cases and foreign language
document processing, certifies the following:
International Litigation Services has retained a professional translator for the attached Japanese
into English document. The document is referred to as:
"TAK-SEITAT-00061905P-0001"
I affirm that such translation has been prepared by a duly qualified translator, who has confirmed
that such translation is, to the best of his/ her knowledge and belief, a true and accurate
translation in English of the corresponding Japanese document.
I declare under the penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct, Notwithstanding the
foregoing affirmations, no liability is assumed for errors and omissions in the translation of the
attached document.
Executed on this 6th day of October 2013, in Aliso Viejo, California.
Joeph thorpe
Joseph Thorpe
Managing Director
International Litigation Services, Inc.
International Uffigation Services Inc. > 65 Enterprise . Aliso Viejo, California 32656
Phone: 828.313.4457 s Fax: 213.674.4191 . [email protected] . WWW.isTEAM.com
NEW YORK . LOS ANGELES . LAS VEGAS * ORANGE COUNTY
Source: https://www.indupsy$8coooosts.ucsf.edu/docs/tpjf0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 455,
"image": "tpjf0226_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "tpjf0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 333
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nls\nINTERNATIONAL\nLITIGATION\nSERVICES\nCERTIFICATION OF TRANSLATION\nInternational Litigation Services, a company specializing in international cases and foreign language\ndocument processing, certifies the following:\nInternational Litigation Services has retained a professional translator for the attached Japanese\ninto English document. The document is referred to as:\n\"TAK-SEITAT-00061905P-0001\"\nI affirm that such translation has been prepared by a duly qualified translator, who has confirmed\nthat such translation is, to the best of his/ her knowledge and belief, a true and accurate\ntranslation in English of the corresponding Japanese document.\nI declare under the penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct, Notwithstanding the\nforegoing affirmations, no liability is assumed for errors and omissions in the translation of the\nattached document.\nExecuted on this 6th day of October 2013, in Aliso Viejo, California.\nJoeph thorpe\nJoseph Thorpe\nManaging Director\nInternational Litigation Services, Inc.\nInternational Uffigation Services Inc. > 65 Enterprise . Aliso Viejo, California 32656\nPhone: 828.313.4457 s Fax: 213.674.4191 . [email protected] . WWW.isTEAM.com\nNEW YORK . LOS ANGELES . LAS VEGAS * ORANGE COUNTY\nSource: https://www.indupsy$8coooosts.ucsf.edu/docs/tpjf0226\n\nQuestion: What type of certification is mentioned in this document?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "CERTIFICATION OF TRANSLATION",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
872
|
Who is the Managing Director of International Litigation Services, Inc?
|
joseph thorpe
|
Page 3
ls
INTERNATIONAL
LITIGATION
SERVICES
CERTIFICATION OF TRANSLATION
International Litigation Services, a company specializing in international cases and foreign language
document processing, certifies the following:
International Litigation Services has retained a professional translator for the attached Japanese
into English document. The document is referred to as:
"TAK-SEITAT-00061905P-0001"
I affirm that such translation has been prepared by a duly qualified translator, who has confirmed
that such translation is, to the best of his/ her knowledge and belief, a true and accurate
translation in English of the corresponding Japanese document.
I declare under the penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct, Notwithstanding the
foregoing affirmations, no liability is assumed for errors and omissions in the translation of the
attached document.
Executed on this 6th day of October 2013, in Aliso Viejo, California.
Joeph thorpe
Joseph Thorpe
Managing Director
International Litigation Services, Inc.
International Uffigation Services Inc. > 65 Enterprise . Aliso Viejo, California 32656
Phone: 828.313.4457 s Fax: 213.674.4191 . [email protected] . WWW.isTEAM.com
NEW YORK . LOS ANGELES . LAS VEGAS * ORANGE COUNTY
Source: https://www.indupsy$8coooosts.ucsf.edu/docs/tpjf0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 455,
"image": "tpjf0226_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "tpjf0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 335
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nls\nINTERNATIONAL\nLITIGATION\nSERVICES\nCERTIFICATION OF TRANSLATION\nInternational Litigation Services, a company specializing in international cases and foreign language\ndocument processing, certifies the following:\nInternational Litigation Services has retained a professional translator for the attached Japanese\ninto English document. The document is referred to as:\n\"TAK-SEITAT-00061905P-0001\"\nI affirm that such translation has been prepared by a duly qualified translator, who has confirmed\nthat such translation is, to the best of his/ her knowledge and belief, a true and accurate\ntranslation in English of the corresponding Japanese document.\nI declare under the penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct, Notwithstanding the\nforegoing affirmations, no liability is assumed for errors and omissions in the translation of the\nattached document.\nExecuted on this 6th day of October 2013, in Aliso Viejo, California.\nJoeph thorpe\nJoseph Thorpe\nManaging Director\nInternational Litigation Services, Inc.\nInternational Uffigation Services Inc. > 65 Enterprise . Aliso Viejo, California 32656\nPhone: 828.313.4457 s Fax: 213.674.4191 . [email protected] . WWW.isTEAM.com\nNEW YORK . LOS ANGELES . LAS VEGAS * ORANGE COUNTY\nSource: https://www.indupsy$8coooosts.ucsf.edu/docs/tpjf0226\n\nQuestion: Who is the Managing Director of International Litigation Services, Inc?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "joseph thorpe",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
874
|
what is the heading of the document of the document
|
memorandum of meeting
|
Page 1
Mike -
you wanted
Memorandum of Meeting
.:. .
Date:
May 5, 1978
Between:
Mr. William W. Goodrich, Institute of Shortening and Edible Oils, Inc.
Mr. Robert J. Wager, American Bakers Association
Mr. Thomas B. House, American Frozen Food Institute
Mr. Richard Lyng, American Meat Institute
Mr. George W. Koch, Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc.
. .:.
Mr. Charles J. Carey, National Food Processors Association
and
Dr. Donald Kennedy, Commissioner, FDA
Mr. Sherwin Gardner, Deputy Commissioner, FDA
Mr. Thomas Crumbly, Executive Assistant to the Commissioner, FDA
Ms. Ellen Williams, Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination, FDA
Mr. Thomas L. Hooker, Office of Policy Coordination, FDA
Mr. J. P. Hile, Associate Commissioner for Regulatory Affairs, FDA
Mr. Robert C. Wetherell, Jr., Office of Legislative Services, FDA
Mr. Stuart Pape, Office of General Counsel, FDA
Dra Howard Roberts, Acting Director, BF
Mr. Taylor Quinn, Associate Director for Compliance, BF
Dr. Robert Schaffner, Associate Director for Technology, BF
Mr. Joseph H. Prendergast, Executive Secretariat, OC
Time: 4:00 - 5:10 p.m.
.:.
Place:
Commissioner's FB#/8 Conference Room
Subject: Labeling
Mr. Goodrich opened the meeting stating it was his desire and the desire
of other visitors to participate in the discussion of possible labeling
changes in the interest of FDA law. He cautioned the Commissioner
not to get set on a fixed deadline to determine new labeling requirements--
to take as long as necessary to avoid controversy. Mr. Goodrich's
opening remarks included the following:
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/kgpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 433,
"image": "kgpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "kgpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 428
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nMike -\nyou wanted\nMemorandum of Meeting\n.:. .\nDate:\nMay 5, 1978\nBetween:\nMr. William W. Goodrich, Institute of Shortening and Edible Oils, Inc.\nMr. Robert J. Wager, American Bakers Association\nMr. Thomas B. House, American Frozen Food Institute\nMr. Richard Lyng, American Meat Institute\nMr. George W. Koch, Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc.\n. .:.\nMr. Charles J. Carey, National Food Processors Association\nand\nDr. Donald Kennedy, Commissioner, FDA\nMr. Sherwin Gardner, Deputy Commissioner, FDA\nMr. Thomas Crumbly, Executive Assistant to the Commissioner, FDA\nMs. Ellen Williams, Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination, FDA\nMr. Thomas L. Hooker, Office of Policy Coordination, FDA\nMr. J. P. Hile, Associate Commissioner for Regulatory Affairs, FDA\nMr. Robert C. Wetherell, Jr., Office of Legislative Services, FDA\nMr. Stuart Pape, Office of General Counsel, FDA\nDra Howard Roberts, Acting Director, BF\nMr. Taylor Quinn, Associate Director for Compliance, BF\nDr. Robert Schaffner, Associate Director for Technology, BF\nMr. Joseph H. Prendergast, Executive Secretariat, OC\nTime: 4:00 - 5:10 p.m.\n.:.\nPlace:\nCommissioner's FB#/8 Conference Room\nSubject: Labeling\nMr. Goodrich opened the meeting stating it was his desire and the desire\nof other visitors to participate in the discussion of possible labeling\nchanges in the interest of FDA law. He cautioned the Commissioner\nnot to get set on a fixed deadline to determine new labeling requirements--\nto take as long as necessary to avoid controversy. Mr. Goodrich's\nopening remarks included the following:\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/kgpj0226\n\nQuestion: what is the heading of the document of the document",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "memorandum of meeting",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
877
|
What place is mentioned in document
|
commissioner's fb#8 conference room
|
Page 1
Mike -
you wanted
Memorandum of Meeting
.:. .
Date:
May 5, 1978
Between:
Mr. William W. Goodrich, Institute of Shortening and Edible Oils, Inc.
Mr. Robert J. Wager, American Bakers Association
Mr. Thomas B. House, American Frozen Food Institute
Mr. Richard Lyng, American Meat Institute
Mr. George W. Koch, Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc.
. .:.
Mr. Charles J. Carey, National Food Processors Association
and
Dr. Donald Kennedy, Commissioner, FDA
Mr. Sherwin Gardner, Deputy Commissioner, FDA
Mr. Thomas Crumbly, Executive Assistant to the Commissioner, FDA
Ms. Ellen Williams, Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination, FDA
Mr. Thomas L. Hooker, Office of Policy Coordination, FDA
Mr. J. P. Hile, Associate Commissioner for Regulatory Affairs, FDA
Mr. Robert C. Wetherell, Jr., Office of Legislative Services, FDA
Mr. Stuart Pape, Office of General Counsel, FDA
Dra Howard Roberts, Acting Director, BF
Mr. Taylor Quinn, Associate Director for Compliance, BF
Dr. Robert Schaffner, Associate Director for Technology, BF
Mr. Joseph H. Prendergast, Executive Secretariat, OC
Time: 4:00 - 5:10 p.m.
.:.
Place:
Commissioner's FB#/8 Conference Room
Subject: Labeling
Mr. Goodrich opened the meeting stating it was his desire and the desire
of other visitors to participate in the discussion of possible labeling
changes in the interest of FDA law. He cautioned the Commissioner
not to get set on a fixed deadline to determine new labeling requirements--
to take as long as necessary to avoid controversy. Mr. Goodrich's
opening remarks included the following:
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/kgpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 433,
"image": "kgpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "kgpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 428
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nMike -\nyou wanted\nMemorandum of Meeting\n.:. .\nDate:\nMay 5, 1978\nBetween:\nMr. William W. Goodrich, Institute of Shortening and Edible Oils, Inc.\nMr. Robert J. Wager, American Bakers Association\nMr. Thomas B. House, American Frozen Food Institute\nMr. Richard Lyng, American Meat Institute\nMr. George W. Koch, Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc.\n. .:.\nMr. Charles J. Carey, National Food Processors Association\nand\nDr. Donald Kennedy, Commissioner, FDA\nMr. Sherwin Gardner, Deputy Commissioner, FDA\nMr. Thomas Crumbly, Executive Assistant to the Commissioner, FDA\nMs. Ellen Williams, Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination, FDA\nMr. Thomas L. Hooker, Office of Policy Coordination, FDA\nMr. J. P. Hile, Associate Commissioner for Regulatory Affairs, FDA\nMr. Robert C. Wetherell, Jr., Office of Legislative Services, FDA\nMr. Stuart Pape, Office of General Counsel, FDA\nDra Howard Roberts, Acting Director, BF\nMr. Taylor Quinn, Associate Director for Compliance, BF\nDr. Robert Schaffner, Associate Director for Technology, BF\nMr. Joseph H. Prendergast, Executive Secretariat, OC\nTime: 4:00 - 5:10 p.m.\n.:.\nPlace:\nCommissioner's FB#/8 Conference Room\nSubject: Labeling\nMr. Goodrich opened the meeting stating it was his desire and the desire\nof other visitors to participate in the discussion of possible labeling\nchanges in the interest of FDA law. He cautioned the Commissioner\nnot to get set on a fixed deadline to determine new labeling requirements--\nto take as long as necessary to avoid controversy. Mr. Goodrich's\nopening remarks included the following:\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/kgpj0226\n\nQuestion: What place is mentioned in document",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "commissioner's fb#8 conference room",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
881
|
What is the subject of document?
|
labeling
|
Page 1
Mike -
you wanted
Memorandum of Meeting
.:. .
Date:
May 5, 1978
Between:
Mr. William W. Goodrich, Institute of Shortening and Edible Oils, Inc.
Mr. Robert J. Wager, American Bakers Association
Mr. Thomas B. House, American Frozen Food Institute
Mr. Richard Lyng, American Meat Institute
Mr. George W. Koch, Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc.
. .:.
Mr. Charles J. Carey, National Food Processors Association
and
Dr. Donald Kennedy, Commissioner, FDA
Mr. Sherwin Gardner, Deputy Commissioner, FDA
Mr. Thomas Crumbly, Executive Assistant to the Commissioner, FDA
Ms. Ellen Williams, Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination, FDA
Mr. Thomas L. Hooker, Office of Policy Coordination, FDA
Mr. J. P. Hile, Associate Commissioner for Regulatory Affairs, FDA
Mr. Robert C. Wetherell, Jr., Office of Legislative Services, FDA
Mr. Stuart Pape, Office of General Counsel, FDA
Dra Howard Roberts, Acting Director, BF
Mr. Taylor Quinn, Associate Director for Compliance, BF
Dr. Robert Schaffner, Associate Director for Technology, BF
Mr. Joseph H. Prendergast, Executive Secretariat, OC
Time: 4:00 - 5:10 p.m.
.:.
Place:
Commissioner's FB#/8 Conference Room
Subject: Labeling
Mr. Goodrich opened the meeting stating it was his desire and the desire
of other visitors to participate in the discussion of possible labeling
changes in the interest of FDA law. He cautioned the Commissioner
not to get set on a fixed deadline to determine new labeling requirements--
to take as long as necessary to avoid controversy. Mr. Goodrich's
opening remarks included the following:
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/kgpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 433,
"image": "kgpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "kgpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 422
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nMike -\nyou wanted\nMemorandum of Meeting\n.:. .\nDate:\nMay 5, 1978\nBetween:\nMr. William W. Goodrich, Institute of Shortening and Edible Oils, Inc.\nMr. Robert J. Wager, American Bakers Association\nMr. Thomas B. House, American Frozen Food Institute\nMr. Richard Lyng, American Meat Institute\nMr. George W. Koch, Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc.\n. .:.\nMr. Charles J. Carey, National Food Processors Association\nand\nDr. Donald Kennedy, Commissioner, FDA\nMr. Sherwin Gardner, Deputy Commissioner, FDA\nMr. Thomas Crumbly, Executive Assistant to the Commissioner, FDA\nMs. Ellen Williams, Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination, FDA\nMr. Thomas L. Hooker, Office of Policy Coordination, FDA\nMr. J. P. Hile, Associate Commissioner for Regulatory Affairs, FDA\nMr. Robert C. Wetherell, Jr., Office of Legislative Services, FDA\nMr. Stuart Pape, Office of General Counsel, FDA\nDra Howard Roberts, Acting Director, BF\nMr. Taylor Quinn, Associate Director for Compliance, BF\nDr. Robert Schaffner, Associate Director for Technology, BF\nMr. Joseph H. Prendergast, Executive Secretariat, OC\nTime: 4:00 - 5:10 p.m.\n.:.\nPlace:\nCommissioner's FB#/8 Conference Room\nSubject: Labeling\nMr. Goodrich opened the meeting stating it was his desire and the desire\nof other visitors to participate in the discussion of possible labeling\nchanges in the interest of FDA law. He cautioned the Commissioner\nnot to get set on a fixed deadline to determine new labeling requirements--\nto take as long as necessary to avoid controversy. Mr. Goodrich's\nopening remarks included the following:\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/kgpj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the subject of document?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "labeling",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
885
|
Who seems to be following America's footsteps?
|
Japan
|
Page 2
Vice-Premier Teng Hsiao-Ping
-2-
December 22, 1978
People's Republic of China
In addition, we urge you to send a team of public health specialists to
the United States to discover the great harm that is caused by a diet high
in sugar, salt, and fat. While Japan seems to be following America's
footsteps down the road to bad health, China still has time to map out its
future food policies in a rational way. And we believe that rational planning
will not include a College of Dentistry in the basement of every Coca-cola
bottling plant.
While Coca-cola and its executives may be sweet while they are dickering
for a lucrative contract, we guarantee you that in the long run they will
cause tooth decay, sleeplessness, and headaches. We hope you will reconsider
your decision and inform us of your thoughts on this matter.
Sincerely,
Michael F. Jacobson, Ph.D.
Executive Director
MF J/jfc
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/gfpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 432,
"image": "gfpj0226_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "gfpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 250
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nVice-Premier Teng Hsiao-Ping\n-2-\nDecember 22, 1978\nPeople's Republic of China\nIn addition, we urge you to send a team of public health specialists to\nthe United States to discover the great harm that is caused by a diet high\nin sugar, salt, and fat. While Japan seems to be following America's\nfootsteps down the road to bad health, China still has time to map out its\nfuture food policies in a rational way. And we believe that rational planning\nwill not include a College of Dentistry in the basement of every Coca-cola\nbottling plant.\nWhile Coca-cola and its executives may be sweet while they are dickering\nfor a lucrative contract, we guarantee you that in the long run they will\ncause tooth decay, sleeplessness, and headaches. We hope you will reconsider\nyour decision and inform us of your thoughts on this matter.\nSincerely,\nMichael F. Jacobson, Ph.D.\nExecutive Director\nMF J/jfc\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/gfpj0226\n\nQuestion: Who seems to be following America's footsteps?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Japan",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
898
|
What is the Telephone Number given?
|
301/436-2373
|
Page 3
JUL-03-2008 10:26
FDA/CFSAN/ONPLDS
301 436 2639
P. 01
. .
FDA
CFSAN
FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY & APPLIED NUTRITION
OFFICE OF NUTRITIONAL PRODUCTS, LABELING
& DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS (HFS-200)
5100 Paint Branch Parkway
College Park, MD 20740
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 301/436-2373
FAX NUMBER: 301/436-2636
DATE:
1/ 3 / 08
TO:
rickion
FAX NUMBER: 2020
12 - 3 31- 2054 .
FROM:
COMMENTS:
..
. ..
. .. . . . . .
Received 07-03-2008 11:07 am
From 301 436 2639
Page 001
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rxpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 439,
"image": "rxpj0226_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rxpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 241
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nJUL-03-2008 10:26\nFDA/CFSAN/ONPLDS\n301 436 2639\nP. 01\n. .\nFDA\nCFSAN\nFOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION\nCENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY & APPLIED NUTRITION\nOFFICE OF NUTRITIONAL PRODUCTS, LABELING\n& DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS (HFS-200)\n5100 Paint Branch Parkway\nCollege Park, MD 20740\nTELEPHONE NUMBER: 301/436-2373\nFAX NUMBER: 301/436-2636\nDATE:\n1/ 3 / 08\nTO:\nrickion\nFAX NUMBER: 2020\n12 - 3 31- 2054 .\nFROM:\nCOMMENTS:\n..\n. ..\n. .. . . . . .\nReceived 07-03-2008 11:07 am\nFrom 301 436 2639\nPage 001\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rxpj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the Telephone Number given?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "301/436-2373",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
899
|
What is the full form of CFSAN?
|
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition
|
Page 1
HFCSF
JUL-03-2008 10:26
FDA/CFSAN/ONPLDS
301 436 2659
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration
College Park, MD 20740
. .'
Audrae Erickson
JUL 0 3 2008
President
Com Refiners Association
1701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Suito 950
Washington, DC 20006-5805 :
Dear Ms. Erickson:.
This is in follow up to the meeting of April 16, 2008, between the Corn Refiners Association and the
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN). The meeting was prompted by a Food
Navigator-[JSA.com article on the use of the term "natural" on products containing high fructose com
syrup (HFCS). You asked CFSAN to reconsider its position on whether the use of the term "natural"
can be used to describe products containing HFCS.
At the meeting Mr. Empie of Archer Daniels Midland Company described the manufacturing process
used to make HFCS and following the meeting you sent CFSAN a written description of this production
process. During the meeting, we stated that our longstanding policy on the use of the term "natural" is
that "natural" means that nothing artificial (including artificial flavors) or synthetic (including all color
additives regardless of source) has been included in or has been added to a food that would not normally
be expected to be in the food. Additionally, we stated that we do not restrict the use of the term
"natural" except on products that contain added color, synthetic substances and flavors as provided for
n Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), section 101.22. After reviewing the information
about the HFCS production process that you provided, it is our understanding that the enzyme used to
make HFCS is fixed to a column by the use of the synthetic fixing agent, glutaraldehyde. Any unreacted
glutaraldehyde is removed by washing the column prior to the addition of the high dextrose equivalent
com starch hydrolysate, which undergoes enzymatic reaction to produce HFCS. Because the
glutaraldehyde does not come into contact with the high dextrose equivalent corn starch hydrolysate, it
would not be considered to be included in or added to the HFCS. Therefore, we would not object to the
use of the term "natural" on a product containing the HFCS produced by the manufacturing process
described by Mr. Empie. However, we would object to the use of the term "natural" on a product
containing HFCS that has a synthetic substance such as a synthetic fixing agent included in or added to
it. We would also object to the use of the term "natural" on a product containing HFCS if the acids used
to obtain the starch hydrolysate do not fit within our policy on "natural" as stated above.
: . .
Received . 07-03-2008 :11:07am From-301 436 2639
Paga 002
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rxpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 441,
"image": "rxpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rxpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 715
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nHFCSF\nJUL-03-2008 10:26\nFDA/CFSAN/ONPLDS\n301 436 2659\nDEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES\nPublic Health Service\nFood and Drug Administration\nCollege Park, MD 20740\n. .'\nAudrae Erickson\nJUL 0 3 2008\nPresident\nCom Refiners Association\n1701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.\nSuito 950\nWashington, DC 20006-5805 :\nDear Ms. Erickson:.\nThis is in follow up to the meeting of April 16, 2008, between the Corn Refiners Association and the\nCenter for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN). The meeting was prompted by a Food\nNavigator-[JSA.com article on the use of the term \"natural\" on products containing high fructose com\nsyrup (HFCS). You asked CFSAN to reconsider its position on whether the use of the term \"natural\"\ncan be used to describe products containing HFCS.\nAt the meeting Mr. Empie of Archer Daniels Midland Company described the manufacturing process\nused to make HFCS and following the meeting you sent CFSAN a written description of this production\nprocess. During the meeting, we stated that our longstanding policy on the use of the term \"natural\" is\nthat \"natural\" means that nothing artificial (including artificial flavors) or synthetic (including all color\nadditives regardless of source) has been included in or has been added to a food that would not normally\nbe expected to be in the food. Additionally, we stated that we do not restrict the use of the term\n\"natural\" except on products that contain added color, synthetic substances and flavors as provided for\nn Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), section 101.22. After reviewing the information\nabout the HFCS production process that you provided, it is our understanding that the enzyme used to\nmake HFCS is fixed to a column by the use of the synthetic fixing agent, glutaraldehyde. Any unreacted\nglutaraldehyde is removed by washing the column prior to the addition of the high dextrose equivalent\ncom starch hydrolysate, which undergoes enzymatic reaction to produce HFCS. Because the\nglutaraldehyde does not come into contact with the high dextrose equivalent corn starch hydrolysate, it\nwould not be considered to be included in or added to the HFCS. Therefore, we would not object to the\nuse of the term \"natural\" on a product containing the HFCS produced by the manufacturing process\ndescribed by Mr. Empie. However, we would object to the use of the term \"natural\" on a product\ncontaining HFCS that has a synthetic substance such as a synthetic fixing agent included in or added to\nit. We would also object to the use of the term \"natural\" on a product containing HFCS if the acids used\nto obtain the starch hydrolysate do not fit within our policy on \"natural\" as stated above.\n: . .\nReceived . 07-03-2008 :11:07am From-301 436 2639\nPaga 002\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rxpj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the full form of CFSAN?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
900
|
Which department is mentioned in the letter head?
|
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
|
Page 1
HFCSF
JUL-03-2008 10:26
FDA/CFSAN/ONPLDS
301 436 2659
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration
College Park, MD 20740
. .'
Audrae Erickson
JUL 0 3 2008
President
Com Refiners Association
1701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Suito 950
Washington, DC 20006-5805 :
Dear Ms. Erickson:.
This is in follow up to the meeting of April 16, 2008, between the Corn Refiners Association and the
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN). The meeting was prompted by a Food
Navigator-[JSA.com article on the use of the term "natural" on products containing high fructose com
syrup (HFCS). You asked CFSAN to reconsider its position on whether the use of the term "natural"
can be used to describe products containing HFCS.
At the meeting Mr. Empie of Archer Daniels Midland Company described the manufacturing process
used to make HFCS and following the meeting you sent CFSAN a written description of this production
process. During the meeting, we stated that our longstanding policy on the use of the term "natural" is
that "natural" means that nothing artificial (including artificial flavors) or synthetic (including all color
additives regardless of source) has been included in or has been added to a food that would not normally
be expected to be in the food. Additionally, we stated that we do not restrict the use of the term
"natural" except on products that contain added color, synthetic substances and flavors as provided for
n Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), section 101.22. After reviewing the information
about the HFCS production process that you provided, it is our understanding that the enzyme used to
make HFCS is fixed to a column by the use of the synthetic fixing agent, glutaraldehyde. Any unreacted
glutaraldehyde is removed by washing the column prior to the addition of the high dextrose equivalent
com starch hydrolysate, which undergoes enzymatic reaction to produce HFCS. Because the
glutaraldehyde does not come into contact with the high dextrose equivalent corn starch hydrolysate, it
would not be considered to be included in or added to the HFCS. Therefore, we would not object to the
use of the term "natural" on a product containing the HFCS produced by the manufacturing process
described by Mr. Empie. However, we would object to the use of the term "natural" on a product
containing HFCS that has a synthetic substance such as a synthetic fixing agent included in or added to
it. We would also object to the use of the term "natural" on a product containing HFCS if the acids used
to obtain the starch hydrolysate do not fit within our policy on "natural" as stated above.
: . .
Received . 07-03-2008 :11:07am From-301 436 2639
Paga 002
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rxpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 441,
"image": "rxpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rxpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 715
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nHFCSF\nJUL-03-2008 10:26\nFDA/CFSAN/ONPLDS\n301 436 2659\nDEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES\nPublic Health Service\nFood and Drug Administration\nCollege Park, MD 20740\n. .'\nAudrae Erickson\nJUL 0 3 2008\nPresident\nCom Refiners Association\n1701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.\nSuito 950\nWashington, DC 20006-5805 :\nDear Ms. Erickson:.\nThis is in follow up to the meeting of April 16, 2008, between the Corn Refiners Association and the\nCenter for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN). The meeting was prompted by a Food\nNavigator-[JSA.com article on the use of the term \"natural\" on products containing high fructose com\nsyrup (HFCS). You asked CFSAN to reconsider its position on whether the use of the term \"natural\"\ncan be used to describe products containing HFCS.\nAt the meeting Mr. Empie of Archer Daniels Midland Company described the manufacturing process\nused to make HFCS and following the meeting you sent CFSAN a written description of this production\nprocess. During the meeting, we stated that our longstanding policy on the use of the term \"natural\" is\nthat \"natural\" means that nothing artificial (including artificial flavors) or synthetic (including all color\nadditives regardless of source) has been included in or has been added to a food that would not normally\nbe expected to be in the food. Additionally, we stated that we do not restrict the use of the term\n\"natural\" except on products that contain added color, synthetic substances and flavors as provided for\nn Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), section 101.22. After reviewing the information\nabout the HFCS production process that you provided, it is our understanding that the enzyme used to\nmake HFCS is fixed to a column by the use of the synthetic fixing agent, glutaraldehyde. Any unreacted\nglutaraldehyde is removed by washing the column prior to the addition of the high dextrose equivalent\ncom starch hydrolysate, which undergoes enzymatic reaction to produce HFCS. Because the\nglutaraldehyde does not come into contact with the high dextrose equivalent corn starch hydrolysate, it\nwould not be considered to be included in or added to the HFCS. Therefore, we would not object to the\nuse of the term \"natural\" on a product containing the HFCS produced by the manufacturing process\ndescribed by Mr. Empie. However, we would object to the use of the term \"natural\" on a product\ncontaining HFCS that has a synthetic substance such as a synthetic fixing agent included in or added to\nit. We would also object to the use of the term \"natural\" on a product containing HFCS if the acids used\nto obtain the starch hydrolysate do not fit within our policy on \"natural\" as stated above.\n: . .\nReceived . 07-03-2008 :11:07am From-301 436 2639\nPaga 002\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rxpj0226\n\nQuestion: Which department is mentioned in the letter head?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
901
|
Who is the President of Corn Refiners Association?
|
Audrae Erickson
|
Page 1
HFCSF
JUL-03-2008 10:26
FDA/CFSAN/ONPLDS
301 436 2659
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration
College Park, MD 20740
. .'
Audrae Erickson
JUL 0 3 2008
President
Com Refiners Association
1701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Suito 950
Washington, DC 20006-5805 :
Dear Ms. Erickson:.
This is in follow up to the meeting of April 16, 2008, between the Corn Refiners Association and the
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN). The meeting was prompted by a Food
Navigator-[JSA.com article on the use of the term "natural" on products containing high fructose com
syrup (HFCS). You asked CFSAN to reconsider its position on whether the use of the term "natural"
can be used to describe products containing HFCS.
At the meeting Mr. Empie of Archer Daniels Midland Company described the manufacturing process
used to make HFCS and following the meeting you sent CFSAN a written description of this production
process. During the meeting, we stated that our longstanding policy on the use of the term "natural" is
that "natural" means that nothing artificial (including artificial flavors) or synthetic (including all color
additives regardless of source) has been included in or has been added to a food that would not normally
be expected to be in the food. Additionally, we stated that we do not restrict the use of the term
"natural" except on products that contain added color, synthetic substances and flavors as provided for
n Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), section 101.22. After reviewing the information
about the HFCS production process that you provided, it is our understanding that the enzyme used to
make HFCS is fixed to a column by the use of the synthetic fixing agent, glutaraldehyde. Any unreacted
glutaraldehyde is removed by washing the column prior to the addition of the high dextrose equivalent
com starch hydrolysate, which undergoes enzymatic reaction to produce HFCS. Because the
glutaraldehyde does not come into contact with the high dextrose equivalent corn starch hydrolysate, it
would not be considered to be included in or added to the HFCS. Therefore, we would not object to the
use of the term "natural" on a product containing the HFCS produced by the manufacturing process
described by Mr. Empie. However, we would object to the use of the term "natural" on a product
containing HFCS that has a synthetic substance such as a synthetic fixing agent included in or added to
it. We would also object to the use of the term "natural" on a product containing HFCS if the acids used
to obtain the starch hydrolysate do not fit within our policy on "natural" as stated above.
: . .
Received . 07-03-2008 :11:07am From-301 436 2639
Paga 002
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rxpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 441,
"image": "rxpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rxpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 713
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nHFCSF\nJUL-03-2008 10:26\nFDA/CFSAN/ONPLDS\n301 436 2659\nDEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES\nPublic Health Service\nFood and Drug Administration\nCollege Park, MD 20740\n. .'\nAudrae Erickson\nJUL 0 3 2008\nPresident\nCom Refiners Association\n1701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.\nSuito 950\nWashington, DC 20006-5805 :\nDear Ms. Erickson:.\nThis is in follow up to the meeting of April 16, 2008, between the Corn Refiners Association and the\nCenter for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN). The meeting was prompted by a Food\nNavigator-[JSA.com article on the use of the term \"natural\" on products containing high fructose com\nsyrup (HFCS). You asked CFSAN to reconsider its position on whether the use of the term \"natural\"\ncan be used to describe products containing HFCS.\nAt the meeting Mr. Empie of Archer Daniels Midland Company described the manufacturing process\nused to make HFCS and following the meeting you sent CFSAN a written description of this production\nprocess. During the meeting, we stated that our longstanding policy on the use of the term \"natural\" is\nthat \"natural\" means that nothing artificial (including artificial flavors) or synthetic (including all color\nadditives regardless of source) has been included in or has been added to a food that would not normally\nbe expected to be in the food. Additionally, we stated that we do not restrict the use of the term\n\"natural\" except on products that contain added color, synthetic substances and flavors as provided for\nn Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), section 101.22. After reviewing the information\nabout the HFCS production process that you provided, it is our understanding that the enzyme used to\nmake HFCS is fixed to a column by the use of the synthetic fixing agent, glutaraldehyde. Any unreacted\nglutaraldehyde is removed by washing the column prior to the addition of the high dextrose equivalent\ncom starch hydrolysate, which undergoes enzymatic reaction to produce HFCS. Because the\nglutaraldehyde does not come into contact with the high dextrose equivalent corn starch hydrolysate, it\nwould not be considered to be included in or added to the HFCS. Therefore, we would not object to the\nuse of the term \"natural\" on a product containing the HFCS produced by the manufacturing process\ndescribed by Mr. Empie. However, we would object to the use of the term \"natural\" on a product\ncontaining HFCS that has a synthetic substance such as a synthetic fixing agent included in or added to\nit. We would also object to the use of the term \"natural\" on a product containing HFCS if the acids used\nto obtain the starch hydrolysate do not fit within our policy on \"natural\" as stated above.\n: . .\nReceived . 07-03-2008 :11:07am From-301 436 2639\nPaga 002\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rxpj0226\n\nQuestion: Who is the President of Corn Refiners Association?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Audrae Erickson",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
902
|
When was this letter received?
|
07-03-2008
|
Page 1
HFCSF
JUL-03-2008 10:26
FDA/CFSAN/ONPLDS
301 436 2659
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration
College Park, MD 20740
. .'
Audrae Erickson
JUL 0 3 2008
President
Com Refiners Association
1701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Suito 950
Washington, DC 20006-5805 :
Dear Ms. Erickson:.
This is in follow up to the meeting of April 16, 2008, between the Corn Refiners Association and the
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN). The meeting was prompted by a Food
Navigator-[JSA.com article on the use of the term "natural" on products containing high fructose com
syrup (HFCS). You asked CFSAN to reconsider its position on whether the use of the term "natural"
can be used to describe products containing HFCS.
At the meeting Mr. Empie of Archer Daniels Midland Company described the manufacturing process
used to make HFCS and following the meeting you sent CFSAN a written description of this production
process. During the meeting, we stated that our longstanding policy on the use of the term "natural" is
that "natural" means that nothing artificial (including artificial flavors) or synthetic (including all color
additives regardless of source) has been included in or has been added to a food that would not normally
be expected to be in the food. Additionally, we stated that we do not restrict the use of the term
"natural" except on products that contain added color, synthetic substances and flavors as provided for
n Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), section 101.22. After reviewing the information
about the HFCS production process that you provided, it is our understanding that the enzyme used to
make HFCS is fixed to a column by the use of the synthetic fixing agent, glutaraldehyde. Any unreacted
glutaraldehyde is removed by washing the column prior to the addition of the high dextrose equivalent
com starch hydrolysate, which undergoes enzymatic reaction to produce HFCS. Because the
glutaraldehyde does not come into contact with the high dextrose equivalent corn starch hydrolysate, it
would not be considered to be included in or added to the HFCS. Therefore, we would not object to the
use of the term "natural" on a product containing the HFCS produced by the manufacturing process
described by Mr. Empie. However, we would object to the use of the term "natural" on a product
containing HFCS that has a synthetic substance such as a synthetic fixing agent included in or added to
it. We would also object to the use of the term "natural" on a product containing HFCS if the acids used
to obtain the starch hydrolysate do not fit within our policy on "natural" as stated above.
: . .
Received . 07-03-2008 :11:07am From-301 436 2639
Paga 002
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rxpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 441,
"image": "rxpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rxpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 710
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nHFCSF\nJUL-03-2008 10:26\nFDA/CFSAN/ONPLDS\n301 436 2659\nDEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES\nPublic Health Service\nFood and Drug Administration\nCollege Park, MD 20740\n. .'\nAudrae Erickson\nJUL 0 3 2008\nPresident\nCom Refiners Association\n1701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.\nSuito 950\nWashington, DC 20006-5805 :\nDear Ms. Erickson:.\nThis is in follow up to the meeting of April 16, 2008, between the Corn Refiners Association and the\nCenter for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN). The meeting was prompted by a Food\nNavigator-[JSA.com article on the use of the term \"natural\" on products containing high fructose com\nsyrup (HFCS). You asked CFSAN to reconsider its position on whether the use of the term \"natural\"\ncan be used to describe products containing HFCS.\nAt the meeting Mr. Empie of Archer Daniels Midland Company described the manufacturing process\nused to make HFCS and following the meeting you sent CFSAN a written description of this production\nprocess. During the meeting, we stated that our longstanding policy on the use of the term \"natural\" is\nthat \"natural\" means that nothing artificial (including artificial flavors) or synthetic (including all color\nadditives regardless of source) has been included in or has been added to a food that would not normally\nbe expected to be in the food. Additionally, we stated that we do not restrict the use of the term\n\"natural\" except on products that contain added color, synthetic substances and flavors as provided for\nn Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), section 101.22. After reviewing the information\nabout the HFCS production process that you provided, it is our understanding that the enzyme used to\nmake HFCS is fixed to a column by the use of the synthetic fixing agent, glutaraldehyde. Any unreacted\nglutaraldehyde is removed by washing the column prior to the addition of the high dextrose equivalent\ncom starch hydrolysate, which undergoes enzymatic reaction to produce HFCS. Because the\nglutaraldehyde does not come into contact with the high dextrose equivalent corn starch hydrolysate, it\nwould not be considered to be included in or added to the HFCS. Therefore, we would not object to the\nuse of the term \"natural\" on a product containing the HFCS produced by the manufacturing process\ndescribed by Mr. Empie. However, we would object to the use of the term \"natural\" on a product\ncontaining HFCS that has a synthetic substance such as a synthetic fixing agent included in or added to\nit. We would also object to the use of the term \"natural\" on a product containing HFCS if the acids used\nto obtain the starch hydrolysate do not fit within our policy on \"natural\" as stated above.\n: . .\nReceived . 07-03-2008 :11:07am From-301 436 2639\nPaga 002\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rxpj0226\n\nQuestion: When was this letter received?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "07-03-2008",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
903
|
What is the date mentioned in the letter?
|
July 28, 1972
|
Page 1
Boxs' Life
July 28, 1972
271 MADISON AVE.
NEW YORK N. Y. 10016
212 LE2- 0985
Michael F. Jacobson, Ph. D.
Center for Science in the Public Interest
1346 Connecticut Avenue, N. W.
Room 812
Washington, D. C. 20036
Dear Dr. Jacobson:
Attached is a copy of the information on soft drinks
produced by our Reader Panel studies. This should
contain the information you require.
Cordially,
RLG:j1
Robert L. Goldsmith
Att.
Marketing Director
THE NATIONAL MAGAZINE FOR ALL BOYS PUBLISHED BY THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/Ihpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 426,
"image": "lhpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "lhpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 197
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nBoxs' Life\nJuly 28, 1972\n271 MADISON AVE.\nNEW YORK N. Y. 10016\n212 LE2- 0985\nMichael F. Jacobson, Ph. D.\nCenter for Science in the Public Interest\n1346 Connecticut Avenue, N. W.\nRoom 812\nWashington, D. C. 20036\nDear Dr. Jacobson:\nAttached is a copy of the information on soft drinks\nproduced by our Reader Panel studies. This should\ncontain the information you require.\nCordially,\nRLG:j1\nRobert L. Goldsmith\nAtt.\nMarketing Director\nTHE NATIONAL MAGAZINE FOR ALL BOYS PUBLISHED BY THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/Ihpj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the date mentioned in the letter?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "July 28, 1972",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
904
|
What is the fulll form of FDA?
|
Food & Drug Administration
|
Page 3
JUL-03-2008 10:26
FDA/CFSAN/ONPLDS
301 436 2639
P. 01
. .
FDA
CFSAN
FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY & APPLIED NUTRITION
OFFICE OF NUTRITIONAL PRODUCTS, LABELING
& DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS (HFS-200)
5100 Paint Branch Parkway
College Park, MD 20740
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 301/436-2373
FAX NUMBER: 301/436-2636
DATE:
1/ 3 / 08
TO:
rickion
FAX NUMBER: 2020
12 - 3 31- 2054 .
FROM:
COMMENTS:
..
. ..
. .. . . . . .
Received 07-03-2008 11:07 am
From 301 436 2639
Page 001
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rxpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 439,
"image": "rxpj0226_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rxpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 241
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nJUL-03-2008 10:26\nFDA/CFSAN/ONPLDS\n301 436 2639\nP. 01\n. .\nFDA\nCFSAN\nFOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION\nCENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY & APPLIED NUTRITION\nOFFICE OF NUTRITIONAL PRODUCTS, LABELING\n& DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS (HFS-200)\n5100 Paint Branch Parkway\nCollege Park, MD 20740\nTELEPHONE NUMBER: 301/436-2373\nFAX NUMBER: 301/436-2636\nDATE:\n1/ 3 / 08\nTO:\nrickion\nFAX NUMBER: 2020\n12 - 3 31- 2054 .\nFROM:\nCOMMENTS:\n..\n. ..\n. .. . . . . .\nReceived 07-03-2008 11:07 am\nFrom 301 436 2639\nPage 001\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rxpj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the fulll form of FDA?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Food & Drug Administration",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
905
|
What are the scheduled public gatherings on?
|
food labeling
|
Page 2
Page 2 - Memorandum of Meeting
He is glad to see the scheduled public hearings on food labeling.
That greater ingredient labeling may be a little oversold--that
it may not deliver the expected benefits-that only 20% of
consumers read labels.
That if anything was unsafe in a product it wouldn't be there--
that something needs to be done to come up with a new technique
for additive labeling--that this needs to be thought out.
If a product is ingredient labeled with "Red 40" what will
the consumer get out of it?
Nutrition labeling is too complex--that the Commissioner
should "try" anything we come up with prior to adopting it.
He stated that percent labeling is of the same status.
That he hopes that FDA is with him and his associates on
national uniformity--that they are against preemption--that
a State should not require different labeling-that we should
prepare a means to update State laws.
Open date labeling=-Mr. Goodrich asked what the industry
should be telling the consumers.
Registration--should only be for where plants are--should
not require routine records submission.
There should be a method for people "at risk" to see FDA
Establishment Inspection Reports.
Mr. Goodrich ended his opening remarks with the observation that there
must be some way that a person can challenge FDA when it chooses to
enforce a procedure that someone is not in favor of-that perhaps a
challenge on constitutionality.
The other visitors at the meeting then presented brief discussions
of their opinion about labeling.
Following are some of the general
concerns raised.
That there are unique problems in the baking industry--that
they will have a label that only Ph.D's in chemistry will
understand. The idea of greatly expanded labeling will come
to an end no one expected.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/kgpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 435,
"image": "kgpj0226_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "kgpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 412
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nPage 2 - Memorandum of Meeting\nHe is glad to see the scheduled public hearings on food labeling.\nThat greater ingredient labeling may be a little oversold--that\nit may not deliver the expected benefits-that only 20% of\nconsumers read labels.\nThat if anything was unsafe in a product it wouldn't be there--\nthat something needs to be done to come up with a new technique\nfor additive labeling--that this needs to be thought out.\nIf a product is ingredient labeled with \"Red 40\" what will\nthe consumer get out of it?\nNutrition labeling is too complex--that the Commissioner\nshould \"try\" anything we come up with prior to adopting it.\nHe stated that percent labeling is of the same status.\nThat he hopes that FDA is with him and his associates on\nnational uniformity--that they are against preemption--that\na State should not require different labeling-that we should\nprepare a means to update State laws.\nOpen date labeling=-Mr. Goodrich asked what the industry\nshould be telling the consumers.\nRegistration--should only be for where plants are--should\nnot require routine records submission.\nThere should be a method for people \"at risk\" to see FDA\nEstablishment Inspection Reports.\nMr. Goodrich ended his opening remarks with the observation that there\nmust be some way that a person can challenge FDA when it chooses to\nenforce a procedure that someone is not in favor of-that perhaps a\nchallenge on constitutionality.\nThe other visitors at the meeting then presented brief discussions\nof their opinion about labeling.\nFollowing are some of the general\nconcerns raised.\nThat there are unique problems in the baking industry--that\nthey will have a label that only Ph.D's in chemistry will\nunderstand. The idea of greatly expanded labeling will come\nto an end no one expected.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/kgpj0226\n\nQuestion: What are the scheduled public gatherings on?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "food labeling",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
907
|
How much percent of consumers reads labels?
|
20%
|
Page 2
Page 2 - Memorandum of Meeting
He is glad to see the scheduled public hearings on food labeling.
That greater ingredient labeling may be a little oversold--that
it may not deliver the expected benefits-that only 20% of
consumers read labels.
That if anything was unsafe in a product it wouldn't be there--
that something needs to be done to come up with a new technique
for additive labeling--that this needs to be thought out.
If a product is ingredient labeled with "Red 40" what will
the consumer get out of it?
Nutrition labeling is too complex--that the Commissioner
should "try" anything we come up with prior to adopting it.
He stated that percent labeling is of the same status.
That he hopes that FDA is with him and his associates on
national uniformity--that they are against preemption--that
a State should not require different labeling-that we should
prepare a means to update State laws.
Open date labeling=-Mr. Goodrich asked what the industry
should be telling the consumers.
Registration--should only be for where plants are--should
not require routine records submission.
There should be a method for people "at risk" to see FDA
Establishment Inspection Reports.
Mr. Goodrich ended his opening remarks with the observation that there
must be some way that a person can challenge FDA when it chooses to
enforce a procedure that someone is not in favor of-that perhaps a
challenge on constitutionality.
The other visitors at the meeting then presented brief discussions
of their opinion about labeling.
Following are some of the general
concerns raised.
That there are unique problems in the baking industry--that
they will have a label that only Ph.D's in chemistry will
understand. The idea of greatly expanded labeling will come
to an end no one expected.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/kgpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 435,
"image": "kgpj0226_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "kgpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 412
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nPage 2 - Memorandum of Meeting\nHe is glad to see the scheduled public hearings on food labeling.\nThat greater ingredient labeling may be a little oversold--that\nit may not deliver the expected benefits-that only 20% of\nconsumers read labels.\nThat if anything was unsafe in a product it wouldn't be there--\nthat something needs to be done to come up with a new technique\nfor additive labeling--that this needs to be thought out.\nIf a product is ingredient labeled with \"Red 40\" what will\nthe consumer get out of it?\nNutrition labeling is too complex--that the Commissioner\nshould \"try\" anything we come up with prior to adopting it.\nHe stated that percent labeling is of the same status.\nThat he hopes that FDA is with him and his associates on\nnational uniformity--that they are against preemption--that\na State should not require different labeling-that we should\nprepare a means to update State laws.\nOpen date labeling=-Mr. Goodrich asked what the industry\nshould be telling the consumers.\nRegistration--should only be for where plants are--should\nnot require routine records submission.\nThere should be a method for people \"at risk\" to see FDA\nEstablishment Inspection Reports.\nMr. Goodrich ended his opening remarks with the observation that there\nmust be some way that a person can challenge FDA when it chooses to\nenforce a procedure that someone is not in favor of-that perhaps a\nchallenge on constitutionality.\nThe other visitors at the meeting then presented brief discussions\nof their opinion about labeling.\nFollowing are some of the general\nconcerns raised.\nThat there are unique problems in the baking industry--that\nthey will have a label that only Ph.D's in chemistry will\nunderstand. The idea of greatly expanded labeling will come\nto an end no one expected.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/kgpj0226\n\nQuestion: How much percent of consumers reads labels?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "20%",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
908
|
What is the heading of the document?
|
memorandum of meeting
|
Page 2
Page 2 - Memorandum of Meeting
He is glad to see the scheduled public hearings on food labeling.
That greater ingredient labeling may be a little oversold--that
it may not deliver the expected benefits-that only 20% of
consumers read labels.
That if anything was unsafe in a product it wouldn't be there--
that something needs to be done to come up with a new technique
for additive labeling--that this needs to be thought out.
If a product is ingredient labeled with "Red 40" what will
the consumer get out of it?
Nutrition labeling is too complex--that the Commissioner
should "try" anything we come up with prior to adopting it.
He stated that percent labeling is of the same status.
That he hopes that FDA is with him and his associates on
national uniformity--that they are against preemption--that
a State should not require different labeling-that we should
prepare a means to update State laws.
Open date labeling=-Mr. Goodrich asked what the industry
should be telling the consumers.
Registration--should only be for where plants are--should
not require routine records submission.
There should be a method for people "at risk" to see FDA
Establishment Inspection Reports.
Mr. Goodrich ended his opening remarks with the observation that there
must be some way that a person can challenge FDA when it chooses to
enforce a procedure that someone is not in favor of-that perhaps a
challenge on constitutionality.
The other visitors at the meeting then presented brief discussions
of their opinion about labeling.
Following are some of the general
concerns raised.
That there are unique problems in the baking industry--that
they will have a label that only Ph.D's in chemistry will
understand. The idea of greatly expanded labeling will come
to an end no one expected.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/kgpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 435,
"image": "kgpj0226_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "kgpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 415
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nPage 2 - Memorandum of Meeting\nHe is glad to see the scheduled public hearings on food labeling.\nThat greater ingredient labeling may be a little oversold--that\nit may not deliver the expected benefits-that only 20% of\nconsumers read labels.\nThat if anything was unsafe in a product it wouldn't be there--\nthat something needs to be done to come up with a new technique\nfor additive labeling--that this needs to be thought out.\nIf a product is ingredient labeled with \"Red 40\" what will\nthe consumer get out of it?\nNutrition labeling is too complex--that the Commissioner\nshould \"try\" anything we come up with prior to adopting it.\nHe stated that percent labeling is of the same status.\nThat he hopes that FDA is with him and his associates on\nnational uniformity--that they are against preemption--that\na State should not require different labeling-that we should\nprepare a means to update State laws.\nOpen date labeling=-Mr. Goodrich asked what the industry\nshould be telling the consumers.\nRegistration--should only be for where plants are--should\nnot require routine records submission.\nThere should be a method for people \"at risk\" to see FDA\nEstablishment Inspection Reports.\nMr. Goodrich ended his opening remarks with the observation that there\nmust be some way that a person can challenge FDA when it chooses to\nenforce a procedure that someone is not in favor of-that perhaps a\nchallenge on constitutionality.\nThe other visitors at the meeting then presented brief discussions\nof their opinion about labeling.\nFollowing are some of the general\nconcerns raised.\nThat there are unique problems in the baking industry--that\nthey will have a label that only Ph.D's in chemistry will\nunderstand. The idea of greatly expanded labeling will come\nto an end no one expected.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/kgpj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the heading of the document?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "memorandum of meeting",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
910
|
what is the main ingredient of soft drink?
|
Carbonated Water
|
Page 1
ATRRI 1 9:87
Soft drinks are simple products.
The main ingredient is carbonated
water. Other ingredients are identified
- . .
WHAT'S IN
on the label in decreasing order of
amount.
The data included in this pamphlet
SOFT
are for those who want more detailed
information. Values listed herein
represent typical ranges for various
DRINKS
categories of major, nationally
distributed brands of soft drinks.
More information about any of
these ingredients may be obtained from
the
National Soft Drink Association
1101 16th Street, N.W.
.. .. .
Washington, D.C. 20036
(202) 463-6750
National Soft Drink Association
1101 16th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036
12/86
(202) 463-6732
Soft Drink Ingredient Series
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/pkpj02:26
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 443,
"image": "pkpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "pkpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 226
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nATRRI 1 9:87\nSoft drinks are simple products.\nThe main ingredient is carbonated\nwater. Other ingredients are identified\n- . .\nWHAT'S IN\non the label in decreasing order of\namount.\nThe data included in this pamphlet\nSOFT\nare for those who want more detailed\ninformation. Values listed herein\nrepresent typical ranges for various\nDRINKS\ncategories of major, nationally\ndistributed brands of soft drinks.\nMore information about any of\nthese ingredients may be obtained from\nthe\nNational Soft Drink Association\n1101 16th Street, N.W.\n.. .. .\nWashington, D.C. 20036\n(202) 463-6750\nNational Soft Drink Association\n1101 16th Street, N.W.\nWashington, D.C. 20036\n12/86\n(202) 463-6732\nSoft Drink Ingredient Series\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/pkpj02:26\n\nQuestion: what is the main ingredient of soft drink?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Carbonated Water",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
912
|
What is are the words written in bold in second paragraph?
|
Caffeine and Other Alleged Health Related Effects
|
Page 6
relation to birth defects reinforce the
broader conclusions from the scientific
References
literature. No convincing evidence exists
1. Roberts, H. R. and J. J. Barone,
that normal maternal caffeine consump-
"Biological Effects of Caffeine:
tion is associated with increased risk of
History and Use," Food Technology,
human birth defects.
37 No. 9, pp. 32-39, 1983.
Caffeine and Other Alleged Health
Related Effects At one time or another
in recent years, caffeine has been alleged
2. PepsiCo, Inc., The Physical or
to be connected with peptic ulcers, car-
Technical Effect of Caffeine in Cola
diovascular diseases, cancer, and
Beverages, Purchase, N.Y., July 20,
fibrocystic (benign) breast disease
1981.
However, extensive scientific research has
failed to confirm such allegations. Some
of these concerns were reviewed by the
FASEB expert committee. More recently
3. Institute of Food Technologists'
the Expert Panel on Food Safety and
Expert Panel on Food Safety and
Nutrition convened by the Institute of
Nutrition, "Caffeine," Food
Food Technologists also reviewed perti-
Technology, 37, No. 4, pp. 87-91,
ment scientific studies regarding the
1983.
possible link between caffeine consump-
tion and these health problems. The
Panel concluded that the existing scien-
4. American Council on Science and
tific evidence did not establish that caf-
Health, The Health Effects of Caf-
feine caused any of these ills. In all cases,
feine, New York, N. Y., March
they cited evidence to the contrary, and,
1981.
in some cases unequivocally concluded
that caffeine was not responsible for the
health effect in question. 3
5. Von Borstel, R. W., "Biological
Effects of Caffeine: Metabolism,"
Food Technology, 37, No. 9, pp.
40-43, 1983.
Conclusion
A vast body of evidence exists which
supports the conclusion that normal
6. Neims, A. H., The Comparative
amounts of caffeine, especially the small
Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics
amounts found in some soft drinks, do
of Caffeine in the Regulatory Con-
not present a hazard to humans.
text, University of Florida, July 18,
1981.
More Information
7. Neims, A. H., and R. W. von Borstel,
'Caffeine: Its Metabolism and
For general information on caffeine and
Biochemical Mechanisms of
its use in soft drinks, please contact the
National Soft Drink Association, 1101
Action," in Nutrition and the
Brain, Vol. 6, R. J. Wurtman and
Sixteenth Street, N.W., Washington,
D.C. 20036 (202) 463-6770.
J. J. Wurtman, Eds., Raven Press,
N.Y., 1983
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/pkpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 438,
"image": "pkpj0226_6.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "pkpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "6"
}
| 711
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 6\nrelation to birth defects reinforce the\nbroader conclusions from the scientific\nReferences\nliterature. No convincing evidence exists\n1. Roberts, H. R. and J. J. Barone,\nthat normal maternal caffeine consump-\n\"Biological Effects of Caffeine:\ntion is associated with increased risk of\nHistory and Use,\" Food Technology,\nhuman birth defects.\n37 No. 9, pp. 32-39, 1983.\nCaffeine and Other Alleged Health\nRelated Effects At one time or another\nin recent years, caffeine has been alleged\n2. PepsiCo, Inc., The Physical or\nto be connected with peptic ulcers, car-\nTechnical Effect of Caffeine in Cola\ndiovascular diseases, cancer, and\nBeverages, Purchase, N.Y., July 20,\nfibrocystic (benign) breast disease\n1981.\nHowever, extensive scientific research has\nfailed to confirm such allegations. Some\nof these concerns were reviewed by the\nFASEB expert committee. More recently\n3. Institute of Food Technologists'\nthe Expert Panel on Food Safety and\nExpert Panel on Food Safety and\nNutrition convened by the Institute of\nNutrition, \"Caffeine,\" Food\nFood Technologists also reviewed perti-\nTechnology, 37, No. 4, pp. 87-91,\nment scientific studies regarding the\n1983.\npossible link between caffeine consump-\ntion and these health problems. The\nPanel concluded that the existing scien-\n4. American Council on Science and\ntific evidence did not establish that caf-\nHealth, The Health Effects of Caf-\nfeine caused any of these ills. In all cases,\nfeine, New York, N. Y., March\nthey cited evidence to the contrary, and,\n1981.\nin some cases unequivocally concluded\nthat caffeine was not responsible for the\nhealth effect in question. 3\n5. Von Borstel, R. W., \"Biological\nEffects of Caffeine: Metabolism,\"\nFood Technology, 37, No. 9, pp.\n40-43, 1983.\nConclusion\nA vast body of evidence exists which\nsupports the conclusion that normal\n6. Neims, A. H., The Comparative\namounts of caffeine, especially the small\nMetabolism and Pharmacokinetics\namounts found in some soft drinks, do\nof Caffeine in the Regulatory Con-\nnot present a hazard to humans.\ntext, University of Florida, July 18,\n1981.\nMore Information\n7. Neims, A. H., and R. W. von Borstel,\n'Caffeine: Its Metabolism and\nFor general information on caffeine and\nBiochemical Mechanisms of\nits use in soft drinks, please contact the\nNational Soft Drink Association, 1101\nAction,\" in Nutrition and the\nBrain, Vol. 6, R. J. Wurtman and\nSixteenth Street, N.W., Washington,\nD.C. 20036 (202) 463-6770.\nJ. J. Wurtman, Eds., Raven Press,\nN.Y., 1983\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/pkpj0226\n\nQuestion: What is are the words written in bold in second paragraph?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Caffeine and Other Alleged Health Related Effects",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
914
|
What is the heading in right corner ?
|
What's in Soft Drinks
|
Page 1
ATRRI 1 9:87
Soft drinks are simple products.
The main ingredient is carbonated
water. Other ingredients are identified
- . .
WHAT'S IN
on the label in decreasing order of
amount.
The data included in this pamphlet
SOFT
are for those who want more detailed
information. Values listed herein
represent typical ranges for various
DRINKS
categories of major, nationally
distributed brands of soft drinks.
More information about any of
these ingredients may be obtained from
the
National Soft Drink Association
1101 16th Street, N.W.
.. .. .
Washington, D.C. 20036
(202) 463-6750
National Soft Drink Association
1101 16th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036
12/86
(202) 463-6732
Soft Drink Ingredient Series
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/pkpj02:26
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 443,
"image": "pkpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "pkpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 227
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nATRRI 1 9:87\nSoft drinks are simple products.\nThe main ingredient is carbonated\nwater. Other ingredients are identified\n- . .\nWHAT'S IN\non the label in decreasing order of\namount.\nThe data included in this pamphlet\nSOFT\nare for those who want more detailed\ninformation. Values listed herein\nrepresent typical ranges for various\nDRINKS\ncategories of major, nationally\ndistributed brands of soft drinks.\nMore information about any of\nthese ingredients may be obtained from\nthe\nNational Soft Drink Association\n1101 16th Street, N.W.\n.. .. .\nWashington, D.C. 20036\n(202) 463-6750\nNational Soft Drink Association\n1101 16th Street, N.W.\nWashington, D.C. 20036\n12/86\n(202) 463-6732\nSoft Drink Ingredient Series\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/pkpj02:26\n\nQuestion: What is the heading in right corner ?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "What's in Soft Drinks",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
915
|
What is the second reference mentioned?
|
PepsiCo, Inc., The Physical or Technical Effect of Caffeine in Cola Beverages, Purchase, N.Y., July 20, 1981
|
Page 6
relation to birth defects reinforce the
broader conclusions from the scientific
References
literature. No convincing evidence exists
1. Roberts, H. R. and J. J. Barone,
that normal maternal caffeine consump-
"Biological Effects of Caffeine:
tion is associated with increased risk of
History and Use," Food Technology,
human birth defects.
37 No. 9, pp. 32-39, 1983.
Caffeine and Other Alleged Health
Related Effects At one time or another
in recent years, caffeine has been alleged
2. PepsiCo, Inc., The Physical or
to be connected with peptic ulcers, car-
Technical Effect of Caffeine in Cola
diovascular diseases, cancer, and
Beverages, Purchase, N.Y., July 20,
fibrocystic (benign) breast disease
1981.
However, extensive scientific research has
failed to confirm such allegations. Some
of these concerns were reviewed by the
FASEB expert committee. More recently
3. Institute of Food Technologists'
the Expert Panel on Food Safety and
Expert Panel on Food Safety and
Nutrition convened by the Institute of
Nutrition, "Caffeine," Food
Food Technologists also reviewed perti-
Technology, 37, No. 4, pp. 87-91,
ment scientific studies regarding the
1983.
possible link between caffeine consump-
tion and these health problems. The
Panel concluded that the existing scien-
4. American Council on Science and
tific evidence did not establish that caf-
Health, The Health Effects of Caf-
feine caused any of these ills. In all cases,
feine, New York, N. Y., March
they cited evidence to the contrary, and,
1981.
in some cases unequivocally concluded
that caffeine was not responsible for the
health effect in question. 3
5. Von Borstel, R. W., "Biological
Effects of Caffeine: Metabolism,"
Food Technology, 37, No. 9, pp.
40-43, 1983.
Conclusion
A vast body of evidence exists which
supports the conclusion that normal
6. Neims, A. H., The Comparative
amounts of caffeine, especially the small
Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics
amounts found in some soft drinks, do
of Caffeine in the Regulatory Con-
not present a hazard to humans.
text, University of Florida, July 18,
1981.
More Information
7. Neims, A. H., and R. W. von Borstel,
'Caffeine: Its Metabolism and
For general information on caffeine and
Biochemical Mechanisms of
its use in soft drinks, please contact the
National Soft Drink Association, 1101
Action," in Nutrition and the
Brain, Vol. 6, R. J. Wurtman and
Sixteenth Street, N.W., Washington,
D.C. 20036 (202) 463-6770.
J. J. Wurtman, Eds., Raven Press,
N.Y., 1983
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/pkpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 438,
"image": "pkpj0226_6.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "pkpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "6"
}
| 730
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 6\nrelation to birth defects reinforce the\nbroader conclusions from the scientific\nReferences\nliterature. No convincing evidence exists\n1. Roberts, H. R. and J. J. Barone,\nthat normal maternal caffeine consump-\n\"Biological Effects of Caffeine:\ntion is associated with increased risk of\nHistory and Use,\" Food Technology,\nhuman birth defects.\n37 No. 9, pp. 32-39, 1983.\nCaffeine and Other Alleged Health\nRelated Effects At one time or another\nin recent years, caffeine has been alleged\n2. PepsiCo, Inc., The Physical or\nto be connected with peptic ulcers, car-\nTechnical Effect of Caffeine in Cola\ndiovascular diseases, cancer, and\nBeverages, Purchase, N.Y., July 20,\nfibrocystic (benign) breast disease\n1981.\nHowever, extensive scientific research has\nfailed to confirm such allegations. Some\nof these concerns were reviewed by the\nFASEB expert committee. More recently\n3. Institute of Food Technologists'\nthe Expert Panel on Food Safety and\nExpert Panel on Food Safety and\nNutrition convened by the Institute of\nNutrition, \"Caffeine,\" Food\nFood Technologists also reviewed perti-\nTechnology, 37, No. 4, pp. 87-91,\nment scientific studies regarding the\n1983.\npossible link between caffeine consump-\ntion and these health problems. The\nPanel concluded that the existing scien-\n4. American Council on Science and\ntific evidence did not establish that caf-\nHealth, The Health Effects of Caf-\nfeine caused any of these ills. In all cases,\nfeine, New York, N. Y., March\nthey cited evidence to the contrary, and,\n1981.\nin some cases unequivocally concluded\nthat caffeine was not responsible for the\nhealth effect in question. 3\n5. Von Borstel, R. W., \"Biological\nEffects of Caffeine: Metabolism,\"\nFood Technology, 37, No. 9, pp.\n40-43, 1983.\nConclusion\nA vast body of evidence exists which\nsupports the conclusion that normal\n6. Neims, A. H., The Comparative\namounts of caffeine, especially the small\nMetabolism and Pharmacokinetics\namounts found in some soft drinks, do\nof Caffeine in the Regulatory Con-\nnot present a hazard to humans.\ntext, University of Florida, July 18,\n1981.\nMore Information\n7. Neims, A. H., and R. W. von Borstel,\n'Caffeine: Its Metabolism and\nFor general information on caffeine and\nBiochemical Mechanisms of\nits use in soft drinks, please contact the\nNational Soft Drink Association, 1101\nAction,\" in Nutrition and the\nBrain, Vol. 6, R. J. Wurtman and\nSixteenth Street, N.W., Washington,\nD.C. 20036 (202) 463-6770.\nJ. J. Wurtman, Eds., Raven Press,\nN.Y., 1983\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/pkpj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the second reference mentioned?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "PepsiCo, Inc., The Physical or Technical Effect of Caffeine in Cola Beverages, Purchase, N.Y., July 20, 1981",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
917
|
Which university does the sixth reference mention?
|
University of Florida
|
Page 6
relation to birth defects reinforce the
broader conclusions from the scientific
References
literature. No convincing evidence exists
1. Roberts, H. R. and J. J. Barone,
that normal maternal caffeine consump-
"Biological Effects of Caffeine:
tion is associated with increased risk of
History and Use," Food Technology,
human birth defects.
37 No. 9, pp. 32-39, 1983.
Caffeine and Other Alleged Health
Related Effects At one time or another
in recent years, caffeine has been alleged
2. PepsiCo, Inc., The Physical or
to be connected with peptic ulcers, car-
Technical Effect of Caffeine in Cola
diovascular diseases, cancer, and
Beverages, Purchase, N.Y., July 20,
fibrocystic (benign) breast disease
1981.
However, extensive scientific research has
failed to confirm such allegations. Some
of these concerns were reviewed by the
FASEB expert committee. More recently
3. Institute of Food Technologists'
the Expert Panel on Food Safety and
Expert Panel on Food Safety and
Nutrition convened by the Institute of
Nutrition, "Caffeine," Food
Food Technologists also reviewed perti-
Technology, 37, No. 4, pp. 87-91,
ment scientific studies regarding the
1983.
possible link between caffeine consump-
tion and these health problems. The
Panel concluded that the existing scien-
4. American Council on Science and
tific evidence did not establish that caf-
Health, The Health Effects of Caf-
feine caused any of these ills. In all cases,
feine, New York, N. Y., March
they cited evidence to the contrary, and,
1981.
in some cases unequivocally concluded
that caffeine was not responsible for the
health effect in question. 3
5. Von Borstel, R. W., "Biological
Effects of Caffeine: Metabolism,"
Food Technology, 37, No. 9, pp.
40-43, 1983.
Conclusion
A vast body of evidence exists which
supports the conclusion that normal
6. Neims, A. H., The Comparative
amounts of caffeine, especially the small
Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics
amounts found in some soft drinks, do
of Caffeine in the Regulatory Con-
not present a hazard to humans.
text, University of Florida, July 18,
1981.
More Information
7. Neims, A. H., and R. W. von Borstel,
'Caffeine: Its Metabolism and
For general information on caffeine and
Biochemical Mechanisms of
its use in soft drinks, please contact the
National Soft Drink Association, 1101
Action," in Nutrition and the
Brain, Vol. 6, R. J. Wurtman and
Sixteenth Street, N.W., Washington,
D.C. 20036 (202) 463-6770.
J. J. Wurtman, Eds., Raven Press,
N.Y., 1983
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/pkpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 438,
"image": "pkpj0226_6.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "pkpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "6"
}
| 700
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 6\nrelation to birth defects reinforce the\nbroader conclusions from the scientific\nReferences\nliterature. No convincing evidence exists\n1. Roberts, H. R. and J. J. Barone,\nthat normal maternal caffeine consump-\n\"Biological Effects of Caffeine:\ntion is associated with increased risk of\nHistory and Use,\" Food Technology,\nhuman birth defects.\n37 No. 9, pp. 32-39, 1983.\nCaffeine and Other Alleged Health\nRelated Effects At one time or another\nin recent years, caffeine has been alleged\n2. PepsiCo, Inc., The Physical or\nto be connected with peptic ulcers, car-\nTechnical Effect of Caffeine in Cola\ndiovascular diseases, cancer, and\nBeverages, Purchase, N.Y., July 20,\nfibrocystic (benign) breast disease\n1981.\nHowever, extensive scientific research has\nfailed to confirm such allegations. Some\nof these concerns were reviewed by the\nFASEB expert committee. More recently\n3. Institute of Food Technologists'\nthe Expert Panel on Food Safety and\nExpert Panel on Food Safety and\nNutrition convened by the Institute of\nNutrition, \"Caffeine,\" Food\nFood Technologists also reviewed perti-\nTechnology, 37, No. 4, pp. 87-91,\nment scientific studies regarding the\n1983.\npossible link between caffeine consump-\ntion and these health problems. The\nPanel concluded that the existing scien-\n4. American Council on Science and\ntific evidence did not establish that caf-\nHealth, The Health Effects of Caf-\nfeine caused any of these ills. In all cases,\nfeine, New York, N. Y., March\nthey cited evidence to the contrary, and,\n1981.\nin some cases unequivocally concluded\nthat caffeine was not responsible for the\nhealth effect in question. 3\n5. Von Borstel, R. W., \"Biological\nEffects of Caffeine: Metabolism,\"\nFood Technology, 37, No. 9, pp.\n40-43, 1983.\nConclusion\nA vast body of evidence exists which\nsupports the conclusion that normal\n6. Neims, A. H., The Comparative\namounts of caffeine, especially the small\nMetabolism and Pharmacokinetics\namounts found in some soft drinks, do\nof Caffeine in the Regulatory Con-\nnot present a hazard to humans.\ntext, University of Florida, July 18,\n1981.\nMore Information\n7. Neims, A. H., and R. W. von Borstel,\n'Caffeine: Its Metabolism and\nFor general information on caffeine and\nBiochemical Mechanisms of\nits use in soft drinks, please contact the\nNational Soft Drink Association, 1101\nAction,\" in Nutrition and the\nBrain, Vol. 6, R. J. Wurtman and\nSixteenth Street, N.W., Washington,\nD.C. 20036 (202) 463-6770.\nJ. J. Wurtman, Eds., Raven Press,\nN.Y., 1983\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/pkpj0226\n\nQuestion: Which university does the sixth reference mention?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "University of Florida",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
918
|
Which year is mentioned in the first reference?
|
1983
|
Page 6
relation to birth defects reinforce the
broader conclusions from the scientific
References
literature. No convincing evidence exists
1. Roberts, H. R. and J. J. Barone,
that normal maternal caffeine consump-
"Biological Effects of Caffeine:
tion is associated with increased risk of
History and Use," Food Technology,
human birth defects.
37 No. 9, pp. 32-39, 1983.
Caffeine and Other Alleged Health
Related Effects At one time or another
in recent years, caffeine has been alleged
2. PepsiCo, Inc., The Physical or
to be connected with peptic ulcers, car-
Technical Effect of Caffeine in Cola
diovascular diseases, cancer, and
Beverages, Purchase, N.Y., July 20,
fibrocystic (benign) breast disease
1981.
However, extensive scientific research has
failed to confirm such allegations. Some
of these concerns were reviewed by the
FASEB expert committee. More recently
3. Institute of Food Technologists'
the Expert Panel on Food Safety and
Expert Panel on Food Safety and
Nutrition convened by the Institute of
Nutrition, "Caffeine," Food
Food Technologists also reviewed perti-
Technology, 37, No. 4, pp. 87-91,
ment scientific studies regarding the
1983.
possible link between caffeine consump-
tion and these health problems. The
Panel concluded that the existing scien-
4. American Council on Science and
tific evidence did not establish that caf-
Health, The Health Effects of Caf-
feine caused any of these ills. In all cases,
feine, New York, N. Y., March
they cited evidence to the contrary, and,
1981.
in some cases unequivocally concluded
that caffeine was not responsible for the
health effect in question. 3
5. Von Borstel, R. W., "Biological
Effects of Caffeine: Metabolism,"
Food Technology, 37, No. 9, pp.
40-43, 1983.
Conclusion
A vast body of evidence exists which
supports the conclusion that normal
6. Neims, A. H., The Comparative
amounts of caffeine, especially the small
Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics
amounts found in some soft drinks, do
of Caffeine in the Regulatory Con-
not present a hazard to humans.
text, University of Florida, July 18,
1981.
More Information
7. Neims, A. H., and R. W. von Borstel,
'Caffeine: Its Metabolism and
For general information on caffeine and
Biochemical Mechanisms of
its use in soft drinks, please contact the
National Soft Drink Association, 1101
Action," in Nutrition and the
Brain, Vol. 6, R. J. Wurtman and
Sixteenth Street, N.W., Washington,
D.C. 20036 (202) 463-6770.
J. J. Wurtman, Eds., Raven Press,
N.Y., 1983
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/pkpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 438,
"image": "pkpj0226_6.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "pkpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "6"
}
| 700
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 6\nrelation to birth defects reinforce the\nbroader conclusions from the scientific\nReferences\nliterature. No convincing evidence exists\n1. Roberts, H. R. and J. J. Barone,\nthat normal maternal caffeine consump-\n\"Biological Effects of Caffeine:\ntion is associated with increased risk of\nHistory and Use,\" Food Technology,\nhuman birth defects.\n37 No. 9, pp. 32-39, 1983.\nCaffeine and Other Alleged Health\nRelated Effects At one time or another\nin recent years, caffeine has been alleged\n2. PepsiCo, Inc., The Physical or\nto be connected with peptic ulcers, car-\nTechnical Effect of Caffeine in Cola\ndiovascular diseases, cancer, and\nBeverages, Purchase, N.Y., July 20,\nfibrocystic (benign) breast disease\n1981.\nHowever, extensive scientific research has\nfailed to confirm such allegations. Some\nof these concerns were reviewed by the\nFASEB expert committee. More recently\n3. Institute of Food Technologists'\nthe Expert Panel on Food Safety and\nExpert Panel on Food Safety and\nNutrition convened by the Institute of\nNutrition, \"Caffeine,\" Food\nFood Technologists also reviewed perti-\nTechnology, 37, No. 4, pp. 87-91,\nment scientific studies regarding the\n1983.\npossible link between caffeine consump-\ntion and these health problems. The\nPanel concluded that the existing scien-\n4. American Council on Science and\ntific evidence did not establish that caf-\nHealth, The Health Effects of Caf-\nfeine caused any of these ills. In all cases,\nfeine, New York, N. Y., March\nthey cited evidence to the contrary, and,\n1981.\nin some cases unequivocally concluded\nthat caffeine was not responsible for the\nhealth effect in question. 3\n5. Von Borstel, R. W., \"Biological\nEffects of Caffeine: Metabolism,\"\nFood Technology, 37, No. 9, pp.\n40-43, 1983.\nConclusion\nA vast body of evidence exists which\nsupports the conclusion that normal\n6. Neims, A. H., The Comparative\namounts of caffeine, especially the small\nMetabolism and Pharmacokinetics\namounts found in some soft drinks, do\nof Caffeine in the Regulatory Con-\nnot present a hazard to humans.\ntext, University of Florida, July 18,\n1981.\nMore Information\n7. Neims, A. H., and R. W. von Borstel,\n'Caffeine: Its Metabolism and\nFor general information on caffeine and\nBiochemical Mechanisms of\nits use in soft drinks, please contact the\nNational Soft Drink Association, 1101\nAction,\" in Nutrition and the\nBrain, Vol. 6, R. J. Wurtman and\nSixteenth Street, N.W., Washington,\nD.C. 20036 (202) 463-6770.\nJ. J. Wurtman, Eds., Raven Press,\nN.Y., 1983\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/pkpj0226\n\nQuestion: Which year is mentioned in the first reference?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1983",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
920
|
who is marketing director?
|
Robert l. goldsmith
|
Page 1
Boxs' Life
July 28, 1972
271 MADISON AVE.
NEW YORK N. Y. 10016
212 LE2- 0985
Michael F. Jacobson, Ph. D.
Center for Science in the Public Interest
1346 Connecticut Avenue, N. W.
Room 812
Washington, D. C. 20036
Dear Dr. Jacobson:
Attached is a copy of the information on soft drinks
produced by our Reader Panel studies. This should
contain the information you require.
Cordially,
RLG:j1
Robert L. Goldsmith
Att.
Marketing Director
THE NATIONAL MAGAZINE FOR ALL BOYS PUBLISHED BY THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/Ihpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 426,
"image": "lhpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "lhpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 191
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nBoxs' Life\nJuly 28, 1972\n271 MADISON AVE.\nNEW YORK N. Y. 10016\n212 LE2- 0985\nMichael F. Jacobson, Ph. D.\nCenter for Science in the Public Interest\n1346 Connecticut Avenue, N. W.\nRoom 812\nWashington, D. C. 20036\nDear Dr. Jacobson:\nAttached is a copy of the information on soft drinks\nproduced by our Reader Panel studies. This should\ncontain the information you require.\nCordially,\nRLG:j1\nRobert L. Goldsmith\nAtt.\nMarketing Director\nTHE NATIONAL MAGAZINE FOR ALL BOYS PUBLISHED BY THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/Ihpj0226\n\nQuestion: who is marketing director?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Robert l. goldsmith",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
921
|
What is the docket No?
|
78N-0158
|
Page 1
Docket No. 78N-0158
Food and Drug Administration
Hearings on Food Labeling
Washington, D. C.
September 27, 1978
Testimony of Agnes Molnar
Nutritionist, Food Law Project
Community Action for Legal Services
335 Broadway, NY 10013
. ..
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 446,
"image": "xgpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "xgpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 90
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nDocket No. 78N-0158\nFood and Drug Administration\nHearings on Food Labeling\nWashington, D. C.\nSeptember 27, 1978\nTestimony of Agnes Molnar\nNutritionist, Food Law Project\nCommunity Action for Legal Services\n335 Broadway, NY 10013\n. ..\n\nQuestion: What is the docket No?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "78N-0158",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
922
|
who published the national magazine for all boys ?
|
the boy scouts of america
|
Page 1
Boxs' Life
July 28, 1972
271 MADISON AVE.
NEW YORK N. Y. 10016
212 LE2- 0985
Michael F. Jacobson, Ph. D.
Center for Science in the Public Interest
1346 Connecticut Avenue, N. W.
Room 812
Washington, D. C. 20036
Dear Dr. Jacobson:
Attached is a copy of the information on soft drinks
produced by our Reader Panel studies. This should
contain the information you require.
Cordially,
RLG:j1
Robert L. Goldsmith
Att.
Marketing Director
THE NATIONAL MAGAZINE FOR ALL BOYS PUBLISHED BY THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/Ihpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 426,
"image": "lhpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "lhpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 195
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nBoxs' Life\nJuly 28, 1972\n271 MADISON AVE.\nNEW YORK N. Y. 10016\n212 LE2- 0985\nMichael F. Jacobson, Ph. D.\nCenter for Science in the Public Interest\n1346 Connecticut Avenue, N. W.\nRoom 812\nWashington, D. C. 20036\nDear Dr. Jacobson:\nAttached is a copy of the information on soft drinks\nproduced by our Reader Panel studies. This should\ncontain the information you require.\nCordially,\nRLG:j1\nRobert L. Goldsmith\nAtt.\nMarketing Director\nTHE NATIONAL MAGAZINE FOR ALL BOYS PUBLISHED BY THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/Ihpj0226\n\nQuestion: who published the national magazine for all boys ?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "the boy scouts of america",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
924
|
What is the date mentioned on the document?
|
January 29, 2016
|
Page 1
Coca - Cola F
January 29, 2016
MFJ meeting with Sandy Douglas, Coca-cola Co.
Arti Arora, Senior Director Regulatory & Policy.
Caren Pasquale Seckler, VP social commitment
Jim O'Hara, CSPI
He said that Coke has a five-point overall strategy:
Shaping choice
Innovation
Clear facts (labeling?)
Market responsibly (no logos on toys, etc.)
Leading engagement (ABA's commitment to cut calories by 20%)
His main point was to explain Coke's One Brand marketing strategy, which means including
all brands in each ad. This includes significant packaging redesign, e.g., changing Diet Coke
from silver with red trim to Coke red with silver trim. Indicated that this was going to
happen for Coke Zero as well which is now black with red trim. Says it's a big deal. We shall
see.
His main point also was that Coke aims to reduce added sugars. It is making a big push to
increase sales of 7.5- to 8.5-oz cans and bottles. He says they are higher priced now
because relatively few bottlers have the ability to produce them, so shipping and other
distribution costs are high. Coke wants to reduce the price differential. This faces
significant hurdle with retailers who have relied on cheap soda as "loss leader".
He hoped that the industry and health advocates could cooperate to push the moderation
theme. And by industry, he meant the entire food and beverage industry, including
supermarkets and restaurants. (I should talk with Larry Soler and others about that.)
Moderation, he said, also represents a significant change in a 40-year-old business model
where one and all were rewarded by increasing unit volume. Focus now is on generating
revenue rather than volume. He said that in a recent period of time only one in four
Americans had had a Coke. If that number can be hiked to one in two Americans, then
theoretically that can bring down the per capita consumption but still drive revenue
increase.
20% reduction in the UK from 2015 to 2020 (here is it 20% by 2025): He said that Britons
believe EFSA's reassurances that aspartame is safe, whereas Americans don't believe U.S.
government assurances. Apparently, Britons have been switching from full-calorie to diet
soft drinks.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/gxpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 442,
"image": "gxpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "gxpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 548
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nCoca - Cola F\nJanuary 29, 2016\nMFJ meeting with Sandy Douglas, Coca-cola Co.\nArti Arora, Senior Director Regulatory & Policy.\nCaren Pasquale Seckler, VP social commitment\nJim O'Hara, CSPI\nHe said that Coke has a five-point overall strategy:\nShaping choice\nInnovation\nClear facts (labeling?)\nMarket responsibly (no logos on toys, etc.)\nLeading engagement (ABA's commitment to cut calories by 20%)\nHis main point was to explain Coke's One Brand marketing strategy, which means including\nall brands in each ad. This includes significant packaging redesign, e.g., changing Diet Coke\nfrom silver with red trim to Coke red with silver trim. Indicated that this was going to\nhappen for Coke Zero as well which is now black with red trim. Says it's a big deal. We shall\nsee.\nHis main point also was that Coke aims to reduce added sugars. It is making a big push to\nincrease sales of 7.5- to 8.5-oz cans and bottles. He says they are higher priced now\nbecause relatively few bottlers have the ability to produce them, so shipping and other\ndistribution costs are high. Coke wants to reduce the price differential. This faces\nsignificant hurdle with retailers who have relied on cheap soda as \"loss leader\".\nHe hoped that the industry and health advocates could cooperate to push the moderation\ntheme. And by industry, he meant the entire food and beverage industry, including\nsupermarkets and restaurants. (I should talk with Larry Soler and others about that.)\nModeration, he said, also represents a significant change in a 40-year-old business model\nwhere one and all were rewarded by increasing unit volume. Focus now is on generating\nrevenue rather than volume. He said that in a recent period of time only one in four\nAmericans had had a Coke. If that number can be hiked to one in two Americans, then\ntheoretically that can bring down the per capita consumption but still drive revenue\nincrease.\n20% reduction in the UK from 2015 to 2020 (here is it 20% by 2025): He said that Britons\nbelieve EFSA's reassurances that aspartame is safe, whereas Americans don't believe U.S.\ngovernment assurances. Apparently, Britons have been switching from full-calorie to diet\nsoft drinks.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/gxpj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the date mentioned on the document?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "January 29, 2016",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
925
|
What is the date in document?
|
September 27, 1978
|
Page 1
Docket No. 78N-0158
Food and Drug Administration
Hearings on Food Labeling
Washington, D. C.
September 27, 1978
Testimony of Agnes Molnar
Nutritionist, Food Law Project
Community Action for Legal Services
335 Broadway, NY 10013
. ..
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 446,
"image": "xgpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "xgpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 92
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nDocket No. 78N-0158\nFood and Drug Administration\nHearings on Food Labeling\nWashington, D. C.\nSeptember 27, 1978\nTestimony of Agnes Molnar\nNutritionist, Food Law Project\nCommunity Action for Legal Services\n335 Broadway, NY 10013\n. ..\n\nQuestion: What is the date in document?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "September 27, 1978",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
926
|
With whom is the meeting being conducted?
|
Sandy Douglas
|
Page 1
Coca - Cola F
January 29, 2016
MFJ meeting with Sandy Douglas, Coca-cola Co.
Arti Arora, Senior Director Regulatory & Policy.
Caren Pasquale Seckler, VP social commitment
Jim O'Hara, CSPI
He said that Coke has a five-point overall strategy:
Shaping choice
Innovation
Clear facts (labeling?)
Market responsibly (no logos on toys, etc.)
Leading engagement (ABA's commitment to cut calories by 20%)
His main point was to explain Coke's One Brand marketing strategy, which means including
all brands in each ad. This includes significant packaging redesign, e.g., changing Diet Coke
from silver with red trim to Coke red with silver trim. Indicated that this was going to
happen for Coke Zero as well which is now black with red trim. Says it's a big deal. We shall
see.
His main point also was that Coke aims to reduce added sugars. It is making a big push to
increase sales of 7.5- to 8.5-oz cans and bottles. He says they are higher priced now
because relatively few bottlers have the ability to produce them, so shipping and other
distribution costs are high. Coke wants to reduce the price differential. This faces
significant hurdle with retailers who have relied on cheap soda as "loss leader".
He hoped that the industry and health advocates could cooperate to push the moderation
theme. And by industry, he meant the entire food and beverage industry, including
supermarkets and restaurants. (I should talk with Larry Soler and others about that.)
Moderation, he said, also represents a significant change in a 40-year-old business model
where one and all were rewarded by increasing unit volume. Focus now is on generating
revenue rather than volume. He said that in a recent period of time only one in four
Americans had had a Coke. If that number can be hiked to one in two Americans, then
theoretically that can bring down the per capita consumption but still drive revenue
increase.
20% reduction in the UK from 2015 to 2020 (here is it 20% by 2025): He said that Britons
believe EFSA's reassurances that aspartame is safe, whereas Americans don't believe U.S.
government assurances. Apparently, Britons have been switching from full-calorie to diet
soft drinks.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/gxpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 442,
"image": "gxpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "gxpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 543
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nCoca - Cola F\nJanuary 29, 2016\nMFJ meeting with Sandy Douglas, Coca-cola Co.\nArti Arora, Senior Director Regulatory & Policy.\nCaren Pasquale Seckler, VP social commitment\nJim O'Hara, CSPI\nHe said that Coke has a five-point overall strategy:\nShaping choice\nInnovation\nClear facts (labeling?)\nMarket responsibly (no logos on toys, etc.)\nLeading engagement (ABA's commitment to cut calories by 20%)\nHis main point was to explain Coke's One Brand marketing strategy, which means including\nall brands in each ad. This includes significant packaging redesign, e.g., changing Diet Coke\nfrom silver with red trim to Coke red with silver trim. Indicated that this was going to\nhappen for Coke Zero as well which is now black with red trim. Says it's a big deal. We shall\nsee.\nHis main point also was that Coke aims to reduce added sugars. It is making a big push to\nincrease sales of 7.5- to 8.5-oz cans and bottles. He says they are higher priced now\nbecause relatively few bottlers have the ability to produce them, so shipping and other\ndistribution costs are high. Coke wants to reduce the price differential. This faces\nsignificant hurdle with retailers who have relied on cheap soda as \"loss leader\".\nHe hoped that the industry and health advocates could cooperate to push the moderation\ntheme. And by industry, he meant the entire food and beverage industry, including\nsupermarkets and restaurants. (I should talk with Larry Soler and others about that.)\nModeration, he said, also represents a significant change in a 40-year-old business model\nwhere one and all were rewarded by increasing unit volume. Focus now is on generating\nrevenue rather than volume. He said that in a recent period of time only one in four\nAmericans had had a Coke. If that number can be hiked to one in two Americans, then\ntheoretically that can bring down the per capita consumption but still drive revenue\nincrease.\n20% reduction in the UK from 2015 to 2020 (here is it 20% by 2025): He said that Britons\nbelieve EFSA's reassurances that aspartame is safe, whereas Americans don't believe U.S.\ngovernment assurances. Apparently, Britons have been switching from full-calorie to diet\nsoft drinks.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/gxpj0226\n\nQuestion: With whom is the meeting being conducted?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Sandy Douglas",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
927
|
what is the title of the page?
|
historical background
|
Page 3
Historical Background
Caffeine is a widely-distributed,
naturally-occurring substance found in
more than 60 plant species throughout
the world. Coffee beans, tea leaves, kola
nuts, and cocoa beans are among the
more common sources of caffeine con-
sumed by humans. People the world over
have enjoyed beverages made from these
natural sources for thousands of years.
Caffeine consumption dates back to
prehistoric times. The first written men-
tion of a caffeine-containing beverage,
tea, is traditionally attributed to the
legendary Chinese Emperor Shen Nung
in 2737 B.C. Historians generally agree
that coffee's consumption as a hot
beverage dates from about 1000 A.D.
and the coffee plant may have been
cultivated in Ethiopia as early as 575
A.D. In 1519, the Spanish Conquerors
were treated to a sweetened chocolate
drink by the Aztec Emperor Montezuma.
Small amounts of caffeine have been used
as a flavor component in cola and pepper
soft drinks since they originated in the
mid-1880's.1
Caffeine in Soft Drinks
Grocery shelves today offer a wide vari-
ety of soft drinks, each one formulated to
meet particular consumer taste
preferences. Some soft drinks contain
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/pkpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 444,
"image": "pkpj0226_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "pkpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 312
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nHistorical Background\nCaffeine is a widely-distributed,\nnaturally-occurring substance found in\nmore than 60 plant species throughout\nthe world. Coffee beans, tea leaves, kola\nnuts, and cocoa beans are among the\nmore common sources of caffeine con-\nsumed by humans. People the world over\nhave enjoyed beverages made from these\nnatural sources for thousands of years.\nCaffeine consumption dates back to\nprehistoric times. The first written men-\ntion of a caffeine-containing beverage,\ntea, is traditionally attributed to the\nlegendary Chinese Emperor Shen Nung\nin 2737 B.C. Historians generally agree\nthat coffee's consumption as a hot\nbeverage dates from about 1000 A.D.\nand the coffee plant may have been\ncultivated in Ethiopia as early as 575\nA.D. In 1519, the Spanish Conquerors\nwere treated to a sweetened chocolate\ndrink by the Aztec Emperor Montezuma.\nSmall amounts of caffeine have been used\nas a flavor component in cola and pepper\nsoft drinks since they originated in the\nmid-1880's.1\nCaffeine in Soft Drinks\nGrocery shelves today offer a wide vari-\nety of soft drinks, each one formulated to\nmeet particular consumer taste\npreferences. Some soft drinks contain\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/pkpj0226\n\nQuestion: what is the title of the page?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "historical background",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
929
|
What is the date mentioned in the header of the document?
|
January 29, 2016
|
Page 1
Coca - Cola F
January 29, 2016
MFJ meeting with Sandy Douglas, Coca-cola Co.
Arti Arora, Senior Director Regulatory & Policy.
Caren Pasquale Seckler, VP social commitment
Jim O'Hara, CSPI
He said that Coke has a five-point overall strategy:
Shaping choice
Innovation
Clear facts (labeling?)
Market responsibly (no logos on toys, etc.)
Leading engagement (ABA's commitment to cut calories by 20%)
His main point was to explain Coke's One Brand marketing strategy, which means including
all brands in each ad. This includes significant packaging redesign, e.g., changing Diet Coke
from silver with red trim to Coke red with silver trim. Indicated that this was going to
happen for Coke Zero as well which is now black with red trim. Says it's a big deal. We shall
see.
His main point also was that Coke aims to reduce added sugars. It is making a big push to
increase sales of 7.5- to 8.5-oz cans and bottles. He says they are higher priced now
because relatively few bottlers have the ability to produce them, so shipping and other
distribution costs are high. Coke wants to reduce the price differential. This faces
significant hurdle with retailers who have relied on cheap soda as "loss leader".
He hoped that the industry and health advocates could cooperate to push the moderation
theme. And by industry, he meant the entire food and beverage industry, including
supermarkets and restaurants. (I should talk with Larry Soler and others about that.)
Moderation, he said, also represents a significant change in a 40-year-old business model
where one and all were rewarded by increasing unit volume. Focus now is on generating
revenue rather than volume. He said that in a recent period of time only one in four
Americans had had a Coke. If that number can be hiked to one in two Americans, then
theoretically that can bring down the per capita consumption but still drive revenue
increase.
20% reduction in the UK from 2015 to 2020 (here is it 20% by 2025): He said that Britons
believe EFSA's reassurances that aspartame is safe, whereas Americans don't believe U.S.
government assurances. Apparently, Britons have been switching from full-calorie to diet
soft drinks.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/gxpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 442,
"image": "gxpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "gxpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 551
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nCoca - Cola F\nJanuary 29, 2016\nMFJ meeting with Sandy Douglas, Coca-cola Co.\nArti Arora, Senior Director Regulatory & Policy.\nCaren Pasquale Seckler, VP social commitment\nJim O'Hara, CSPI\nHe said that Coke has a five-point overall strategy:\nShaping choice\nInnovation\nClear facts (labeling?)\nMarket responsibly (no logos on toys, etc.)\nLeading engagement (ABA's commitment to cut calories by 20%)\nHis main point was to explain Coke's One Brand marketing strategy, which means including\nall brands in each ad. This includes significant packaging redesign, e.g., changing Diet Coke\nfrom silver with red trim to Coke red with silver trim. Indicated that this was going to\nhappen for Coke Zero as well which is now black with red trim. Says it's a big deal. We shall\nsee.\nHis main point also was that Coke aims to reduce added sugars. It is making a big push to\nincrease sales of 7.5- to 8.5-oz cans and bottles. He says they are higher priced now\nbecause relatively few bottlers have the ability to produce them, so shipping and other\ndistribution costs are high. Coke wants to reduce the price differential. This faces\nsignificant hurdle with retailers who have relied on cheap soda as \"loss leader\".\nHe hoped that the industry and health advocates could cooperate to push the moderation\ntheme. And by industry, he meant the entire food and beverage industry, including\nsupermarkets and restaurants. (I should talk with Larry Soler and others about that.)\nModeration, he said, also represents a significant change in a 40-year-old business model\nwhere one and all were rewarded by increasing unit volume. Focus now is on generating\nrevenue rather than volume. He said that in a recent period of time only one in four\nAmericans had had a Coke. If that number can be hiked to one in two Americans, then\ntheoretically that can bring down the per capita consumption but still drive revenue\nincrease.\n20% reduction in the UK from 2015 to 2020 (here is it 20% by 2025): He said that Britons\nbelieve EFSA's reassurances that aspartame is safe, whereas Americans don't believe U.S.\ngovernment assurances. Apparently, Britons have been switching from full-calorie to diet\nsoft drinks.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/gxpj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the date mentioned in the header of the document?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "January 29, 2016",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
930
|
what are the common sources of caffeine consumed by humans?
|
coffee beans, tea leaves, kola nuts and cocoa beans
|
Page 3
Historical Background
Caffeine is a widely-distributed,
naturally-occurring substance found in
more than 60 plant species throughout
the world. Coffee beans, tea leaves, kola
nuts, and cocoa beans are among the
more common sources of caffeine con-
sumed by humans. People the world over
have enjoyed beverages made from these
natural sources for thousands of years.
Caffeine consumption dates back to
prehistoric times. The first written men-
tion of a caffeine-containing beverage,
tea, is traditionally attributed to the
legendary Chinese Emperor Shen Nung
in 2737 B.C. Historians generally agree
that coffee's consumption as a hot
beverage dates from about 1000 A.D.
and the coffee plant may have been
cultivated in Ethiopia as early as 575
A.D. In 1519, the Spanish Conquerors
were treated to a sweetened chocolate
drink by the Aztec Emperor Montezuma.
Small amounts of caffeine have been used
as a flavor component in cola and pepper
soft drinks since they originated in the
mid-1880's.1
Caffeine in Soft Drinks
Grocery shelves today offer a wide vari-
ety of soft drinks, each one formulated to
meet particular consumer taste
preferences. Some soft drinks contain
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/pkpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 444,
"image": "pkpj0226_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "pkpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 324
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nHistorical Background\nCaffeine is a widely-distributed,\nnaturally-occurring substance found in\nmore than 60 plant species throughout\nthe world. Coffee beans, tea leaves, kola\nnuts, and cocoa beans are among the\nmore common sources of caffeine con-\nsumed by humans. People the world over\nhave enjoyed beverages made from these\nnatural sources for thousands of years.\nCaffeine consumption dates back to\nprehistoric times. The first written men-\ntion of a caffeine-containing beverage,\ntea, is traditionally attributed to the\nlegendary Chinese Emperor Shen Nung\nin 2737 B.C. Historians generally agree\nthat coffee's consumption as a hot\nbeverage dates from about 1000 A.D.\nand the coffee plant may have been\ncultivated in Ethiopia as early as 575\nA.D. In 1519, the Spanish Conquerors\nwere treated to a sweetened chocolate\ndrink by the Aztec Emperor Montezuma.\nSmall amounts of caffeine have been used\nas a flavor component in cola and pepper\nsoft drinks since they originated in the\nmid-1880's.1\nCaffeine in Soft Drinks\nGrocery shelves today offer a wide vari-\nety of soft drinks, each one formulated to\nmeet particular consumer taste\npreferences. Some soft drinks contain\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/pkpj0226\n\nQuestion: what are the common sources of caffeine consumed by humans?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "coffee beans, tea leaves, kola nuts and cocoa beans",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
933
|
What is the name of the person mentioned to Contact?
|
Carlton Curtis
|
Page 1
The Coca Cola Company
Media Relations Department
news
P.O. Drawer 1734, Allanta, Ga. 30301
Telephone (404) 676-2121
release
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact :
Carlton Curtis
404/676-2678
COCA-COLA BEGINS 100TH YEAR
WITH A NEW TASTE;
FIRST CHANGE EVER IN SECRET FORMULA
NEW YORK, April 23, 1985 -- Coca-cola, the world's number
one consumer product, will begin its 100th year with a new
taste, representing the first change in the secret formula since
Coca-cola was created in 1886.
"The best has been made even better," said Roberto C.
Goizueta, chairman of the Board and chief executive officer of
The Coca-cola Company.
"We have changed the taste of the most
universally enjoyed consumer product around the world.
"Consumers in blind taste tests all across the continent
have told us they prefer the new taste of Coca-cola to the
original by an overwhelming majority, " Mr. Goizueta said, "and
there is an even wider margin when consumers are told, 'This is
a new Coca-cola. '"
Mr. Goizueta added,
" Some may choose to call this the
boldest single marketing move in the history of the packaged
goods business.
We simply call it the surest move ever made,
because the new taste of Coke was shaped by the taste of the
consumer .
Source: https://www.industrydocu?tents
cuntents.ucsf.edu/docs/lzyj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 447,
"image": "lzyj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "lzyj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 367
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nThe Coca Cola Company\nMedia Relations Department\nnews\nP.O. Drawer 1734, Allanta, Ga. 30301\nTelephone (404) 676-2121\nrelease\nFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE\nContact :\nCarlton Curtis\n404/676-2678\nCOCA-COLA BEGINS 100TH YEAR\nWITH A NEW TASTE;\nFIRST CHANGE EVER IN SECRET FORMULA\nNEW YORK, April 23, 1985 -- Coca-cola, the world's number\none consumer product, will begin its 100th year with a new\ntaste, representing the first change in the secret formula since\nCoca-cola was created in 1886.\n\"The best has been made even better,\" said Roberto C.\nGoizueta, chairman of the Board and chief executive officer of\nThe Coca-cola Company.\n\"We have changed the taste of the most\nuniversally enjoyed consumer product around the world.\n\"Consumers in blind taste tests all across the continent\nhave told us they prefer the new taste of Coca-cola to the\noriginal by an overwhelming majority, \" Mr. Goizueta said, \"and\nthere is an even wider margin when consumers are told, 'This is\na new Coca-cola. '\"\nMr. Goizueta added,\n\" Some may choose to call this the\nboldest single marketing move in the history of the packaged\ngoods business.\nWe simply call it the surest move ever made,\nbecause the new taste of Coke was shaped by the taste of the\nconsumer .\nSource: https://www.industrydocu?tents\ncuntents.ucsf.edu/docs/lzyj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the name of the person mentioned to Contact?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Carlton Curtis",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
934
|
Which year is COCA-COLA beginning with a new taste?
|
100th year
|
Page 1
The Coca Cola Company
Media Relations Department
news
P.O. Drawer 1734, Allanta, Ga. 30301
Telephone (404) 676-2121
release
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact :
Carlton Curtis
404/676-2678
COCA-COLA BEGINS 100TH YEAR
WITH A NEW TASTE;
FIRST CHANGE EVER IN SECRET FORMULA
NEW YORK, April 23, 1985 -- Coca-cola, the world's number
one consumer product, will begin its 100th year with a new
taste, representing the first change in the secret formula since
Coca-cola was created in 1886.
"The best has been made even better," said Roberto C.
Goizueta, chairman of the Board and chief executive officer of
The Coca-cola Company.
"We have changed the taste of the most
universally enjoyed consumer product around the world.
"Consumers in blind taste tests all across the continent
have told us they prefer the new taste of Coca-cola to the
original by an overwhelming majority, " Mr. Goizueta said, "and
there is an even wider margin when consumers are told, 'This is
a new Coca-cola. '"
Mr. Goizueta added,
" Some may choose to call this the
boldest single marketing move in the history of the packaged
goods business.
We simply call it the surest move ever made,
because the new taste of Coke was shaped by the taste of the
consumer .
Source: https://www.industrydocu?tents
cuntents.ucsf.edu/docs/lzyj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 447,
"image": "lzyj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "lzyj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 369
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nThe Coca Cola Company\nMedia Relations Department\nnews\nP.O. Drawer 1734, Allanta, Ga. 30301\nTelephone (404) 676-2121\nrelease\nFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE\nContact :\nCarlton Curtis\n404/676-2678\nCOCA-COLA BEGINS 100TH YEAR\nWITH A NEW TASTE;\nFIRST CHANGE EVER IN SECRET FORMULA\nNEW YORK, April 23, 1985 -- Coca-cola, the world's number\none consumer product, will begin its 100th year with a new\ntaste, representing the first change in the secret formula since\nCoca-cola was created in 1886.\n\"The best has been made even better,\" said Roberto C.\nGoizueta, chairman of the Board and chief executive officer of\nThe Coca-cola Company.\n\"We have changed the taste of the most\nuniversally enjoyed consumer product around the world.\n\"Consumers in blind taste tests all across the continent\nhave told us they prefer the new taste of Coca-cola to the\noriginal by an overwhelming majority, \" Mr. Goizueta said, \"and\nthere is an even wider margin when consumers are told, 'This is\na new Coca-cola. '\"\nMr. Goizueta added,\n\" Some may choose to call this the\nboldest single marketing move in the history of the packaged\ngoods business.\nWe simply call it the surest move ever made,\nbecause the new taste of Coke was shaped by the taste of the\nconsumer .\nSource: https://www.industrydocu?tents\ncuntents.ucsf.edu/docs/lzyj0226\n\nQuestion: Which year is COCA-COLA beginning with a new taste?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "100th year",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
935
|
What is the date mentioned?
|
April 23, 1985
|
Page 1
The Coca Cola Company
Media Relations Department
news
P.O. Drawer 1734, Allanta, Ga. 30301
Telephone (404) 676-2121
release
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact :
Carlton Curtis
404/676-2678
COCA-COLA BEGINS 100TH YEAR
WITH A NEW TASTE;
FIRST CHANGE EVER IN SECRET FORMULA
NEW YORK, April 23, 1985 -- Coca-cola, the world's number
one consumer product, will begin its 100th year with a new
taste, representing the first change in the secret formula since
Coca-cola was created in 1886.
"The best has been made even better," said Roberto C.
Goizueta, chairman of the Board and chief executive officer of
The Coca-cola Company.
"We have changed the taste of the most
universally enjoyed consumer product around the world.
"Consumers in blind taste tests all across the continent
have told us they prefer the new taste of Coca-cola to the
original by an overwhelming majority, " Mr. Goizueta said, "and
there is an even wider margin when consumers are told, 'This is
a new Coca-cola. '"
Mr. Goizueta added,
" Some may choose to call this the
boldest single marketing move in the history of the packaged
goods business.
We simply call it the surest move ever made,
because the new taste of Coke was shaped by the taste of the
consumer .
Source: https://www.industrydocu?tents
cuntents.ucsf.edu/docs/lzyj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 447,
"image": "lzyj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "lzyj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 366
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nThe Coca Cola Company\nMedia Relations Department\nnews\nP.O. Drawer 1734, Allanta, Ga. 30301\nTelephone (404) 676-2121\nrelease\nFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE\nContact :\nCarlton Curtis\n404/676-2678\nCOCA-COLA BEGINS 100TH YEAR\nWITH A NEW TASTE;\nFIRST CHANGE EVER IN SECRET FORMULA\nNEW YORK, April 23, 1985 -- Coca-cola, the world's number\none consumer product, will begin its 100th year with a new\ntaste, representing the first change in the secret formula since\nCoca-cola was created in 1886.\n\"The best has been made even better,\" said Roberto C.\nGoizueta, chairman of the Board and chief executive officer of\nThe Coca-cola Company.\n\"We have changed the taste of the most\nuniversally enjoyed consumer product around the world.\n\"Consumers in blind taste tests all across the continent\nhave told us they prefer the new taste of Coca-cola to the\noriginal by an overwhelming majority, \" Mr. Goizueta said, \"and\nthere is an even wider margin when consumers are told, 'This is\na new Coca-cola. '\"\nMr. Goizueta added,\n\" Some may choose to call this the\nboldest single marketing move in the history of the packaged\ngoods business.\nWe simply call it the surest move ever made,\nbecause the new taste of Coke was shaped by the taste of the\nconsumer .\nSource: https://www.industrydocu?tents\ncuntents.ucsf.edu/docs/lzyj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the date mentioned?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "April 23, 1985",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
936
|
what is widely distributed naturally occuring substance found in more than 60 plant species throughout he world?
|
caffeine
|
Page 3
Historical Background
Caffeine is a widely-distributed,
naturally-occurring substance found in
more than 60 plant species throughout
the world. Coffee beans, tea leaves, kola
nuts, and cocoa beans are among the
more common sources of caffeine con-
sumed by humans. People the world over
have enjoyed beverages made from these
natural sources for thousands of years.
Caffeine consumption dates back to
prehistoric times. The first written men-
tion of a caffeine-containing beverage,
tea, is traditionally attributed to the
legendary Chinese Emperor Shen Nung
in 2737 B.C. Historians generally agree
that coffee's consumption as a hot
beverage dates from about 1000 A.D.
and the coffee plant may have been
cultivated in Ethiopia as early as 575
A.D. In 1519, the Spanish Conquerors
were treated to a sweetened chocolate
drink by the Aztec Emperor Montezuma.
Small amounts of caffeine have been used
as a flavor component in cola and pepper
soft drinks since they originated in the
mid-1880's.1
Caffeine in Soft Drinks
Grocery shelves today offer a wide vari-
ety of soft drinks, each one formulated to
meet particular consumer taste
preferences. Some soft drinks contain
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/pkpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 444,
"image": "pkpj0226_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "pkpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 323
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nHistorical Background\nCaffeine is a widely-distributed,\nnaturally-occurring substance found in\nmore than 60 plant species throughout\nthe world. Coffee beans, tea leaves, kola\nnuts, and cocoa beans are among the\nmore common sources of caffeine con-\nsumed by humans. People the world over\nhave enjoyed beverages made from these\nnatural sources for thousands of years.\nCaffeine consumption dates back to\nprehistoric times. The first written men-\ntion of a caffeine-containing beverage,\ntea, is traditionally attributed to the\nlegendary Chinese Emperor Shen Nung\nin 2737 B.C. Historians generally agree\nthat coffee's consumption as a hot\nbeverage dates from about 1000 A.D.\nand the coffee plant may have been\ncultivated in Ethiopia as early as 575\nA.D. In 1519, the Spanish Conquerors\nwere treated to a sweetened chocolate\ndrink by the Aztec Emperor Montezuma.\nSmall amounts of caffeine have been used\nas a flavor component in cola and pepper\nsoft drinks since they originated in the\nmid-1880's.1\nCaffeine in Soft Drinks\nGrocery shelves today offer a wide vari-\nety of soft drinks, each one formulated to\nmeet particular consumer taste\npreferences. Some soft drinks contain\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/pkpj0226\n\nQuestion: what is widely distributed naturally occuring substance found in more than 60 plant species throughout he world?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "caffeine",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
937
|
Who said, "The best has been made even better"?
|
Roberto C. Goizueta, chairman of the Board and Chief executive officer of The Coca-Cola Company
|
Page 1
The Coca Cola Company
Media Relations Department
news
P.O. Drawer 1734, Allanta, Ga. 30301
Telephone (404) 676-2121
release
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact :
Carlton Curtis
404/676-2678
COCA-COLA BEGINS 100TH YEAR
WITH A NEW TASTE;
FIRST CHANGE EVER IN SECRET FORMULA
NEW YORK, April 23, 1985 -- Coca-cola, the world's number
one consumer product, will begin its 100th year with a new
taste, representing the first change in the secret formula since
Coca-cola was created in 1886.
"The best has been made even better," said Roberto C.
Goizueta, chairman of the Board and chief executive officer of
The Coca-cola Company.
"We have changed the taste of the most
universally enjoyed consumer product around the world.
"Consumers in blind taste tests all across the continent
have told us they prefer the new taste of Coca-cola to the
original by an overwhelming majority, " Mr. Goizueta said, "and
there is an even wider margin when consumers are told, 'This is
a new Coca-cola. '"
Mr. Goizueta added,
" Some may choose to call this the
boldest single marketing move in the history of the packaged
goods business.
We simply call it the surest move ever made,
because the new taste of Coke was shaped by the taste of the
consumer .
Source: https://www.industrydocu?tents
cuntents.ucsf.edu/docs/lzyj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 447,
"image": "lzyj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "lzyj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 386
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nThe Coca Cola Company\nMedia Relations Department\nnews\nP.O. Drawer 1734, Allanta, Ga. 30301\nTelephone (404) 676-2121\nrelease\nFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE\nContact :\nCarlton Curtis\n404/676-2678\nCOCA-COLA BEGINS 100TH YEAR\nWITH A NEW TASTE;\nFIRST CHANGE EVER IN SECRET FORMULA\nNEW YORK, April 23, 1985 -- Coca-cola, the world's number\none consumer product, will begin its 100th year with a new\ntaste, representing the first change in the secret formula since\nCoca-cola was created in 1886.\n\"The best has been made even better,\" said Roberto C.\nGoizueta, chairman of the Board and chief executive officer of\nThe Coca-cola Company.\n\"We have changed the taste of the most\nuniversally enjoyed consumer product around the world.\n\"Consumers in blind taste tests all across the continent\nhave told us they prefer the new taste of Coca-cola to the\noriginal by an overwhelming majority, \" Mr. Goizueta said, \"and\nthere is an even wider margin when consumers are told, 'This is\na new Coca-cola. '\"\nMr. Goizueta added,\n\" Some may choose to call this the\nboldest single marketing move in the history of the packaged\ngoods business.\nWe simply call it the surest move ever made,\nbecause the new taste of Coke was shaped by the taste of the\nconsumer .\nSource: https://www.industrydocu?tents\ncuntents.ucsf.edu/docs/lzyj0226\n\nQuestion: Who said, \"The best has been made even better\"?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Roberto C. Goizueta, chairman of the Board and Chief executive officer of The Coca-Cola Company",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
938
|
H ow many years of advertising is mentioned?
|
95
|
Page 1
Coke Isit!
news
Coca Cola's
Coker
release
COCA-COLA USA
Public Relations Department
P.O. Drawer 1734. Atlanta. Ga. 30301
elephone (404) 808-2121
CONTACT:
Tony Tortorici
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
404/898-3696
PAUSE TO REFLECT
95 YEARS OF ADVERTISING
FOR COCA-COLA
ATLANTA, Feb. 4, 1982 -- "Coke is it!" is the new advertising
theme for Coca-cola and the descendant of a series of slogans which are
as much a part of American life as Brand Coke itself.
Unveiled this week at a Coca-cola USA Bottlers' meeting in Atlanta,
"Coke is it!" is a bold concept which succeeds "Have a Coke and a
smile, " the main advertising theme for the product since 1979.
The new theme breaks from tradition by placing more emphasis on
the superiority of Coca-cola in taste, total refreshment and as
thirst quencher.
The direct, positive statement -- "Coke is it!" --
appeals to the forthright stance of Americans in the 1980s.
Throughout the history of Coca-cola, the Company's advertising
has accurately reflected attitudes of the times, often anticipating
changing lifestyles and the national temperament. Since 1886, adver-
tising for Coca-cola has portrayed fluctuations in social climate,
structure, values and politics.
AJT/RCW/1. 19.9
(more)
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/ztyj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 448,
"image": "ztyj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "ztyj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 369
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nCoke Isit!\nnews\nCoca Cola's\nCoker\nrelease\nCOCA-COLA USA\nPublic Relations Department\nP.O. Drawer 1734. Atlanta. Ga. 30301\nelephone (404) 808-2121\nCONTACT:\nTony Tortorici\nFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE\n404/898-3696\nPAUSE TO REFLECT\n95 YEARS OF ADVERTISING\nFOR COCA-COLA\nATLANTA, Feb. 4, 1982 -- \"Coke is it!\" is the new advertising\ntheme for Coca-cola and the descendant of a series of slogans which are\nas much a part of American life as Brand Coke itself.\nUnveiled this week at a Coca-cola USA Bottlers' meeting in Atlanta,\n\"Coke is it!\" is a bold concept which succeeds \"Have a Coke and a\nsmile, \" the main advertising theme for the product since 1979.\nThe new theme breaks from tradition by placing more emphasis on\nthe superiority of Coca-cola in taste, total refreshment and as\nthirst quencher.\nThe direct, positive statement -- \"Coke is it!\" --\nappeals to the forthright stance of Americans in the 1980s.\nThroughout the history of Coca-cola, the Company's advertising\nhas accurately reflected attitudes of the times, often anticipating\nchanging lifestyles and the national temperament. Since 1886, adver-\ntising for Coca-cola has portrayed fluctuations in social climate,\nstructure, values and politics.\nAJT/RCW/1. 19.9\n(more)\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/ztyj0226\n\nQuestion: H ow many years of advertising is mentioned?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "95",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
939
|
What is the date mentioned?
|
Feb. 4, 1982
|
Page 1
Coke Isit!
news
Coca Cola's
Coker
release
COCA-COLA USA
Public Relations Department
P.O. Drawer 1734. Atlanta. Ga. 30301
elephone (404) 808-2121
CONTACT:
Tony Tortorici
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
404/898-3696
PAUSE TO REFLECT
95 YEARS OF ADVERTISING
FOR COCA-COLA
ATLANTA, Feb. 4, 1982 -- "Coke is it!" is the new advertising
theme for Coca-cola and the descendant of a series of slogans which are
as much a part of American life as Brand Coke itself.
Unveiled this week at a Coca-cola USA Bottlers' meeting in Atlanta,
"Coke is it!" is a bold concept which succeeds "Have a Coke and a
smile, " the main advertising theme for the product since 1979.
The new theme breaks from tradition by placing more emphasis on
the superiority of Coca-cola in taste, total refreshment and as
thirst quencher.
The direct, positive statement -- "Coke is it!" --
appeals to the forthright stance of Americans in the 1980s.
Throughout the history of Coca-cola, the Company's advertising
has accurately reflected attitudes of the times, often anticipating
changing lifestyles and the national temperament. Since 1886, adver-
tising for Coca-cola has portrayed fluctuations in social climate,
structure, values and politics.
AJT/RCW/1. 19.9
(more)
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/ztyj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 448,
"image": "ztyj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "ztyj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 373
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nCoke Isit!\nnews\nCoca Cola's\nCoker\nrelease\nCOCA-COLA USA\nPublic Relations Department\nP.O. Drawer 1734. Atlanta. Ga. 30301\nelephone (404) 808-2121\nCONTACT:\nTony Tortorici\nFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE\n404/898-3696\nPAUSE TO REFLECT\n95 YEARS OF ADVERTISING\nFOR COCA-COLA\nATLANTA, Feb. 4, 1982 -- \"Coke is it!\" is the new advertising\ntheme for Coca-cola and the descendant of a series of slogans which are\nas much a part of American life as Brand Coke itself.\nUnveiled this week at a Coca-cola USA Bottlers' meeting in Atlanta,\n\"Coke is it!\" is a bold concept which succeeds \"Have a Coke and a\nsmile, \" the main advertising theme for the product since 1979.\nThe new theme breaks from tradition by placing more emphasis on\nthe superiority of Coca-cola in taste, total refreshment and as\nthirst quencher.\nThe direct, positive statement -- \"Coke is it!\" --\nappeals to the forthright stance of Americans in the 1980s.\nThroughout the history of Coca-cola, the Company's advertising\nhas accurately reflected attitudes of the times, often anticipating\nchanging lifestyles and the national temperament. Since 1886, adver-\ntising for Coca-cola has portrayed fluctuations in social climate,\nstructure, values and politics.\nAJT/RCW/1. 19.9\n(more)\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/ztyj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the date mentioned?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Feb. 4, 1982",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
940
|
who is traditionally attributed to legendary for the first written mention of a coffee containing beverage tea?
|
Chinese emperor Shen nung
|
Page 3
Historical Background
Caffeine is a widely-distributed,
naturally-occurring substance found in
more than 60 plant species throughout
the world. Coffee beans, tea leaves, kola
nuts, and cocoa beans are among the
more common sources of caffeine con-
sumed by humans. People the world over
have enjoyed beverages made from these
natural sources for thousands of years.
Caffeine consumption dates back to
prehistoric times. The first written men-
tion of a caffeine-containing beverage,
tea, is traditionally attributed to the
legendary Chinese Emperor Shen Nung
in 2737 B.C. Historians generally agree
that coffee's consumption as a hot
beverage dates from about 1000 A.D.
and the coffee plant may have been
cultivated in Ethiopia as early as 575
A.D. In 1519, the Spanish Conquerors
were treated to a sweetened chocolate
drink by the Aztec Emperor Montezuma.
Small amounts of caffeine have been used
as a flavor component in cola and pepper
soft drinks since they originated in the
mid-1880's.1
Caffeine in Soft Drinks
Grocery shelves today offer a wide vari-
ety of soft drinks, each one formulated to
meet particular consumer taste
preferences. Some soft drinks contain
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/pkpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 444,
"image": "pkpj0226_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "pkpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 325
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nHistorical Background\nCaffeine is a widely-distributed,\nnaturally-occurring substance found in\nmore than 60 plant species throughout\nthe world. Coffee beans, tea leaves, kola\nnuts, and cocoa beans are among the\nmore common sources of caffeine con-\nsumed by humans. People the world over\nhave enjoyed beverages made from these\nnatural sources for thousands of years.\nCaffeine consumption dates back to\nprehistoric times. The first written men-\ntion of a caffeine-containing beverage,\ntea, is traditionally attributed to the\nlegendary Chinese Emperor Shen Nung\nin 2737 B.C. Historians generally agree\nthat coffee's consumption as a hot\nbeverage dates from about 1000 A.D.\nand the coffee plant may have been\ncultivated in Ethiopia as early as 575\nA.D. In 1519, the Spanish Conquerors\nwere treated to a sweetened chocolate\ndrink by the Aztec Emperor Montezuma.\nSmall amounts of caffeine have been used\nas a flavor component in cola and pepper\nsoft drinks since they originated in the\nmid-1880's.1\nCaffeine in Soft Drinks\nGrocery shelves today offer a wide vari-\nety of soft drinks, each one formulated to\nmeet particular consumer taste\npreferences. Some soft drinks contain\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/pkpj0226\n\nQuestion: who is traditionally attributed to legendary for the first written mention of a coffee containing beverage tea?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Chinese emperor Shen nung",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
942
|
Whose name is mentioned to Contact?
|
Tony tortorici
|
Page 1
Coke Isit!
news
Coca Cola's
Coker
release
COCA-COLA USA
Public Relations Department
P.O. Drawer 1734. Atlanta. Ga. 30301
elephone (404) 808-2121
CONTACT:
Tony Tortorici
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
404/898-3696
PAUSE TO REFLECT
95 YEARS OF ADVERTISING
FOR COCA-COLA
ATLANTA, Feb. 4, 1982 -- "Coke is it!" is the new advertising
theme for Coca-cola and the descendant of a series of slogans which are
as much a part of American life as Brand Coke itself.
Unveiled this week at a Coca-cola USA Bottlers' meeting in Atlanta,
"Coke is it!" is a bold concept which succeeds "Have a Coke and a
smile, " the main advertising theme for the product since 1979.
The new theme breaks from tradition by placing more emphasis on
the superiority of Coca-cola in taste, total refreshment and as
thirst quencher.
The direct, positive statement -- "Coke is it!" --
appeals to the forthright stance of Americans in the 1980s.
Throughout the history of Coca-cola, the Company's advertising
has accurately reflected attitudes of the times, often anticipating
changing lifestyles and the national temperament. Since 1886, adver-
tising for Coca-cola has portrayed fluctuations in social climate,
structure, values and politics.
AJT/RCW/1. 19.9
(more)
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/ztyj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 448,
"image": "ztyj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "ztyj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 372
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nCoke Isit!\nnews\nCoca Cola's\nCoker\nrelease\nCOCA-COLA USA\nPublic Relations Department\nP.O. Drawer 1734. Atlanta. Ga. 30301\nelephone (404) 808-2121\nCONTACT:\nTony Tortorici\nFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE\n404/898-3696\nPAUSE TO REFLECT\n95 YEARS OF ADVERTISING\nFOR COCA-COLA\nATLANTA, Feb. 4, 1982 -- \"Coke is it!\" is the new advertising\ntheme for Coca-cola and the descendant of a series of slogans which are\nas much a part of American life as Brand Coke itself.\nUnveiled this week at a Coca-cola USA Bottlers' meeting in Atlanta,\n\"Coke is it!\" is a bold concept which succeeds \"Have a Coke and a\nsmile, \" the main advertising theme for the product since 1979.\nThe new theme breaks from tradition by placing more emphasis on\nthe superiority of Coca-cola in taste, total refreshment and as\nthirst quencher.\nThe direct, positive statement -- \"Coke is it!\" --\nappeals to the forthright stance of Americans in the 1980s.\nThroughout the history of Coca-cola, the Company's advertising\nhas accurately reflected attitudes of the times, often anticipating\nchanging lifestyles and the national temperament. Since 1886, adver-\ntising for Coca-cola has portrayed fluctuations in social climate,\nstructure, values and politics.\nAJT/RCW/1. 19.9\n(more)\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/ztyj0226\n\nQuestion: Whose name is mentioned to Contact?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Tony tortorici",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
944
|
who is the managing director of international litigation services ?
|
Joseph Thorpe
|
Page 3
ils
INTERNATIONAL
LITIGATION
SERVICES
CERTIFICATION OF TRANSLATION
International Litigation Services, a company specializing in international cases and foreign language
document processing, certifies the following:
International Litigation Services has retained a professional translator for the attached Japanese
into English document. The document is referred to as:
"TAK-SEITAT-00111731P-0001"
I affirm that such translation has been prepared by a duly qualified translator, who has confirmed
that such translation is, to the best of his/ her knowledge and belief, a true and accurate
translation in English of the corresponding Japanese document.
I declare under the penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct, Notwithstanding the
foregoing affirmations, no liability is assumed for errors and omissions in the translation of the
attached document.
Executed on this 28th day of August 2013, in Aliso Viejo, California.
Joseph Thorpe
Managing Director
International Litigation Services, Inc.
International Uffigation Services Inc. > 65 Enterprise . Aliso Viejo, California 32656
Phone: 828.313.4457 s Fax: 213.674.4191 . [email protected] . www.TEAM.com
NEW YORK . LOS ANGELES . LAS VEGAS * ORANGE COUNTY
Source: https://www.indup3790 0oosts.ucsf.edu/docs/zpjf0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 464,
"image": "zpjf0226_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "zpjf0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 326
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nils\nINTERNATIONAL\nLITIGATION\nSERVICES\nCERTIFICATION OF TRANSLATION\nInternational Litigation Services, a company specializing in international cases and foreign language\ndocument processing, certifies the following:\nInternational Litigation Services has retained a professional translator for the attached Japanese\ninto English document. The document is referred to as:\n\"TAK-SEITAT-00111731P-0001\"\nI affirm that such translation has been prepared by a duly qualified translator, who has confirmed\nthat such translation is, to the best of his/ her knowledge and belief, a true and accurate\ntranslation in English of the corresponding Japanese document.\nI declare under the penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct, Notwithstanding the\nforegoing affirmations, no liability is assumed for errors and omissions in the translation of the\nattached document.\nExecuted on this 28th day of August 2013, in Aliso Viejo, California.\nJoseph Thorpe\nManaging Director\nInternational Litigation Services, Inc.\nInternational Uffigation Services Inc. > 65 Enterprise . Aliso Viejo, California 32656\nPhone: 828.313.4457 s Fax: 213.674.4191 . [email protected] . www.TEAM.com\nNEW YORK . LOS ANGELES . LAS VEGAS * ORANGE COUNTY\nSource: https://www.indup3790 0oosts.ucsf.edu/docs/zpjf0226\n\nQuestion: who is the managing director of international litigation services ?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Joseph Thorpe",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
945
|
What is the heading of the document?
|
Response Document
|
Page 5
Response Document
o Introduction
o ACTOS male rat data summary
o Summary of presumed FDA data on mixed inhibitors
o Hypothesis for mechanism of action of ACTOS in
male rats
o Cohen hypothesis revisited and updated
o Renal effects (urine electrolytes, osmolality, PH)
o Liver effects (urine protein composition)
o PPAR agonism: a, y, mixed a, y
o Possible roles in bladder carcinogenesis
o Characterization of thiazolidinediones (pio vs. rosi)
Confidential - Subject to Protective Order
TAK-BAROND-0000076
Source: https://www.indup537qcoooosts.ucsf.edu/docs/xsjf0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 454,
"image": "xsjf0226_5.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "xsjf0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "5"
}
| 171
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 5\nResponse Document\no Introduction\no ACTOS male rat data summary\no Summary of presumed FDA data on mixed inhibitors\no Hypothesis for mechanism of action of ACTOS in\nmale rats\no Cohen hypothesis revisited and updated\no Renal effects (urine electrolytes, osmolality, PH)\no Liver effects (urine protein composition)\no PPAR agonism: a, y, mixed a, y\no Possible roles in bladder carcinogenesis\no Characterization of thiazolidinediones (pio vs. rosi)\nConfidential - Subject to Protective Order\nTAK-BAROND-0000076\nSource: https://www.indup537qcoooosts.ucsf.edu/docs/xsjf0226\n\nQuestion: What is the heading of the document?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Response Document",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
946
|
What are mixed with α, γ?
|
α, γ
|
Page 5
Response Document
o Introduction
o ACTOS male rat data summary
o Summary of presumed FDA data on mixed inhibitors
o Hypothesis for mechanism of action of ACTOS in
male rats
o Cohen hypothesis revisited and updated
o Renal effects (urine electrolytes, osmolality, PH)
o Liver effects (urine protein composition)
o PPAR agonism: a, y, mixed a, y
o Possible roles in bladder carcinogenesis
o Characterization of thiazolidinediones (pio vs. rosi)
Confidential - Subject to Protective Order
TAK-BAROND-0000076
Source: https://www.indup537qcoooosts.ucsf.edu/docs/xsjf0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 454,
"image": "xsjf0226_5.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "xsjf0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "5"
}
| 172
|
none
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 5\nResponse Document\no Introduction\no ACTOS male rat data summary\no Summary of presumed FDA data on mixed inhibitors\no Hypothesis for mechanism of action of ACTOS in\nmale rats\no Cohen hypothesis revisited and updated\no Renal effects (urine electrolytes, osmolality, PH)\no Liver effects (urine protein composition)\no PPAR agonism: a, y, mixed a, y\no Possible roles in bladder carcinogenesis\no Characterization of thiazolidinediones (pio vs. rosi)\nConfidential - Subject to Protective Order\nTAK-BAROND-0000076\nSource: https://www.indup537qcoooosts.ucsf.edu/docs/xsjf0226\n\nQuestion: What are mixed with α, γ?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "α, γ",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
947
|
What are the renal effects mentioned?
|
urine electrolytes, osmolality, pH
|
Page 5
Response Document
o Introduction
o ACTOS male rat data summary
o Summary of presumed FDA data on mixed inhibitors
o Hypothesis for mechanism of action of ACTOS in
male rats
o Cohen hypothesis revisited and updated
o Renal effects (urine electrolytes, osmolality, PH)
o Liver effects (urine protein composition)
o PPAR agonism: a, y, mixed a, y
o Possible roles in bladder carcinogenesis
o Characterization of thiazolidinediones (pio vs. rosi)
Confidential - Subject to Protective Order
TAK-BAROND-0000076
Source: https://www.indup537qcoooosts.ucsf.edu/docs/xsjf0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 454,
"image": "xsjf0226_5.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "xsjf0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "5"
}
| 178
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 5\nResponse Document\no Introduction\no ACTOS male rat data summary\no Summary of presumed FDA data on mixed inhibitors\no Hypothesis for mechanism of action of ACTOS in\nmale rats\no Cohen hypothesis revisited and updated\no Renal effects (urine electrolytes, osmolality, PH)\no Liver effects (urine protein composition)\no PPAR agonism: a, y, mixed a, y\no Possible roles in bladder carcinogenesis\no Characterization of thiazolidinediones (pio vs. rosi)\nConfidential - Subject to Protective Order\nTAK-BAROND-0000076\nSource: https://www.indup537qcoooosts.ucsf.edu/docs/xsjf0226\n\nQuestion: What are the renal effects mentioned?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "urine electrolytes, osmolality, pH",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
948
|
who were treated to a sweetened chocolate drink by aztec emporer montezuma?
|
spanish conquerors
|
Page 3
Historical Background
Caffeine is a widely-distributed,
naturally-occurring substance found in
more than 60 plant species throughout
the world. Coffee beans, tea leaves, kola
nuts, and cocoa beans are among the
more common sources of caffeine con-
sumed by humans. People the world over
have enjoyed beverages made from these
natural sources for thousands of years.
Caffeine consumption dates back to
prehistoric times. The first written men-
tion of a caffeine-containing beverage,
tea, is traditionally attributed to the
legendary Chinese Emperor Shen Nung
in 2737 B.C. Historians generally agree
that coffee's consumption as a hot
beverage dates from about 1000 A.D.
and the coffee plant may have been
cultivated in Ethiopia as early as 575
A.D. In 1519, the Spanish Conquerors
were treated to a sweetened chocolate
drink by the Aztec Emperor Montezuma.
Small amounts of caffeine have been used
as a flavor component in cola and pepper
soft drinks since they originated in the
mid-1880's.1
Caffeine in Soft Drinks
Grocery shelves today offer a wide vari-
ety of soft drinks, each one formulated to
meet particular consumer taste
preferences. Some soft drinks contain
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/pkpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 444,
"image": "pkpj0226_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "pkpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 324
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nHistorical Background\nCaffeine is a widely-distributed,\nnaturally-occurring substance found in\nmore than 60 plant species throughout\nthe world. Coffee beans, tea leaves, kola\nnuts, and cocoa beans are among the\nmore common sources of caffeine con-\nsumed by humans. People the world over\nhave enjoyed beverages made from these\nnatural sources for thousands of years.\nCaffeine consumption dates back to\nprehistoric times. The first written men-\ntion of a caffeine-containing beverage,\ntea, is traditionally attributed to the\nlegendary Chinese Emperor Shen Nung\nin 2737 B.C. Historians generally agree\nthat coffee's consumption as a hot\nbeverage dates from about 1000 A.D.\nand the coffee plant may have been\ncultivated in Ethiopia as early as 575\nA.D. In 1519, the Spanish Conquerors\nwere treated to a sweetened chocolate\ndrink by the Aztec Emperor Montezuma.\nSmall amounts of caffeine have been used\nas a flavor component in cola and pepper\nsoft drinks since they originated in the\nmid-1880's.1\nCaffeine in Soft Drinks\nGrocery shelves today offer a wide vari-\nety of soft drinks, each one formulated to\nmeet particular consumer taste\npreferences. Some soft drinks contain\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/pkpj0226\n\nQuestion: who were treated to a sweetened chocolate drink by aztec emporer montezuma?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "spanish conquerors",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
953
|
When it executed?
|
28th day of August 2013
|
Page 3
ils
INTERNATIONAL
LITIGATION
SERVICES
CERTIFICATION OF TRANSLATION
International Litigation Services, a company specializing in international cases and foreign language
document processing, certifies the following:
International Litigation Services has retained a professional translator for the attached Japanese
into English document. The document is referred to as:
"TAK-SEITAT-00111731P-0001"
I affirm that such translation has been prepared by a duly qualified translator, who has confirmed
that such translation is, to the best of his/ her knowledge and belief, a true and accurate
translation in English of the corresponding Japanese document.
I declare under the penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct, Notwithstanding the
foregoing affirmations, no liability is assumed for errors and omissions in the translation of the
attached document.
Executed on this 28th day of August 2013, in Aliso Viejo, California.
Joseph Thorpe
Managing Director
International Litigation Services, Inc.
International Uffigation Services Inc. > 65 Enterprise . Aliso Viejo, California 32656
Phone: 828.313.4457 s Fax: 213.674.4191 . [email protected] . www.TEAM.com
NEW YORK . LOS ANGELES . LAS VEGAS * ORANGE COUNTY
Source: https://www.indup3790 0oosts.ucsf.edu/docs/zpjf0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 464,
"image": "zpjf0226_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "zpjf0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 325
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nils\nINTERNATIONAL\nLITIGATION\nSERVICES\nCERTIFICATION OF TRANSLATION\nInternational Litigation Services, a company specializing in international cases and foreign language\ndocument processing, certifies the following:\nInternational Litigation Services has retained a professional translator for the attached Japanese\ninto English document. The document is referred to as:\n\"TAK-SEITAT-00111731P-0001\"\nI affirm that such translation has been prepared by a duly qualified translator, who has confirmed\nthat such translation is, to the best of his/ her knowledge and belief, a true and accurate\ntranslation in English of the corresponding Japanese document.\nI declare under the penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct, Notwithstanding the\nforegoing affirmations, no liability is assumed for errors and omissions in the translation of the\nattached document.\nExecuted on this 28th day of August 2013, in Aliso Viejo, California.\nJoseph Thorpe\nManaging Director\nInternational Litigation Services, Inc.\nInternational Uffigation Services Inc. > 65 Enterprise . Aliso Viejo, California 32656\nPhone: 828.313.4457 s Fax: 213.674.4191 . [email protected] . www.TEAM.com\nNEW YORK . LOS ANGELES . LAS VEGAS * ORANGE COUNTY\nSource: https://www.indup3790 0oosts.ucsf.edu/docs/zpjf0226\n\nQuestion: When it executed?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "28th day of August 2013",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
955
|
Where was the translation executed at?
|
In aliso Viejo, california
|
Page 3
ils
INTERNATIONAL
LITIGATION
SERVICES
CERTIFICATION OF TRANSLATION
International Litigation Services, a company specializing in international cases and foreign language
document processing, certifies the following:
International Litigation Services has retained a professional translator for the attached Japanese
into English document. The document is referred to as:
"TAK-SEITAT-00111731P-0001"
I affirm that such translation has been prepared by a duly qualified translator, who has confirmed
that such translation is, to the best of his/ her knowledge and belief, a true and accurate
translation in English of the corresponding Japanese document.
I declare under the penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct, Notwithstanding the
foregoing affirmations, no liability is assumed for errors and omissions in the translation of the
attached document.
Executed on this 28th day of August 2013, in Aliso Viejo, California.
Joseph Thorpe
Managing Director
International Litigation Services, Inc.
International Uffigation Services Inc. > 65 Enterprise . Aliso Viejo, California 32656
Phone: 828.313.4457 s Fax: 213.674.4191 . [email protected] . www.TEAM.com
NEW YORK . LOS ANGELES . LAS VEGAS * ORANGE COUNTY
Source: https://www.indup3790 0oosts.ucsf.edu/docs/zpjf0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 464,
"image": "zpjf0226_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "zpjf0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 327
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nils\nINTERNATIONAL\nLITIGATION\nSERVICES\nCERTIFICATION OF TRANSLATION\nInternational Litigation Services, a company specializing in international cases and foreign language\ndocument processing, certifies the following:\nInternational Litigation Services has retained a professional translator for the attached Japanese\ninto English document. The document is referred to as:\n\"TAK-SEITAT-00111731P-0001\"\nI affirm that such translation has been prepared by a duly qualified translator, who has confirmed\nthat such translation is, to the best of his/ her knowledge and belief, a true and accurate\ntranslation in English of the corresponding Japanese document.\nI declare under the penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct, Notwithstanding the\nforegoing affirmations, no liability is assumed for errors and omissions in the translation of the\nattached document.\nExecuted on this 28th day of August 2013, in Aliso Viejo, California.\nJoseph Thorpe\nManaging Director\nInternational Litigation Services, Inc.\nInternational Uffigation Services Inc. > 65 Enterprise . Aliso Viejo, California 32656\nPhone: 828.313.4457 s Fax: 213.674.4191 . [email protected] . www.TEAM.com\nNEW YORK . LOS ANGELES . LAS VEGAS * ORANGE COUNTY\nSource: https://www.indup3790 0oosts.ucsf.edu/docs/zpjf0226\n\nQuestion: Where was the translation executed at?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "In aliso Viejo, california",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.