question_id
int64 337
65.5k
| question
stringlengths 11
209
| answer
stringlengths 1
145
| document_text
stringlengths 30
7.9k
| page
int64 1
1
| other_metadata
dict | num_tokens
int64 26
1.76k
| match_type
stringclasses 3
values | messages
listlengths 2
2
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
552
|
To whom is this letter addressed?
|
R.Ferguson
|
Page 1
PHILIP MORRIS U. S. A.
INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
Richmond, Virginia
6502
C90-03100
To:
R. Ferguson
Date: May 29, 1990
From:
F. HSU 1 -
Subject: EPA/AWMA International Symposium, 1990
During May 1 - 4, I attended the International Symposium on Measurement of Toxic
and Related Air Pollutants sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Air &
Waste Management Association (AWMA) at Raleigh, North Carolina. The presentations were
divided into 20 sessions and each devoted to a specific topic. There were either three or four
concurrent sessions held in the morning and afternoon. An instrument exhibit was also held
involving about 65 vendors ranging from contract services, environmental sampling
equipments to analytical instrumentation. As in any multi-session meeting, time overlap
prevented the complete coverage all the presentations of interest. The following is a summary
of presentations grouped by specific subjects.
SUPERCRITICAL FLUID EXTRACTIONS (SFE)
As in other branches of science, the application of SFE in environmental sample
preparation has become increasingly popular in replacing or complimenting the classical
techniques such as Soxhlet extraction and thermal desorption. Most of the experiments used
supercritical carbon dioxide. The advantages in using SFE, as pointed out by J. Levy (Suprex
Corp.), were increased extraction efficiency, selectivity, shorter extraction time, ease of solvent
removal and the mild extraction conditions. The increased efficiency and reduced extraction
time resulted from the unique physical property of the supercritical fluids. The selectivity of
SFE can be controlled by varying the density/temperature of the liquids, adding polar organic
modifiers, selecting different SFE liquids and derivatization. Extraction of pollutants from
different matrices were shown to exemplify the versatility of the technique and the effect of
matrix on the extraction efficiency. SFE also offers the options for on-line (SFE-GC) and off-
line operating modes. However, for extraction of more polar solutes, the addition of polar
modifiers in the fluids imposes some limits for the on-line operation. One SFE application
particularly interesting to myself is the capability of class (functional group) fractionation. A
threshold density at which the solubility of a class of compounds maximizes needs to be
defined experimentally. With pressure programming and SFE-GC, an automated smoke
analysis system is potentially possible.
Some sorbent media were tested for SFE of air toxics by several authors. J. Raymer
(Research Triangle Institute, NC) extracted Tenax and Polyimides loaded with semi-volatiles,
pesticides and PAH's with supercritical CO, . He concluded that supercritical CO, was very
effective in recovering the target compounds from Tenax. Higher volume of fluids or fluids
2022155944
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 336,
"image": "qhxj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "qhxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 654
|
none
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS U. S. A.\nINTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\n6502\nC90-03100\nTo:\nR. Ferguson\nDate: May 29, 1990\nFrom:\nF. HSU 1 -\nSubject: EPA/AWMA International Symposium, 1990\nDuring May 1 - 4, I attended the International Symposium on Measurement of Toxic\nand Related Air Pollutants sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Air &\nWaste Management Association (AWMA) at Raleigh, North Carolina. The presentations were\ndivided into 20 sessions and each devoted to a specific topic. There were either three or four\nconcurrent sessions held in the morning and afternoon. An instrument exhibit was also held\ninvolving about 65 vendors ranging from contract services, environmental sampling\nequipments to analytical instrumentation. As in any multi-session meeting, time overlap\nprevented the complete coverage all the presentations of interest. The following is a summary\nof presentations grouped by specific subjects.\nSUPERCRITICAL FLUID EXTRACTIONS (SFE)\nAs in other branches of science, the application of SFE in environmental sample\npreparation has become increasingly popular in replacing or complimenting the classical\ntechniques such as Soxhlet extraction and thermal desorption. Most of the experiments used\nsupercritical carbon dioxide. The advantages in using SFE, as pointed out by J. Levy (Suprex\nCorp.), were increased extraction efficiency, selectivity, shorter extraction time, ease of solvent\nremoval and the mild extraction conditions. The increased efficiency and reduced extraction\ntime resulted from the unique physical property of the supercritical fluids. The selectivity of\nSFE can be controlled by varying the density/temperature of the liquids, adding polar organic\nmodifiers, selecting different SFE liquids and derivatization. Extraction of pollutants from\ndifferent matrices were shown to exemplify the versatility of the technique and the effect of\nmatrix on the extraction efficiency. SFE also offers the options for on-line (SFE-GC) and off-\nline operating modes. However, for extraction of more polar solutes, the addition of polar\nmodifiers in the fluids imposes some limits for the on-line operation. One SFE application\nparticularly interesting to myself is the capability of class (functional group) fractionation. A\nthreshold density at which the solubility of a class of compounds maximizes needs to be\ndefined experimentally. With pressure programming and SFE-GC, an automated smoke\nanalysis system is potentially possible.\nSome sorbent media were tested for SFE of air toxics by several authors. J. Raymer\n(Research Triangle Institute, NC) extracted Tenax and Polyimides loaded with semi-volatiles,\npesticides and PAH's with supercritical CO, . He concluded that supercritical CO, was very\neffective in recovering the target compounds from Tenax. Higher volume of fluids or fluids\n2022155944\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037\n\nQuestion: To whom is this letter addressed?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "R.Ferguson",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
559
|
What is the subject of the document?
|
EPA/AWMA International Symposium, 1990
|
Page 1
PHILIP MORRIS U. S. A.
INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
Richmond, Virginia
6502
C90-03100
To:
R. Ferguson
Date: May 29, 1990
From:
F. HSU 1 -
Subject: EPA/AWMA International Symposium, 1990
During May 1 - 4, I attended the International Symposium on Measurement of Toxic
and Related Air Pollutants sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Air &
Waste Management Association (AWMA) at Raleigh, North Carolina. The presentations were
divided into 20 sessions and each devoted to a specific topic. There were either three or four
concurrent sessions held in the morning and afternoon. An instrument exhibit was also held
involving about 65 vendors ranging from contract services, environmental sampling
equipments to analytical instrumentation. As in any multi-session meeting, time overlap
prevented the complete coverage all the presentations of interest. The following is a summary
of presentations grouped by specific subjects.
SUPERCRITICAL FLUID EXTRACTIONS (SFE)
As in other branches of science, the application of SFE in environmental sample
preparation has become increasingly popular in replacing or complimenting the classical
techniques such as Soxhlet extraction and thermal desorption. Most of the experiments used
supercritical carbon dioxide. The advantages in using SFE, as pointed out by J. Levy (Suprex
Corp.), were increased extraction efficiency, selectivity, shorter extraction time, ease of solvent
removal and the mild extraction conditions. The increased efficiency and reduced extraction
time resulted from the unique physical property of the supercritical fluids. The selectivity of
SFE can be controlled by varying the density/temperature of the liquids, adding polar organic
modifiers, selecting different SFE liquids and derivatization. Extraction of pollutants from
different matrices were shown to exemplify the versatility of the technique and the effect of
matrix on the extraction efficiency. SFE also offers the options for on-line (SFE-GC) and off-
line operating modes. However, for extraction of more polar solutes, the addition of polar
modifiers in the fluids imposes some limits for the on-line operation. One SFE application
particularly interesting to myself is the capability of class (functional group) fractionation. A
threshold density at which the solubility of a class of compounds maximizes needs to be
defined experimentally. With pressure programming and SFE-GC, an automated smoke
analysis system is potentially possible.
Some sorbent media were tested for SFE of air toxics by several authors. J. Raymer
(Research Triangle Institute, NC) extracted Tenax and Polyimides loaded with semi-volatiles,
pesticides and PAH's with supercritical CO, . He concluded that supercritical CO, was very
effective in recovering the target compounds from Tenax. Higher volume of fluids or fluids
2022155944
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 336,
"image": "qhxj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "qhxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 663
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS U. S. A.\nINTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\n6502\nC90-03100\nTo:\nR. Ferguson\nDate: May 29, 1990\nFrom:\nF. HSU 1 -\nSubject: EPA/AWMA International Symposium, 1990\nDuring May 1 - 4, I attended the International Symposium on Measurement of Toxic\nand Related Air Pollutants sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Air &\nWaste Management Association (AWMA) at Raleigh, North Carolina. The presentations were\ndivided into 20 sessions and each devoted to a specific topic. There were either three or four\nconcurrent sessions held in the morning and afternoon. An instrument exhibit was also held\ninvolving about 65 vendors ranging from contract services, environmental sampling\nequipments to analytical instrumentation. As in any multi-session meeting, time overlap\nprevented the complete coverage all the presentations of interest. The following is a summary\nof presentations grouped by specific subjects.\nSUPERCRITICAL FLUID EXTRACTIONS (SFE)\nAs in other branches of science, the application of SFE in environmental sample\npreparation has become increasingly popular in replacing or complimenting the classical\ntechniques such as Soxhlet extraction and thermal desorption. Most of the experiments used\nsupercritical carbon dioxide. The advantages in using SFE, as pointed out by J. Levy (Suprex\nCorp.), were increased extraction efficiency, selectivity, shorter extraction time, ease of solvent\nremoval and the mild extraction conditions. The increased efficiency and reduced extraction\ntime resulted from the unique physical property of the supercritical fluids. The selectivity of\nSFE can be controlled by varying the density/temperature of the liquids, adding polar organic\nmodifiers, selecting different SFE liquids and derivatization. Extraction of pollutants from\ndifferent matrices were shown to exemplify the versatility of the technique and the effect of\nmatrix on the extraction efficiency. SFE also offers the options for on-line (SFE-GC) and off-\nline operating modes. However, for extraction of more polar solutes, the addition of polar\nmodifiers in the fluids imposes some limits for the on-line operation. One SFE application\nparticularly interesting to myself is the capability of class (functional group) fractionation. A\nthreshold density at which the solubility of a class of compounds maximizes needs to be\ndefined experimentally. With pressure programming and SFE-GC, an automated smoke\nanalysis system is potentially possible.\nSome sorbent media were tested for SFE of air toxics by several authors. J. Raymer\n(Research Triangle Institute, NC) extracted Tenax and Polyimides loaded with semi-volatiles,\npesticides and PAH's with supercritical CO, . He concluded that supercritical CO, was very\neffective in recovering the target compounds from Tenax. Higher volume of fluids or fluids\n2022155944\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the subject of the document?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "EPA/AWMA International Symposium, 1990",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
560
|
What is the 10 digits number mentioned in bold on the right margin, at the bottom?
|
2022155944
|
Page 1
PHILIP MORRIS U. S. A.
INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
Richmond, Virginia
6502
C90-03100
To:
R. Ferguson
Date: May 29, 1990
From:
F. HSU 1 -
Subject: EPA/AWMA International Symposium, 1990
During May 1 - 4, I attended the International Symposium on Measurement of Toxic
and Related Air Pollutants sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Air &
Waste Management Association (AWMA) at Raleigh, North Carolina. The presentations were
divided into 20 sessions and each devoted to a specific topic. There were either three or four
concurrent sessions held in the morning and afternoon. An instrument exhibit was also held
involving about 65 vendors ranging from contract services, environmental sampling
equipments to analytical instrumentation. As in any multi-session meeting, time overlap
prevented the complete coverage all the presentations of interest. The following is a summary
of presentations grouped by specific subjects.
SUPERCRITICAL FLUID EXTRACTIONS (SFE)
As in other branches of science, the application of SFE in environmental sample
preparation has become increasingly popular in replacing or complimenting the classical
techniques such as Soxhlet extraction and thermal desorption. Most of the experiments used
supercritical carbon dioxide. The advantages in using SFE, as pointed out by J. Levy (Suprex
Corp.), were increased extraction efficiency, selectivity, shorter extraction time, ease of solvent
removal and the mild extraction conditions. The increased efficiency and reduced extraction
time resulted from the unique physical property of the supercritical fluids. The selectivity of
SFE can be controlled by varying the density/temperature of the liquids, adding polar organic
modifiers, selecting different SFE liquids and derivatization. Extraction of pollutants from
different matrices were shown to exemplify the versatility of the technique and the effect of
matrix on the extraction efficiency. SFE also offers the options for on-line (SFE-GC) and off-
line operating modes. However, for extraction of more polar solutes, the addition of polar
modifiers in the fluids imposes some limits for the on-line operation. One SFE application
particularly interesting to myself is the capability of class (functional group) fractionation. A
threshold density at which the solubility of a class of compounds maximizes needs to be
defined experimentally. With pressure programming and SFE-GC, an automated smoke
analysis system is potentially possible.
Some sorbent media were tested for SFE of air toxics by several authors. J. Raymer
(Research Triangle Institute, NC) extracted Tenax and Polyimides loaded with semi-volatiles,
pesticides and PAH's with supercritical CO, . He concluded that supercritical CO, was very
effective in recovering the target compounds from Tenax. Higher volume of fluids or fluids
2022155944
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 336,
"image": "qhxj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "qhxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 667
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS U. S. A.\nINTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\n6502\nC90-03100\nTo:\nR. Ferguson\nDate: May 29, 1990\nFrom:\nF. HSU 1 -\nSubject: EPA/AWMA International Symposium, 1990\nDuring May 1 - 4, I attended the International Symposium on Measurement of Toxic\nand Related Air Pollutants sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Air &\nWaste Management Association (AWMA) at Raleigh, North Carolina. The presentations were\ndivided into 20 sessions and each devoted to a specific topic. There were either three or four\nconcurrent sessions held in the morning and afternoon. An instrument exhibit was also held\ninvolving about 65 vendors ranging from contract services, environmental sampling\nequipments to analytical instrumentation. As in any multi-session meeting, time overlap\nprevented the complete coverage all the presentations of interest. The following is a summary\nof presentations grouped by specific subjects.\nSUPERCRITICAL FLUID EXTRACTIONS (SFE)\nAs in other branches of science, the application of SFE in environmental sample\npreparation has become increasingly popular in replacing or complimenting the classical\ntechniques such as Soxhlet extraction and thermal desorption. Most of the experiments used\nsupercritical carbon dioxide. The advantages in using SFE, as pointed out by J. Levy (Suprex\nCorp.), were increased extraction efficiency, selectivity, shorter extraction time, ease of solvent\nremoval and the mild extraction conditions. The increased efficiency and reduced extraction\ntime resulted from the unique physical property of the supercritical fluids. The selectivity of\nSFE can be controlled by varying the density/temperature of the liquids, adding polar organic\nmodifiers, selecting different SFE liquids and derivatization. Extraction of pollutants from\ndifferent matrices were shown to exemplify the versatility of the technique and the effect of\nmatrix on the extraction efficiency. SFE also offers the options for on-line (SFE-GC) and off-\nline operating modes. However, for extraction of more polar solutes, the addition of polar\nmodifiers in the fluids imposes some limits for the on-line operation. One SFE application\nparticularly interesting to myself is the capability of class (functional group) fractionation. A\nthreshold density at which the solubility of a class of compounds maximizes needs to be\ndefined experimentally. With pressure programming and SFE-GC, an automated smoke\nanalysis system is potentially possible.\nSome sorbent media were tested for SFE of air toxics by several authors. J. Raymer\n(Research Triangle Institute, NC) extracted Tenax and Polyimides loaded with semi-volatiles,\npesticides and PAH's with supercritical CO, . He concluded that supercritical CO, was very\neffective in recovering the target compounds from Tenax. Higher volume of fluids or fluids\n2022155944\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the 10 digits number mentioned in bold on the right margin, at the bottom?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "2022155944",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
561
|
How many months have the data given here been extracted?
|
12
|
Page 10
Consumer Dynamics
B&W
CAPRI
index
. Retention of Franchise:
79.2%
Rate of Switching Losses
( 98)
10.3%
Rate of Quitting Losses
( 97)
10.5%
(127)
. Single Brand Users in the Franchise:
83.8%
(119)
. Share of Industry Switchers Gained:
1.7%
(170)
Share of the 21-25 Segment:
0.5%
( 50)
... ..
314002839
Source: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 337,
"image": "rzbj0037_10.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rzbj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "10"
}
| 167
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 10\nConsumer Dynamics\nB&W\nCAPRI\nindex\n. Retention of Franchise:\n79.2%\nRate of Switching Losses\n( 98)\n10.3%\nRate of Quitting Losses\n( 97)\n10.5%\n(127)\n. Single Brand Users in the Franchise:\n83.8%\n(119)\n. Share of Industry Switchers Gained:\n1.7%\n(170)\nShare of the 21-25 Segment:\n0.5%\n( 50)\n... ..\n314002839\nSource: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037\n\nQuestion: How many months have the data given here been extracted?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "12",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
562
|
What is the Retention of Franchise?
|
79.2%
|
Page 10
Consumer Dynamics
B&W
CAPRI
index
. Retention of Franchise:
79.2%
Rate of Switching Losses
( 98)
10.3%
Rate of Quitting Losses
( 97)
10.5%
(127)
. Single Brand Users in the Franchise:
83.8%
(119)
. Share of Industry Switchers Gained:
1.7%
(170)
Share of the 21-25 Segment:
0.5%
( 50)
... ..
314002839
Source: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 337,
"image": "rzbj0037_10.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rzbj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "10"
}
| 168
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 10\nConsumer Dynamics\nB&W\nCAPRI\nindex\n. Retention of Franchise:\n79.2%\nRate of Switching Losses\n( 98)\n10.3%\nRate of Quitting Losses\n( 97)\n10.5%\n(127)\n. Single Brand Users in the Franchise:\n83.8%\n(119)\n. Share of Industry Switchers Gained:\n1.7%\n(170)\nShare of the 21-25 Segment:\n0.5%\n( 50)\n... ..\n314002839\nSource: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the Retention of Franchise?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "79.2%",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
563
|
What is the Index of Single Brand Users in the Franchise?
|
119
|
Page 10
Consumer Dynamics
B&W
CAPRI
index
. Retention of Franchise:
79.2%
Rate of Switching Losses
( 98)
10.3%
Rate of Quitting Losses
( 97)
10.5%
(127)
. Single Brand Users in the Franchise:
83.8%
(119)
. Share of Industry Switchers Gained:
1.7%
(170)
Share of the 21-25 Segment:
0.5%
( 50)
... ..
314002839
Source: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 337,
"image": "rzbj0037_10.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rzbj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "10"
}
| 169
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 10\nConsumer Dynamics\nB&W\nCAPRI\nindex\n. Retention of Franchise:\n79.2%\nRate of Switching Losses\n( 98)\n10.3%\nRate of Quitting Losses\n( 97)\n10.5%\n(127)\n. Single Brand Users in the Franchise:\n83.8%\n(119)\n. Share of Industry Switchers Gained:\n1.7%\n(170)\nShare of the 21-25 Segment:\n0.5%\n( 50)\n... ..\n314002839\nSource: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the Index of Single Brand Users in the Franchise?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "119",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
564
|
What is the share of the 21-25 segment mentioned?
|
0.5%
|
Page 10
Consumer Dynamics
B&W
CAPRI
index
. Retention of Franchise:
79.2%
Rate of Switching Losses
( 98)
10.3%
Rate of Quitting Losses
( 97)
10.5%
(127)
. Single Brand Users in the Franchise:
83.8%
(119)
. Share of Industry Switchers Gained:
1.7%
(170)
Share of the 21-25 Segment:
0.5%
( 50)
... ..
314002839
Source: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 337,
"image": "rzbj0037_10.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rzbj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "10"
}
| 172
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 10\nConsumer Dynamics\nB&W\nCAPRI\nindex\n. Retention of Franchise:\n79.2%\nRate of Switching Losses\n( 98)\n10.3%\nRate of Quitting Losses\n( 97)\n10.5%\n(127)\n. Single Brand Users in the Franchise:\n83.8%\n(119)\n. Share of Industry Switchers Gained:\n1.7%\n(170)\nShare of the 21-25 Segment:\n0.5%\n( 50)\n... ..\n314002839\nSource: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the share of the 21-25 segment mentioned?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0.5%",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
565
|
What is the status of the KOOL MILDS KS?
|
Kool "C" with 0.63% menthol was implemented in April 1995
|
Page 7
B&
KOOL MILDS KS
Objective
. Using KOOL "C" Technologies, Develop A KOOL Milds KS
Product Which Tests At Parity Or Better To Current KOOL
Milds KS Among KOOL Milds KS Smokers
CPT Results
. KOOL "C" Was At Parity With Current KOOL Milds KS
Among KOOL Milds KS Smokers
. KOOL Milds KS Smokers Found KOOL "C" To Have More
Menthol, Better Menthol Taste And Better Tobacco Taste
399000384
Status.
. KOOL "C" With 0.63% Menthol Was Implemented In
April 1995
DMPG
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 339,
"image": "hyhk0037_7.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "hyhk0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "7"
}
| 206
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 7\nB&\nKOOL MILDS KS\nObjective\n. Using KOOL \"C\" Technologies, Develop A KOOL Milds KS\nProduct Which Tests At Parity Or Better To Current KOOL\nMilds KS Among KOOL Milds KS Smokers\nCPT Results\n. KOOL \"C\" Was At Parity With Current KOOL Milds KS\nAmong KOOL Milds KS Smokers\n. KOOL Milds KS Smokers Found KOOL \"C\" To Have More\nMenthol, Better Menthol Taste And Better Tobacco Taste\n399000384\nStatus.\n. KOOL \"C\" With 0.63% Menthol Was Implemented In\nApril 1995\nDMPG\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037\n\nQuestion: What is the status of the KOOL MILDS KS?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Kool \"C\" with 0.63% menthol was implemented in April 1995",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
566
|
What is the objective of the KOOL MILDS KS?
|
Using Kool "C" Technologies, Develop a Kool Milds KS Product which Tests at Parity or Better to Current Kool Milds KS among Kool Milds KS Smokers
|
Page 7
B&
KOOL MILDS KS
Objective
. Using KOOL "C" Technologies, Develop A KOOL Milds KS
Product Which Tests At Parity Or Better To Current KOOL
Milds KS Among KOOL Milds KS Smokers
CPT Results
. KOOL "C" Was At Parity With Current KOOL Milds KS
Among KOOL Milds KS Smokers
. KOOL Milds KS Smokers Found KOOL "C" To Have More
Menthol, Better Menthol Taste And Better Tobacco Taste
399000384
Status.
. KOOL "C" With 0.63% Menthol Was Implemented In
April 1995
DMPG
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 339,
"image": "hyhk0037_7.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "hyhk0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "7"
}
| 224
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 7\nB&\nKOOL MILDS KS\nObjective\n. Using KOOL \"C\" Technologies, Develop A KOOL Milds KS\nProduct Which Tests At Parity Or Better To Current KOOL\nMilds KS Among KOOL Milds KS Smokers\nCPT Results\n. KOOL \"C\" Was At Parity With Current KOOL Milds KS\nAmong KOOL Milds KS Smokers\n. KOOL Milds KS Smokers Found KOOL \"C\" To Have More\nMenthol, Better Menthol Taste And Better Tobacco Taste\n399000384\nStatus.\n. KOOL \"C\" With 0.63% Menthol Was Implemented In\nApril 1995\nDMPG\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037\n\nQuestion: What is the objective of the KOOL MILDS KS?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Using Kool \"C\" Technologies, Develop a Kool Milds KS Product which Tests at Parity or Better to Current Kool Milds KS among Kool Milds KS Smokers",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
567
|
What is the name of the company?
|
B&W
|
Page 7
B&
KOOL MILDS KS
Objective
. Using KOOL "C" Technologies, Develop A KOOL Milds KS
Product Which Tests At Parity Or Better To Current KOOL
Milds KS Among KOOL Milds KS Smokers
CPT Results
. KOOL "C" Was At Parity With Current KOOL Milds KS
Among KOOL Milds KS Smokers
. KOOL Milds KS Smokers Found KOOL "C" To Have More
Menthol, Better Menthol Taste And Better Tobacco Taste
399000384
Status.
. KOOL "C" With 0.63% Menthol Was Implemented In
April 1995
DMPG
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 339,
"image": "hyhk0037_7.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "hyhk0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "7"
}
| 184
|
none
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 7\nB&\nKOOL MILDS KS\nObjective\n. Using KOOL \"C\" Technologies, Develop A KOOL Milds KS\nProduct Which Tests At Parity Or Better To Current KOOL\nMilds KS Among KOOL Milds KS Smokers\nCPT Results\n. KOOL \"C\" Was At Parity With Current KOOL Milds KS\nAmong KOOL Milds KS Smokers\n. KOOL Milds KS Smokers Found KOOL \"C\" To Have More\nMenthol, Better Menthol Taste And Better Tobacco Taste\n399000384\nStatus.\n. KOOL \"C\" With 0.63% Menthol Was Implemented In\nApril 1995\nDMPG\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037\n\nQuestion: What is the name of the company?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B&W",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
568
|
When was the KOOL "C" With 0.63% Menthol Implemented?
|
April 1995
|
Page 7
B&
KOOL MILDS KS
Objective
. Using KOOL "C" Technologies, Develop A KOOL Milds KS
Product Which Tests At Parity Or Better To Current KOOL
Milds KS Among KOOL Milds KS Smokers
CPT Results
. KOOL "C" Was At Parity With Current KOOL Milds KS
Among KOOL Milds KS Smokers
. KOOL Milds KS Smokers Found KOOL "C" To Have More
Menthol, Better Menthol Taste And Better Tobacco Taste
399000384
Status.
. KOOL "C" With 0.63% Menthol Was Implemented In
April 1995
DMPG
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 339,
"image": "hyhk0037_7.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "hyhk0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "7"
}
| 196
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 7\nB&\nKOOL MILDS KS\nObjective\n. Using KOOL \"C\" Technologies, Develop A KOOL Milds KS\nProduct Which Tests At Parity Or Better To Current KOOL\nMilds KS Among KOOL Milds KS Smokers\nCPT Results\n. KOOL \"C\" Was At Parity With Current KOOL Milds KS\nAmong KOOL Milds KS Smokers\n. KOOL Milds KS Smokers Found KOOL \"C\" To Have More\nMenthol, Better Menthol Taste And Better Tobacco Taste\n399000384\nStatus.\n. KOOL \"C\" With 0.63% Menthol Was Implemented In\nApril 1995\nDMPG\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037\n\nQuestion: When was the KOOL \"C\" With 0.63% Menthol Implemented?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "April 1995",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
569
|
Whose assistance will be provided in the manufacture of these tobacco products?
|
R&D Assistance
|
Page 2
- 2 -
The redried burley (MT-778) in this blend will be staged; therefore, it will
need to be run to the redried pack out bulker. It will be subsequently used
for the rest of the BEST primaries. Please make the appropriate arrangements
necessary to accomplish this. Quality should perform the appropriate
analytical tests on this operation. The tobacco will be approved before
usage.
The reconstituted tobacco portions (EBR & CPCL) that will be used for these
primary operations must come from the following lot numbers:
MA 0402 (EBR # Range 00835200 - 00836415)
MA 0625 (CPCL # Range 00852595 - 00852710)
Therefore, please make the necessary arrangements required to pull tobaccos
from these specified lot numbers for regular production usage starting the
week of April 8, 1991.
Once the grade bins have been filled with the appropriate reconstituted
tobacco, 1,500 1bs. of conditioned EBR and 500 1bs. of conditioned CPCL will
be "caught off". These tobaccos will be shipped to R&D Development Center by
refrigerated truck on April 10, 1991. Please supply the appropriate big pack
boxes to accomplish this.
These primary operations will be run starting the week of April 8, 1991.
Excess MT-768 D tobacco may be blended into any domestic non-menthol blend at
58 or less
Excess MT-778 tobacco may be blended into Richland and/or Amelia redried
burleys at 18 or less.
Labels that will be used to identify these tobaccos can be obtained from
Wayne Sanders, Macon Q.A.
Charge all expenses to 02-327.
Ship all tobaccos to:
B & W Tobacco Corporation
Development Center, Dock 10F
Lee & Mccloskey Streets
Louisville, Kentucky
Attn: B. A. Bandy
R&D assistance will be provided in the manufacture of these tobacco products.
If there are any questions, please advise.
T. E. B.
p3614
Attachment
583232682
Source: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 342,
"image": "lycj0037_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "lycj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 508
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\n- 2 -\nThe redried burley (MT-778) in this blend will be staged; therefore, it will\nneed to be run to the redried pack out bulker. It will be subsequently used\nfor the rest of the BEST primaries. Please make the appropriate arrangements\nnecessary to accomplish this. Quality should perform the appropriate\nanalytical tests on this operation. The tobacco will be approved before\nusage.\nThe reconstituted tobacco portions (EBR & CPCL) that will be used for these\nprimary operations must come from the following lot numbers:\nMA 0402 (EBR # Range 00835200 - 00836415)\nMA 0625 (CPCL # Range 00852595 - 00852710)\nTherefore, please make the necessary arrangements required to pull tobaccos\nfrom these specified lot numbers for regular production usage starting the\nweek of April 8, 1991.\nOnce the grade bins have been filled with the appropriate reconstituted\ntobacco, 1,500 1bs. of conditioned EBR and 500 1bs. of conditioned CPCL will\nbe \"caught off\". These tobaccos will be shipped to R&D Development Center by\nrefrigerated truck on April 10, 1991. Please supply the appropriate big pack\nboxes to accomplish this.\nThese primary operations will be run starting the week of April 8, 1991.\nExcess MT-768 D tobacco may be blended into any domestic non-menthol blend at\n58 or less\nExcess MT-778 tobacco may be blended into Richland and/or Amelia redried\nburleys at 18 or less.\nLabels that will be used to identify these tobaccos can be obtained from\nWayne Sanders, Macon Q.A.\nCharge all expenses to 02-327.\nShip all tobaccos to:\nB & W Tobacco Corporation\nDevelopment Center, Dock 10F\nLee & Mccloskey Streets\nLouisville, Kentucky\nAttn: B. A. Bandy\nR&D assistance will be provided in the manufacture of these tobacco products.\nIf there are any questions, please advise.\nT. E. B.\np3614\nAttachment\n583232682\nSource: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037\n\nQuestion: Whose assistance will be provided in the manufacture of these tobacco products?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "R&D Assistance",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
570
|
Where is the tobacco being shipped to?
|
B&W Tobacco Corporation, Development Center, Dock 10F, Lee & McCloskey Streets, Louisville , Kentucky
|
Page 2
- 2 -
The redried burley (MT-778) in this blend will be staged; therefore, it will
need to be run to the redried pack out bulker. It will be subsequently used
for the rest of the BEST primaries. Please make the appropriate arrangements
necessary to accomplish this. Quality should perform the appropriate
analytical tests on this operation. The tobacco will be approved before
usage.
The reconstituted tobacco portions (EBR & CPCL) that will be used for these
primary operations must come from the following lot numbers:
MA 0402 (EBR # Range 00835200 - 00836415)
MA 0625 (CPCL # Range 00852595 - 00852710)
Therefore, please make the necessary arrangements required to pull tobaccos
from these specified lot numbers for regular production usage starting the
week of April 8, 1991.
Once the grade bins have been filled with the appropriate reconstituted
tobacco, 1,500 1bs. of conditioned EBR and 500 1bs. of conditioned CPCL will
be "caught off". These tobaccos will be shipped to R&D Development Center by
refrigerated truck on April 10, 1991. Please supply the appropriate big pack
boxes to accomplish this.
These primary operations will be run starting the week of April 8, 1991.
Excess MT-768 D tobacco may be blended into any domestic non-menthol blend at
58 or less
Excess MT-778 tobacco may be blended into Richland and/or Amelia redried
burleys at 18 or less.
Labels that will be used to identify these tobaccos can be obtained from
Wayne Sanders, Macon Q.A.
Charge all expenses to 02-327.
Ship all tobaccos to:
B & W Tobacco Corporation
Development Center, Dock 10F
Lee & Mccloskey Streets
Louisville, Kentucky
Attn: B. A. Bandy
R&D assistance will be provided in the manufacture of these tobacco products.
If there are any questions, please advise.
T. E. B.
p3614
Attachment
583232682
Source: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 342,
"image": "lycj0037_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "lycj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 522
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\n- 2 -\nThe redried burley (MT-778) in this blend will be staged; therefore, it will\nneed to be run to the redried pack out bulker. It will be subsequently used\nfor the rest of the BEST primaries. Please make the appropriate arrangements\nnecessary to accomplish this. Quality should perform the appropriate\nanalytical tests on this operation. The tobacco will be approved before\nusage.\nThe reconstituted tobacco portions (EBR & CPCL) that will be used for these\nprimary operations must come from the following lot numbers:\nMA 0402 (EBR # Range 00835200 - 00836415)\nMA 0625 (CPCL # Range 00852595 - 00852710)\nTherefore, please make the necessary arrangements required to pull tobaccos\nfrom these specified lot numbers for regular production usage starting the\nweek of April 8, 1991.\nOnce the grade bins have been filled with the appropriate reconstituted\ntobacco, 1,500 1bs. of conditioned EBR and 500 1bs. of conditioned CPCL will\nbe \"caught off\". These tobaccos will be shipped to R&D Development Center by\nrefrigerated truck on April 10, 1991. Please supply the appropriate big pack\nboxes to accomplish this.\nThese primary operations will be run starting the week of April 8, 1991.\nExcess MT-768 D tobacco may be blended into any domestic non-menthol blend at\n58 or less\nExcess MT-778 tobacco may be blended into Richland and/or Amelia redried\nburleys at 18 or less.\nLabels that will be used to identify these tobaccos can be obtained from\nWayne Sanders, Macon Q.A.\nCharge all expenses to 02-327.\nShip all tobaccos to:\nB & W Tobacco Corporation\nDevelopment Center, Dock 10F\nLee & Mccloskey Streets\nLouisville, Kentucky\nAttn: B. A. Bandy\nR&D assistance will be provided in the manufacture of these tobacco products.\nIf there are any questions, please advise.\nT. E. B.\np3614\nAttachment\n583232682\nSource: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037\n\nQuestion: Where is the tobacco being shipped to?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B&W Tobacco Corporation, Development Center, Dock 10F, Lee & McCloskey Streets, Louisville , Kentucky",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
571
|
Where can be the labels used to identify these tobaccos obtained?
|
Wayne Sanders, Macon Q.A.
|
Page 2
- 2 -
The redried burley (MT-778) in this blend will be staged; therefore, it will
need to be run to the redried pack out bulker. It will be subsequently used
for the rest of the BEST primaries. Please make the appropriate arrangements
necessary to accomplish this. Quality should perform the appropriate
analytical tests on this operation. The tobacco will be approved before
usage.
The reconstituted tobacco portions (EBR & CPCL) that will be used for these
primary operations must come from the following lot numbers:
MA 0402 (EBR # Range 00835200 - 00836415)
MA 0625 (CPCL # Range 00852595 - 00852710)
Therefore, please make the necessary arrangements required to pull tobaccos
from these specified lot numbers for regular production usage starting the
week of April 8, 1991.
Once the grade bins have been filled with the appropriate reconstituted
tobacco, 1,500 1bs. of conditioned EBR and 500 1bs. of conditioned CPCL will
be "caught off". These tobaccos will be shipped to R&D Development Center by
refrigerated truck on April 10, 1991. Please supply the appropriate big pack
boxes to accomplish this.
These primary operations will be run starting the week of April 8, 1991.
Excess MT-768 D tobacco may be blended into any domestic non-menthol blend at
58 or less
Excess MT-778 tobacco may be blended into Richland and/or Amelia redried
burleys at 18 or less.
Labels that will be used to identify these tobaccos can be obtained from
Wayne Sanders, Macon Q.A.
Charge all expenses to 02-327.
Ship all tobaccos to:
B & W Tobacco Corporation
Development Center, Dock 10F
Lee & Mccloskey Streets
Louisville, Kentucky
Attn: B. A. Bandy
R&D assistance will be provided in the manufacture of these tobacco products.
If there are any questions, please advise.
T. E. B.
p3614
Attachment
583232682
Source: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 342,
"image": "lycj0037_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "lycj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 516
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\n- 2 -\nThe redried burley (MT-778) in this blend will be staged; therefore, it will\nneed to be run to the redried pack out bulker. It will be subsequently used\nfor the rest of the BEST primaries. Please make the appropriate arrangements\nnecessary to accomplish this. Quality should perform the appropriate\nanalytical tests on this operation. The tobacco will be approved before\nusage.\nThe reconstituted tobacco portions (EBR & CPCL) that will be used for these\nprimary operations must come from the following lot numbers:\nMA 0402 (EBR # Range 00835200 - 00836415)\nMA 0625 (CPCL # Range 00852595 - 00852710)\nTherefore, please make the necessary arrangements required to pull tobaccos\nfrom these specified lot numbers for regular production usage starting the\nweek of April 8, 1991.\nOnce the grade bins have been filled with the appropriate reconstituted\ntobacco, 1,500 1bs. of conditioned EBR and 500 1bs. of conditioned CPCL will\nbe \"caught off\". These tobaccos will be shipped to R&D Development Center by\nrefrigerated truck on April 10, 1991. Please supply the appropriate big pack\nboxes to accomplish this.\nThese primary operations will be run starting the week of April 8, 1991.\nExcess MT-768 D tobacco may be blended into any domestic non-menthol blend at\n58 or less\nExcess MT-778 tobacco may be blended into Richland and/or Amelia redried\nburleys at 18 or less.\nLabels that will be used to identify these tobaccos can be obtained from\nWayne Sanders, Macon Q.A.\nCharge all expenses to 02-327.\nShip all tobaccos to:\nB & W Tobacco Corporation\nDevelopment Center, Dock 10F\nLee & Mccloskey Streets\nLouisville, Kentucky\nAttn: B. A. Bandy\nR&D assistance will be provided in the manufacture of these tobacco products.\nIf there are any questions, please advise.\nT. E. B.\np3614\nAttachment\n583232682\nSource: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037\n\nQuestion: Where can be the labels used to identify these tobaccos obtained?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Wayne Sanders, Macon Q.A.",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
577
|
what is the CGR for the age group 21-25?
|
-0.68%
|
Page 1
Estimated Growth Rates for
Bow Selected Age Groups 1995-2000
Age
CGR
21-25
-0.68%
26-35
-1.82%
36-50
1.16%
. .. ..
314002830
51+
4.22%
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 346,
"image": "rzbj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rzbj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 105
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nEstimated Growth Rates for\nBow Selected Age Groups 1995-2000\nAge\nCGR\n21-25\n-0.68%\n26-35\n-1.82%\n36-50\n1.16%\n. .. ..\n314002830\n51+\n4.22%\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037\n\nQuestion: what is the CGR for the age group 21-25?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "-0.68%",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
578
|
which age group is having the highest estimated growth rate or CGR?
|
51+
|
Page 1
Estimated Growth Rates for
Bow Selected Age Groups 1995-2000
Age
CGR
21-25
-0.68%
26-35
-1.82%
36-50
1.16%
. .. ..
314002830
51+
4.22%
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 346,
"image": "rzbj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rzbj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 102
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nEstimated Growth Rates for\nBow Selected Age Groups 1995-2000\nAge\nCGR\n21-25\n-0.68%\n26-35\n-1.82%\n36-50\n1.16%\n. .. ..\n314002830\n51+\n4.22%\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037\n\nQuestion: which age group is having the highest estimated growth rate or CGR?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "51+",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
579
|
which age group is having the lowest estimated growth rate or CGR?
|
26-35
|
Page 1
Estimated Growth Rates for
Bow Selected Age Groups 1995-2000
Age
CGR
21-25
-0.68%
26-35
-1.82%
36-50
1.16%
. .. ..
314002830
51+
4.22%
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 346,
"image": "rzbj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rzbj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 103
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nEstimated Growth Rates for\nBow Selected Age Groups 1995-2000\nAge\nCGR\n21-25\n-0.68%\n26-35\n-1.82%\n36-50\n1.16%\n. .. ..\n314002830\n51+\n4.22%\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037\n\nQuestion: which age group is having the lowest estimated growth rate or CGR?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "26-35",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
580
|
Between which years estimated growth rates have been taken? ?\
|
1995-2000
|
Page 1
Estimated Growth Rates for
Bow Selected Age Groups 1995-2000
Age
CGR
21-25
-0.68%
26-35
-1.82%
36-50
1.16%
. .. ..
314002830
51+
4.22%
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 346,
"image": "rzbj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rzbj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 104
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nEstimated Growth Rates for\nBow Selected Age Groups 1995-2000\nAge\nCGR\n21-25\n-0.68%\n26-35\n-1.82%\n36-50\n1.16%\n. .. ..\n314002830\n51+\n4.22%\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037\n\nQuestion: Between which years estimated growth rates have been taken? ?\\",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1995-2000",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
586
|
which brands did camel exotic blends compliment?
|
the brand's Turkish and Domestic blend with rare tobaccos and flavorful spices
|
Page 3
The Exotic Blends - Camel's Specialty Products
.
Camel recently introduced Camel Exotic Blends, a new line of premium specialty
products available through CML and select bars within the Camel bar program
Camel Exotic Blends complement the brand's Turkish and domestic blend with rare
tobaccos and flavorful spices.
. The specialty blends are packaged in stylish tins with graphics that capture the
exotic feel, and premium quality and taste of Camel. Within each tin, inserts
describe the flavor of the blends, the heritage of Camel and what makes the unique
styles a pleasure to burn.
Samsun
Since 1913, Camel has traveled the exotic regions of Asia Minor to find the
world's smoothest, most aromatic Turkish tobaccos. Camel Samsun is a
premium cigarette that features an extremely delicate and fragrant Turkish leaf.
An exotic yet mellow flavor variation of Camel's unique Turkish and domestic
blend.
Twist
The smooth, aromatic flavor of Turkish tobaccos is complemented by the flavors
of exotic spices in this special version of Camel's Turkish and domestic blend. By
introducing a splash of citrus flavor to our unique blend, Camel Twist offers a
uniquely refreshing taste.
Crema
The smooth aromatic flavor of Turkish tobaccos is complemented by the flavors
of exotic spices in this special version of Camel's Turkish and domestic blend. By
introducing a hint of vanilla to our unique blend, Camel Crema delivers a creamy,
indulgent flavor that offers an intriguing and pleasurable smoking experience.
Rare
Since 1913, Camel has crossed continents in search of the finest leaf. We roll
the top 1 percent of these finest quality tobaccos to blend our own special
reserve, Camel Rare. This distinctive version of Camel's Turkish and domestic
blend offers a smoking experience that is extraordinarily smooth and mellow, yet
delightfully flavorful.
(Because Camel Rare is created from a limited resource of top tobacco leaf, the
brand is only able to produce a limited quantity of the brand style. Once Camel
Rare has sold out within CML and Camel bars, the brand must wait for the next
batch of top leaf to continue to manufacture, and replenish, the style.)
-more-
52522 2174
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/tynx0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 351,
"image": "tynx0037_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "tynx0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 524
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nThe Exotic Blends - Camel's Specialty Products\n.\nCamel recently introduced Camel Exotic Blends, a new line of premium specialty\nproducts available through CML and select bars within the Camel bar program\nCamel Exotic Blends complement the brand's Turkish and domestic blend with rare\ntobaccos and flavorful spices.\n. The specialty blends are packaged in stylish tins with graphics that capture the\nexotic feel, and premium quality and taste of Camel. Within each tin, inserts\ndescribe the flavor of the blends, the heritage of Camel and what makes the unique\nstyles a pleasure to burn.\nSamsun\nSince 1913, Camel has traveled the exotic regions of Asia Minor to find the\nworld's smoothest, most aromatic Turkish tobaccos. Camel Samsun is a\npremium cigarette that features an extremely delicate and fragrant Turkish leaf.\nAn exotic yet mellow flavor variation of Camel's unique Turkish and domestic\nblend.\nTwist\nThe smooth, aromatic flavor of Turkish tobaccos is complemented by the flavors\nof exotic spices in this special version of Camel's Turkish and domestic blend. By\nintroducing a splash of citrus flavor to our unique blend, Camel Twist offers a\nuniquely refreshing taste.\nCrema\nThe smooth aromatic flavor of Turkish tobaccos is complemented by the flavors\nof exotic spices in this special version of Camel's Turkish and domestic blend. By\nintroducing a hint of vanilla to our unique blend, Camel Crema delivers a creamy,\nindulgent flavor that offers an intriguing and pleasurable smoking experience.\nRare\nSince 1913, Camel has crossed continents in search of the finest leaf. We roll\nthe top 1 percent of these finest quality tobaccos to blend our own special\nreserve, Camel Rare. This distinctive version of Camel's Turkish and domestic\nblend offers a smoking experience that is extraordinarily smooth and mellow, yet\ndelightfully flavorful.\n(Because Camel Rare is created from a limited resource of top tobacco leaf, the\nbrand is only able to produce a limited quantity of the brand style. Once Camel\nRare has sold out within CML and Camel bars, the brand must wait for the next\nbatch of top leaf to continue to manufacture, and replenish, the style.)\n-more-\n52522 2174\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/tynx0037\n\nQuestion: which brands did camel exotic blends compliment?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "the brand's Turkish and Domestic blend with rare tobaccos and flavorful spices",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
588
|
what does camel crema deliver?
|
a creamy indulgent flavor that offers an intriguing and pleasurable smoking experience.
|
Page 3
The Exotic Blends - Camel's Specialty Products
.
Camel recently introduced Camel Exotic Blends, a new line of premium specialty
products available through CML and select bars within the Camel bar program
Camel Exotic Blends complement the brand's Turkish and domestic blend with rare
tobaccos and flavorful spices.
. The specialty blends are packaged in stylish tins with graphics that capture the
exotic feel, and premium quality and taste of Camel. Within each tin, inserts
describe the flavor of the blends, the heritage of Camel and what makes the unique
styles a pleasure to burn.
Samsun
Since 1913, Camel has traveled the exotic regions of Asia Minor to find the
world's smoothest, most aromatic Turkish tobaccos. Camel Samsun is a
premium cigarette that features an extremely delicate and fragrant Turkish leaf.
An exotic yet mellow flavor variation of Camel's unique Turkish and domestic
blend.
Twist
The smooth, aromatic flavor of Turkish tobaccos is complemented by the flavors
of exotic spices in this special version of Camel's Turkish and domestic blend. By
introducing a splash of citrus flavor to our unique blend, Camel Twist offers a
uniquely refreshing taste.
Crema
The smooth aromatic flavor of Turkish tobaccos is complemented by the flavors
of exotic spices in this special version of Camel's Turkish and domestic blend. By
introducing a hint of vanilla to our unique blend, Camel Crema delivers a creamy,
indulgent flavor that offers an intriguing and pleasurable smoking experience.
Rare
Since 1913, Camel has crossed continents in search of the finest leaf. We roll
the top 1 percent of these finest quality tobaccos to blend our own special
reserve, Camel Rare. This distinctive version of Camel's Turkish and domestic
blend offers a smoking experience that is extraordinarily smooth and mellow, yet
delightfully flavorful.
(Because Camel Rare is created from a limited resource of top tobacco leaf, the
brand is only able to produce a limited quantity of the brand style. Once Camel
Rare has sold out within CML and Camel bars, the brand must wait for the next
batch of top leaf to continue to manufacture, and replenish, the style.)
-more-
52522 2174
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/tynx0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 351,
"image": "tynx0037_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "tynx0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 523
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nThe Exotic Blends - Camel's Specialty Products\n.\nCamel recently introduced Camel Exotic Blends, a new line of premium specialty\nproducts available through CML and select bars within the Camel bar program\nCamel Exotic Blends complement the brand's Turkish and domestic blend with rare\ntobaccos and flavorful spices.\n. The specialty blends are packaged in stylish tins with graphics that capture the\nexotic feel, and premium quality and taste of Camel. Within each tin, inserts\ndescribe the flavor of the blends, the heritage of Camel and what makes the unique\nstyles a pleasure to burn.\nSamsun\nSince 1913, Camel has traveled the exotic regions of Asia Minor to find the\nworld's smoothest, most aromatic Turkish tobaccos. Camel Samsun is a\npremium cigarette that features an extremely delicate and fragrant Turkish leaf.\nAn exotic yet mellow flavor variation of Camel's unique Turkish and domestic\nblend.\nTwist\nThe smooth, aromatic flavor of Turkish tobaccos is complemented by the flavors\nof exotic spices in this special version of Camel's Turkish and domestic blend. By\nintroducing a splash of citrus flavor to our unique blend, Camel Twist offers a\nuniquely refreshing taste.\nCrema\nThe smooth aromatic flavor of Turkish tobaccos is complemented by the flavors\nof exotic spices in this special version of Camel's Turkish and domestic blend. By\nintroducing a hint of vanilla to our unique blend, Camel Crema delivers a creamy,\nindulgent flavor that offers an intriguing and pleasurable smoking experience.\nRare\nSince 1913, Camel has crossed continents in search of the finest leaf. We roll\nthe top 1 percent of these finest quality tobaccos to blend our own special\nreserve, Camel Rare. This distinctive version of Camel's Turkish and domestic\nblend offers a smoking experience that is extraordinarily smooth and mellow, yet\ndelightfully flavorful.\n(Because Camel Rare is created from a limited resource of top tobacco leaf, the\nbrand is only able to produce a limited quantity of the brand style. Once Camel\nRare has sold out within CML and Camel bars, the brand must wait for the next\nbatch of top leaf to continue to manufacture, and replenish, the style.)\n-more-\n52522 2174\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/tynx0037\n\nQuestion: what does camel crema deliver?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "a creamy indulgent flavor that offers an intriguing and pleasurable smoking experience.",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
590
|
How are speciality blends packed?
|
stylish tins with graphics
|
Page 3
The Exotic Blends - Camel's Specialty Products
.
Camel recently introduced Camel Exotic Blends, a new line of premium specialty
products available through CML and select bars within the Camel bar program
Camel Exotic Blends complement the brand's Turkish and domestic blend with rare
tobaccos and flavorful spices.
. The specialty blends are packaged in stylish tins with graphics that capture the
exotic feel, and premium quality and taste of Camel. Within each tin, inserts
describe the flavor of the blends, the heritage of Camel and what makes the unique
styles a pleasure to burn.
Samsun
Since 1913, Camel has traveled the exotic regions of Asia Minor to find the
world's smoothest, most aromatic Turkish tobaccos. Camel Samsun is a
premium cigarette that features an extremely delicate and fragrant Turkish leaf.
An exotic yet mellow flavor variation of Camel's unique Turkish and domestic
blend.
Twist
The smooth, aromatic flavor of Turkish tobaccos is complemented by the flavors
of exotic spices in this special version of Camel's Turkish and domestic blend. By
introducing a splash of citrus flavor to our unique blend, Camel Twist offers a
uniquely refreshing taste.
Crema
The smooth aromatic flavor of Turkish tobaccos is complemented by the flavors
of exotic spices in this special version of Camel's Turkish and domestic blend. By
introducing a hint of vanilla to our unique blend, Camel Crema delivers a creamy,
indulgent flavor that offers an intriguing and pleasurable smoking experience.
Rare
Since 1913, Camel has crossed continents in search of the finest leaf. We roll
the top 1 percent of these finest quality tobaccos to blend our own special
reserve, Camel Rare. This distinctive version of Camel's Turkish and domestic
blend offers a smoking experience that is extraordinarily smooth and mellow, yet
delightfully flavorful.
(Because Camel Rare is created from a limited resource of top tobacco leaf, the
brand is only able to produce a limited quantity of the brand style. Once Camel
Rare has sold out within CML and Camel bars, the brand must wait for the next
batch of top leaf to continue to manufacture, and replenish, the style.)
-more-
52522 2174
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/tynx0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 351,
"image": "tynx0037_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "tynx0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 514
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nThe Exotic Blends - Camel's Specialty Products\n.\nCamel recently introduced Camel Exotic Blends, a new line of premium specialty\nproducts available through CML and select bars within the Camel bar program\nCamel Exotic Blends complement the brand's Turkish and domestic blend with rare\ntobaccos and flavorful spices.\n. The specialty blends are packaged in stylish tins with graphics that capture the\nexotic feel, and premium quality and taste of Camel. Within each tin, inserts\ndescribe the flavor of the blends, the heritage of Camel and what makes the unique\nstyles a pleasure to burn.\nSamsun\nSince 1913, Camel has traveled the exotic regions of Asia Minor to find the\nworld's smoothest, most aromatic Turkish tobaccos. Camel Samsun is a\npremium cigarette that features an extremely delicate and fragrant Turkish leaf.\nAn exotic yet mellow flavor variation of Camel's unique Turkish and domestic\nblend.\nTwist\nThe smooth, aromatic flavor of Turkish tobaccos is complemented by the flavors\nof exotic spices in this special version of Camel's Turkish and domestic blend. By\nintroducing a splash of citrus flavor to our unique blend, Camel Twist offers a\nuniquely refreshing taste.\nCrema\nThe smooth aromatic flavor of Turkish tobaccos is complemented by the flavors\nof exotic spices in this special version of Camel's Turkish and domestic blend. By\nintroducing a hint of vanilla to our unique blend, Camel Crema delivers a creamy,\nindulgent flavor that offers an intriguing and pleasurable smoking experience.\nRare\nSince 1913, Camel has crossed continents in search of the finest leaf. We roll\nthe top 1 percent of these finest quality tobaccos to blend our own special\nreserve, Camel Rare. This distinctive version of Camel's Turkish and domestic\nblend offers a smoking experience that is extraordinarily smooth and mellow, yet\ndelightfully flavorful.\n(Because Camel Rare is created from a limited resource of top tobacco leaf, the\nbrand is only able to produce a limited quantity of the brand style. Once Camel\nRare has sold out within CML and Camel bars, the brand must wait for the next\nbatch of top leaf to continue to manufacture, and replenish, the style.)\n-more-\n52522 2174\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/tynx0037\n\nQuestion: How are speciality blends packed?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "stylish tins with graphics",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
605
|
What is the date mentioned?
|
September 20, 1985
|
Page 1
PEPSI-COLA U.S.A
PEPS
PURCHASE . NEW YORK 10577
USA
September 20, 1985
Ms. Linda Goldstein
Center for Science in the Public Interest
1501 Sixteenth St. , NW
Washington, DC 20036
Dear Ms. Goldstein:
Thank you for your recent letter to Pepsi-Cola requesting
information about our products.
A complete listing of the ingredients in our Pepsi products appears
on each package. In answer to your question regarding the
nutritional breakdown of our carbonated beverages, we are enclosing
a Product Ingredient Brochure. Please note that the amounts of
sodium, potassium and calcium depend on the local water supply.
Our independently owned and operated Pepsi-Cola franchise bottlers
have the choice of using one of the sweeteners authorized for use by
the Pepsi-Cola system. The bottlers primarily use sucrose and high
fructose corn syrup.
The sweetener used in Pepsi-Cola determines its exact caloric
content. When sweetened with sucrose, Pepsi-Cola has 13.1 calories
per ounce, or 157 calories in a 12-ounce can. When sweetened with
high fructose corn syrup, it contains 13.3 calories per ounce, for a
total of 160 calories per 12-ounce serving.
The caloric content indicated in the enclosed brochure is for
Pepsi-Cola sweetened with sucrose. This calculation is based on the
standard multiplier of 3.8 calories per gram of carbohydrate.
We appreciate your interest in Pepsi-Cola Company and its products
and hope this information has been helpful to you.
Sincerely,
anita Fancotto
Anita Pancotto
Consumer Correspondent
Enclosure
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xjpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 360,
"image": "xjpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "xjpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 398
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPEPSI-COLA U.S.A\nPEPS\nPURCHASE . NEW YORK 10577\nUSA\nSeptember 20, 1985\nMs. Linda Goldstein\nCenter for Science in the Public Interest\n1501 Sixteenth St. , NW\nWashington, DC 20036\nDear Ms. Goldstein:\nThank you for your recent letter to Pepsi-Cola requesting\ninformation about our products.\nA complete listing of the ingredients in our Pepsi products appears\non each package. In answer to your question regarding the\nnutritional breakdown of our carbonated beverages, we are enclosing\na Product Ingredient Brochure. Please note that the amounts of\nsodium, potassium and calcium depend on the local water supply.\nOur independently owned and operated Pepsi-Cola franchise bottlers\nhave the choice of using one of the sweeteners authorized for use by\nthe Pepsi-Cola system. The bottlers primarily use sucrose and high\nfructose corn syrup.\nThe sweetener used in Pepsi-Cola determines its exact caloric\ncontent. When sweetened with sucrose, Pepsi-Cola has 13.1 calories\nper ounce, or 157 calories in a 12-ounce can. When sweetened with\nhigh fructose corn syrup, it contains 13.3 calories per ounce, for a\ntotal of 160 calories per 12-ounce serving.\nThe caloric content indicated in the enclosed brochure is for\nPepsi-Cola sweetened with sucrose. This calculation is based on the\nstandard multiplier of 3.8 calories per gram of carbohydrate.\nWe appreciate your interest in Pepsi-Cola Company and its products\nand hope this information has been helpful to you.\nSincerely,\nanita Fancotto\nAnita Pancotto\nConsumer Correspondent\nEnclosure\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xjpj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the date mentioned?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "September 20, 1985",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
607
|
To whom is this letter addressed?
|
Ms. Goldstein
|
Page 1
PEPSI-COLA U.S.A
PEPS
PURCHASE . NEW YORK 10577
USA
September 20, 1985
Ms. Linda Goldstein
Center for Science in the Public Interest
1501 Sixteenth St. , NW
Washington, DC 20036
Dear Ms. Goldstein:
Thank you for your recent letter to Pepsi-Cola requesting
information about our products.
A complete listing of the ingredients in our Pepsi products appears
on each package. In answer to your question regarding the
nutritional breakdown of our carbonated beverages, we are enclosing
a Product Ingredient Brochure. Please note that the amounts of
sodium, potassium and calcium depend on the local water supply.
Our independently owned and operated Pepsi-Cola franchise bottlers
have the choice of using one of the sweeteners authorized for use by
the Pepsi-Cola system. The bottlers primarily use sucrose and high
fructose corn syrup.
The sweetener used in Pepsi-Cola determines its exact caloric
content. When sweetened with sucrose, Pepsi-Cola has 13.1 calories
per ounce, or 157 calories in a 12-ounce can. When sweetened with
high fructose corn syrup, it contains 13.3 calories per ounce, for a
total of 160 calories per 12-ounce serving.
The caloric content indicated in the enclosed brochure is for
Pepsi-Cola sweetened with sucrose. This calculation is based on the
standard multiplier of 3.8 calories per gram of carbohydrate.
We appreciate your interest in Pepsi-Cola Company and its products
and hope this information has been helpful to you.
Sincerely,
anita Fancotto
Anita Pancotto
Consumer Correspondent
Enclosure
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xjpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 360,
"image": "xjpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "xjpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 396
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPEPSI-COLA U.S.A\nPEPS\nPURCHASE . NEW YORK 10577\nUSA\nSeptember 20, 1985\nMs. Linda Goldstein\nCenter for Science in the Public Interest\n1501 Sixteenth St. , NW\nWashington, DC 20036\nDear Ms. Goldstein:\nThank you for your recent letter to Pepsi-Cola requesting\ninformation about our products.\nA complete listing of the ingredients in our Pepsi products appears\non each package. In answer to your question regarding the\nnutritional breakdown of our carbonated beverages, we are enclosing\na Product Ingredient Brochure. Please note that the amounts of\nsodium, potassium and calcium depend on the local water supply.\nOur independently owned and operated Pepsi-Cola franchise bottlers\nhave the choice of using one of the sweeteners authorized for use by\nthe Pepsi-Cola system. The bottlers primarily use sucrose and high\nfructose corn syrup.\nThe sweetener used in Pepsi-Cola determines its exact caloric\ncontent. When sweetened with sucrose, Pepsi-Cola has 13.1 calories\nper ounce, or 157 calories in a 12-ounce can. When sweetened with\nhigh fructose corn syrup, it contains 13.3 calories per ounce, for a\ntotal of 160 calories per 12-ounce serving.\nThe caloric content indicated in the enclosed brochure is for\nPepsi-Cola sweetened with sucrose. This calculation is based on the\nstandard multiplier of 3.8 calories per gram of carbohydrate.\nWe appreciate your interest in Pepsi-Cola Company and its products\nand hope this information has been helpful to you.\nSincerely,\nanita Fancotto\nAnita Pancotto\nConsumer Correspondent\nEnclosure\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xjpj0226\n\nQuestion: To whom is this letter addressed?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Ms. Goldstein",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
608
|
The amounts of which elements depend on the local water supply?
|
Sodium, Potassium and Calcium
|
Page 1
PEPSI-COLA U.S.A
PEPS
PURCHASE . NEW YORK 10577
USA
September 20, 1985
Ms. Linda Goldstein
Center for Science in the Public Interest
1501 Sixteenth St. , NW
Washington, DC 20036
Dear Ms. Goldstein:
Thank you for your recent letter to Pepsi-Cola requesting
information about our products.
A complete listing of the ingredients in our Pepsi products appears
on each package. In answer to your question regarding the
nutritional breakdown of our carbonated beverages, we are enclosing
a Product Ingredient Brochure. Please note that the amounts of
sodium, potassium and calcium depend on the local water supply.
Our independently owned and operated Pepsi-Cola franchise bottlers
have the choice of using one of the sweeteners authorized for use by
the Pepsi-Cola system. The bottlers primarily use sucrose and high
fructose corn syrup.
The sweetener used in Pepsi-Cola determines its exact caloric
content. When sweetened with sucrose, Pepsi-Cola has 13.1 calories
per ounce, or 157 calories in a 12-ounce can. When sweetened with
high fructose corn syrup, it contains 13.3 calories per ounce, for a
total of 160 calories per 12-ounce serving.
The caloric content indicated in the enclosed brochure is for
Pepsi-Cola sweetened with sucrose. This calculation is based on the
standard multiplier of 3.8 calories per gram of carbohydrate.
We appreciate your interest in Pepsi-Cola Company and its products
and hope this information has been helpful to you.
Sincerely,
anita Fancotto
Anita Pancotto
Consumer Correspondent
Enclosure
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xjpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 360,
"image": "xjpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "xjpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 404
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPEPSI-COLA U.S.A\nPEPS\nPURCHASE . NEW YORK 10577\nUSA\nSeptember 20, 1985\nMs. Linda Goldstein\nCenter for Science in the Public Interest\n1501 Sixteenth St. , NW\nWashington, DC 20036\nDear Ms. Goldstein:\nThank you for your recent letter to Pepsi-Cola requesting\ninformation about our products.\nA complete listing of the ingredients in our Pepsi products appears\non each package. In answer to your question regarding the\nnutritional breakdown of our carbonated beverages, we are enclosing\na Product Ingredient Brochure. Please note that the amounts of\nsodium, potassium and calcium depend on the local water supply.\nOur independently owned and operated Pepsi-Cola franchise bottlers\nhave the choice of using one of the sweeteners authorized for use by\nthe Pepsi-Cola system. The bottlers primarily use sucrose and high\nfructose corn syrup.\nThe sweetener used in Pepsi-Cola determines its exact caloric\ncontent. When sweetened with sucrose, Pepsi-Cola has 13.1 calories\nper ounce, or 157 calories in a 12-ounce can. When sweetened with\nhigh fructose corn syrup, it contains 13.3 calories per ounce, for a\ntotal of 160 calories per 12-ounce serving.\nThe caloric content indicated in the enclosed brochure is for\nPepsi-Cola sweetened with sucrose. This calculation is based on the\nstandard multiplier of 3.8 calories per gram of carbohydrate.\nWe appreciate your interest in Pepsi-Cola Company and its products\nand hope this information has been helpful to you.\nSincerely,\nanita Fancotto\nAnita Pancotto\nConsumer Correspondent\nEnclosure\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xjpj0226\n\nQuestion: The amounts of which elements depend on the local water supply?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Sodium, Potassium and Calcium",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
609
|
Where does the complete listing of ingredients in Pepsi products appear?
|
on each package.
|
Page 1
PEPSI-COLA U.S.A
PEPS
PURCHASE . NEW YORK 10577
USA
September 20, 1985
Ms. Linda Goldstein
Center for Science in the Public Interest
1501 Sixteenth St. , NW
Washington, DC 20036
Dear Ms. Goldstein:
Thank you for your recent letter to Pepsi-Cola requesting
information about our products.
A complete listing of the ingredients in our Pepsi products appears
on each package. In answer to your question regarding the
nutritional breakdown of our carbonated beverages, we are enclosing
a Product Ingredient Brochure. Please note that the amounts of
sodium, potassium and calcium depend on the local water supply.
Our independently owned and operated Pepsi-Cola franchise bottlers
have the choice of using one of the sweeteners authorized for use by
the Pepsi-Cola system. The bottlers primarily use sucrose and high
fructose corn syrup.
The sweetener used in Pepsi-Cola determines its exact caloric
content. When sweetened with sucrose, Pepsi-Cola has 13.1 calories
per ounce, or 157 calories in a 12-ounce can. When sweetened with
high fructose corn syrup, it contains 13.3 calories per ounce, for a
total of 160 calories per 12-ounce serving.
The caloric content indicated in the enclosed brochure is for
Pepsi-Cola sweetened with sucrose. This calculation is based on the
standard multiplier of 3.8 calories per gram of carbohydrate.
We appreciate your interest in Pepsi-Cola Company and its products
and hope this information has been helpful to you.
Sincerely,
anita Fancotto
Anita Pancotto
Consumer Correspondent
Enclosure
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xjpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 360,
"image": "xjpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "xjpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 401
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPEPSI-COLA U.S.A\nPEPS\nPURCHASE . NEW YORK 10577\nUSA\nSeptember 20, 1985\nMs. Linda Goldstein\nCenter for Science in the Public Interest\n1501 Sixteenth St. , NW\nWashington, DC 20036\nDear Ms. Goldstein:\nThank you for your recent letter to Pepsi-Cola requesting\ninformation about our products.\nA complete listing of the ingredients in our Pepsi products appears\non each package. In answer to your question regarding the\nnutritional breakdown of our carbonated beverages, we are enclosing\na Product Ingredient Brochure. Please note that the amounts of\nsodium, potassium and calcium depend on the local water supply.\nOur independently owned and operated Pepsi-Cola franchise bottlers\nhave the choice of using one of the sweeteners authorized for use by\nthe Pepsi-Cola system. The bottlers primarily use sucrose and high\nfructose corn syrup.\nThe sweetener used in Pepsi-Cola determines its exact caloric\ncontent. When sweetened with sucrose, Pepsi-Cola has 13.1 calories\nper ounce, or 157 calories in a 12-ounce can. When sweetened with\nhigh fructose corn syrup, it contains 13.3 calories per ounce, for a\ntotal of 160 calories per 12-ounce serving.\nThe caloric content indicated in the enclosed brochure is for\nPepsi-Cola sweetened with sucrose. This calculation is based on the\nstandard multiplier of 3.8 calories per gram of carbohydrate.\nWe appreciate your interest in Pepsi-Cola Company and its products\nand hope this information has been helpful to you.\nSincerely,\nanita Fancotto\nAnita Pancotto\nConsumer Correspondent\nEnclosure\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xjpj0226\n\nQuestion: Where does the complete listing of ingredients in Pepsi products appear?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "on each package.",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
614
|
What is the word written in bold black in the first picture?
|
Coke
|
Page 1
ConGUIDE
Informatic
-800
1800
GET
GET
CokeB
coke
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 362,
"image": "mtyj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mtyj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 65
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nConGUIDE\nInformatic\n-800\n1800\nGET\nGET\nCokeB\ncoke\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the word written in bold black in the first picture?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Coke",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
617
|
What is the name of the beverages company?
|
Shasta
|
Page 10
Shasta
BEVERAGES
A CONSOLIDATED FOODS COMPANY . RESPONSIVE TO CONSUMER NEEDS
EXECUTIVE OFFICES
SHASTA'S NEW NUTRITIVE SWEETENER
FRUCTOSE 55
HIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SWEETENER
FRUCTOSE 55 IS A NEW SECOND GENERATION HIGH FRUCTOSE SYRUP. ITS HIGH
SWEETNESS VALUE MAKES IT DESIRABLE AS A TOTAL REPLACEMENT FOR ORDINARY
REFINED SUGAR IN ALL REGULAR SHASTA PRODUCTS.
CHARACTERISTICS :
APPEARANCE
WATER-WHITE
TASTE
CLEAN SWEET
RELATIVE SWEETNESS
SWEETER THAN SUGAR
CARBOHYDRATE COMPOSITION (DRY BASIS ) :
FRUCTOSE - %
55
DEXTROSE (GLUCOSE ) - %
42
SUGAR ( SUCROSE ) - %
0
HIGHER SACCHARIDES -
3
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS CORRECT TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :
Cecil B. Lowry
Vice President, Science/Technology
26901 Industrial Boulevard
Hayward, California 94545
JULY , 1979
26905 INDOSTRATBOULEVARDin CHAYWARD CALIFORNIA 92543 du/LEPHONE Rios, 283-3200
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 363,
"image": "ykpj0226_10.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "ykpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "10"
}
| 323
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 10\nShasta\nBEVERAGES\nA CONSOLIDATED FOODS COMPANY . RESPONSIVE TO CONSUMER NEEDS\nEXECUTIVE OFFICES\nSHASTA'S NEW NUTRITIVE SWEETENER\nFRUCTOSE 55\nHIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SWEETENER\nFRUCTOSE 55 IS A NEW SECOND GENERATION HIGH FRUCTOSE SYRUP. ITS HIGH\nSWEETNESS VALUE MAKES IT DESIRABLE AS A TOTAL REPLACEMENT FOR ORDINARY\nREFINED SUGAR IN ALL REGULAR SHASTA PRODUCTS.\nCHARACTERISTICS :\nAPPEARANCE\nWATER-WHITE\nTASTE\nCLEAN SWEET\nRELATIVE SWEETNESS\nSWEETER THAN SUGAR\nCARBOHYDRATE COMPOSITION (DRY BASIS ) :\nFRUCTOSE - %\n55\nDEXTROSE (GLUCOSE ) - %\n42\nSUGAR ( SUCROSE ) - %\n0\nHIGHER SACCHARIDES -\n3\nTHE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS CORRECT TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE.\nFOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :\nCecil B. Lowry\nVice President, Science/Technology\n26901 Industrial Boulevard\nHayward, California 94545\nJULY , 1979\n26905 INDOSTRATBOULEVARDin CHAYWARD CALIFORNIA 92543 du/LEPHONE Rios, 283-3200\n\nQuestion: What is the name of the beverages company?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Shasta",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
618
|
Which is the new second generation high fructose syrup?
|
FRUCTOSE 55
|
Page 10
Shasta
BEVERAGES
A CONSOLIDATED FOODS COMPANY . RESPONSIVE TO CONSUMER NEEDS
EXECUTIVE OFFICES
SHASTA'S NEW NUTRITIVE SWEETENER
FRUCTOSE 55
HIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SWEETENER
FRUCTOSE 55 IS A NEW SECOND GENERATION HIGH FRUCTOSE SYRUP. ITS HIGH
SWEETNESS VALUE MAKES IT DESIRABLE AS A TOTAL REPLACEMENT FOR ORDINARY
REFINED SUGAR IN ALL REGULAR SHASTA PRODUCTS.
CHARACTERISTICS :
APPEARANCE
WATER-WHITE
TASTE
CLEAN SWEET
RELATIVE SWEETNESS
SWEETER THAN SUGAR
CARBOHYDRATE COMPOSITION (DRY BASIS ) :
FRUCTOSE - %
55
DEXTROSE (GLUCOSE ) - %
42
SUGAR ( SUCROSE ) - %
0
HIGHER SACCHARIDES -
3
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS CORRECT TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :
Cecil B. Lowry
Vice President, Science/Technology
26901 Industrial Boulevard
Hayward, California 94545
JULY , 1979
26905 INDOSTRATBOULEVARDin CHAYWARD CALIFORNIA 92543 du/LEPHONE Rios, 283-3200
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 363,
"image": "ykpj0226_10.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "ykpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "10"
}
| 328
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 10\nShasta\nBEVERAGES\nA CONSOLIDATED FOODS COMPANY . RESPONSIVE TO CONSUMER NEEDS\nEXECUTIVE OFFICES\nSHASTA'S NEW NUTRITIVE SWEETENER\nFRUCTOSE 55\nHIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SWEETENER\nFRUCTOSE 55 IS A NEW SECOND GENERATION HIGH FRUCTOSE SYRUP. ITS HIGH\nSWEETNESS VALUE MAKES IT DESIRABLE AS A TOTAL REPLACEMENT FOR ORDINARY\nREFINED SUGAR IN ALL REGULAR SHASTA PRODUCTS.\nCHARACTERISTICS :\nAPPEARANCE\nWATER-WHITE\nTASTE\nCLEAN SWEET\nRELATIVE SWEETNESS\nSWEETER THAN SUGAR\nCARBOHYDRATE COMPOSITION (DRY BASIS ) :\nFRUCTOSE - %\n55\nDEXTROSE (GLUCOSE ) - %\n42\nSUGAR ( SUCROSE ) - %\n0\nHIGHER SACCHARIDES -\n3\nTHE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS CORRECT TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE.\nFOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :\nCecil B. Lowry\nVice President, Science/Technology\n26901 Industrial Boulevard\nHayward, California 94545\nJULY , 1979\n26905 INDOSTRATBOULEVARDin CHAYWARD CALIFORNIA 92543 du/LEPHONE Rios, 283-3200\n\nQuestion: Which is the new second generation high fructose syrup?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "FRUCTOSE 55",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
619
|
What is the date mentioned?
|
July, 1979
|
Page 10
Shasta
BEVERAGES
A CONSOLIDATED FOODS COMPANY . RESPONSIVE TO CONSUMER NEEDS
EXECUTIVE OFFICES
SHASTA'S NEW NUTRITIVE SWEETENER
FRUCTOSE 55
HIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SWEETENER
FRUCTOSE 55 IS A NEW SECOND GENERATION HIGH FRUCTOSE SYRUP. ITS HIGH
SWEETNESS VALUE MAKES IT DESIRABLE AS A TOTAL REPLACEMENT FOR ORDINARY
REFINED SUGAR IN ALL REGULAR SHASTA PRODUCTS.
CHARACTERISTICS :
APPEARANCE
WATER-WHITE
TASTE
CLEAN SWEET
RELATIVE SWEETNESS
SWEETER THAN SUGAR
CARBOHYDRATE COMPOSITION (DRY BASIS ) :
FRUCTOSE - %
55
DEXTROSE (GLUCOSE ) - %
42
SUGAR ( SUCROSE ) - %
0
HIGHER SACCHARIDES -
3
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS CORRECT TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :
Cecil B. Lowry
Vice President, Science/Technology
26901 Industrial Boulevard
Hayward, California 94545
JULY , 1979
26905 INDOSTRATBOULEVARDin CHAYWARD CALIFORNIA 92543 du/LEPHONE Rios, 283-3200
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 363,
"image": "ykpj0226_10.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "ykpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "10"
}
| 323
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 10\nShasta\nBEVERAGES\nA CONSOLIDATED FOODS COMPANY . RESPONSIVE TO CONSUMER NEEDS\nEXECUTIVE OFFICES\nSHASTA'S NEW NUTRITIVE SWEETENER\nFRUCTOSE 55\nHIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SWEETENER\nFRUCTOSE 55 IS A NEW SECOND GENERATION HIGH FRUCTOSE SYRUP. ITS HIGH\nSWEETNESS VALUE MAKES IT DESIRABLE AS A TOTAL REPLACEMENT FOR ORDINARY\nREFINED SUGAR IN ALL REGULAR SHASTA PRODUCTS.\nCHARACTERISTICS :\nAPPEARANCE\nWATER-WHITE\nTASTE\nCLEAN SWEET\nRELATIVE SWEETNESS\nSWEETER THAN SUGAR\nCARBOHYDRATE COMPOSITION (DRY BASIS ) :\nFRUCTOSE - %\n55\nDEXTROSE (GLUCOSE ) - %\n42\nSUGAR ( SUCROSE ) - %\n0\nHIGHER SACCHARIDES -\n3\nTHE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS CORRECT TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE.\nFOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :\nCecil B. Lowry\nVice President, Science/Technology\n26901 Industrial Boulevard\nHayward, California 94545\nJULY , 1979\n26905 INDOSTRATBOULEVARDin CHAYWARD CALIFORNIA 92543 du/LEPHONE Rios, 283-3200\n\nQuestion: What is the date mentioned?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "July, 1979",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
621
|
What is the DEXTROSE (GLUCOSE) level?
|
42
|
Page 10
Shasta
BEVERAGES
A CONSOLIDATED FOODS COMPANY . RESPONSIVE TO CONSUMER NEEDS
EXECUTIVE OFFICES
SHASTA'S NEW NUTRITIVE SWEETENER
FRUCTOSE 55
HIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SWEETENER
FRUCTOSE 55 IS A NEW SECOND GENERATION HIGH FRUCTOSE SYRUP. ITS HIGH
SWEETNESS VALUE MAKES IT DESIRABLE AS A TOTAL REPLACEMENT FOR ORDINARY
REFINED SUGAR IN ALL REGULAR SHASTA PRODUCTS.
CHARACTERISTICS :
APPEARANCE
WATER-WHITE
TASTE
CLEAN SWEET
RELATIVE SWEETNESS
SWEETER THAN SUGAR
CARBOHYDRATE COMPOSITION (DRY BASIS ) :
FRUCTOSE - %
55
DEXTROSE (GLUCOSE ) - %
42
SUGAR ( SUCROSE ) - %
0
HIGHER SACCHARIDES -
3
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS CORRECT TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :
Cecil B. Lowry
Vice President, Science/Technology
26901 Industrial Boulevard
Hayward, California 94545
JULY , 1979
26905 INDOSTRATBOULEVARDin CHAYWARD CALIFORNIA 92543 du/LEPHONE Rios, 283-3200
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 363,
"image": "ykpj0226_10.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "ykpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "10"
}
| 327
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 10\nShasta\nBEVERAGES\nA CONSOLIDATED FOODS COMPANY . RESPONSIVE TO CONSUMER NEEDS\nEXECUTIVE OFFICES\nSHASTA'S NEW NUTRITIVE SWEETENER\nFRUCTOSE 55\nHIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SWEETENER\nFRUCTOSE 55 IS A NEW SECOND GENERATION HIGH FRUCTOSE SYRUP. ITS HIGH\nSWEETNESS VALUE MAKES IT DESIRABLE AS A TOTAL REPLACEMENT FOR ORDINARY\nREFINED SUGAR IN ALL REGULAR SHASTA PRODUCTS.\nCHARACTERISTICS :\nAPPEARANCE\nWATER-WHITE\nTASTE\nCLEAN SWEET\nRELATIVE SWEETNESS\nSWEETER THAN SUGAR\nCARBOHYDRATE COMPOSITION (DRY BASIS ) :\nFRUCTOSE - %\n55\nDEXTROSE (GLUCOSE ) - %\n42\nSUGAR ( SUCROSE ) - %\n0\nHIGHER SACCHARIDES -\n3\nTHE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS CORRECT TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE.\nFOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :\nCecil B. Lowry\nVice President, Science/Technology\n26901 Industrial Boulevard\nHayward, California 94545\nJULY , 1979\n26905 INDOSTRATBOULEVARDin CHAYWARD CALIFORNIA 92543 du/LEPHONE Rios, 283-3200\n\nQuestion: What is the DEXTROSE (GLUCOSE) level?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "42",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
624
|
What is the date mentioned in the header of the document?
|
10/19/2016
|
Page 2
10/19/2016
Hacked emails show how Coca-cola fights the soda tax at local and global levels - MarketWatch
unprecedented action to reduce calories and sugar from beverages in the American diet - particularly in areas with
the highest rates of obesity in the country."
Related: 10 things Coke, Pepsi and the soda industry won't say
PepsiCo's 2025 goals, announced Monday, do move the needle forward. It plans to have two-thirds of its global
beverage volume contain 100 or less calories from added sugar per serving - a standard that less than 40% of its
current volume meets - along with goals for saturated fat and sodium.
Read: PepsiCo sets goal to reduce sugar and saturated fat in its products by 2025
PepsiCo, some analysts say, has been the beverage giant already setting the nutritional standard in its industry.
Gatorade, one of the company's more popular products, already has 100 or less calories from added sugar per
serving, Nestle noted
CSPI president Michael Jacobson offered PepsiCo a "kudos" for setting specific nutritional goals, and saying he)
(hoped others would follow its example.)
Coca-cola referred MarketWatch to its partnerships with various health initiatives and ongoing efforts to reformulate
drinks and make them smaller.
But these companies still have a responsibility for the global obesity and diabetics epidemics, O'Hara said.)
"Soda is sugar water. It's water with sugar. And there is no good excuse for that being the default beverage, and
that's what industry has done over the last several decades," he said. "That has had very bad health consequences
for the nation and the globe."
Read excerpts from the leaked Coca-cola emails below.
On unfriendly dietary guidelines and a coverage 'balance':
A report for the 2015 Dietary Guidelines, which included measures to decrease sugar-sweetened beverage
consumption, "far exceed the scope" of the advisory committee's role, said an alleged email written by Katherine
Loatman, the executive director of industry group International Council of Beverages Associations, and forwarded to
Coca Cola executives.
(Some of those measures, including removing full-calorie drinks from U.S. schools, Coca-cola told MarketWatch it
has completed).
"In terms of process, there is an opportunity for review and modification from the U.S. federal government before the
Guidelines are finalized. However, we should be prepared for this report to be cited frequently by activists, and work
together to balance coverage," the email said.
On fighting soda taxes:
Coca-cola targeted two Connecticut legislative proposals for taxes on sugary beverages, along with a West Virginia
bill, according to the leaked emails.
"We are working with coalition partners to ensure the [Connecticut] bills do not advance," reads an alleged February
2016 email from Jennifer Lemming, a member
member of the company's Government Relations team.
Moreover, "coalition-building work is underway in the California cities of San Francisco, Richmond, Oakland and
Watsonville in preparation for potential beverage tax ballot measures in June or November 2016," the email
continues.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/hacked-emails-show-how-coca-cola-fights-the-soda-tax-at-local-and-global-levels-2016-10-18/print
2/4
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nxpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 365,
"image": "nxpj0226_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "nxpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 747
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\n10/19/2016\nHacked emails show how Coca-cola fights the soda tax at local and global levels - MarketWatch\nunprecedented action to reduce calories and sugar from beverages in the American diet - particularly in areas with\nthe highest rates of obesity in the country.\"\nRelated: 10 things Coke, Pepsi and the soda industry won't say\nPepsiCo's 2025 goals, announced Monday, do move the needle forward. It plans to have two-thirds of its global\nbeverage volume contain 100 or less calories from added sugar per serving - a standard that less than 40% of its\ncurrent volume meets - along with goals for saturated fat and sodium.\nRead: PepsiCo sets goal to reduce sugar and saturated fat in its products by 2025\nPepsiCo, some analysts say, has been the beverage giant already setting the nutritional standard in its industry.\nGatorade, one of the company's more popular products, already has 100 or less calories from added sugar per\nserving, Nestle noted\nCSPI president Michael Jacobson offered PepsiCo a \"kudos\" for setting specific nutritional goals, and saying he)\n(hoped others would follow its example.)\nCoca-cola referred MarketWatch to its partnerships with various health initiatives and ongoing efforts to reformulate\ndrinks and make them smaller.\nBut these companies still have a responsibility for the global obesity and diabetics epidemics, O'Hara said.)\n\"Soda is sugar water. It's water with sugar. And there is no good excuse for that being the default beverage, and\nthat's what industry has done over the last several decades,\" he said. \"That has had very bad health consequences\nfor the nation and the globe.\"\nRead excerpts from the leaked Coca-cola emails below.\nOn unfriendly dietary guidelines and a coverage 'balance':\nA report for the 2015 Dietary Guidelines, which included measures to decrease sugar-sweetened beverage\nconsumption, \"far exceed the scope\" of the advisory committee's role, said an alleged email written by Katherine\nLoatman, the executive director of industry group International Council of Beverages Associations, and forwarded to\nCoca Cola executives.\n(Some of those measures, including removing full-calorie drinks from U.S. schools, Coca-cola told MarketWatch it\nhas completed).\n\"In terms of process, there is an opportunity for review and modification from the U.S. federal government before the\nGuidelines are finalized. However, we should be prepared for this report to be cited frequently by activists, and work\ntogether to balance coverage,\" the email said.\nOn fighting soda taxes:\nCoca-cola targeted two Connecticut legislative proposals for taxes on sugary beverages, along with a West Virginia\nbill, according to the leaked emails.\n\"We are working with coalition partners to ensure the [Connecticut] bills do not advance,\" reads an alleged February\n2016 email from Jennifer Lemming, a member\nmember of the company's Government Relations team.\nMoreover, \"coalition-building work is underway in the California cities of San Francisco, Richmond, Oakland and\nWatsonville in preparation for potential beverage tax ballot measures in June or November 2016,\" the email\ncontinues.\nhttp://www.marketwatch.com/story/hacked-emails-show-how-coca-cola-fights-the-soda-tax-at-local-and-global-levels-2016-10-18/print\n2/4\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nxpj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the date mentioned in the header of the document?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "10/19/2016",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
626
|
Coca-Cola targeted how many Connecticut legislative proposals for taxes on beverages?
|
two
|
Page 2
10/19/2016
Hacked emails show how Coca-cola fights the soda tax at local and global levels - MarketWatch
unprecedented action to reduce calories and sugar from beverages in the American diet - particularly in areas with
the highest rates of obesity in the country."
Related: 10 things Coke, Pepsi and the soda industry won't say
PepsiCo's 2025 goals, announced Monday, do move the needle forward. It plans to have two-thirds of its global
beverage volume contain 100 or less calories from added sugar per serving - a standard that less than 40% of its
current volume meets - along with goals for saturated fat and sodium.
Read: PepsiCo sets goal to reduce sugar and saturated fat in its products by 2025
PepsiCo, some analysts say, has been the beverage giant already setting the nutritional standard in its industry.
Gatorade, one of the company's more popular products, already has 100 or less calories from added sugar per
serving, Nestle noted
CSPI president Michael Jacobson offered PepsiCo a "kudos" for setting specific nutritional goals, and saying he)
(hoped others would follow its example.)
Coca-cola referred MarketWatch to its partnerships with various health initiatives and ongoing efforts to reformulate
drinks and make them smaller.
But these companies still have a responsibility for the global obesity and diabetics epidemics, O'Hara said.)
"Soda is sugar water. It's water with sugar. And there is no good excuse for that being the default beverage, and
that's what industry has done over the last several decades," he said. "That has had very bad health consequences
for the nation and the globe."
Read excerpts from the leaked Coca-cola emails below.
On unfriendly dietary guidelines and a coverage 'balance':
A report for the 2015 Dietary Guidelines, which included measures to decrease sugar-sweetened beverage
consumption, "far exceed the scope" of the advisory committee's role, said an alleged email written by Katherine
Loatman, the executive director of industry group International Council of Beverages Associations, and forwarded to
Coca Cola executives.
(Some of those measures, including removing full-calorie drinks from U.S. schools, Coca-cola told MarketWatch it
has completed).
"In terms of process, there is an opportunity for review and modification from the U.S. federal government before the
Guidelines are finalized. However, we should be prepared for this report to be cited frequently by activists, and work
together to balance coverage," the email said.
On fighting soda taxes:
Coca-cola targeted two Connecticut legislative proposals for taxes on sugary beverages, along with a West Virginia
bill, according to the leaked emails.
"We are working with coalition partners to ensure the [Connecticut] bills do not advance," reads an alleged February
2016 email from Jennifer Lemming, a member
member of the company's Government Relations team.
Moreover, "coalition-building work is underway in the California cities of San Francisco, Richmond, Oakland and
Watsonville in preparation for potential beverage tax ballot measures in June or November 2016," the email
continues.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/hacked-emails-show-how-coca-cola-fights-the-soda-tax-at-local-and-global-levels-2016-10-18/print
2/4
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nxpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 365,
"image": "nxpj0226_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "nxpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 743
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\n10/19/2016\nHacked emails show how Coca-cola fights the soda tax at local and global levels - MarketWatch\nunprecedented action to reduce calories and sugar from beverages in the American diet - particularly in areas with\nthe highest rates of obesity in the country.\"\nRelated: 10 things Coke, Pepsi and the soda industry won't say\nPepsiCo's 2025 goals, announced Monday, do move the needle forward. It plans to have two-thirds of its global\nbeverage volume contain 100 or less calories from added sugar per serving - a standard that less than 40% of its\ncurrent volume meets - along with goals for saturated fat and sodium.\nRead: PepsiCo sets goal to reduce sugar and saturated fat in its products by 2025\nPepsiCo, some analysts say, has been the beverage giant already setting the nutritional standard in its industry.\nGatorade, one of the company's more popular products, already has 100 or less calories from added sugar per\nserving, Nestle noted\nCSPI president Michael Jacobson offered PepsiCo a \"kudos\" for setting specific nutritional goals, and saying he)\n(hoped others would follow its example.)\nCoca-cola referred MarketWatch to its partnerships with various health initiatives and ongoing efforts to reformulate\ndrinks and make them smaller.\nBut these companies still have a responsibility for the global obesity and diabetics epidemics, O'Hara said.)\n\"Soda is sugar water. It's water with sugar. And there is no good excuse for that being the default beverage, and\nthat's what industry has done over the last several decades,\" he said. \"That has had very bad health consequences\nfor the nation and the globe.\"\nRead excerpts from the leaked Coca-cola emails below.\nOn unfriendly dietary guidelines and a coverage 'balance':\nA report for the 2015 Dietary Guidelines, which included measures to decrease sugar-sweetened beverage\nconsumption, \"far exceed the scope\" of the advisory committee's role, said an alleged email written by Katherine\nLoatman, the executive director of industry group International Council of Beverages Associations, and forwarded to\nCoca Cola executives.\n(Some of those measures, including removing full-calorie drinks from U.S. schools, Coca-cola told MarketWatch it\nhas completed).\n\"In terms of process, there is an opportunity for review and modification from the U.S. federal government before the\nGuidelines are finalized. However, we should be prepared for this report to be cited frequently by activists, and work\ntogether to balance coverage,\" the email said.\nOn fighting soda taxes:\nCoca-cola targeted two Connecticut legislative proposals for taxes on sugary beverages, along with a West Virginia\nbill, according to the leaked emails.\n\"We are working with coalition partners to ensure the [Connecticut] bills do not advance,\" reads an alleged February\n2016 email from Jennifer Lemming, a member\nmember of the company's Government Relations team.\nMoreover, \"coalition-building work is underway in the California cities of San Francisco, Richmond, Oakland and\nWatsonville in preparation for potential beverage tax ballot measures in June or November 2016,\" the email\ncontinues.\nhttp://www.marketwatch.com/story/hacked-emails-show-how-coca-cola-fights-the-soda-tax-at-local-and-global-levels-2016-10-18/print\n2/4\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nxpj0226\n\nQuestion: Coca-Cola targeted how many Connecticut legislative proposals for taxes on beverages?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "two",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
627
|
What is the Commission File No.?
|
001-02217
|
Page 1
COCA-COLA F
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20545
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from
Commission File No. 001-02217
The Coca Cola Company
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE
58-0628465
(State or other jurisdiction of
(IRS Employer
incorporation or organization)
Identification No.)
One Coca-cola Plaza
Atlanta, Georgia
30313
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (404) 676-2121
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Name of each exchange on which registered
COMMON STOCK, $0.25 PAR VALUE
NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes X No
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Exchange Act. Yes No X
indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the
past 90 days. Yes [X No
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T ($ 232.405 of this chapter)
Yes X No
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K ($ 229.405 of this chapter) is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a
smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting
company" in Rule 126-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer X
Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer [ Smaller reporting company [
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes _ No [X]
The aggregate market value of the common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant (assuming for these purposes, but
without conceding, that all executive officers and Directors are "affiliates" of the Registrant) as of July 1, 2011, the last
business day of the Registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $148,385,503,727 (based on the closing sale
price of the Registrant's Common Stock on that date as reported on the New York Stock Exchange).
The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant's Common Stock as of February 20, 2012, was 2,263,204,221.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Company's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareowners to be held on April 25, 2012, are
incorporated by reference in Part III
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/kxpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 367,
"image": "kxpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "kxpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 943
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nCOCA-COLA F\nUNITED STATES\nSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION\nWashington, D.C. 20545\nFORM 10-K\nANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES\nEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934\nFor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011\nOR\nTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES\nEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934\nFor the transition period from\nCommission File No. 001-02217\nThe Coca Cola Company\n(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)\nDELAWARE\n58-0628465\n(State or other jurisdiction of\n(IRS Employer\nincorporation or organization)\nIdentification No.)\nOne Coca-cola Plaza\nAtlanta, Georgia\n30313\n(Address of principal executive offices)\n(Zip Code)\nRegistrant's telephone number, including area code: (404) 676-2121\nSecurities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:\nTitle of each class\nName of each exchange on which registered\nCOMMON STOCK, $0.25 PAR VALUE\nNEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE\nSecurities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None\nIndicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.\nYes X No\nIndicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the\nExchange Act. Yes No X\nindicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the\nSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the\npast 90 days. Yes [X No\nIndicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every\nInteractive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T ($ 232.405 of this chapter)\nYes X No\nduring the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).\nIndicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K ($ 229.405 of this chapter) is\nnot contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information\nstatements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.\nIndicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a\nsmaller reporting company. See the definitions of \"large accelerated filer,\" \"accelerated filer\" and \"smaller reporting\ncompany\" in Rule 126-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):\nLarge accelerated filer X\nAccelerated filer\nNon-accelerated filer [ Smaller reporting company [\n(Do not check if a smaller reporting company\nIndicate by check mark if the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes _ No [X]\nThe aggregate market value of the common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant (assuming for these purposes, but\nwithout conceding, that all executive officers and Directors are \"affiliates\" of the Registrant) as of July 1, 2011, the last\nbusiness day of the Registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $148,385,503,727 (based on the closing sale\nprice of the Registrant's Common Stock on that date as reported on the New York Stock Exchange).\nThe number of shares outstanding of the Registrant's Common Stock as of February 20, 2012, was 2,263,204,221.\nDOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE\nPortions of the Company's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareowners to be held on April 25, 2012, are\nincorporated by reference in Part III\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/kxpj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the Commission File No.?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "001-02217",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
628
|
What is the name of the place the UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION is from?
|
Washington, d.c.
|
Page 1
COCA-COLA F
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20545
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from
Commission File No. 001-02217
The Coca Cola Company
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE
58-0628465
(State or other jurisdiction of
(IRS Employer
incorporation or organization)
Identification No.)
One Coca-cola Plaza
Atlanta, Georgia
30313
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (404) 676-2121
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Name of each exchange on which registered
COMMON STOCK, $0.25 PAR VALUE
NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes X No
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Exchange Act. Yes No X
indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the
past 90 days. Yes [X No
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T ($ 232.405 of this chapter)
Yes X No
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K ($ 229.405 of this chapter) is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a
smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting
company" in Rule 126-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer X
Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer [ Smaller reporting company [
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes _ No [X]
The aggregate market value of the common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant (assuming for these purposes, but
without conceding, that all executive officers and Directors are "affiliates" of the Registrant) as of July 1, 2011, the last
business day of the Registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $148,385,503,727 (based on the closing sale
price of the Registrant's Common Stock on that date as reported on the New York Stock Exchange).
The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant's Common Stock as of February 20, 2012, was 2,263,204,221.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Company's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareowners to be held on April 25, 2012, are
incorporated by reference in Part III
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/kxpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 367,
"image": "kxpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "kxpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 958
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nCOCA-COLA F\nUNITED STATES\nSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION\nWashington, D.C. 20545\nFORM 10-K\nANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES\nEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934\nFor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011\nOR\nTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES\nEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934\nFor the transition period from\nCommission File No. 001-02217\nThe Coca Cola Company\n(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)\nDELAWARE\n58-0628465\n(State or other jurisdiction of\n(IRS Employer\nincorporation or organization)\nIdentification No.)\nOne Coca-cola Plaza\nAtlanta, Georgia\n30313\n(Address of principal executive offices)\n(Zip Code)\nRegistrant's telephone number, including area code: (404) 676-2121\nSecurities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:\nTitle of each class\nName of each exchange on which registered\nCOMMON STOCK, $0.25 PAR VALUE\nNEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE\nSecurities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None\nIndicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.\nYes X No\nIndicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the\nExchange Act. Yes No X\nindicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the\nSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the\npast 90 days. Yes [X No\nIndicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every\nInteractive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T ($ 232.405 of this chapter)\nYes X No\nduring the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).\nIndicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K ($ 229.405 of this chapter) is\nnot contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information\nstatements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.\nIndicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a\nsmaller reporting company. See the definitions of \"large accelerated filer,\" \"accelerated filer\" and \"smaller reporting\ncompany\" in Rule 126-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):\nLarge accelerated filer X\nAccelerated filer\nNon-accelerated filer [ Smaller reporting company [\n(Do not check if a smaller reporting company\nIndicate by check mark if the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes _ No [X]\nThe aggregate market value of the common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant (assuming for these purposes, but\nwithout conceding, that all executive officers and Directors are \"affiliates\" of the Registrant) as of July 1, 2011, the last\nbusiness day of the Registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $148,385,503,727 (based on the closing sale\nprice of the Registrant's Common Stock on that date as reported on the New York Stock Exchange).\nThe number of shares outstanding of the Registrant's Common Stock as of February 20, 2012, was 2,263,204,221.\nDOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE\nPortions of the Company's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareowners to be held on April 25, 2012, are\nincorporated by reference in Part III\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/kxpj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the name of the place the UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION is from?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Washington, d.c.",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
629
|
What is the COMMON STOCK PAR VALUE?
|
$0.25
|
Page 1
COCA-COLA F
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20545
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from
Commission File No. 001-02217
The Coca Cola Company
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE
58-0628465
(State or other jurisdiction of
(IRS Employer
incorporation or organization)
Identification No.)
One Coca-cola Plaza
Atlanta, Georgia
30313
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (404) 676-2121
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Name of each exchange on which registered
COMMON STOCK, $0.25 PAR VALUE
NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes X No
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Exchange Act. Yes No X
indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the
past 90 days. Yes [X No
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T ($ 232.405 of this chapter)
Yes X No
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K ($ 229.405 of this chapter) is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a
smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting
company" in Rule 126-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer X
Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer [ Smaller reporting company [
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes _ No [X]
The aggregate market value of the common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant (assuming for these purposes, but
without conceding, that all executive officers and Directors are "affiliates" of the Registrant) as of July 1, 2011, the last
business day of the Registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $148,385,503,727 (based on the closing sale
price of the Registrant's Common Stock on that date as reported on the New York Stock Exchange).
The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant's Common Stock as of February 20, 2012, was 2,263,204,221.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Company's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareowners to be held on April 25, 2012, are
incorporated by reference in Part III
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/kxpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 367,
"image": "kxpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "kxpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 944
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nCOCA-COLA F\nUNITED STATES\nSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION\nWashington, D.C. 20545\nFORM 10-K\nANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES\nEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934\nFor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011\nOR\nTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES\nEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934\nFor the transition period from\nCommission File No. 001-02217\nThe Coca Cola Company\n(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)\nDELAWARE\n58-0628465\n(State or other jurisdiction of\n(IRS Employer\nincorporation or organization)\nIdentification No.)\nOne Coca-cola Plaza\nAtlanta, Georgia\n30313\n(Address of principal executive offices)\n(Zip Code)\nRegistrant's telephone number, including area code: (404) 676-2121\nSecurities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:\nTitle of each class\nName of each exchange on which registered\nCOMMON STOCK, $0.25 PAR VALUE\nNEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE\nSecurities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None\nIndicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.\nYes X No\nIndicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the\nExchange Act. Yes No X\nindicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the\nSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the\npast 90 days. Yes [X No\nIndicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every\nInteractive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T ($ 232.405 of this chapter)\nYes X No\nduring the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).\nIndicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K ($ 229.405 of this chapter) is\nnot contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information\nstatements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.\nIndicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a\nsmaller reporting company. See the definitions of \"large accelerated filer,\" \"accelerated filer\" and \"smaller reporting\ncompany\" in Rule 126-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):\nLarge accelerated filer X\nAccelerated filer\nNon-accelerated filer [ Smaller reporting company [\n(Do not check if a smaller reporting company\nIndicate by check mark if the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes _ No [X]\nThe aggregate market value of the common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant (assuming for these purposes, but\nwithout conceding, that all executive officers and Directors are \"affiliates\" of the Registrant) as of July 1, 2011, the last\nbusiness day of the Registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $148,385,503,727 (based on the closing sale\nprice of the Registrant's Common Stock on that date as reported on the New York Stock Exchange).\nThe number of shares outstanding of the Registrant's Common Stock as of February 20, 2012, was 2,263,204,221.\nDOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE\nPortions of the Company's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareowners to be held on April 25, 2012, are\nincorporated by reference in Part III\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/kxpj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the COMMON STOCK PAR VALUE?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "$0.25",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
630
|
Where is One Coca-Cola Plaza located?
|
Atlanta, georgia
|
Page 1
COCA-COLA F
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20545
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from
Commission File No. 001-02217
The Coca Cola Company
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE
58-0628465
(State or other jurisdiction of
(IRS Employer
incorporation or organization)
Identification No.)
One Coca-cola Plaza
Atlanta, Georgia
30313
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (404) 676-2121
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Name of each exchange on which registered
COMMON STOCK, $0.25 PAR VALUE
NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes X No
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Exchange Act. Yes No X
indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the
past 90 days. Yes [X No
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T ($ 232.405 of this chapter)
Yes X No
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K ($ 229.405 of this chapter) is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a
smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting
company" in Rule 126-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer X
Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer [ Smaller reporting company [
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes _ No [X]
The aggregate market value of the common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant (assuming for these purposes, but
without conceding, that all executive officers and Directors are "affiliates" of the Registrant) as of July 1, 2011, the last
business day of the Registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $148,385,503,727 (based on the closing sale
price of the Registrant's Common Stock on that date as reported on the New York Stock Exchange).
The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant's Common Stock as of February 20, 2012, was 2,263,204,221.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Company's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareowners to be held on April 25, 2012, are
incorporated by reference in Part III
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/kxpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 367,
"image": "kxpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "kxpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 944
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nCOCA-COLA F\nUNITED STATES\nSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION\nWashington, D.C. 20545\nFORM 10-K\nANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES\nEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934\nFor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011\nOR\nTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES\nEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934\nFor the transition period from\nCommission File No. 001-02217\nThe Coca Cola Company\n(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)\nDELAWARE\n58-0628465\n(State or other jurisdiction of\n(IRS Employer\nincorporation or organization)\nIdentification No.)\nOne Coca-cola Plaza\nAtlanta, Georgia\n30313\n(Address of principal executive offices)\n(Zip Code)\nRegistrant's telephone number, including area code: (404) 676-2121\nSecurities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:\nTitle of each class\nName of each exchange on which registered\nCOMMON STOCK, $0.25 PAR VALUE\nNEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE\nSecurities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None\nIndicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.\nYes X No\nIndicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the\nExchange Act. Yes No X\nindicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the\nSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the\npast 90 days. Yes [X No\nIndicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every\nInteractive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T ($ 232.405 of this chapter)\nYes X No\nduring the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).\nIndicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K ($ 229.405 of this chapter) is\nnot contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information\nstatements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.\nIndicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a\nsmaller reporting company. See the definitions of \"large accelerated filer,\" \"accelerated filer\" and \"smaller reporting\ncompany\" in Rule 126-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):\nLarge accelerated filer X\nAccelerated filer\nNon-accelerated filer [ Smaller reporting company [\n(Do not check if a smaller reporting company\nIndicate by check mark if the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes _ No [X]\nThe aggregate market value of the common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant (assuming for these purposes, but\nwithout conceding, that all executive officers and Directors are \"affiliates\" of the Registrant) as of July 1, 2011, the last\nbusiness day of the Registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $148,385,503,727 (based on the closing sale\nprice of the Registrant's Common Stock on that date as reported on the New York Stock Exchange).\nThe number of shares outstanding of the Registrant's Common Stock as of February 20, 2012, was 2,263,204,221.\nDOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE\nPortions of the Company's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareowners to be held on April 25, 2012, are\nincorporated by reference in Part III\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/kxpj0226\n\nQuestion: Where is One Coca-Cola Plaza located?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Atlanta, georgia",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
640
|
In which year manufacture of carbonated water began ?
|
1772
|
Page 12
JEjs1 Mikq1, IERIbjsiti
CARBONATED WATER
IN SOFT DRINKS
ll soft drink products of
The Coca-cola Company
ance, taste and aroma and to
are wholesome beverages pro-
remove certain minerals and im-
duced in compliance with state
purities. Carbon dioxide is then
and federal food laws, and the
dissolved in the treated water in
laws of more than 155 countries
a device known as a carbonator.
where we market our products.
In most modern bottling plants,
treated water, beverage syrup and
Throughout history, people
carbon dioxide are blended
have been fascinated by carbon-
together to make the soft drink.
ated water. The ancient Greeks
Like most other food ingre-
and Romans bathed in natural
dients, carbon dioxide was
mineral springs. Later, Europeans
reviewed by a group of prominent
drank these naturally carbonated
scientists for the Food and Drug
waters for their health.
Administration and its safety was
The manufacture of car-
confirmed. Carbonated soft drinks
bonated water began in England
provide a pleasant way to satisfy
in 1772 when Joseph Priestley
the body's need for liquids. Car-
discovered how to entrap carbon
bonation also enhances a person's
dioxide in water. By the 1830s, the
appreciation of flavor in beverages
use and popularity of sparkling
and accompanying foods. In short,
water had spread to America
it adds to the thirst-quenching sen-
Soon, with the addition of sweet-
sation perceived when soft drinks
are enjoyed.
eners, fruit juices and flavors.
these drinks began to be enjoyed
for refreshment rather than for
For more technical informa-
tion on carbonated water or
any medicinal value.
From the time these efferves
other ingredient-related ques-
cent soft drinks first began to be
tions, please write or call:
made, the same ingredient that
makes them bubble-carbon
Consumer Information Center
Coca-cola USA
dioxide-has been used. Carbon
dioxide occurs naturally in the at-
P.O. Drawer 1734
Atlanta, Georgia 30301
mosphere as a colorless, odorless
gas. It is what we breathe out and
1-800-GET COKE
what plants take in. In soft drinks,
(438-2653)
carbon dioxide produces the dis-
tinctive "sparkling" quality and
that "bubbling" effect as the drink
is poured from the container.
To carbonate a soft drink,
bottlers start out by treating ordi-
Consumer Information Center
Coca Cola UST
nary water to improve its appear-
A Division of The Coca-cola Company
1/84
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Evaluation of the health aspects of carbon dioxide as a food ingredient
Springfield, Virginia: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Infor-
mation Service, 1980 (NTIS: PB 80 104 615).
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 370,
"image": "mtyj0226_12.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mtyj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "12"
}
| 685
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 12\nJEjs1 Mikq1, IERIbjsiti\nCARBONATED WATER\nIN SOFT DRINKS\nll soft drink products of\nThe Coca-cola Company\nance, taste and aroma and to\nare wholesome beverages pro-\nremove certain minerals and im-\nduced in compliance with state\npurities. Carbon dioxide is then\nand federal food laws, and the\ndissolved in the treated water in\nlaws of more than 155 countries\na device known as a carbonator.\nwhere we market our products.\nIn most modern bottling plants,\ntreated water, beverage syrup and\nThroughout history, people\ncarbon dioxide are blended\nhave been fascinated by carbon-\ntogether to make the soft drink.\nated water. The ancient Greeks\nLike most other food ingre-\nand Romans bathed in natural\ndients, carbon dioxide was\nmineral springs. Later, Europeans\nreviewed by a group of prominent\ndrank these naturally carbonated\nscientists for the Food and Drug\nwaters for their health.\nAdministration and its safety was\nThe manufacture of car-\nconfirmed. Carbonated soft drinks\nbonated water began in England\nprovide a pleasant way to satisfy\nin 1772 when Joseph Priestley\nthe body's need for liquids. Car-\ndiscovered how to entrap carbon\nbonation also enhances a person's\ndioxide in water. By the 1830s, the\nappreciation of flavor in beverages\nuse and popularity of sparkling\nand accompanying foods. In short,\nwater had spread to America\nit adds to the thirst-quenching sen-\nSoon, with the addition of sweet-\nsation perceived when soft drinks\nare enjoyed.\neners, fruit juices and flavors.\nthese drinks began to be enjoyed\nfor refreshment rather than for\nFor more technical informa-\ntion on carbonated water or\nany medicinal value.\nFrom the time these efferves\nother ingredient-related ques-\ncent soft drinks first began to be\ntions, please write or call:\nmade, the same ingredient that\nmakes them bubble-carbon\nConsumer Information Center\nCoca-cola USA\ndioxide-has been used. Carbon\ndioxide occurs naturally in the at-\nP.O. Drawer 1734\nAtlanta, Georgia 30301\nmosphere as a colorless, odorless\ngas. It is what we breathe out and\n1-800-GET COKE\nwhat plants take in. In soft drinks,\n(438-2653)\ncarbon dioxide produces the dis-\ntinctive \"sparkling\" quality and\nthat \"bubbling\" effect as the drink\nis poured from the container.\nTo carbonate a soft drink,\nbottlers start out by treating ordi-\nConsumer Information Center\nCoca Cola UST\nnary water to improve its appear-\nA Division of The Coca-cola Company\n1/84\nADDITIONAL INFORMATION\nEvaluation of the health aspects of carbon dioxide as a food ingredient\nSpringfield, Virginia: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Infor-\nmation Service, 1980 (NTIS: PB 80 104 615).\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226\n\nQuestion: In which year manufacture of carbonated water began ?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1772",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
641
|
In how many countries coca-cola markets its products?
|
more than 155 countries
|
Page 12
JEjs1 Mikq1, IERIbjsiti
CARBONATED WATER
IN SOFT DRINKS
ll soft drink products of
The Coca-cola Company
ance, taste and aroma and to
are wholesome beverages pro-
remove certain minerals and im-
duced in compliance with state
purities. Carbon dioxide is then
and federal food laws, and the
dissolved in the treated water in
laws of more than 155 countries
a device known as a carbonator.
where we market our products.
In most modern bottling plants,
treated water, beverage syrup and
Throughout history, people
carbon dioxide are blended
have been fascinated by carbon-
together to make the soft drink.
ated water. The ancient Greeks
Like most other food ingre-
and Romans bathed in natural
dients, carbon dioxide was
mineral springs. Later, Europeans
reviewed by a group of prominent
drank these naturally carbonated
scientists for the Food and Drug
waters for their health.
Administration and its safety was
The manufacture of car-
confirmed. Carbonated soft drinks
bonated water began in England
provide a pleasant way to satisfy
in 1772 when Joseph Priestley
the body's need for liquids. Car-
discovered how to entrap carbon
bonation also enhances a person's
dioxide in water. By the 1830s, the
appreciation of flavor in beverages
use and popularity of sparkling
and accompanying foods. In short,
water had spread to America
it adds to the thirst-quenching sen-
Soon, with the addition of sweet-
sation perceived when soft drinks
are enjoyed.
eners, fruit juices and flavors.
these drinks began to be enjoyed
for refreshment rather than for
For more technical informa-
tion on carbonated water or
any medicinal value.
From the time these efferves
other ingredient-related ques-
cent soft drinks first began to be
tions, please write or call:
made, the same ingredient that
makes them bubble-carbon
Consumer Information Center
Coca-cola USA
dioxide-has been used. Carbon
dioxide occurs naturally in the at-
P.O. Drawer 1734
Atlanta, Georgia 30301
mosphere as a colorless, odorless
gas. It is what we breathe out and
1-800-GET COKE
what plants take in. In soft drinks,
(438-2653)
carbon dioxide produces the dis-
tinctive "sparkling" quality and
that "bubbling" effect as the drink
is poured from the container.
To carbonate a soft drink,
bottlers start out by treating ordi-
Consumer Information Center
Coca Cola UST
nary water to improve its appear-
A Division of The Coca-cola Company
1/84
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Evaluation of the health aspects of carbon dioxide as a food ingredient
Springfield, Virginia: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Infor-
mation Service, 1980 (NTIS: PB 80 104 615).
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 370,
"image": "mtyj0226_12.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mtyj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "12"
}
| 690
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 12\nJEjs1 Mikq1, IERIbjsiti\nCARBONATED WATER\nIN SOFT DRINKS\nll soft drink products of\nThe Coca-cola Company\nance, taste and aroma and to\nare wholesome beverages pro-\nremove certain minerals and im-\nduced in compliance with state\npurities. Carbon dioxide is then\nand federal food laws, and the\ndissolved in the treated water in\nlaws of more than 155 countries\na device known as a carbonator.\nwhere we market our products.\nIn most modern bottling plants,\ntreated water, beverage syrup and\nThroughout history, people\ncarbon dioxide are blended\nhave been fascinated by carbon-\ntogether to make the soft drink.\nated water. The ancient Greeks\nLike most other food ingre-\nand Romans bathed in natural\ndients, carbon dioxide was\nmineral springs. Later, Europeans\nreviewed by a group of prominent\ndrank these naturally carbonated\nscientists for the Food and Drug\nwaters for their health.\nAdministration and its safety was\nThe manufacture of car-\nconfirmed. Carbonated soft drinks\nbonated water began in England\nprovide a pleasant way to satisfy\nin 1772 when Joseph Priestley\nthe body's need for liquids. Car-\ndiscovered how to entrap carbon\nbonation also enhances a person's\ndioxide in water. By the 1830s, the\nappreciation of flavor in beverages\nuse and popularity of sparkling\nand accompanying foods. In short,\nwater had spread to America\nit adds to the thirst-quenching sen-\nSoon, with the addition of sweet-\nsation perceived when soft drinks\nare enjoyed.\neners, fruit juices and flavors.\nthese drinks began to be enjoyed\nfor refreshment rather than for\nFor more technical informa-\ntion on carbonated water or\nany medicinal value.\nFrom the time these efferves\nother ingredient-related ques-\ncent soft drinks first began to be\ntions, please write or call:\nmade, the same ingredient that\nmakes them bubble-carbon\nConsumer Information Center\nCoca-cola USA\ndioxide-has been used. Carbon\ndioxide occurs naturally in the at-\nP.O. Drawer 1734\nAtlanta, Georgia 30301\nmosphere as a colorless, odorless\ngas. It is what we breathe out and\n1-800-GET COKE\nwhat plants take in. In soft drinks,\n(438-2653)\ncarbon dioxide produces the dis-\ntinctive \"sparkling\" quality and\nthat \"bubbling\" effect as the drink\nis poured from the container.\nTo carbonate a soft drink,\nbottlers start out by treating ordi-\nConsumer Information Center\nCoca Cola UST\nnary water to improve its appear-\nA Division of The Coca-cola Company\n1/84\nADDITIONAL INFORMATION\nEvaluation of the health aspects of carbon dioxide as a food ingredient\nSpringfield, Virginia: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Infor-\nmation Service, 1980 (NTIS: PB 80 104 615).\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226\n\nQuestion: In how many countries coca-cola markets its products?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "more than 155 countries",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
642
|
What does the carbon dioxide produce in soft drinks ?
|
produces the distinctive "sparkling" quality and that "bubbling" effect as the drink is poured from the container.
|
Page 12
JEjs1 Mikq1, IERIbjsiti
CARBONATED WATER
IN SOFT DRINKS
ll soft drink products of
The Coca-cola Company
ance, taste and aroma and to
are wholesome beverages pro-
remove certain minerals and im-
duced in compliance with state
purities. Carbon dioxide is then
and federal food laws, and the
dissolved in the treated water in
laws of more than 155 countries
a device known as a carbonator.
where we market our products.
In most modern bottling plants,
treated water, beverage syrup and
Throughout history, people
carbon dioxide are blended
have been fascinated by carbon-
together to make the soft drink.
ated water. The ancient Greeks
Like most other food ingre-
and Romans bathed in natural
dients, carbon dioxide was
mineral springs. Later, Europeans
reviewed by a group of prominent
drank these naturally carbonated
scientists for the Food and Drug
waters for their health.
Administration and its safety was
The manufacture of car-
confirmed. Carbonated soft drinks
bonated water began in England
provide a pleasant way to satisfy
in 1772 when Joseph Priestley
the body's need for liquids. Car-
discovered how to entrap carbon
bonation also enhances a person's
dioxide in water. By the 1830s, the
appreciation of flavor in beverages
use and popularity of sparkling
and accompanying foods. In short,
water had spread to America
it adds to the thirst-quenching sen-
Soon, with the addition of sweet-
sation perceived when soft drinks
are enjoyed.
eners, fruit juices and flavors.
these drinks began to be enjoyed
for refreshment rather than for
For more technical informa-
tion on carbonated water or
any medicinal value.
From the time these efferves
other ingredient-related ques-
cent soft drinks first began to be
tions, please write or call:
made, the same ingredient that
makes them bubble-carbon
Consumer Information Center
Coca-cola USA
dioxide-has been used. Carbon
dioxide occurs naturally in the at-
P.O. Drawer 1734
Atlanta, Georgia 30301
mosphere as a colorless, odorless
gas. It is what we breathe out and
1-800-GET COKE
what plants take in. In soft drinks,
(438-2653)
carbon dioxide produces the dis-
tinctive "sparkling" quality and
that "bubbling" effect as the drink
is poured from the container.
To carbonate a soft drink,
bottlers start out by treating ordi-
Consumer Information Center
Coca Cola UST
nary water to improve its appear-
A Division of The Coca-cola Company
1/84
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Evaluation of the health aspects of carbon dioxide as a food ingredient
Springfield, Virginia: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Infor-
mation Service, 1980 (NTIS: PB 80 104 615).
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 370,
"image": "mtyj0226_12.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mtyj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "12"
}
| 710
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 12\nJEjs1 Mikq1, IERIbjsiti\nCARBONATED WATER\nIN SOFT DRINKS\nll soft drink products of\nThe Coca-cola Company\nance, taste and aroma and to\nare wholesome beverages pro-\nremove certain minerals and im-\nduced in compliance with state\npurities. Carbon dioxide is then\nand federal food laws, and the\ndissolved in the treated water in\nlaws of more than 155 countries\na device known as a carbonator.\nwhere we market our products.\nIn most modern bottling plants,\ntreated water, beverage syrup and\nThroughout history, people\ncarbon dioxide are blended\nhave been fascinated by carbon-\ntogether to make the soft drink.\nated water. The ancient Greeks\nLike most other food ingre-\nand Romans bathed in natural\ndients, carbon dioxide was\nmineral springs. Later, Europeans\nreviewed by a group of prominent\ndrank these naturally carbonated\nscientists for the Food and Drug\nwaters for their health.\nAdministration and its safety was\nThe manufacture of car-\nconfirmed. Carbonated soft drinks\nbonated water began in England\nprovide a pleasant way to satisfy\nin 1772 when Joseph Priestley\nthe body's need for liquids. Car-\ndiscovered how to entrap carbon\nbonation also enhances a person's\ndioxide in water. By the 1830s, the\nappreciation of flavor in beverages\nuse and popularity of sparkling\nand accompanying foods. In short,\nwater had spread to America\nit adds to the thirst-quenching sen-\nSoon, with the addition of sweet-\nsation perceived when soft drinks\nare enjoyed.\neners, fruit juices and flavors.\nthese drinks began to be enjoyed\nfor refreshment rather than for\nFor more technical informa-\ntion on carbonated water or\nany medicinal value.\nFrom the time these efferves\nother ingredient-related ques-\ncent soft drinks first began to be\ntions, please write or call:\nmade, the same ingredient that\nmakes them bubble-carbon\nConsumer Information Center\nCoca-cola USA\ndioxide-has been used. Carbon\ndioxide occurs naturally in the at-\nP.O. Drawer 1734\nAtlanta, Georgia 30301\nmosphere as a colorless, odorless\ngas. It is what we breathe out and\n1-800-GET COKE\nwhat plants take in. In soft drinks,\n(438-2653)\ncarbon dioxide produces the dis-\ntinctive \"sparkling\" quality and\nthat \"bubbling\" effect as the drink\nis poured from the container.\nTo carbonate a soft drink,\nbottlers start out by treating ordi-\nConsumer Information Center\nCoca Cola UST\nnary water to improve its appear-\nA Division of The Coca-cola Company\n1/84\nADDITIONAL INFORMATION\nEvaluation of the health aspects of carbon dioxide as a food ingredient\nSpringfield, Virginia: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Infor-\nmation Service, 1980 (NTIS: PB 80 104 615).\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226\n\nQuestion: What does the carbon dioxide produce in soft drinks ?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "produces the distinctive \"sparkling\" quality and that \"bubbling\" effect as the drink is poured from the container.",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
643
|
Who reviewed about the safety of carbon dioxide in food?
|
by a group of prominent scientists for the food and drug administration
|
Page 12
JEjs1 Mikq1, IERIbjsiti
CARBONATED WATER
IN SOFT DRINKS
ll soft drink products of
The Coca-cola Company
ance, taste and aroma and to
are wholesome beverages pro-
remove certain minerals and im-
duced in compliance with state
purities. Carbon dioxide is then
and federal food laws, and the
dissolved in the treated water in
laws of more than 155 countries
a device known as a carbonator.
where we market our products.
In most modern bottling plants,
treated water, beverage syrup and
Throughout history, people
carbon dioxide are blended
have been fascinated by carbon-
together to make the soft drink.
ated water. The ancient Greeks
Like most other food ingre-
and Romans bathed in natural
dients, carbon dioxide was
mineral springs. Later, Europeans
reviewed by a group of prominent
drank these naturally carbonated
scientists for the Food and Drug
waters for their health.
Administration and its safety was
The manufacture of car-
confirmed. Carbonated soft drinks
bonated water began in England
provide a pleasant way to satisfy
in 1772 when Joseph Priestley
the body's need for liquids. Car-
discovered how to entrap carbon
bonation also enhances a person's
dioxide in water. By the 1830s, the
appreciation of flavor in beverages
use and popularity of sparkling
and accompanying foods. In short,
water had spread to America
it adds to the thirst-quenching sen-
Soon, with the addition of sweet-
sation perceived when soft drinks
are enjoyed.
eners, fruit juices and flavors.
these drinks began to be enjoyed
for refreshment rather than for
For more technical informa-
tion on carbonated water or
any medicinal value.
From the time these efferves
other ingredient-related ques-
cent soft drinks first began to be
tions, please write or call:
made, the same ingredient that
makes them bubble-carbon
Consumer Information Center
Coca-cola USA
dioxide-has been used. Carbon
dioxide occurs naturally in the at-
P.O. Drawer 1734
Atlanta, Georgia 30301
mosphere as a colorless, odorless
gas. It is what we breathe out and
1-800-GET COKE
what plants take in. In soft drinks,
(438-2653)
carbon dioxide produces the dis-
tinctive "sparkling" quality and
that "bubbling" effect as the drink
is poured from the container.
To carbonate a soft drink,
bottlers start out by treating ordi-
Consumer Information Center
Coca Cola UST
nary water to improve its appear-
A Division of The Coca-cola Company
1/84
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Evaluation of the health aspects of carbon dioxide as a food ingredient
Springfield, Virginia: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Infor-
mation Service, 1980 (NTIS: PB 80 104 615).
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 370,
"image": "mtyj0226_12.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mtyj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "12"
}
| 696
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 12\nJEjs1 Mikq1, IERIbjsiti\nCARBONATED WATER\nIN SOFT DRINKS\nll soft drink products of\nThe Coca-cola Company\nance, taste and aroma and to\nare wholesome beverages pro-\nremove certain minerals and im-\nduced in compliance with state\npurities. Carbon dioxide is then\nand federal food laws, and the\ndissolved in the treated water in\nlaws of more than 155 countries\na device known as a carbonator.\nwhere we market our products.\nIn most modern bottling plants,\ntreated water, beverage syrup and\nThroughout history, people\ncarbon dioxide are blended\nhave been fascinated by carbon-\ntogether to make the soft drink.\nated water. The ancient Greeks\nLike most other food ingre-\nand Romans bathed in natural\ndients, carbon dioxide was\nmineral springs. Later, Europeans\nreviewed by a group of prominent\ndrank these naturally carbonated\nscientists for the Food and Drug\nwaters for their health.\nAdministration and its safety was\nThe manufacture of car-\nconfirmed. Carbonated soft drinks\nbonated water began in England\nprovide a pleasant way to satisfy\nin 1772 when Joseph Priestley\nthe body's need for liquids. Car-\ndiscovered how to entrap carbon\nbonation also enhances a person's\ndioxide in water. By the 1830s, the\nappreciation of flavor in beverages\nuse and popularity of sparkling\nand accompanying foods. In short,\nwater had spread to America\nit adds to the thirst-quenching sen-\nSoon, with the addition of sweet-\nsation perceived when soft drinks\nare enjoyed.\neners, fruit juices and flavors.\nthese drinks began to be enjoyed\nfor refreshment rather than for\nFor more technical informa-\ntion on carbonated water or\nany medicinal value.\nFrom the time these efferves\nother ingredient-related ques-\ncent soft drinks first began to be\ntions, please write or call:\nmade, the same ingredient that\nmakes them bubble-carbon\nConsumer Information Center\nCoca-cola USA\ndioxide-has been used. Carbon\ndioxide occurs naturally in the at-\nP.O. Drawer 1734\nAtlanta, Georgia 30301\nmosphere as a colorless, odorless\ngas. It is what we breathe out and\n1-800-GET COKE\nwhat plants take in. In soft drinks,\n(438-2653)\ncarbon dioxide produces the dis-\ntinctive \"sparkling\" quality and\nthat \"bubbling\" effect as the drink\nis poured from the container.\nTo carbonate a soft drink,\nbottlers start out by treating ordi-\nConsumer Information Center\nCoca Cola UST\nnary water to improve its appear-\nA Division of The Coca-cola Company\n1/84\nADDITIONAL INFORMATION\nEvaluation of the health aspects of carbon dioxide as a food ingredient\nSpringfield, Virginia: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Infor-\nmation Service, 1980 (NTIS: PB 80 104 615).\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226\n\nQuestion: Who reviewed about the safety of carbon dioxide in food?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "by a group of prominent scientists for the food and drug administration",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
644
|
Which company's consumer information center is given here?
|
Coca-Cola USA
|
Page 12
JEjs1 Mikq1, IERIbjsiti
CARBONATED WATER
IN SOFT DRINKS
ll soft drink products of
The Coca-cola Company
ance, taste and aroma and to
are wholesome beverages pro-
remove certain minerals and im-
duced in compliance with state
purities. Carbon dioxide is then
and federal food laws, and the
dissolved in the treated water in
laws of more than 155 countries
a device known as a carbonator.
where we market our products.
In most modern bottling plants,
treated water, beverage syrup and
Throughout history, people
carbon dioxide are blended
have been fascinated by carbon-
together to make the soft drink.
ated water. The ancient Greeks
Like most other food ingre-
and Romans bathed in natural
dients, carbon dioxide was
mineral springs. Later, Europeans
reviewed by a group of prominent
drank these naturally carbonated
scientists for the Food and Drug
waters for their health.
Administration and its safety was
The manufacture of car-
confirmed. Carbonated soft drinks
bonated water began in England
provide a pleasant way to satisfy
in 1772 when Joseph Priestley
the body's need for liquids. Car-
discovered how to entrap carbon
bonation also enhances a person's
dioxide in water. By the 1830s, the
appreciation of flavor in beverages
use and popularity of sparkling
and accompanying foods. In short,
water had spread to America
it adds to the thirst-quenching sen-
Soon, with the addition of sweet-
sation perceived when soft drinks
are enjoyed.
eners, fruit juices and flavors.
these drinks began to be enjoyed
for refreshment rather than for
For more technical informa-
tion on carbonated water or
any medicinal value.
From the time these efferves
other ingredient-related ques-
cent soft drinks first began to be
tions, please write or call:
made, the same ingredient that
makes them bubble-carbon
Consumer Information Center
Coca-cola USA
dioxide-has been used. Carbon
dioxide occurs naturally in the at-
P.O. Drawer 1734
Atlanta, Georgia 30301
mosphere as a colorless, odorless
gas. It is what we breathe out and
1-800-GET COKE
what plants take in. In soft drinks,
(438-2653)
carbon dioxide produces the dis-
tinctive "sparkling" quality and
that "bubbling" effect as the drink
is poured from the container.
To carbonate a soft drink,
bottlers start out by treating ordi-
Consumer Information Center
Coca Cola UST
nary water to improve its appear-
A Division of The Coca-cola Company
1/84
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Evaluation of the health aspects of carbon dioxide as a food ingredient
Springfield, Virginia: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Infor-
mation Service, 1980 (NTIS: PB 80 104 615).
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 370,
"image": "mtyj0226_12.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mtyj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "12"
}
| 687
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 12\nJEjs1 Mikq1, IERIbjsiti\nCARBONATED WATER\nIN SOFT DRINKS\nll soft drink products of\nThe Coca-cola Company\nance, taste and aroma and to\nare wholesome beverages pro-\nremove certain minerals and im-\nduced in compliance with state\npurities. Carbon dioxide is then\nand federal food laws, and the\ndissolved in the treated water in\nlaws of more than 155 countries\na device known as a carbonator.\nwhere we market our products.\nIn most modern bottling plants,\ntreated water, beverage syrup and\nThroughout history, people\ncarbon dioxide are blended\nhave been fascinated by carbon-\ntogether to make the soft drink.\nated water. The ancient Greeks\nLike most other food ingre-\nand Romans bathed in natural\ndients, carbon dioxide was\nmineral springs. Later, Europeans\nreviewed by a group of prominent\ndrank these naturally carbonated\nscientists for the Food and Drug\nwaters for their health.\nAdministration and its safety was\nThe manufacture of car-\nconfirmed. Carbonated soft drinks\nbonated water began in England\nprovide a pleasant way to satisfy\nin 1772 when Joseph Priestley\nthe body's need for liquids. Car-\ndiscovered how to entrap carbon\nbonation also enhances a person's\ndioxide in water. By the 1830s, the\nappreciation of flavor in beverages\nuse and popularity of sparkling\nand accompanying foods. In short,\nwater had spread to America\nit adds to the thirst-quenching sen-\nSoon, with the addition of sweet-\nsation perceived when soft drinks\nare enjoyed.\neners, fruit juices and flavors.\nthese drinks began to be enjoyed\nfor refreshment rather than for\nFor more technical informa-\ntion on carbonated water or\nany medicinal value.\nFrom the time these efferves\nother ingredient-related ques-\ncent soft drinks first began to be\ntions, please write or call:\nmade, the same ingredient that\nmakes them bubble-carbon\nConsumer Information Center\nCoca-cola USA\ndioxide-has been used. Carbon\ndioxide occurs naturally in the at-\nP.O. Drawer 1734\nAtlanta, Georgia 30301\nmosphere as a colorless, odorless\ngas. It is what we breathe out and\n1-800-GET COKE\nwhat plants take in. In soft drinks,\n(438-2653)\ncarbon dioxide produces the dis-\ntinctive \"sparkling\" quality and\nthat \"bubbling\" effect as the drink\nis poured from the container.\nTo carbonate a soft drink,\nbottlers start out by treating ordi-\nConsumer Information Center\nCoca Cola UST\nnary water to improve its appear-\nA Division of The Coca-cola Company\n1/84\nADDITIONAL INFORMATION\nEvaluation of the health aspects of carbon dioxide as a food ingredient\nSpringfield, Virginia: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Infor-\nmation Service, 1980 (NTIS: PB 80 104 615).\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226\n\nQuestion: Which company's consumer information center is given here?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Coca-Cola USA",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
645
|
what is the average intake of sodium in US ?
|
3,000-5,000 milligrams per day
|
Page 16
ceptibility, obesity and the effects
Soft drinks satisfy both the
of stress, excess sodium may be
a contributing cause of high
physiological need for water
blood pressure in some individ-
and the psychological need for a
refreshing pause from the day's
uals. For more information,
consult your family physician.
activities. Because most soft
The Food and Nutrition
drinks are considered "very low
sodium" foods, they may be
Board of the National Academy of included in virtually everyone's
Sciences has suggested that "Safe
diet, and even those who are on
and Adequate Dietary Intakes"
of sodium for healthy adults are
sodium-restricted diets can enjoy
1,000 to 3,300 milligrams daily.
soft drinks in moderation.
Since sodium is 40 percent of the
weight of ordinary table salt, this
For more technical infor-
mation on sodium or other
is an equivalent of about 1/2 to 11/2
ingredient-related questions,
teaspoons of table salt. But many
healthy people do consume twice
please write or call:
that amount. In fact, the average
Consumer Information Center
intake of sodium in the U.S. is
Coca-cola USA
estimated to be 3,000-5,000
P.O. Drawer 1734
milligrams per day.
Based on national sales
Atlanta, Georgia 30301
estimates, the average U.S. per
1-800-GET COKE
capita daily consumption of soft
(1-800-438-2653)
drinks is approximately two and
one-half six-ounce servings. As
noted above, the majority of the
products of Coca-cola USA con-
tain 35 milligrams or less of
sodium per serving. It would take
Consumer Information
57 such servings to equal the
Center
sodium found in a single tea-
Coca Cola USA
Division of
spoon of salt. It has been esti-
The Coca Cola Company
mated that soft drinks contribute
no more than between 0.5 and 1.0
percent of the approximated daily
intake of sodium.
9/87
ADDITIONAL SOURCES OF INFORMATION ON SODIUM
1. Council on Scientific Affairs. Sodium in Processed Foods. Journal of the
American Medical Association 1983; 249(6):784
2. Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. Life Sciences
Research Office. Evaluation of the health aspects of sodium chloride
and potassium chloride as food ingredients. Springfield, Virginia: U.S.
Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, 1979
(NTIS:PB 289 139).
3. Institute of Food Technologists' Expert Panel on Food Safety and the
Committee on Public Information. Food Technology 1980; 34(1):85.
4. March, A.C. Processes and formulations that affect the sodium content of
foods. Food Technology 1983 July; 37(7):45.
5. National Research Council and National Academy of Sciences. Food and
D.C. 1980.
Nutrition Board. Recommended dietary allowances. 9th ed. Washington,
6. Simopoulos, A.P. The nutritional aspects of hypertension. American
Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1985; 42:909-912.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 371,
"image": "mtyj0226_16.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mtyj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "16"
}
| 758
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 16\nceptibility, obesity and the effects\nSoft drinks satisfy both the\nof stress, excess sodium may be\na contributing cause of high\nphysiological need for water\nblood pressure in some individ-\nand the psychological need for a\nrefreshing pause from the day's\nuals. For more information,\nconsult your family physician.\nactivities. Because most soft\nThe Food and Nutrition\ndrinks are considered \"very low\nsodium\" foods, they may be\nBoard of the National Academy of included in virtually everyone's\nSciences has suggested that \"Safe\ndiet, and even those who are on\nand Adequate Dietary Intakes\"\nof sodium for healthy adults are\nsodium-restricted diets can enjoy\n1,000 to 3,300 milligrams daily.\nsoft drinks in moderation.\nSince sodium is 40 percent of the\nweight of ordinary table salt, this\nFor more technical infor-\nmation on sodium or other\nis an equivalent of about 1/2 to 11/2\ningredient-related questions,\nteaspoons of table salt. But many\nhealthy people do consume twice\nplease write or call:\nthat amount. In fact, the average\nConsumer Information Center\nintake of sodium in the U.S. is\nCoca-cola USA\nestimated to be 3,000-5,000\nP.O. Drawer 1734\nmilligrams per day.\nBased on national sales\nAtlanta, Georgia 30301\nestimates, the average U.S. per\n1-800-GET COKE\ncapita daily consumption of soft\n(1-800-438-2653)\ndrinks is approximately two and\none-half six-ounce servings. As\nnoted above, the majority of the\nproducts of Coca-cola USA con-\ntain 35 milligrams or less of\nsodium per serving. It would take\nConsumer Information\n57 such servings to equal the\nCenter\nsodium found in a single tea-\nCoca Cola USA\nDivision of\nspoon of salt. It has been esti-\nThe Coca Cola Company\nmated that soft drinks contribute\nno more than between 0.5 and 1.0\npercent of the approximated daily\nintake of sodium.\n9/87\nADDITIONAL SOURCES OF INFORMATION ON SODIUM\n1. Council on Scientific Affairs. Sodium in Processed Foods. Journal of the\nAmerican Medical Association 1983; 249(6):784\n2. Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. Life Sciences\nResearch Office. Evaluation of the health aspects of sodium chloride\nand potassium chloride as food ingredients. Springfield, Virginia: U.S.\nDepartment of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, 1979\n(NTIS:PB 289 139).\n3. Institute of Food Technologists' Expert Panel on Food Safety and the\nCommittee on Public Information. Food Technology 1980; 34(1):85.\n4. March, A.C. Processes and formulations that affect the sodium content of\nfoods. Food Technology 1983 July; 37(7):45.\n5. National Research Council and National Academy of Sciences. Food and\nD.C. 1980.\nNutrition Board. Recommended dietary allowances. 9th ed. Washington,\n6. Simopoulos, A.P. The nutritional aspects of hypertension. American\nJournal of Clinical Nutrition 1985; 42:909-912.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226\n\nQuestion: what is the average intake of sodium in US ?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "3,000-5,000 milligrams per day",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
646
|
What is the average U.S per capita consumption of soft drinks based on national sales estimates?
|
is approximately two and one-half six-ounce servings.
|
Page 16
ceptibility, obesity and the effects
Soft drinks satisfy both the
of stress, excess sodium may be
a contributing cause of high
physiological need for water
blood pressure in some individ-
and the psychological need for a
refreshing pause from the day's
uals. For more information,
consult your family physician.
activities. Because most soft
The Food and Nutrition
drinks are considered "very low
sodium" foods, they may be
Board of the National Academy of included in virtually everyone's
Sciences has suggested that "Safe
diet, and even those who are on
and Adequate Dietary Intakes"
of sodium for healthy adults are
sodium-restricted diets can enjoy
1,000 to 3,300 milligrams daily.
soft drinks in moderation.
Since sodium is 40 percent of the
weight of ordinary table salt, this
For more technical infor-
mation on sodium or other
is an equivalent of about 1/2 to 11/2
ingredient-related questions,
teaspoons of table salt. But many
healthy people do consume twice
please write or call:
that amount. In fact, the average
Consumer Information Center
intake of sodium in the U.S. is
Coca-cola USA
estimated to be 3,000-5,000
P.O. Drawer 1734
milligrams per day.
Based on national sales
Atlanta, Georgia 30301
estimates, the average U.S. per
1-800-GET COKE
capita daily consumption of soft
(1-800-438-2653)
drinks is approximately two and
one-half six-ounce servings. As
noted above, the majority of the
products of Coca-cola USA con-
tain 35 milligrams or less of
sodium per serving. It would take
Consumer Information
57 such servings to equal the
Center
sodium found in a single tea-
Coca Cola USA
Division of
spoon of salt. It has been esti-
The Coca Cola Company
mated that soft drinks contribute
no more than between 0.5 and 1.0
percent of the approximated daily
intake of sodium.
9/87
ADDITIONAL SOURCES OF INFORMATION ON SODIUM
1. Council on Scientific Affairs. Sodium in Processed Foods. Journal of the
American Medical Association 1983; 249(6):784
2. Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. Life Sciences
Research Office. Evaluation of the health aspects of sodium chloride
and potassium chloride as food ingredients. Springfield, Virginia: U.S.
Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, 1979
(NTIS:PB 289 139).
3. Institute of Food Technologists' Expert Panel on Food Safety and the
Committee on Public Information. Food Technology 1980; 34(1):85.
4. March, A.C. Processes and formulations that affect the sodium content of
foods. Food Technology 1983 July; 37(7):45.
5. National Research Council and National Academy of Sciences. Food and
D.C. 1980.
Nutrition Board. Recommended dietary allowances. 9th ed. Washington,
6. Simopoulos, A.P. The nutritional aspects of hypertension. American
Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1985; 42:909-912.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 371,
"image": "mtyj0226_16.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mtyj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "16"
}
| 767
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 16\nceptibility, obesity and the effects\nSoft drinks satisfy both the\nof stress, excess sodium may be\na contributing cause of high\nphysiological need for water\nblood pressure in some individ-\nand the psychological need for a\nrefreshing pause from the day's\nuals. For more information,\nconsult your family physician.\nactivities. Because most soft\nThe Food and Nutrition\ndrinks are considered \"very low\nsodium\" foods, they may be\nBoard of the National Academy of included in virtually everyone's\nSciences has suggested that \"Safe\ndiet, and even those who are on\nand Adequate Dietary Intakes\"\nof sodium for healthy adults are\nsodium-restricted diets can enjoy\n1,000 to 3,300 milligrams daily.\nsoft drinks in moderation.\nSince sodium is 40 percent of the\nweight of ordinary table salt, this\nFor more technical infor-\nmation on sodium or other\nis an equivalent of about 1/2 to 11/2\ningredient-related questions,\nteaspoons of table salt. But many\nhealthy people do consume twice\nplease write or call:\nthat amount. In fact, the average\nConsumer Information Center\nintake of sodium in the U.S. is\nCoca-cola USA\nestimated to be 3,000-5,000\nP.O. Drawer 1734\nmilligrams per day.\nBased on national sales\nAtlanta, Georgia 30301\nestimates, the average U.S. per\n1-800-GET COKE\ncapita daily consumption of soft\n(1-800-438-2653)\ndrinks is approximately two and\none-half six-ounce servings. As\nnoted above, the majority of the\nproducts of Coca-cola USA con-\ntain 35 milligrams or less of\nsodium per serving. It would take\nConsumer Information\n57 such servings to equal the\nCenter\nsodium found in a single tea-\nCoca Cola USA\nDivision of\nspoon of salt. It has been esti-\nThe Coca Cola Company\nmated that soft drinks contribute\nno more than between 0.5 and 1.0\npercent of the approximated daily\nintake of sodium.\n9/87\nADDITIONAL SOURCES OF INFORMATION ON SODIUM\n1. Council on Scientific Affairs. Sodium in Processed Foods. Journal of the\nAmerican Medical Association 1983; 249(6):784\n2. Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. Life Sciences\nResearch Office. Evaluation of the health aspects of sodium chloride\nand potassium chloride as food ingredients. Springfield, Virginia: U.S.\nDepartment of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, 1979\n(NTIS:PB 289 139).\n3. Institute of Food Technologists' Expert Panel on Food Safety and the\nCommittee on Public Information. Food Technology 1980; 34(1):85.\n4. March, A.C. Processes and formulations that affect the sodium content of\nfoods. Food Technology 1983 July; 37(7):45.\n5. National Research Council and National Academy of Sciences. Food and\nD.C. 1980.\nNutrition Board. Recommended dietary allowances. 9th ed. Washington,\n6. Simopoulos, A.P. The nutritional aspects of hypertension. American\nJournal of Clinical Nutrition 1985; 42:909-912.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the average U.S per capita consumption of soft drinks based on national sales estimates?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "is approximately two and one-half six-ounce servings.",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
647
|
What is the estimated average intake of sodium per day in the U.S.?
|
is estimated to be 3,000-5,000 milligrams per day.
|
Page 16
ceptibility, obesity and the effects
Soft drinks satisfy both the
of stress, excess sodium may be
a contributing cause of high
physiological need for water
blood pressure in some individ-
and the psychological need for a
refreshing pause from the day's
uals. For more information,
consult your family physician.
activities. Because most soft
The Food and Nutrition
drinks are considered "very low
sodium" foods, they may be
Board of the National Academy of included in virtually everyone's
Sciences has suggested that "Safe
diet, and even those who are on
and Adequate Dietary Intakes"
of sodium for healthy adults are
sodium-restricted diets can enjoy
1,000 to 3,300 milligrams daily.
soft drinks in moderation.
Since sodium is 40 percent of the
weight of ordinary table salt, this
For more technical infor-
mation on sodium or other
is an equivalent of about 1/2 to 11/2
ingredient-related questions,
teaspoons of table salt. But many
healthy people do consume twice
please write or call:
that amount. In fact, the average
Consumer Information Center
intake of sodium in the U.S. is
Coca-cola USA
estimated to be 3,000-5,000
P.O. Drawer 1734
milligrams per day.
Based on national sales
Atlanta, Georgia 30301
estimates, the average U.S. per
1-800-GET COKE
capita daily consumption of soft
(1-800-438-2653)
drinks is approximately two and
one-half six-ounce servings. As
noted above, the majority of the
products of Coca-cola USA con-
tain 35 milligrams or less of
sodium per serving. It would take
Consumer Information
57 such servings to equal the
Center
sodium found in a single tea-
Coca Cola USA
Division of
spoon of salt. It has been esti-
The Coca Cola Company
mated that soft drinks contribute
no more than between 0.5 and 1.0
percent of the approximated daily
intake of sodium.
9/87
ADDITIONAL SOURCES OF INFORMATION ON SODIUM
1. Council on Scientific Affairs. Sodium in Processed Foods. Journal of the
American Medical Association 1983; 249(6):784
2. Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. Life Sciences
Research Office. Evaluation of the health aspects of sodium chloride
and potassium chloride as food ingredients. Springfield, Virginia: U.S.
Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, 1979
(NTIS:PB 289 139).
3. Institute of Food Technologists' Expert Panel on Food Safety and the
Committee on Public Information. Food Technology 1980; 34(1):85.
4. March, A.C. Processes and formulations that affect the sodium content of
foods. Food Technology 1983 July; 37(7):45.
5. National Research Council and National Academy of Sciences. Food and
D.C. 1980.
Nutrition Board. Recommended dietary allowances. 9th ed. Washington,
6. Simopoulos, A.P. The nutritional aspects of hypertension. American
Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1985; 42:909-912.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 371,
"image": "mtyj0226_16.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mtyj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "16"
}
| 769
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 16\nceptibility, obesity and the effects\nSoft drinks satisfy both the\nof stress, excess sodium may be\na contributing cause of high\nphysiological need for water\nblood pressure in some individ-\nand the psychological need for a\nrefreshing pause from the day's\nuals. For more information,\nconsult your family physician.\nactivities. Because most soft\nThe Food and Nutrition\ndrinks are considered \"very low\nsodium\" foods, they may be\nBoard of the National Academy of included in virtually everyone's\nSciences has suggested that \"Safe\ndiet, and even those who are on\nand Adequate Dietary Intakes\"\nof sodium for healthy adults are\nsodium-restricted diets can enjoy\n1,000 to 3,300 milligrams daily.\nsoft drinks in moderation.\nSince sodium is 40 percent of the\nweight of ordinary table salt, this\nFor more technical infor-\nmation on sodium or other\nis an equivalent of about 1/2 to 11/2\ningredient-related questions,\nteaspoons of table salt. But many\nhealthy people do consume twice\nplease write or call:\nthat amount. In fact, the average\nConsumer Information Center\nintake of sodium in the U.S. is\nCoca-cola USA\nestimated to be 3,000-5,000\nP.O. Drawer 1734\nmilligrams per day.\nBased on national sales\nAtlanta, Georgia 30301\nestimates, the average U.S. per\n1-800-GET COKE\ncapita daily consumption of soft\n(1-800-438-2653)\ndrinks is approximately two and\none-half six-ounce servings. As\nnoted above, the majority of the\nproducts of Coca-cola USA con-\ntain 35 milligrams or less of\nsodium per serving. It would take\nConsumer Information\n57 such servings to equal the\nCenter\nsodium found in a single tea-\nCoca Cola USA\nDivision of\nspoon of salt. It has been esti-\nThe Coca Cola Company\nmated that soft drinks contribute\nno more than between 0.5 and 1.0\npercent of the approximated daily\nintake of sodium.\n9/87\nADDITIONAL SOURCES OF INFORMATION ON SODIUM\n1. Council on Scientific Affairs. Sodium in Processed Foods. Journal of the\nAmerican Medical Association 1983; 249(6):784\n2. Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. Life Sciences\nResearch Office. Evaluation of the health aspects of sodium chloride\nand potassium chloride as food ingredients. Springfield, Virginia: U.S.\nDepartment of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, 1979\n(NTIS:PB 289 139).\n3. Institute of Food Technologists' Expert Panel on Food Safety and the\nCommittee on Public Information. Food Technology 1980; 34(1):85.\n4. March, A.C. Processes and formulations that affect the sodium content of\nfoods. Food Technology 1983 July; 37(7):45.\n5. National Research Council and National Academy of Sciences. Food and\nD.C. 1980.\nNutrition Board. Recommended dietary allowances. 9th ed. Washington,\n6. Simopoulos, A.P. The nutritional aspects of hypertension. American\nJournal of Clinical Nutrition 1985; 42:909-912.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the estimated average intake of sodium per day in the U.S.?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "is estimated to be 3,000-5,000 milligrams per day.",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
649
|
what the contact number of consumer information centre?
|
1-800-438-2653
|
Page 16
ceptibility, obesity and the effects
Soft drinks satisfy both the
of stress, excess sodium may be
a contributing cause of high
physiological need for water
blood pressure in some individ-
and the psychological need for a
refreshing pause from the day's
uals. For more information,
consult your family physician.
activities. Because most soft
The Food and Nutrition
drinks are considered "very low
sodium" foods, they may be
Board of the National Academy of included in virtually everyone's
Sciences has suggested that "Safe
diet, and even those who are on
and Adequate Dietary Intakes"
of sodium for healthy adults are
sodium-restricted diets can enjoy
1,000 to 3,300 milligrams daily.
soft drinks in moderation.
Since sodium is 40 percent of the
weight of ordinary table salt, this
For more technical infor-
mation on sodium or other
is an equivalent of about 1/2 to 11/2
ingredient-related questions,
teaspoons of table salt. But many
healthy people do consume twice
please write or call:
that amount. In fact, the average
Consumer Information Center
intake of sodium in the U.S. is
Coca-cola USA
estimated to be 3,000-5,000
P.O. Drawer 1734
milligrams per day.
Based on national sales
Atlanta, Georgia 30301
estimates, the average U.S. per
1-800-GET COKE
capita daily consumption of soft
(1-800-438-2653)
drinks is approximately two and
one-half six-ounce servings. As
noted above, the majority of the
products of Coca-cola USA con-
tain 35 milligrams or less of
sodium per serving. It would take
Consumer Information
57 such servings to equal the
Center
sodium found in a single tea-
Coca Cola USA
Division of
spoon of salt. It has been esti-
The Coca Cola Company
mated that soft drinks contribute
no more than between 0.5 and 1.0
percent of the approximated daily
intake of sodium.
9/87
ADDITIONAL SOURCES OF INFORMATION ON SODIUM
1. Council on Scientific Affairs. Sodium in Processed Foods. Journal of the
American Medical Association 1983; 249(6):784
2. Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. Life Sciences
Research Office. Evaluation of the health aspects of sodium chloride
and potassium chloride as food ingredients. Springfield, Virginia: U.S.
Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, 1979
(NTIS:PB 289 139).
3. Institute of Food Technologists' Expert Panel on Food Safety and the
Committee on Public Information. Food Technology 1980; 34(1):85.
4. March, A.C. Processes and formulations that affect the sodium content of
foods. Food Technology 1983 July; 37(7):45.
5. National Research Council and National Academy of Sciences. Food and
D.C. 1980.
Nutrition Board. Recommended dietary allowances. 9th ed. Washington,
6. Simopoulos, A.P. The nutritional aspects of hypertension. American
Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1985; 42:909-912.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 371,
"image": "mtyj0226_16.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mtyj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "16"
}
| 755
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 16\nceptibility, obesity and the effects\nSoft drinks satisfy both the\nof stress, excess sodium may be\na contributing cause of high\nphysiological need for water\nblood pressure in some individ-\nand the psychological need for a\nrefreshing pause from the day's\nuals. For more information,\nconsult your family physician.\nactivities. Because most soft\nThe Food and Nutrition\ndrinks are considered \"very low\nsodium\" foods, they may be\nBoard of the National Academy of included in virtually everyone's\nSciences has suggested that \"Safe\ndiet, and even those who are on\nand Adequate Dietary Intakes\"\nof sodium for healthy adults are\nsodium-restricted diets can enjoy\n1,000 to 3,300 milligrams daily.\nsoft drinks in moderation.\nSince sodium is 40 percent of the\nweight of ordinary table salt, this\nFor more technical infor-\nmation on sodium or other\nis an equivalent of about 1/2 to 11/2\ningredient-related questions,\nteaspoons of table salt. But many\nhealthy people do consume twice\nplease write or call:\nthat amount. In fact, the average\nConsumer Information Center\nintake of sodium in the U.S. is\nCoca-cola USA\nestimated to be 3,000-5,000\nP.O. Drawer 1734\nmilligrams per day.\nBased on national sales\nAtlanta, Georgia 30301\nestimates, the average U.S. per\n1-800-GET COKE\ncapita daily consumption of soft\n(1-800-438-2653)\ndrinks is approximately two and\none-half six-ounce servings. As\nnoted above, the majority of the\nproducts of Coca-cola USA con-\ntain 35 milligrams or less of\nsodium per serving. It would take\nConsumer Information\n57 such servings to equal the\nCenter\nsodium found in a single tea-\nCoca Cola USA\nDivision of\nspoon of salt. It has been esti-\nThe Coca Cola Company\nmated that soft drinks contribute\nno more than between 0.5 and 1.0\npercent of the approximated daily\nintake of sodium.\n9/87\nADDITIONAL SOURCES OF INFORMATION ON SODIUM\n1. Council on Scientific Affairs. Sodium in Processed Foods. Journal of the\nAmerican Medical Association 1983; 249(6):784\n2. Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. Life Sciences\nResearch Office. Evaluation of the health aspects of sodium chloride\nand potassium chloride as food ingredients. Springfield, Virginia: U.S.\nDepartment of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, 1979\n(NTIS:PB 289 139).\n3. Institute of Food Technologists' Expert Panel on Food Safety and the\nCommittee on Public Information. Food Technology 1980; 34(1):85.\n4. March, A.C. Processes and formulations that affect the sodium content of\nfoods. Food Technology 1983 July; 37(7):45.\n5. National Research Council and National Academy of Sciences. Food and\nD.C. 1980.\nNutrition Board. Recommended dietary allowances. 9th ed. Washington,\n6. Simopoulos, A.P. The nutritional aspects of hypertension. American\nJournal of Clinical Nutrition 1985; 42:909-912.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226\n\nQuestion: what the contact number of consumer information centre?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1-800-438-2653",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
658
|
what is the gross profit in the year 2009?
|
19,902
|
Page 6
Analysis of Consolidated Statements of Income
Percent Change
Year Ended December 31,
2009
2008
2007
2009 vs. 2008 2008 vs. 2007
In millions except percentages and per share data)
NET OPERATING REVENUES
$ 30,990 $ 31,944 $ 28,857
31%
11%
Cost of goods sold
11,088
11.374
10.406
3)
Q
GROSS PROFIT
19.902
20,570
18,451
(3)
11
GROSS PROFIT MARGIN
64.2%
64.4%
63.9%
Selling, general and administrative expenses
11,358
11,774
10.94
(4)
Other operating charges
313
350
254
OPERATING INCOME
8.231
8.446
7,252
(3)
16
OPERATING MARGIN
26.6%
26.4%
25.1%
Interest income
249
333
236
(25)
41
Interest expense
355
438
456
19)
(4)
Equity income (loss) - net
781
(874)
568
Other income (loss) - net
40
30
219
*
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
8,946
7.506
7,919
19
(5)
Income taxes
2.040
,632
1,892
25
(14)
Effective tax rate
22.8%
21.7%
23.9%
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME
5.906
5,874
18
46
(3)
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
82
67
22
16
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO SHAREOWNERS OF
CA-COLA COMPANY
$ 6,824 $ 5,807 $ 5,981
18%
3)%
NET INCOME PER SHARE'
Basic net income per share
2.95
$
2.51
$
2.59
18%
(3)
Diluted net income per share
2.93
2.49
2.57
18%
Calculation is not meaningful.
Basic net income per share and diluted net income per share are calculated based on net income attributable to shareowners of
The Coca-cola Company.
45
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 376,
"image": "mxpj0226_6.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mxpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "6"
}
| 541
|
none
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 6\nAnalysis of Consolidated Statements of Income\nPercent Change\nYear Ended December 31,\n2009\n2008\n2007\n2009 vs. 2008 2008 vs. 2007\nIn millions except percentages and per share data)\nNET OPERATING REVENUES\n$ 30,990 $ 31,944 $ 28,857\n31%\n11%\nCost of goods sold\n11,088\n11.374\n10.406\n3)\nQ\nGROSS PROFIT\n19.902\n20,570\n18,451\n(3)\n11\nGROSS PROFIT MARGIN\n64.2%\n64.4%\n63.9%\nSelling, general and administrative expenses\n11,358\n11,774\n10.94\n(4)\nOther operating charges\n313\n350\n254\nOPERATING INCOME\n8.231\n8.446\n7,252\n(3)\n16\nOPERATING MARGIN\n26.6%\n26.4%\n25.1%\nInterest income\n249\n333\n236\n(25)\n41\nInterest expense\n355\n438\n456\n19)\n(4)\nEquity income (loss) - net\n781\n(874)\n568\nOther income (loss) - net\n40\n30\n219\n*\nINCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES\n8,946\n7.506\n7,919\n19\n(5)\nIncome taxes\n2.040\n,632\n1,892\n25\n(14)\nEffective tax rate\n22.8%\n21.7%\n23.9%\nCONSOLIDATED NET INCOME\n5.906\n5,874\n18\n46\n(3)\nLess: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests\n82\n67\n22\n16\nNET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO SHAREOWNERS OF\nCA-COLA COMPANY\n$ 6,824 $ 5,807 $ 5,981\n18%\n3)%\nNET INCOME PER SHARE'\nBasic net income per share\n2.95\n$\n2.51\n$\n2.59\n18%\n(3)\nDiluted net income per share\n2.93\n2.49\n2.57\n18%\nCalculation is not meaningful.\nBasic net income per share and diluted net income per share are calculated based on net income attributable to shareowners of\nThe Coca-cola Company.\n45\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxpj0226\n\nQuestion: what is the gross profit in the year 2009?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "19,902",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
659
|
what is the income before income tax for the year 2007?
|
7,919
|
Page 6
Analysis of Consolidated Statements of Income
Percent Change
Year Ended December 31,
2009
2008
2007
2009 vs. 2008 2008 vs. 2007
In millions except percentages and per share data)
NET OPERATING REVENUES
$ 30,990 $ 31,944 $ 28,857
31%
11%
Cost of goods sold
11,088
11.374
10.406
3)
Q
GROSS PROFIT
19.902
20,570
18,451
(3)
11
GROSS PROFIT MARGIN
64.2%
64.4%
63.9%
Selling, general and administrative expenses
11,358
11,774
10.94
(4)
Other operating charges
313
350
254
OPERATING INCOME
8.231
8.446
7,252
(3)
16
OPERATING MARGIN
26.6%
26.4%
25.1%
Interest income
249
333
236
(25)
41
Interest expense
355
438
456
19)
(4)
Equity income (loss) - net
781
(874)
568
Other income (loss) - net
40
30
219
*
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
8,946
7.506
7,919
19
(5)
Income taxes
2.040
,632
1,892
25
(14)
Effective tax rate
22.8%
21.7%
23.9%
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME
5.906
5,874
18
46
(3)
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
82
67
22
16
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO SHAREOWNERS OF
CA-COLA COMPANY
$ 6,824 $ 5,807 $ 5,981
18%
3)%
NET INCOME PER SHARE'
Basic net income per share
2.95
$
2.51
$
2.59
18%
(3)
Diluted net income per share
2.93
2.49
2.57
18%
Calculation is not meaningful.
Basic net income per share and diluted net income per share are calculated based on net income attributable to shareowners of
The Coca-cola Company.
45
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 376,
"image": "mxpj0226_6.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mxpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "6"
}
| 544
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 6\nAnalysis of Consolidated Statements of Income\nPercent Change\nYear Ended December 31,\n2009\n2008\n2007\n2009 vs. 2008 2008 vs. 2007\nIn millions except percentages and per share data)\nNET OPERATING REVENUES\n$ 30,990 $ 31,944 $ 28,857\n31%\n11%\nCost of goods sold\n11,088\n11.374\n10.406\n3)\nQ\nGROSS PROFIT\n19.902\n20,570\n18,451\n(3)\n11\nGROSS PROFIT MARGIN\n64.2%\n64.4%\n63.9%\nSelling, general and administrative expenses\n11,358\n11,774\n10.94\n(4)\nOther operating charges\n313\n350\n254\nOPERATING INCOME\n8.231\n8.446\n7,252\n(3)\n16\nOPERATING MARGIN\n26.6%\n26.4%\n25.1%\nInterest income\n249\n333\n236\n(25)\n41\nInterest expense\n355\n438\n456\n19)\n(4)\nEquity income (loss) - net\n781\n(874)\n568\nOther income (loss) - net\n40\n30\n219\n*\nINCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES\n8,946\n7.506\n7,919\n19\n(5)\nIncome taxes\n2.040\n,632\n1,892\n25\n(14)\nEffective tax rate\n22.8%\n21.7%\n23.9%\nCONSOLIDATED NET INCOME\n5.906\n5,874\n18\n46\n(3)\nLess: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests\n82\n67\n22\n16\nNET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO SHAREOWNERS OF\nCA-COLA COMPANY\n$ 6,824 $ 5,807 $ 5,981\n18%\n3)%\nNET INCOME PER SHARE'\nBasic net income per share\n2.95\n$\n2.51\n$\n2.59\n18%\n(3)\nDiluted net income per share\n2.93\n2.49\n2.57\n18%\nCalculation is not meaningful.\nBasic net income per share and diluted net income per share are calculated based on net income attributable to shareowners of\nThe Coca-cola Company.\n45\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxpj0226\n\nQuestion: what is the income before income tax for the year 2007?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "7,919",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
660
|
what is the basic net income per share for 2009 vs 2008
|
18%
|
Page 6
Analysis of Consolidated Statements of Income
Percent Change
Year Ended December 31,
2009
2008
2007
2009 vs. 2008 2008 vs. 2007
In millions except percentages and per share data)
NET OPERATING REVENUES
$ 30,990 $ 31,944 $ 28,857
31%
11%
Cost of goods sold
11,088
11.374
10.406
3)
Q
GROSS PROFIT
19.902
20,570
18,451
(3)
11
GROSS PROFIT MARGIN
64.2%
64.4%
63.9%
Selling, general and administrative expenses
11,358
11,774
10.94
(4)
Other operating charges
313
350
254
OPERATING INCOME
8.231
8.446
7,252
(3)
16
OPERATING MARGIN
26.6%
26.4%
25.1%
Interest income
249
333
236
(25)
41
Interest expense
355
438
456
19)
(4)
Equity income (loss) - net
781
(874)
568
Other income (loss) - net
40
30
219
*
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
8,946
7.506
7,919
19
(5)
Income taxes
2.040
,632
1,892
25
(14)
Effective tax rate
22.8%
21.7%
23.9%
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME
5.906
5,874
18
46
(3)
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
82
67
22
16
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO SHAREOWNERS OF
CA-COLA COMPANY
$ 6,824 $ 5,807 $ 5,981
18%
3)%
NET INCOME PER SHARE'
Basic net income per share
2.95
$
2.51
$
2.59
18%
(3)
Diluted net income per share
2.93
2.49
2.57
18%
Calculation is not meaningful.
Basic net income per share and diluted net income per share are calculated based on net income attributable to shareowners of
The Coca-cola Company.
45
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 376,
"image": "mxpj0226_6.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mxpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "6"
}
| 544
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 6\nAnalysis of Consolidated Statements of Income\nPercent Change\nYear Ended December 31,\n2009\n2008\n2007\n2009 vs. 2008 2008 vs. 2007\nIn millions except percentages and per share data)\nNET OPERATING REVENUES\n$ 30,990 $ 31,944 $ 28,857\n31%\n11%\nCost of goods sold\n11,088\n11.374\n10.406\n3)\nQ\nGROSS PROFIT\n19.902\n20,570\n18,451\n(3)\n11\nGROSS PROFIT MARGIN\n64.2%\n64.4%\n63.9%\nSelling, general and administrative expenses\n11,358\n11,774\n10.94\n(4)\nOther operating charges\n313\n350\n254\nOPERATING INCOME\n8.231\n8.446\n7,252\n(3)\n16\nOPERATING MARGIN\n26.6%\n26.4%\n25.1%\nInterest income\n249\n333\n236\n(25)\n41\nInterest expense\n355\n438\n456\n19)\n(4)\nEquity income (loss) - net\n781\n(874)\n568\nOther income (loss) - net\n40\n30\n219\n*\nINCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES\n8,946\n7.506\n7,919\n19\n(5)\nIncome taxes\n2.040\n,632\n1,892\n25\n(14)\nEffective tax rate\n22.8%\n21.7%\n23.9%\nCONSOLIDATED NET INCOME\n5.906\n5,874\n18\n46\n(3)\nLess: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests\n82\n67\n22\n16\nNET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO SHAREOWNERS OF\nCA-COLA COMPANY\n$ 6,824 $ 5,807 $ 5,981\n18%\n3)%\nNET INCOME PER SHARE'\nBasic net income per share\n2.95\n$\n2.51\n$\n2.59\n18%\n(3)\nDiluted net income per share\n2.93\n2.49\n2.57\n18%\nCalculation is not meaningful.\nBasic net income per share and diluted net income per share are calculated based on net income attributable to shareowners of\nThe Coca-cola Company.\n45\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxpj0226\n\nQuestion: what is the basic net income per share for 2009 vs 2008",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "18%",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
661
|
what is the consolidated net income in the year 2008
|
5,874
|
Page 6
Analysis of Consolidated Statements of Income
Percent Change
Year Ended December 31,
2009
2008
2007
2009 vs. 2008 2008 vs. 2007
In millions except percentages and per share data)
NET OPERATING REVENUES
$ 30,990 $ 31,944 $ 28,857
31%
11%
Cost of goods sold
11,088
11.374
10.406
3)
Q
GROSS PROFIT
19.902
20,570
18,451
(3)
11
GROSS PROFIT MARGIN
64.2%
64.4%
63.9%
Selling, general and administrative expenses
11,358
11,774
10.94
(4)
Other operating charges
313
350
254
OPERATING INCOME
8.231
8.446
7,252
(3)
16
OPERATING MARGIN
26.6%
26.4%
25.1%
Interest income
249
333
236
(25)
41
Interest expense
355
438
456
19)
(4)
Equity income (loss) - net
781
(874)
568
Other income (loss) - net
40
30
219
*
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
8,946
7.506
7,919
19
(5)
Income taxes
2.040
,632
1,892
25
(14)
Effective tax rate
22.8%
21.7%
23.9%
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME
5.906
5,874
18
46
(3)
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
82
67
22
16
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO SHAREOWNERS OF
CA-COLA COMPANY
$ 6,824 $ 5,807 $ 5,981
18%
3)%
NET INCOME PER SHARE'
Basic net income per share
2.95
$
2.51
$
2.59
18%
(3)
Diluted net income per share
2.93
2.49
2.57
18%
Calculation is not meaningful.
Basic net income per share and diluted net income per share are calculated based on net income attributable to shareowners of
The Coca-cola Company.
45
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 376,
"image": "mxpj0226_6.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mxpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "6"
}
| 541
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 6\nAnalysis of Consolidated Statements of Income\nPercent Change\nYear Ended December 31,\n2009\n2008\n2007\n2009 vs. 2008 2008 vs. 2007\nIn millions except percentages and per share data)\nNET OPERATING REVENUES\n$ 30,990 $ 31,944 $ 28,857\n31%\n11%\nCost of goods sold\n11,088\n11.374\n10.406\n3)\nQ\nGROSS PROFIT\n19.902\n20,570\n18,451\n(3)\n11\nGROSS PROFIT MARGIN\n64.2%\n64.4%\n63.9%\nSelling, general and administrative expenses\n11,358\n11,774\n10.94\n(4)\nOther operating charges\n313\n350\n254\nOPERATING INCOME\n8.231\n8.446\n7,252\n(3)\n16\nOPERATING MARGIN\n26.6%\n26.4%\n25.1%\nInterest income\n249\n333\n236\n(25)\n41\nInterest expense\n355\n438\n456\n19)\n(4)\nEquity income (loss) - net\n781\n(874)\n568\nOther income (loss) - net\n40\n30\n219\n*\nINCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES\n8,946\n7.506\n7,919\n19\n(5)\nIncome taxes\n2.040\n,632\n1,892\n25\n(14)\nEffective tax rate\n22.8%\n21.7%\n23.9%\nCONSOLIDATED NET INCOME\n5.906\n5,874\n18\n46\n(3)\nLess: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests\n82\n67\n22\n16\nNET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO SHAREOWNERS OF\nCA-COLA COMPANY\n$ 6,824 $ 5,807 $ 5,981\n18%\n3)%\nNET INCOME PER SHARE'\nBasic net income per share\n2.95\n$\n2.51\n$\n2.59\n18%\n(3)\nDiluted net income per share\n2.93\n2.49\n2.57\n18%\nCalculation is not meaningful.\nBasic net income per share and diluted net income per share are calculated based on net income attributable to shareowners of\nThe Coca-cola Company.\n45\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxpj0226\n\nQuestion: what is the consolidated net income in the year 2008",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "5,874",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
662
|
what is the operating margin in the year 2009
|
26.6%
|
Page 6
Analysis of Consolidated Statements of Income
Percent Change
Year Ended December 31,
2009
2008
2007
2009 vs. 2008 2008 vs. 2007
In millions except percentages and per share data)
NET OPERATING REVENUES
$ 30,990 $ 31,944 $ 28,857
31%
11%
Cost of goods sold
11,088
11.374
10.406
3)
Q
GROSS PROFIT
19.902
20,570
18,451
(3)
11
GROSS PROFIT MARGIN
64.2%
64.4%
63.9%
Selling, general and administrative expenses
11,358
11,774
10.94
(4)
Other operating charges
313
350
254
OPERATING INCOME
8.231
8.446
7,252
(3)
16
OPERATING MARGIN
26.6%
26.4%
25.1%
Interest income
249
333
236
(25)
41
Interest expense
355
438
456
19)
(4)
Equity income (loss) - net
781
(874)
568
Other income (loss) - net
40
30
219
*
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
8,946
7.506
7,919
19
(5)
Income taxes
2.040
,632
1,892
25
(14)
Effective tax rate
22.8%
21.7%
23.9%
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME
5.906
5,874
18
46
(3)
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
82
67
22
16
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO SHAREOWNERS OF
CA-COLA COMPANY
$ 6,824 $ 5,807 $ 5,981
18%
3)%
NET INCOME PER SHARE'
Basic net income per share
2.95
$
2.51
$
2.59
18%
(3)
Diluted net income per share
2.93
2.49
2.57
18%
Calculation is not meaningful.
Basic net income per share and diluted net income per share are calculated based on net income attributable to shareowners of
The Coca-cola Company.
45
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 376,
"image": "mxpj0226_6.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mxpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "6"
}
| 541
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 6\nAnalysis of Consolidated Statements of Income\nPercent Change\nYear Ended December 31,\n2009\n2008\n2007\n2009 vs. 2008 2008 vs. 2007\nIn millions except percentages and per share data)\nNET OPERATING REVENUES\n$ 30,990 $ 31,944 $ 28,857\n31%\n11%\nCost of goods sold\n11,088\n11.374\n10.406\n3)\nQ\nGROSS PROFIT\n19.902\n20,570\n18,451\n(3)\n11\nGROSS PROFIT MARGIN\n64.2%\n64.4%\n63.9%\nSelling, general and administrative expenses\n11,358\n11,774\n10.94\n(4)\nOther operating charges\n313\n350\n254\nOPERATING INCOME\n8.231\n8.446\n7,252\n(3)\n16\nOPERATING MARGIN\n26.6%\n26.4%\n25.1%\nInterest income\n249\n333\n236\n(25)\n41\nInterest expense\n355\n438\n456\n19)\n(4)\nEquity income (loss) - net\n781\n(874)\n568\nOther income (loss) - net\n40\n30\n219\n*\nINCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES\n8,946\n7.506\n7,919\n19\n(5)\nIncome taxes\n2.040\n,632\n1,892\n25\n(14)\nEffective tax rate\n22.8%\n21.7%\n23.9%\nCONSOLIDATED NET INCOME\n5.906\n5,874\n18\n46\n(3)\nLess: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests\n82\n67\n22\n16\nNET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO SHAREOWNERS OF\nCA-COLA COMPANY\n$ 6,824 $ 5,807 $ 5,981\n18%\n3)%\nNET INCOME PER SHARE'\nBasic net income per share\n2.95\n$\n2.51\n$\n2.59\n18%\n(3)\nDiluted net income per share\n2.93\n2.49\n2.57\n18%\nCalculation is not meaningful.\nBasic net income per share and diluted net income per share are calculated based on net income attributable to shareowners of\nThe Coca-cola Company.\n45\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxpj0226\n\nQuestion: what is the operating margin in the year 2009",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "26.6%",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
664
|
To whom, the letter is addressed?
|
Mr. W. Thomas
|
Page 3
Consumer Information Center
Coca Cola USA
Division of
The Coca Cola Company
March 4, 1991
Mr. W. Thomas
1195 N. Vermont
Arlington, VA 22201
Dear Mr. Thomas :
Thank you for contacting us regarding nutritional and educational
material.
Enclosed is the available printed material concerning our products
which should be helpful to you.
Your interest is appreciated.
Sincerely,
Kimberly Boyer
Supervisor
Consumer Correspondence
KB: CW
Enclosures: Ingredients Brochures
P.O. Drawer 1734
Atlanta, GA 30301
1-800-GET COKE
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 378,
"image": "mtyj0226_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mtyj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 178
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nConsumer Information Center\nCoca Cola USA\nDivision of\nThe Coca Cola Company\nMarch 4, 1991\nMr. W. Thomas\n1195 N. Vermont\nArlington, VA 22201\nDear Mr. Thomas :\nThank you for contacting us regarding nutritional and educational\nmaterial.\nEnclosed is the available printed material concerning our products\nwhich should be helpful to you.\nYour interest is appreciated.\nSincerely,\nKimberly Boyer\nSupervisor\nConsumer Correspondence\nKB: CW\nEnclosures: Ingredients Brochures\nP.O. Drawer 1734\nAtlanta, GA 30301\n1-800-GET COKE\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226\n\nQuestion: To whom, the letter is addressed?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Mr. W. Thomas",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
665
|
Who is the consumer correspondence of coca cola USA?
|
kimberly boyer
|
Page 3
Consumer Information Center
Coca Cola USA
Division of
The Coca Cola Company
March 4, 1991
Mr. W. Thomas
1195 N. Vermont
Arlington, VA 22201
Dear Mr. Thomas :
Thank you for contacting us regarding nutritional and educational
material.
Enclosed is the available printed material concerning our products
which should be helpful to you.
Your interest is appreciated.
Sincerely,
Kimberly Boyer
Supervisor
Consumer Correspondence
KB: CW
Enclosures: Ingredients Brochures
P.O. Drawer 1734
Atlanta, GA 30301
1-800-GET COKE
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 378,
"image": "mtyj0226_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mtyj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 181
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nConsumer Information Center\nCoca Cola USA\nDivision of\nThe Coca Cola Company\nMarch 4, 1991\nMr. W. Thomas\n1195 N. Vermont\nArlington, VA 22201\nDear Mr. Thomas :\nThank you for contacting us regarding nutritional and educational\nmaterial.\nEnclosed is the available printed material concerning our products\nwhich should be helpful to you.\nYour interest is appreciated.\nSincerely,\nKimberly Boyer\nSupervisor\nConsumer Correspondence\nKB: CW\nEnclosures: Ingredients Brochures\nP.O. Drawer 1734\nAtlanta, GA 30301\n1-800-GET COKE\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226\n\nQuestion: Who is the consumer correspondence of coca cola USA?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "kimberly boyer",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
667
|
What is the date mentioned in the letter?
|
March 4, 1991
|
Page 3
Consumer Information Center
Coca Cola USA
Division of
The Coca Cola Company
March 4, 1991
Mr. W. Thomas
1195 N. Vermont
Arlington, VA 22201
Dear Mr. Thomas :
Thank you for contacting us regarding nutritional and educational
material.
Enclosed is the available printed material concerning our products
which should be helpful to you.
Your interest is appreciated.
Sincerely,
Kimberly Boyer
Supervisor
Consumer Correspondence
KB: CW
Enclosures: Ingredients Brochures
P.O. Drawer 1734
Atlanta, GA 30301
1-800-GET COKE
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 378,
"image": "mtyj0226_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mtyj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 181
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nConsumer Information Center\nCoca Cola USA\nDivision of\nThe Coca Cola Company\nMarch 4, 1991\nMr. W. Thomas\n1195 N. Vermont\nArlington, VA 22201\nDear Mr. Thomas :\nThank you for contacting us regarding nutritional and educational\nmaterial.\nEnclosed is the available printed material concerning our products\nwhich should be helpful to you.\nYour interest is appreciated.\nSincerely,\nKimberly Boyer\nSupervisor\nConsumer Correspondence\nKB: CW\nEnclosures: Ingredients Brochures\nP.O. Drawer 1734\nAtlanta, GA 30301\n1-800-GET COKE\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the date mentioned in the letter?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "March 4, 1991",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
669
|
whats the name of company ?
|
Shasta Beverages Inc.
|
Page 1
Shasta
BEVERAGES INC.
A CONSOLIDATED FOODS COMPANY . RESPONSIVE TO CONSUMER NEEDS
EXECUTIVE OFFICES
January 14, 1980
Ms. Bonnie Liebman
1755 S Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20009
Dear Ms. Liebman:
Thank you for taking the time to call about your interest in Shasta's
new fructose-sweetened soft drinks.
As requested, I have enclosed some information sheets which will tell
you more about our new product line.
Again, Ms. Liebman, thank you
for letting us know of your interest.
Sincerely ,
Cecil B. Lowry
Vice President Science & Technology
CBL/jc
Enclosures
2690 INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD.inCLASWARD CCAHEPANSINO$146 duTELEPHONE 0405) 283-3200
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 381,
"image": "ykpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "ykpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 214
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nShasta\nBEVERAGES INC.\nA CONSOLIDATED FOODS COMPANY . RESPONSIVE TO CONSUMER NEEDS\nEXECUTIVE OFFICES\nJanuary 14, 1980\nMs. Bonnie Liebman\n1755 S Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20009\nDear Ms. Liebman:\nThank you for taking the time to call about your interest in Shasta's\nnew fructose-sweetened soft drinks.\nAs requested, I have enclosed some information sheets which will tell\nyou more about our new product line.\nAgain, Ms. Liebman, thank you\nfor letting us know of your interest.\nSincerely ,\nCecil B. Lowry\nVice President Science & Technology\nCBL/jc\nEnclosures\n2690 INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD.inCLASWARD CCAHEPANSINO$146 duTELEPHONE 0405) 283-3200\n\nQuestion: whats the name of company ?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Shasta Beverages Inc.",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
670
|
Who is this letter sent to ?
|
Ms. Bonnie Liebman
|
Page 1
Shasta
BEVERAGES INC.
A CONSOLIDATED FOODS COMPANY . RESPONSIVE TO CONSUMER NEEDS
EXECUTIVE OFFICES
January 14, 1980
Ms. Bonnie Liebman
1755 S Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20009
Dear Ms. Liebman:
Thank you for taking the time to call about your interest in Shasta's
new fructose-sweetened soft drinks.
As requested, I have enclosed some information sheets which will tell
you more about our new product line.
Again, Ms. Liebman, thank you
for letting us know of your interest.
Sincerely ,
Cecil B. Lowry
Vice President Science & Technology
CBL/jc
Enclosures
2690 INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD.inCLASWARD CCAHEPANSINO$146 duTELEPHONE 0405) 283-3200
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 381,
"image": "ykpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "ykpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 215
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nShasta\nBEVERAGES INC.\nA CONSOLIDATED FOODS COMPANY . RESPONSIVE TO CONSUMER NEEDS\nEXECUTIVE OFFICES\nJanuary 14, 1980\nMs. Bonnie Liebman\n1755 S Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20009\nDear Ms. Liebman:\nThank you for taking the time to call about your interest in Shasta's\nnew fructose-sweetened soft drinks.\nAs requested, I have enclosed some information sheets which will tell\nyou more about our new product line.\nAgain, Ms. Liebman, thank you\nfor letting us know of your interest.\nSincerely ,\nCecil B. Lowry\nVice President Science & Technology\nCBL/jc\nEnclosures\n2690 INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD.inCLASWARD CCAHEPANSINO$146 duTELEPHONE 0405) 283-3200\n\nQuestion: Who is this letter sent to ?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Ms. Bonnie Liebman",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
672
|
who is the vice president of shasta beverages?
|
Cecil B. Lowry
|
Page 1
Shasta
BEVERAGES INC.
A CONSOLIDATED FOODS COMPANY . RESPONSIVE TO CONSUMER NEEDS
EXECUTIVE OFFICES
January 14, 1980
Ms. Bonnie Liebman
1755 S Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20009
Dear Ms. Liebman:
Thank you for taking the time to call about your interest in Shasta's
new fructose-sweetened soft drinks.
As requested, I have enclosed some information sheets which will tell
you more about our new product line.
Again, Ms. Liebman, thank you
for letting us know of your interest.
Sincerely ,
Cecil B. Lowry
Vice President Science & Technology
CBL/jc
Enclosures
2690 INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD.inCLASWARD CCAHEPANSINO$146 duTELEPHONE 0405) 283-3200
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 381,
"image": "ykpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "ykpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 219
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nShasta\nBEVERAGES INC.\nA CONSOLIDATED FOODS COMPANY . RESPONSIVE TO CONSUMER NEEDS\nEXECUTIVE OFFICES\nJanuary 14, 1980\nMs. Bonnie Liebman\n1755 S Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20009\nDear Ms. Liebman:\nThank you for taking the time to call about your interest in Shasta's\nnew fructose-sweetened soft drinks.\nAs requested, I have enclosed some information sheets which will tell\nyou more about our new product line.\nAgain, Ms. Liebman, thank you\nfor letting us know of your interest.\nSincerely ,\nCecil B. Lowry\nVice President Science & Technology\nCBL/jc\nEnclosures\n2690 INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD.inCLASWARD CCAHEPANSINO$146 duTELEPHONE 0405) 283-3200\n\nQuestion: who is the vice president of shasta beverages?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Cecil B. Lowry",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
673
|
What is the date mentioned in this letter?
|
January 14, 1980
|
Page 1
Shasta
BEVERAGES INC.
A CONSOLIDATED FOODS COMPANY . RESPONSIVE TO CONSUMER NEEDS
EXECUTIVE OFFICES
January 14, 1980
Ms. Bonnie Liebman
1755 S Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20009
Dear Ms. Liebman:
Thank you for taking the time to call about your interest in Shasta's
new fructose-sweetened soft drinks.
As requested, I have enclosed some information sheets which will tell
you more about our new product line.
Again, Ms. Liebman, thank you
for letting us know of your interest.
Sincerely ,
Cecil B. Lowry
Vice President Science & Technology
CBL/jc
Enclosures
2690 INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD.inCLASWARD CCAHEPANSINO$146 duTELEPHONE 0405) 283-3200
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 381,
"image": "ykpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "ykpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 218
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nShasta\nBEVERAGES INC.\nA CONSOLIDATED FOODS COMPANY . RESPONSIVE TO CONSUMER NEEDS\nEXECUTIVE OFFICES\nJanuary 14, 1980\nMs. Bonnie Liebman\n1755 S Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20009\nDear Ms. Liebman:\nThank you for taking the time to call about your interest in Shasta's\nnew fructose-sweetened soft drinks.\nAs requested, I have enclosed some information sheets which will tell\nyou more about our new product line.\nAgain, Ms. Liebman, thank you\nfor letting us know of your interest.\nSincerely ,\nCecil B. Lowry\nVice President Science & Technology\nCBL/jc\nEnclosures\n2690 INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD.inCLASWARD CCAHEPANSINO$146 duTELEPHONE 0405) 283-3200\n\nQuestion: What is the date mentioned in this letter?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "January 14, 1980",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
684
|
Who has written the comments?
|
Michael f. brown and richard l. frank
|
Page 1
COMMENTS ON BEHALF OF
THE AMERICAN FROZEN FOOD INSTITUTE
ON H. R. 10358
BEFORE THE
HOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE ON
HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT
by
Michael F. Brown
and
Richard L. Frank
July 17 , 1978
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/ghpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 384,
"image": "ghpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "ghpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 110
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nCOMMENTS ON BEHALF OF\nTHE AMERICAN FROZEN FOOD INSTITUTE\nON H. R. 10358\nBEFORE THE\nHOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE ON\nHEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT\nby\nMichael F. Brown\nand\nRichard L. Frank\nJuly 17 , 1978\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/ghpj0226\n\nQuestion: Who has written the comments?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Michael f. brown and richard l. frank",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
685
|
what is the name of the food institute
|
the american frozen food institute
|
Page 1
COMMENTS ON BEHALF OF
THE AMERICAN FROZEN FOOD INSTITUTE
ON H. R. 10358
BEFORE THE
HOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE ON
HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT
by
Michael F. Brown
and
Richard L. Frank
July 17 , 1978
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/ghpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 384,
"image": "ghpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "ghpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 107
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nCOMMENTS ON BEHALF OF\nTHE AMERICAN FROZEN FOOD INSTITUTE\nON H. R. 10358\nBEFORE THE\nHOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE ON\nHEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT\nby\nMichael F. Brown\nand\nRichard L. Frank\nJuly 17 , 1978\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/ghpj0226\n\nQuestion: what is the name of the food institute",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "the american frozen food institute",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
687
|
What is the date mentioned in the document?
|
July 17 , 1978
|
Page 1
COMMENTS ON BEHALF OF
THE AMERICAN FROZEN FOOD INSTITUTE
ON H. R. 10358
BEFORE THE
HOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE ON
HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT
by
Michael F. Brown
and
Richard L. Frank
July 17 , 1978
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/ghpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 384,
"image": "ghpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "ghpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 110
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nCOMMENTS ON BEHALF OF\nTHE AMERICAN FROZEN FOOD INSTITUTE\nON H. R. 10358\nBEFORE THE\nHOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE ON\nHEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT\nby\nMichael F. Brown\nand\nRichard L. Frank\nJuly 17 , 1978\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/ghpj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the date mentioned in the document?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "July 17 , 1978",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
690
|
what does the phosphoric acid contain ?
|
mineral phosphorous
|
Page 13
YOU ASKED ABOUT
PHJatSENIORML ACT
IN SOFT DRINKS
l soft drink products of
1. The Coca-cola Company
and grains providing the greatest
amounts.
are wholesome beverages pro-
Contrary to what many peo-
duced in compliance with state
ple believe, soft drinks are not the
and federal food laws, and the
major contributors to the total
laws of more than 155 countries
daily intake of phosphorus. None
where we market our products.
of the phosphorus-containing soft
Phosphoric acid is an ingre-
drinks of The Coca-cola Company
provides more than 30 milligrams
dient which contributes to the
of phosphorus in a six-ounce serv-
tangy taste of "cola type" soft
ing. In terms of the daily diet, a
drinks, just as the citric acid found soft drink accounts for a very
in lemons and oranges enhances
small amount of the total phos-
the flavor of lemonade and orange phorus consumed.
juice.
Another question sometimes
Phosphoric acid contains
the mineral phosphorus, which is
asked about phosphoric acid in
soft drinks is whether it causes
an essential nutrient in the diet
teeth to erode or dissolve. This
and which is present in every cell
concern arises because many peo-
of the body. In addition to con-
ple have seen demonstrations in
tributing to the growth and main-
which a tooth erodes or dissolves
tenance of bones and teeth, phos-
after being immersed in a soft
phorus allows the body to use
drink for several days. Unfor-
other nutrients more effectively,
tunately, these experiments do not
particularly in the conversion
demonstrate what actually hap-
of proteins, carbohydrates and
pens in the mouth and only serve
fats to energy.
Nearly all foods contain
to alarm people unnecessarily.
When a tooth is placed in any
phosphorus. According to recent
acidic solution, such as a soft drink
surveys, Americans consume an
or a fruit juice, and is left there for
average of 1200-1600 milligrams
a number of days, erosion will
of phosphorus per day, with milk
take place. But this is not what
products, meats, meat substitutes
happens in the mouth. In the
(over)
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 385,
"image": "mtyj0226_13.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mtyj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "13"
}
| 553
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 13\nYOU ASKED ABOUT\nPHJatSENIORML ACT\nIN SOFT DRINKS\nl soft drink products of\n1. The Coca-cola Company\nand grains providing the greatest\namounts.\nare wholesome beverages pro-\nContrary to what many peo-\nduced in compliance with state\nple believe, soft drinks are not the\nand federal food laws, and the\nmajor contributors to the total\nlaws of more than 155 countries\ndaily intake of phosphorus. None\nwhere we market our products.\nof the phosphorus-containing soft\nPhosphoric acid is an ingre-\ndrinks of The Coca-cola Company\nprovides more than 30 milligrams\ndient which contributes to the\nof phosphorus in a six-ounce serv-\ntangy taste of \"cola type\" soft\ning. In terms of the daily diet, a\ndrinks, just as the citric acid found soft drink accounts for a very\nin lemons and oranges enhances\nsmall amount of the total phos-\nthe flavor of lemonade and orange phorus consumed.\njuice.\nAnother question sometimes\nPhosphoric acid contains\nthe mineral phosphorus, which is\nasked about phosphoric acid in\nsoft drinks is whether it causes\nan essential nutrient in the diet\nteeth to erode or dissolve. This\nand which is present in every cell\nconcern arises because many peo-\nof the body. In addition to con-\nple have seen demonstrations in\ntributing to the growth and main-\nwhich a tooth erodes or dissolves\ntenance of bones and teeth, phos-\nafter being immersed in a soft\nphorus allows the body to use\ndrink for several days. Unfor-\nother nutrients more effectively,\ntunately, these experiments do not\nparticularly in the conversion\ndemonstrate what actually hap-\nof proteins, carbohydrates and\npens in the mouth and only serve\nfats to energy.\nNearly all foods contain\nto alarm people unnecessarily.\nWhen a tooth is placed in any\nphosphorus. According to recent\nacidic solution, such as a soft drink\nsurveys, Americans consume an\nor a fruit juice, and is left there for\naverage of 1200-1600 milligrams\na number of days, erosion will\nof phosphorus per day, with milk\ntake place. But this is not what\nproducts, meats, meat substitutes\nhappens in the mouth. In the\n(over)\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226\n\nQuestion: what does the phosphoric acid contain ?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "mineral phosphorous",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
691
|
how many milligrams americans consume phosphorus per day
|
1200-1600 milligrams
|
Page 13
YOU ASKED ABOUT
PHJatSENIORML ACT
IN SOFT DRINKS
l soft drink products of
1. The Coca-cola Company
and grains providing the greatest
amounts.
are wholesome beverages pro-
Contrary to what many peo-
duced in compliance with state
ple believe, soft drinks are not the
and federal food laws, and the
major contributors to the total
laws of more than 155 countries
daily intake of phosphorus. None
where we market our products.
of the phosphorus-containing soft
Phosphoric acid is an ingre-
drinks of The Coca-cola Company
provides more than 30 milligrams
dient which contributes to the
of phosphorus in a six-ounce serv-
tangy taste of "cola type" soft
ing. In terms of the daily diet, a
drinks, just as the citric acid found soft drink accounts for a very
in lemons and oranges enhances
small amount of the total phos-
the flavor of lemonade and orange phorus consumed.
juice.
Another question sometimes
Phosphoric acid contains
the mineral phosphorus, which is
asked about phosphoric acid in
soft drinks is whether it causes
an essential nutrient in the diet
teeth to erode or dissolve. This
and which is present in every cell
concern arises because many peo-
of the body. In addition to con-
ple have seen demonstrations in
tributing to the growth and main-
which a tooth erodes or dissolves
tenance of bones and teeth, phos-
after being immersed in a soft
phorus allows the body to use
drink for several days. Unfor-
other nutrients more effectively,
tunately, these experiments do not
particularly in the conversion
demonstrate what actually hap-
of proteins, carbohydrates and
pens in the mouth and only serve
fats to energy.
Nearly all foods contain
to alarm people unnecessarily.
When a tooth is placed in any
phosphorus. According to recent
acidic solution, such as a soft drink
surveys, Americans consume an
or a fruit juice, and is left there for
average of 1200-1600 milligrams
a number of days, erosion will
of phosphorus per day, with milk
take place. But this is not what
products, meats, meat substitutes
happens in the mouth. In the
(over)
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 385,
"image": "mtyj0226_13.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mtyj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "13"
}
| 559
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 13\nYOU ASKED ABOUT\nPHJatSENIORML ACT\nIN SOFT DRINKS\nl soft drink products of\n1. The Coca-cola Company\nand grains providing the greatest\namounts.\nare wholesome beverages pro-\nContrary to what many peo-\nduced in compliance with state\nple believe, soft drinks are not the\nand federal food laws, and the\nmajor contributors to the total\nlaws of more than 155 countries\ndaily intake of phosphorus. None\nwhere we market our products.\nof the phosphorus-containing soft\nPhosphoric acid is an ingre-\ndrinks of The Coca-cola Company\nprovides more than 30 milligrams\ndient which contributes to the\nof phosphorus in a six-ounce serv-\ntangy taste of \"cola type\" soft\ning. In terms of the daily diet, a\ndrinks, just as the citric acid found soft drink accounts for a very\nin lemons and oranges enhances\nsmall amount of the total phos-\nthe flavor of lemonade and orange phorus consumed.\njuice.\nAnother question sometimes\nPhosphoric acid contains\nthe mineral phosphorus, which is\nasked about phosphoric acid in\nsoft drinks is whether it causes\nan essential nutrient in the diet\nteeth to erode or dissolve. This\nand which is present in every cell\nconcern arises because many peo-\nof the body. In addition to con-\nple have seen demonstrations in\ntributing to the growth and main-\nwhich a tooth erodes or dissolves\ntenance of bones and teeth, phos-\nafter being immersed in a soft\nphorus allows the body to use\ndrink for several days. Unfor-\nother nutrients more effectively,\ntunately, these experiments do not\nparticularly in the conversion\ndemonstrate what actually hap-\nof proteins, carbohydrates and\npens in the mouth and only serve\nfats to energy.\nNearly all foods contain\nto alarm people unnecessarily.\nWhen a tooth is placed in any\nphosphorus. According to recent\nacidic solution, such as a soft drink\nsurveys, Americans consume an\nor a fruit juice, and is left there for\naverage of 1200-1600 milligrams\na number of days, erosion will\nof phosphorus per day, with milk\ntake place. But this is not what\nproducts, meats, meat substitutes\nhappens in the mouth. In the\n(over)\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226\n\nQuestion: how many milligrams americans consume phosphorus per day",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1200-1600 milligrams",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
692
|
What happens when a tooth is placed in an acid solution & is left there for a number of days?
|
erosion will take place.
|
Page 13
YOU ASKED ABOUT
PHJatSENIORML ACT
IN SOFT DRINKS
l soft drink products of
1. The Coca-cola Company
and grains providing the greatest
amounts.
are wholesome beverages pro-
Contrary to what many peo-
duced in compliance with state
ple believe, soft drinks are not the
and federal food laws, and the
major contributors to the total
laws of more than 155 countries
daily intake of phosphorus. None
where we market our products.
of the phosphorus-containing soft
Phosphoric acid is an ingre-
drinks of The Coca-cola Company
provides more than 30 milligrams
dient which contributes to the
of phosphorus in a six-ounce serv-
tangy taste of "cola type" soft
ing. In terms of the daily diet, a
drinks, just as the citric acid found soft drink accounts for a very
in lemons and oranges enhances
small amount of the total phos-
the flavor of lemonade and orange phorus consumed.
juice.
Another question sometimes
Phosphoric acid contains
the mineral phosphorus, which is
asked about phosphoric acid in
soft drinks is whether it causes
an essential nutrient in the diet
teeth to erode or dissolve. This
and which is present in every cell
concern arises because many peo-
of the body. In addition to con-
ple have seen demonstrations in
tributing to the growth and main-
which a tooth erodes or dissolves
tenance of bones and teeth, phos-
after being immersed in a soft
phorus allows the body to use
drink for several days. Unfor-
other nutrients more effectively,
tunately, these experiments do not
particularly in the conversion
demonstrate what actually hap-
of proteins, carbohydrates and
pens in the mouth and only serve
fats to energy.
Nearly all foods contain
to alarm people unnecessarily.
When a tooth is placed in any
phosphorus. According to recent
acidic solution, such as a soft drink
surveys, Americans consume an
or a fruit juice, and is left there for
average of 1200-1600 milligrams
a number of days, erosion will
of phosphorus per day, with milk
take place. But this is not what
products, meats, meat substitutes
happens in the mouth. In the
(over)
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 385,
"image": "mtyj0226_13.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mtyj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "13"
}
| 568
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 13\nYOU ASKED ABOUT\nPHJatSENIORML ACT\nIN SOFT DRINKS\nl soft drink products of\n1. The Coca-cola Company\nand grains providing the greatest\namounts.\nare wholesome beverages pro-\nContrary to what many peo-\nduced in compliance with state\nple believe, soft drinks are not the\nand federal food laws, and the\nmajor contributors to the total\nlaws of more than 155 countries\ndaily intake of phosphorus. None\nwhere we market our products.\nof the phosphorus-containing soft\nPhosphoric acid is an ingre-\ndrinks of The Coca-cola Company\nprovides more than 30 milligrams\ndient which contributes to the\nof phosphorus in a six-ounce serv-\ntangy taste of \"cola type\" soft\ning. In terms of the daily diet, a\ndrinks, just as the citric acid found soft drink accounts for a very\nin lemons and oranges enhances\nsmall amount of the total phos-\nthe flavor of lemonade and orange phorus consumed.\njuice.\nAnother question sometimes\nPhosphoric acid contains\nthe mineral phosphorus, which is\nasked about phosphoric acid in\nsoft drinks is whether it causes\nan essential nutrient in the diet\nteeth to erode or dissolve. This\nand which is present in every cell\nconcern arises because many peo-\nof the body. In addition to con-\nple have seen demonstrations in\ntributing to the growth and main-\nwhich a tooth erodes or dissolves\ntenance of bones and teeth, phos-\nafter being immersed in a soft\nphorus allows the body to use\ndrink for several days. Unfor-\nother nutrients more effectively,\ntunately, these experiments do not\nparticularly in the conversion\ndemonstrate what actually hap-\nof proteins, carbohydrates and\npens in the mouth and only serve\nfats to energy.\nNearly all foods contain\nto alarm people unnecessarily.\nWhen a tooth is placed in any\nphosphorus. According to recent\nacidic solution, such as a soft drink\nsurveys, Americans consume an\nor a fruit juice, and is left there for\naverage of 1200-1600 milligrams\na number of days, erosion will\nof phosphorus per day, with milk\ntake place. But this is not what\nproducts, meats, meat substitutes\nhappens in the mouth. In the\n(over)\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226\n\nQuestion: What happens when a tooth is placed in an acid solution & is left there for a number of days?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "erosion will take place.",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
693
|
On which date this statement was passed?
|
June 9, 1978
|
Page 1
STATEMENT OF
ROBERT O. NESHEIM, PH.D.
VICE PRESIDENT, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
THE QUAKER OATS COMPANY
for the
GROCERY MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA, INC.
before the
SUBCOMMITTEE ON HEALTH AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RESOURCES
UNITED STATES SENATE
WASHINGTON, D.C.
on
TITLE III OF S. 3115
JUNE 9, 1978
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fhpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 386,
"image": "fhpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "fhpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 145
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nSTATEMENT OF\nROBERT O. NESHEIM, PH.D.\nVICE PRESIDENT, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY\nTHE QUAKER OATS COMPANY\nfor the\nGROCERY MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA, INC.\nbefore the\nSUBCOMMITTEE ON HEALTH AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH\nCOMMITTEE ON HUMAN RESOURCES\nUNITED STATES SENATE\nWASHINGTON, D.C.\non\nTITLE III OF S. 3115\nJUNE 9, 1978\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fhpj0226\n\nQuestion: On which date this statement was passed?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "June 9, 1978",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
694
|
who is the vice president of the quaker oats company?
|
robert o. nesheim
|
Page 1
STATEMENT OF
ROBERT O. NESHEIM, PH.D.
VICE PRESIDENT, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
THE QUAKER OATS COMPANY
for the
GROCERY MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA, INC.
before the
SUBCOMMITTEE ON HEALTH AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RESOURCES
UNITED STATES SENATE
WASHINGTON, D.C.
on
TITLE III OF S. 3115
JUNE 9, 1978
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fhpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 386,
"image": "fhpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "fhpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 149
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nSTATEMENT OF\nROBERT O. NESHEIM, PH.D.\nVICE PRESIDENT, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY\nTHE QUAKER OATS COMPANY\nfor the\nGROCERY MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA, INC.\nbefore the\nSUBCOMMITTEE ON HEALTH AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH\nCOMMITTEE ON HUMAN RESOURCES\nUNITED STATES SENATE\nWASHINGTON, D.C.\non\nTITLE III OF S. 3115\nJUNE 9, 1978\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fhpj0226\n\nQuestion: who is the vice president of the quaker oats company?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "robert o. nesheim",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
695
|
What was the subcommitteeon?
|
health and scientific research
|
Page 1
STATEMENT OF
ROBERT O. NESHEIM, PH.D.
VICE PRESIDENT, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
THE QUAKER OATS COMPANY
for the
GROCERY MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA, INC.
before the
SUBCOMMITTEE ON HEALTH AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RESOURCES
UNITED STATES SENATE
WASHINGTON, D.C.
on
TITLE III OF S. 3115
JUNE 9, 1978
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fhpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 386,
"image": "fhpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "fhpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 141
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nSTATEMENT OF\nROBERT O. NESHEIM, PH.D.\nVICE PRESIDENT, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY\nTHE QUAKER OATS COMPANY\nfor the\nGROCERY MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA, INC.\nbefore the\nSUBCOMMITTEE ON HEALTH AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH\nCOMMITTEE ON HUMAN RESOURCES\nUNITED STATES SENATE\nWASHINGTON, D.C.\non\nTITLE III OF S. 3115\nJUNE 9, 1978\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fhpj0226\n\nQuestion: What was the subcommitteeon?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "health and scientific research",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
696
|
What is the date mentioned in the document?
|
JUNE 9, 1978
|
Page 1
STATEMENT OF
ROBERT O. NESHEIM, PH.D.
VICE PRESIDENT, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
THE QUAKER OATS COMPANY
for the
GROCERY MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA, INC.
before the
SUBCOMMITTEE ON HEALTH AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RESOURCES
UNITED STATES SENATE
WASHINGTON, D.C.
on
TITLE III OF S. 3115
JUNE 9, 1978
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fhpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 386,
"image": "fhpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "fhpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 147
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nSTATEMENT OF\nROBERT O. NESHEIM, PH.D.\nVICE PRESIDENT, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY\nTHE QUAKER OATS COMPANY\nfor the\nGROCERY MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA, INC.\nbefore the\nSUBCOMMITTEE ON HEALTH AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH\nCOMMITTEE ON HUMAN RESOURCES\nUNITED STATES SENATE\nWASHINGTON, D.C.\non\nTITLE III OF S. 3115\nJUNE 9, 1978\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fhpj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the date mentioned in the document?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "JUNE 9, 1978",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
698
|
which country is benefited from the successful integration of jugos de valle?
|
Latin America
|
Page 8
The favorable impact of currency fluctuations increased net operating revenues by approximately 2 percent. The
favorable impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates was primarily due to a weaker U.S. dollar compared to
certain other foreign currencies, including the Japanese yen, Mexican peso, Brazilian real, South African rand and
Australian dollar, which had a favorable impact on the Eurasia and Africa, Latin America, Pacific and Bottling
Investments operating segments. The favorable impact of a weaker U.S. dollar compared to the aforementioned
currencies was partially offset by the impact of a stronger U.S. dollar compared to certain other foreign currencies,
including the euro and British pound, which had an unfavorable impact on the Europe and Bottling Investments
operating segments. Refer to the heading "Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Position - Foreign Exchange."
Year Ended December 31, 2009, versus Year Ended December 31, 2008
Net operating revenues decreased by $954 million, or 3 percent. The following table illustrates, on a percentage basis,
the estimated impact of key factors resulting in the increase (decrease) in net operating revenues by operating segment:
Percent Change 2009 vs. 200
Volume1
Structural
changes
Price, product &
geographic mix
Currency
fluctuations
Total
Consolidated
3%
1)%
-%
5)%
(3)%
Eurasia & Africa
5%
-%
(11)%
6%
Europe
(2)
(9
(10)
Latin America
7
*cell
(15)
1
North America
Pacific
Bottling Investments
(7)
Corporate
* Calculation is not meaningful.
Represents the percent change in net operating revenues attributable to the increase (decrease) in concentrate sales volume for our
geographic operating segments (expressed in equivalent unit cases). For our Bottling Investments operating segment, this represents
the percent change in net operating revenues attributable to the increase ( decrease) in unit case volume for the Bottling
Investments operating segment after considering the impact of structural changes. Our Bottling Investments operating segment data
reflects unit case volume growth for consolidated bottlers only. Refer to the heading "Beverage Volume," above.
Refer to the heading "Beverage Volume," above, for additional information related to changes in our unit case and
concentrate sales volume.
Structural changes accounted for approximately 1 percent of the decrease in net operating revenues. This decrease was
primarily attributable to the sale of certain bottling operations during 2008, including Remil and a portion of our
ownership interest in Coca-cola Pakistan, which resulted in its deconsolidation. Refer to the heading "Operations
Review - Other Income (Loss) - Net" and Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Price, product and geographic mix had a net zero percent impact on consolidated net operating revenues. Price, product
and geographic mix for our operating segments was impacted by a variety of factors and events including, but not
limited to, the following:
. consolidated results were unfavorably impacted by shifts in our marketing and media spend strategies. The shift
in our marketing and media spend strategies was primarily due to spending more marketing dollars toward
in-store activations, loyalty points programs and point-of-sale marketing. Many of these strategies impact net
revenues instead of marketing expenses. Refer to the heading "Selling, General and Administrative Expenses,"
below;
. consolidated results were unfavorably impacted by geographic mix as a result of growth in our emerging and
developing markets. The growth in our emerging and developing markets resulted in unfavorable geographic mix
due to the fact that the revenue per unit sold in these markets is generally less than in developed markets;
. Latin America benefited from the successful integration of Jugos del Valle. Refer to the heading "Beverage
Volume," above;
60
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lxpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 387,
"image": "lxpj0226_8.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "lxpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "8"
}
| 845
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 8\nThe favorable impact of currency fluctuations increased net operating revenues by approximately 2 percent. The\nfavorable impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates was primarily due to a weaker U.S. dollar compared to\ncertain other foreign currencies, including the Japanese yen, Mexican peso, Brazilian real, South African rand and\nAustralian dollar, which had a favorable impact on the Eurasia and Africa, Latin America, Pacific and Bottling\nInvestments operating segments. The favorable impact of a weaker U.S. dollar compared to the aforementioned\ncurrencies was partially offset by the impact of a stronger U.S. dollar compared to certain other foreign currencies,\nincluding the euro and British pound, which had an unfavorable impact on the Europe and Bottling Investments\noperating segments. Refer to the heading \"Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Position - Foreign Exchange.\"\nYear Ended December 31, 2009, versus Year Ended December 31, 2008\nNet operating revenues decreased by $954 million, or 3 percent. The following table illustrates, on a percentage basis,\nthe estimated impact of key factors resulting in the increase (decrease) in net operating revenues by operating segment:\nPercent Change 2009 vs. 200\nVolume1\nStructural\nchanges\nPrice, product &\ngeographic mix\nCurrency\nfluctuations\nTotal\nConsolidated\n3%\n1)%\n-%\n5)%\n(3)%\nEurasia & Africa\n5%\n-%\n(11)%\n6%\nEurope\n(2)\n(9\n(10)\nLatin America\n7\n*cell\n(15)\n1\nNorth America\nPacific\nBottling Investments\n(7)\nCorporate\n* Calculation is not meaningful.\nRepresents the percent change in net operating revenues attributable to the increase (decrease) in concentrate sales volume for our\ngeographic operating segments (expressed in equivalent unit cases). For our Bottling Investments operating segment, this represents\nthe percent change in net operating revenues attributable to the increase ( decrease) in unit case volume for the Bottling\nInvestments operating segment after considering the impact of structural changes. Our Bottling Investments operating segment data\nreflects unit case volume growth for consolidated bottlers only. Refer to the heading \"Beverage Volume,\" above.\nRefer to the heading \"Beverage Volume,\" above, for additional information related to changes in our unit case and\nconcentrate sales volume.\nStructural changes accounted for approximately 1 percent of the decrease in net operating revenues. This decrease was\nprimarily attributable to the sale of certain bottling operations during 2008, including Remil and a portion of our\nownership interest in Coca-cola Pakistan, which resulted in its deconsolidation. Refer to the heading \"Operations\nReview - Other Income (Loss) - Net\" and Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.\nPrice, product and geographic mix had a net zero percent impact on consolidated net operating revenues. Price, product\nand geographic mix for our operating segments was impacted by a variety of factors and events including, but not\nlimited to, the following:\n. consolidated results were unfavorably impacted by shifts in our marketing and media spend strategies. The shift\nin our marketing and media spend strategies was primarily due to spending more marketing dollars toward\nin-store activations, loyalty points programs and point-of-sale marketing. Many of these strategies impact net\nrevenues instead of marketing expenses. Refer to the heading \"Selling, General and Administrative Expenses,\"\nbelow;\n. consolidated results were unfavorably impacted by geographic mix as a result of growth in our emerging and\ndeveloping markets. The growth in our emerging and developing markets resulted in unfavorable geographic mix\ndue to the fact that the revenue per unit sold in these markets is generally less than in developed markets;\n. Latin America benefited from the successful integration of Jugos del Valle. Refer to the heading \"Beverage\nVolume,\" above;\n60\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lxpj0226\n\nQuestion: which country is benefited from the successful integration of jugos de valle?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Latin America",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
700
|
What is the increase in net operating revenues as part of favorable impact of currency fluctuations?
|
by approximately 2 percent.
|
Page 8
The favorable impact of currency fluctuations increased net operating revenues by approximately 2 percent. The
favorable impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates was primarily due to a weaker U.S. dollar compared to
certain other foreign currencies, including the Japanese yen, Mexican peso, Brazilian real, South African rand and
Australian dollar, which had a favorable impact on the Eurasia and Africa, Latin America, Pacific and Bottling
Investments operating segments. The favorable impact of a weaker U.S. dollar compared to the aforementioned
currencies was partially offset by the impact of a stronger U.S. dollar compared to certain other foreign currencies,
including the euro and British pound, which had an unfavorable impact on the Europe and Bottling Investments
operating segments. Refer to the heading "Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Position - Foreign Exchange."
Year Ended December 31, 2009, versus Year Ended December 31, 2008
Net operating revenues decreased by $954 million, or 3 percent. The following table illustrates, on a percentage basis,
the estimated impact of key factors resulting in the increase (decrease) in net operating revenues by operating segment:
Percent Change 2009 vs. 200
Volume1
Structural
changes
Price, product &
geographic mix
Currency
fluctuations
Total
Consolidated
3%
1)%
-%
5)%
(3)%
Eurasia & Africa
5%
-%
(11)%
6%
Europe
(2)
(9
(10)
Latin America
7
*cell
(15)
1
North America
Pacific
Bottling Investments
(7)
Corporate
* Calculation is not meaningful.
Represents the percent change in net operating revenues attributable to the increase (decrease) in concentrate sales volume for our
geographic operating segments (expressed in equivalent unit cases). For our Bottling Investments operating segment, this represents
the percent change in net operating revenues attributable to the increase ( decrease) in unit case volume for the Bottling
Investments operating segment after considering the impact of structural changes. Our Bottling Investments operating segment data
reflects unit case volume growth for consolidated bottlers only. Refer to the heading "Beverage Volume," above.
Refer to the heading "Beverage Volume," above, for additional information related to changes in our unit case and
concentrate sales volume.
Structural changes accounted for approximately 1 percent of the decrease in net operating revenues. This decrease was
primarily attributable to the sale of certain bottling operations during 2008, including Remil and a portion of our
ownership interest in Coca-cola Pakistan, which resulted in its deconsolidation. Refer to the heading "Operations
Review - Other Income (Loss) - Net" and Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Price, product and geographic mix had a net zero percent impact on consolidated net operating revenues. Price, product
and geographic mix for our operating segments was impacted by a variety of factors and events including, but not
limited to, the following:
. consolidated results were unfavorably impacted by shifts in our marketing and media spend strategies. The shift
in our marketing and media spend strategies was primarily due to spending more marketing dollars toward
in-store activations, loyalty points programs and point-of-sale marketing. Many of these strategies impact net
revenues instead of marketing expenses. Refer to the heading "Selling, General and Administrative Expenses,"
below;
. consolidated results were unfavorably impacted by geographic mix as a result of growth in our emerging and
developing markets. The growth in our emerging and developing markets resulted in unfavorable geographic mix
due to the fact that the revenue per unit sold in these markets is generally less than in developed markets;
. Latin America benefited from the successful integration of Jugos del Valle. Refer to the heading "Beverage
Volume," above;
60
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lxpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 387,
"image": "lxpj0226_8.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "lxpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "8"
}
| 851
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 8\nThe favorable impact of currency fluctuations increased net operating revenues by approximately 2 percent. The\nfavorable impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates was primarily due to a weaker U.S. dollar compared to\ncertain other foreign currencies, including the Japanese yen, Mexican peso, Brazilian real, South African rand and\nAustralian dollar, which had a favorable impact on the Eurasia and Africa, Latin America, Pacific and Bottling\nInvestments operating segments. The favorable impact of a weaker U.S. dollar compared to the aforementioned\ncurrencies was partially offset by the impact of a stronger U.S. dollar compared to certain other foreign currencies,\nincluding the euro and British pound, which had an unfavorable impact on the Europe and Bottling Investments\noperating segments. Refer to the heading \"Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Position - Foreign Exchange.\"\nYear Ended December 31, 2009, versus Year Ended December 31, 2008\nNet operating revenues decreased by $954 million, or 3 percent. The following table illustrates, on a percentage basis,\nthe estimated impact of key factors resulting in the increase (decrease) in net operating revenues by operating segment:\nPercent Change 2009 vs. 200\nVolume1\nStructural\nchanges\nPrice, product &\ngeographic mix\nCurrency\nfluctuations\nTotal\nConsolidated\n3%\n1)%\n-%\n5)%\n(3)%\nEurasia & Africa\n5%\n-%\n(11)%\n6%\nEurope\n(2)\n(9\n(10)\nLatin America\n7\n*cell\n(15)\n1\nNorth America\nPacific\nBottling Investments\n(7)\nCorporate\n* Calculation is not meaningful.\nRepresents the percent change in net operating revenues attributable to the increase (decrease) in concentrate sales volume for our\ngeographic operating segments (expressed in equivalent unit cases). For our Bottling Investments operating segment, this represents\nthe percent change in net operating revenues attributable to the increase ( decrease) in unit case volume for the Bottling\nInvestments operating segment after considering the impact of structural changes. Our Bottling Investments operating segment data\nreflects unit case volume growth for consolidated bottlers only. Refer to the heading \"Beverage Volume,\" above.\nRefer to the heading \"Beverage Volume,\" above, for additional information related to changes in our unit case and\nconcentrate sales volume.\nStructural changes accounted for approximately 1 percent of the decrease in net operating revenues. This decrease was\nprimarily attributable to the sale of certain bottling operations during 2008, including Remil and a portion of our\nownership interest in Coca-cola Pakistan, which resulted in its deconsolidation. Refer to the heading \"Operations\nReview - Other Income (Loss) - Net\" and Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.\nPrice, product and geographic mix had a net zero percent impact on consolidated net operating revenues. Price, product\nand geographic mix for our operating segments was impacted by a variety of factors and events including, but not\nlimited to, the following:\n. consolidated results were unfavorably impacted by shifts in our marketing and media spend strategies. The shift\nin our marketing and media spend strategies was primarily due to spending more marketing dollars toward\nin-store activations, loyalty points programs and point-of-sale marketing. Many of these strategies impact net\nrevenues instead of marketing expenses. Refer to the heading \"Selling, General and Administrative Expenses,\"\nbelow;\n. consolidated results were unfavorably impacted by geographic mix as a result of growth in our emerging and\ndeveloping markets. The growth in our emerging and developing markets resulted in unfavorable geographic mix\ndue to the fact that the revenue per unit sold in these markets is generally less than in developed markets;\n. Latin America benefited from the successful integration of Jugos del Valle. Refer to the heading \"Beverage\nVolume,\" above;\n60\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lxpj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the increase in net operating revenues as part of favorable impact of currency fluctuations?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "by approximately 2 percent.",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
701
|
Which financial year's net operating revenues are compared?
|
Year ended December 31, 2009, versus Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
Page 8
The favorable impact of currency fluctuations increased net operating revenues by approximately 2 percent. The
favorable impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates was primarily due to a weaker U.S. dollar compared to
certain other foreign currencies, including the Japanese yen, Mexican peso, Brazilian real, South African rand and
Australian dollar, which had a favorable impact on the Eurasia and Africa, Latin America, Pacific and Bottling
Investments operating segments. The favorable impact of a weaker U.S. dollar compared to the aforementioned
currencies was partially offset by the impact of a stronger U.S. dollar compared to certain other foreign currencies,
including the euro and British pound, which had an unfavorable impact on the Europe and Bottling Investments
operating segments. Refer to the heading "Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Position - Foreign Exchange."
Year Ended December 31, 2009, versus Year Ended December 31, 2008
Net operating revenues decreased by $954 million, or 3 percent. The following table illustrates, on a percentage basis,
the estimated impact of key factors resulting in the increase (decrease) in net operating revenues by operating segment:
Percent Change 2009 vs. 200
Volume1
Structural
changes
Price, product &
geographic mix
Currency
fluctuations
Total
Consolidated
3%
1)%
-%
5)%
(3)%
Eurasia & Africa
5%
-%
(11)%
6%
Europe
(2)
(9
(10)
Latin America
7
*cell
(15)
1
North America
Pacific
Bottling Investments
(7)
Corporate
* Calculation is not meaningful.
Represents the percent change in net operating revenues attributable to the increase (decrease) in concentrate sales volume for our
geographic operating segments (expressed in equivalent unit cases). For our Bottling Investments operating segment, this represents
the percent change in net operating revenues attributable to the increase ( decrease) in unit case volume for the Bottling
Investments operating segment after considering the impact of structural changes. Our Bottling Investments operating segment data
reflects unit case volume growth for consolidated bottlers only. Refer to the heading "Beverage Volume," above.
Refer to the heading "Beverage Volume," above, for additional information related to changes in our unit case and
concentrate sales volume.
Structural changes accounted for approximately 1 percent of the decrease in net operating revenues. This decrease was
primarily attributable to the sale of certain bottling operations during 2008, including Remil and a portion of our
ownership interest in Coca-cola Pakistan, which resulted in its deconsolidation. Refer to the heading "Operations
Review - Other Income (Loss) - Net" and Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Price, product and geographic mix had a net zero percent impact on consolidated net operating revenues. Price, product
and geographic mix for our operating segments was impacted by a variety of factors and events including, but not
limited to, the following:
. consolidated results were unfavorably impacted by shifts in our marketing and media spend strategies. The shift
in our marketing and media spend strategies was primarily due to spending more marketing dollars toward
in-store activations, loyalty points programs and point-of-sale marketing. Many of these strategies impact net
revenues instead of marketing expenses. Refer to the heading "Selling, General and Administrative Expenses,"
below;
. consolidated results were unfavorably impacted by geographic mix as a result of growth in our emerging and
developing markets. The growth in our emerging and developing markets resulted in unfavorable geographic mix
due to the fact that the revenue per unit sold in these markets is generally less than in developed markets;
. Latin America benefited from the successful integration of Jugos del Valle. Refer to the heading "Beverage
Volume," above;
60
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lxpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 387,
"image": "lxpj0226_8.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "lxpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "8"
}
| 858
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 8\nThe favorable impact of currency fluctuations increased net operating revenues by approximately 2 percent. The\nfavorable impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates was primarily due to a weaker U.S. dollar compared to\ncertain other foreign currencies, including the Japanese yen, Mexican peso, Brazilian real, South African rand and\nAustralian dollar, which had a favorable impact on the Eurasia and Africa, Latin America, Pacific and Bottling\nInvestments operating segments. The favorable impact of a weaker U.S. dollar compared to the aforementioned\ncurrencies was partially offset by the impact of a stronger U.S. dollar compared to certain other foreign currencies,\nincluding the euro and British pound, which had an unfavorable impact on the Europe and Bottling Investments\noperating segments. Refer to the heading \"Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Position - Foreign Exchange.\"\nYear Ended December 31, 2009, versus Year Ended December 31, 2008\nNet operating revenues decreased by $954 million, or 3 percent. The following table illustrates, on a percentage basis,\nthe estimated impact of key factors resulting in the increase (decrease) in net operating revenues by operating segment:\nPercent Change 2009 vs. 200\nVolume1\nStructural\nchanges\nPrice, product &\ngeographic mix\nCurrency\nfluctuations\nTotal\nConsolidated\n3%\n1)%\n-%\n5)%\n(3)%\nEurasia & Africa\n5%\n-%\n(11)%\n6%\nEurope\n(2)\n(9\n(10)\nLatin America\n7\n*cell\n(15)\n1\nNorth America\nPacific\nBottling Investments\n(7)\nCorporate\n* Calculation is not meaningful.\nRepresents the percent change in net operating revenues attributable to the increase (decrease) in concentrate sales volume for our\ngeographic operating segments (expressed in equivalent unit cases). For our Bottling Investments operating segment, this represents\nthe percent change in net operating revenues attributable to the increase ( decrease) in unit case volume for the Bottling\nInvestments operating segment after considering the impact of structural changes. Our Bottling Investments operating segment data\nreflects unit case volume growth for consolidated bottlers only. Refer to the heading \"Beverage Volume,\" above.\nRefer to the heading \"Beverage Volume,\" above, for additional information related to changes in our unit case and\nconcentrate sales volume.\nStructural changes accounted for approximately 1 percent of the decrease in net operating revenues. This decrease was\nprimarily attributable to the sale of certain bottling operations during 2008, including Remil and a portion of our\nownership interest in Coca-cola Pakistan, which resulted in its deconsolidation. Refer to the heading \"Operations\nReview - Other Income (Loss) - Net\" and Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.\nPrice, product and geographic mix had a net zero percent impact on consolidated net operating revenues. Price, product\nand geographic mix for our operating segments was impacted by a variety of factors and events including, but not\nlimited to, the following:\n. consolidated results were unfavorably impacted by shifts in our marketing and media spend strategies. The shift\nin our marketing and media spend strategies was primarily due to spending more marketing dollars toward\nin-store activations, loyalty points programs and point-of-sale marketing. Many of these strategies impact net\nrevenues instead of marketing expenses. Refer to the heading \"Selling, General and Administrative Expenses,\"\nbelow;\n. consolidated results were unfavorably impacted by geographic mix as a result of growth in our emerging and\ndeveloping markets. The growth in our emerging and developing markets resulted in unfavorable geographic mix\ndue to the fact that the revenue per unit sold in these markets is generally less than in developed markets;\n. Latin America benefited from the successful integration of Jugos del Valle. Refer to the heading \"Beverage\nVolume,\" above;\n60\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lxpj0226\n\nQuestion: Which financial year's net operating revenues are compared?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Year ended December 31, 2009, versus Year Ended December 31, 2008",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
702
|
In which country is the consumer information centre located?
|
Atlanta, Georgia 30301
|
Page 14
mouth, teeth are exposed to a soft
drink for only a very short period
For more technical informa-
tion on phosphoric acid or other
of time and are constantly bathed
ingredient-related questions,
in a protective wash of saliva,
which acts to decrease the effect
please write or call:
of the acid.
The Coca-cola Company uses
Consumer Information Center
phosphoric acid in some of its
Coca-cola USA
products to provide a pleasant
P.O. Drawer 1734
tartness. The acid in these bever-
Atlanta, Georgia 30301
ages does not contribute to dental
1-800-GET COKE
erosion in the course of normal
(438-2653)
beverage consumption. Nor does
it make a significant contribution
to the total daily intake of phos-
phorus. In combination with a
nutritionally-adequate, balanced
diet and regular exercise, soft
Consumer Information Center
drinks provide a refreshing and
Coca Cola Ulsys
Division of The Coca-cola Company
positive contribution to everyday
living.
1/84
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
1. Greger, J.L., Krystofiak, M. Phosphorus intake of Americans. Food Technology
1982; 36(1): 78-84.
2. Intake of additives from soft drinks. Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Pro-
gramme, Codex Committee on Food Additives, 1979 Sept.
3. National Research Council and National Academy of Sciences. Food and Nutri-
tion Board. Recommended dietary allowances. 9th ed. Washington, D.C., 1980.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 388,
"image": "mtyj0226_14.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mtyj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "14"
}
| 393
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 14\nmouth, teeth are exposed to a soft\ndrink for only a very short period\nFor more technical informa-\ntion on phosphoric acid or other\nof time and are constantly bathed\ningredient-related questions,\nin a protective wash of saliva,\nwhich acts to decrease the effect\nplease write or call:\nof the acid.\nThe Coca-cola Company uses\nConsumer Information Center\nphosphoric acid in some of its\nCoca-cola USA\nproducts to provide a pleasant\nP.O. Drawer 1734\ntartness. The acid in these bever-\nAtlanta, Georgia 30301\nages does not contribute to dental\n1-800-GET COKE\nerosion in the course of normal\n(438-2653)\nbeverage consumption. Nor does\nit make a significant contribution\nto the total daily intake of phos-\nphorus. In combination with a\nnutritionally-adequate, balanced\ndiet and regular exercise, soft\nConsumer Information Center\ndrinks provide a refreshing and\nCoca Cola Ulsys\nDivision of The Coca-cola Company\npositive contribution to everyday\nliving.\n1/84\nADDITIONAL INFORMATION\n1. Greger, J.L., Krystofiak, M. Phosphorus intake of Americans. Food Technology\n1982; 36(1): 78-84.\n2. Intake of additives from soft drinks. Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Pro-\ngramme, Codex Committee on Food Additives, 1979 Sept.\n3. National Research Council and National Academy of Sciences. Food and Nutri-\ntion Board. Recommended dietary allowances. 9th ed. Washington, D.C., 1980.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226\n\nQuestion: In which country is the consumer information centre located?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Atlanta, Georgia 30301",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
703
|
Which acid do the coca-cola company use to provide a pleasant tartness?
|
phosphoric acid
|
Page 14
mouth, teeth are exposed to a soft
drink for only a very short period
For more technical informa-
tion on phosphoric acid or other
of time and are constantly bathed
ingredient-related questions,
in a protective wash of saliva,
which acts to decrease the effect
please write or call:
of the acid.
The Coca-cola Company uses
Consumer Information Center
phosphoric acid in some of its
Coca-cola USA
products to provide a pleasant
P.O. Drawer 1734
tartness. The acid in these bever-
Atlanta, Georgia 30301
ages does not contribute to dental
1-800-GET COKE
erosion in the course of normal
(438-2653)
beverage consumption. Nor does
it make a significant contribution
to the total daily intake of phos-
phorus. In combination with a
nutritionally-adequate, balanced
diet and regular exercise, soft
Consumer Information Center
drinks provide a refreshing and
Coca Cola Ulsys
Division of The Coca-cola Company
positive contribution to everyday
living.
1/84
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
1. Greger, J.L., Krystofiak, M. Phosphorus intake of Americans. Food Technology
1982; 36(1): 78-84.
2. Intake of additives from soft drinks. Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Pro-
gramme, Codex Committee on Food Additives, 1979 Sept.
3. National Research Council and National Academy of Sciences. Food and Nutri-
tion Board. Recommended dietary allowances. 9th ed. Washington, D.C., 1980.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 388,
"image": "mtyj0226_14.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mtyj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "14"
}
| 398
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 14\nmouth, teeth are exposed to a soft\ndrink for only a very short period\nFor more technical informa-\ntion on phosphoric acid or other\nof time and are constantly bathed\ningredient-related questions,\nin a protective wash of saliva,\nwhich acts to decrease the effect\nplease write or call:\nof the acid.\nThe Coca-cola Company uses\nConsumer Information Center\nphosphoric acid in some of its\nCoca-cola USA\nproducts to provide a pleasant\nP.O. Drawer 1734\ntartness. The acid in these bever-\nAtlanta, Georgia 30301\nages does not contribute to dental\n1-800-GET COKE\nerosion in the course of normal\n(438-2653)\nbeverage consumption. Nor does\nit make a significant contribution\nto the total daily intake of phos-\nphorus. In combination with a\nnutritionally-adequate, balanced\ndiet and regular exercise, soft\nConsumer Information Center\ndrinks provide a refreshing and\nCoca Cola Ulsys\nDivision of The Coca-cola Company\npositive contribution to everyday\nliving.\n1/84\nADDITIONAL INFORMATION\n1. Greger, J.L., Krystofiak, M. Phosphorus intake of Americans. Food Technology\n1982; 36(1): 78-84.\n2. Intake of additives from soft drinks. Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Pro-\ngramme, Codex Committee on Food Additives, 1979 Sept.\n3. National Research Council and National Academy of Sciences. Food and Nutri-\ntion Board. Recommended dietary allowances. 9th ed. Washington, D.C., 1980.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226\n\nQuestion: Which acid do the coca-cola company use to provide a pleasant tartness?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "phosphoric acid",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
704
|
what does soft drinks provide ?
|
refreshing and positive contribution to everyday living
|
Page 14
mouth, teeth are exposed to a soft
drink for only a very short period
For more technical informa-
tion on phosphoric acid or other
of time and are constantly bathed
ingredient-related questions,
in a protective wash of saliva,
which acts to decrease the effect
please write or call:
of the acid.
The Coca-cola Company uses
Consumer Information Center
phosphoric acid in some of its
Coca-cola USA
products to provide a pleasant
P.O. Drawer 1734
tartness. The acid in these bever-
Atlanta, Georgia 30301
ages does not contribute to dental
1-800-GET COKE
erosion in the course of normal
(438-2653)
beverage consumption. Nor does
it make a significant contribution
to the total daily intake of phos-
phorus. In combination with a
nutritionally-adequate, balanced
diet and regular exercise, soft
Consumer Information Center
drinks provide a refreshing and
Coca Cola Ulsys
Division of The Coca-cola Company
positive contribution to everyday
living.
1/84
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
1. Greger, J.L., Krystofiak, M. Phosphorus intake of Americans. Food Technology
1982; 36(1): 78-84.
2. Intake of additives from soft drinks. Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Pro-
gramme, Codex Committee on Food Additives, 1979 Sept.
3. National Research Council and National Academy of Sciences. Food and Nutri-
tion Board. Recommended dietary allowances. 9th ed. Washington, D.C., 1980.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 388,
"image": "mtyj0226_14.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mtyj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "14"
}
| 391
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 14\nmouth, teeth are exposed to a soft\ndrink for only a very short period\nFor more technical informa-\ntion on phosphoric acid or other\nof time and are constantly bathed\ningredient-related questions,\nin a protective wash of saliva,\nwhich acts to decrease the effect\nplease write or call:\nof the acid.\nThe Coca-cola Company uses\nConsumer Information Center\nphosphoric acid in some of its\nCoca-cola USA\nproducts to provide a pleasant\nP.O. Drawer 1734\ntartness. The acid in these bever-\nAtlanta, Georgia 30301\nages does not contribute to dental\n1-800-GET COKE\nerosion in the course of normal\n(438-2653)\nbeverage consumption. Nor does\nit make a significant contribution\nto the total daily intake of phos-\nphorus. In combination with a\nnutritionally-adequate, balanced\ndiet and regular exercise, soft\nConsumer Information Center\ndrinks provide a refreshing and\nCoca Cola Ulsys\nDivision of The Coca-cola Company\npositive contribution to everyday\nliving.\n1/84\nADDITIONAL INFORMATION\n1. Greger, J.L., Krystofiak, M. Phosphorus intake of Americans. Food Technology\n1982; 36(1): 78-84.\n2. Intake of additives from soft drinks. Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Pro-\ngramme, Codex Committee on Food Additives, 1979 Sept.\n3. National Research Council and National Academy of Sciences. Food and Nutri-\ntion Board. Recommended dietary allowances. 9th ed. Washington, D.C., 1980.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mtyj0226\n\nQuestion: what does soft drinks provide ?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "refreshing and positive contribution to everyday living",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
712
|
what has been playing a significant role in soft drink industry?
|
High Fructose corn sweeteners
|
Page 11
Shasta says good-bye to sugar,
September 28, 1979
bringslinaall-fructose softdrinks
FOOD ENGINEERING
Diet
September 1979
Shasta
Cola
Shasta
Cola
Shasta has reformulated its line of regular softdrinks, totally replacing sugar with high-
fructose corn syrup. The result is slightly fewer calories and a "less syrupy" taste. The
company will continue to market its line of saccharin-sweetened diet softdrinks
"syrupy" taste often associated with
High-fructose corn sweeteners
ordinary sugar.
have been playing an increasingly
softdrinks-from cola to collins mix-
significant role in the softdrink in-
er-in its full line of package choices.
Still another benefit to consumers.
says company-president Robert
dustry. That role has taken a giant
Why the switch?
Jaunich II, is economics. Fructose
step forward, recently, with an an-
nouncement from Shasta Beverages,
The move to replace ordinary re-
not only costs less than ordinary re-
Inc., Hayward, Calif.
fined sugar was obviously taken to
ined sugar, he says, but the U.S.
corn market promises a continuing
Shasta Beverages has introduced
ride the current wave of popularity
a reformulated regular softdrink
for fructose, as well as to offer con-
stable price for fructose sweetener.
sumers an "alternative," says the
"Therefore," says Jaunich, "sky-
line-using high-fructose corn syrup
(hics) to totally replace ordinary re-
company. However, the switch to
fructose also offers consumers a few
rocketing softdrink prices based on
inflated foreign sugar prices, such as
fined sugar. This marks the first time
a major softdrink company has total-
additional incentives.
An immediate attraction, says
those incurred in 1974, will no longer
be a threat in the future.'
ly eliminated the use of ordinary sug-
ar in its entire line of regular (non-
Lowry, is that the fructose-sweetened
The switch to fructose also signals
diet type) softdrinks, says the com-
softdrinks have a 10-12% reduction
the beginning of a complete reposi-
tioning for the entire company, con-
pany. Shasta will continue, however.
n calories, which has been verified
by an independent certified testing
cludes Jaunich, "With the total elimi-
to market its line of saccharin-sweet
laboratory.
nation of ordinary sugar from our
ened diet softdrinks.
The move to fructose, explains Ce-
Also. says Lowry, the "new"
regular line of products, our re-
cil Lowry, vice-president, science
Shasta tastes better than the "old"
Shasta. This is because the fructose
search and development will be ori-
and technology, includes 18 flavors
sweetener complements the natural
ented to making products that con-
of the company's regular sweetened
sumers feel better about drinking,"
fruit flavors, eliminating the typical
he said.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/ykpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 390,
"image": "ykpj0226_11.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "ykpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "11"
}
| 714
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 11\nShasta says good-bye to sugar,\nSeptember 28, 1979\nbringslinaall-fructose softdrinks\nFOOD ENGINEERING\nDiet\nSeptember 1979\nShasta\nCola\nShasta\nCola\nShasta has reformulated its line of regular softdrinks, totally replacing sugar with high-\nfructose corn syrup. The result is slightly fewer calories and a \"less syrupy\" taste. The\ncompany will continue to market its line of saccharin-sweetened diet softdrinks\n\"syrupy\" taste often associated with\nHigh-fructose corn sweeteners\nordinary sugar.\nhave been playing an increasingly\nsoftdrinks-from cola to collins mix-\nsignificant role in the softdrink in-\ner-in its full line of package choices.\nStill another benefit to consumers.\nsays company-president Robert\ndustry. That role has taken a giant\nWhy the switch?\nJaunich II, is economics. Fructose\nstep forward, recently, with an an-\nnouncement from Shasta Beverages,\nThe move to replace ordinary re-\nnot only costs less than ordinary re-\nInc., Hayward, Calif.\nfined sugar was obviously taken to\nined sugar, he says, but the U.S.\ncorn market promises a continuing\nShasta Beverages has introduced\nride the current wave of popularity\na reformulated regular softdrink\nfor fructose, as well as to offer con-\nstable price for fructose sweetener.\nsumers an \"alternative,\" says the\n\"Therefore,\" says Jaunich, \"sky-\nline-using high-fructose corn syrup\n(hics) to totally replace ordinary re-\ncompany. However, the switch to\nfructose also offers consumers a few\nrocketing softdrink prices based on\ninflated foreign sugar prices, such as\nfined sugar. This marks the first time\na major softdrink company has total-\nadditional incentives.\nAn immediate attraction, says\nthose incurred in 1974, will no longer\nbe a threat in the future.'\nly eliminated the use of ordinary sug-\nar in its entire line of regular (non-\nLowry, is that the fructose-sweetened\nThe switch to fructose also signals\ndiet type) softdrinks, says the com-\nsoftdrinks have a 10-12% reduction\nthe beginning of a complete reposi-\ntioning for the entire company, con-\npany. Shasta will continue, however.\nn calories, which has been verified\nby an independent certified testing\ncludes Jaunich, \"With the total elimi-\nto market its line of saccharin-sweet\nlaboratory.\nnation of ordinary sugar from our\nened diet softdrinks.\nThe move to fructose, explains Ce-\nAlso. says Lowry, the \"new\"\nregular line of products, our re-\ncil Lowry, vice-president, science\nShasta tastes better than the \"old\"\nShasta. This is because the fructose\nsearch and development will be ori-\nand technology, includes 18 flavors\nsweetener complements the natural\nented to making products that con-\nof the company's regular sweetened\nsumers feel better about drinking,\"\nfruit flavors, eliminating the typical\nhe said.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/ykpj0226\n\nQuestion: what has been playing a significant role in soft drink industry?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "High Fructose corn sweeteners",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
715
|
what is the percentage reduction in calories in the fructose sweetened soft drinks?
|
10-12%
|
Page 11
Shasta says good-bye to sugar,
September 28, 1979
bringslinaall-fructose softdrinks
FOOD ENGINEERING
Diet
September 1979
Shasta
Cola
Shasta
Cola
Shasta has reformulated its line of regular softdrinks, totally replacing sugar with high-
fructose corn syrup. The result is slightly fewer calories and a "less syrupy" taste. The
company will continue to market its line of saccharin-sweetened diet softdrinks
"syrupy" taste often associated with
High-fructose corn sweeteners
ordinary sugar.
have been playing an increasingly
softdrinks-from cola to collins mix-
significant role in the softdrink in-
er-in its full line of package choices.
Still another benefit to consumers.
says company-president Robert
dustry. That role has taken a giant
Why the switch?
Jaunich II, is economics. Fructose
step forward, recently, with an an-
nouncement from Shasta Beverages,
The move to replace ordinary re-
not only costs less than ordinary re-
Inc., Hayward, Calif.
fined sugar was obviously taken to
ined sugar, he says, but the U.S.
corn market promises a continuing
Shasta Beverages has introduced
ride the current wave of popularity
a reformulated regular softdrink
for fructose, as well as to offer con-
stable price for fructose sweetener.
sumers an "alternative," says the
"Therefore," says Jaunich, "sky-
line-using high-fructose corn syrup
(hics) to totally replace ordinary re-
company. However, the switch to
fructose also offers consumers a few
rocketing softdrink prices based on
inflated foreign sugar prices, such as
fined sugar. This marks the first time
a major softdrink company has total-
additional incentives.
An immediate attraction, says
those incurred in 1974, will no longer
be a threat in the future.'
ly eliminated the use of ordinary sug-
ar in its entire line of regular (non-
Lowry, is that the fructose-sweetened
The switch to fructose also signals
diet type) softdrinks, says the com-
softdrinks have a 10-12% reduction
the beginning of a complete reposi-
tioning for the entire company, con-
pany. Shasta will continue, however.
n calories, which has been verified
by an independent certified testing
cludes Jaunich, "With the total elimi-
to market its line of saccharin-sweet
laboratory.
nation of ordinary sugar from our
ened diet softdrinks.
The move to fructose, explains Ce-
Also. says Lowry, the "new"
regular line of products, our re-
cil Lowry, vice-president, science
Shasta tastes better than the "old"
Shasta. This is because the fructose
search and development will be ori-
and technology, includes 18 flavors
sweetener complements the natural
ented to making products that con-
of the company's regular sweetened
sumers feel better about drinking,"
fruit flavors, eliminating the typical
he said.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/ykpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 390,
"image": "ykpj0226_11.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "ykpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "11"
}
| 716
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 11\nShasta says good-bye to sugar,\nSeptember 28, 1979\nbringslinaall-fructose softdrinks\nFOOD ENGINEERING\nDiet\nSeptember 1979\nShasta\nCola\nShasta\nCola\nShasta has reformulated its line of regular softdrinks, totally replacing sugar with high-\nfructose corn syrup. The result is slightly fewer calories and a \"less syrupy\" taste. The\ncompany will continue to market its line of saccharin-sweetened diet softdrinks\n\"syrupy\" taste often associated with\nHigh-fructose corn sweeteners\nordinary sugar.\nhave been playing an increasingly\nsoftdrinks-from cola to collins mix-\nsignificant role in the softdrink in-\ner-in its full line of package choices.\nStill another benefit to consumers.\nsays company-president Robert\ndustry. That role has taken a giant\nWhy the switch?\nJaunich II, is economics. Fructose\nstep forward, recently, with an an-\nnouncement from Shasta Beverages,\nThe move to replace ordinary re-\nnot only costs less than ordinary re-\nInc., Hayward, Calif.\nfined sugar was obviously taken to\nined sugar, he says, but the U.S.\ncorn market promises a continuing\nShasta Beverages has introduced\nride the current wave of popularity\na reformulated regular softdrink\nfor fructose, as well as to offer con-\nstable price for fructose sweetener.\nsumers an \"alternative,\" says the\n\"Therefore,\" says Jaunich, \"sky-\nline-using high-fructose corn syrup\n(hics) to totally replace ordinary re-\ncompany. However, the switch to\nfructose also offers consumers a few\nrocketing softdrink prices based on\ninflated foreign sugar prices, such as\nfined sugar. This marks the first time\na major softdrink company has total-\nadditional incentives.\nAn immediate attraction, says\nthose incurred in 1974, will no longer\nbe a threat in the future.'\nly eliminated the use of ordinary sug-\nar in its entire line of regular (non-\nLowry, is that the fructose-sweetened\nThe switch to fructose also signals\ndiet type) softdrinks, says the com-\nsoftdrinks have a 10-12% reduction\nthe beginning of a complete reposi-\ntioning for the entire company, con-\npany. Shasta will continue, however.\nn calories, which has been verified\nby an independent certified testing\ncludes Jaunich, \"With the total elimi-\nto market its line of saccharin-sweet\nlaboratory.\nnation of ordinary sugar from our\nened diet softdrinks.\nThe move to fructose, explains Ce-\nAlso. says Lowry, the \"new\"\nregular line of products, our re-\ncil Lowry, vice-president, science\nShasta tastes better than the \"old\"\nShasta. This is because the fructose\nsearch and development will be ori-\nand technology, includes 18 flavors\nsweetener complements the natural\nented to making products that con-\nof the company's regular sweetened\nsumers feel better about drinking,\"\nfruit flavors, eliminating the typical\nhe said.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/ykpj0226\n\nQuestion: what is the percentage reduction in calories in the fructose sweetened soft drinks?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "10-12%",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
716
|
What is the average calories decreased over the past decade in the United States?
|
11%
|
Page 7
The Coca Cola Company
North America Beverage Portfolio - Calories
Total Portfolio
Over the past decade, our average calories per serving has decreased nearly 11% in the United
States
Nearly one-third of our volume in North America is low- and no-calorie.
In North America, 53% of our incremental volume growth over the last 15 years has been in low-
and no-calorie beverages.
Sparkling Portfolio
Nearly one-third of our sparkling volume in North America is low and no-calorie.
In North America, all of our incremental sparkling volume growth over the last 15 years has
been in low- and no-calorie beverages.
In 2011, Coca-cola Zero delivered double-digit volume growth for the fifth consecutive year in
North America.
When Diet Coke was introduced in the United States in 1982, 1% of our servings sold were low-
and no-calorie. In 1999, 32% of our Coca-cola trademark volume in North America was low- and
no-calorie. Today, 41% of our Coca-cola trademark volume in North America is low- and no-
calorie.
Additional Facts
Between 2000 and 2010, the number of calories Americans consumed from caloric sweeteners,
such as sucrose and HFCS, declined by more than 11%.
Pacific Beverage Portfolio - Calories
Total Portfolio
Twenty-two percent (22%) of our volume in the Pacific is low- and no-calorie.
In the Pacific, nearly 34% of our incremental volume growth over the last 15 years has been in
low- and no-calorie beverages.
Sparkling Portfolio
Six percent (6%) of our sparkling volume in the Pacific is low- and no-calorie.
In the Pacific, 9% of our incremental sparkling volume growth over the last 15 years has been in
low- and no-calorie beverages.
Eleven percent (11%) of our Coca-cola trademark volume in the Pacific is low- and no-calorie.
November 2012
Page | 7
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/jxpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 391,
"image": "jxpj0226_7.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "jxpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "7"
}
| 470
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 7\nThe Coca Cola Company\nNorth America Beverage Portfolio - Calories\nTotal Portfolio\nOver the past decade, our average calories per serving has decreased nearly 11% in the United\nStates\nNearly one-third of our volume in North America is low- and no-calorie.\nIn North America, 53% of our incremental volume growth over the last 15 years has been in low-\nand no-calorie beverages.\nSparkling Portfolio\nNearly one-third of our sparkling volume in North America is low and no-calorie.\nIn North America, all of our incremental sparkling volume growth over the last 15 years has\nbeen in low- and no-calorie beverages.\nIn 2011, Coca-cola Zero delivered double-digit volume growth for the fifth consecutive year in\nNorth America.\nWhen Diet Coke was introduced in the United States in 1982, 1% of our servings sold were low-\nand no-calorie. In 1999, 32% of our Coca-cola trademark volume in North America was low- and\nno-calorie. Today, 41% of our Coca-cola trademark volume in North America is low- and no-\ncalorie.\nAdditional Facts\nBetween 2000 and 2010, the number of calories Americans consumed from caloric sweeteners,\nsuch as sucrose and HFCS, declined by more than 11%.\nPacific Beverage Portfolio - Calories\nTotal Portfolio\nTwenty-two percent (22%) of our volume in the Pacific is low- and no-calorie.\nIn the Pacific, nearly 34% of our incremental volume growth over the last 15 years has been in\nlow- and no-calorie beverages.\nSparkling Portfolio\nSix percent (6%) of our sparkling volume in the Pacific is low- and no-calorie.\nIn the Pacific, 9% of our incremental sparkling volume growth over the last 15 years has been in\nlow- and no-calorie beverages.\nEleven percent (11%) of our Coca-cola trademark volume in the Pacific is low- and no-calorie.\nNovember 2012\nPage | 7\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/jxpj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the average calories decreased over the past decade in the United States?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "11%",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
718
|
In which year diet coke was introduced in United States?
|
1982
|
Page 7
The Coca Cola Company
North America Beverage Portfolio - Calories
Total Portfolio
Over the past decade, our average calories per serving has decreased nearly 11% in the United
States
Nearly one-third of our volume in North America is low- and no-calorie.
In North America, 53% of our incremental volume growth over the last 15 years has been in low-
and no-calorie beverages.
Sparkling Portfolio
Nearly one-third of our sparkling volume in North America is low and no-calorie.
In North America, all of our incremental sparkling volume growth over the last 15 years has
been in low- and no-calorie beverages.
In 2011, Coca-cola Zero delivered double-digit volume growth for the fifth consecutive year in
North America.
When Diet Coke was introduced in the United States in 1982, 1% of our servings sold were low-
and no-calorie. In 1999, 32% of our Coca-cola trademark volume in North America was low- and
no-calorie. Today, 41% of our Coca-cola trademark volume in North America is low- and no-
calorie.
Additional Facts
Between 2000 and 2010, the number of calories Americans consumed from caloric sweeteners,
such as sucrose and HFCS, declined by more than 11%.
Pacific Beverage Portfolio - Calories
Total Portfolio
Twenty-two percent (22%) of our volume in the Pacific is low- and no-calorie.
In the Pacific, nearly 34% of our incremental volume growth over the last 15 years has been in
low- and no-calorie beverages.
Sparkling Portfolio
Six percent (6%) of our sparkling volume in the Pacific is low- and no-calorie.
In the Pacific, 9% of our incremental sparkling volume growth over the last 15 years has been in
low- and no-calorie beverages.
Eleven percent (11%) of our Coca-cola trademark volume in the Pacific is low- and no-calorie.
November 2012
Page | 7
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/jxpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 391,
"image": "jxpj0226_7.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "jxpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "7"
}
| 466
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 7\nThe Coca Cola Company\nNorth America Beverage Portfolio - Calories\nTotal Portfolio\nOver the past decade, our average calories per serving has decreased nearly 11% in the United\nStates\nNearly one-third of our volume in North America is low- and no-calorie.\nIn North America, 53% of our incremental volume growth over the last 15 years has been in low-\nand no-calorie beverages.\nSparkling Portfolio\nNearly one-third of our sparkling volume in North America is low and no-calorie.\nIn North America, all of our incremental sparkling volume growth over the last 15 years has\nbeen in low- and no-calorie beverages.\nIn 2011, Coca-cola Zero delivered double-digit volume growth for the fifth consecutive year in\nNorth America.\nWhen Diet Coke was introduced in the United States in 1982, 1% of our servings sold were low-\nand no-calorie. In 1999, 32% of our Coca-cola trademark volume in North America was low- and\nno-calorie. Today, 41% of our Coca-cola trademark volume in North America is low- and no-\ncalorie.\nAdditional Facts\nBetween 2000 and 2010, the number of calories Americans consumed from caloric sweeteners,\nsuch as sucrose and HFCS, declined by more than 11%.\nPacific Beverage Portfolio - Calories\nTotal Portfolio\nTwenty-two percent (22%) of our volume in the Pacific is low- and no-calorie.\nIn the Pacific, nearly 34% of our incremental volume growth over the last 15 years has been in\nlow- and no-calorie beverages.\nSparkling Portfolio\nSix percent (6%) of our sparkling volume in the Pacific is low- and no-calorie.\nIn the Pacific, 9% of our incremental sparkling volume growth over the last 15 years has been in\nlow- and no-calorie beverages.\nEleven percent (11%) of our Coca-cola trademark volume in the Pacific is low- and no-calorie.\nNovember 2012\nPage | 7\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/jxpj0226\n\nQuestion: In which year diet coke was introduced in United States?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1982",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
721
|
what is the name of the food institute?
|
American Frozen food Institute
|
Page 2
COMMENTS ON BEHALF OF
THE AMERICAN FROZEN FOOD INSTITUTE
ON H. R. 10358
BEFORE THE
HOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE ON
HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT
This statement is submitted on behalf of the American Frozen
Food Institute ("AFFI") , a national non-profit trade association representing
companies that manufacture and distribute frozen food throughout the
United States. Included in its more than 400 members are the principal
packers, suppliers, and marketers of frozen food products in the United
States. AFFI and its members welcome this opportunity to share with
the Subcommittee the views of the frozen food industry on this important
legislation.
In submitting these comments to the House Subcommittee on
Health and the Environment, AFFI intends to focus on several areas of
particular importance to its members. In essence, AFFI:
1) Supports federal preemption of state labeling require-
ments that are in addition to or different from federal
requirements;
(2) Recommends inclusion of a provision which would
limit criminal penalties to violations of the Federal Food
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/ghpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 392,
"image": "ghpj0226_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "ghpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 265
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nCOMMENTS ON BEHALF OF\nTHE AMERICAN FROZEN FOOD INSTITUTE\nON H. R. 10358\nBEFORE THE\nHOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE ON\nHEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT\nThis statement is submitted on behalf of the American Frozen\nFood Institute (\"AFFI\") , a national non-profit trade association representing\ncompanies that manufacture and distribute frozen food throughout the\nUnited States. Included in its more than 400 members are the principal\npackers, suppliers, and marketers of frozen food products in the United\nStates. AFFI and its members welcome this opportunity to share with\nthe Subcommittee the views of the frozen food industry on this important\nlegislation.\nIn submitting these comments to the House Subcommittee on\nHealth and the Environment, AFFI intends to focus on several areas of\nparticular importance to its members. In essence, AFFI:\n1) Supports federal preemption of state labeling require-\nments that are in addition to or different from federal\nrequirements;\n(2) Recommends inclusion of a provision which would\nlimit criminal penalties to violations of the Federal Food\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/ghpj0226\n\nQuestion: what is the name of the food institute?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "American Frozen food Institute",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
722
|
How many members are included in the frozen food institute?
|
more than 400
|
Page 2
COMMENTS ON BEHALF OF
THE AMERICAN FROZEN FOOD INSTITUTE
ON H. R. 10358
BEFORE THE
HOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE ON
HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT
This statement is submitted on behalf of the American Frozen
Food Institute ("AFFI") , a national non-profit trade association representing
companies that manufacture and distribute frozen food throughout the
United States. Included in its more than 400 members are the principal
packers, suppliers, and marketers of frozen food products in the United
States. AFFI and its members welcome this opportunity to share with
the Subcommittee the views of the frozen food industry on this important
legislation.
In submitting these comments to the House Subcommittee on
Health and the Environment, AFFI intends to focus on several areas of
particular importance to its members. In essence, AFFI:
1) Supports federal preemption of state labeling require-
ments that are in addition to or different from federal
requirements;
(2) Recommends inclusion of a provision which would
limit criminal penalties to violations of the Federal Food
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/ghpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 392,
"image": "ghpj0226_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "ghpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 267
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nCOMMENTS ON BEHALF OF\nTHE AMERICAN FROZEN FOOD INSTITUTE\nON H. R. 10358\nBEFORE THE\nHOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE ON\nHEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT\nThis statement is submitted on behalf of the American Frozen\nFood Institute (\"AFFI\") , a national non-profit trade association representing\ncompanies that manufacture and distribute frozen food throughout the\nUnited States. Included in its more than 400 members are the principal\npackers, suppliers, and marketers of frozen food products in the United\nStates. AFFI and its members welcome this opportunity to share with\nthe Subcommittee the views of the frozen food industry on this important\nlegislation.\nIn submitting these comments to the House Subcommittee on\nHealth and the Environment, AFFI intends to focus on several areas of\nparticular importance to its members. In essence, AFFI:\n1) Supports federal preemption of state labeling require-\nments that are in addition to or different from federal\nrequirements;\n(2) Recommends inclusion of a provision which would\nlimit criminal penalties to violations of the Federal Food\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/ghpj0226\n\nQuestion: How many members are included in the frozen food institute?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "more than 400",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
723
|
AFFI stands for ?
|
American Frozen Food Institute
|
Page 2
COMMENTS ON BEHALF OF
THE AMERICAN FROZEN FOOD INSTITUTE
ON H. R. 10358
BEFORE THE
HOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE ON
HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT
This statement is submitted on behalf of the American Frozen
Food Institute ("AFFI") , a national non-profit trade association representing
companies that manufacture and distribute frozen food throughout the
United States. Included in its more than 400 members are the principal
packers, suppliers, and marketers of frozen food products in the United
States. AFFI and its members welcome this opportunity to share with
the Subcommittee the views of the frozen food industry on this important
legislation.
In submitting these comments to the House Subcommittee on
Health and the Environment, AFFI intends to focus on several areas of
particular importance to its members. In essence, AFFI:
1) Supports federal preemption of state labeling require-
ments that are in addition to or different from federal
requirements;
(2) Recommends inclusion of a provision which would
limit criminal penalties to violations of the Federal Food
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/ghpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 392,
"image": "ghpj0226_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "ghpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 261
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nCOMMENTS ON BEHALF OF\nTHE AMERICAN FROZEN FOOD INSTITUTE\nON H. R. 10358\nBEFORE THE\nHOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE ON\nHEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT\nThis statement is submitted on behalf of the American Frozen\nFood Institute (\"AFFI\") , a national non-profit trade association representing\ncompanies that manufacture and distribute frozen food throughout the\nUnited States. Included in its more than 400 members are the principal\npackers, suppliers, and marketers of frozen food products in the United\nStates. AFFI and its members welcome this opportunity to share with\nthe Subcommittee the views of the frozen food industry on this important\nlegislation.\nIn submitting these comments to the House Subcommittee on\nHealth and the Environment, AFFI intends to focus on several areas of\nparticular importance to its members. In essence, AFFI:\n1) Supports federal preemption of state labeling require-\nments that are in addition to or different from federal\nrequirements;\n(2) Recommends inclusion of a provision which would\nlimit criminal penalties to violations of the Federal Food\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/ghpj0226\n\nQuestion: AFFI stands for ?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "American Frozen Food Institute",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
724
|
This statement or comments is submitted on behalf of?
|
The American Frozen food institute
|
Page 2
COMMENTS ON BEHALF OF
THE AMERICAN FROZEN FOOD INSTITUTE
ON H. R. 10358
BEFORE THE
HOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE ON
HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT
This statement is submitted on behalf of the American Frozen
Food Institute ("AFFI") , a national non-profit trade association representing
companies that manufacture and distribute frozen food throughout the
United States. Included in its more than 400 members are the principal
packers, suppliers, and marketers of frozen food products in the United
States. AFFI and its members welcome this opportunity to share with
the Subcommittee the views of the frozen food industry on this important
legislation.
In submitting these comments to the House Subcommittee on
Health and the Environment, AFFI intends to focus on several areas of
particular importance to its members. In essence, AFFI:
1) Supports federal preemption of state labeling require-
ments that are in addition to or different from federal
requirements;
(2) Recommends inclusion of a provision which would
limit criminal penalties to violations of the Federal Food
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/ghpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 392,
"image": "ghpj0226_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "ghpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 267
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nCOMMENTS ON BEHALF OF\nTHE AMERICAN FROZEN FOOD INSTITUTE\nON H. R. 10358\nBEFORE THE\nHOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE ON\nHEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT\nThis statement is submitted on behalf of the American Frozen\nFood Institute (\"AFFI\") , a national non-profit trade association representing\ncompanies that manufacture and distribute frozen food throughout the\nUnited States. Included in its more than 400 members are the principal\npackers, suppliers, and marketers of frozen food products in the United\nStates. AFFI and its members welcome this opportunity to share with\nthe Subcommittee the views of the frozen food industry on this important\nlegislation.\nIn submitting these comments to the House Subcommittee on\nHealth and the Environment, AFFI intends to focus on several areas of\nparticular importance to its members. In essence, AFFI:\n1) Supports federal preemption of state labeling require-\nments that are in addition to or different from federal\nrequirements;\n(2) Recommends inclusion of a provision which would\nlimit criminal penalties to violations of the Federal Food\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/ghpj0226\n\nQuestion: This statement or comments is submitted on behalf of?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "The American Frozen food institute",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
726
|
where does the high fructose corn will come from ?
|
major corn refiners in the midwest
|
Page 5
8. Where Does Shasta Get Its Fructose?
Current production of fructose comes from one
of America's most abundant crops-corn. Over
47 per cent of the world's corn is grown in the
United States. Our supply of high fructose corn
sweetener will come from major corn refiners in the
Midwest. Because of our size, and our ability to
reformulate our entire line of regular soft drinks
nation-wide, Shasta has been able to arrange fruc-
lose allocations from these suppliers to satisfy de-
mand generated by our sales increases for years to
come.
9. Will Shasta Utilize Fructose Sweetener
for New Products?
We are currently researching the use of
fructose sweetener for a variety of new pro-
ducts, and Capri Sun, currently being test marketed
in the East, is sweetened with fructose sweetener.
We feel fructose has tremendous potential as a
THE
sweetener for both our current line of regular pro-
ducts and for a variety of new products currently
under consideration. For the foreseeable future,
fructose will be our only nutritive sweetener.
SHASTA
10. Why Aren't Other Soft Drink
Companies Using Fructose Sweetener In
ALTERNATIVE
Their Products?
any national companies, such as Coke and
M Pepsi, have approved use of fructose for
some of their product lines. However, most bottlers
have not reformulated. Unlike Shasta, these com-
panies are encumbered by a franchise bottler
system which has delayed the changeover.
However, we are confident Shasta's reformulation
will lead to a rapid growth in the use of fructose
sweetener in soft drinks. In the meantime, our na-
tional conversion has provided us a real break-
through and leadership position in the industry.
11. Just How Beneficent is Fructose?
A Ithough there may, in reality, be little or no
connection between sugar intake and health
problems, consumers remain wary of any product
Answers to the most frequently asked
with high sugar content. As a result, consumers
questions about fructose . . .
who are interested in cutting down their consump-
tion of ordinary refined sugar have had little or no
choice of alternative sweeteners until now.
However, because fructose is so new, there is not
yet a large amount of completed research studies
on it. The medical profession is not in total agree
ment on its use by diabetics and others who must
restrict their intake of ordinary sugar. Some doctors
prescribe fructose, others do not. Our advice for
people who have medically restricted diets is to
consult their personal physician.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/ykpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 393,
"image": "ykpj0226_5.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "ykpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "5"
}
| 609
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 5\n8. Where Does Shasta Get Its Fructose?\nCurrent production of fructose comes from one\nof America's most abundant crops-corn. Over\n47 per cent of the world's corn is grown in the\nUnited States. Our supply of high fructose corn\nsweetener will come from major corn refiners in the\nMidwest. Because of our size, and our ability to\nreformulate our entire line of regular soft drinks\nnation-wide, Shasta has been able to arrange fruc-\nlose allocations from these suppliers to satisfy de-\nmand generated by our sales increases for years to\ncome.\n9. Will Shasta Utilize Fructose Sweetener\nfor New Products?\nWe are currently researching the use of\nfructose sweetener for a variety of new pro-\nducts, and Capri Sun, currently being test marketed\nin the East, is sweetened with fructose sweetener.\nWe feel fructose has tremendous potential as a\nTHE\nsweetener for both our current line of regular pro-\nducts and for a variety of new products currently\nunder consideration. For the foreseeable future,\nfructose will be our only nutritive sweetener.\nSHASTA\n10. Why Aren't Other Soft Drink\nCompanies Using Fructose Sweetener In\nALTERNATIVE\nTheir Products?\nany national companies, such as Coke and\nM Pepsi, have approved use of fructose for\nsome of their product lines. However, most bottlers\nhave not reformulated. Unlike Shasta, these com-\npanies are encumbered by a franchise bottler\nsystem which has delayed the changeover.\nHowever, we are confident Shasta's reformulation\nwill lead to a rapid growth in the use of fructose\nsweetener in soft drinks. In the meantime, our na-\ntional conversion has provided us a real break-\nthrough and leadership position in the industry.\n11. Just How Beneficent is Fructose?\nA Ithough there may, in reality, be little or no\nconnection between sugar intake and health\nproblems, consumers remain wary of any product\nAnswers to the most frequently asked\nwith high sugar content. As a result, consumers\nquestions about fructose . . .\nwho are interested in cutting down their consump-\ntion of ordinary refined sugar have had little or no\nchoice of alternative sweeteners until now.\nHowever, because fructose is so new, there is not\nyet a large amount of completed research studies\non it. The medical profession is not in total agree\nment on its use by diabetics and others who must\nrestrict their intake of ordinary sugar. Some doctors\nprescribe fructose, others do not. Our advice for\npeople who have medically restricted diets is to\nconsult their personal physician.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/ykpj0226\n\nQuestion: where does the high fructose corn will come from ?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "major corn refiners in the midwest",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
728
|
for foreseeable future what will be our only nutritive sweetener?
|
Fructose
|
Page 5
8. Where Does Shasta Get Its Fructose?
Current production of fructose comes from one
of America's most abundant crops-corn. Over
47 per cent of the world's corn is grown in the
United States. Our supply of high fructose corn
sweetener will come from major corn refiners in the
Midwest. Because of our size, and our ability to
reformulate our entire line of regular soft drinks
nation-wide, Shasta has been able to arrange fruc-
lose allocations from these suppliers to satisfy de-
mand generated by our sales increases for years to
come.
9. Will Shasta Utilize Fructose Sweetener
for New Products?
We are currently researching the use of
fructose sweetener for a variety of new pro-
ducts, and Capri Sun, currently being test marketed
in the East, is sweetened with fructose sweetener.
We feel fructose has tremendous potential as a
THE
sweetener for both our current line of regular pro-
ducts and for a variety of new products currently
under consideration. For the foreseeable future,
fructose will be our only nutritive sweetener.
SHASTA
10. Why Aren't Other Soft Drink
Companies Using Fructose Sweetener In
ALTERNATIVE
Their Products?
any national companies, such as Coke and
M Pepsi, have approved use of fructose for
some of their product lines. However, most bottlers
have not reformulated. Unlike Shasta, these com-
panies are encumbered by a franchise bottler
system which has delayed the changeover.
However, we are confident Shasta's reformulation
will lead to a rapid growth in the use of fructose
sweetener in soft drinks. In the meantime, our na-
tional conversion has provided us a real break-
through and leadership position in the industry.
11. Just How Beneficent is Fructose?
A Ithough there may, in reality, be little or no
connection between sugar intake and health
problems, consumers remain wary of any product
Answers to the most frequently asked
with high sugar content. As a result, consumers
questions about fructose . . .
who are interested in cutting down their consump-
tion of ordinary refined sugar have had little or no
choice of alternative sweeteners until now.
However, because fructose is so new, there is not
yet a large amount of completed research studies
on it. The medical profession is not in total agree
ment on its use by diabetics and others who must
restrict their intake of ordinary sugar. Some doctors
prescribe fructose, others do not. Our advice for
people who have medically restricted diets is to
consult their personal physician.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/ykpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 393,
"image": "ykpj0226_5.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "ykpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "5"
}
| 605
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 5\n8. Where Does Shasta Get Its Fructose?\nCurrent production of fructose comes from one\nof America's most abundant crops-corn. Over\n47 per cent of the world's corn is grown in the\nUnited States. Our supply of high fructose corn\nsweetener will come from major corn refiners in the\nMidwest. Because of our size, and our ability to\nreformulate our entire line of regular soft drinks\nnation-wide, Shasta has been able to arrange fruc-\nlose allocations from these suppliers to satisfy de-\nmand generated by our sales increases for years to\ncome.\n9. Will Shasta Utilize Fructose Sweetener\nfor New Products?\nWe are currently researching the use of\nfructose sweetener for a variety of new pro-\nducts, and Capri Sun, currently being test marketed\nin the East, is sweetened with fructose sweetener.\nWe feel fructose has tremendous potential as a\nTHE\nsweetener for both our current line of regular pro-\nducts and for a variety of new products currently\nunder consideration. For the foreseeable future,\nfructose will be our only nutritive sweetener.\nSHASTA\n10. Why Aren't Other Soft Drink\nCompanies Using Fructose Sweetener In\nALTERNATIVE\nTheir Products?\nany national companies, such as Coke and\nM Pepsi, have approved use of fructose for\nsome of their product lines. However, most bottlers\nhave not reformulated. Unlike Shasta, these com-\npanies are encumbered by a franchise bottler\nsystem which has delayed the changeover.\nHowever, we are confident Shasta's reformulation\nwill lead to a rapid growth in the use of fructose\nsweetener in soft drinks. In the meantime, our na-\ntional conversion has provided us a real break-\nthrough and leadership position in the industry.\n11. Just How Beneficent is Fructose?\nA Ithough there may, in reality, be little or no\nconnection between sugar intake and health\nproblems, consumers remain wary of any product\nAnswers to the most frequently asked\nwith high sugar content. As a result, consumers\nquestions about fructose . . .\nwho are interested in cutting down their consump-\ntion of ordinary refined sugar have had little or no\nchoice of alternative sweeteners until now.\nHowever, because fructose is so new, there is not\nyet a large amount of completed research studies\non it. The medical profession is not in total agree\nment on its use by diabetics and others who must\nrestrict their intake of ordinary sugar. Some doctors\nprescribe fructose, others do not. Our advice for\npeople who have medically restricted diets is to\nconsult their personal physician.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/ykpj0226\n\nQuestion: for foreseeable future what will be our only nutritive sweetener?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Fructose",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
729
|
What stops companies like coke and pepsi from using fructose widely?
|
Franchise bottler system
|
Page 5
8. Where Does Shasta Get Its Fructose?
Current production of fructose comes from one
of America's most abundant crops-corn. Over
47 per cent of the world's corn is grown in the
United States. Our supply of high fructose corn
sweetener will come from major corn refiners in the
Midwest. Because of our size, and our ability to
reformulate our entire line of regular soft drinks
nation-wide, Shasta has been able to arrange fruc-
lose allocations from these suppliers to satisfy de-
mand generated by our sales increases for years to
come.
9. Will Shasta Utilize Fructose Sweetener
for New Products?
We are currently researching the use of
fructose sweetener for a variety of new pro-
ducts, and Capri Sun, currently being test marketed
in the East, is sweetened with fructose sweetener.
We feel fructose has tremendous potential as a
THE
sweetener for both our current line of regular pro-
ducts and for a variety of new products currently
under consideration. For the foreseeable future,
fructose will be our only nutritive sweetener.
SHASTA
10. Why Aren't Other Soft Drink
Companies Using Fructose Sweetener In
ALTERNATIVE
Their Products?
any national companies, such as Coke and
M Pepsi, have approved use of fructose for
some of their product lines. However, most bottlers
have not reformulated. Unlike Shasta, these com-
panies are encumbered by a franchise bottler
system which has delayed the changeover.
However, we are confident Shasta's reformulation
will lead to a rapid growth in the use of fructose
sweetener in soft drinks. In the meantime, our na-
tional conversion has provided us a real break-
through and leadership position in the industry.
11. Just How Beneficent is Fructose?
A Ithough there may, in reality, be little or no
connection between sugar intake and health
problems, consumers remain wary of any product
Answers to the most frequently asked
with high sugar content. As a result, consumers
questions about fructose . . .
who are interested in cutting down their consump-
tion of ordinary refined sugar have had little or no
choice of alternative sweeteners until now.
However, because fructose is so new, there is not
yet a large amount of completed research studies
on it. The medical profession is not in total agree
ment on its use by diabetics and others who must
restrict their intake of ordinary sugar. Some doctors
prescribe fructose, others do not. Our advice for
people who have medically restricted diets is to
consult their personal physician.
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/ykpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 393,
"image": "ykpj0226_5.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "ykpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "5"
}
| 609
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 5\n8. Where Does Shasta Get Its Fructose?\nCurrent production of fructose comes from one\nof America's most abundant crops-corn. Over\n47 per cent of the world's corn is grown in the\nUnited States. Our supply of high fructose corn\nsweetener will come from major corn refiners in the\nMidwest. Because of our size, and our ability to\nreformulate our entire line of regular soft drinks\nnation-wide, Shasta has been able to arrange fruc-\nlose allocations from these suppliers to satisfy de-\nmand generated by our sales increases for years to\ncome.\n9. Will Shasta Utilize Fructose Sweetener\nfor New Products?\nWe are currently researching the use of\nfructose sweetener for a variety of new pro-\nducts, and Capri Sun, currently being test marketed\nin the East, is sweetened with fructose sweetener.\nWe feel fructose has tremendous potential as a\nTHE\nsweetener for both our current line of regular pro-\nducts and for a variety of new products currently\nunder consideration. For the foreseeable future,\nfructose will be our only nutritive sweetener.\nSHASTA\n10. Why Aren't Other Soft Drink\nCompanies Using Fructose Sweetener In\nALTERNATIVE\nTheir Products?\nany national companies, such as Coke and\nM Pepsi, have approved use of fructose for\nsome of their product lines. However, most bottlers\nhave not reformulated. Unlike Shasta, these com-\npanies are encumbered by a franchise bottler\nsystem which has delayed the changeover.\nHowever, we are confident Shasta's reformulation\nwill lead to a rapid growth in the use of fructose\nsweetener in soft drinks. In the meantime, our na-\ntional conversion has provided us a real break-\nthrough and leadership position in the industry.\n11. Just How Beneficent is Fructose?\nA Ithough there may, in reality, be little or no\nconnection between sugar intake and health\nproblems, consumers remain wary of any product\nAnswers to the most frequently asked\nwith high sugar content. As a result, consumers\nquestions about fructose . . .\nwho are interested in cutting down their consump-\ntion of ordinary refined sugar have had little or no\nchoice of alternative sweeteners until now.\nHowever, because fructose is so new, there is not\nyet a large amount of completed research studies\non it. The medical profession is not in total agree\nment on its use by diabetics and others who must\nrestrict their intake of ordinary sugar. Some doctors\nprescribe fructose, others do not. Our advice for\npeople who have medically restricted diets is to\nconsult their personal physician.\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/ykpj0226\n\nQuestion: What stops companies like coke and pepsi from using fructose widely?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Franchise bottler system",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
730
|
this letter was written to whom?
|
Michael Jacobson
|
Page 2
COLLUMAR
A DIVISION OF THE UNITED CONSUMER SERVICE CORPORATION
466 LEXINGTON AVENUE / NEW YORK CITY / 10017.
212 532/8840
17 March 1975
Dear Michael Jacobson,
his has nothing to do with what we discussed earlier today,
but I hoped you might make some use of the enclosed, especially
the nonsense we underlined on p. 10, and I hope something can
be done to aid in this trade association's reform.
What dis -
turbs me about this kind of crap is that it is reprinted from
Grade Teacher (which I am not familiar with ) and I would dislike
it if my kid or somebody else's was hustled with this kind of
information. If you can't do anything with this, discard it.
I merely wanted to put it into hands that could do more with it,
potentially, than I.
Regards ,
Bill Wolf, Editor
P.s. Endowed is most recent Fayette
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/tkpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 395,
"image": "tkpj0226_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "tkpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 242
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nCOLLUMAR\nA DIVISION OF THE UNITED CONSUMER SERVICE CORPORATION\n466 LEXINGTON AVENUE / NEW YORK CITY / 10017.\n212 532/8840\n17 March 1975\nDear Michael Jacobson,\nhis has nothing to do with what we discussed earlier today,\nbut I hoped you might make some use of the enclosed, especially\nthe nonsense we underlined on p. 10, and I hope something can\nbe done to aid in this trade association's reform.\nWhat dis -\nturbs me about this kind of crap is that it is reprinted from\nGrade Teacher (which I am not familiar with ) and I would dislike\nit if my kid or somebody else's was hustled with this kind of\ninformation. If you can't do anything with this, discard it.\nI merely wanted to put it into hands that could do more with it,\npotentially, than I.\nRegards ,\nBill Wolf, Editor\nP.s. Endowed is most recent Fayette\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/tkpj0226\n\nQuestion: this letter was written to whom?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Michael Jacobson",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
731
|
On which date was this letter was written
|
17 March 1975
|
Page 2
COLLUMAR
A DIVISION OF THE UNITED CONSUMER SERVICE CORPORATION
466 LEXINGTON AVENUE / NEW YORK CITY / 10017.
212 532/8840
17 March 1975
Dear Michael Jacobson,
his has nothing to do with what we discussed earlier today,
but I hoped you might make some use of the enclosed, especially
the nonsense we underlined on p. 10, and I hope something can
be done to aid in this trade association's reform.
What dis -
turbs me about this kind of crap is that it is reprinted from
Grade Teacher (which I am not familiar with ) and I would dislike
it if my kid or somebody else's was hustled with this kind of
information. If you can't do anything with this, discard it.
I merely wanted to put it into hands that could do more with it,
potentially, than I.
Regards ,
Bill Wolf, Editor
P.s. Endowed is most recent Fayette
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/tkpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 395,
"image": "tkpj0226_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "tkpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 247
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nCOLLUMAR\nA DIVISION OF THE UNITED CONSUMER SERVICE CORPORATION\n466 LEXINGTON AVENUE / NEW YORK CITY / 10017.\n212 532/8840\n17 March 1975\nDear Michael Jacobson,\nhis has nothing to do with what we discussed earlier today,\nbut I hoped you might make some use of the enclosed, especially\nthe nonsense we underlined on p. 10, and I hope something can\nbe done to aid in this trade association's reform.\nWhat dis -\nturbs me about this kind of crap is that it is reprinted from\nGrade Teacher (which I am not familiar with ) and I would dislike\nit if my kid or somebody else's was hustled with this kind of\ninformation. If you can't do anything with this, discard it.\nI merely wanted to put it into hands that could do more with it,\npotentially, than I.\nRegards ,\nBill Wolf, Editor\nP.s. Endowed is most recent Fayette\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/tkpj0226\n\nQuestion: On which date was this letter was written",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "17 March 1975",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
732
|
who is the editor who signed this letter?
|
Bill Wolf
|
Page 2
COLLUMAR
A DIVISION OF THE UNITED CONSUMER SERVICE CORPORATION
466 LEXINGTON AVENUE / NEW YORK CITY / 10017.
212 532/8840
17 March 1975
Dear Michael Jacobson,
his has nothing to do with what we discussed earlier today,
but I hoped you might make some use of the enclosed, especially
the nonsense we underlined on p. 10, and I hope something can
be done to aid in this trade association's reform.
What dis -
turbs me about this kind of crap is that it is reprinted from
Grade Teacher (which I am not familiar with ) and I would dislike
it if my kid or somebody else's was hustled with this kind of
information. If you can't do anything with this, discard it.
I merely wanted to put it into hands that could do more with it,
potentially, than I.
Regards ,
Bill Wolf, Editor
P.s. Endowed is most recent Fayette
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/tkpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 395,
"image": "tkpj0226_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "tkpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 243
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nCOLLUMAR\nA DIVISION OF THE UNITED CONSUMER SERVICE CORPORATION\n466 LEXINGTON AVENUE / NEW YORK CITY / 10017.\n212 532/8840\n17 March 1975\nDear Michael Jacobson,\nhis has nothing to do with what we discussed earlier today,\nbut I hoped you might make some use of the enclosed, especially\nthe nonsense we underlined on p. 10, and I hope something can\nbe done to aid in this trade association's reform.\nWhat dis -\nturbs me about this kind of crap is that it is reprinted from\nGrade Teacher (which I am not familiar with ) and I would dislike\nit if my kid or somebody else's was hustled with this kind of\ninformation. If you can't do anything with this, discard it.\nI merely wanted to put it into hands that could do more with it,\npotentially, than I.\nRegards ,\nBill Wolf, Editor\nP.s. Endowed is most recent Fayette\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/tkpj0226\n\nQuestion: who is the editor who signed this letter?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Bill Wolf",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
734
|
under which corporation this letter has been written
|
The United Consumer Service Corporation
|
Page 2
COLLUMAR
A DIVISION OF THE UNITED CONSUMER SERVICE CORPORATION
466 LEXINGTON AVENUE / NEW YORK CITY / 10017.
212 532/8840
17 March 1975
Dear Michael Jacobson,
his has nothing to do with what we discussed earlier today,
but I hoped you might make some use of the enclosed, especially
the nonsense we underlined on p. 10, and I hope something can
be done to aid in this trade association's reform.
What dis -
turbs me about this kind of crap is that it is reprinted from
Grade Teacher (which I am not familiar with ) and I would dislike
it if my kid or somebody else's was hustled with this kind of
information. If you can't do anything with this, discard it.
I merely wanted to put it into hands that could do more with it,
potentially, than I.
Regards ,
Bill Wolf, Editor
P.s. Endowed is most recent Fayette
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/tkpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 395,
"image": "tkpj0226_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "tkpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 245
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nCOLLUMAR\nA DIVISION OF THE UNITED CONSUMER SERVICE CORPORATION\n466 LEXINGTON AVENUE / NEW YORK CITY / 10017.\n212 532/8840\n17 March 1975\nDear Michael Jacobson,\nhis has nothing to do with what we discussed earlier today,\nbut I hoped you might make some use of the enclosed, especially\nthe nonsense we underlined on p. 10, and I hope something can\nbe done to aid in this trade association's reform.\nWhat dis -\nturbs me about this kind of crap is that it is reprinted from\nGrade Teacher (which I am not familiar with ) and I would dislike\nit if my kid or somebody else's was hustled with this kind of\ninformation. If you can't do anything with this, discard it.\nI merely wanted to put it into hands that could do more with it,\npotentially, than I.\nRegards ,\nBill Wolf, Editor\nP.s. Endowed is most recent Fayette\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/tkpj0226\n\nQuestion: under which corporation this letter has been written",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "The United Consumer Service Corporation",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
737
|
For what price is the film kit plus teacher's guide available?
|
is available for $3.50.
|
Page 11
16
If you would like to have the soft
drink story for your class, you can-
via an entertaining 15 minute slide
film. The film traces the history of soft
drinks, the growth of the industry, the
place of soft drinks in the balanced
diet and much more with bright car-
toons and full color photographs. It is
accompanied by two 331's in. record
sound tracks. One for automatic and
the other for manual film advance.
The story is designed to interest mid-
dle elementary school level children
and older.
The film kit plus teacher's guide
is available for $3.50. For your copy:
fill in and mail the coupon below. Or
write National Soft Drink Association,
1 101 Sixteenth Street, N.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20036.
Now that you've
read the book,
see the film.
National Soft Drink Association
1101 Sixteenth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036
Please send me
copies of your
sound- slide film. Enclosed is.
(number of copies x $3.50).
Name.....
School name...
Street........
City.......
..safe......
Lip............ Please make check or money
order payable to
National Soft Drink Association
Reprinted from GRADE TEACHER Magazine
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/tkpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 396,
"image": "tkpj0226_11.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "tkpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "11"
}
| 326
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 11\n16\nIf you would like to have the soft\ndrink story for your class, you can-\nvia an entertaining 15 minute slide\nfilm. The film traces the history of soft\ndrinks, the growth of the industry, the\nplace of soft drinks in the balanced\ndiet and much more with bright car-\ntoons and full color photographs. It is\naccompanied by two 331's in. record\nsound tracks. One for automatic and\nthe other for manual film advance.\nThe story is designed to interest mid-\ndle elementary school level children\nand older.\nThe film kit plus teacher's guide\nis available for $3.50. For your copy:\nfill in and mail the coupon below. Or\nwrite National Soft Drink Association,\n1 101 Sixteenth Street, N.W.,\nWashington, D.C. 20036.\nNow that you've\nread the book,\nsee the film.\nNational Soft Drink Association\n1101 Sixteenth Street, N.W.\nWashington, D.C. 20036\nPlease send me\ncopies of your\nsound- slide film. Enclosed is.\n(number of copies x $3.50).\nName.....\nSchool name...\nStreet........\nCity.......\n..safe......\nLip............ Please make check or money\norder payable to\nNational Soft Drink Association\nReprinted from GRADE TEACHER Magazine\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/tkpj0226\n\nQuestion: For what price is the film kit plus teacher's guide available?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "is available for $3.50.",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
738
|
The story is designed to interest whom?
|
middle elementary school level children and older
|
Page 11
16
If you would like to have the soft
drink story for your class, you can-
via an entertaining 15 minute slide
film. The film traces the history of soft
drinks, the growth of the industry, the
place of soft drinks in the balanced
diet and much more with bright car-
toons and full color photographs. It is
accompanied by two 331's in. record
sound tracks. One for automatic and
the other for manual film advance.
The story is designed to interest mid-
dle elementary school level children
and older.
The film kit plus teacher's guide
is available for $3.50. For your copy:
fill in and mail the coupon below. Or
write National Soft Drink Association,
1 101 Sixteenth Street, N.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20036.
Now that you've
read the book,
see the film.
National Soft Drink Association
1101 Sixteenth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036
Please send me
copies of your
sound- slide film. Enclosed is.
(number of copies x $3.50).
Name.....
School name...
Street........
City.......
..safe......
Lip............ Please make check or money
order payable to
National Soft Drink Association
Reprinted from GRADE TEACHER Magazine
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/tkpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 396,
"image": "tkpj0226_11.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "tkpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "11"
}
| 320
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 11\n16\nIf you would like to have the soft\ndrink story for your class, you can-\nvia an entertaining 15 minute slide\nfilm. The film traces the history of soft\ndrinks, the growth of the industry, the\nplace of soft drinks in the balanced\ndiet and much more with bright car-\ntoons and full color photographs. It is\naccompanied by two 331's in. record\nsound tracks. One for automatic and\nthe other for manual film advance.\nThe story is designed to interest mid-\ndle elementary school level children\nand older.\nThe film kit plus teacher's guide\nis available for $3.50. For your copy:\nfill in and mail the coupon below. Or\nwrite National Soft Drink Association,\n1 101 Sixteenth Street, N.W.,\nWashington, D.C. 20036.\nNow that you've\nread the book,\nsee the film.\nNational Soft Drink Association\n1101 Sixteenth Street, N.W.\nWashington, D.C. 20036\nPlease send me\ncopies of your\nsound- slide film. Enclosed is.\n(number of copies x $3.50).\nName.....\nSchool name...\nStreet........\nCity.......\n..safe......\nLip............ Please make check or money\norder payable to\nNational Soft Drink Association\nReprinted from GRADE TEACHER Magazine\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/tkpj0226\n\nQuestion: The story is designed to interest whom?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "middle elementary school level children and older",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
739
|
Heading of the document?
|
The start of a fine home library
|
Page 2
The start Of
a fine home library
Let us send you, for the token
price of only: $1 each, three books
that have served as cornerstones in
many a fine home library.
The complete works of
Shakespeare
This beautiful 1300-page vol-
ume contains every word Shakespeare
ever wrote. All 37 of his comedies,
tragedies, and historical dramas in-
cluding Hamlet, Romeo and Juliet,
Macbeth, etc. Also all of his poems
and sonnets.
The works of Kipling
Actually eight books in one. A
Work
complete novel and 139 stories, bal-
lads and verses loved the world over,
including Mandalay, Gunga Din, The
Phantom Rickshaw, etc.
The works of De Maupassant
128 matchless tales by the ac-
knowledged master of the short story.
Regulartly $14.61. Now only $1 eachl
Every story complete and unexpur-
gated: The Diamond Necklace, A
Stevenson. 39 novels, stories,
umes for only $1 each, plus mailing,
Piece of String, The Will, etc.
poems. Treasure Island, Dr. Jekyll
and Mr. Hyde, Kidnaped, etc.
and to reserve the privilege of exam-
Each volume is clothed in a
ining future volumes as they come
handsomely-tooled binding of an-
Doyle. All the best of Sherlock
from the press.
tique ecru with both the elegant look
Holmes-The Sign of The Four, Red-
You will receive advance de-
Headed League, plus other works.
scription of all upcoming volumes.
and feel of leather.
You will enjoy reading these
Poe. 91 works: Annabel Lee,
The Raven, The Gold Bug, Murders
You may reject any book before or
books, just as millions before you
after you receive it. And you may
have. Your friends will admire them,
in the Rue Morgue, etc.
cancel your reservation any time you
The full series will also in-
wish.
perhaps even envy you for owning
Ibsen, Browning, Longfellow, Emer-
Mail coupon to: Black's Readers
them. And your children will gain a
clude the works of Cellini, Wilde,
Service, Roslyn, New York 11576.
real advantage with books like these
always close at hand.
son, Dostoevsky, Byron and many
others.
3 - LF
We offer you three books of
this calibre for only $1 each to intro-
Normally, you would expect to
Black's Readers Service
pay $10 each or more for deluxe edi-
ROSLYN, NEW YORK 11576
duce you to our new Golden Giants
Series. We think you will be im-
tions of books like these. But our di-
Please reserve for me the beautiful volumes in the
rect-to-the-public method of book dis-
new Golden Giants Series. For no money in advance,
send me the first 3 now: SHAKESPEARE, KIPLING and |
pressed. And we hope you will want
DE MAUPASSANT. A week after delivery, I will either
to own others in the Series, as they
tribution (which we have specialized
return them and owe nothing, or keep them for $1
each, plus mailing.
become available, including:
in for over 30 years) lets us make
these volumes available for only $4.89
Then, as they are printed, I will receive additional
Hugo. 36 complete works in- each, plus a few cents for mailing.
volumes on approval, for $4.89 each, plus mailing. I will
cluding Hunchback of Notre Dame,
get advance descriptions of future books. I may reject
Send no money now. Simply
any book before or after delivery. And I may cancel my
A Woman of the Streets, The Souls. mail coupon to get your first three vol-
reservation any time. (Books shipped in u.s.A. only.)
MR.
MRS.
MISS
(Please print plainly)
ADDRESS _
CITY &
STATE-
-ZIP-
GG-1A
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xfpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 400,
"image": "xfpj0226_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "xfpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 928
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nThe start Of\na fine home library\nLet us send you, for the token\nprice of only: $1 each, three books\nthat have served as cornerstones in\nmany a fine home library.\nThe complete works of\nShakespeare\nThis beautiful 1300-page vol-\nume contains every word Shakespeare\never wrote. All 37 of his comedies,\ntragedies, and historical dramas in-\ncluding Hamlet, Romeo and Juliet,\nMacbeth, etc. Also all of his poems\nand sonnets.\nThe works of Kipling\nActually eight books in one. A\nWork\ncomplete novel and 139 stories, bal-\nlads and verses loved the world over,\nincluding Mandalay, Gunga Din, The\nPhantom Rickshaw, etc.\nThe works of De Maupassant\n128 matchless tales by the ac-\nknowledged master of the short story.\nRegulartly $14.61. Now only $1 eachl\nEvery story complete and unexpur-\ngated: The Diamond Necklace, A\nStevenson. 39 novels, stories,\numes for only $1 each, plus mailing,\nPiece of String, The Will, etc.\npoems. Treasure Island, Dr. Jekyll\nand Mr. Hyde, Kidnaped, etc.\nand to reserve the privilege of exam-\nEach volume is clothed in a\nining future volumes as they come\nhandsomely-tooled binding of an-\nDoyle. All the best of Sherlock\nfrom the press.\ntique ecru with both the elegant look\nHolmes-The Sign of The Four, Red-\nYou will receive advance de-\nHeaded League, plus other works.\nscription of all upcoming volumes.\nand feel of leather.\nYou will enjoy reading these\nPoe. 91 works: Annabel Lee,\nThe Raven, The Gold Bug, Murders\nYou may reject any book before or\nbooks, just as millions before you\nafter you receive it. And you may\nhave. Your friends will admire them,\nin the Rue Morgue, etc.\ncancel your reservation any time you\nThe full series will also in-\nwish.\nperhaps even envy you for owning\nIbsen, Browning, Longfellow, Emer-\nMail coupon to: Black's Readers\nthem. And your children will gain a\nclude the works of Cellini, Wilde,\nService, Roslyn, New York 11576.\nreal advantage with books like these\nalways close at hand.\nson, Dostoevsky, Byron and many\nothers.\n3 - LF\nWe offer you three books of\nthis calibre for only $1 each to intro-\nNormally, you would expect to\nBlack's Readers Service\npay $10 each or more for deluxe edi-\nROSLYN, NEW YORK 11576\nduce you to our new Golden Giants\nSeries. We think you will be im-\ntions of books like these. But our di-\nPlease reserve for me the beautiful volumes in the\nrect-to-the-public method of book dis-\nnew Golden Giants Series. For no money in advance,\nsend me the first 3 now: SHAKESPEARE, KIPLING and |\npressed. And we hope you will want\nDE MAUPASSANT. A week after delivery, I will either\nto own others in the Series, as they\ntribution (which we have specialized\nreturn them and owe nothing, or keep them for $1\neach, plus mailing.\nbecome available, including:\nin for over 30 years) lets us make\nthese volumes available for only $4.89\nThen, as they are printed, I will receive additional\nHugo. 36 complete works in- each, plus a few cents for mailing.\nvolumes on approval, for $4.89 each, plus mailing. I will\ncluding Hunchback of Notre Dame,\nget advance descriptions of future books. I may reject\nSend no money now. Simply\nany book before or after delivery. And I may cancel my\nA Woman of the Streets, The Souls. mail coupon to get your first three vol-\nreservation any time. (Books shipped in u.s.A. only.)\nMR.\nMRS.\nMISS\n(Please print plainly)\nADDRESS _\nCITY &\nSTATE-\n-ZIP-\nGG-1A\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xfpj0226\n\nQuestion: Heading of the document?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "The start of a fine home library",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
740
|
What is the price of the token?
|
$1 each
|
Page 2
The start Of
a fine home library
Let us send you, for the token
price of only: $1 each, three books
that have served as cornerstones in
many a fine home library.
The complete works of
Shakespeare
This beautiful 1300-page vol-
ume contains every word Shakespeare
ever wrote. All 37 of his comedies,
tragedies, and historical dramas in-
cluding Hamlet, Romeo and Juliet,
Macbeth, etc. Also all of his poems
and sonnets.
The works of Kipling
Actually eight books in one. A
Work
complete novel and 139 stories, bal-
lads and verses loved the world over,
including Mandalay, Gunga Din, The
Phantom Rickshaw, etc.
The works of De Maupassant
128 matchless tales by the ac-
knowledged master of the short story.
Regulartly $14.61. Now only $1 eachl
Every story complete and unexpur-
gated: The Diamond Necklace, A
Stevenson. 39 novels, stories,
umes for only $1 each, plus mailing,
Piece of String, The Will, etc.
poems. Treasure Island, Dr. Jekyll
and Mr. Hyde, Kidnaped, etc.
and to reserve the privilege of exam-
Each volume is clothed in a
ining future volumes as they come
handsomely-tooled binding of an-
Doyle. All the best of Sherlock
from the press.
tique ecru with both the elegant look
Holmes-The Sign of The Four, Red-
You will receive advance de-
Headed League, plus other works.
scription of all upcoming volumes.
and feel of leather.
You will enjoy reading these
Poe. 91 works: Annabel Lee,
The Raven, The Gold Bug, Murders
You may reject any book before or
books, just as millions before you
after you receive it. And you may
have. Your friends will admire them,
in the Rue Morgue, etc.
cancel your reservation any time you
The full series will also in-
wish.
perhaps even envy you for owning
Ibsen, Browning, Longfellow, Emer-
Mail coupon to: Black's Readers
them. And your children will gain a
clude the works of Cellini, Wilde,
Service, Roslyn, New York 11576.
real advantage with books like these
always close at hand.
son, Dostoevsky, Byron and many
others.
3 - LF
We offer you three books of
this calibre for only $1 each to intro-
Normally, you would expect to
Black's Readers Service
pay $10 each or more for deluxe edi-
ROSLYN, NEW YORK 11576
duce you to our new Golden Giants
Series. We think you will be im-
tions of books like these. But our di-
Please reserve for me the beautiful volumes in the
rect-to-the-public method of book dis-
new Golden Giants Series. For no money in advance,
send me the first 3 now: SHAKESPEARE, KIPLING and |
pressed. And we hope you will want
DE MAUPASSANT. A week after delivery, I will either
to own others in the Series, as they
tribution (which we have specialized
return them and owe nothing, or keep them for $1
each, plus mailing.
become available, including:
in for over 30 years) lets us make
these volumes available for only $4.89
Then, as they are printed, I will receive additional
Hugo. 36 complete works in- each, plus a few cents for mailing.
volumes on approval, for $4.89 each, plus mailing. I will
cluding Hunchback of Notre Dame,
get advance descriptions of future books. I may reject
Send no money now. Simply
any book before or after delivery. And I may cancel my
A Woman of the Streets, The Souls. mail coupon to get your first three vol-
reservation any time. (Books shipped in u.s.A. only.)
MR.
MRS.
MISS
(Please print plainly)
ADDRESS _
CITY &
STATE-
-ZIP-
GG-1A
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xfpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 400,
"image": "xfpj0226_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "xfpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 927
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nThe start Of\na fine home library\nLet us send you, for the token\nprice of only: $1 each, three books\nthat have served as cornerstones in\nmany a fine home library.\nThe complete works of\nShakespeare\nThis beautiful 1300-page vol-\nume contains every word Shakespeare\never wrote. All 37 of his comedies,\ntragedies, and historical dramas in-\ncluding Hamlet, Romeo and Juliet,\nMacbeth, etc. Also all of his poems\nand sonnets.\nThe works of Kipling\nActually eight books in one. A\nWork\ncomplete novel and 139 stories, bal-\nlads and verses loved the world over,\nincluding Mandalay, Gunga Din, The\nPhantom Rickshaw, etc.\nThe works of De Maupassant\n128 matchless tales by the ac-\nknowledged master of the short story.\nRegulartly $14.61. Now only $1 eachl\nEvery story complete and unexpur-\ngated: The Diamond Necklace, A\nStevenson. 39 novels, stories,\numes for only $1 each, plus mailing,\nPiece of String, The Will, etc.\npoems. Treasure Island, Dr. Jekyll\nand Mr. Hyde, Kidnaped, etc.\nand to reserve the privilege of exam-\nEach volume is clothed in a\nining future volumes as they come\nhandsomely-tooled binding of an-\nDoyle. All the best of Sherlock\nfrom the press.\ntique ecru with both the elegant look\nHolmes-The Sign of The Four, Red-\nYou will receive advance de-\nHeaded League, plus other works.\nscription of all upcoming volumes.\nand feel of leather.\nYou will enjoy reading these\nPoe. 91 works: Annabel Lee,\nThe Raven, The Gold Bug, Murders\nYou may reject any book before or\nbooks, just as millions before you\nafter you receive it. And you may\nhave. Your friends will admire them,\nin the Rue Morgue, etc.\ncancel your reservation any time you\nThe full series will also in-\nwish.\nperhaps even envy you for owning\nIbsen, Browning, Longfellow, Emer-\nMail coupon to: Black's Readers\nthem. And your children will gain a\nclude the works of Cellini, Wilde,\nService, Roslyn, New York 11576.\nreal advantage with books like these\nalways close at hand.\nson, Dostoevsky, Byron and many\nothers.\n3 - LF\nWe offer you three books of\nthis calibre for only $1 each to intro-\nNormally, you would expect to\nBlack's Readers Service\npay $10 each or more for deluxe edi-\nROSLYN, NEW YORK 11576\nduce you to our new Golden Giants\nSeries. We think you will be im-\ntions of books like these. But our di-\nPlease reserve for me the beautiful volumes in the\nrect-to-the-public method of book dis-\nnew Golden Giants Series. For no money in advance,\nsend me the first 3 now: SHAKESPEARE, KIPLING and |\npressed. And we hope you will want\nDE MAUPASSANT. A week after delivery, I will either\nto own others in the Series, as they\ntribution (which we have specialized\nreturn them and owe nothing, or keep them for $1\neach, plus mailing.\nbecome available, including:\nin for over 30 years) lets us make\nthese volumes available for only $4.89\nThen, as they are printed, I will receive additional\nHugo. 36 complete works in- each, plus a few cents for mailing.\nvolumes on approval, for $4.89 each, plus mailing. I will\ncluding Hunchback of Notre Dame,\nget advance descriptions of future books. I may reject\nSend no money now. Simply\nany book before or after delivery. And I may cancel my\nA Woman of the Streets, The Souls. mail coupon to get your first three vol-\nreservation any time. (Books shipped in u.s.A. only.)\nMR.\nMRS.\nMISS\n(Please print plainly)\nADDRESS _\nCITY &\nSTATE-\n-ZIP-\nGG-1A\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xfpj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the price of the token?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "$1 each",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
741
|
How many pages does the volume contain?
|
1300-page
|
Page 2
The start Of
a fine home library
Let us send you, for the token
price of only: $1 each, three books
that have served as cornerstones in
many a fine home library.
The complete works of
Shakespeare
This beautiful 1300-page vol-
ume contains every word Shakespeare
ever wrote. All 37 of his comedies,
tragedies, and historical dramas in-
cluding Hamlet, Romeo and Juliet,
Macbeth, etc. Also all of his poems
and sonnets.
The works of Kipling
Actually eight books in one. A
Work
complete novel and 139 stories, bal-
lads and verses loved the world over,
including Mandalay, Gunga Din, The
Phantom Rickshaw, etc.
The works of De Maupassant
128 matchless tales by the ac-
knowledged master of the short story.
Regulartly $14.61. Now only $1 eachl
Every story complete and unexpur-
gated: The Diamond Necklace, A
Stevenson. 39 novels, stories,
umes for only $1 each, plus mailing,
Piece of String, The Will, etc.
poems. Treasure Island, Dr. Jekyll
and Mr. Hyde, Kidnaped, etc.
and to reserve the privilege of exam-
Each volume is clothed in a
ining future volumes as they come
handsomely-tooled binding of an-
Doyle. All the best of Sherlock
from the press.
tique ecru with both the elegant look
Holmes-The Sign of The Four, Red-
You will receive advance de-
Headed League, plus other works.
scription of all upcoming volumes.
and feel of leather.
You will enjoy reading these
Poe. 91 works: Annabel Lee,
The Raven, The Gold Bug, Murders
You may reject any book before or
books, just as millions before you
after you receive it. And you may
have. Your friends will admire them,
in the Rue Morgue, etc.
cancel your reservation any time you
The full series will also in-
wish.
perhaps even envy you for owning
Ibsen, Browning, Longfellow, Emer-
Mail coupon to: Black's Readers
them. And your children will gain a
clude the works of Cellini, Wilde,
Service, Roslyn, New York 11576.
real advantage with books like these
always close at hand.
son, Dostoevsky, Byron and many
others.
3 - LF
We offer you three books of
this calibre for only $1 each to intro-
Normally, you would expect to
Black's Readers Service
pay $10 each or more for deluxe edi-
ROSLYN, NEW YORK 11576
duce you to our new Golden Giants
Series. We think you will be im-
tions of books like these. But our di-
Please reserve for me the beautiful volumes in the
rect-to-the-public method of book dis-
new Golden Giants Series. For no money in advance,
send me the first 3 now: SHAKESPEARE, KIPLING and |
pressed. And we hope you will want
DE MAUPASSANT. A week after delivery, I will either
to own others in the Series, as they
tribution (which we have specialized
return them and owe nothing, or keep them for $1
each, plus mailing.
become available, including:
in for over 30 years) lets us make
these volumes available for only $4.89
Then, as they are printed, I will receive additional
Hugo. 36 complete works in- each, plus a few cents for mailing.
volumes on approval, for $4.89 each, plus mailing. I will
cluding Hunchback of Notre Dame,
get advance descriptions of future books. I may reject
Send no money now. Simply
any book before or after delivery. And I may cancel my
A Woman of the Streets, The Souls. mail coupon to get your first three vol-
reservation any time. (Books shipped in u.s.A. only.)
MR.
MRS.
MISS
(Please print plainly)
ADDRESS _
CITY &
STATE-
-ZIP-
GG-1A
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xfpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 400,
"image": "xfpj0226_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "xfpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 927
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nThe start Of\na fine home library\nLet us send you, for the token\nprice of only: $1 each, three books\nthat have served as cornerstones in\nmany a fine home library.\nThe complete works of\nShakespeare\nThis beautiful 1300-page vol-\nume contains every word Shakespeare\never wrote. All 37 of his comedies,\ntragedies, and historical dramas in-\ncluding Hamlet, Romeo and Juliet,\nMacbeth, etc. Also all of his poems\nand sonnets.\nThe works of Kipling\nActually eight books in one. A\nWork\ncomplete novel and 139 stories, bal-\nlads and verses loved the world over,\nincluding Mandalay, Gunga Din, The\nPhantom Rickshaw, etc.\nThe works of De Maupassant\n128 matchless tales by the ac-\nknowledged master of the short story.\nRegulartly $14.61. Now only $1 eachl\nEvery story complete and unexpur-\ngated: The Diamond Necklace, A\nStevenson. 39 novels, stories,\numes for only $1 each, plus mailing,\nPiece of String, The Will, etc.\npoems. Treasure Island, Dr. Jekyll\nand Mr. Hyde, Kidnaped, etc.\nand to reserve the privilege of exam-\nEach volume is clothed in a\nining future volumes as they come\nhandsomely-tooled binding of an-\nDoyle. All the best of Sherlock\nfrom the press.\ntique ecru with both the elegant look\nHolmes-The Sign of The Four, Red-\nYou will receive advance de-\nHeaded League, plus other works.\nscription of all upcoming volumes.\nand feel of leather.\nYou will enjoy reading these\nPoe. 91 works: Annabel Lee,\nThe Raven, The Gold Bug, Murders\nYou may reject any book before or\nbooks, just as millions before you\nafter you receive it. And you may\nhave. Your friends will admire them,\nin the Rue Morgue, etc.\ncancel your reservation any time you\nThe full series will also in-\nwish.\nperhaps even envy you for owning\nIbsen, Browning, Longfellow, Emer-\nMail coupon to: Black's Readers\nthem. And your children will gain a\nclude the works of Cellini, Wilde,\nService, Roslyn, New York 11576.\nreal advantage with books like these\nalways close at hand.\nson, Dostoevsky, Byron and many\nothers.\n3 - LF\nWe offer you three books of\nthis calibre for only $1 each to intro-\nNormally, you would expect to\nBlack's Readers Service\npay $10 each or more for deluxe edi-\nROSLYN, NEW YORK 11576\nduce you to our new Golden Giants\nSeries. We think you will be im-\ntions of books like these. But our di-\nPlease reserve for me the beautiful volumes in the\nrect-to-the-public method of book dis-\nnew Golden Giants Series. For no money in advance,\nsend me the first 3 now: SHAKESPEARE, KIPLING and |\npressed. And we hope you will want\nDE MAUPASSANT. A week after delivery, I will either\nto own others in the Series, as they\ntribution (which we have specialized\nreturn them and owe nothing, or keep them for $1\neach, plus mailing.\nbecome available, including:\nin for over 30 years) lets us make\nthese volumes available for only $4.89\nThen, as they are printed, I will receive additional\nHugo. 36 complete works in- each, plus a few cents for mailing.\nvolumes on approval, for $4.89 each, plus mailing. I will\ncluding Hunchback of Notre Dame,\nget advance descriptions of future books. I may reject\nSend no money now. Simply\nany book before or after delivery. And I may cancel my\nA Woman of the Streets, The Souls. mail coupon to get your first three vol-\nreservation any time. (Books shipped in u.s.A. only.)\nMR.\nMRS.\nMISS\n(Please print plainly)\nADDRESS _\nCITY &\nSTATE-\n-ZIP-\nGG-1A\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xfpj0226\n\nQuestion: How many pages does the volume contain?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1300-page",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
742
|
How many stories are present in The works of Kipling?
|
139 stories
|
Page 2
The start Of
a fine home library
Let us send you, for the token
price of only: $1 each, three books
that have served as cornerstones in
many a fine home library.
The complete works of
Shakespeare
This beautiful 1300-page vol-
ume contains every word Shakespeare
ever wrote. All 37 of his comedies,
tragedies, and historical dramas in-
cluding Hamlet, Romeo and Juliet,
Macbeth, etc. Also all of his poems
and sonnets.
The works of Kipling
Actually eight books in one. A
Work
complete novel and 139 stories, bal-
lads and verses loved the world over,
including Mandalay, Gunga Din, The
Phantom Rickshaw, etc.
The works of De Maupassant
128 matchless tales by the ac-
knowledged master of the short story.
Regulartly $14.61. Now only $1 eachl
Every story complete and unexpur-
gated: The Diamond Necklace, A
Stevenson. 39 novels, stories,
umes for only $1 each, plus mailing,
Piece of String, The Will, etc.
poems. Treasure Island, Dr. Jekyll
and Mr. Hyde, Kidnaped, etc.
and to reserve the privilege of exam-
Each volume is clothed in a
ining future volumes as they come
handsomely-tooled binding of an-
Doyle. All the best of Sherlock
from the press.
tique ecru with both the elegant look
Holmes-The Sign of The Four, Red-
You will receive advance de-
Headed League, plus other works.
scription of all upcoming volumes.
and feel of leather.
You will enjoy reading these
Poe. 91 works: Annabel Lee,
The Raven, The Gold Bug, Murders
You may reject any book before or
books, just as millions before you
after you receive it. And you may
have. Your friends will admire them,
in the Rue Morgue, etc.
cancel your reservation any time you
The full series will also in-
wish.
perhaps even envy you for owning
Ibsen, Browning, Longfellow, Emer-
Mail coupon to: Black's Readers
them. And your children will gain a
clude the works of Cellini, Wilde,
Service, Roslyn, New York 11576.
real advantage with books like these
always close at hand.
son, Dostoevsky, Byron and many
others.
3 - LF
We offer you three books of
this calibre for only $1 each to intro-
Normally, you would expect to
Black's Readers Service
pay $10 each or more for deluxe edi-
ROSLYN, NEW YORK 11576
duce you to our new Golden Giants
Series. We think you will be im-
tions of books like these. But our di-
Please reserve for me the beautiful volumes in the
rect-to-the-public method of book dis-
new Golden Giants Series. For no money in advance,
send me the first 3 now: SHAKESPEARE, KIPLING and |
pressed. And we hope you will want
DE MAUPASSANT. A week after delivery, I will either
to own others in the Series, as they
tribution (which we have specialized
return them and owe nothing, or keep them for $1
each, plus mailing.
become available, including:
in for over 30 years) lets us make
these volumes available for only $4.89
Then, as they are printed, I will receive additional
Hugo. 36 complete works in- each, plus a few cents for mailing.
volumes on approval, for $4.89 each, plus mailing. I will
cluding Hunchback of Notre Dame,
get advance descriptions of future books. I may reject
Send no money now. Simply
any book before or after delivery. And I may cancel my
A Woman of the Streets, The Souls. mail coupon to get your first three vol-
reservation any time. (Books shipped in u.s.A. only.)
MR.
MRS.
MISS
(Please print plainly)
ADDRESS _
CITY &
STATE-
-ZIP-
GG-1A
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xfpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 400,
"image": "xfpj0226_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "xfpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 931
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nThe start Of\na fine home library\nLet us send you, for the token\nprice of only: $1 each, three books\nthat have served as cornerstones in\nmany a fine home library.\nThe complete works of\nShakespeare\nThis beautiful 1300-page vol-\nume contains every word Shakespeare\never wrote. All 37 of his comedies,\ntragedies, and historical dramas in-\ncluding Hamlet, Romeo and Juliet,\nMacbeth, etc. Also all of his poems\nand sonnets.\nThe works of Kipling\nActually eight books in one. A\nWork\ncomplete novel and 139 stories, bal-\nlads and verses loved the world over,\nincluding Mandalay, Gunga Din, The\nPhantom Rickshaw, etc.\nThe works of De Maupassant\n128 matchless tales by the ac-\nknowledged master of the short story.\nRegulartly $14.61. Now only $1 eachl\nEvery story complete and unexpur-\ngated: The Diamond Necklace, A\nStevenson. 39 novels, stories,\numes for only $1 each, plus mailing,\nPiece of String, The Will, etc.\npoems. Treasure Island, Dr. Jekyll\nand Mr. Hyde, Kidnaped, etc.\nand to reserve the privilege of exam-\nEach volume is clothed in a\nining future volumes as they come\nhandsomely-tooled binding of an-\nDoyle. All the best of Sherlock\nfrom the press.\ntique ecru with both the elegant look\nHolmes-The Sign of The Four, Red-\nYou will receive advance de-\nHeaded League, plus other works.\nscription of all upcoming volumes.\nand feel of leather.\nYou will enjoy reading these\nPoe. 91 works: Annabel Lee,\nThe Raven, The Gold Bug, Murders\nYou may reject any book before or\nbooks, just as millions before you\nafter you receive it. And you may\nhave. Your friends will admire them,\nin the Rue Morgue, etc.\ncancel your reservation any time you\nThe full series will also in-\nwish.\nperhaps even envy you for owning\nIbsen, Browning, Longfellow, Emer-\nMail coupon to: Black's Readers\nthem. And your children will gain a\nclude the works of Cellini, Wilde,\nService, Roslyn, New York 11576.\nreal advantage with books like these\nalways close at hand.\nson, Dostoevsky, Byron and many\nothers.\n3 - LF\nWe offer you three books of\nthis calibre for only $1 each to intro-\nNormally, you would expect to\nBlack's Readers Service\npay $10 each or more for deluxe edi-\nROSLYN, NEW YORK 11576\nduce you to our new Golden Giants\nSeries. We think you will be im-\ntions of books like these. But our di-\nPlease reserve for me the beautiful volumes in the\nrect-to-the-public method of book dis-\nnew Golden Giants Series. For no money in advance,\nsend me the first 3 now: SHAKESPEARE, KIPLING and |\npressed. And we hope you will want\nDE MAUPASSANT. A week after delivery, I will either\nto own others in the Series, as they\ntribution (which we have specialized\nreturn them and owe nothing, or keep them for $1\neach, plus mailing.\nbecome available, including:\nin for over 30 years) lets us make\nthese volumes available for only $4.89\nThen, as they are printed, I will receive additional\nHugo. 36 complete works in- each, plus a few cents for mailing.\nvolumes on approval, for $4.89 each, plus mailing. I will\ncluding Hunchback of Notre Dame,\nget advance descriptions of future books. I may reject\nSend no money now. Simply\nany book before or after delivery. And I may cancel my\nA Woman of the Streets, The Souls. mail coupon to get your first three vol-\nreservation any time. (Books shipped in u.s.A. only.)\nMR.\nMRS.\nMISS\n(Please print plainly)\nADDRESS _\nCITY &\nSTATE-\n-ZIP-\nGG-1A\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xfpj0226\n\nQuestion: How many stories are present in The works of Kipling?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "139 stories",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
743
|
Heading of the document?
|
Thirst is a pretty good reason for drinking
|
Page 1
Michael Poked
Happy
Birthday
THIRST
- The susans
IS A FRETIME OD REASON
FOR DRINKING.
and well-being of people
today.
But there's also some-
03191217
thing more - another side
of the coin. Time devoted
to pleasure and relaxation
. . . a pause to refresh .. . a
beverage to enjoy are also
meaningful in these pres-
sure packed times. What's
Man has given himself
life without fun, music,
refreshment? Pleasure has
a minimum daily require-
its place.
ment for vitamins and pro-
tein. But we think he owes
And so a soft drink -
which in our book is purely
RECYCLED
himself a minimum re-
quirement of refreshment
a refreshing carbonated
and pleasure too. Nutri-
beverage designed only
tious food, balanced diets
to please and to refresh -
has an important
are critical to the health
place too.
ca Cola
The Coca Cola Company
RECYCLEN
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xfpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 401,
"image": "xfpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "xfpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 264
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nMichael Poked\nHappy\nBirthday\nTHIRST\n- The susans\nIS A FRETIME OD REASON\nFOR DRINKING.\nand well-being of people\ntoday.\nBut there's also some-\n03191217\nthing more - another side\nof the coin. Time devoted\nto pleasure and relaxation\n. . . a pause to refresh .. . a\nbeverage to enjoy are also\nmeaningful in these pres-\nsure packed times. What's\nMan has given himself\nlife without fun, music,\nrefreshment? Pleasure has\na minimum daily require-\nits place.\nment for vitamins and pro-\ntein. But we think he owes\nAnd so a soft drink -\nwhich in our book is purely\nRECYCLED\nhimself a minimum re-\nquirement of refreshment\na refreshing carbonated\nand pleasure too. Nutri-\nbeverage designed only\ntious food, balanced diets\nto please and to refresh -\nhas an important\nare critical to the health\nplace too.\nca Cola\nThe Coca Cola Company\nRECYCLEN\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xfpj0226\n\nQuestion: Heading of the document?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Thirst is a pretty good reason for drinking",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
744
|
What is the name of the company?
|
The Coca-Cola company
|
Page 1
Michael Poked
Happy
Birthday
THIRST
- The susans
IS A FRETIME OD REASON
FOR DRINKING.
and well-being of people
today.
But there's also some-
03191217
thing more - another side
of the coin. Time devoted
to pleasure and relaxation
. . . a pause to refresh .. . a
beverage to enjoy are also
meaningful in these pres-
sure packed times. What's
Man has given himself
life without fun, music,
refreshment? Pleasure has
a minimum daily require-
its place.
ment for vitamins and pro-
tein. But we think he owes
And so a soft drink -
which in our book is purely
RECYCLED
himself a minimum re-
quirement of refreshment
a refreshing carbonated
and pleasure too. Nutri-
beverage designed only
tious food, balanced diets
to please and to refresh -
has an important
are critical to the health
place too.
ca Cola
The Coca Cola Company
RECYCLEN
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xfpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 401,
"image": "xfpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "xfpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 262
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nMichael Poked\nHappy\nBirthday\nTHIRST\n- The susans\nIS A FRETIME OD REASON\nFOR DRINKING.\nand well-being of people\ntoday.\nBut there's also some-\n03191217\nthing more - another side\nof the coin. Time devoted\nto pleasure and relaxation\n. . . a pause to refresh .. . a\nbeverage to enjoy are also\nmeaningful in these pres-\nsure packed times. What's\nMan has given himself\nlife without fun, music,\nrefreshment? Pleasure has\na minimum daily require-\nits place.\nment for vitamins and pro-\ntein. But we think he owes\nAnd so a soft drink -\nwhich in our book is purely\nRECYCLED\nhimself a minimum re-\nquirement of refreshment\na refreshing carbonated\nand pleasure too. Nutri-\nbeverage designed only\ntious food, balanced diets\nto please and to refresh -\nhas an important\nare critical to the health\nplace too.\nca Cola\nThe Coca Cola Company\nRECYCLEN\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xfpj0226\n\nQuestion: What is the name of the company?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "The Coca-Cola company",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
746
|
What are critical for well-being of people today?
|
Nutritious food, balanced diets
|
Page 1
Michael Poked
Happy
Birthday
THIRST
- The susans
IS A FRETIME OD REASON
FOR DRINKING.
and well-being of people
today.
But there's also some-
03191217
thing more - another side
of the coin. Time devoted
to pleasure and relaxation
. . . a pause to refresh .. . a
beverage to enjoy are also
meaningful in these pres-
sure packed times. What's
Man has given himself
life without fun, music,
refreshment? Pleasure has
a minimum daily require-
its place.
ment for vitamins and pro-
tein. But we think he owes
And so a soft drink -
which in our book is purely
RECYCLED
himself a minimum re-
quirement of refreshment
a refreshing carbonated
and pleasure too. Nutri-
beverage designed only
tious food, balanced diets
to please and to refresh -
has an important
are critical to the health
place too.
ca Cola
The Coca Cola Company
RECYCLEN
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xfpj0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 401,
"image": "xfpj0226_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "xfpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 267
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nMichael Poked\nHappy\nBirthday\nTHIRST\n- The susans\nIS A FRETIME OD REASON\nFOR DRINKING.\nand well-being of people\ntoday.\nBut there's also some-\n03191217\nthing more - another side\nof the coin. Time devoted\nto pleasure and relaxation\n. . . a pause to refresh .. . a\nbeverage to enjoy are also\nmeaningful in these pres-\nsure packed times. What's\nMan has given himself\nlife without fun, music,\nrefreshment? Pleasure has\na minimum daily require-\nits place.\nment for vitamins and pro-\ntein. But we think he owes\nAnd so a soft drink -\nwhich in our book is purely\nRECYCLED\nhimself a minimum re-\nquirement of refreshment\na refreshing carbonated\nand pleasure too. Nutri-\nbeverage designed only\ntious food, balanced diets\nto please and to refresh -\nhas an important\nare critical to the health\nplace too.\nca Cola\nThe Coca Cola Company\nRECYCLEN\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xfpj0226\n\nQuestion: What are critical for well-being of people today?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Nutritious food, balanced diets",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
748
|
Where was the meeting held?
|
Atlanta
|
Page 5
Coca-Colla
Shift Seen
Continued From First Business Page
drink marketing development in the
company's nearly 100-year history."
Bottlers were notified last week of a
meeting today in Atlanta, but were
given few details and were sworn to
secrecy. Late last week, when the
company announced the press confer-
ence, analysts speculated that Coca-
Cola might disclose plans to intro-
duce a line of juice-based soft drinks
under the Minute Maid label. Coca-
Cola would neither confirm nor deny
those reports.
But, after the Beverage Digest re-
.port, analysts agreed yesterday that
only news as significant as a reformu-
lation of Coke would bring both Ro-
berto Goizueta, Coca-cola's chair-.
man, and Donald R. Keough, the
company's president, to New York
for a press conference.
New Coke Fruit Drink
Is Expected Next Week
By PAMELA G. HOLLIE
has not yet given its Minute Mai
juice soft drink a proper introduction
According to analysts, Coca-Col
The Coca-cola Company said yes-
terday that it would make a major an-
may be trying to rush its new so:
nouncement Tuesday in New York.
drink to market before Pepsico Inc
The Atlanta-based company was not
introduces a similar product.
more specific, but analysts specu-
Pepsico, which is marketing Slice
lated that the company would intro-
a soft drink containing 10 percer
duce its new Minute Maid brand fruit
lemon-lime juice, has rapidly gaine:
juice beverage.
market share from Coca-Cola'
In a rare joint appearance, Roberto
Sprite lemon-lime soft drink. Pepsic
C.. Goizueta, chairman of The Coca-
is expected to test-market a Manda
Cola Company, and Donald R.
rin orange-flavored Slice soon.
Keough, president, will announce the
new product, which Coke called "the
""The gist of it all is that Coke i:
most significant soft drink develop-
going to make the move to challenge
ment in the company's history."
Pepsi's Slice," said Donald J. Lupa
Their appearance at a press confer-
an analyst for Duff & Phelps in Chi
ence is seen as an indication of the im-
cago. "Both Pepsi and Coke are run
portance of the product to the entire
ning fast to counter each other's
moves."
soft drink, food and entertainment
corporation.
A fruit juice product could create a
Coca-cola acknowledged last week
new product line for Coca-Cola. "This
`is a breakthrough into a new market
that it planned to test-market an for Coke," Mr. Lupa said, adding that
orange soda containing 10 percent a Minute Maid line of fruit drinks
juice. But, Coca-Cola, which is known
for its grand product introductions
could present competition for such
fruit drinks as Hawaiian Punch and
and $100 million advertising badgers CurReIS. UCST. edu/docS/XTp|0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 402,
"image": "xfpj0226_5.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "xfpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "5"
}
| 670
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 5\nCoca-Colla\nShift Seen\nContinued From First Business Page\ndrink marketing development in the\ncompany's nearly 100-year history.\"\nBottlers were notified last week of a\nmeeting today in Atlanta, but were\ngiven few details and were sworn to\nsecrecy. Late last week, when the\ncompany announced the press confer-\nence, analysts speculated that Coca-\nCola might disclose plans to intro-\nduce a line of juice-based soft drinks\nunder the Minute Maid label. Coca-\nCola would neither confirm nor deny\nthose reports.\nBut, after the Beverage Digest re-\n.port, analysts agreed yesterday that\nonly news as significant as a reformu-\nlation of Coke would bring both Ro-\nberto Goizueta, Coca-cola's chair-.\nman, and Donald R. Keough, the\ncompany's president, to New York\nfor a press conference.\nNew Coke Fruit Drink\nIs Expected Next Week\nBy PAMELA G. HOLLIE\nhas not yet given its Minute Mai\njuice soft drink a proper introduction\nAccording to analysts, Coca-Col\nThe Coca-cola Company said yes-\nterday that it would make a major an-\nmay be trying to rush its new so:\nnouncement Tuesday in New York.\ndrink to market before Pepsico Inc\nThe Atlanta-based company was not\nintroduces a similar product.\nmore specific, but analysts specu-\nPepsico, which is marketing Slice\nlated that the company would intro-\na soft drink containing 10 percer\nduce its new Minute Maid brand fruit\nlemon-lime juice, has rapidly gaine:\njuice beverage.\nmarket share from Coca-Cola'\nIn a rare joint appearance, Roberto\nSprite lemon-lime soft drink. Pepsic\nC.. Goizueta, chairman of The Coca-\nis expected to test-market a Manda\nCola Company, and Donald R.\nrin orange-flavored Slice soon.\nKeough, president, will announce the\nnew product, which Coke called \"the\n\"\"The gist of it all is that Coke i:\nmost significant soft drink develop-\ngoing to make the move to challenge\nment in the company's history.\"\nPepsi's Slice,\" said Donald J. Lupa\nTheir appearance at a press confer-\nan analyst for Duff & Phelps in Chi\nence is seen as an indication of the im-\ncago. \"Both Pepsi and Coke are run\nportance of the product to the entire\nning fast to counter each other's\nmoves.\"\nsoft drink, food and entertainment\ncorporation.\nA fruit juice product could create a\nCoca-cola acknowledged last week\nnew product line for Coca-Cola. \"This\n`is a breakthrough into a new market\nthat it planned to test-market an for Coke,\" Mr. Lupa said, adding that\norange soda containing 10 percent a Minute Maid line of fruit drinks\njuice. But, Coca-Cola, which is known\nfor its grand product introductions\ncould present competition for such\nfruit drinks as Hawaiian Punch and\nand $100 million advertising badgers CurReIS. UCST. edu/docS/XTp|0226\n\nQuestion: Where was the meeting held?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Atlanta",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
750
|
When will the announcement be held?
|
Tuesday
|
Page 5
Coca-Colla
Shift Seen
Continued From First Business Page
drink marketing development in the
company's nearly 100-year history."
Bottlers were notified last week of a
meeting today in Atlanta, but were
given few details and were sworn to
secrecy. Late last week, when the
company announced the press confer-
ence, analysts speculated that Coca-
Cola might disclose plans to intro-
duce a line of juice-based soft drinks
under the Minute Maid label. Coca-
Cola would neither confirm nor deny
those reports.
But, after the Beverage Digest re-
.port, analysts agreed yesterday that
only news as significant as a reformu-
lation of Coke would bring both Ro-
berto Goizueta, Coca-cola's chair-.
man, and Donald R. Keough, the
company's president, to New York
for a press conference.
New Coke Fruit Drink
Is Expected Next Week
By PAMELA G. HOLLIE
has not yet given its Minute Mai
juice soft drink a proper introduction
According to analysts, Coca-Col
The Coca-cola Company said yes-
terday that it would make a major an-
may be trying to rush its new so:
nouncement Tuesday in New York.
drink to market before Pepsico Inc
The Atlanta-based company was not
introduces a similar product.
more specific, but analysts specu-
Pepsico, which is marketing Slice
lated that the company would intro-
a soft drink containing 10 percer
duce its new Minute Maid brand fruit
lemon-lime juice, has rapidly gaine:
juice beverage.
market share from Coca-Cola'
In a rare joint appearance, Roberto
Sprite lemon-lime soft drink. Pepsic
C.. Goizueta, chairman of The Coca-
is expected to test-market a Manda
Cola Company, and Donald R.
rin orange-flavored Slice soon.
Keough, president, will announce the
new product, which Coke called "the
""The gist of it all is that Coke i:
most significant soft drink develop-
going to make the move to challenge
ment in the company's history."
Pepsi's Slice," said Donald J. Lupa
Their appearance at a press confer-
an analyst for Duff & Phelps in Chi
ence is seen as an indication of the im-
cago. "Both Pepsi and Coke are run
portance of the product to the entire
ning fast to counter each other's
moves."
soft drink, food and entertainment
corporation.
A fruit juice product could create a
Coca-cola acknowledged last week
new product line for Coca-Cola. "This
`is a breakthrough into a new market
that it planned to test-market an for Coke," Mr. Lupa said, adding that
orange soda containing 10 percent a Minute Maid line of fruit drinks
juice. But, Coca-Cola, which is known
for its grand product introductions
could present competition for such
fruit drinks as Hawaiian Punch and
and $100 million advertising badgers CurReIS. UCST. edu/docS/XTp|0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 402,
"image": "xfpj0226_5.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "xfpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "5"
}
| 671
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 5\nCoca-Colla\nShift Seen\nContinued From First Business Page\ndrink marketing development in the\ncompany's nearly 100-year history.\"\nBottlers were notified last week of a\nmeeting today in Atlanta, but were\ngiven few details and were sworn to\nsecrecy. Late last week, when the\ncompany announced the press confer-\nence, analysts speculated that Coca-\nCola might disclose plans to intro-\nduce a line of juice-based soft drinks\nunder the Minute Maid label. Coca-\nCola would neither confirm nor deny\nthose reports.\nBut, after the Beverage Digest re-\n.port, analysts agreed yesterday that\nonly news as significant as a reformu-\nlation of Coke would bring both Ro-\nberto Goizueta, Coca-cola's chair-.\nman, and Donald R. Keough, the\ncompany's president, to New York\nfor a press conference.\nNew Coke Fruit Drink\nIs Expected Next Week\nBy PAMELA G. HOLLIE\nhas not yet given its Minute Mai\njuice soft drink a proper introduction\nAccording to analysts, Coca-Col\nThe Coca-cola Company said yes-\nterday that it would make a major an-\nmay be trying to rush its new so:\nnouncement Tuesday in New York.\ndrink to market before Pepsico Inc\nThe Atlanta-based company was not\nintroduces a similar product.\nmore specific, but analysts specu-\nPepsico, which is marketing Slice\nlated that the company would intro-\na soft drink containing 10 percer\nduce its new Minute Maid brand fruit\nlemon-lime juice, has rapidly gaine:\njuice beverage.\nmarket share from Coca-Cola'\nIn a rare joint appearance, Roberto\nSprite lemon-lime soft drink. Pepsic\nC.. Goizueta, chairman of The Coca-\nis expected to test-market a Manda\nCola Company, and Donald R.\nrin orange-flavored Slice soon.\nKeough, president, will announce the\nnew product, which Coke called \"the\n\"\"The gist of it all is that Coke i:\nmost significant soft drink develop-\ngoing to make the move to challenge\nment in the company's history.\"\nPepsi's Slice,\" said Donald J. Lupa\nTheir appearance at a press confer-\nan analyst for Duff & Phelps in Chi\nence is seen as an indication of the im-\ncago. \"Both Pepsi and Coke are run\nportance of the product to the entire\nning fast to counter each other's\nmoves.\"\nsoft drink, food and entertainment\ncorporation.\nA fruit juice product could create a\nCoca-cola acknowledged last week\nnew product line for Coca-Cola. \"This\n`is a breakthrough into a new market\nthat it planned to test-market an for Coke,\" Mr. Lupa said, adding that\norange soda containing 10 percent a Minute Maid line of fruit drinks\njuice. But, Coca-Cola, which is known\nfor its grand product introductions\ncould present competition for such\nfruit drinks as Hawaiian Punch and\nand $100 million advertising badgers CurReIS. UCST. edu/docS/XTp|0226\n\nQuestion: When will the announcement be held?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Tuesday",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
751
|
Who is the chairman of Coca-Cola company?
|
Roberto C. Goizueta
|
Page 5
Coca-Colla
Shift Seen
Continued From First Business Page
drink marketing development in the
company's nearly 100-year history."
Bottlers were notified last week of a
meeting today in Atlanta, but were
given few details and were sworn to
secrecy. Late last week, when the
company announced the press confer-
ence, analysts speculated that Coca-
Cola might disclose plans to intro-
duce a line of juice-based soft drinks
under the Minute Maid label. Coca-
Cola would neither confirm nor deny
those reports.
But, after the Beverage Digest re-
.port, analysts agreed yesterday that
only news as significant as a reformu-
lation of Coke would bring both Ro-
berto Goizueta, Coca-cola's chair-.
man, and Donald R. Keough, the
company's president, to New York
for a press conference.
New Coke Fruit Drink
Is Expected Next Week
By PAMELA G. HOLLIE
has not yet given its Minute Mai
juice soft drink a proper introduction
According to analysts, Coca-Col
The Coca-cola Company said yes-
terday that it would make a major an-
may be trying to rush its new so:
nouncement Tuesday in New York.
drink to market before Pepsico Inc
The Atlanta-based company was not
introduces a similar product.
more specific, but analysts specu-
Pepsico, which is marketing Slice
lated that the company would intro-
a soft drink containing 10 percer
duce its new Minute Maid brand fruit
lemon-lime juice, has rapidly gaine:
juice beverage.
market share from Coca-Cola'
In a rare joint appearance, Roberto
Sprite lemon-lime soft drink. Pepsic
C.. Goizueta, chairman of The Coca-
is expected to test-market a Manda
Cola Company, and Donald R.
rin orange-flavored Slice soon.
Keough, president, will announce the
new product, which Coke called "the
""The gist of it all is that Coke i:
most significant soft drink develop-
going to make the move to challenge
ment in the company's history."
Pepsi's Slice," said Donald J. Lupa
Their appearance at a press confer-
an analyst for Duff & Phelps in Chi
ence is seen as an indication of the im-
cago. "Both Pepsi and Coke are run
portance of the product to the entire
ning fast to counter each other's
moves."
soft drink, food and entertainment
corporation.
A fruit juice product could create a
Coca-cola acknowledged last week
new product line for Coca-Cola. "This
`is a breakthrough into a new market
that it planned to test-market an for Coke," Mr. Lupa said, adding that
orange soda containing 10 percent a Minute Maid line of fruit drinks
juice. But, Coca-Cola, which is known
for its grand product introductions
could present competition for such
fruit drinks as Hawaiian Punch and
and $100 million advertising badgers CurReIS. UCST. edu/docS/XTp|0226
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 402,
"image": "xfpj0226_5.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "xfpj0226",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "5"
}
| 679
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 5\nCoca-Colla\nShift Seen\nContinued From First Business Page\ndrink marketing development in the\ncompany's nearly 100-year history.\"\nBottlers were notified last week of a\nmeeting today in Atlanta, but were\ngiven few details and were sworn to\nsecrecy. Late last week, when the\ncompany announced the press confer-\nence, analysts speculated that Coca-\nCola might disclose plans to intro-\nduce a line of juice-based soft drinks\nunder the Minute Maid label. Coca-\nCola would neither confirm nor deny\nthose reports.\nBut, after the Beverage Digest re-\n.port, analysts agreed yesterday that\nonly news as significant as a reformu-\nlation of Coke would bring both Ro-\nberto Goizueta, Coca-cola's chair-.\nman, and Donald R. Keough, the\ncompany's president, to New York\nfor a press conference.\nNew Coke Fruit Drink\nIs Expected Next Week\nBy PAMELA G. HOLLIE\nhas not yet given its Minute Mai\njuice soft drink a proper introduction\nAccording to analysts, Coca-Col\nThe Coca-cola Company said yes-\nterday that it would make a major an-\nmay be trying to rush its new so:\nnouncement Tuesday in New York.\ndrink to market before Pepsico Inc\nThe Atlanta-based company was not\nintroduces a similar product.\nmore specific, but analysts specu-\nPepsico, which is marketing Slice\nlated that the company would intro-\na soft drink containing 10 percer\nduce its new Minute Maid brand fruit\nlemon-lime juice, has rapidly gaine:\njuice beverage.\nmarket share from Coca-Cola'\nIn a rare joint appearance, Roberto\nSprite lemon-lime soft drink. Pepsic\nC.. Goizueta, chairman of The Coca-\nis expected to test-market a Manda\nCola Company, and Donald R.\nrin orange-flavored Slice soon.\nKeough, president, will announce the\nnew product, which Coke called \"the\n\"\"The gist of it all is that Coke i:\nmost significant soft drink develop-\ngoing to make the move to challenge\nment in the company's history.\"\nPepsi's Slice,\" said Donald J. Lupa\nTheir appearance at a press confer-\nan analyst for Duff & Phelps in Chi\nence is seen as an indication of the im-\ncago. \"Both Pepsi and Coke are run\nportance of the product to the entire\nning fast to counter each other's\nmoves.\"\nsoft drink, food and entertainment\ncorporation.\nA fruit juice product could create a\nCoca-cola acknowledged last week\nnew product line for Coca-Cola. \"This\n`is a breakthrough into a new market\nthat it planned to test-market an for Coke,\" Mr. Lupa said, adding that\norange soda containing 10 percent a Minute Maid line of fruit drinks\njuice. But, Coca-Cola, which is known\nfor its grand product introductions\ncould present competition for such\nfruit drinks as Hawaiian Punch and\nand $100 million advertising badgers CurReIS. UCST. edu/docS/XTp|0226\n\nQuestion: Who is the chairman of Coca-Cola company?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Roberto C. Goizueta",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.